The document summarizes the RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs. It discusses the UK government's push for transparency in publicly funded research and the Finch Report recommendations supporting open access. The RCUK policy implements these recommendations by requiring publications stemming from RCUK funding to be made openly accessible, with a preference for open access publishing with a CC-BY license ("gold") and guidelines for acceptable embargo periods when "green" open access is used instead. The policy aims to maximize access, sharing and reuse of publicly funded research outputs.
Scholarly Communications Model Policy and Licence: Publishers' Association Co...Chris Banks
Responses from the UK-SCL Steering Group to a second letter from the Publishers' Association about a revision of the UK-SCL model policy which took into account concerns that publishers had raised with us. The first letter is here: https://www.slideshare.net/chrisabanks/scholarly-communications-model-policy-and-licence-publishers-association-concerns-together-with-ukscl-steering-group-responses
United Kingdom Scholarly Communications model policy and Licence - UK-SCL - u...Chris Banks
United Kingdom Scholarly Communications model policy and licence. A presentation which sets the context for the UK model university open access policy based on the Harvard model policy
Talk to Heads of University Biological Sciences Departments WInter Meeting 10 November 2011.
http://www.societyofbiology.org/newsandevents/events/view/327
Scholarly Communications Model Policy and Licence: Publishers' Association Co...Chris Banks
Responses to recent concerns raised by the Publishers' Association about plans to introduce a model open access policy for UK Higher Education Institutions in order to simplify the complex funder and publisher policy environment currently experienced by UK academics.
Social sciences directory liber conference (26.06.2013)SocSciDir
A presentation given by Dan Scott, the founder of 'gold' Open Access publisher Social Sciences Directory Limited, as part of the workshop "Innovative Open Access Publishing Initiatives - and how Libraries/Library Consortia could support such initiatives" at the LIBER conference in Munich, 26th June 2013
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
Scholarly Communications Model Policy and Licence: Publishers' Association Co...Chris Banks
Responses from the UK-SCL Steering Group to a second letter from the Publishers' Association about a revision of the UK-SCL model policy which took into account concerns that publishers had raised with us. The first letter is here: https://www.slideshare.net/chrisabanks/scholarly-communications-model-policy-and-licence-publishers-association-concerns-together-with-ukscl-steering-group-responses
United Kingdom Scholarly Communications model policy and Licence - UK-SCL - u...Chris Banks
United Kingdom Scholarly Communications model policy and licence. A presentation which sets the context for the UK model university open access policy based on the Harvard model policy
Talk to Heads of University Biological Sciences Departments WInter Meeting 10 November 2011.
http://www.societyofbiology.org/newsandevents/events/view/327
Scholarly Communications Model Policy and Licence: Publishers' Association Co...Chris Banks
Responses to recent concerns raised by the Publishers' Association about plans to introduce a model open access policy for UK Higher Education Institutions in order to simplify the complex funder and publisher policy environment currently experienced by UK academics.
Social sciences directory liber conference (26.06.2013)SocSciDir
A presentation given by Dan Scott, the founder of 'gold' Open Access publisher Social Sciences Directory Limited, as part of the workshop "Innovative Open Access Publishing Initiatives - and how Libraries/Library Consortia could support such initiatives" at the LIBER conference in Munich, 26th June 2013
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
Presentation by the RIN's Director, Michael Jubb, at the Spanish Research Council's (CSIC) workshop on the politics of the promotion of open access in Barcelona in March 2010. http://www.csic.es/web/guest/home
Open Access in the UK - challenges of compliance with funder mandatesChris Banks
This was a presentation given at the LIBER2014 conference in Riga.
See http://liber2014.wp.lnb.lv/programme/papers/abstracts-and-biographies/#ChrisBanks for an abstract and biography.
A research institution's view of their role in OA mandates and policies: Usin...enlightenrepository
Brief presentation on Insitutional and Funder Mandates as part of the Berlin 7 Session: Practical challenges in moving to Open Access: a focus on research funders and universities
Whose Property Is It Anyway? Part 2: The Challenges in Supporting the UK’s Ma...LIBER Europe
Whose Property Is It Anyway? Part 2: The Challenges in Supporting the UK’s Main Research Funder Agendas which Seek to Ensure that the Outputs from Publicly-Funded Research are Published Open Access
Chris Banks, Imperial College London, UK. This presentation was one of the 10 most highly ranked at LIBER's Annual Conference 2014 in Riga, Latvia. Learn more: www.libereurope.eu
This Webinar will provide delegates with an overview of the Wellcome Trust and RCUK OA policies. It will discuss current levels of compliance, and key issues which need to be addressed if full OA is going to be realised. The Webinar will also discuss the recent study, led by the Wellcome Trust, which looked at what levers funders could pull to help encourage the development of an effective OA market for article processing charges.
The greatest possible impact: The Wellcome Trust and open researchUoLResearchSupport
Research funders are increasingly recognising the importance of open research practices, to increase the reach and impact of their funded research and to ensure the integrity of research results.
The Wellcome Trust have been leading efforts to make research more open for more than 20 years, ever since working to make sure the results of the Human Genome Project were released immediately into the public domain. They were also the first research funder to introduce a mandatory open access policy, with more than 150 global research funders having since followed their lead. More recently, they have developed the Wellcome Open Research platform, which allow their researchers to rapidly publish and share their findings openly and transparently, and encourage researchers to cite preprints in their grant applications.
On Thursday 17th June we welcome Sonya Towers, Grants Adviser - Immunobiology and Infectious Disease at the Wellcome Trust, to discuss Wellcome’s approach to open research including their Output Management Plan pilot on which they are liaising with the University of Leeds.
Samantha Robertson - NHMRC Perspectives on Increasing Access to Data from Pub...Wiley
Governments and industries all over the world are tackling the challenges and opportunities of ‘Big Data’. In view of these challenges, the key drivers of change in this area are the behaviour of researchers, the introduction of incentives or rewards and funding for data sharing infrastructure. Governments and taxpayers also expect a return on investment from the money spent on publically funded research. Building on and learning from the successes (and failures) of others need to be part of the research vernacular. Issues such as open access, data curation, handling of data, and sharing of that data are all matters on which the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has an interest in. NHMRC works with the sector to develop best practise policies on such matters.
Samantha Robertson
Executive Director, NHMRC Evidence, Advice & Governance
Presented at the 2015 Wiley Publishing Seminar, 5 November, Melbourne, Australia.
OSFair2017 Training | Designing & implementing open access, open data & open ...Open Science Fair
Eloy Rodrigues, José Carvalho & Pedro Príncipe talk about designing & implementing Open Access, Open Data & Open Science policies.
Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond
Workshop overview:
This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks.
DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5
Presentation by the RIN's Director, Michael Jubb, at the Spanish Research Council's (CSIC) workshop on the politics of the promotion of open access in Barcelona in March 2010. http://www.csic.es/web/guest/home
Open Access in the UK - challenges of compliance with funder mandatesChris Banks
This was a presentation given at the LIBER2014 conference in Riga.
See http://liber2014.wp.lnb.lv/programme/papers/abstracts-and-biographies/#ChrisBanks for an abstract and biography.
A research institution's view of their role in OA mandates and policies: Usin...enlightenrepository
Brief presentation on Insitutional and Funder Mandates as part of the Berlin 7 Session: Practical challenges in moving to Open Access: a focus on research funders and universities
Whose Property Is It Anyway? Part 2: The Challenges in Supporting the UK’s Ma...LIBER Europe
Whose Property Is It Anyway? Part 2: The Challenges in Supporting the UK’s Main Research Funder Agendas which Seek to Ensure that the Outputs from Publicly-Funded Research are Published Open Access
Chris Banks, Imperial College London, UK. This presentation was one of the 10 most highly ranked at LIBER's Annual Conference 2014 in Riga, Latvia. Learn more: www.libereurope.eu
This Webinar will provide delegates with an overview of the Wellcome Trust and RCUK OA policies. It will discuss current levels of compliance, and key issues which need to be addressed if full OA is going to be realised. The Webinar will also discuss the recent study, led by the Wellcome Trust, which looked at what levers funders could pull to help encourage the development of an effective OA market for article processing charges.
The greatest possible impact: The Wellcome Trust and open researchUoLResearchSupport
Research funders are increasingly recognising the importance of open research practices, to increase the reach and impact of their funded research and to ensure the integrity of research results.
The Wellcome Trust have been leading efforts to make research more open for more than 20 years, ever since working to make sure the results of the Human Genome Project were released immediately into the public domain. They were also the first research funder to introduce a mandatory open access policy, with more than 150 global research funders having since followed their lead. More recently, they have developed the Wellcome Open Research platform, which allow their researchers to rapidly publish and share their findings openly and transparently, and encourage researchers to cite preprints in their grant applications.
On Thursday 17th June we welcome Sonya Towers, Grants Adviser - Immunobiology and Infectious Disease at the Wellcome Trust, to discuss Wellcome’s approach to open research including their Output Management Plan pilot on which they are liaising with the University of Leeds.
Samantha Robertson - NHMRC Perspectives on Increasing Access to Data from Pub...Wiley
Governments and industries all over the world are tackling the challenges and opportunities of ‘Big Data’. In view of these challenges, the key drivers of change in this area are the behaviour of researchers, the introduction of incentives or rewards and funding for data sharing infrastructure. Governments and taxpayers also expect a return on investment from the money spent on publically funded research. Building on and learning from the successes (and failures) of others need to be part of the research vernacular. Issues such as open access, data curation, handling of data, and sharing of that data are all matters on which the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has an interest in. NHMRC works with the sector to develop best practise policies on such matters.
Samantha Robertson
Executive Director, NHMRC Evidence, Advice & Governance
Presented at the 2015 Wiley Publishing Seminar, 5 November, Melbourne, Australia.
OSFair2017 Training | Designing & implementing open access, open data & open ...Open Science Fair
Eloy Rodrigues, José Carvalho & Pedro Príncipe talk about designing & implementing Open Access, Open Data & Open Science policies.
Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond
Workshop overview:
This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks.
DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5
Presentation at the American Association of Publishers Professional and Scholarly Publishing Division conference in February 2016 on the coming cost of open access compliance, and how we can reduce it
UK and US positions on open access – Steven Hill, HEFCE and Sarah Thomas, Harvard University
University of California and university digital library costing models – MacKenzie Smith, UC Davis
Total cost of ownership and flipped OA – Liam Earney, Jisc
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
The benefits and challenges of open access: lessons from practice - Helen Bla...Jisc
Led by Helen Blanchett, subject specialist, scholarly communications, Jisc.
With contribution from Andrew Simpson, associate university librarian (procurement and metadata and systems), Portsmouth University.
In this session you’ll hear in this session you’ll hear about the benefits and challenges of open access.
Connect more in London, 28 June 2016
Nick Woolley, Director of Library Services - Sheffield Hallam University
In October 2022, as part of a strategic commitment to Open Research, Sheffield Hallam University’s new institutional policy for research publication and copyright, based on rights retention, came into effect.
As part of its role to provide access to knowledge, Hallam’s library led a partnership between the University’s research community and professional services to develop this new policy and implement rights retention as a new practice. This transformation in Hallam’s approach to copyright and scholarly communication took place alongside the development of UK HE sector requirements for transitional agreements and negotiation with publishers.
In this presentation, Nick Woolley (Director of Library and Campus Services) will share how the policy was developed and implemented and what the experience has been so far, including insight from the first six months of activity and data. Nick will show how Hallam’s policy is already making a positive impact on scholarly communication and argue why rights retention as disruptive innovation is relevant for all institutions who create knowledge.
Lightning Talk Session 2: Achieving 100% Open Access to Research Publications
Students as Scholars – Participation in Open Research and Publishing Practices: The Case of the Communications Undergraduate Journal at Dublin City University
presented by Ronan Cox, Dublin City University;
5 Years of HRB Open Research in 5 Minutes
presented by Hannah Wilson, F1000;
National Open Access Repositories: Strengthen and Align Ireland’s Network of Open Access Repositories
presented by Christopher Loughnane, University of Galway;
The National Open Access Monitor Project
presented by Catherine Ferris, IReL.
Incentives for sharing research data – Veerle Van den Eynden, UK Data Service
Incentives to innovate – Joe Marshall, NCUB
Incentives in university collaboration - Tim Lance, NYSERNET
Giving researchers credit for their data – Neil Jefferies, The Bodleian Digital Library Systems and Services (BDLSS)
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
Open Access refers to unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research outputs via the Internet, free of charge and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions.
Open Access is also often referred to as Gold or Green.
Open access presentation at Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscienceopenaccesskcl
Open Access presentation delivered on the 8th October 2014 at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience.
Presenters are Lynne Meehan (Research Support Manager) and Helen Cargill (Digital Assets Manager)
How do we find our way through the forest of requirements, options, exemptions, variations and special cases that institutions and individuals have to handle with Open Access policies? The Open Access policy environment is growing more complex and more demanding in its needs, and now more significant in its implications.
Encouraging Openness and how stakeholder policies can support or block it!"CIARD Movement
Funders, authors and readers may want open access to research, but can they achieve it? A researcher who has been encouraged to make their work open has to deal with regulations, guidance, and mandates from their institution, their funders, their publisher and their national government. These policies are often complex and can be ambiguous, or in conflict with each other.
A supportive policy environment and guidance through the relationship of one policy to another has proved to be essential for real progress in opening access to research. How should policies support the researcher and the research process? How can policies based on commercial profit fit into an open environment? What role do funders have in protecting their investment and the public interest?
Presented by Bill Hubbard
Bill Hubbard is the Director of the Centre for Research Communications (CRC) at the University of Nottingham, incorporating the work of SHERPA. The CRC has a portfolio of Open Access projects and services and is a recognised centre of expertise for OA development, policy, repositories and infrastructure.
Bill created the award-winning OA services RoMEO, JULIET and OpenDOAR, which are used around the world to unpick details of stakeholder policies, development policy and which underpin repository use. The CRC have also recently launched FACT, to support researchers in complying with specific RCUK and Wellcome Trust OA polices. Bill has also worked closely with OA publishers and advised on the transitions involved for commercial publishers from traditional to OA business models.
Similar to Ben Ryan: Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs (20)
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
3. Summary
• Setting the scene – the journey since 2005.
• The UK Government’s transparency
agenda.
• The Finch report and recommendations.
• The RCUK Policy.
• A partnership with publishers.
4. Research is essential to the growth, prosperity
and wellbeing of the UK. Ensuring the widest
possible access to research, both within and
outside of the research community, will mean
that the ground-breaking discoveries made in
science and research can have a greater impact
on our lives.
Doug Kell, Chief Executive, BBSRC
RCUK Executive Group ‘Champion’ for Information
May 2011.
5. RCUK Position Statement - 2005
• Four key principles:
– Accessibility to publicly-funded research.
– Rigorous quality assurance.
– Efficient and cost-effective access mechanisms.
– Long-term preservation and accessibility of outputs.
6. RCUK Key Principles
• Accessibility to publicly-funded research;
– Ideas and knowledge derived from publicly-funded
research must be made available and accessible
for public use, interrogation and scrutiny, as widely,
rapidly and effectively as practicable.
• Rigorous quality assurance;
• Efficient and cost-effective access mechanisms;
• Long-term preservation and accessibility of
outputs.
7. RCUK Key Principles
• Accessibility to publicly-funded research;
• Rigorous quality assurance;
– Published research outputs must be subject to
rigorous quality assurance, through effective peer
review mechanisms.
• Efficient and cost-effective access mechanisms;
• Long-term preservation and accessibility of
outputs.
8. Which means …..?
• Research outputs must be accessible to
enable exploitation.
• Research funders have a responsibility to
ensure accessibility.
• Dissemination is part of the research process
and has to be paid for.
• Publishers have a key role to play in the
process.
9. Implementation since 2005
• Individual Research Council policies:
– required that ‘current’ copyright and licensing
policies, such as embargo periods, are
maintained by publishers and respected by
authors.
• Overall, poor compliance:
– Sub-optimal funding mechanisms.
– Authors don’t do deposit in repositories.
– Lack of compliance monitoring.
10. Transparency agenda
Transparency is at the heart of the
Government’s agenda, and this also applies to
published research. In a recent discussion with
members of the research community and
publishers I stressed the importance of open
access to this information for everyone, and I’m
delighted that the Research Councils and
HEFCE have committed to taking this forward.
David Willetts
Minister of State for Universities and Science,
May 2011.
11. Growing openness
• UK Government’s commitment to openness and
transparency.
• Make the results of publicly funded research open,
accessible and exploitable.
• Transparency and openness to drive innovation
and growth.
Get the stuff out there
and get it used!
12. The Finch Working Group
• The task … recommend how to develop a model,
which would be both effective and sustainable over
time, for expanding access to the published findings
of research.
• The report:
Accessibility, sustainability, excellence:
how to expand access to research publications
“The product of a year’s work by a committed and
knowledgeable group of individuals drawn from
academia, research funders and publishing”
13. The Finch Report
• A consensus report.
• Acknowledges that Open Access to publicly
funded research is a good thing: for research,
innovation growth and transparency.
• Notes that Open Access has achieved a
momentum that will continue.
• Addresses the question of how best to manage
the transition in the UK.
• Positions the UK as a leader;
14. Key recommendations for RCUK
• Policy support for publishing in OA and hybrid
journals, including establishing more flexible and
effective arrangements to meet costs.
• Eliminate/minimise restrictions on use/re-use.
• Negotiations on subscriptions to take into account
the shift to open access.
• Funders’ limitations on embargoes to be
considered carefully.
• Clear requirements on universities to establish
publication funds and associated policies.
15. Key recommendations for RCUK
• Policy support for publishing in OA and hybrid
journals, including establishing more flexible and
A mixed
effective arrangements to meet costs;
• Eliminate/minimise restrictions on use/re-use;
• Negotiations on subscriptions to take into account
reception!
the shift to open access;
• Funders’ limitations on embargoes to be
considered carefully;
• Clear requirements on universities to establish
publication funds and associated policies.
16. RCUK Policy on Access to
Research Outputs
• Developed in parallel with and
informed by the recommendations of
Finch.
• RCUK implementation of
Government’s policy.
• Formally announced 16th July 2012.
17. RCUK Policy
• Defines what RCUK means by Open Access.
• States RCUK’s expectations of Researchers and
the publication options available to them.
• Sets out criteria for assessing whether any
particular Journal complies with the policy.
• Applies to all peer-reviewed research publications
submitted for publication from 1st April 2013.
Wholly or partial funded by Research Councils.
18. And more ….
• Authors must include:
– Details of funding that supported the research;
– Statement on how the underlying research
materials – data, samples & models – can be
accessed.
• This has been overlooked in the gold vs green
discussion of the policy. Key role of publishers
to enforce.
19. RCUK definition of ‘Open Access’
Unrestricted, on-line access to peer reviewed and
published scholarly research papers.
Specifically a user must be able to do the following free of
any publisher-imposed access charge:
1. Read published research papers in an electronic format.
2. Search for and re-use (including download) the content.
Allows unrestricted use of manual and automated text and
data mining tools, as well as unrestricted re-use of content
with proper attribution (as defined by CC-BY).
20. Journal compliance
• Gold with CC-BY
– Or (if the publisher will not offer Gold CC-BY)
they must offer:
• Green (at least post print) with a
maximum embargo period of 6 (12)
months, and CC-BY-NC.
21. Funding
• Research Councils will provide funding for
APCs through block grants to institutions.
• Institutions must establish Publication Funds
and the processes and procedures for payment
of APCs.
• Announcement soon on size of fund and the
mechanism to distribute it between institutions.
• ‘Light touch’ guidance – use the money to best
deliver RCUK Policy.
22. Policy in a nut-shell
• Authors must publish in a RCUK Open Access
compliant journal.
• Journal achieves compliance through
- Gold CC-BY, else
- Green, 6 (12) months, post-print, CC-BY-NC.
• RCUK preference is for Gold.
The choice is with Authors and their institutions.
23. The forgotten policy bits ….
• Acknowledgement of funding.
• Statement on access to the underlying research
materials.
…they help support the transparency, integrity and
robustness of the research process:
Science’s powerful capacity for self-correction
comes from this openness to scrutiny and challenge.
Science as an open enterprise
Royal Society, June 2012.
24. Role of publishers
• Any journal which values the quality of its ‘brand’
should require, as mandatory, statements in any
paper on funding and research materials.
• Where Research Council funds are paying an
APC, we are buying a service from a publisher:
– CC-BY
– Funding and research materials statement
– Prompt publication
– Deposit in named repository.
25. Next steps
• Announcement on APC funding mechanism
(Autumn);
• Engagement with universities about
implementation of policy, especially on guidelines
for how funds can be used (Autumn);
• Production of revised guidance of what the policy
means and choice of gold vs green (asap).
26. Further information
• RCUK Policy
http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/Pages/outputs.aspx
• Finch Group report
http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-
Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf
• Royal Society Report
http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/science-public-enterprise/report/
openaccess@rcuk.ac.uk
Hefty - 140 pagesQuote is from Foreword by Janet FinchPublished 18 June 2012Govt. Response 16 July
Some (but not RCUK) have questioned the ‘balance’ of the report, believing it to be unduly favourable to some stakeholdersNo simple answer - had there been then no need for Report!. Different constituencies, legitimately different interests and prioritiesCompromise not perfect from any individual perspectiveUnited by commitment to an acceptable and sustainable future.