Presentation at the American Association of Publishers Professional and Scholarly Publishing Division conference in February 2016 on the coming cost of open access compliance, and how we can reduce it
Amy Friedlander's presentation to the PSP annual conference, February 2016. The topic is compliance with regulations concerning publishing the results of government-funded research.
Presentation given at the British Library Turing workshop on Software Citation, considering what lessons could be learned from the world of data citation
Presentation on data citations for publishers, given by Jez Cope, Data Services Lead at the British Library/Crossref workshop in London on 5 February 2019.
This presentation was provided by Adam Rusbridge of EDINA during a NISO webinar on the topic of Providing Access: Ensuring What Libraries Have Licensed is What Users Can Reach on Feb 8, 2017
Images, Reviews, Tags and Recommendations: do enhanced contents and user contributed contents improve access to library resources in an academic library?
Ya Wang, San Francisco State University Leonard Library
Presented at the 2010 Electronic Resources & Libraries Conference.
Abstract: This presentation allows San Francisco State University to share our information about patron usage of catalog enhanced services and a journal article recommendation service. The presentation looks at features offered by Syndetic Solutions and LibraryThing added to our online library catalog. We also evaluate the bX article recommendation service from Ex Libris. A summary of usage statistics is included.
Has anyone seen my data? Incentivising #opendata sharing with altmetricsNick Sheppard
As an important component of the scholarly record, research data, software and code are increasingly managed as research outputs in their own right, though are not typically subject to peer review.
In line with the broader ‘open research’ movement there is a growing impetus for datasets, software and code to be curated in repositories, openly available wherever possible subject to relevant legal and ethical constraints.
Data repositories such as Figshare, Dryad and Zenodo routinely allocate DOIs for deposited data while many universities in the UK also allocate and mint DOIs in their nascent institutionally based data repositories through Datacite which means they will be automatically tracked by altmetric.com in the same way as journal articles.
While the repository infrastructure continues to develop and there are pockets of best practice, data sharing and reuse is not yet fully established across UK HE. Reward mechanisms are immature and data citation, for example, is limited and not easy to track. Clarivate Analytics’ Data Citation Index coverage of UK based repositories is still relatively low and, as a subscription based product, is not widely accessible. COUNTER compliant downloads can be derived from IRUSdata-UK (beta) which currently tracks 27 UK based institutional data repositories.
Altmetrics therefore offers a low barrier method to track engagement with datasets and, in lieu of a more formal process, might be regarded as a type of informal peer review. We have undertaken a preliminary analysis of repositories that participate in IRUSdata-UK (beta) using it as a source of DOIs to run against the altmetric.com API to discover to what extent research data, software and code is being shared.
This talk will present these preliminary results and explore how and why datasets are being shared across the various platforms tracked by altmetric.com and potential barriers. It will consider how data repository managers can encourage and facilitate data sharing through social media networks, blogs and “data journalism” and will draw on the Research Data Management (RDM) Engagement Award at the University of Leeds which is exploring linking RDM with the Open Science movement via the Wikimedia suite of tools. What does the altmetric data currently tell us about how research data is being linked to this global platform
Amy Friedlander's presentation to the PSP annual conference, February 2016. The topic is compliance with regulations concerning publishing the results of government-funded research.
Presentation given at the British Library Turing workshop on Software Citation, considering what lessons could be learned from the world of data citation
Presentation on data citations for publishers, given by Jez Cope, Data Services Lead at the British Library/Crossref workshop in London on 5 February 2019.
This presentation was provided by Adam Rusbridge of EDINA during a NISO webinar on the topic of Providing Access: Ensuring What Libraries Have Licensed is What Users Can Reach on Feb 8, 2017
Images, Reviews, Tags and Recommendations: do enhanced contents and user contributed contents improve access to library resources in an academic library?
Ya Wang, San Francisco State University Leonard Library
Presented at the 2010 Electronic Resources & Libraries Conference.
Abstract: This presentation allows San Francisco State University to share our information about patron usage of catalog enhanced services and a journal article recommendation service. The presentation looks at features offered by Syndetic Solutions and LibraryThing added to our online library catalog. We also evaluate the bX article recommendation service from Ex Libris. A summary of usage statistics is included.
Has anyone seen my data? Incentivising #opendata sharing with altmetricsNick Sheppard
As an important component of the scholarly record, research data, software and code are increasingly managed as research outputs in their own right, though are not typically subject to peer review.
In line with the broader ‘open research’ movement there is a growing impetus for datasets, software and code to be curated in repositories, openly available wherever possible subject to relevant legal and ethical constraints.
Data repositories such as Figshare, Dryad and Zenodo routinely allocate DOIs for deposited data while many universities in the UK also allocate and mint DOIs in their nascent institutionally based data repositories through Datacite which means they will be automatically tracked by altmetric.com in the same way as journal articles.
While the repository infrastructure continues to develop and there are pockets of best practice, data sharing and reuse is not yet fully established across UK HE. Reward mechanisms are immature and data citation, for example, is limited and not easy to track. Clarivate Analytics’ Data Citation Index coverage of UK based repositories is still relatively low and, as a subscription based product, is not widely accessible. COUNTER compliant downloads can be derived from IRUSdata-UK (beta) which currently tracks 27 UK based institutional data repositories.
Altmetrics therefore offers a low barrier method to track engagement with datasets and, in lieu of a more formal process, might be regarded as a type of informal peer review. We have undertaken a preliminary analysis of repositories that participate in IRUSdata-UK (beta) using it as a source of DOIs to run against the altmetric.com API to discover to what extent research data, software and code is being shared.
This talk will present these preliminary results and explore how and why datasets are being shared across the various platforms tracked by altmetric.com and potential barriers. It will consider how data repository managers can encourage and facilitate data sharing through social media networks, blogs and “data journalism” and will draw on the Research Data Management (RDM) Engagement Award at the University of Leeds which is exploring linking RDM with the Open Science movement via the Wikimedia suite of tools. What does the altmetric data currently tell us about how research data is being linked to this global platform
RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...ASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2016
Atlanta, GA
May 4-7, 2016
Lightning Rounds (Thursday, May 5)
Presenter:
Ana Van Gulick, Carnegie Mellon University
RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...ASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2016
Atlanta, GA
May 4-7, 2016
Lightning Rounds (Thursday, May 5)
Presenter:
Matthew Spitzer, Center for Open Science
Presentation on data sharing that outlines five layers that must be addressed to enable data to be located, obtained, access, understood and use, and cited.
OpenAIRE Guidelines for data providers: new Metadata Application Profile for ...OpenAIRE
Presentation at the "OpenAIRE webinar series for repository managers 2017/2018" - Nov. 14, 2017 (11h00 CET) | "OpenAIRE Guidelines for data providers: new Metadata Application Profile for Literature Repositories", presented by Jochen Schirrwagen, Univ. Bielefeld.
Data publishing from the viewpoint of a biodiversity publisherVince Smith
Lyubomir Penev, Vishwas Chavan, Gregor Hagedorn, Daniel Mietchen, Teodor Georgiev, David Roberts, Vincent Smith. 2011. Data publishing from the viewpoint of a biodiversity publisher. TDWG 2011 Annual Conference, Data Citation Workshop at the Astor Crown Plaza Hotel, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 16 - 21st October 2011.
UK Research Data Discovery Service metadata schemaJisc RDM
An overview of the metadata schema being developed for the UK research data discovery service. Dom Fripp at the Research Data Network event at Cardiff University, May 2016.
OpenAIRE guidelines and broker service for repository managers - OpenAIRE #OA...OpenAIRE
Presentation by Pedro Principe and Paolo Manghi at the OpenAIRE Open Access week webinar. Friday October 28, 2016. Webinar on Openaire compatibility guidelines and the dashboard for Repository Managers, with Pedro Principe (University of Minho) and Paolo Manghi (CNR/ISTI).
This presentation was provided by Violeta Ilik of Northwestern University during the NISO Virtual Conference held on Feb 15, 2017, entitled Institutional Repositories: Ensuring Yours is Populated, Useful and Thriving. The DOI for this presentation is http://dx.doi.org/10.18131/G3VP6R
This presentation was given during the ALA 2016 NISO Standards Update on June 26, 2016. The presenter is Marlene Van Ballegoie of the University of Toronto
A presentation on FAIR, FAIRsharing and the FAIR ecosystem for the ENVRI-FAIR community on the 13th December 2019. This presentation covers the basics of what FAIR is, how FAIRsharing can help 'FAIRify' standards, repositories, knowledgebases and data policies, and then the connections FAIRsharing has with other initiatives, such as the FAIR Evaluator, Data Stewardship Wizard, our RDA WG, GO-FAIR and EOSC-Life.
This presentation by David Wilcox was part of the NISO Virtual Conference, held on Feb 15, 2017, entitled Institutional Repositories: Ensuring Yours Is Populated, Useful and Thriving.
Presentation slides from a talk by Gareth Knight which discussed the need to consider data sharing activities in academic citizenship, different approaches that may be taken to publish data associated with publications, and the opportunities presented by data journals
RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...ASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2016
Atlanta, GA
May 4-7, 2016
Lightning Rounds (Thursday, May 5)
Presenter:
Ana Van Gulick, Carnegie Mellon University
RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...ASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2016
Atlanta, GA
May 4-7, 2016
Lightning Rounds (Thursday, May 5)
Presenter:
Matthew Spitzer, Center for Open Science
Presentation on data sharing that outlines five layers that must be addressed to enable data to be located, obtained, access, understood and use, and cited.
OpenAIRE Guidelines for data providers: new Metadata Application Profile for ...OpenAIRE
Presentation at the "OpenAIRE webinar series for repository managers 2017/2018" - Nov. 14, 2017 (11h00 CET) | "OpenAIRE Guidelines for data providers: new Metadata Application Profile for Literature Repositories", presented by Jochen Schirrwagen, Univ. Bielefeld.
Data publishing from the viewpoint of a biodiversity publisherVince Smith
Lyubomir Penev, Vishwas Chavan, Gregor Hagedorn, Daniel Mietchen, Teodor Georgiev, David Roberts, Vincent Smith. 2011. Data publishing from the viewpoint of a biodiversity publisher. TDWG 2011 Annual Conference, Data Citation Workshop at the Astor Crown Plaza Hotel, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 16 - 21st October 2011.
UK Research Data Discovery Service metadata schemaJisc RDM
An overview of the metadata schema being developed for the UK research data discovery service. Dom Fripp at the Research Data Network event at Cardiff University, May 2016.
OpenAIRE guidelines and broker service for repository managers - OpenAIRE #OA...OpenAIRE
Presentation by Pedro Principe and Paolo Manghi at the OpenAIRE Open Access week webinar. Friday October 28, 2016. Webinar on Openaire compatibility guidelines and the dashboard for Repository Managers, with Pedro Principe (University of Minho) and Paolo Manghi (CNR/ISTI).
This presentation was provided by Violeta Ilik of Northwestern University during the NISO Virtual Conference held on Feb 15, 2017, entitled Institutional Repositories: Ensuring Yours is Populated, Useful and Thriving. The DOI for this presentation is http://dx.doi.org/10.18131/G3VP6R
This presentation was given during the ALA 2016 NISO Standards Update on June 26, 2016. The presenter is Marlene Van Ballegoie of the University of Toronto
A presentation on FAIR, FAIRsharing and the FAIR ecosystem for the ENVRI-FAIR community on the 13th December 2019. This presentation covers the basics of what FAIR is, how FAIRsharing can help 'FAIRify' standards, repositories, knowledgebases and data policies, and then the connections FAIRsharing has with other initiatives, such as the FAIR Evaluator, Data Stewardship Wizard, our RDA WG, GO-FAIR and EOSC-Life.
This presentation by David Wilcox was part of the NISO Virtual Conference, held on Feb 15, 2017, entitled Institutional Repositories: Ensuring Yours Is Populated, Useful and Thriving.
Presentation slides from a talk by Gareth Knight which discussed the need to consider data sharing activities in academic citizenship, different approaches that may be taken to publish data associated with publications, and the opportunities presented by data journals
Open access presentation at Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscienceopenaccesskcl
Open Access presentation delivered on the 8th October 2014 at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience.
Presenters are Lynne Meehan (Research Support Manager) and Helen Cargill (Digital Assets Manager)
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
This presentation by Judith Coffey Russell, Dean of University Libraries, University of Florida and Alicia Wise, Director of Universal Access, Elsevier describes expanding access to publications by University of Florida authors through the university's institutional repository using ScienceDirect supplied data and links. See the webcast at https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/9995/125071.
Encouraging Openness and how stakeholder policies can support or block it!"CIARD Movement
Funders, authors and readers may want open access to research, but can they achieve it? A researcher who has been encouraged to make their work open has to deal with regulations, guidance, and mandates from their institution, their funders, their publisher and their national government. These policies are often complex and can be ambiguous, or in conflict with each other.
A supportive policy environment and guidance through the relationship of one policy to another has proved to be essential for real progress in opening access to research. How should policies support the researcher and the research process? How can policies based on commercial profit fit into an open environment? What role do funders have in protecting their investment and the public interest?
Presented by Bill Hubbard
Bill Hubbard is the Director of the Centre for Research Communications (CRC) at the University of Nottingham, incorporating the work of SHERPA. The CRC has a portfolio of Open Access projects and services and is a recognised centre of expertise for OA development, policy, repositories and infrastructure.
Bill created the award-winning OA services RoMEO, JULIET and OpenDOAR, which are used around the world to unpick details of stakeholder policies, development policy and which underpin repository use. The CRC have also recently launched FACT, to support researchers in complying with specific RCUK and Wellcome Trust OA polices. Bill has also worked closely with OA publishers and advised on the transitions involved for commercial publishers from traditional to OA business models.
The benefits and challenges of open access: lessons from practice - Helen Bla...Jisc
Led by Helen Blanchett, subject specialist, scholarly communications, Jisc.
With contribution from Andrew Simpson, associate university librarian (procurement and metadata and systems), Portsmouth University.
In this session you’ll hear in this session you’ll hear about the benefits and challenges of open access.
Connect more in London, 28 June 2016
Nick Woolley, Director of Library Services - Sheffield Hallam University
In October 2022, as part of a strategic commitment to Open Research, Sheffield Hallam University’s new institutional policy for research publication and copyright, based on rights retention, came into effect.
As part of its role to provide access to knowledge, Hallam’s library led a partnership between the University’s research community and professional services to develop this new policy and implement rights retention as a new practice. This transformation in Hallam’s approach to copyright and scholarly communication took place alongside the development of UK HE sector requirements for transitional agreements and negotiation with publishers.
In this presentation, Nick Woolley (Director of Library and Campus Services) will share how the policy was developed and implemented and what the experience has been so far, including insight from the first six months of activity and data. Nick will show how Hallam’s policy is already making a positive impact on scholarly communication and argue why rights retention as disruptive innovation is relevant for all institutions who create knowledge.
Time is a thief of memory. Articles and books can be lost from the scholarly record unless publishers take active steps to ensure their long-term preservation.
Enabling smaller independent publishers to participate in Open Access agreeme...Alicia Wise
Webinar to introduce new tools available to support the automation of Open Access agreements between libraries/consortia and smaller independent publishers.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
1. | 1Open Access
The coming cost
of OA
compliance, and
how we can
reduce it
Alicia Wise
4 February 2016
2. | 2Open Access
Global approach to open access
Asia Pacific
• China: CAS & NSF; gold or green open
access, deposit within 12 months
• ARC & NHMRC in Australia have 12
month self-archive mandate, as does
A*Star in Singapore
• Other funders considering policy
Africa
• Developing repositories
• Publishers enabling philanthropic access
• New open access journals to support
local research needs
• Some institutions have open access
mandates, but no policies from any
funders or Governments
Europe
• Focused on a mix of gold & green open access
• UK funder mandates focused on gold (Research
Councils UK & Wellcome Trust)
• Green open access mandates in Italy & Spain
• All EU members formulating open access policies at
North America and Canada
• US Federal Agencies formulating policies following OSTP memo
e.g.
• NIH: gold or green; deposit to PMC within 12 months
• DOE: green (or gold); public access within 12 months via
PAGES and CHORUS
• NSF: gold or green; public access within 12 months
• CHORUS working with DOD, DOE, NSF, etc.
• Canada active in OA discussions and looking at gold and green
• Tri-Agency policy: gold or 12 month deposit mandate
• Gates Foundation: gold open access
Latin America
• Focus on green open access
• Argentina: MINCYT introduced 6
month deposit mandate
• Brazil: Government formulating
green open access policy
• Mexico: OA legislation passed to
support repository development
3. | 3Open Access
EU open access developments: mixed approach
National policy: Each member state to develop own approach and report annually.
Compliance rates depend on:
• Implementation of policy (consulting with stakeholders such as
institutions & publishers)
• Willingness to provide additional funds for APC’s and/or
consideration over length of embargo periods
• Tracking and enforcement of policy
• Researcher education and awareness
Green open access focus
Gold open access focus
Mixed open access focus
Immediate gold OA or green within 6 months (12
months for social sciences)
1st funder to begin enforcement by withholding
grant money due to non OA policy compliance
• Denied 63 grants in 2013
• Compliance is currently at 69%, up from
55% in 2012 (56% in Elsevier journals)
Examples:
4. | 4Open Access
4
Elsevier geographical breakdown of gold open access publishing
23% US & Canada
(+1% in 2014)
16% Rest of world
1% Unknown
16% Asia
(+6% in 2014)
49% Western Europe
(-3% in 2014)
5. | 5Open Access
450+
Open access journals
Elsevier and open access
• Actively engage
• Support both gold and green OA
• Test and learn
• Developing systems and technology to implement OA
• Working with funders, institutions and authors
• Offer choice
• Respect the academic freedom of authors
• Offer various ways for authors to comply with funder and
institutional policies
• Maintain focus on quality
Green open accessGold open access
• All journals offer authors an option to self
archive
• Share link service provides 50 days free
access to recently published research
• Pilot partner in the CHORUS initiative
• Open archives in 103 journals, including all
Cell Press titles after 12 months.
1625+
Hybrid journals
All journals
Offer green OA options
• Launching new open access journals and
all established journal offer an OA option
• Choice of either a commercial (CC BY) or
non-commercial (CC-BY-NC-ND) user
license.
• Article publishing charges (APCs) range
from $500- $5000 (US Dollars)
7. | 7Open Access
Scholarly collaboration networks (SCNs).
• Relatively new players in the scholarly
communication chain
• Lots to choose from!
• Enable researchers to share information, participate
in discussions and collaborate.
• Can facilitate sharing of either full text and/or links
What are they?
Some are already working with publishers!
8. | 8Open Access
Example– MyScienceWork
www.MyScienceWork.com, a Scientific Social Network is using our APIs to let their users
search, view, and even annotate and share ScienceDirect content on their website.
2. Green check mark
indicates the user is entitled
to view the full text
Using Article Entitlements
API
3. First page preview from
ScienceDirect API
(not counted as full-text
download),
using the Article Retrieval
API
1. Search results based
on indexed XML/
structured meta data
from the SD Search
API
3. User can read and
annotate ScienceDirect
embedded articles on
Mysciencework.com
Using the Article
Retrieval API
9. | 9Open Access
• STM Taskforce developed formed of both
publishers and SCNs.
• Resulted in issuing “Principles for article sharing
on Scholarly Collaboration Networks”.
• Key highlights
- “Sharing should be allowed within academic
groups”
- “Measure the amount and type of sharing using
standards such as COUNTER”
- “Publisher policies on academic group sharing and
public posting of journal articles should be clear and
easily discoverable”
Seamless sharing
• Fragmented metrics
• Preserving the scholarly
record
• Incorrect sharing
• No standard reporting
There are some issues…
Getting the basic rules of sharing right
11. | 11Open Access
• Author submits, names
funding source
• Publisher creates
metadata; sends via
CrossRef and open APIs
Identification
• Publisher makes full text
available to index
• Agency portals
• Common search engines
• CHORUS search
Discovery • Version of record for
subscribers and gold OA
articles
• Accepted manuscript
for guests after embargo
period
Access at
publisher
• CHORUS dashboard
provides reports and
services to funding
agencies
Compliance
• Preservation partners:
Portico, CLOCKSS
Preservation
How does CHORUS work?
12. | 12Open Access
• Coverage
• Metadata, abstracts, and full text for
indexing
• Over 30,000 articles by UF authors from
1949 forward
• Links to ScienceDirect for access
Collaborating through linking:
Elsevier APIs for Institutional Repositories
Elsevier provides APIs:
1. Content Identification API;
• Retrieve Metadata, abstracts and full text
• From Jan 2016 it will include article
embargo end dates
2. Entitlements API
• Direct users to best available version
3. Article retrieval API
• Display full text articles on local IR pages
via links
Why link?
• Cost effective
• Maximizing research impact for articles
• Delivering the best available
• Displaying the article in context
• Assuring the reliability and trustworthiness of content
•
Implemented on
SobekCM Platform