This document summarizes inconsistencies in Conceptual Metaphor Theory as proposed by researchers like Kövecses. It notes that structural metaphors do not properly delineate concepts like love and life, but make them seem synonymous. It also argues that mappings are limited and do not apply universally. Alternative theories of emotion proposed by Wierzbicka are discussed. The document concludes that CMT reflects the conceptualization of experts rather than actual language usage, making it an isolating rather than empirically-based model. Examples of misclassified metaphors and inconsistent source domains are provided to support this.
This presentation deals with the closure concept and how it takes place in narratives. It is based on The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative by H.Porter Abbott.
uploaded may,25,2015
Ziya Amiri Sadr
An emergency 'first aid' slideshow used in an attempt to steer my current A level class back towards the Assessment Objectives for their imminent coursework essay in Literature this year! It's specific to the texts we are studying (Atwood / Ishiguro) but bits may still be useful to other groups!
This presentation deals with the closure concept and how it takes place in narratives. It is based on The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative by H.Porter Abbott.
uploaded may,25,2015
Ziya Amiri Sadr
An emergency 'first aid' slideshow used in an attempt to steer my current A level class back towards the Assessment Objectives for their imminent coursework essay in Literature this year! It's specific to the texts we are studying (Atwood / Ishiguro) but bits may still be useful to other groups!
The Discourse Dynamics Model: Developing a complexity metaphor for ELT. Paper presented by Lynne Cameron at the Manchester Roundtable on Complexity and ELT. The University of Manchester, 15 April 2015
The Discourse Dynamics Model: Developing a complexity metaphor for ELT. Paper presented by Lynne Cameron at the Manchester Roundtable on Complexity and ELT. The University of Manchester, 15 April 2015
Cognitive Discourse Analysis: Frame analysis (LANCOM 3) Jelec Anna
Would you like to learn how to find and recognise frames? This week we are going to apply the knowledge about frames to analysing text. We are going to go through the basics of frame analysis and watch a video to find out the frames.
Can you identify why the term "greenhouse effect" did not prove effective in convincing Americans to act against global warming? I
Cognitive Discourse Analysis: Introduction (LANCOM 1) Jelec Anna
Discourse analysis is based on the assumption that context is fundamental for our understanding of text. The social context (such as education or politics), the thing accomplished by the text (e.g., legislation, teaching), the participants and their various communicative, social and professional roles, the relations between them, the setting (time, location) and other social or interactional properties of the communicative event are all relevant to understanding the discourse behind it (van Dijk 2000). Cognitive discourse analysis uses what we know about cognitive processing to understand and create discourse.
Images of Complexity in the Practice of Language Teaching and Learning. Paper presented by Juup Stelma at the Manchester Roundtable on Complexity and ELT. The University of Manchester, 15 April 2015
What Are Metaphors?
Metaphors As A Metaphor
Metaphor In Talk Essay
Metaphors And Figurative Language
Life Metaphors And Similes Essay
Metaphor Essay Metaphor
What Does Metaphor Mean
Example Of A Metaphor
Metaphor In The Metaphor
Conceptual Metaphors Essay
Experience With Metaphors
Metaphors We Live By Essay examples
Summary Of Metaphors We Live By
Metaphors We Live By Summary
Life with Metaphors Essay
Main Concepts Of Metaphors
Life goes on (Metaphor essay )
My Metaphor Essay
How To Write A Metaphor
Metaphor: A Short Story
The Edge of Linguistics lecture series from Prof. Fredreck J. Newmeyer
During Oct 7 to Oct 17, Prof. Newmeyer offered a lecture series on a wide range of linguistic topics in Beijing Language and Culture University.
Lecture 1: The Chomskyan Revolution
Lecture 2: Constraining the Theory
Lecture 3: The Boundary between Syntax and Semantics
Lecture 4: The Boundary between Competence and Performance
Lecture 5: Can One Language Be ‘More Complex’ Than Another?
Background:
Fredreck J. Newmeyer is Professor Emeritus of Linguistics at the University of Washington and adjunct professor in the University Of British Columbia Department Of Linguistics and the Simon Fraser University Department of Linguistics. He has published widely in theoretical and English syntax.
Detecting Deception (400 Words) - PHDessay.com. Theme Of Deception in "Othello" Free Essay Example. Deception essay‘Should participants ever be deceived concerning the .... Deception in the Investigative, Interrogative, and Testimonial .... Deception In Psychological Research Free Essay Example. Deception. Essays from the Outis Project on Deception - Zeta Books Online. Self Deception | Clinical Psychology | Psychology & Cognitive Science. Discuss the theme of deception in Shakespeare's - GCSE English - Marked .... Denial and deception Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays .... Theme of deception in macbeth essay. Discuss the theme of deception in - GCSE English - Marked by Teachers.com. Measure for Measure essay plan - Deception | Teaching Resources. Deception by the Investigating Officer Essay Example | Topics and Well .... FREE Essay on Deception and Much … - frudgereport555.web.fc2.com. Deception - creative writing. - GCSE English - Marked by Teachers.com. Select several deception techniques and evaluate whether you think they .... A Guide To Deception | A guide to deduction, Guide to manipulation .... Detecting Deception in an Apology | Deception | Emotions. (PDF) Theorizing About Deception. (PDF) Deception in research. “I Don’t Know Where He is Not”: Does Deception Research yet Offer a .... Deception essay | Hyderabad. (PDF) Book review essay: Doctors of Deception -- What They Don't Want .... Macbeth deception essay - Reliable Essay Writers That Deserve Your Trust. ᐅ Essays On Deception
Poetry explication essay - Orozco 1 Poetry Explication Essay Edgar .... Here is an example of an explication. Example Of Explication - Printable Templates Free.
Great creative leaders (witness Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech) use metaphor a great deal to illustrate, persuade and inspire. Metaphors influence how you think and how you act. In this document, we explore the use of metaphor and its structure. We show how metaphors help shape your thinking and the thinking of others. We illustrate how you can use them in practical ways in work and workshops to transform teams.
AlMeteb 1Essay 3 Examination of a WordAssignment This 4 .docxgalerussel59292
AlMeteb 1
Essay 3: Examination of a Word
Assignment: This 4 to 6 page essay will require you to choose one meaningful word to you. It can be a word for which you are already very familiar, or a new word you learned this semester; however, it must be a content word rather than a function word, as we discussed in class (i.e. content words are nouns, adjectives, adverbs, and full verbs, whereas function words are prepositions, pronouns, determiners, conjunctions, particles and auxiliary verbs). In this academic, thesis driven essay, you should:
· carefully define what the word is and its part of speech (which could be included in the definition)
· explain why the word is meaningful to you, including how and why you interpret the word the way you do
· argue why it’s a significant word in our language today
· illustrate how the word has changed over time (i.e. sick used to mean “physically ill,” now it has evolved into “cool” or “awesome”)
· describe in detail how this word could potentially affect other people who hear it, or are called it
· describe how the word affects you
If you need help expanding your essay, consider these questions as you construct your work:
· Why did you decide to choose this word?
· Most words change in their definition over time; to what extent has this word you’ve chosen changed? Has it changed very much? Very little? In what way?
· Do you wish to argue that the word’s meaning should be changed?
· Do you have a significant personal experience with this word? Did hearing this word, or being called this word, make you feel great? Happy? Enthusiastic? Offended? Sad? Angry?
Ultimately, the essay should concern itself with the word’s meaning to you and how you perceive its impact on other people, not what the dictionary or other people perceive it to be. You must, however, cite the dictionary to define the word in contrast to how you define it, and at least two other academic sources (you may not use Wikipedia).
Objectives:
· demonstrate your expertise in structuring paragraphs in the statement, support, example method
· effectively use the rhetorical tools of definition, cause and effect, and argument and persuasion to clearly express your thoughts
· illuminate the exigence (or important purpose) of your topic
· produce writing that contains vivid details, significance, and evidence that supports claims that you make (i.e. what do you want a reader to learn from what you’ve written based on a combination of facts and opinions?)
· exhibit critical thinking skills that prove you’ve carefully reflected on the topic
Rules:
· must use a minimum of three academic sources
· must adhere to MLA format
· must be carefully proofread, and checked for grammar and spelling
· must be stapled, typewritten in 12 point Times New Roman Font
· thoughtfully titled
· must follow explicitly what this assignment is asking you to do
· must not be a narrative essay that tells a story; this is a research paper based on your observations a.
Terministic Screens Chapter Three Terministi.docxtodd191
Terministic Screens
Chapter Three
Terministic Screens
1
Directing the Attention
We might begin by stressing the distinction between a "scientistic" and a
"dramatistic" approach to the nature of language. A "scientistic" approach
begins with questions of naming, or definition. Or the power of language to
define and describe may be viewed as derivative; and its essential function
may be treated as attitudinal or hortatory: attitudinal as with expressions of
complaint, fear, gratitude, and such; hortatory as with commands or
requests, or, in general, an instrument developed through its use in the social
processes of cooperation and competition. I say "developed"; I do not say
"originating." The ultimate origins of language seem to me as mysterious as
the origins of the universe itself. One must view it, I feel, simply as the
"given." But once an animal comes into being that does happen to have this
particular aptitude, the various tribal idioms are unquestionably developed
by their use as instruments in the tribe's way of living (the practical role of
symbolism in what the anthropologist, Malinowski, has called "context of
situation"). Such considerations are involved in what 1 mean by the
"dramatistic," stressing language as an aspect of "action," that is, as
"symbolic action."
The two approaches, the "scientistic" and the "dramatistic" (language
as definition, and language as act) are by no means mutually exclusive.
Since both approaches have their proper uses, the distinction is not being
introduced invidiously. Definition itself is a symbolic act, just as my
proposing of this very distinction is a symbolic act. But though at this
moment of beginning, the overlap is considerable, later the two roads
diverge considerably, and direct our attention to quite different kinds of
observation. The quickest way to indicate the differences of direction might
be by this formula: The "scientistic" approach builds the edifice of language
with primary stress upon a proposition such as "It is, or it is not." The
"dramatistic" approach puts the primary stress upon such hortatory
expressions as "thou shalt, or thou shalt not." And at the other extreme the
distinction be-
45
comes quite obvious, since the scientistic approach culminates in the kinds
of speculation we associate with symbolic logic,
while the dramatisdc culminates in the kinds of speculation that
find their handiest material in stories, plays, poems, the rhetoric of oratory
and advertising, mythologies, theologies, and philosophies
after the classic model.
The dramatistic view of language, in terms of
"symbolic action," is exercised about the necessarily suasive
nature of even the most unemotional scientific nomenclatures. And we shall
proceed along those lines; thus:
Even if any given terminology is a reflection of reality, by its very
nature as a terminology it must be a selection of reality; and to th.
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II
SAMPLE TOUCHSTONE AND SCORING
Logan Stevens
English Composition II
December 20, 2019
Where’s the Beef?: Ethics and the Beef Industry
Americans love their beef. Despite the high rate of its consumption, in recent years
people in the United States have grown increasingly concerned about where their food comes
from, how it is produced, and what environmental and health impacts result from its production.
These concerns can be distilled into two ethical questions: is the treatment of cattle humane and
is there a negative environmental impact of beef production? For many, the current methods of
industrial beef production and consumption do not meet personal ethical or environmental
standards. Therefore, for ethical and environmental reasons, people should limit their beef
consumption.
The first ethical question to consider is the humane treatment of domesticated cattle. It
has been demonstrated in multiple scientific studies that animals feel physical pain as well as
emotional states such as fear (Grandin & Smith, 2004, para. 2). In Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations (CAFOs), better known as “factory farms” due to their industrialized attitude toward
cattle production, cattle are often confined to unnaturally small areas; fed a fattening, grain-based
diet; and given a constant stream of antibiotics to help combat disease and infection. In his essay,
“An Animal’s Place,” Michael Pollan (2002) states that beef cattle often live “standing ankle
Comment [SL1]: Hi Logan! This is a great title.
Comment [SL2]: It will help strengthen your opening
sentence to include some sort of facts or statistics about
beef consumption in America.
Comment [SL3]: Throughout your essay, you talk about
more than just limiting the consumption of beef. How could
you strengthen your Thesis Statement to connect all of
those points?
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II
SAMPLE TOUCHSTONE AND SCORING
deep in their own waste eating a diet that makes them sick” (para. 40). Pollan describes
Americans’ discomfort with this aspect of meat production and notes that they are removed from
and uncomfortable with the physical and psychological aspects of killing animals for food. He
simplifies the actions chosen by many Americans: “we either look away—or stop eating
animals” (para. 32). This decision to look away has enabled companies to treat and slaughter
their animals in ways that cause true suffering for the animals. If Americans want to continue to
eat beef, alternative, ethical methods of cattle production must be considered.
The emphasis on a grain-based diet, and therefore a reliance on mono-cropping, also
contributes to the inefficient use of available land. The vast majority of grain production (75-
90% depending on whether corn or soy) goes to feeding animals rather than humans, and cattle
alone .
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II .docxwilliame8
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II
SAMPLE TOUCHSTONE AND SCORING
Nyeri Robison
Sophia Pathways
Comp II
December 4, 2019
Who’s Hooked on Stanley Fish?: An Interpretation of Reader-Response Theory
In 1980, literary scholar Stanley Fish published his famous book Is There a Text in this Class?
Most widely-read from this text is the self-titled thirteenth chapter, which is seen as one of the primary
texts that sparked what is known as ‘reader-response theory.’ This theory, some might know, is the
belief that all readers can and do make their own meanings of texts, whether those be novels, stories,
poems, plays, films, or even text-messages shared between friends. Such reader-made meanings or
‘responses’ are often separated and completely different from the intent of the text’s author; instead,
they are mostly shaped by our communities – schools and classrooms, churches and religious groups,
businesses and neighborhoods, families and friends, to list just a few examples– which offer and teach
us different strategies to interpret texts and construct meanings. In other words, there are no fixed,
objective, pre-determined textual meanings; rather we invent meanings as we encounter texts wearing
the lenses of our own histories, personal experiences, sets of knowledge, and worldviews. This rather
postmodern philosophy, however, is one that I want to challenge in part, since I believe it can work
ironically to reinforce dominant power-structures and the status quo in our society.
To understand the possible critiques of Stanley Fish’s theories, however, one must first
understand what he argues. In “Is There a Text in This Class?” Fish works to calm the fears of other
Comment [SL1]: Hi Nyeri! I’m looking forward to reading
your essay today!
Comment [SL2]: It’d be a good idea to introduce who
Stanley Fish is and why this article was written in the first
place.
Comment [SL3]: This is a good summary of the theory
presented. It would be good to lead off with what the article
touched on first, then go into more detail about the theory
that is presented.
Comment [SL4]: Great thesis statement!
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II
SAMPLE TOUCHSTONE AND SCORING
literary scholars who think we need objective meanings in texts, standardized methods of interpreting
these meanings, and prescribed ways of teaching students those methods. They believe that these
strategies are required to prevent a fragmentation and eventual breakdown of meaning into an infinite,
disorienting cloud of unique and isolated subjective interpretations. For example, in the case of Hamlet,
what would happen if we strayed so far from Shakespeare’s intent for the play and interpreted it as
being about space aliens taking the forms of royalty in the Danish court? What if the reader (the
Subject) got too far from the text (the Object)? It is this fears that Fish tri.
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II .docxrosemariebrayshaw
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II
SAMPLE TOUCHSTONE AND SCORING
Nyeri Robison
Sophia Pathways
Comp II
December 4, 2019
Who’s Hooked on Stanley Fish?: An Interpretation of Reader-Response Theory
In 1980, literary scholar Stanley Fish published his famous book Is There a Text in this Class?
Most widely-read from this text is the self-titled thirteenth chapter, which is seen as one of the primary
texts that sparked what is known as ‘reader-response theory.’ This theory, some might know, is the
belief that all readers can and do make their own meanings of texts, whether those be novels, stories,
poems, plays, films, or even text-messages shared between friends. Such reader-made meanings or
‘responses’ are often separated and completely different from the intent of the text’s author; instead,
they are mostly shaped by our communities – schools and classrooms, churches and religious groups,
businesses and neighborhoods, families and friends, to list just a few examples– which offer and teach
us different strategies to interpret texts and construct meanings. In other words, there are no fixed,
objective, pre-determined textual meanings; rather we invent meanings as we encounter texts wearing
the lenses of our own histories, personal experiences, sets of knowledge, and worldviews. This rather
postmodern philosophy, however, is one that I want to challenge in part, since I believe it can work
ironically to reinforce dominant power-structures and the status quo in our society.
To understand the possible critiques of Stanley Fish’s theories, however, one must first
understand what he argues. In “Is There a Text in This Class?” Fish works to calm the fears of other
Comment [SL1]: Hi Nyeri! I’m looking forward to reading
your essay today!
Comment [SL2]: It’d be a good idea to introduce who
Stanley Fish is and why this article was written in the first
place.
Comment [SL3]: This is a good summary of the theory
presented. It would be good to lead off with what the article
touched on first, then go into more detail about the theory
that is presented.
Comment [SL4]: Great thesis statement!
Sophia Pathways for College Credit – English Composition II
SAMPLE TOUCHSTONE AND SCORING
literary scholars who think we need objective meanings in texts, standardized methods of interpreting
these meanings, and prescribed ways of teaching students those methods. They believe that these
strategies are required to prevent a fragmentation and eventual breakdown of meaning into an infinite,
disorienting cloud of unique and isolated subjective interpretations. For example, in the case of Hamlet,
what would happen if we strayed so far from Shakespeare’s intent for the play and interpreted it as
being about space aliens taking the forms of royalty in the Danish court? What if the reader (the
Subject) got too far from the text (the Object)? It is this fears that Fish tri.
Similar to Bartłomiej rostek & przemysław pszczoliński metaphors we live by no more (20)
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Bartłomiej rostek & przemysław pszczoliński metaphors we live by no more
1. Isolating tendencies in the Conceptual Metaphor Theory.
Bartłomiej Rostek & Przemysław Pszczoliński
2. SYNONYMY
LOVE IS A JOURNEY:
Source: journey
Target: love
1. the travelers
1. the lovers
2. the vehicle
2. the love relationship itself
3. the journey
3. events in the relationship
4. the distance covered
4. the progress made
5. the obstacles encountered
5. the difficulties experienced
6. decisions about which way to go
6. choices about what to do
7. the destination of the journey
7. the goal(s) of the relationship
3. LIFE IS A JOURNEY
Source: JOURNEY
Target: LIFE
1. the travelers
1. the people
2. the vehicle
2. the life itself
3. the journey
3. events in the life
4. the distance covered
4. the progress made
5. the obstacles encountered
5. the difficulties experienced
6. decisions about which way to go
6. choices about what to do
7. the destination of the journey
7. the goal(s) of the life
4. Inconsistencies
Progress
Difficulty
Choices
People (as separate units can well be lovers )
The same vocabulary for two
completely different concepts which
points out the fact that we came
across synonymy
At the very beginning it can be easily noted that structural metaphors do not provide
a proper delineation of the two given concepts but only makes them look like
synonymous notions.
Moreover, Kovecses in his book Mind, Metaphor, and Culture (2006) claims that
mappings are static, conventionalized, supraindividual correspondences between
source domain and target domain. If so, apart the fact that these thoroughly different
emotions are both understood in terms of journey, we are apparently given the
universal understanding of the concept of LOVE or LIFE as supraindividual means
characteristic of many communities. Hence we are lead to think that everyone has the
same idea of LOVE as these which are presented by Kovecses.
5. But is it really the proper reasoning? Are the metaphors and their mappings
(submetaphors) applicable then to any range of the situations for the every user
of English language ?
Obviously they are not. Why? Because, as Anna Wierzbicka also argues, their
use is limited to the kind of affection occurring between, for example, erotic
partners while not to the love between a mother and a child. “This means that
„journey‟ is not in any way included in the semantic invariant of the concept „love‟
”. Instead she proposes the following model:
X loves (person) Y.= when X thinks of Y, X feel good feelings towards Y
X feels that he wants to be with Y
X feels that he wants to cause good things to happen to Y
6. Wierzbicka (1999: 14) postulates the understanding of emotions basing on „prototypes‟
(the standardized modes of semantic description) which works perfectly well, although
only out of context.
This is because our cognition is:
dynamic which may bring asymetries in conceptualization based on various degress
of prominence
disengaged – we think without useless details accessing the abstarct domain
immediately with no need of going through concrete domain first. Thought is always
less detailed than real experience as we only stimulate attenuating memories.
7. In such a case it can be easily noted that both theories proposed by Kovecses and
Wierzbicka were carefully structured just to prove their ideas, hence they are expert
models, not usage based.
Moreover, Kovecses‟s mappings of love and life projected onto target domain only show
the most important instances appearing in linguistic examples, like it also is in case of the
THEORY IS BUILDING metaphor. Thence it turns out that this type of metaphors only
highlights the most important aspects whereas others are hidden.
THEORY IS BUILDING
The process of building
The physical structure of the building.
The strength.
structure
construction
strength
Highlighting and hiding
8. Additionally, Kövecses proposes that LOVE IS A FLUID IN A CONTAINER to be a
conceptual metaphor of this emotion and gives examples like “She was overflowing with
love” (2000: 26). In general, the CONTAINER image schema, akin to JOURNEY image
schema, can be applied to many other emotions such as PRIDE, SADNESS, FEAR, or
HAPPINESS (Kövecses 2000: 20-30), which yet again proves that in such an instance these
concepts do not have any structure.
The CONTAINER has a top and a bottom, which makes it possible to implement
the metaphor MORE IS UP. These two metaphors work together, so that an
increase in emotional intensity is conceptualized as a rise of the FLUID in the
CONTAINER (Kövecses 1990: 147). Accordingly, an empty CONTAINER
indicates the absence of the emotion. Interestingly, the metaphors LOVE IS A
CONTAINER and LOVE IS A FLUID IN A CONTAINER oppose each other. On
the one hand, LOVE is depicted as some external room or space which we can
enter, leave or get lost in, on the other hand it is perceived of as something
contained inside of us. [internet source 1]
Once again we can see that CMT is the isolating model.
9. The Inconsistencies in the classification of
metaphors and the choice of source domains
AN ARGUMENT IS WAR linguistic expressions ( Kövecses 2002: 5):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Your claims are indefensible.
He attacked every weak point in my argument.
His criticisms were right on target.
I demolished his argument.
I‟ve never won an argument with him.
You disagree? Okay, shoot!
If you use that strategy, he‟ll wipe you out.
He shot down all of my arguments.
10. The misclassification of metaphors
3. His criticisms were right on target.
Instance (3) is a linguistic expression of AN ARGUMENT IS WAR
conceptual metaphor. Why not AN ARGUMENT IS HUNTING?
4. I demolished his argument.
(4) is yet another linguistic expression of AN ARGUMENT IS WAR
conceptual metaphor. Why not AN ARGUMENT IS A BUILDING
[and consequently a line of reasoning in (4) is a part of the
building]?
5. I‟ve never won an argument with him.
Similarly in (5), the sentence is said to be a linguistic expression of
AN ARGUMENT IS WAR. And why not AN ARGUMENT IS A
CONTEST?
11. There is no evidence that the notion of war is closer to the experience,
and thus understanding, of an average speaker than the notions like
hunting or a building.
The provided instances of AN ARGUMENT IS WAR linguistic
expressions may as well be linguistic expressions of different
conceptual metaphors. Thus, the provided classification reflects only
Kövecses‟s interpretation of the examples.
12. abstract [Target Domain]
„It was also noted that the source domains are typically more
concrete or physical and more clearly delineated concepts than the
targets, which tend to be fairly abstract and less delineated ones.” (
Kövecses 2002: 15)
Kövecses claims the notion of war to be a conventional source
domain. The question is: which of these notions, a war or an
argument, is less abstract and more familiar to an average speaker?
In this example, Kövecses suggests that understanding of an
ordinary human experience, an argument, is provided through other
more abstract notion – a war.
13. What is the source of these
inconsistencies?
According to CMT, data for the analysis can be only gathered
from introspection or provided by an expert or dictionary.
Therefore, CMT is an expert model that is not based on a
linguistic corpus and reflects only the conceptualisation of the
expert conducting the research. In other words, the provided
instances have been prefabricated by Kövecses and reflect only
his conceptualisation.
CMT is an expert model = CMT is an isolating model
14. REFERENCES:
1. Wierzbicka, Anna 1999 Emotions Across Languages and Cultures:
Diversity and Universals Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2. Kövecses, Zoltán 2002 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction New York:
Oxford University Press, Inc
3. The online journal metaphorik.de 16/2009, 87-105
4. Kövecses, Zoltán 2000 Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture,
and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.