The document summarizes a presentation on light fields and the Wigner distribution function. It begins with introducing traditional light fields and their limitations in modeling diffraction and interference effects. It then describes how augmenting light fields can address these limitations by incorporating wave optics concepts like the Wigner distribution function. The presentation provides examples of how augmented light fields can model interference patterns from experiments like Young's double slit experiment. It concludes by discussing properties of the Wigner distribution function and how it relates to modeling light fields.
Presentation held by Tom Bert, Senior Product Manager Digital Cinema at Barco, on the occasion of the Big Screen Experience Program during the IBC tradeshow and conference in Amsterdam in September 2016. The program allowed for cinema professionals to explore the latest developments in the industry.
Presentation held by Tom Bert, Senior Product Manager Digital Cinema at Barco, on the occasion of the Big Screen Experience Program during the IBC tradeshow and conference in Amsterdam in September 2016. The program allowed for cinema professionals to explore the latest developments in the industry.
Mini lesson on achieving Coherence in writing. Give it a try! But before you do, why not try some Coherent Breathing (i.e., breathing "from the heart")- to get in the mood?
Optical Micro-mechatronic Systems Integrated on Printed Circuit BoardsSERHAN ISIKMAN
A polymer scanner actuates a lens to achieve dynamic focusing of a laser spot on a target, while scanning a second lens to collect the reflected light. This synchronous scanning and detection enables extended range imaging of targets such as bar-codes, etc.
Micro-optics is an indispensable key enabling technology (KET) for many applications today. The important role of micro-optical components is based on three different motivations: miniaturization, high functionality and packaging aspects. It is obvious that miniaturized systems require micro-optics for light focusing, light shaping and imaging. More important for industrial applications is the high functionality of micro-optics that allows combining these different functions in one element. In DUV Lithography Steppers and Scanners an extremely precise beam shaping of the Excimer laser profile is required. High-precision diffractive optical elements are well suited for this task. For Wafer-Level Cameras (WLC) and fiber optical systems the packaging aspects are more important. Wafer-Level Micro-Optics technology allows manufacturing and packaging some thousands of sub-components in parallel. We report on the state of the art in wafer-based manufacturing, testing and packaging.
Keywords: Micro-optics, microlens array, diffractive optical elements, wafer-level optics, wafer-level packaging, beam shaping, fiber coupling, array illumination, Shack-Hartmann, confocal microscope, slow-axis collimator.
Semiconductor lasers are ideally suited for mass production and widespread applications, because they are based on a wafer-scale technology with a high level of integration. Not surprisingly, the first lasers entering virtually every household were semiconductor lasers in compact disk players. A new ultrafast semiconductor laser concept has been introduced by Prof. Keller, which is power scalable, suitable for pulse repetition rate scaling in the 10 to 100 GHz regime, supports both optical and electrical pumping and allows for wafer-scale fabrication. This class of devices is referred to as the modelocked integrated external-cavity surface emitting laser (MIXSEL). The next step towards even lower-cost and more compact ultrafast lasers will be electrical pumping with both pico- and femtosecond pulses. This would result in devices ideally suited for many applications such as telecommunications, optical clocking, frequency metrology, high resolution nonlinear multiphoton microscopy, optical coherence tomography, laser display . anywhere where the current ultrafast laser technology is considered to be too bulky or expensive.
The project aims to demonstrate optically and electrically pumped MIXSELs in both the pico- and femtosecond regime. Picosecond MIXSELs are ideally suited for clocking applications whereas femtosecond MIXSELs are required for continuum generation and many biomedical applications. For both cases, average powers above 100 mW with electrical pumping and above 500 mW with optical pumping should be reached, which represent significant advances of ultrafast MIXSELs.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
Augmenting Light Field
1. Light Fields in Ray and Wave Optics
Introduction to Light Fields:
Ramesh Raskar
Wigner Distribution Function to explain Light Fields:
Zhengyun Zhang
Break
Augmenting LF to explain Wigner Distribution Function:
Se Baek Oh
Q&A
Light Fields with Coherent Light:
Anthony Accardi
New Opportunities and Applications:
Raskar and Oh
Q&A:
All
2. Space of LF representations
Time-frequency representations
Phase space representations
Quasi light field
Other LF
representations
Observable
LF
WDF
Augmented
LF
Other LF
Traditional
representations light field
incoherent
Rihaczek
Distribution
Function
coherent
3. Augmenting Light Fields
explaining Wigner Distribution Function with LF
Se Baek Oh
Postdoctoral Associate
3D Optical Systems Group, Dept. of Mechanical Eng.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4. Traditional
Light Field
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 4
5. Motivation
Traditional
Light Field
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 5
6. Motivation
light field
direction
position (θ, φ) radiance of ray
Traditional
(x, y)
Light Field L(x, y, θ, φ)
ref. plane
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 5
7. Motivation
Traditional
Light Field
http://graphics.stanford.edu
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 5
8. Motivation
Traditional
Light Field
ray optics based
simple and powerful
http://graphics.stanford.edu
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 5
9. Motivation
Wigner
Distribution
Function
Traditional
Light Field
ray optics based
simple and powerful
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 6
10. Motivation
rigorous but cumbersome
wave optics based
Wigner
Distribution
Function
Traditional
Light Field
ray optics based
simple and powerful
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 6
11. Motivation
rigorous but cumbersome
wave optics based
Wigner
Distribution
Function
holograms beam shaping
Traditional
Light Field
1µm 1µm
ray optics based
simple and powerful rotational PSF
limited in diffraction & interference
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 6
12. Augmented LF
rigorous but cumbersome
wave optics based
Wigner
Distribution
Function
Traditional
Light Field
ray optics based
simple and powerful
limited in diffraction & interference
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 7
13. Augmented LF
rigorous but cumbersome
wave optics based
Wigner WDF
Distribution
Function Augmented LF
Traditional Traditional
Light Field Light Field
ray optics based
simple and powerful
limited in diffraction & interference
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 7
14. Augmented LF
rigorous but cumbersome
wave optics based
Wigner WDF
Distribution
Function Augmented LF
Traditional Traditional
Light Field Light Field
ray optics based
simple and powerful Interference & Diffraction
limited in diffraction & interference Interaction w/ optical elements
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 7
15. Augmented LF
rigorous but cumbersome
wave optics based
Wigner WDF
Distribution
Function Augmented LF
Traditional Traditional
Light Field Light Field
ray optics based
simple and powerful Interference & Diffraction
limited in diffraction & interference Interaction w/ optical elements
Non-paraxial propagation
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 7
16. Augmented LF
• not a new light field
• a new methodology/framework to create,
modulate, and propagate light fields
• stay purely in position-angle space
• wave optics phenomena can be understood
with the light field
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 8
17. Augmented LF framework
LF
(diffractive)
optical
element
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 9
18. Augmented LF framework
LF LF
(diffractive)
optical
element
LF propagation
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 9
19. Augmented LF framework
light field
transformer
LF LF LF
negative
radiance
(diffractive)
optical
element
LF propagation
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 9
20. Augmented LF framework
light field
transformer
LF LF LF LF
negative
radiance
(diffractive)
optical
element
LF propagation LF propagation
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 9
21. Augmented LF framework
light field
transformer
LF LF LF LF
negative
radiance
(diffractive)
optical
element
LF propagation LF propagation
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 9
22. Augmented LF framework
light field
transformer
LF LF LF LF
negative
radiance
(diffractive)
optical
element
LF propagation LF propagation
Diffraction can be included in the light field framework!
Tech report, S. B. Oh et al. http://web.media.mit.edu/~raskar/RayWavefront/
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 9
23. outline
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 10
24. outline
• Limitations of Light Field analysis
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 10
25. outline
• Limitations of Light Field analysis
• Augmented Light Field
• free-space propagation
u u
x x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 10
26. outline
• Limitations of Light Field analysis
• Augmented Light Field
• free-space propagation
• virtual light projector in the ALF
• coherence
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 10
27. outline
• Limitations of Light Field analysis
• Augmented Light Field
• free-space propagation
• virtual light projector in the ALF
• coherence (x1 , θ1 ) (x2 , θ2 )
• light field transformer L1 (x1 , θ1 ) L2 (x2 , θ2 )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 10
28. Assumptions
• monochromaticinto polychromatic coherent)
(= temporally
•can be extended
• flatland extendedobservation plane)
(= 1D
• can be to the real world
• scalarbefield and into polarized lightone polarization)
diffraction (=
• can extended
• no non-linear effect (two-photon, SHG, loss,
absorption, etc)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 11
29. Young’s experiment
screen
light from double
a laser slit x
d
I(x)
z 2π d
I(x) = 1 + cos x
λ z
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 12
30. Young’s experiment
screen
light from double
a laser slit x
d
I(x)
z 2π d
I(x) = 1 + cos x
λ z
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 12
31. Young’s experiment
screen
light from double
a laser slit x
d
|r1 − r2 | = mλ
constructive
interference
I(x)
z 2π d
I(x) = 1 + cos x
λ z
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 12
32. Young’s experiment
screen
light from double
a laser slit x
destructive
interference
|r1 − r2 | = (m + 1/2)λ
d
|r1 − r2 | = mλ
constructive
interference
I(x)
z 2π d
I(x) = 1 + cos x
λ z
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 12
33. Young’s experiment
x θ+
θ u (= θ/λ)
A
B A B x A B x
θ−
Light Field WDF
z
ref. plane
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 13
34. Young’s experiment
θ+ x
θ u (= θ/λ)
A
B A B x A B x
θ−
Light Field WDF
z
ref. plane
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 14
35. Young’s experiment
projection projection
θ+ x
θ u (= θ/λ)
A
B A B x A B x
θ−
Light Field WDF
z
I(x) I(x)
ref. plane
3D Optical
x x
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 14
36. Wigner Distribution Function
x x
Wg (x, u) = g x+ g ∗
x− e−j2πx u dx
2 2
space local spatial frequency (u = θ/λ) (= fξ in Zhengyun’s slide)
• local spatial frequency spectrum (similar as wavelet)
• ex) global vs. local frequency in a song
global freq. local freq.
• complex input g(x), WDF is always real
• intensity = projection of WDF along u
• WDF can be defined for light (E-field) as well as optical elements
(e.g., gratings or apertures)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 15
37. Wigner Distribution Function
x x
Wg (x, u) = g x+ g ∗
x− e−j2πx u dx
2 2
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 16
38. Wigner Distribution Function
x x
Wg (x, u) = g x+ g ∗
x− e−j2πx u dx
jαx2
2 2
g(x) = e
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 16
39. Wigner Distribution Function
x x
Wg (x, u) = g x+ g ∗
x− e−j2πx u dx
jαx2
2 2
g(x) = e
“ ”2
x −jα x− x
g ∗
x− =e 2
x 2
“ ”2
x x
jα x+ 2
g x+ =e jα(2xx )
2 e
x
x /2 x /2
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 16
40. Wigner Distribution Function
x x
Wg (x, u) = g x+ g ∗
x− e−j2πx u dx
jαx2
2 2
g(x) = e
“ ”2
x −jα x− x
g ∗
x− =e 2
x 2
“ ”2
x x
jα x+ 2
g x+ =e jα(2xx )
2 e
x x
x /2 x /2
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 16
41. Wigner Distribution Function
x x
Wg (x, u) = g x+ g ∗
x− e−j2πx u dx
jαx2
2 2
g(x) = e
“ ”2
x −jα x− x
g ∗
x− =e 2
x 2
“ ”2
x x
jα x+ 2
g x+ =e jα(2xx )
2 e
x x
.
. x /2 x /2
.
.
.
.
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 16
42. Wigner Distribution Function
x x
Wg (x, u) = g x+ g ∗
x− e−j2πx u dx
jαx2
2 2
g(x) = e
“ ”2
x −jα x− x
g ∗
x− =e 2
x 2
“ ”2
x x
jα x+ 2
g x+ =e jα(2xx )
2 e
x F x
.
. x /2 x /2
.
.
.
.
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 16
43. Wigner Distribution Function
x x
Wg (x, u) = g x+ g ∗
x− e−j2πx u dx
jαx2
2 2
g(x) = e
“ ”2
x −jα x− x
g ∗
x− =e 2
x 2
“ ”2
x x
jα x+ 2
g x+ =e jα(2xx )
2 e
x F x
.
. x /2 x /2
.
. u Wg (x, u)
.
.
x
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 16
44. Wigner Distribution Function
plane wave spherical wave
point source incoherent light
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 17
45. Augmented Light Field
1. free-space propagation
2. virtual light projector with negative radiance
3. light field transformer
46. Free-space propagation
• In homogeneous medium and the paraxial
region,
• LF = ALF = WDF WDF
Augmented LF
Traditional
Light Field
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 19
47. Free-space propagation
• two plane parameterization
equivalent to θ
x x x
x
d
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 20
48. Free-space propagation
• two plane parameterization
equivalent to θ
x x x
x
d
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 21
49. Free space propagation
• wave optics: Huygen’s principle
• point sources on the wavefront
• coherent superposition of wavelets
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 22
50. Free space propagation
• wave optics: Huygen’s principle
• point sources on the wavefront
• coherent superposition of wavelets
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 22
51. Free space propagation
• Mathematical description
j 2π r
e λ
r E-field
jλr
point
source
j 2π r
e λ
(x, y) E(x , y ) = E(x, y) ⊗ (x , y )
jλr
r= (x − x)2 + (y − y)2 + z 2
z
E(x, y) E(x , y )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 23
52. Free space propagation
• Mathematical description
j 2π r
e λ
r E-field
jλr
point
source
j 2π r
e λ
(x, y) E(x , y ) = E(x, y) ⊗ (x , y )
jλr
r= (x − x)2 + (y − y)2 + z 2
z
E(x, y) E(x , y )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 23
53. Free space propagation
• with the paraxial approximation
spherical
wavefront 1
quadratic (x − x)2 + (y − y)2 + z2 ≈z+ (x − x)2 + (y − y)2
wavefront 2z
z
point
source
exp j 2π
λ (x − x)2 + (y − y)2 + z 2
E(x , y ) = E(x, y) dxdy
jλ (x − x)2 + (y − y)2 + z 2
j 2π z
e λ π
≈ E(x, y) exp j [(x − x)2 + (y − y)2 ] dxdy
jλz λz
Fresnel diffraction formula
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 24
54. Free space propagation
• with the paraxial approximation
spherical
wavefront 1
quadratic (x − x)2 + (y − y)2 + z2 ≈z+ (x − x)2 + (y − y)2
wavefront 2z
source & aperture size << z
z
point
source
exp j 2π
λ (x − x)2 + (y − y)2 + z 2
E(x , y ) = E(x, y) dxdy
jλ (x − x)2 + (y − y)2 + z 2
j 2π z
e λ π
≈ E(x, y) exp j [(x − x)2 + (y − y)2 ] dxdy
jλz λz
Fresnel diffraction formula
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 24
55. Fresnel propagation
• w/ WDF x x
E1 (x) E2 (x )
W1 (x, u) W2 (x , u )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 25
56. Fresnel propagation
• w/ WDF x x
E1 (x) E2 (x )
W1 (x, u) W2 (x , u )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 25
57. Fresnel propagation
• w/ WDF x x
E1 (x) E2 (x )
W1 (x, u) W2 (x , u )
W2 (x , u ) = W1 (x − λzu , u )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 25
58. Fresnel propagation
• w/ WDF x x
E1 (x) E2 (x )
W1 (x, u) W2 (x , u )
W2 (x , u ) = W1 (x − λzu , u )
u
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 25
59. Fresnel propagation
• w/ WDF x x
E1 (x) E2 (x )
W1 (x, u) W2 (x , u )
W2 (x , u ) = W1 (x − λzu , u )
u u
x-shear transform
1/(λz)
x x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 25
60. diffraction vs. distance
single slit
a = 64λ
laser
from Zhengyun’s slide
z
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 26
61. diffraction vs. distance
Position and Direction
in Wave Optics
single slit
a = 64λ
laser
from Zhengyun’s slide
z
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 26
62. diffraction vs. distance
Position and Direction
in Wave Optics
near zone: few λ
(evanescent wave) Fresnel regime Fraunhofer regime
(paraxial region) (Far-field)
single slit
a = 64λ
laser
from Zhengyun’s slide
z
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 26
63. diffraction vs. distance
Position and Direction
in Wave Optics
near zone: few λ
(evanescent wave)
1 FN
Fresnel regime
FN 1
Fraunhofer regime
(paraxial region) (Far-field)
non-paraxial
single slit region
a = 64λ
laser
from Zhengyun’s slide
a2
z rule of thumb: Fresnel number FN =
λz
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 26
64. Augmented Light Field
1. free-space propagation
2. virtual light projector with negative radiance
3. light field transformer
65. Virtual light projector
WDF
Augmented LF
Traditional
Light Field
Diffraction and Interference
With simple modifications in Light Field
- virtual light projector (negative radiance)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 28
66. Young’s experiment
x
θ u
A
B A B x A B x
Light Field WDF
ref. plane
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 29
67. Young’s experiment
projection projection
x
θ u
A
B A B x A B x
Light Field WDF
I(x) I(x)
ref. plane
x x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 29
68. Young’s experiment
projection projection
x
θ u
A
B A B x A B x
Light Field WDF
I(x) I(x)
ref. plane
x x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 29
69. Virtual light projector
projection
real projector θ
x
real projector
Augmented LF
intensity=0
Not conflict with physics
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 30
70. Virtual light projector
projection
2π
real projector cos
λ
[a − b]θ θ
negative
virtual light projector positive
at the mid point
x
real projector
Augmented LF
intensity=0
Not conflict with physics
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 30
71. Virtual light projector
first null
real projector (OPD = λ/2)
real projector
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 31
72. Virtual light projector
first null
real projector (OPD = λ/2)
virtual light projector
real projector
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 31
73. Virtual light projector
hyperbola first null
(OPD = λ/2)
asymptote of
λ/2
hyperbola
valid in Fresnel regime
(or paraxial)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 32
74. Virtual light projector
destructive interference
in high school physics class, (need negative radiance from
virtual light projector)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 33
75. Virtual light projector
destructive interference
in high school physics class, (need negative radiance from
virtual light projector)
m = λ/2 m = 3λ/2
m = 5λ/2
m = 7λ/2
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 33
76. Question
• Does a virtual light projector also work for
incoherent light?
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 34
77. Question
• Does a virtual light projector also work for
incoherent light?
• Yes!
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 34
78. Coherence
• Degree of making interference
• coherent partially coherent incoherent
• Correlation of two)points on wavefront
• E(p , t )E (p , t ∗
1 1
(≈phase difference)
2 2
p1
Coherent: deterministic phase relation
Incoherent: uncorrelated phase relation
p2
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 35
79. Coherence
• throwing stones......
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 36
80. Coherence
• throwing stones......
single point source
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 36
81. Coherence
• throwing stones......
single point source
coherent
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 36
82. Coherence
• throwing stones......
single point source many point sources
coherent
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 36
83. Coherence
• throwing stones......
single point source many point sources
coherent if thrown identically, still coherent!
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 36
84. Coherence
• throwing stones......
single point source many point sources
coherent if thrown identically, still coherent!
if thrown randomly, then incoherent!
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 36
85. Coherence
• Temporal coherence: E(p, t )E (p, t ) 1
∗
2
• spectral bandwidth
•
monochromatic: temporally coherent
• broadband (white light): temporally incoherent
• Spatial coherence: E(p1 , t)E ∗ (p2 , t)
• spatial bandwidth (angular span)
• point source: spatially coherent
• extended source: spatially incoherent
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 37
86. Example
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 38
87. Example
Temporally incoherent;
spatially coherent
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 38
88. Example
Temporally incoherent;
spatially coherent
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 38
89. Example
Temporally incoherent;
Temporally & spatially coherent
spatially coherent
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 38
90. Example
Temporally incoherent;
Temporally & spatially coherent
spatially coherent
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 38
91. Example
Temporally incoherent;
Temporally & spatially coherent
spatially coherent
Temporally & spatially incoherent
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 38
92. Example
Temporally incoherent;
Temporally & spatially coherent
spatially coherent
Temporally & spatially incoherent Temporally coherent;
spatially incoherent
?
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 38
93. Example
Temporally incoherent;
Temporally & spatially coherent
spatially coherent
Temporally & spatially incoherent Temporally coherent;
spatially incoherent
rotating
diffuser
laser
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 38
94. Temporal coherence
• Broadband light is incoherent
• ALF (also LF and WDF) can be defined for
different wavelength and treated
independently
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 39
95. Young’s Exp. w/ white light
x
I(x)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 40
96. Young’s Exp. w/ white light
u
Red
x x
u
Green
x
u
Blue
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 41
97. Young’s Exp. w/ white light
Red
I(x)
x
x
Green
I(x)
x
Blue
I(x)
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 42
98. Young’s Exp. w/ white light
Red
x
Green
I(x)
x
Blue
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 42
99. Spatial coherence
• ALF w/ virtual light projectors is defined
for spatially coherent light
• For partially coherent/incoherent light,
adding the defined ALF still gives valid
results!
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 43
100. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
x
I(x)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 44
101. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
x
I(x)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 45
102. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
x
I(x)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 46
103. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
x
w/ random phase
(uncorrelated)
I(x)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 47
104. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
x
w/ random phase
(uncorrelated)
I(x)
spatially incoherent light:
infinite number of waves propagating along all the
direction with random phase delay
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 47
105. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
w/ random
phase
(uncorrelated)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 48
106. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
w/ random
phase
(uncorrelated)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 48
107. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
w/ random
phase
(uncorrelated)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 48
108. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
w/ random
phase
(uncorrelated)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 48
109. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
w/ random
phase
(uncorrelated)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 48
110. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
w/ random
phase
(uncorrelated)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 48
111. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
w/ random
phase
(uncorrelated)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 48
112. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
w/ random
phase Addition
(uncorrelated)
u
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 48
113. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
x
w/ random
phase
(uncorrelated)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 49
114. Young’s Exp. w/ spatially
incoherent light
u
x
x
w/ random
phase Addition
(uncorrelated)
u
x
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 49
115. Virtual light projectors
• Very simple modification to the LF
• interference and diffraction within light
field (geometry based) representation
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 50
116. Augmented Light Field
1. free-space propagation
2. virtual light projector with negative radiance
3. light field transformer
117. Light Field Transformer
WDF
Augmented LF
Light
Field
Interaction at the optical elements
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 52
118. Light Field Transformer
light field
transformer
WDF LF LF LF LF
negative
radiance
Augmented LF (diffractive)
optical
element
Light
Field
LF propagation LF propagation
Interaction at the optical elements
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 52
119. Light Field Transformer
• Q.Virtual light projector for a big aperture?
• put the virtual light projectors for all the
possible pairs of two points
• WDF of optical elements
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 53
120. Light Field Transformer
• Q.Virtual light projector for a big aperture?
• put the virtual light projectors for all the
possible pairs of two points
• WDF of optical elements
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 53
121. Light Field Transformer
• Q.Virtual light projector for a big aperture?
• put the virtual light projectors for all the
possible pairs of two points
equivalent to compute the WDF mathematically....
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 53
122. Light Field Transformer
• Q.Virtual light projector for a big aperture?
• put the virtual light projectors for all the
possible pairs of two points
equivalent to compute the WDF mathematically....
• WDF of optical elements
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 53
123. Light Field Transformer
• Q.Virtual light projector for a big aperture?
• put the virtual light projectors for all the
possible pairs of two points
equivalent to compute the WDF mathematically....
• WDF of optical elements
representing properties of optical elements
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 53
124. Light Field Transformer
Tech report: S. B. Oh et. al
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 54
125. Light Field Transformer
• light field interactions w/ optical elements
(x1 , θ1 ) (x2 , θ2 )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 55
126. Light Field Transformer
• light field interactions w/ optical elements
(x1 , θ1 ) (x2 , θ2 )
L1 (x1 , θ1 )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 55
127. Light Field Transformer
• light field interactions w/ optical elements
(x1 , θ1 ) (x2 , θ2 )
L1 (x1 , θ1 ) L2 (x2 , θ2 )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 55
128. Light Field Transformer
• light field interactions w/ optical elements
(x1 , θ1 ) (x2 , θ2 )
L1 (x1 , θ1 ) L2 (x2 , θ2 )
Light field transformer
T (x2 , x1 , θ1 , θ2 )
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 55
129. Light Field Transformer
Dimension Property Note
8D(4D) thick, shift variant, 8D reflectance field,
T (x2 , x1 , θ1 , θ2 ) angular variant volume hologram
6D(3D) thin, shift variant, 6D display,
T (x, θ1 , θ2 ) angular variant BTF
4D(2D) thin, shift variant,
many optical elements
T (x, θ) angular invariant
2D(1D) attenuation shield field
T (x)
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 56
130. 8D LF Transformer
• the most generalized case
(x1 , θ1 ) (x2 , θ2 )
L2 (x2 , θ2 )
L1 (x1 , θ1 )
L2 (x2 , θ2 ) = T (x2 , θ2 , x1 , θ1 )L1 (x1 , θ1 )dx1 dθ1
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 57
131. 6D LF Transformer
• For thin optical elements
x
6D Display
L2 (x, θ2 )
L1 (x, θ1 )
Courtesy of Martin Fuchs
Bidirectional
L2 (x, θ2 ) = T (x, θ2 , θ1 )L1 (x, θ1 )dθ1 Texture Function
Courtesy of Paul Debevec
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 58
132. er of times with
ference terms are
tood with the in-
the two pinholes
4D LF Transformer
•
Figure 7: Concept of virtual light sources for coherent light.
w/ anglethe LF representation, no interference is predicted. By
In shift invariant elements (in the
paraxial region) virtual light sources, the LF propagation still
including the
n for diffraction
• can be used.
ould be included. e.g. aperture, lens, thin grating, etc
oducing the con-
have negative ra-
es at a and b as
al light source is
π[a − b] λ along
θ
by integrating the
l light sources do
ne, which agrees
Once the virtual L2 (x, θ) = T (x, θ − θ)L1 (x, θ )dθ
propagation still Figure 8: Angle shift invariance in a thin transparency. In
erly modeled3Dby Group (a) and (b), the output rays rotate in the same fashion 59
Se Baek Oh Optical
Systems CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future as
133. Light field transformer
• only amplitude variation (occluders)
x
shield fields for occluders
L2 (x, θ)
L1 (x, θ)
L2 (x, θ) = T (x, θ)L1 (x, θ)
Courtesy of D. Lanman
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 60
134. Applications
On
wavefront coding holography 315
rendering
the screen was very large. As expected, we see (Fig. 9) th
Fraunhofer diffraction pattern.
1.1. Double-helix point spread function (DH-PSF)
A DH-PSF system can be implemented by introducing a phase mask in the Fourier plane of an
otherwise standard imaging system. The phase mask is designed such that its transmittance
function generates a rotating pattern in the focal region of a Fourier transform lens [15-18].
Specifically, the DH-PSF exhibits two lobes that spin around the opticalaperture. An animate
Figure 9: Diffraction from a square axis as shown in Fig.
1(a). Note that DH-PSF displays this experiment with of orientation with defocusappears in
of a significant change varying the aperture size over an
gaussian beam rotating PSF
extended depth. In contrast, the standard PSF presents a slowly changing and expanding
plementary material as a video. The distance from the ap
symmetrical pattern throughout the same region [Fig. 1(b)].
the screen is 1 m.
316
317 Double rectangular apertures: Next we created two r
lar apertures and probe them with the AMP. Note that we
3D Optical Fig. 1. Comparison of the (a) DH-PSF and the (b) standard PSF at different axial planes for a
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future
system with 0.45 numerical aperture (NA) and 633nm wavelength. 61
135. Space of LF representations
Time-frequency representations
Phase space representations
Quasi light field
Other LF
representations
Observable
LF
WDF
Augmented
LF
Other LF
Traditional
representations light field
incoherent
Rihaczek
Distribution
Function
coherent
136. Property of the Representation
Constant along Interference
Non-negativity Coherence Wavelength
rays Cross term
Traditional LF always always only zero no
constant positive incoherent
nearly always any
Observable LF
constant positive coherence any yes
state
only in the positive and
Augmented LF
paraxial region negative any any yes
only in the positive and
WDF
paraxial region negative any any yes
Rihaczek DF no; linear drift complex any any reduced
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 63
137. Benefits & Limitations of the
Representation
Adaptability
Ability to Modeling Simplicity of
to current Near Field Far Field
propagate wave optics computation
pipe line
Traditional
Light Fields x-shear no very simple high no yes
Observable not x-
yes modest low yes yes
Light Fields shear
Augmented
Light Fields x-shear yes modest high no yes
WDF x-shear yes modest low yes yes
better than
Rihaczek DF x-shear yes WDF, not as low no yes
simple as LF
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 64
138. Conclusion
• WDFoptics generalized version of the LF in
wave
is the
• Augmented Light Field
• identicalregion) propagation (in the
paraxial
free-space
• virtual light projectors
• light field transformers
• Wave opticswith geometrical be based
understood
phenomena can
ray
representations
3D Optical
Se Baek Oh Systems Group CVPR 2009 - Light Fields: Present and Future 65
139. Light Fields in Ray and Wave Optics
Introduction to Light Fields:
Ramesh Raskar
Wigner Distribution Function to explain Light Fields:
Zhengyun Zhang
Augmenting LF to explain Wigner Distribution Function:
Se Baek Oh
Q&A
Break
Light Fields with Coherent Light:
Anthony Accardi
New Opportunities and Applications:
Raskar and Oh
Q&A:
All
Editor's Notes
my background
what is the light field?
4D parameterization of plenoptic function, radiance,
4D parameterization of plenoptic function, radiance,
4D parameterization of plenoptic function, radiance,
4D parameterization of plenoptic function, radiance,
4D parameterization of plenoptic function, radiance,
in wave optics, WDF exhibit similar property, compare the two,
in wave optics, WDF exhibit similar property, compare the two,
in wave optics, WDF exhibit similar property, compare the two,
in wave optics, WDF exhibit similar property, compare the two,
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
the motivation, to augment lf, model diffraction in light field formulation
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
more specifically, same lf propagation,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
to demonstrate the limitation of LF,
in terms of lf,
so what is wigner?
recall young&#x2019;s, to make the light field model, we can bring the interference term
recall young&#x2019;s, to make the light field model, we can bring the interference term
recall young&#x2019;s, to make the light field model, we can bring the interference term