S.A.SOMA SEKHAR*,
DEPT.OF.ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, ANDHRA UNIVERSITY.
VISAKHAPATNAM (A.P).
SKELETON
INTRODUCTION
MY INSPIRATION
ALGAE : BEST SOURCE
PROCESS
ADVANTAGES : ADVOCATE
CONCLUSIONS
REFERANCES
AKNOWLEDGEMENT
INTRODUCTION
 The sustainable production of alternative sources of fuels is a potent issue than the
business in Wall Street, except the seriousness is overshadowed by other issues like
poverty, female feticide in a developing country like India; CPI(Corruption
Perception Index) 2012 Ranking -94/176.
 This paper focuses on production of biodiesel from microalgae which grow on
flue(carbon dioxide) gas and thus a biological method of carbon dioxide
sequestration( biological mitigation).
 The production of algal fuel is through a process called as transesterification.
 CO2 accounts for less than 1% of total atmospheric gases, its about 391ppm by
volume as of 2011. It rose by 2.0ppm per year during 2000–2009.
 The numbers were below 300(ppm) i.e. below 0.03% by volume before
industrialization.
 Due to rapid industrialization and increase in traffic the percentage of carbon dioxide
is also increasing in atmosphere.
 Due to which green house effect is also increasing making earth warmer.(Global
warming).
 Oceans act as a sink for carbon dioxide, so the dissolution of carbon dioxide is
increasing leading to the lowering of pH (Ocean Acidification).
MY INSPIRATION
 Visakhapatnam ( 170 40’ 3” and 170 45’ N and 830 16’ 15” and 830 21’ 30” E), located on east
coast of India, has been a victim of pollution due to rapid industrialization and urbanization
.A number of industries (oil refineries, fertilizer plant, steel industries, polymer factories, zinc
smelter plant , etc) are located in this city of destiny and the traffic is also increasing day by
day, in turn increasing pollution. CO2 is one of the common effluents from these sources
polluting the environment.
 This process of ocean acidification is studied due to CO2 pollution in Visakhapatnam by
collecting sea water samples along the coast in urban area.
 The variation of carbonate & bi- carbonate ion strength due to acidification thereby
understanding decalcification. The pH and concentration of carbonate and bi-carbonate ions
are studied in various samples of sea water collected from December 2010, January – August
2011.
RESULTS
pH of sea water samples collected on December(2010), January to August(2011).
MONTH SAMPLE pH
DEC NO.1 8.14
JAN NO.2 8.14
FEB NO.3 8.14
MAR NO.4 8.14
APR NO.5 8.13
MAY NO.6 8.13
JUN NO.7 8.13
JUL NO.8 8.13
AUG NO.9 8.13
MONTH SAMPLE pH
JUN NO.10 8.11
JUL NO.11 8.12
AUG NO.12 8.12
(Note: These samples were collected on dry days; sample no 5,6,7,8,9
were collected from a different point i.e.in main city)
(Note: These samples were collected after rain)
8.09
8.1
8.11
8.12
8.13
8.14
8.15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
pH
samples
Ph
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTAION OF pH
OF VARIOUS SEA WATER SAMPLES.
RESULTS
SNO concentration
1 95ppm
2 94ppm
3 94ppm
4 94ppm
5 90ppm
6 90ppm
7 90ppm
8 90ppm
9 90ppm
10 84ppm
11 84ppm
12 84ppm
SNO concentration
1 58ppm
2 59ppm
3 59ppm
4 59ppm
5 61ppm
6 61ppm
7 61ppm
8 61ppm
9 61ppm
10 64ppm
11 65ppm
12 65ppm
CARBONATE IONS CONCENTRATION BICARBONATE IONS CONCENTRATION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
concentration
samples
carbonate
bicarbonate
8.09
8.1
8.11
8.12
8.13
8.14
8.15
1 3 5 7 9 11
pH
samples
Ph
ALGAE : BEST SOURCE
 The various sources of biodiesel like: Jatropha plants, maize-food crops are explored
which are first generation bio-diesel sources. There is an ongoing debate which
eludes out the negative impacts of usage of first generation hence, second generation
bio fuel producers are taken into consideration.
 The algae are considered to be best source for bio-diesel. This is due to the lipid
content of microalgae and their extra ordinary potential for cultivation as energy
crops.
 They provide a natural medium for carbon dioxide sequestration and thus decrease
the carbon dioxide percentage in atmosphere, as it is used as a source of nutrients for
their growth. A few microalgae even have the capability to trap the flue gases directly
from industries as nutrients along with sunlight. The contaminants like CO, NOX,
and SOX can be removed by using biodiesel.
 The algae which are used to trap flue gases are green algae Monoruphidium
minutum, Chlorococcum littorale ,a marine algae and Chlorella Strains.
 Chlorococcum littorale shows tolerance up to 40% CO2 and 420c temperatures.
 In terms of carbon savings, the use of microalgae for biodiesel can lower
considerably the CO2 emissions because the CO2 released on combustion should
equal the CO2 fixed during plant or algal photosynthesis and growth.
Crop Crop oil yield (L/acre)
Corn 68.13
Soya bean 181.68
Sunflower 386.07
Rapeseed 480.69
Canola 495.83
Jatropha 788.33
Oil palm 2403.47
Microalgae 19000-57000
Table: showing the yield of biodiesel from micro algae: Comparative study
PROCESS
FLUE
GASES
PHOTO
BIOREACTORS
TRANSESTERIFICATION PROCESS
ADVANTAGES
Eco-friendly.
Algal biodiesel contains no sulphur.
Removal of GHG as they use flue gases for production of biodiesel
The left over residue after extracting biodiesel can be used as manure
for plant growth or other feedstock.
This process shows carbon saving.
Biodiesel is used as a substitute for conventional fuel and thus
decreases the fossil fuel dependency.
CONCLUSIONS
 The production of biodiesel from algae is more economical and eco-
friendly.
 The algal source or secondary source has more oil content than that of
first generation bio-diesel sources like food grains.
The algae are versatile and compatible to harsh conditions hence can
be used to trap the flue gases directly from industries which are rich in
CO2.
 The Ocean acidification is due to increase in CO2 in atmosphere above
the permissible levels which causes decrease in carbonate ion
concentration (decalcification) , as well as decrease in the pH of the
medium.
The micro algae thus can be used as a natural source for carbon
dioxide sequestration.
 Thus, the green cells grown by Carbon dioxide sequestration can be
used to produce bio-diesel by transesterification process.
REFERANCES
 [1]Ormerod WG, Freund P, Smith A, Davison J. Ocean storage of CO2. IEA greenhouse gas R&D programme. UK: International Energy
Agency; 2002.
 [2] Laherrere J. Forecasting production from discovery. In: ASPO; 2005.
 [3]Dewulf J, Van Langenhove H. Renewables-based technology: sustainability assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2006.
 [4] Gilbert R, Perl A. Transport revolutions: moving people and freight without oil. Earthscan; 2008.
 COM (2006) 34 final. An EU strategy for biofuels. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 8.2.2006.
 [4]Bozbas K. Biodiesel as an alternative motor fuel: production and policies in the European Union. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews 2008;12:542–52.
 [5] Scarlat N, Dallemand JF, Pinilla FG. Impact on agricultural land resources of biofuels production and use in the European Union. In:
Bioenergy: challenges and opportunities. International conference and exhibition on bioenergy;
 2008.
 [6]Renewable Fuel Agency (RFA). The Gallagher review of the indirect effects of
 biofuels production; 2008.
 [7] Canakci M, Sanli H. Biodiesel production from various feedstocks and their effects on the fuel properties. Journal of Industrial
Microbiology and Biotechnology2008;35:431–41.
 [8] Reinhardt G, Rettenmaier N, Ko¨ppen S. How sustainable are biofuels for transportation?In: Bioenergy: challenges and opportunities.
International Conference and exhibition on bioenergy; 2008.
 [9] Li Y, Wang B, Wu N, Lan CQ. Effects of nitrogen sources on cell growth and lipid production of Neochloris oleoabundans. Applied
Microbiology and Biotechnology2008;81(4):629–36.
 [10] Li Y, Horsman M, Wu N, Lan CQ, Dubois-Calero N. Biofuels from microalgae.Biotechnology Progress 2008;24(4):815–20.
 [11] Richmond A. Handbook of microalgal culture: biotechnology and applied phycology. Blackwell Science Ltd; 2004.
 [12] Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P. A look back at the U.S.Department of Energy’s aquatic species program: biodiesel from
algae. NREL/TP-580-24190, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA; 1998.
 [13] Aslan S, Kapdan IK. Batch kinetics of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from synthetic wastewater by algae. Ecological Engineering
2006;28(1):64–70.
 [14] Pratoomyot J, Srivilas P, Noiraksar T. Fatty acids composition of 10 microalgal species. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and
Technology 2005;27(6):1179–87.
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 Department of Engineering chemistry, Andhra University College of
Engineering.
 Department of Nuclear physics, Andhra University.
 Department of Chemical Engineering, Andhra University.
 Department of Marine Chemistry, Andhra University.
GO GREEN !!!
PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, PROTECT YOUR SELF

BIO-DIESEL - A GREEN FUEL FROM GREEN CELLS CULTURED ON FLUE GASES.

  • 1.
    S.A.SOMA SEKHAR*, DEPT.OF.ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY,ANDHRA UNIVERSITY. VISAKHAPATNAM (A.P).
  • 2.
    SKELETON INTRODUCTION MY INSPIRATION ALGAE :BEST SOURCE PROCESS ADVANTAGES : ADVOCATE CONCLUSIONS REFERANCES AKNOWLEDGEMENT
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION  The sustainableproduction of alternative sources of fuels is a potent issue than the business in Wall Street, except the seriousness is overshadowed by other issues like poverty, female feticide in a developing country like India; CPI(Corruption Perception Index) 2012 Ranking -94/176.  This paper focuses on production of biodiesel from microalgae which grow on flue(carbon dioxide) gas and thus a biological method of carbon dioxide sequestration( biological mitigation).  The production of algal fuel is through a process called as transesterification.  CO2 accounts for less than 1% of total atmospheric gases, its about 391ppm by volume as of 2011. It rose by 2.0ppm per year during 2000–2009.  The numbers were below 300(ppm) i.e. below 0.03% by volume before industrialization.  Due to rapid industrialization and increase in traffic the percentage of carbon dioxide is also increasing in atmosphere.  Due to which green house effect is also increasing making earth warmer.(Global warming).  Oceans act as a sink for carbon dioxide, so the dissolution of carbon dioxide is increasing leading to the lowering of pH (Ocean Acidification).
  • 4.
    MY INSPIRATION  Visakhapatnam( 170 40’ 3” and 170 45’ N and 830 16’ 15” and 830 21’ 30” E), located on east coast of India, has been a victim of pollution due to rapid industrialization and urbanization .A number of industries (oil refineries, fertilizer plant, steel industries, polymer factories, zinc smelter plant , etc) are located in this city of destiny and the traffic is also increasing day by day, in turn increasing pollution. CO2 is one of the common effluents from these sources polluting the environment.  This process of ocean acidification is studied due to CO2 pollution in Visakhapatnam by collecting sea water samples along the coast in urban area.  The variation of carbonate & bi- carbonate ion strength due to acidification thereby understanding decalcification. The pH and concentration of carbonate and bi-carbonate ions are studied in various samples of sea water collected from December 2010, January – August 2011.
  • 5.
    RESULTS pH of seawater samples collected on December(2010), January to August(2011). MONTH SAMPLE pH DEC NO.1 8.14 JAN NO.2 8.14 FEB NO.3 8.14 MAR NO.4 8.14 APR NO.5 8.13 MAY NO.6 8.13 JUN NO.7 8.13 JUL NO.8 8.13 AUG NO.9 8.13 MONTH SAMPLE pH JUN NO.10 8.11 JUL NO.11 8.12 AUG NO.12 8.12 (Note: These samples were collected on dry days; sample no 5,6,7,8,9 were collected from a different point i.e.in main city) (Note: These samples were collected after rain) 8.09 8.1 8.11 8.12 8.13 8.14 8.15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 pH samples Ph GRAPHICAL REPRESENTAION OF pH OF VARIOUS SEA WATER SAMPLES.
  • 6.
    RESULTS SNO concentration 1 95ppm 294ppm 3 94ppm 4 94ppm 5 90ppm 6 90ppm 7 90ppm 8 90ppm 9 90ppm 10 84ppm 11 84ppm 12 84ppm SNO concentration 1 58ppm 2 59ppm 3 59ppm 4 59ppm 5 61ppm 6 61ppm 7 61ppm 8 61ppm 9 61ppm 10 64ppm 11 65ppm 12 65ppm CARBONATE IONS CONCENTRATION BICARBONATE IONS CONCENTRATION 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 concentration samples carbonate bicarbonate 8.09 8.1 8.11 8.12 8.13 8.14 8.15 1 3 5 7 9 11 pH samples Ph
  • 7.
    ALGAE : BESTSOURCE  The various sources of biodiesel like: Jatropha plants, maize-food crops are explored which are first generation bio-diesel sources. There is an ongoing debate which eludes out the negative impacts of usage of first generation hence, second generation bio fuel producers are taken into consideration.  The algae are considered to be best source for bio-diesel. This is due to the lipid content of microalgae and their extra ordinary potential for cultivation as energy crops.  They provide a natural medium for carbon dioxide sequestration and thus decrease the carbon dioxide percentage in atmosphere, as it is used as a source of nutrients for their growth. A few microalgae even have the capability to trap the flue gases directly from industries as nutrients along with sunlight. The contaminants like CO, NOX, and SOX can be removed by using biodiesel.
  • 8.
     The algaewhich are used to trap flue gases are green algae Monoruphidium minutum, Chlorococcum littorale ,a marine algae and Chlorella Strains.  Chlorococcum littorale shows tolerance up to 40% CO2 and 420c temperatures.  In terms of carbon savings, the use of microalgae for biodiesel can lower considerably the CO2 emissions because the CO2 released on combustion should equal the CO2 fixed during plant or algal photosynthesis and growth. Crop Crop oil yield (L/acre) Corn 68.13 Soya bean 181.68 Sunflower 386.07 Rapeseed 480.69 Canola 495.83 Jatropha 788.33 Oil palm 2403.47 Microalgae 19000-57000 Table: showing the yield of biodiesel from micro algae: Comparative study
  • 9.
  • 10.
    ADVANTAGES Eco-friendly. Algal biodiesel containsno sulphur. Removal of GHG as they use flue gases for production of biodiesel The left over residue after extracting biodiesel can be used as manure for plant growth or other feedstock. This process shows carbon saving. Biodiesel is used as a substitute for conventional fuel and thus decreases the fossil fuel dependency.
  • 11.
    CONCLUSIONS  The productionof biodiesel from algae is more economical and eco- friendly.  The algal source or secondary source has more oil content than that of first generation bio-diesel sources like food grains. The algae are versatile and compatible to harsh conditions hence can be used to trap the flue gases directly from industries which are rich in CO2.  The Ocean acidification is due to increase in CO2 in atmosphere above the permissible levels which causes decrease in carbonate ion concentration (decalcification) , as well as decrease in the pH of the medium. The micro algae thus can be used as a natural source for carbon dioxide sequestration.  Thus, the green cells grown by Carbon dioxide sequestration can be used to produce bio-diesel by transesterification process.
  • 12.
    REFERANCES  [1]Ormerod WG,Freund P, Smith A, Davison J. Ocean storage of CO2. IEA greenhouse gas R&D programme. UK: International Energy Agency; 2002.  [2] Laherrere J. Forecasting production from discovery. In: ASPO; 2005.  [3]Dewulf J, Van Langenhove H. Renewables-based technology: sustainability assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2006.  [4] Gilbert R, Perl A. Transport revolutions: moving people and freight without oil. Earthscan; 2008.  COM (2006) 34 final. An EU strategy for biofuels. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 8.2.2006.  [4]Bozbas K. Biodiesel as an alternative motor fuel: production and policies in the European Union. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2008;12:542–52.  [5] Scarlat N, Dallemand JF, Pinilla FG. Impact on agricultural land resources of biofuels production and use in the European Union. In: Bioenergy: challenges and opportunities. International conference and exhibition on bioenergy;  2008.  [6]Renewable Fuel Agency (RFA). The Gallagher review of the indirect effects of  biofuels production; 2008.  [7] Canakci M, Sanli H. Biodiesel production from various feedstocks and their effects on the fuel properties. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology2008;35:431–41.  [8] Reinhardt G, Rettenmaier N, Ko¨ppen S. How sustainable are biofuels for transportation?In: Bioenergy: challenges and opportunities. International Conference and exhibition on bioenergy; 2008.  [9] Li Y, Wang B, Wu N, Lan CQ. Effects of nitrogen sources on cell growth and lipid production of Neochloris oleoabundans. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology2008;81(4):629–36.  [10] Li Y, Horsman M, Wu N, Lan CQ, Dubois-Calero N. Biofuels from microalgae.Biotechnology Progress 2008;24(4):815–20.  [11] Richmond A. Handbook of microalgal culture: biotechnology and applied phycology. Blackwell Science Ltd; 2004.  [12] Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P. A look back at the U.S.Department of Energy’s aquatic species program: biodiesel from algae. NREL/TP-580-24190, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA; 1998.  [13] Aslan S, Kapdan IK. Batch kinetics of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from synthetic wastewater by algae. Ecological Engineering 2006;28(1):64–70.  [14] Pratoomyot J, Srivilas P, Noiraksar T. Fatty acids composition of 10 microalgal species. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 2005;27(6):1179–87.
  • 13.
    AKNOWLEDGEMENTS  Department ofEngineering chemistry, Andhra University College of Engineering.  Department of Nuclear physics, Andhra University.  Department of Chemical Engineering, Andhra University.  Department of Marine Chemistry, Andhra University.
  • 14.
    GO GREEN !!! PROTECTENVIRONMENT, PROTECT YOUR SELF