This interactive slideshow demonstrates step by step how we work with clients and how DCT works by providing a detailed case study, in which DCT was used to develop process to remarkably improve enzyme productivity within only 10 experiments.
This document provides steps to pass parameters between actions in QuickTest Professional (QTP). It describes creating an input test parameter, then defining input parameters for two actions - Action1 and Action2. The input for Action1 is parameterized to pull the value from the test parameter, and Action2's input is parameterized to pull from Action1's parameter. This allows passing the test parameter value through both actions, demonstrated by displaying the parameter value in a message box in Action2.
Qtp passing parameters between actionsRamu Palanki
The document provides steps to pass parameters between actions in QTP. It describes creating two actions, defining input parameters for the test and each action, and parameterizing the action inputs to pull values from the test parameters. This allows passing the value of the test parameter to the first action, and passing the first action's parameter to the second action.
This document outlines a quality management system procedure for handling nonconformities. It defines nonconformities and the corrective and preventive actions used to address them. The procedure applies to nonconformities in products, services, and management systems. It describes identifying nonconformities, controlling them by investigating causes and implementing actions, reviewing corrective actions, and maintaining related records. The goal is to proactively eliminate deficiencies and prevent nonconformities from reoccurring.
Improving Laboratory Performance Through QC - CommutabilityRandox
This document discusses the importance of using commutable quality control materials in laboratories. It states that approximately 70% of clinical decisions are based on laboratory test results, so reliable quality control is needed. Non-commutable controls can lead to unnecessary shifts in quality control values when reagent batches change. In contrast, commutable controls will perform consistently and reflect actual patient sample performance. The document also describes a case study that demonstrates how a laboratory's quality control values remained stable between reagent batch changes when using Randox commutable controls, unlike with their previous non-commutable controls.
Monitoring External Quality Assessment / Proficiency Testing Performance - Investigating the source of the problem.
In order to identify the source of the problem it is useful to be aware of the most common causes of poor EQA performance. Errors can occur at any
stage of the testing process however EQA is most concerned with detecting analytical errors i.e. errors that occur during the analysis of the sample.
Most analytical errors can be easily divided into three main areas; clerical errors, systematic errors and random errors. Systematic errors result in
inaccurate results that consistently show a positive or negative bias. Random errors on the other hand affect precision and result in fluctuations in
either direction.
The laboratory shall determine measurement uncertainty for each measurement procedure,
in the examination phases used to report measured quantity values on patients’ samples. The
laboratory shall define the performance requirements for the measurement uncertainty of each
measurement procedure and regularly review estimates of measurement uncertainty.
Aetna icd 10 collaborative testing Nov 2014Florida Blue
Mr. Brian Parkany, Senior Director of Strategic Initiatives at Aetna, shared their testing results for ICD-10 on our November 21, 2014 Open Line Friday call. For a complete list of ICD-10 resources, visit www.floridablue.com/icd-10
This document describes how an analytical laboratory automated their urine drug screening workflow using ASCENT rules-based software. The new workflow applied data quality rules to 90% of samples, flagging only those that needed human review. This reduced the manual review time per batch by 83%. The laboratory tested the new system on 1400 samples across 35 batches, finding 97.9% correlation between automated and manual results. The automated workflow provided consistent application of rules, remote data access, and reduced the workload for certifiers and analysts.
This document provides steps to pass parameters between actions in QuickTest Professional (QTP). It describes creating an input test parameter, then defining input parameters for two actions - Action1 and Action2. The input for Action1 is parameterized to pull the value from the test parameter, and Action2's input is parameterized to pull from Action1's parameter. This allows passing the test parameter value through both actions, demonstrated by displaying the parameter value in a message box in Action2.
Qtp passing parameters between actionsRamu Palanki
The document provides steps to pass parameters between actions in QTP. It describes creating two actions, defining input parameters for the test and each action, and parameterizing the action inputs to pull values from the test parameters. This allows passing the value of the test parameter to the first action, and passing the first action's parameter to the second action.
This document outlines a quality management system procedure for handling nonconformities. It defines nonconformities and the corrective and preventive actions used to address them. The procedure applies to nonconformities in products, services, and management systems. It describes identifying nonconformities, controlling them by investigating causes and implementing actions, reviewing corrective actions, and maintaining related records. The goal is to proactively eliminate deficiencies and prevent nonconformities from reoccurring.
Improving Laboratory Performance Through QC - CommutabilityRandox
This document discusses the importance of using commutable quality control materials in laboratories. It states that approximately 70% of clinical decisions are based on laboratory test results, so reliable quality control is needed. Non-commutable controls can lead to unnecessary shifts in quality control values when reagent batches change. In contrast, commutable controls will perform consistently and reflect actual patient sample performance. The document also describes a case study that demonstrates how a laboratory's quality control values remained stable between reagent batch changes when using Randox commutable controls, unlike with their previous non-commutable controls.
Monitoring External Quality Assessment / Proficiency Testing Performance - Investigating the source of the problem.
In order to identify the source of the problem it is useful to be aware of the most common causes of poor EQA performance. Errors can occur at any
stage of the testing process however EQA is most concerned with detecting analytical errors i.e. errors that occur during the analysis of the sample.
Most analytical errors can be easily divided into three main areas; clerical errors, systematic errors and random errors. Systematic errors result in
inaccurate results that consistently show a positive or negative bias. Random errors on the other hand affect precision and result in fluctuations in
either direction.
The laboratory shall determine measurement uncertainty for each measurement procedure,
in the examination phases used to report measured quantity values on patients’ samples. The
laboratory shall define the performance requirements for the measurement uncertainty of each
measurement procedure and regularly review estimates of measurement uncertainty.
Aetna icd 10 collaborative testing Nov 2014Florida Blue
Mr. Brian Parkany, Senior Director of Strategic Initiatives at Aetna, shared their testing results for ICD-10 on our November 21, 2014 Open Line Friday call. For a complete list of ICD-10 resources, visit www.floridablue.com/icd-10
This document describes how an analytical laboratory automated their urine drug screening workflow using ASCENT rules-based software. The new workflow applied data quality rules to 90% of samples, flagging only those that needed human review. This reduced the manual review time per batch by 83%. The laboratory tested the new system on 1400 samples across 35 batches, finding 97.9% correlation between automated and manual results. The automated workflow provided consistent application of rules, remote data access, and reduced the workload for certifiers and analysts.
Troubleshooting Poor EQA/QC Performance in the Laboratory Randox
Step by step guide for clinical laboratories wishing to troubleshoot poor QC or EQA performance. Tips on how to distinguish between random error and systematic error. Suggested corrective actions are also provided.
This document discusses linearity verification materials from Randox. It provides an overview of the product portfolio, which includes solutions for assessing linearity of cardiac markers, specific proteins, and therapeutic drugs on various analyzer platforms. The linearity materials are supplied in a liquid ready-to-use format for convenience. The document also highlights the data reduction software, which automatically generates reports and allows real-time review of peer group data through an intuitive interface.
Designing an appropriate qc design procedure for your lab 5 mar15Randox
This document discusses the importance of quality control (QC) procedures in laboratories and provides five simple steps for effective QC. It emphasizes that the goal of QC is to ensure accurate and reliable test results in order to avoid harming patients. The five steps include: 1) identifying quality specifications for each test, 2) choosing good quality control materials, 3) starting and ending patient testing with QC evaluation, 4) understanding good QC results, and 5) recognizing and addressing out-of-control events. Participation in an external quality assessment scheme is also recommended to help detect errors. The document stresses applying QC procedures appropriately based on each test's performance and prioritizing high-risk tests.
Understanding statistics in laboratory quality controlRandox
This document discusses laboratory quality control and interpreting quality control results. It outlines a 5 step process: 1) Calculate the mean, 2) Calculate the standard deviation, 3) Establish decision limits, 4) Create a Levey-Jennings chart, and 5) Accept or reject results based on quality control rules. Statistics like the mean, standard deviation, and decision limits are used to monitor the accuracy and precision of analytical testing and ensure reliable patient results. Quality control software can automate the calculation of these statistics and generation of charts to more easily monitor performance.
This document provides a guide to running quality control (QC) samples in a laboratory. It outlines the steps for receipt and storage of QC materials, including recommended temperature conditions. It describes safe handling practices and preparation steps for different types of controls, such as liquid ready-to-use, liquid frozen, and lyophilized controls. The guide also covers the application and interpretation of QC results to ensure test values fall within the expected ranges listed on the product insert. Following the procedures outlined helps ensure proper QC monitoring of analytical testing in the laboratory.
Designing an appropriate QC procedure for your laboratoryRandox
Improving Laboratory Performance Through Quality Control - Five Simple Steps for QC Success.
It is easy to get caught up in an abundance of QC statistics and forget the fundamental reason why
QC exists in the first instance. QC is about detecting errors and ensuring that the results you
produce are accurate and reliable. All QC procedures should focus on reducing the risk of harm
to the patient. We are not examining statistics; we are examining real patients, real results and real
lives. Around 70% of all medical decisions are based on laboratory results, which is why it is of
utmost importance that each and every laboratory, has a well-designed QC procedure in place.
RIQAS is the largest international External Quality Assessment (EQA)/ Proficiency Testing (PT) scheme, there are currently more than 45,000 participants in 133 countries.
This document describes a human liquid ready-to-use stable multi-analyte control containing 27 different analytes including antibody isotypes, complement components, and other specific proteins. It reports that the control material has an open vial stability of 30 days when stored between 2-8 degrees Celsius and a shelf life stability of at least 2 years under the same storage conditions based on measurements on various automated systems. The control is concluded to be a convenient ready-to-use material for clinical applications that standardizes the test menu and reduces errors.
This document describes the testing plan and strategy for a project with ID 32. It discusses various types of testing conducted, including unit testing, integration testing, system testing, performance testing, and statistical testing. Test cases are provided for paying fees, new admission, and enrolment modules. The test cases specify test conditions, expected outputs, actual outputs, and whether each test passed or failed.
Testing is important to identify errors and improve systems. There are different types of testing like functional, navigational, and user testing. It is important to have a test plan that evaluates all aspects of a solution using normal, erroneous, and boundary test data. The test plan should show what will be tested and expected results. Documenting test results in a table with screenshots provides evidence that a system works as intended.
Acusera 24.7 Interlaboratory Data Management Randox
Acusera 24•7 Live Online is an interlaboratory data management package designed to complement the Acusera range of Internal Quality Controls. Created to help laboratories effectively manage and interpret their QC results, the analytical capabilities of Acusera 24•7 Live Online, coupled with the superior quality and flexibility of our Acusera control range, will revolutionise your laboratory's workflow enabling early identification of any trends or system errors.
Acusera 24.7 Live Online will automatically calculate internal QC statistics including mean, standard deviation and CV. The ability to apply user defined QC multi-rules will help to reduce false rejections and maintain a high level of error detection.
Online access anytime, anywhere
Peer group data from over 20,000 participants
Peer group statistics updated daily
Unique dashboard highlights poor performance
Interactive charts combining multiple analytes, lots and instruments
Comprehensive reports including audit trail reports to aid accreditation
Automated QC result entry via Acusera 24•7 Connect
This document discusses different quality control formats that laboratories can use to ensure accurate patient test results. It describes the benefits of consolidated multi-analyte controls that allow laboratories to reduce costs by using fewer control products and simplify the quality control process. These controls consolidate parameters into single vials containing up to 100 analytes. The document also discusses liquid ready-to-use controls as being the most convenient format that require no preparation or reconstitution. Finally, it promotes Randox quality control products and services that aim to streamline quality control testing for laboratories.
Acusera 24.7 is an interboratory data management software capable of automatically calculating measurement of uncertainty and six-sigma. With real time peer group updates and user friendly comprehensive charts and reports including Levey Jennings and histograms, our Acusera 24.7 software is now smarter, faster and more efficient than ever before!
How to Improve Quality and Efficiency Using Test Data AnalyticsTequra Analytics
Discover 8 ways in our guide for advanced manufacturers.
Do you perform advanced manufacturing in an industry such as aerospace, automotive, medical devices or telecoms? Is product testing part of your manufacturing process? If you can answer yes to these questions, keep reading to learn how test data analytics can enable many improvements.
QAI QUEST 2016 Webinar Series: Pairwise Testing w/ Philip LewXBOSoft
In anticipation of the QAI QUEST 2016 Conference & Expo in Chicago, Illinois, XBOSoft’s CEO Philip Lew presented a live webinar on Pairwise Testing. Find out what pairwise testing is, the advantages and disadvantages of implementing this method, and when to use it and how.
For Philip Lew's demonstration of pairwise testing, view the recorded webinar at https://vimeo.com/155889518
QC Multi rules - Improving Laboratory Performance Through Quality ControlRandox
Randox Quality Control's latest educational guide examines and explains what QC Multi-Rules are, How to identify an out of control event with QC rules, How to use QC Multi-Rules, The different types of analytical errors, The tools to assist labs and how a lab can troubleshoot QC errors.
Calibration and validation model (Simulation )Rajan Kandel
This document discusses calibration and validation of models. Calibration is an iterative process of comparing a model to the real system and adjusting model parameters to better match observed real data. Validation checks that the model's output matches real data and ensures the model is useful. Key aspects of calibration discussed include comparing model output to measured data at different time granularities, and additional data needs. Validation ensures the model assumptions and programming are sound. Steps in validation include building a model with face validity, validating assumptions, and comparing model input-output transformations to the real system.
How often is Right for Laboratory Quality Control?Randox
Improving Laboratory Performance Through QC - How often is right for QC? Ask the Right Questions to get the Right Answers.
It is widely accepted that laboratories should perform QC at least every day of patient testing. However, is this adequate for every assay and for every laboratory? Is running QC once per day really sufficient? what is the "right" frequency for running QC samples in your laboratory?
Aplication of on line data analytics to a continuous process polybetene unitEmerson Exchange
This Emerson Exchange, 2013 presentation summarizes the 2013 field trail results achieved by applying on-line continuous data analytics to Lubrizol’s continuous polybutene process. Continuous data analytics may be used to provide an on-line prediction of quality parameters, and enable on-line detection of fault conditions. Information is provided on improvements made in the model used for quality parameter prediction, and how the field trail platform was integrated into the process unit. Presenters Qiwei Li, production engineer, Efren Hernandez and Robert Wojewodka, Lubrizol Corp., and Terry Blevins, principal technologist at Emerson, won best in conference in the process optimization track for this presentation.
Quality andc apability hand out 091123200010 Phpapp01jasonhian
The document outlines key concepts in quality management and Six Sigma methodology. It discusses definitions of quality, total quality management (TQM), and Six Sigma. Six Sigma aims to reduce defects through eliminating variation and achieving near zero defect levels. It uses a Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC) methodology. Statistical process control charts and process capability indices are also introduced to measure quality performance. An example of Mumbai's successful lunch delivery system achieving over 5-sigma quality levels is provided.
Troubleshooting Poor EQA/QC Performance in the Laboratory Randox
Step by step guide for clinical laboratories wishing to troubleshoot poor QC or EQA performance. Tips on how to distinguish between random error and systematic error. Suggested corrective actions are also provided.
This document discusses linearity verification materials from Randox. It provides an overview of the product portfolio, which includes solutions for assessing linearity of cardiac markers, specific proteins, and therapeutic drugs on various analyzer platforms. The linearity materials are supplied in a liquid ready-to-use format for convenience. The document also highlights the data reduction software, which automatically generates reports and allows real-time review of peer group data through an intuitive interface.
Designing an appropriate qc design procedure for your lab 5 mar15Randox
This document discusses the importance of quality control (QC) procedures in laboratories and provides five simple steps for effective QC. It emphasizes that the goal of QC is to ensure accurate and reliable test results in order to avoid harming patients. The five steps include: 1) identifying quality specifications for each test, 2) choosing good quality control materials, 3) starting and ending patient testing with QC evaluation, 4) understanding good QC results, and 5) recognizing and addressing out-of-control events. Participation in an external quality assessment scheme is also recommended to help detect errors. The document stresses applying QC procedures appropriately based on each test's performance and prioritizing high-risk tests.
Understanding statistics in laboratory quality controlRandox
This document discusses laboratory quality control and interpreting quality control results. It outlines a 5 step process: 1) Calculate the mean, 2) Calculate the standard deviation, 3) Establish decision limits, 4) Create a Levey-Jennings chart, and 5) Accept or reject results based on quality control rules. Statistics like the mean, standard deviation, and decision limits are used to monitor the accuracy and precision of analytical testing and ensure reliable patient results. Quality control software can automate the calculation of these statistics and generation of charts to more easily monitor performance.
This document provides a guide to running quality control (QC) samples in a laboratory. It outlines the steps for receipt and storage of QC materials, including recommended temperature conditions. It describes safe handling practices and preparation steps for different types of controls, such as liquid ready-to-use, liquid frozen, and lyophilized controls. The guide also covers the application and interpretation of QC results to ensure test values fall within the expected ranges listed on the product insert. Following the procedures outlined helps ensure proper QC monitoring of analytical testing in the laboratory.
Designing an appropriate QC procedure for your laboratoryRandox
Improving Laboratory Performance Through Quality Control - Five Simple Steps for QC Success.
It is easy to get caught up in an abundance of QC statistics and forget the fundamental reason why
QC exists in the first instance. QC is about detecting errors and ensuring that the results you
produce are accurate and reliable. All QC procedures should focus on reducing the risk of harm
to the patient. We are not examining statistics; we are examining real patients, real results and real
lives. Around 70% of all medical decisions are based on laboratory results, which is why it is of
utmost importance that each and every laboratory, has a well-designed QC procedure in place.
RIQAS is the largest international External Quality Assessment (EQA)/ Proficiency Testing (PT) scheme, there are currently more than 45,000 participants in 133 countries.
This document describes a human liquid ready-to-use stable multi-analyte control containing 27 different analytes including antibody isotypes, complement components, and other specific proteins. It reports that the control material has an open vial stability of 30 days when stored between 2-8 degrees Celsius and a shelf life stability of at least 2 years under the same storage conditions based on measurements on various automated systems. The control is concluded to be a convenient ready-to-use material for clinical applications that standardizes the test menu and reduces errors.
This document describes the testing plan and strategy for a project with ID 32. It discusses various types of testing conducted, including unit testing, integration testing, system testing, performance testing, and statistical testing. Test cases are provided for paying fees, new admission, and enrolment modules. The test cases specify test conditions, expected outputs, actual outputs, and whether each test passed or failed.
Testing is important to identify errors and improve systems. There are different types of testing like functional, navigational, and user testing. It is important to have a test plan that evaluates all aspects of a solution using normal, erroneous, and boundary test data. The test plan should show what will be tested and expected results. Documenting test results in a table with screenshots provides evidence that a system works as intended.
Acusera 24.7 Interlaboratory Data Management Randox
Acusera 24•7 Live Online is an interlaboratory data management package designed to complement the Acusera range of Internal Quality Controls. Created to help laboratories effectively manage and interpret their QC results, the analytical capabilities of Acusera 24•7 Live Online, coupled with the superior quality and flexibility of our Acusera control range, will revolutionise your laboratory's workflow enabling early identification of any trends or system errors.
Acusera 24.7 Live Online will automatically calculate internal QC statistics including mean, standard deviation and CV. The ability to apply user defined QC multi-rules will help to reduce false rejections and maintain a high level of error detection.
Online access anytime, anywhere
Peer group data from over 20,000 participants
Peer group statistics updated daily
Unique dashboard highlights poor performance
Interactive charts combining multiple analytes, lots and instruments
Comprehensive reports including audit trail reports to aid accreditation
Automated QC result entry via Acusera 24•7 Connect
This document discusses different quality control formats that laboratories can use to ensure accurate patient test results. It describes the benefits of consolidated multi-analyte controls that allow laboratories to reduce costs by using fewer control products and simplify the quality control process. These controls consolidate parameters into single vials containing up to 100 analytes. The document also discusses liquid ready-to-use controls as being the most convenient format that require no preparation or reconstitution. Finally, it promotes Randox quality control products and services that aim to streamline quality control testing for laboratories.
Acusera 24.7 is an interboratory data management software capable of automatically calculating measurement of uncertainty and six-sigma. With real time peer group updates and user friendly comprehensive charts and reports including Levey Jennings and histograms, our Acusera 24.7 software is now smarter, faster and more efficient than ever before!
How to Improve Quality and Efficiency Using Test Data AnalyticsTequra Analytics
Discover 8 ways in our guide for advanced manufacturers.
Do you perform advanced manufacturing in an industry such as aerospace, automotive, medical devices or telecoms? Is product testing part of your manufacturing process? If you can answer yes to these questions, keep reading to learn how test data analytics can enable many improvements.
QAI QUEST 2016 Webinar Series: Pairwise Testing w/ Philip LewXBOSoft
In anticipation of the QAI QUEST 2016 Conference & Expo in Chicago, Illinois, XBOSoft’s CEO Philip Lew presented a live webinar on Pairwise Testing. Find out what pairwise testing is, the advantages and disadvantages of implementing this method, and when to use it and how.
For Philip Lew's demonstration of pairwise testing, view the recorded webinar at https://vimeo.com/155889518
QC Multi rules - Improving Laboratory Performance Through Quality ControlRandox
Randox Quality Control's latest educational guide examines and explains what QC Multi-Rules are, How to identify an out of control event with QC rules, How to use QC Multi-Rules, The different types of analytical errors, The tools to assist labs and how a lab can troubleshoot QC errors.
Calibration and validation model (Simulation )Rajan Kandel
This document discusses calibration and validation of models. Calibration is an iterative process of comparing a model to the real system and adjusting model parameters to better match observed real data. Validation checks that the model's output matches real data and ensures the model is useful. Key aspects of calibration discussed include comparing model output to measured data at different time granularities, and additional data needs. Validation ensures the model assumptions and programming are sound. Steps in validation include building a model with face validity, validating assumptions, and comparing model input-output transformations to the real system.
How often is Right for Laboratory Quality Control?Randox
Improving Laboratory Performance Through QC - How often is right for QC? Ask the Right Questions to get the Right Answers.
It is widely accepted that laboratories should perform QC at least every day of patient testing. However, is this adequate for every assay and for every laboratory? Is running QC once per day really sufficient? what is the "right" frequency for running QC samples in your laboratory?
Aplication of on line data analytics to a continuous process polybetene unitEmerson Exchange
This Emerson Exchange, 2013 presentation summarizes the 2013 field trail results achieved by applying on-line continuous data analytics to Lubrizol’s continuous polybutene process. Continuous data analytics may be used to provide an on-line prediction of quality parameters, and enable on-line detection of fault conditions. Information is provided on improvements made in the model used for quality parameter prediction, and how the field trail platform was integrated into the process unit. Presenters Qiwei Li, production engineer, Efren Hernandez and Robert Wojewodka, Lubrizol Corp., and Terry Blevins, principal technologist at Emerson, won best in conference in the process optimization track for this presentation.
Quality andc apability hand out 091123200010 Phpapp01jasonhian
The document outlines key concepts in quality management and Six Sigma methodology. It discusses definitions of quality, total quality management (TQM), and Six Sigma. Six Sigma aims to reduce defects through eliminating variation and achieving near zero defect levels. It uses a Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC) methodology. Statistical process control charts and process capability indices are also introduced to measure quality performance. An example of Mumbai's successful lunch delivery system achieving over 5-sigma quality levels is provided.
Asq Auto Webinar Spc Common Questions WebWalter Oldeck
This document summarizes a webinar on statistical process control (SPC) that addressed common questions. The webinar covered whether different sources of variation can be on the same control chart, the difference between specifications and control limits, why control limits are needed even if specifications exist, and what the process capability indices Cp, Cpk, Pp and Ppk represent and how they can differ depending on how well a process is centered and stable over time. The webinar encouraged participants to ask questions in the chat and provided information on how to access the slides and video recording.
Six Sigma is a data-driven methodology for process improvement originally developed by Motorola. It involves defining a project goal, measuring key aspects of the current process, analyzing data to determine root causes of defects, improving the process by addressing causes, and controlling future process variation. The document provides an overview of Six Sigma and its development, then gives an example project summary involving improving calcium levels in a product. The project uses Six Sigma tools like process mapping, measurement systems analysis, data analysis, design of experiments, and risk analysis to select and validate factors influencing calcium and develop improvements.
1. The document discusses the Measure phase of the DMAIC process for Six Sigma innovation projects.
2. Key aspects of the Measure phase include selecting Critical to Quality characteristics, defining performance standards and specifications, establishing a data collection plan, and validating measurement systems.
3. Tools discussed that are useful for the Measure phase include process mapping, fishbone diagrams, Pareto analysis, and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). FMEA involves identifying failure modes, causes, and effects to determine appropriate actions.
The document provides instructions for creating runs, defining protocols and graphs, viewing results, and performing background subtraction and quantification on the Smart Cycler system. It also discusses user administration, analysis settings, export options, melt analysis, and troubleshooting.
Basic Engineering Design (Part 6): Test and EvaluateDenise Wilson
The document describes the process of testing and evaluating components in the engineering design cycle. It emphasizes beginning with testing critical components, like sensors, in isolated and controlled environments to characterize performance before moving to more complex system-level testing. Testing should progress from controlled laboratory settings to realistic operating environments to verify functionality. Both critical and supporting components require testing to validate they meet design specifications.
The document discusses various software testing and evaluation techniques used to ensure software solutions meet design specifications and are free from errors. It covers topics like unit testing, integration testing, system testing, black box and white box testing, test data generation, benchmarking, and quality assurance.
The document provides an overview of various quality management concepts and tools including:
- Total Quality Management (TQM) which aims to design high quality products and ensure consistent production.
- Six Sigma which seeks to reduce process variation and eliminate defects through tools like DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control).
- ISO 9000 standards for quality management systems which many companies adopt for global competitiveness.
- Various analytical tools used in quality improvement like control charts, flow diagrams and cause-and-effect diagrams.
Measurement System Analysis is the first step of the Measure Phase of an improvement project. Before you can pass judgment on the process, you need to ensure that your measurement system is accurate, precise, capable and in control.
Quality management aims to continuously improve processes to meet customer needs and reduce defects. It encompasses tools like statistical process control (SPC), which uses control charts to monitor processes for abnormal variation. Control charts have upper and lower control limits to detect assignable causes of variation. P-charts are used for attributes where outcomes are pass/fail, while X-bar and R-charts are used for variables with sample means and ranges. Capability indices like Cpk indicate if a process can produce within specifications. Continuous improvement requires preventing defects through tools like fishbone diagrams, histograms, and Pareto charts to prioritize issues.
Based on the additional data provided:
- The average range (R) is 0.45
- The average (x) is 8.034
- The sample size (n) is 8
= 1.864(0.45) = 0.838
LCLR = D3R = 0.136(0.45) = 0.061
All sample ranges fall within the control limits on the R-chart, so the process variability is in statistical control.
For the x-chart:
UCLx = x + A2R = 8.034 + 2.282(0.45) = 8.234
LCLx = x - A2R = 8.
The Quality Control Program (QCP) provides laboratories with statistical reports and tools to improve quality and compare performance to peer groups. It collects data from 800 labs worldwide. The QCP includes 8 statistical comparison reports that provide indicators of precision, accuracy, and uncertainty to help laboratories evaluate their results over time, identify errors, and improve performance relative to international standards. Primary users can enroll laboratories and instruments and enter quality control data either manually or via automatic daily uploads from certain instruments. Secondary users can be added to manage specific instruments.
This presentation on batch process analytics was given at Emerson Exchange, 2010. A overview of batch data analytics is presented and information provided on a field trail of on-line batch data analytics at the Lubrizol, Rouen, France plant.
Modern business drivers are continually pushing to reduce the time it takes to get a product or service to market, reduce the risk and cost associated with that, and to improve quality.
In laboratories, delivering an analytical result that’s ‘right first time’ (RFT) is the answer. There is no reprocessing data or re-running injections and no out of specification (OOS) results or reporting/calculation errors.
Using chromatography data system tools for RFT analysis automatically gives high quality of results and confidence in results, lower cost of analysis, improved lab efficiency, and faster release to market and return on investment (ROI).
This document discusses various types of software testing performed at different stages of the software development lifecycle. It describes component testing, integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing. Component testing involves testing individual program units in isolation. Integration testing combines components and tests their interactions, starting small and building up. System testing evaluates the integrated system against functional and non-functional requirements. Acceptance testing confirms the system meets stakeholder needs.
Critical Checks for Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare: Validating Your Data Inte...Minitab, LLC
Watch online at: https://hubs.ly/H0hswm60
Organizations in the pharmaceutical and health sectors are being asked by regulators to:
- Apply more complete methods to validate analytical techniques and measurement systems, known as Data Integrity
-Monitor and evaluate the performance of production processes, otherwise called Statistical Process Control (SPC)
In this presentation you will learn how to:
-Improve the precision and accuracy of analytical techniques, using Minitab's tools for Gage R & R, Gage Linearity and Bias studies and Design of Experiments
-Select the relevant control charts and capability analyses for data that does and does not follow the normal distribution
The presentation will explain how data integrity and process monitoring are critical to each other for regulatory compliance. If the data is not healthy, the evaluation of the process could also be incorrect.
You will finish with the confidence to use more sophisticated statistical techniques, in particular for data integrity.
Modern quality systems in pharmaceutical education and industriesKoshish Gabhane
The document discusses quality systems and tools used in pharmaceutical education and industries, including Six Sigma. It provides details on Six Sigma and how it has been applied successfully in various case studies, including reducing transcription errors and delays in a medical transcription business and improving processes in educational institutions. Modern quality tools like Six Sigma focus on reducing defects, meeting customer requirements, and improving processes to increase quality and efficiency.
The document discusses model-based testing (MBT) that was implemented at SpareBank 1 (SB1) to test their Master Data Management (MDM) system. It holds information on 7 million customer records and receives 12,000 daily updates from public registers. MBT uses a model of rules and requirements to automatically generate test cases from different parameters and coverage criteria. This allows generating targeted test cases for particular changes to reduce maintenance costs compared to manually maintaining test suites. Lessons learned include the importance of a complete and correct model, integrating the MBT tool with test execution tools, and improving usability of MBT tools for testers. The presenter's company aims to advance from manual to automated to adaptive testing using
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!SOFTTECHHUB
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slackshyamraj55
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
Introducing Milvus Lite: Easy-to-Install, Easy-to-Use vector database for you...Zilliz
Join us to introduce Milvus Lite, a vector database that can run on notebooks and laptops, share the same API with Milvus, and integrate with every popular GenAI framework. This webinar is perfect for developers seeking easy-to-use, well-integrated vector databases for their GenAI apps.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !KatiaHIMEUR1
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Case demo powerpoint-final
1. DCT Case Demonstration
Developing a process to stabilize enzyme activity
How Effinity Tech enables our clients to achieve their objectives for
process development within 10 experiments!
2. I. Establish Client Requirements
I.1 Define Target Variables and Objectives
Objective: To discover the optimal agent to stabilize
enzyme activity
Target variable: Relative enzyme activity (Y)
Current level: 100%
Goal: 100% (prevent this enzyme from decaying)
Once the objective is defined, we need some
basic information for a system from our
clients. This is where DCT and our clients’
expertise get “married”.
3. Unlike traditional methodologies DCT:
Optimizes substances and conditions at a time
Optimizes system configurations and parameter values simultaneously
Operates on the principle of “open systems” by considering all potentially related
parameters to deliver a much wider field of initial parameters which will much more likely
reveal the optimum configuration and at a much earlier stage
Does not require selection of a subset of parameters in advance
I.2 Identify System Parameters
Add all potential parameters that are related to the objectives. They could come from:
Current Process
In this case, 16 parameters were provided by the client.
I. Establish Client Requirements
Experience
Publications
Other Sources
4. I. 2&3 - Identify and Define Value Ranges for Parameters
Code Parameter Name Type of Parameters Present Typical
Value
Value range
X1 Temperature Condition n/a 25-65
X2 Time Condition 0-4
X3 PH Condition 4-12
X4 Potassium Metallic Ions 0-0.1
X5 Cobalt Metallic Ions 0-0.1
X6 Magnesium Metallic Ions 0-0.1
X7 Iron Metallic Ions 0-0.1
X8 Zinc Metallic Ions 0-0.1
X9 Calcium Metallic Ions 0-0.1
X10 Propylene glycol Organic materials 0-5
X11 Carob bean gum Organic Materials 0-5
X12 Sodium Alginate Organic Materials 0-5
X13 Konjac flour Organic Materials 0-5
X14 Tryptone Organic Materials 0-5
X15 Peptone Organic Materials. 0-5
X16 Glycerol Organic Materials 0-5
Table 1. Parameter Information
Parameter name is not needed by DCT. This secures our client’s IP.
We show it for demonstration purposes only.
Type is a broad categorization of the parameter
Provide present typical value if data is available. This is
not required. In this case, the client did not have any
experience with developing this process. DCT can still
work without this data.
Provide lower and upper bounds for the parameters. Higher bound
should ideally be less than 100x lower bound. Range should be
“feasible and practical”. For example, don’t use values that will “kill”
the cells or microbes.
ideally less
than 100x
Higher bound
Lower bound
5. II. Design 3-5 Diagnostic Experiments
III. Perform Experiments
At this stage, Effinity Tech designs 3-5 system
diagnostic experiments
Client performs experiments and provides results
6. II. Design 3-5 Diagnostic Experiments
III. Perform Experiments
Exp # Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16
1 83.0 45 2 12 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1 0 0 2.5 2.5 5 5 0 0 0
2 89.1 25 2 8 0 0 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1 0 0 2.5 2.5 5 5 5
3 62.4 65 2 4 0.1 0.1 0 0 0.05 0.05 5 5 0 0 2.5 2.5 2.5
Table 2. The design and results of the system diagnostic experiments
All parameters are included.
Experiment results provided by client
DCT’s comprehensive approach guarantees that all
parameters are tested in initial diagnostic experiments.
7. IV. Analyze Results
V. Evaluate Parameter Importance
Sensitivity analysis will be conducted by Effinity Tech to
evaluate the contribution of each parameter to the
objective.
Parameters that are important and necessary will
remain in the system and their values optimized in
further designs.
These parameters: X1 X2 X3 X6 X7 X12
X13 make a positive contribution.
We will keep them!
These parameters: X4 X5 X8 X9 X10 X11
X14 X15 X16 make zero or negative
contribution! They’re outta here!
8. V. Design 1-3 System Control Experiments
III. Perform Experiments
Exp # Y X1 X2 X3 X6 X7 X12 X13
4 121.7 25 2 9 0 0.08 4.5 0
5 134.0 25 2 9 0.08 0 0 4.5
Table 3. The design and results of system control experiments (round #1)
Experiment results provided by client
Both results exceeded the objective!
9. IV. Analyze Results
V. Evaluate Parameter Importance
Further sensitivity analysis was conducted by Effinity
Tech to evaluate the remaining parameters showing
there is potential to get even better results.
Two more parameters were excluded. Now, only 5
parameters were still included in the system and their
values further optimized.
These parameters: X1 X2 X3 X6 X13
make a positive contribution. We will
keep them!
These parameters: X7 X12 don’t help!
They’re outta here!
10. V. Design 1-3 System Control Experiments
III. Perform Experiments
Exp # Y X1 X2 X3 X6 X13
6 102.4 25 2 10 0.12 4
7 152.1 25 2 9 0.1 6
8 105.5 25 2 11 0.08 5
Table 4. The design and results of system control experiments (round #2)Hooray! We’ve exceeded the objective by 52.1%!
11. VII. Project Completion
Perform further adjustments and complete the project
• To ensure the best results, 2 more experiments
were designed but there was no further
improvement.
• This concluded the project!
DCT Really Works!!!
12. VII. Project Completion
Conclusion:
Required only 10 experiments with DCT
Increased enzyme activity by 52.1%
Quote from Client:
DCT greatly improved the level of the target variable, which has important
application value. For a complex multi-variable and multi-level system, DCT can
significantly reduce the number of experiments and increase efficiency.
Moreover, it is very easy to implement.
Editor's Notes
Based on the results of the diagnostic experiments, Effinity Tech engineers will conduct a sensitivity analysis on every parameter and analyze its contribution to the objectives. Some parameters will be excluded from the system at this point and the value of the remaining parameters will be optimized at the same time. . Effinity Tech will then design a new iteration of experiments with the reduced set of parameters, which we call system control experiments, in order to further optimize the system.In the “1st Round Experiments” section you can see 9 parameters have been excluded and only 7 parameters still remained in this project after the sensitivity analysis. Effinity Tech then designed 2 experiments using these parameters.Analyze the results and further design system behavior experimentsThe analysis revealed that 9 parameters, such as X4 and X8, X9, did not contribute to the production of -PGA. Therefore, they were eliminated in the subsequent experiments. To gain higher enzyme activity, we further adjusted the remaining 7 factors shown in Table 3. Again, the client did the experiments and provided the result, relative enzyme activity (y), to us for analysis. We can see that the enzyme activity has already significantly increased in this group of experiments.
Even though the client’s original target value had already been achieved, based on our analysis of the results from the first round of system control experiments, our engineers saw the potential to achieve better results and designed the second round of experiments, in which parameters X7 and X12 were excluded. So now, only 5 parameters were used in the dDesign and perform system diagnostic experiments (Table 2). All the 16 parameters are included in each of the 3 experiments. The client performed the experiments and provided results for us to analyze.3. Analyze the results and further design system behavior experiments. (Table 3) Exclude 9 parameters and design 3 more experiments with the remaining 7 parameters for the client to perform. 4. Based on the analysis of results from the client, conducted further design. Reduced the parameters from 7 to 5. (Table 4)5. Further adjustment and completion of the project.
Design and perform system diagnostic experiments (Table 2). All the 16 parameters are included in each of the 3 experiments. The client performed the experiments and provided results for us to analyze.3. Analyze the results and further design system behavior experiments. (Table 3) Exclude 9 parameters and design 3 more experiments with the remaining 7 parameters for the client to perform. 4. Based on the analysis of results from the client, conducted further design. Reduced the parameters from 7 to 5. (Table 4)5. Further adjustment and completion of the project.