The document discusses the need to break the repetitive cycle of using the same project plans without customization or evaluation of past results. It emphasizes the importance of setting goals, identifying risks, and exploring better approaches to enhance program effectiveness. It also highlights obstacles to change, such as time and budget constraints, while advocating for change management and documenting successes.

1. Break the
“Always” Cycle
Fred Schenkelberg

3. So Why Do the
Same Thing
Just use the same plan as the last
project.

4. Need the plan now

5. It Worked
Last Time

6. What if It
Doesn’t Work?

7. ARE RELIABILITY ACTIVITIES
TAILORED FOR EACH SITUATION?
Is each plan customized?

8. IS RELIABILITY A SET
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS?
Do the results make a difference?

9. Is There a Better
Way?
In what way is it better?

10. Set Goals – Make Estimates

11. Find Risks - Monitor

12. Do Testing that
Adds Value

13. WHAT OTHERS WAYS CAN
YOUR PROGRAM IMPROVE?
Do the results make a difference?

14. Obstacles?
What is preventing you?

15. Do Not Have Time

16. No Capital Budget

17. Risk of Unknown

18. SOMETIMES ITS JUST THE
CHANGE THAT IS DIFFICULT?
Change is good, right?

19. Ideas?
How do we overcome these
obstacles?

20. Time

21. Budget

22. Risk

23. WHAT OTHERS WAYS CAN
YOUR PROGRAM IMPROVE?
Do the results make a difference?

24. Identify Risks of
Not Changing

25. Identify a
Better
Approach

26. Estimate the
Value
of Changing

27. Change Management

28. Document
Successes

29. Break the ‘Always’ Cycle
1. Recognize the risks
1. Identify better
approach
1. Estimate Value
1. Change Management
1. Document Success

30. Reliability Value
• Join Accendo
Reliability
• Download a copy
directly

31. What are your
Questions?
Thanks for participating.