United Kingdom Scholarly Communications model policy and licence. A presentation which sets the context for the UK model university open access policy based on the Harvard model policy
Scholarly Communications Model Policy and Licence: Publishers' Association Co...Chris Banks
Responses from the UK-SCL Steering Group to a second letter from the Publishers' Association about a revision of the UK-SCL model policy which took into account concerns that publishers had raised with us. The first letter is here: https://www.slideshare.net/chrisabanks/scholarly-communications-model-policy-and-licence-publishers-association-concerns-together-with-ukscl-steering-group-responses
Scholarly Communications Model Policy and Licence: Publishers' Association Co...Chris Banks
Responses to recent concerns raised by the Publishers' Association about plans to introduce a model open access policy for UK Higher Education Institutions in order to simplify the complex funder and publisher policy environment currently experienced by UK academics.
Open Access in the UK - challenges of compliance with funder mandatesChris Banks
This was a presentation given at the LIBER2014 conference in Riga.
See http://liber2014.wp.lnb.lv/programme/papers/abstracts-and-biographies/#ChrisBanks for an abstract and biography.
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
Scholarly Communications Model Policy and Licence: Publishers' Association Co...Chris Banks
Responses from the UK-SCL Steering Group to a second letter from the Publishers' Association about a revision of the UK-SCL model policy which took into account concerns that publishers had raised with us. The first letter is here: https://www.slideshare.net/chrisabanks/scholarly-communications-model-policy-and-licence-publishers-association-concerns-together-with-ukscl-steering-group-responses
Scholarly Communications Model Policy and Licence: Publishers' Association Co...Chris Banks
Responses to recent concerns raised by the Publishers' Association about plans to introduce a model open access policy for UK Higher Education Institutions in order to simplify the complex funder and publisher policy environment currently experienced by UK academics.
Open Access in the UK - challenges of compliance with funder mandatesChris Banks
This was a presentation given at the LIBER2014 conference in Riga.
See http://liber2014.wp.lnb.lv/programme/papers/abstracts-and-biographies/#ChrisBanks for an abstract and biography.
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
In the ‘normal’ world of retail and commerce you pay for an item
and receive the item. The world of academic journals is different.
This presentation, based on KAUST’s experience to date, will
attempt to explain the different models of offset pricing while
outlining KAUST’s dual approach, redirecting subscription
money to publishing money and embedding open access terms
in understandable language in our license agreements, to the
problem. Stephen Buck and J K Vijayakumar
King Abdullah University of Saudi Arabia (KAUST)
Talk to Heads of University Biological Sciences Departments WInter Meeting 10 November 2011.
http://www.societyofbiology.org/newsandevents/events/view/327
OSFair2017 Training | Designing & implementing open access, open data & open ...Open Science Fair
Eloy Rodrigues, José Carvalho & Pedro Príncipe talk about designing & implementing Open Access, Open Data & Open Science policies.
Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond
Workshop overview:
This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks.
DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5
A research institution's view of their role in OA mandates and policies: Usin...enlightenrepository
Brief presentation on Insitutional and Funder Mandates as part of the Berlin 7 Session: Practical challenges in moving to Open Access: a focus on research funders and universities
NIH Public Access Policy - Neil Thakur (2007)faflrt
Dr. Neil Thakur, point person for the NIH Public Access policy shared the NIH perspective in the Open Access debate and their progress to date. Sponsored by ALA Federal and Armed Forces Libraries Roundtable (FAFLRT). Presented on June 25, 2007 at ALA Annual Conference in Washington, DC.
Presentation from our AGM and afternoon of talks on the theme of Open.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/mmit-2016-agm-and-free-talks-on-open-libraries-research-and-education-tickets-28552110130#
Stephen Pinfield - Professor of Information Services Management at University of Sheffield - @StephenPinfield
Overview of UKRI Open Access Policy 2022
Covers the Scope, requirements and funding for policy. Outlines the key actions for authors. Focus on Research Articles (April 2022) but also overview of requirements for long-form publications (Monographs, book chapters, edited collections) from January 2024.
Intended audience: Durham University staff and student authors of research articles.
Presentation embedded alongside further information at https://libguides.durham.ac.uk/open_research/policies/ukri
Version 1.1 2022.03.02
In the ‘normal’ world of retail and commerce you pay for an item
and receive the item. The world of academic journals is different.
This presentation, based on KAUST’s experience to date, will
attempt to explain the different models of offset pricing while
outlining KAUST’s dual approach, redirecting subscription
money to publishing money and embedding open access terms
in understandable language in our license agreements, to the
problem. Stephen Buck and J K Vijayakumar
King Abdullah University of Saudi Arabia (KAUST)
Talk to Heads of University Biological Sciences Departments WInter Meeting 10 November 2011.
http://www.societyofbiology.org/newsandevents/events/view/327
OSFair2017 Training | Designing & implementing open access, open data & open ...Open Science Fair
Eloy Rodrigues, José Carvalho & Pedro Príncipe talk about designing & implementing Open Access, Open Data & Open Science policies.
Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond
Workshop overview:
This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks.
DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5
A research institution's view of their role in OA mandates and policies: Usin...enlightenrepository
Brief presentation on Insitutional and Funder Mandates as part of the Berlin 7 Session: Practical challenges in moving to Open Access: a focus on research funders and universities
NIH Public Access Policy - Neil Thakur (2007)faflrt
Dr. Neil Thakur, point person for the NIH Public Access policy shared the NIH perspective in the Open Access debate and their progress to date. Sponsored by ALA Federal and Armed Forces Libraries Roundtable (FAFLRT). Presented on June 25, 2007 at ALA Annual Conference in Washington, DC.
Presentation from our AGM and afternoon of talks on the theme of Open.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/mmit-2016-agm-and-free-talks-on-open-libraries-research-and-education-tickets-28552110130#
Stephen Pinfield - Professor of Information Services Management at University of Sheffield - @StephenPinfield
Overview of UKRI Open Access Policy 2022
Covers the Scope, requirements and funding for policy. Outlines the key actions for authors. Focus on Research Articles (April 2022) but also overview of requirements for long-form publications (Monographs, book chapters, edited collections) from January 2024.
Intended audience: Durham University staff and student authors of research articles.
Presentation embedded alongside further information at https://libguides.durham.ac.uk/open_research/policies/ukri
Version 1.1 2022.03.02
Social sciences directory liber conference (26.06.2013)SocSciDir
A presentation given by Dan Scott, the founder of 'gold' Open Access publisher Social Sciences Directory Limited, as part of the workshop "Innovative Open Access Publishing Initiatives - and how Libraries/Library Consortia could support such initiatives" at the LIBER conference in Munich, 26th June 2013
Whose Property Is It Anyway? Part 2: The Challenges in Supporting the UK’s Ma...LIBER Europe
Whose Property Is It Anyway? Part 2: The Challenges in Supporting the UK’s Main Research Funder Agendas which Seek to Ensure that the Outputs from Publicly-Funded Research are Published Open Access
Chris Banks, Imperial College London, UK. This presentation was one of the 10 most highly ranked at LIBER's Annual Conference 2014 in Riga, Latvia. Learn more: www.libereurope.eu
Presentation at the American Association of Publishers Professional and Scholarly Publishing Division conference in February 2016 on the coming cost of open access compliance, and how we can reduce it
Encouraging Openness and how stakeholder policies can support or block it!"CIARD Movement
Funders, authors and readers may want open access to research, but can they achieve it? A researcher who has been encouraged to make their work open has to deal with regulations, guidance, and mandates from their institution, their funders, their publisher and their national government. These policies are often complex and can be ambiguous, or in conflict with each other.
A supportive policy environment and guidance through the relationship of one policy to another has proved to be essential for real progress in opening access to research. How should policies support the researcher and the research process? How can policies based on commercial profit fit into an open environment? What role do funders have in protecting their investment and the public interest?
Presented by Bill Hubbard
Bill Hubbard is the Director of the Centre for Research Communications (CRC) at the University of Nottingham, incorporating the work of SHERPA. The CRC has a portfolio of Open Access projects and services and is a recognised centre of expertise for OA development, policy, repositories and infrastructure.
Bill created the award-winning OA services RoMEO, JULIET and OpenDOAR, which are used around the world to unpick details of stakeholder policies, development policy and which underpin repository use. The CRC have also recently launched FACT, to support researchers in complying with specific RCUK and Wellcome Trust OA polices. Bill has also worked closely with OA publishers and advised on the transitions involved for commercial publishers from traditional to OA business models.
A presentation made by Judith Barnsby, DOAJ Publication Specialist, to the Library Publishing Coalition on 19th October 2016. Judith discusses why DOAJ is important to open access and which criteria DOAJ requires to be accepted into it.
Nick Woolley, Director of Library Services - Sheffield Hallam University
In October 2022, as part of a strategic commitment to Open Research, Sheffield Hallam University’s new institutional policy for research publication and copyright, based on rights retention, came into effect.
As part of its role to provide access to knowledge, Hallam’s library led a partnership between the University’s research community and professional services to develop this new policy and implement rights retention as a new practice. This transformation in Hallam’s approach to copyright and scholarly communication took place alongside the development of UK HE sector requirements for transitional agreements and negotiation with publishers.
In this presentation, Nick Woolley (Director of Library and Campus Services) will share how the policy was developed and implemented and what the experience has been so far, including insight from the first six months of activity and data. Nick will show how Hallam’s policy is already making a positive impact on scholarly communication and argue why rights retention as disruptive innovation is relevant for all institutions who create knowledge.
How do we find our way through the forest of requirements, options, exemptions, variations and special cases that institutions and individuals have to handle with Open Access policies? The Open Access policy environment is growing more complex and more demanding in its needs, and now more significant in its implications.
Open access presentation at Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscienceopenaccesskcl
Open Access presentation delivered on the 8th October 2014 at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience.
Presenters are Lynne Meehan (Research Support Manager) and Helen Cargill (Digital Assets Manager)
Making Open Access Work for Ireland: Geraldine Clement Stoneham - MRCThe Royal Irish Academy
The Royal Irish Academy and the Irish Research Council held a forum on Open Access in May 2013.
More Details - http://www.ria.ie/about/our-work/policy/ria-initiatives/making-open-access-work-for-ireland.aspx
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
United Kingdom Scholarly Communications model policy and Licence - UK-SCL - update 2017 10 22
1. United Kingdom Scholarly Communications
model policy and licence
October 2017
Prepared by Chris Banks on behalf of the UK-SCL Steering Group
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a
copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative
Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.
2. Overview
• Funder Open Access Policy environment
– Consequences of multiple funder policies – the policy
stack
– Minimum compliance/eligibility criteria
– Funder encouragement to go beyond the minimum
• Need for university open access policies to align with
funder policies and to support researchers
– Steps being taken in Universities
– Steps being taken nationally to align university OA
policies
• Publisher responses
3. RCUK
• Preference for gold but
accepts green
• Some institutions are funded
for gold
• Minimum compliance: CC-BY-
NC for green
• Varying maximum embargo
periods for the first five years
depending on whether
institution has funds for gold
Funder policy differences
REF2021 OA policy
• Author Accepted Manuscript
must be placed in a repository
(aiming for within 3 months of
Acceptance but for first two
years of policy – within 3 months
of publication)
• Agnostic about Green / Gold
• No funding
• Minimum compliance: CC-BY-
NC-ND with 12/24 month
embargoes
3
4. And that is just two funders
• Many funder policies:
• Different compliance requirements
• Differently funded (or not)
• Many publisher policies
• Some publisher have different policies
depending on who funds the
researcher
• HEFCE policy in particular, differs
substantially from other policies and applies
to all UK academics
• Many publisher policies are not in line with
HEFCE policy
• Difficult to know what to do to comply with
Funder policies and for outputs to be
REF2021 eligible
7. Meanwhile, UK researchers
face the “policy stack”
challenge
• Many funder policies:
• Different compliance requirements
• Differently funded (or not)
• REF policy in particular, differs substantially from other
policies and applies to all UK research academics
• Many publisher policies
• Some publisher have different policies depending on
who funds the researcher
• Many publisher policies are not in line with REF policy
• Difficult to know what to do to comply both with Funder and
REF policies (e.g. very easy to comply with RCUK but fall foul
of REF2021 eligibility)
• Institutional OA and IP policies not in alignment with funder
policies, so don’t best support academics.
10. Institutional open access policies need to work in
harmony with funder policies and so many have been
in need of revision
11. Publishers
• Have varying approaches to copyright, from licence to
first publish, to outright copyright transfer. Academics are
rarely given a choice
• Licenses are generally not read by academics –
researchers are more interest in the journal than in the
agreement
• This is a problem not confined to publishing – how many
have read the android google agreement? Social media
agreements?
• In 2012 Time magazine reported Carnegie Mellon funded
research which concluded: You’d Need 76 Work Days to
Read All Your Privacy Policies Each Year
12. Library
• Wanting to create frictionless services
• Needing to upscale services to all researchers –
REF2021 OA policy
• Can’t easily give answer to researchers on OA
options - need to ask them lots of questions first
(who funds, where publishing) before advising of OA
options/requirements
• Working with researchers to understand challenges
and opportunities
15. Harvard model policy
chosen
Key components:
• Implemented as part of university OA policy
• Academics deposit Author Accepted Manuscripts (AAMs)
and grant a non-exclusive licence to the university for all
journal articles
• Well established policy – has been in use since 2008
• Where a journal seeks a waiver, this can be managed by
exception (happens <5% in the USA)
• Used by over 60 institutions worldwide
• From Harvard and MIT
• To smaller institutions, including two in Kenya
18. Key components of the
new model policy
• Retain the right to make accepted manuscripts of scholarly articles
authored by its staff available publicly under the CC BY NC (4.0)
licence from the moment of first publication (or earlier if the
publisher’s policy allows).
• Allow authors and publishers to request a temporary waiver for
applying this right for up to 12 months for AHSS and 6 months for
STEM (aligned to REF panels).
• Where a paper is co-authored with external co-authors, the
institution will:
– Automatically sub-licence this right all co-authors credited on
the paper and their host institutions.
– Not apply the licence if a co-author (who is not based at an
institution with a UK-SCL-based model policy) objects.
– Honour waiver requests granted by other institutions which
have adopted the UK-SCL model policy.
19. Next steps by the
community
• 60 institutions overall interested
• First mover group ~ 12 institutions
• Ongoing discussions with publishers
• Wider engagement with the researcher, library,
research office and legal office communities
• Website and advocacy materials: ukscl.ac.uk
• Boilerplate texts for authors, collaboration
agreements etc., being drafted
• Steering Committee established
• Responding to publisher concerns and perceptions
20. Publisher responses
• Some very positive responses from some publishers,
including pure gold (e.g. PLoS) but also learned
society (Royal Society). Other publishers are in
discussion with Steering Group members with a view
to aligning their policies with the UK-SCL
• Other publishers less happy but now in dialogue with
the Steering Group through membership bodes:
Publishers’ Association and the Association of
Learned and Professional Society Publishers
21. Researcher concerns
• The need to seek agreement from co-authors (particularly for those
collaborations commenced before policy adoption)
– Can be addressed through a phased/gradual implementation and
supported by the library
• Fear that a publisher will refuse to publish
– Institutions using the Harvard model report no instances of this
happening
• Learned Societies – fear loss of income
– Publishers add value and readers prefer continue to prefer the Version
of Record rather than the Author Acceptance Manuscript. No reliable
research evidence to back up Learned Society fears.
• Don’t like the CC-BY-NC licence
– This was chosen so that it complied with RCUK where a ND licence is
not compliant
22. Further reading &
watching
• Banks, C., (2016). Focusing upstream: supporting scholarly
communication by academics. Insights. 29(1), pp.37–44.
DOI: http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.292
• Torsten Reimer, UK Scholarly Communications, Licence and Model
Policy, https://zenodo.org/record/153928#.WLaz9G-LREY
• “Focusing upstream” – recording of talk given at UKSG 11 April
2017: https://tv.theiet.org/?videoid=10043
• “Copyright and Licensing session : Rights as the foundation of
scholarly communication” – outputs (ppt and recording) from talk
given at the OAI10 – CERN – UNIGE Workshop on Innovations in
Scholarly Communication
https://indico.cern.ch/event/405949/contributions/2487876/
• Responses to concerns raised by the Publishers’ Association:
http://bit.ly/2yAmyRm and http://bit.ly/2yFUkDW
23. Credits
• All those who originally developed the “Harvard” model
• Dr Torsten Reimer (formerly Imperial, now British Library)
• Simon Bains (Manchester)
• RCUK
• HEFCE
• Wellcome
• RLUK for funding much of the legal costs
• Many RLUK and LERU librarians