The document discusses progress towards open access to research publications and data. It defines open access as free online availability permitting reuse without financial or legal barriers. Since 2002, strategies of self-archiving in repositories and publishing in open access journals have increased open access publications to around 20-23% globally. While government policies aim to increase open access, they are unclear and risk being expensive. Local actions by universities and researchers can better promote open access through monitoring policies, supporting authors, and engaging departments. Open access to research data also presents opportunities and challenges regarding standards, ownership and infrastructure.
How to get your institution ready for open access monographs - Ellen Collins ...Jisc
How ready is your institution for Open Access (OA) monographs? Although excluded from REF2020, there is no doubt that they will be included in the future, indeed you can already publish an OA monograph now. This session will first provide a brief introduction to the OA monograph landscape – what is happening, who is doing what, what models are being explored. It will then look at how institutions are responding to landscape and based on evidence collected through institutional case studies as part of the OAPEN-UK project, present tips for getting your institution ready for OA monographs.
The OAPEN-UK project, funded by AHRC and Jisc is exploring open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences. The institutional case studies included in-depth interviews with Pro-Vice Chancellors of Research, Directors of Research, Grant administrators, Finance Directors, Librarians and Repository Staff and researchers themselves. The session will be presented by Ellen Collins, Research Officer for OAPEN-UK.
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
NIH Public Access Policy - Neil Thakur (2007)faflrt
Dr. Neil Thakur, point person for the NIH Public Access policy shared the NIH perspective in the Open Access debate and their progress to date. Sponsored by ALA Federal and Armed Forces Libraries Roundtable (FAFLRT). Presented on June 25, 2007 at ALA Annual Conference in Washington, DC.
Presented at the Regional Workshop “Benefits of Open Access for Research Dissemination, Usage, Visibility and Impact” – 22 to 23 November 2010,
Pretoria (South Africa).
Gorman ODNI Academic Excellence Biosecurity Commons August 2, 2010bgorman
6th Annual ODNI Intelligence Community Centers of Academic Excellence Summer Seminar
August 2, 2010 Gaylord National Harbor Hotel and Conference Center, National Harbor, MD
How to get your institution ready for open access monographs - Ellen Collins ...Jisc
How ready is your institution for Open Access (OA) monographs? Although excluded from REF2020, there is no doubt that they will be included in the future, indeed you can already publish an OA monograph now. This session will first provide a brief introduction to the OA monograph landscape – what is happening, who is doing what, what models are being explored. It will then look at how institutions are responding to landscape and based on evidence collected through institutional case studies as part of the OAPEN-UK project, present tips for getting your institution ready for OA monographs.
The OAPEN-UK project, funded by AHRC and Jisc is exploring open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences. The institutional case studies included in-depth interviews with Pro-Vice Chancellors of Research, Directors of Research, Grant administrators, Finance Directors, Librarians and Repository Staff and researchers themselves. The session will be presented by Ellen Collins, Research Officer for OAPEN-UK.
Open access for the inaugural @OpenResLDN meeting 2015 01 19Chris Banks
Slides that I will speak to at the inaugural meeting of OpenResLDN on 19th January 2015. January 2015 sees the 350th anniversary of the first ever journal publication - the Journal des Savants. We are now in the 21st year of the Open Access movement and the UK and European policies are really beginning to drive change and innovation. That change is not fast enough for some, and for others - particularly those covered by the policies, or seeking to implement policy - just a little too fast sometimes.
NIH Public Access Policy - Neil Thakur (2007)faflrt
Dr. Neil Thakur, point person for the NIH Public Access policy shared the NIH perspective in the Open Access debate and their progress to date. Sponsored by ALA Federal and Armed Forces Libraries Roundtable (FAFLRT). Presented on June 25, 2007 at ALA Annual Conference in Washington, DC.
Presented at the Regional Workshop “Benefits of Open Access for Research Dissemination, Usage, Visibility and Impact” – 22 to 23 November 2010,
Pretoria (South Africa).
Gorman ODNI Academic Excellence Biosecurity Commons August 2, 2010bgorman
6th Annual ODNI Intelligence Community Centers of Academic Excellence Summer Seminar
August 2, 2010 Gaylord National Harbor Hotel and Conference Center, National Harbor, MD
It appears highly probable that immediate open access publishing
will become the default mode for scholarly publishing – for the
biosciences first, other sectors later. ‘Immediate’ open access
means unfettered publication as soon as a scholarly work is
ready, with no embargo period. The costs of making a scholarly
artefact available can be reduced without sacrificing quality. This
interactive session will sketch the argument for these claims and
will present several value-added services that publishers could
develop to thrive in an open access world.
Open Access and Publishers - Michael Mabe (2007)faflrt
Michael Mabe, formerly VP at Elsevier and currently CEO of the International Association of STM Publishers (with membership representing nearly all major society and commercial publishers); presented the commercial and society publisher perspective on the Open Access debate including the Brussels Declaration opposed to many of the tenants of Open Access. Sponsored by ALA Federal and Armed Forces Libraries Roundtable (FAFLRT). Presented on June 25, 2007 at ALA Annual Conference in Washington, DC.
The Growing Call for Open Access - Heather Joseph (2007)faflrt
Heather Joseph, formerly of BioOne and currently the Executive Director of SPARC (Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition) discussed her group’s advocacy efforts related to Open Access and the Federal Research Public Access Act of 2006. Sponsored by ALA Federal and Armed Forces Libraries Roundtable (FAFLRT). Presented on June 25, 2007 at ALA Annual Conference in Washington, DC.
Incentives for sharing research data – Veerle Van den Eynden, UK Data Service
Incentives to innovate – Joe Marshall, NCUB
Incentives in university collaboration - Tim Lance, NYSERNET
Giving researchers credit for their data – Neil Jefferies, The Bodleian Digital Library Systems and Services (BDLSS)
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
AgNIC 18th Annual Meeting (May 15, 2013)
Presenter: Jose de Buerba, Sr. Publishing Officer,
The World Bank
Links: http://wrld.bg/wvwOK
http://openknowledge.worldbank.org
In the ‘normal’ world of retail and commerce you pay for an item
and receive the item. The world of academic journals is different.
This presentation, based on KAUST’s experience to date, will
attempt to explain the different models of offset pricing while
outlining KAUST’s dual approach, redirecting subscription
money to publishing money and embedding open access terms
in understandable language in our license agreements, to the
problem. Stephen Buck and J K Vijayakumar
King Abdullah University of Saudi Arabia (KAUST)
Libraries are increasingly being called upon to extend
access to their online resources to users beyond their
core constituencies. Every institution has its own unique
arrangements, but they all raise similar questions for the
library: are these users included under our existing licences
or are separate ones needed? Will we have to pay more, and
if so, how much? Where can I go for advice? Learn about the
guidelines Jisc Collections has developed, and hear from
two librarians who have successfully implemented their own
solutions: Anna Franca on KCL’s work with an NHS Trust
and Ruth Dale on Nottingham’s overseas campuses.
The greatest possible impact: The Wellcome Trust and open researchUoLResearchSupport
Research funders are increasingly recognising the importance of open research practices, to increase the reach and impact of their funded research and to ensure the integrity of research results.
The Wellcome Trust have been leading efforts to make research more open for more than 20 years, ever since working to make sure the results of the Human Genome Project were released immediately into the public domain. They were also the first research funder to introduce a mandatory open access policy, with more than 150 global research funders having since followed their lead. More recently, they have developed the Wellcome Open Research platform, which allow their researchers to rapidly publish and share their findings openly and transparently, and encourage researchers to cite preprints in their grant applications.
On Thursday 17th June we welcome Sonya Towers, Grants Adviser - Immunobiology and Infectious Disease at the Wellcome Trust, to discuss Wellcome’s approach to open research including their Output Management Plan pilot on which they are liaising with the University of Leeds.
At a time of rapid change in scholarly communications, it
can be challenging for publishers and libraries in the not-forprofit
sector to keep up with our customers’ needs and with
our competitors’ offerings. This session will explore what two
university presses and a library are doing to support their
researchers and authors and how they make those decisions
when money is tight. Is it best to build, buy or partner? How
can innovation be balanced with fulfilling more traditional
customer expectations and managing legacy products or
services? To what extent can and should libraries and not-forprofit publishers accommodate the plethora of new scholarly
and educational tools and services?
Providing open access to digitised special and archival
collections to enable innovative research, teaching and
learning presents a big challenge for institutions due to
the cost and resources needed. This session discusses a
collaboration between Jisc and US Reveal Digital based on
their ‘library crowdfunding’ cost recovery-open access model
for digitisation of special collections and how this enabled
the building of a small fund for UK digitisation. It will invite
feedback from the audience on such community-based
initiatives to inform Jisc’s future planning. Paola Marchionni
Jisc
Open Access Progress and Promise in the CGIAR ConsortiumCIARD Movement
The presentation provided an overview and update on the CGIAR Consortium's progress in Open Access, including some of the challenges and opportunities of advocating for Open Access across the Consortium.
The webinar was presented by Piers Bocock, Director of Knowledge Management and Communication at the CGIAR Consortium. He is responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of the Consortium’s Knowledge Management, Communications, and IT strategies, leveraging best practices in these disciplines to help the Consortium deliver on its mandate.
It appears highly probable that immediate open access publishing
will become the default mode for scholarly publishing – for the
biosciences first, other sectors later. ‘Immediate’ open access
means unfettered publication as soon as a scholarly work is
ready, with no embargo period. The costs of making a scholarly
artefact available can be reduced without sacrificing quality. This
interactive session will sketch the argument for these claims and
will present several value-added services that publishers could
develop to thrive in an open access world.
Open Access and Publishers - Michael Mabe (2007)faflrt
Michael Mabe, formerly VP at Elsevier and currently CEO of the International Association of STM Publishers (with membership representing nearly all major society and commercial publishers); presented the commercial and society publisher perspective on the Open Access debate including the Brussels Declaration opposed to many of the tenants of Open Access. Sponsored by ALA Federal and Armed Forces Libraries Roundtable (FAFLRT). Presented on June 25, 2007 at ALA Annual Conference in Washington, DC.
The Growing Call for Open Access - Heather Joseph (2007)faflrt
Heather Joseph, formerly of BioOne and currently the Executive Director of SPARC (Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition) discussed her group’s advocacy efforts related to Open Access and the Federal Research Public Access Act of 2006. Sponsored by ALA Federal and Armed Forces Libraries Roundtable (FAFLRT). Presented on June 25, 2007 at ALA Annual Conference in Washington, DC.
Incentives for sharing research data – Veerle Van den Eynden, UK Data Service
Incentives to innovate – Joe Marshall, NCUB
Incentives in university collaboration - Tim Lance, NYSERNET
Giving researchers credit for their data – Neil Jefferies, The Bodleian Digital Library Systems and Services (BDLSS)
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
AgNIC 18th Annual Meeting (May 15, 2013)
Presenter: Jose de Buerba, Sr. Publishing Officer,
The World Bank
Links: http://wrld.bg/wvwOK
http://openknowledge.worldbank.org
In the ‘normal’ world of retail and commerce you pay for an item
and receive the item. The world of academic journals is different.
This presentation, based on KAUST’s experience to date, will
attempt to explain the different models of offset pricing while
outlining KAUST’s dual approach, redirecting subscription
money to publishing money and embedding open access terms
in understandable language in our license agreements, to the
problem. Stephen Buck and J K Vijayakumar
King Abdullah University of Saudi Arabia (KAUST)
Libraries are increasingly being called upon to extend
access to their online resources to users beyond their
core constituencies. Every institution has its own unique
arrangements, but they all raise similar questions for the
library: are these users included under our existing licences
or are separate ones needed? Will we have to pay more, and
if so, how much? Where can I go for advice? Learn about the
guidelines Jisc Collections has developed, and hear from
two librarians who have successfully implemented their own
solutions: Anna Franca on KCL’s work with an NHS Trust
and Ruth Dale on Nottingham’s overseas campuses.
The greatest possible impact: The Wellcome Trust and open researchUoLResearchSupport
Research funders are increasingly recognising the importance of open research practices, to increase the reach and impact of their funded research and to ensure the integrity of research results.
The Wellcome Trust have been leading efforts to make research more open for more than 20 years, ever since working to make sure the results of the Human Genome Project were released immediately into the public domain. They were also the first research funder to introduce a mandatory open access policy, with more than 150 global research funders having since followed their lead. More recently, they have developed the Wellcome Open Research platform, which allow their researchers to rapidly publish and share their findings openly and transparently, and encourage researchers to cite preprints in their grant applications.
On Thursday 17th June we welcome Sonya Towers, Grants Adviser - Immunobiology and Infectious Disease at the Wellcome Trust, to discuss Wellcome’s approach to open research including their Output Management Plan pilot on which they are liaising with the University of Leeds.
At a time of rapid change in scholarly communications, it
can be challenging for publishers and libraries in the not-forprofit
sector to keep up with our customers’ needs and with
our competitors’ offerings. This session will explore what two
university presses and a library are doing to support their
researchers and authors and how they make those decisions
when money is tight. Is it best to build, buy or partner? How
can innovation be balanced with fulfilling more traditional
customer expectations and managing legacy products or
services? To what extent can and should libraries and not-forprofit publishers accommodate the plethora of new scholarly
and educational tools and services?
Providing open access to digitised special and archival
collections to enable innovative research, teaching and
learning presents a big challenge for institutions due to
the cost and resources needed. This session discusses a
collaboration between Jisc and US Reveal Digital based on
their ‘library crowdfunding’ cost recovery-open access model
for digitisation of special collections and how this enabled
the building of a small fund for UK digitisation. It will invite
feedback from the audience on such community-based
initiatives to inform Jisc’s future planning. Paola Marchionni
Jisc
Open Access Progress and Promise in the CGIAR ConsortiumCIARD Movement
The presentation provided an overview and update on the CGIAR Consortium's progress in Open Access, including some of the challenges and opportunities of advocating for Open Access across the Consortium.
The webinar was presented by Piers Bocock, Director of Knowledge Management and Communication at the CGIAR Consortium. He is responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of the Consortium’s Knowledge Management, Communications, and IT strategies, leveraging best practices in these disciplines to help the Consortium deliver on its mandate.
OpenAccess policies as tools for innovative research and educational challenges.Università di Padova
Intervention to the International Conference
The future of political science: an international and interdisciplinary conversation, Università degli Studi di Padova, 14-15 december 2012.
The presentation discusses the current largely commercial-based publishing system and contextualizes it within the research assessment system. It presents institution-based non-for -profit publishing initiaves and the European Commissions policies and supports in the direction of empowering this type of scholarly communication.
OpenAIRE webinar: Horizon 2020 Open Science Policies and beyond, with Emilie ...OpenAIRE
The global shift towards making research findings available free of charge and sharing and opening up the research process, so-called 'Open Science’, has been a core strategy in the European Commission to improve knowledge circulation and innovation.
It is illustrated in particular by the Open Science policies for the ECs framework programme.
In this webinar, I will talk about the OS policies for open access to scientific publications and the pilot for research data in Horizon 2020, followed by a preview of what to expect for Open Science in the new Horizon Europe programme.
---
The 2019 International Open Access Week will be held October 21-27, 2019. This year’s theme, “Open for Whom? Equity in Open Knowledge,” builds on the groundwork laid during last year’s focus of “Designing Equitable Foundations for Open Knowledge.”
As has become a tradition of sorts, OpenAIRE organises a series of webinars during this week, highlighting OpenAIRE activities, services and tools, and reach out to the wider community with relevant talks on many aspects of Open Science.
The European Commission's proposal for embedding open science in horizon europe. Particular emphasis on open access and research data management aspects. Also presenting the new publishing platform of the Commission, Open Research Europe
Presentation at the Joint Executive Board Meeting of the European Federation of Psychology Students’ Associations (EFPSA), October 28, 2014,Dobra Voda, Serbia
Open Research comprises open access to the broad range of research outputs, from journal articles and the underlying data to protocols, results (including negative results), software and tools. Open Research increases inclusivity and collaboration, improves transparency and reproducibility of research and underpins research integrity.
This workshop focuses on the benefits of practicing open research for you as a researcher, to improve discoverability and maximise access to your work and to raise your professional profile.
By the end of the session you will:
• Have an understanding of the principles of Open Research
• Understand open licences and how they apply to publications, data and software
• Be able to apply key tools and techniques to increase the visibility of yourself and your research, including repositories, ORCID, social media and altmetrics
• Describe the different ways of making research and data available open access
What do you want in research journal publishing a revolution or an evolution ...Pubrica
In the life of an academic, journal publishing is critical. It hurts if someone else publishes comparable work earlier or in a “high impact publication” with a larger readership.
Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3gjNn0q
For our services: https://pubrica.com/services/publication-support/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Bio statistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353
Policies that underpin scholarly publishing - The implications of NRF’s Open ...
Frederick Friend: Where we are now in opening research results and data
1. Where we are now in opening research
results and data
Frederick Friend
Honorary Director Scholarly Communication UCL
http://www.friendofopenaccess.org.uk
f.friend@ucl.ac.uk
2. Clear definition of open access important in judging
progress towards 100% OA
Open access was first defined in the Budapest Open Access Initiative of
2002: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read
“The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give
to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category
encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any
unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert
colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of
wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we
mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to
read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these
articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for
any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint
on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this
domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and
the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.”
N.B. outputs from publicly-funded research, not commercial research
3. Strategies to achieve open access
The Budapest Initiative outlined two complementary strategies to
achieve open access, i.e. not competing strategies but both
necessary to achieve 100% access to and re-use of publicly-funded
research outputs
The two strategies are self-archiving by authors into repositories and
publication in open access journals
Since 2002 both strategies have been pursued by
institutions, funders and authors across the world, without a single
journal ceasing publication because of repository deposit and
without a single repository closing because of publication in journals
Changes have taken place (repositories have developed new
services and OA journals have developed various business models)
but without disturbing the basic relationship between the two
strategies which has benefited communities across the world
4. Progress in understanding the benefits from open access
Visibility on internet of taxpayer-funded research outputs, important
for funders, future researchers, authors and potential general public
users
Readership increased as a result of high visibility, providing
feedback to authors, stimulating further research, and correcting
errors
Impact resulting from higher readership, raising the research profile
of institutions and individual researchers (N.B. UK research
assessment procedures give equal value to articles published on
open access and to subscription articles)
Economic value to countries and regions as open access research
outputs are used by SMEs and other growth-producing
companies, at a cost to the taxpayer less than that for publication in
subscription-based journals (N.B. see the research undertaken by
Professor John Houghton of Victoria University Melbourne)
5. World-wide progress in introducing open access
Surveys show proportion of peer-reviewed research articles published
on open access in 2008 as 20% (11.5% available in various
repositories, 8.5% available on publisher web-sites: (Björk, B.C. et
al.), rising to 23% in 2010 (21.9% in repositories, 1.2% in journals:
Gargouri, Y et al.)
This is a remarkable achievement only eight years after launch of open
access movement in 2002, in the face of powerful lobbying by
commercial interests against open access
Cultural change in academic community happening gradually
Many research funding agencies and universities world-wide now
committed to open access
Biggest volumes from US and Europe but China, India and developing
world also significant
2212 open access repositories (source: OpenDOAR) and 149 purely
open access journals (source: DOAJ)
Large number of OA repositories allows easy local deposit
Within Europe the EC is leading the way, with pilot open access services
(OpenAIRE for repository deposit and publication charge payment for
open access journals)
6. “Better access to British scientific research and academic papers
by 2014”: how much access and at what cost?
After rejecting open access in 2004, the UK Government has now
realised the benefits from open access: excellent
However, the UK Government’s proposals for achieving more open
access than achieved hitherto are unclear, flawed and expensive
For current research outputs the Government is only supporting the
open access journal route to open access, not open access
repositories, missing out on a big section of open access content
Repositories are allocated roles in preservation and data without the
provision of any funding for those expensive roles
If data access is allocated to repositories and research articles to
journals, how will easy cross-access between data and articles work?
Universities given a block of money to pay publishers for open access
but no cap on individual payments to publishers, so no certainty about
how many articles can be made OA
Money for OA is not extra money but is taken from research budget
Authors still divorced from cost of publishing so competition between
publishers reducing cost to taxpayer of OA cannot kick in
No sign that other countries are following UK Government policy
7. Maintaining progress and growing OA in the UK: local
actions (1)
Government and RC decisions are clearly important but university
institutions and individuals can play a big part in improving access to
and re-use of research articles
Many universities now have OA policies, some with mandates, but
more needs to be done to monitor and improve observance of
policies
This involves metrics and also publicity for success stories, e.g.
author with highest number of hits by users, anecdotes of effect
upon student learning of sharing of OA content etc. (see Knowledge
Exchange OA success stories web-site http://www.knowledge-
exchange.info/Default.aspx?ID=492)
Ensure that deposit happens at publication even if OA release is
delayed by embargo
Encourage authors to use CC-BY or licence to publish
8. Maintaining progress and growing OA in the UK: local
actions (2)
Library or repository staff can provide support for authors to make
deposit easy
In order to improve user experience of repository content consider
introducing a quality kite-mark or a citeable reference like a DOI
Researchers: please talk about OA in your department, as many of
your colleagues may still not know what OA is, what the benefits are
to research, and what individual researchers can do
Authors: please think about how much you are paying a publisher to
publish your work and the quality of service you are receiving in
return for the payment
Heads of Department: please remember that the Funding Councils
give equal value to repository and journal content in assessment
procedures
9. Research data: a massive future growth area – and it will
be open access
What happens to data collected as part of the research process is a big
issue: huge volume of data and huge potential use of the data
Who owns the data? Differing viewpoints
Whose responsibility is it to collect, preserve and refresh the data? No
clear answer but finding the answer quickly is important.
Who sets the standards and who ensures that they are followed?
International infrastructure needed to ensure ease of collection and use
of data
These issues are bring addressed partly by collaboration between
bodies like the EC and NSF, and partly by collaboration at the grass-
roots level
New “Research Data Alignment” group discussing issues like data IPR
Some top-down decision-making essential but guided by researchers
Whatever the infrastructure all involved are agreed on the importance of
open access to publicly-funded research data.
10. European Commission “Recommendation on access to
and preservation of scientific information” July 2012
Open access to research data
Define clear policies for the dissemination of and open access to research data resulting from publicly
funded research. These policies should provide for:
– concrete objectives and indicators to measure progress;
– implementation plans, including the allocation of responsibilities (including appropriate licensing);
– associated financial planning.
Ensure that, as a result of these policies:
– research data that result from publicly funded research become publicly accessible, usable and re-usable
through digital e-infrastructures. Concerns in particular in relation to privacy, trade secrets, national
security, legitimate commercial interests and to intellectual property rights shall be duly taken into
account. Any data, know-how and/or information whatever their form or nature which are held by private
parties in a joint public/private partnership prior to the research action and have been identified as such
shall not fall under such an obligation;
– datasets are made easily identifiable and can be linked to other datasets and publications through
appropriate mechanisms, and additional information is provided to enable their proper evaluation and use;
– institutions responsible for managing public research funding and academic institutions that are publicly
funded assist in implementing national policy by putting in place mechanisms enabling and rewarding the
sharing of research data;
– advanced-degree programmes of new professional profiles in the area of datahandling technologies are
promoted and/or implemented.
11. Thank you for listening – here are some sources for
further information
Bjork B-C et al. “Open access to the scientific journal literature” PLoS
ONE 5(6): e11273. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
Gargouri, Y et al. “Green and gold open access percentages and
growth” http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3664
EC policies on open access to research publications and data
http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/open_access/
EC FP7 E-infrastructure projects http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/e-
infrastructure/projects_en.html , listing both publication projects like
OpenAIRE and also collaborative data projects like EUDAT
Friend F, Guedon J-C, Van de Sompel, H “Beyond sharing and re-
use: towards global data networking” unpublished paper for EC
http://www.friendofopenaccess.org.uk/index.php/data-infrastructure