1 of 85
Attics: Problems and Solutions
BOABC FALL EDUCATION CONFERENCE
November 16, 2016
Presented by: Lorne Ricketts | MASc, P.Eng.
2 of 85
 Ventilated Attic Performance
 Case Study
 Attic Roof Hut Research
 In Search of Solutions
 Summary
Presentation Overview
3 of 85
An Obvious Problem
4 of 85
A Not So Obvious Problem
5 of 85
Factors Affecting Moisture Problems in Attics
What influences attic moisture issues &
what can we control by design?
 Roof orientation (solar radiation)
 Roof slope (solar radiation)
 Roofing material/color
 Adjacent buildings – shading
 Trees – shading & debris
 Outdoor climate
 Indoor climate
 Roof Leaks
 Insulation R-value
 Air leakage from house
 Duct leakage in attic
 Duct discharge location
 Vent area and distribution
 Sheathing durability
 Roof maintenance
 Other things…
6 of 85
Where are we Seeing the Biggest Issues?
1. Air leakage (ceiling details)
2. Exhaust duct leaks & discharge location (roof, soffit, or wall)
3. Inadequate venting provisions (amount, vent location, or materials)
4. Outdoor moisture: night sky condensation on underside of sheathing
5. Wetting through shingles/roofing (tipping the moisture balance)
7 of 85
The Localized Nature of Air Leakage Condensation
8 of 85
Standard Faith-Based Air-Sealing Approach
Air-sealing details, duct exhaust
details often not provided & left
up to the contractor
9 of 85
The Localized Nature of Leaking Penetrations
10 of 85
Typical Issues – Impact of Orientation
South Facing
North Facing
11 of 85
Typical Issues – Impact of Orientation
North =
Soaked
South (Partially
Shaded) = Damp
12 of 85
Influence of Solar Radiation & Night Sky Radiation
13 of 85
The Nature of Outdoor Moisture Wetting &
Night Sky Condensation
14 of 85
Other Not So Great Ideas…
15 of 85
It Happens in Ventilated Low Slope & Cathedral Ceilings Too
16 of 85
So When Does it Become a Problem?
17 of 85
So When Does it Become a Problem?
18 of 85
So When Does it Become a Problem?
19 of 85
Case Study: Two Steps Forward, One Step Backwards
 2007 investigation of 5 year old large townhouse complex
 Was experiencing many of the typical attic problems
20 of 85
An Assortment of Issues – Exhaust Duct Details
21 of 85
An Assortment of Issues – Exhaust Duct Details
22 of 85
An Assortment of Issues – Inadequate Ridge ‘Vent’ Material
Almost no effective net
free area, 5 layers of filter
fabric
23 of 85
An Assortment of Issues – Ceiling Air Leakage
24 of 85
Attic Remediation (2 Years Later)
25 of 85
Full Review of Initial Contributing Factors - Air-Sealing
26 of 85
Retrofit Ceiling Air Sealing - Sprayfoam
27 of 85
Ceiling Air Sealing – Poly Bags of Fun...
28 of 85
New Exhaust Vent Hoods & Attic Ridge Vents
29 of 85
Mold Remediation - Dry Ice Blasting
30 of 85
2 years after remediation...
31 of 85
Water Leaks Around Plugged Dryer Exhaust Ducts
32 of 85
Lack of Dryer Exhaust Duct Maintenance
33 of 85
Soffit Exhaust Vent Hood Configuration Issues
34 of 85
Air-Sealing Issues
35 of 85
Air-Sealing Issues
36 of 85
But we know how to solve these problems...
Guide to Best Practices for Air Sealing and
Insulation Retrofits - Produced by RDH and published
by BC Housing
37 of 85
Effectiveness of Dry Ice Blasting against Mold?
38 of 85
Water Seepage through Aged & Saturated Asphalt Shingles?
39 of 85
General Mold Growth Not Attributable to Typical Sources
40 of 85
Measuring the Wetting
41 of 85
Key Findings from Field Investigations
 Seeing widespread issues with
mold growth in wood-frame attics in
Coastal Pacific Northwest in past
decade
 Wetting exceeding drying capacity
provided by ventilation
 Problem is most often NOT due to
a lack of ventilation
 Usual culprits of air-leakage
condensation (leaky ceiling, leaky
ducts & discharge point)
 Also seeing supplemental exterior
moisture sources (night sky
condensation, rainwater seepage)
42 of 85
Field Monitoring Study
43 of 85
Industry Trends – Less Heat Flow into Attic Spaces
<1970’s attic construction with
excessive air leakage and heat loss
into the attic
1980’s to 1990’s attic construction with
moderate air leakage and heat loss into
the attic
2000’s attic construction with minimal air
leakage and heat loss into the attic
44 of 85
Research Study
 Controlled field monitoring study
to isolate exterior wetting
mechanisms from interior
sources (air, vapour)
 To specifically evaluate impact of
orientation, slope (3:12, 4:12 and
6:12) & shingle underlay
 Remove influence of air leakage
or heat gain from house
 Monitor the performance of
surface treatments Theoretical attic with no air
leakage or heat loss into
the attic and unrestricted
ventilation
(Arrangement for Study)
Typical ventilated attic
construction with air
leakage and heat loss into
the attic
45 of 85
Roof Test Hut Field Monitoring Setup
a) 3:12 Slope roof with roofing felt underlay b) 4:12 Slope roof with roofing felt underlay
c) 6:12 Slope roof with roofing felt underlay d) 3:12 Control roof with SAM underlay
46 of 85
Roof Test Hut Field Monitoring Setup
47 of 85
Monitoring Equipment & Sensors
Moisture Content, Temperature, Relative
Humidity and surface Condensation sensors –
north and south slopes x 4 huts
48 of 85
Results – Long Term Roof Sheathing Moisture Contents
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
09-2012
10-2012
11-2012
12-2012
01-2013
02-2013
03-2013
04-2013
05-2013
06-2013
07-2013
08-2013
09-2013
10-2013
11-2013
12-2013
01-2014
02-2014
03-2014
MoistureContent[%]
MC-FULL-S-CONT MC-FULL-S-312 MC-FULL-S-412
MC-FULL-S-612 EMC (1 wk)
49 of 85
Results - Seasonal Averages
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Fall 2012 Winter
2012/2013
Spring 2013 Summer
2013
Fall 2013 Winter
2013/2014
Spring 2014
MoistureContent(%)
MC-FULL-N-CONT MC-FULL-S-CONT MC-FULL-N-312 MC-FULL-S-312
MC-FULL-N-412 MC-FULL-S-412 MC-FULL-N-612 MC-FULL-S-612
50 of 85
Long-Term Impacts of Elevated Moisture Contents
North 3:12 after 1 year North 4:12 after 1 year
51 of 85
Tracking Mold Growth
TABLE 2: VITTANEN’S MOLD GROWTH INDEX DESCRIPTIONS
INDEX GROWTH RATE DESCRIPTION
0 No growth Spores not activated
1 Small amounts of mold on surface (microscope) Initial stages of growth
2 <10% coverage of mold on surface (microscope) ___
3 10% – 30% coverage of mold on surface (visual) New spores produced
4 30% – 70% coverage of mold on surface (visual) Moderate growth
5 >70% coverage of mold on surface (visual) Plenty of growth
6 Very heavy and tight growth Coverage around 100%
52 of 85
Tracking Mold Growth – Year 1
53 of 85
Why is the Sheathing Wet? What is the Mechanism?
 Night sky condensation!
(Important: It happen when all moisture sources eliminated.)
Radiative heat loss from roof surface
to colder night sky
54 of 85
When Does it Occur?
55 of 85
When Does it Occur?
0
100
200
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
S
Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312
Increa
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C]
Condensation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C]
MC-FULL-N-312 MC-IN-SURF-N-312 T-IN-N-312-Plywood
T-N-312-Embedded Outdoor - Temperature Outdoor - Dewpoint
COND-N-312 Sheathing Solar Radiation
Condensation
56 of 85
Monitoring Night Sky Cooling Impacts
57 of 85
When Does it Occur?
0
100
200
300
400
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
SolarR
Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312
IncreasingSu
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C]
Condensation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C]
MC-FULL-N-312 MC-IN-SURF-N-312 T-IN-N-312-Plywood
T-N-312-Embedded Outdoor - Temperature Outdoor - Dewpoint
COND-N-312 Sheathing Solar Radiation
Condensation
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
SolarRadiation[W/m2]
Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312
IncreasingSurfaceCondensation
20
25
30
mperature[°C]
20
25
30
emperature[°C]
0
100
200
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312
Inc
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C]
Condensation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06
MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C]
MC-FULL-N-312 MC-IN-SURF-N-312 T-IN-N-312-Plywood
T-N-312-Embedded Outdoor - Temperature Outdoor - Dewpoint
COND-N-312 Sheathing Solar Radiation
Condensation
Heavy Condensation
Daily Solar Radiation
Cycles
Dry
Light Condensation
58 of 85
Shingle & Sheathing Temperature Depressions
2.6 2.5 2.5
2.6
2.4 2.5
0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
312-N 312-S 412-N* 412-S 612-N 612-S
TemperatureDepressionfromAmbient
(°C)
Avg Shingle T Avg Interior Sheathing Surface T
*412-N sheathing temperature unavailable due to sensor malfunction
Average Shingle and Sheathing Temperature Depression compared to
Ambient Temperature for Winter
(December 1, 2013 to January 31, 2014).
59 of 85
Hours of Potential Condensation - Sheathing
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
North South
HoursofPotentialCondensation
TemperatueDepressionfromAmbient(°C)
3:12 Temp 4:12 Temp 6:12 Temp 3:12 Hours 4:12 Hours 6:12 Hours
150 to 300 hours per year
60 of 85
Nuances of Mold on Plywood - Heartwood vs Sapwood
61 of 85
On the Flip Side: Solar Heat Gain & Drying During the Day
62 of 85
On the Flip Side: Solar Heat Gain & Drying Potential
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Aug 21 00:00 Aug 21 06:00 Aug 21 12:00 Aug 21 18:00 Aug 22 00:00
Temperature[°C]
Temperatures - 3:12 and 6:12 Slope Roofs - Early Spring Conditions
T-OUT-N-612-Shingle
T-OUT-S-612-Shingle
T-IN-N-612-Plywood
T-IN-S-612-Plywood
T-OUT-N-312-Shingle
T-OUT-S-312-Shingle
T-IN-N-312-Plywood
T-IN-S-312-Plywood
Outdoor - Dewpoint
Outdoor - Temperature
South Shingles 55°C
North Shingles
35-40°C
South Sheathing = 35°C
North Sheathing = 31°C
Ambient
Air up to
21°C
Lots of cloud cover changes the wetting and drying balance.
63 of 85
A Localized Problem...
Seattle
Portland
Vancouver
San Francisco
Calgary
High Risk Climate for
Night Sky Radiation Attic
Moisture Issues
64 of 85
Key Findings – The Cause of the Pacific Northwest Problems
 Roof sheathing in well ventilated attics (also soffits, canopies) experiences elevated
moisture levels in winter
 Occurs despite elimination of typical wetting mechanisms within attics (air
leakage, duct leakage, rain water leaks etc.)
 Moisture level is above equilibrium level indicating additional wetting sources
 Night sky cooling causes wetting when sheathing drops below ambient dewpoint (few
hundred hours per year) in attic
 Difficult to stop it from occurring
 Fungal growth occurs due to elevated moisture content and condensation on
underside of sheathing
 More fungal growth on north than south – drying matters, the heat from a ceiling
above a house will help too
65 of 85
Monitoring of Potential Mitigation Strategies
 Vented underlayment to
de-couple night sky radiation
cooling effects
 Surface treatments to kill &
prevent fungal growth
66 of 85
Vented Underlay - Night Sky Radiation De-Coupler?
 Vented shingle underlay
installed in one roof in 2nd
year of study
 Purpose: try to de-couple
night sky cooling effects from
sheathing
67 of 85
Vented Underlay – The Double Edged Sword
South Orientation – Vented Underlay vs Direct Applied Shingles
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan 18
SolarRadiation(W/m2)
Temperature(°C)
T-OUT-S-VENT (Shingles) T-IN-S-VENT (Sheathing)
T-OUT-S-312 (Shingles) T-IN-S-312 (Sheathing)
Outdoor T T-Drainmat-S-VENT
Solar Radiation
Shingles – direct applied
Shingles – vent mat
6°C drop in
shingle
1°C drop in
sheathing
68 of 85
Vented Underlay – The Double Edged Sword
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Day Night Avg
Temperature(°C)
MoistureContent(%)
Spring
VENT-N-MC VENT-S-MC 312-N-MC 312-S-MC
VENT-N-T VENT-S-T 312-N-T 312-S-T
North
South
North
South
Vent Normal
Spring (March 1, 2013 to April 30, 2013) Diurnal Moisture Content (SURF) and Temperature
Averages for North and South Oriented Vented and Control (Direct Applied Shingles) Roof
Assemblies
69 of 85
Surface Treatment Application – Round 1
 4 huts x 2 orientations = 8
applications of each
 Fungicides, Cleaners, Sealers
› Boracol® 20-2
› Boracol® 20-2 BD
› Bleach
› Thompson’s WaterSeal®
› Kilz® Paint
 Wood Preservatives
› Copper Naphthenate
› Zinc Naphthenate
70 of 85
Wood Preservative & Fungicide Surface Treatments
When Applied 1 Year Later
Fungal Growth observed is Cladosporium
71 of 85
North vs South Orientation
South North
72 of 85
Visual Assessment of Surface Treatment Efficacy
VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF SURFACE TREATMENT EFFICACY
Test
Roof
Surface Treatments (north left, south right)
Sansin
Boracol®
20-2
Copper
Naphthenate
Bleach
Thompsons
WaterSeal®
Kilz®Paint
Zinc
Naphthenate
Sansin
Boracol®
20-2BD
Control
3:12
4:12
6:12
VISUAL ASSESSMENT SCALE
Pristine or very light fungal growth
Moderate fungal growth
Significant fungal growth
In our experience Kilz® & Boracol® 20-
2BD while okay here after 2 years may
not be best long term for fungal growth
Need duplicate samples – slope not a big factor (heartwood vs
sapwood is)
73 of 85
Wood Preservative & Fungicide Surface Treatments
The best decay fungicide looked okay in years 1 and
2 – but not in year 3
74 of 85
A Caution with Surface Treatments
75 of 85
A Caution with Surface Treatments
76 of 85
A Caution with Surface Treatments
77 of 85
Summary – Mitigation Strategy Performance
 Thermally de-coupling the exposed shingles from the sheathing did
not work well
 Did not significantly increase sheathing temperature at night, but did
reduce drying from solar heat gain
 Surface treatments appear to be a potentially viable solution if right
product is developed – currently available products not quite
effective (nor developed specifically for this application)
 Concurrent work by FP Innovations to perform accelerated testing of
some new biocides/fungicides
 Ongoing monitoring of huts to monitor long-term field performance of
next generation treatments
78 of 85
Concurrent Fungicide/Biocide Research – FP Innovations
 Developed an accelerated 12
week test method to evaluate
new fungicides applied to
wood products
 Have already tested a
handful of newly innovated &
proprietary fungicides &
coatings
 A few promising formulations
completely prevented mold
growth
 Follow-up with field testing
Images courtesy FP Innovations
79 of 85
Field Trials & Monitoring of 9 New Treatments – Round 2
80 of 85
Adapting Surface Treatments for Underside Application
81 of 85
Ongoing Monitoring of New Surface Treatments
Most Promising
fungicide/biocide is water
repelling & contains several
“active” ingredients to
prevent long term mold
growth.
Note it is not a wood
preservative it is a fungicide
Currently undergoing
environmental testing &
available soon?
82 of 85
Relative Risk of Wood-Frame Roof Assemblies
83 of 85
Final Thoughts
 Ventilated attics & roof assemblies ‘built to code’ are experiencing mold
growth on underside of sheathing (plywood or OSB)
 Wetting from night sky condensation and may be exacerbated by air
leaks & water leaks
 Hard to reliably stop night sky condensation
 Ventilation on its own is not a solution
 Mold growth may be minor but perceived as risk
 Could build other roof assemblies but unlikely to replace ventilated attics
any time soon
 Need to address durability & sensitivity of wood based sheathings to mold
growth, various groups are developing products
 Just make sure the fungicide is no more harmful to humans than the
mold is…
84 of 85
Additional Resources
RDH Technical Bulletin No. 10 - Mold in Vented
Wood-Frame Roofs in the Coastal Pacific Northwest
RDH Blog Article – Re-Thinking Ventilated Attics:
How to Stop Mold Growth in Coastal Climates
Why Wood Frame Attics Get Wet & Mouldy in the
Pacific Northwest - Conference Paper at 30th RCI
International Convention & Tradeshow
Guide to Best Practices for Air Sealing and
Insulation Retrofits - Produced by RDH and published
by BC Housing
85 of 85
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE VISIT
 www.rdh.com and www.buildingsciencelabs.com
 Lorne Ricketts - lricketts@rdh.com
Discussion + Questions

Attics: Problems and Solutions

  • 1.
    1 of 85 Attics:Problems and Solutions BOABC FALL EDUCATION CONFERENCE November 16, 2016 Presented by: Lorne Ricketts | MASc, P.Eng.
  • 2.
    2 of 85 Ventilated Attic Performance  Case Study  Attic Roof Hut Research  In Search of Solutions  Summary Presentation Overview
  • 3.
    3 of 85 AnObvious Problem
  • 4.
    4 of 85 ANot So Obvious Problem
  • 5.
    5 of 85 FactorsAffecting Moisture Problems in Attics What influences attic moisture issues & what can we control by design?  Roof orientation (solar radiation)  Roof slope (solar radiation)  Roofing material/color  Adjacent buildings – shading  Trees – shading & debris  Outdoor climate  Indoor climate  Roof Leaks  Insulation R-value  Air leakage from house  Duct leakage in attic  Duct discharge location  Vent area and distribution  Sheathing durability  Roof maintenance  Other things…
  • 6.
    6 of 85 Whereare we Seeing the Biggest Issues? 1. Air leakage (ceiling details) 2. Exhaust duct leaks & discharge location (roof, soffit, or wall) 3. Inadequate venting provisions (amount, vent location, or materials) 4. Outdoor moisture: night sky condensation on underside of sheathing 5. Wetting through shingles/roofing (tipping the moisture balance)
  • 7.
    7 of 85 TheLocalized Nature of Air Leakage Condensation
  • 8.
    8 of 85 StandardFaith-Based Air-Sealing Approach Air-sealing details, duct exhaust details often not provided & left up to the contractor
  • 9.
    9 of 85 TheLocalized Nature of Leaking Penetrations
  • 10.
    10 of 85 TypicalIssues – Impact of Orientation South Facing North Facing
  • 11.
    11 of 85 TypicalIssues – Impact of Orientation North = Soaked South (Partially Shaded) = Damp
  • 12.
    12 of 85 Influenceof Solar Radiation & Night Sky Radiation
  • 13.
    13 of 85 TheNature of Outdoor Moisture Wetting & Night Sky Condensation
  • 14.
    14 of 85 OtherNot So Great Ideas…
  • 15.
    15 of 85 ItHappens in Ventilated Low Slope & Cathedral Ceilings Too
  • 16.
    16 of 85 SoWhen Does it Become a Problem?
  • 17.
    17 of 85 SoWhen Does it Become a Problem?
  • 18.
    18 of 85 SoWhen Does it Become a Problem?
  • 19.
    19 of 85 CaseStudy: Two Steps Forward, One Step Backwards  2007 investigation of 5 year old large townhouse complex  Was experiencing many of the typical attic problems
  • 20.
    20 of 85 AnAssortment of Issues – Exhaust Duct Details
  • 21.
    21 of 85 AnAssortment of Issues – Exhaust Duct Details
  • 22.
    22 of 85 AnAssortment of Issues – Inadequate Ridge ‘Vent’ Material Almost no effective net free area, 5 layers of filter fabric
  • 23.
    23 of 85 AnAssortment of Issues – Ceiling Air Leakage
  • 24.
    24 of 85 AtticRemediation (2 Years Later)
  • 25.
    25 of 85 FullReview of Initial Contributing Factors - Air-Sealing
  • 26.
    26 of 85 RetrofitCeiling Air Sealing - Sprayfoam
  • 27.
    27 of 85 CeilingAir Sealing – Poly Bags of Fun...
  • 28.
    28 of 85 NewExhaust Vent Hoods & Attic Ridge Vents
  • 29.
    29 of 85 MoldRemediation - Dry Ice Blasting
  • 30.
    30 of 85 2years after remediation...
  • 31.
    31 of 85 WaterLeaks Around Plugged Dryer Exhaust Ducts
  • 32.
    32 of 85 Lackof Dryer Exhaust Duct Maintenance
  • 33.
    33 of 85 SoffitExhaust Vent Hood Configuration Issues
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
    36 of 85 Butwe know how to solve these problems... Guide to Best Practices for Air Sealing and Insulation Retrofits - Produced by RDH and published by BC Housing
  • 37.
    37 of 85 Effectivenessof Dry Ice Blasting against Mold?
  • 38.
    38 of 85 WaterSeepage through Aged & Saturated Asphalt Shingles?
  • 39.
    39 of 85 GeneralMold Growth Not Attributable to Typical Sources
  • 40.
    40 of 85 Measuringthe Wetting
  • 41.
    41 of 85 KeyFindings from Field Investigations  Seeing widespread issues with mold growth in wood-frame attics in Coastal Pacific Northwest in past decade  Wetting exceeding drying capacity provided by ventilation  Problem is most often NOT due to a lack of ventilation  Usual culprits of air-leakage condensation (leaky ceiling, leaky ducts & discharge point)  Also seeing supplemental exterior moisture sources (night sky condensation, rainwater seepage)
  • 42.
    42 of 85 FieldMonitoring Study
  • 43.
    43 of 85 IndustryTrends – Less Heat Flow into Attic Spaces <1970’s attic construction with excessive air leakage and heat loss into the attic 1980’s to 1990’s attic construction with moderate air leakage and heat loss into the attic 2000’s attic construction with minimal air leakage and heat loss into the attic
  • 44.
    44 of 85 ResearchStudy  Controlled field monitoring study to isolate exterior wetting mechanisms from interior sources (air, vapour)  To specifically evaluate impact of orientation, slope (3:12, 4:12 and 6:12) & shingle underlay  Remove influence of air leakage or heat gain from house  Monitor the performance of surface treatments Theoretical attic with no air leakage or heat loss into the attic and unrestricted ventilation (Arrangement for Study) Typical ventilated attic construction with air leakage and heat loss into the attic
  • 45.
    45 of 85 RoofTest Hut Field Monitoring Setup a) 3:12 Slope roof with roofing felt underlay b) 4:12 Slope roof with roofing felt underlay c) 6:12 Slope roof with roofing felt underlay d) 3:12 Control roof with SAM underlay
  • 46.
    46 of 85 RoofTest Hut Field Monitoring Setup
  • 47.
    47 of 85 MonitoringEquipment & Sensors Moisture Content, Temperature, Relative Humidity and surface Condensation sensors – north and south slopes x 4 huts
  • 48.
    48 of 85 Results– Long Term Roof Sheathing Moisture Contents 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 09-2012 10-2012 11-2012 12-2012 01-2013 02-2013 03-2013 04-2013 05-2013 06-2013 07-2013 08-2013 09-2013 10-2013 11-2013 12-2013 01-2014 02-2014 03-2014 MoistureContent[%] MC-FULL-S-CONT MC-FULL-S-312 MC-FULL-S-412 MC-FULL-S-612 EMC (1 wk)
  • 49.
    49 of 85 Results- Seasonal Averages 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Fall 2012 Winter 2012/2013 Spring 2013 Summer 2013 Fall 2013 Winter 2013/2014 Spring 2014 MoistureContent(%) MC-FULL-N-CONT MC-FULL-S-CONT MC-FULL-N-312 MC-FULL-S-312 MC-FULL-N-412 MC-FULL-S-412 MC-FULL-N-612 MC-FULL-S-612
  • 50.
    50 of 85 Long-TermImpacts of Elevated Moisture Contents North 3:12 after 1 year North 4:12 after 1 year
  • 51.
    51 of 85 TrackingMold Growth TABLE 2: VITTANEN’S MOLD GROWTH INDEX DESCRIPTIONS INDEX GROWTH RATE DESCRIPTION 0 No growth Spores not activated 1 Small amounts of mold on surface (microscope) Initial stages of growth 2 <10% coverage of mold on surface (microscope) ___ 3 10% – 30% coverage of mold on surface (visual) New spores produced 4 30% – 70% coverage of mold on surface (visual) Moderate growth 5 >70% coverage of mold on surface (visual) Plenty of growth 6 Very heavy and tight growth Coverage around 100%
  • 52.
    52 of 85 TrackingMold Growth – Year 1
  • 53.
    53 of 85 Whyis the Sheathing Wet? What is the Mechanism?  Night sky condensation! (Important: It happen when all moisture sources eliminated.) Radiative heat loss from roof surface to colder night sky
  • 54.
    54 of 85 WhenDoes it Occur?
  • 55.
    55 of 85 WhenDoes it Occur? 0 100 200 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 S Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312 Increa 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C] Condensation 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C] MC-FULL-N-312 MC-IN-SURF-N-312 T-IN-N-312-Plywood T-N-312-Embedded Outdoor - Temperature Outdoor - Dewpoint COND-N-312 Sheathing Solar Radiation Condensation
  • 56.
    56 of 85 MonitoringNight Sky Cooling Impacts
  • 57.
    57 of 85 WhenDoes it Occur? 0 100 200 300 400 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 SolarR Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312 IncreasingSu 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C] Condensation 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C] MC-FULL-N-312 MC-IN-SURF-N-312 T-IN-N-312-Plywood T-N-312-Embedded Outdoor - Temperature Outdoor - Dewpoint COND-N-312 Sheathing Solar Radiation Condensation 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 SolarRadiation[W/m2] Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312 IncreasingSurfaceCondensation 20 25 30 mperature[°C] 20 25 30 emperature[°C] 0 100 200 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 Solar Radiation CONDENSE-Plywood-312 Inc 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C] Condensation 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Oct 02 Oct 03 Oct 04 Oct 05 Oct 06 MoistureContent[%]andTemperature[°C] MC-FULL-N-312 MC-IN-SURF-N-312 T-IN-N-312-Plywood T-N-312-Embedded Outdoor - Temperature Outdoor - Dewpoint COND-N-312 Sheathing Solar Radiation Condensation Heavy Condensation Daily Solar Radiation Cycles Dry Light Condensation
  • 58.
    58 of 85 Shingle& Sheathing Temperature Depressions 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 312-N 312-S 412-N* 412-S 612-N 612-S TemperatureDepressionfromAmbient (°C) Avg Shingle T Avg Interior Sheathing Surface T *412-N sheathing temperature unavailable due to sensor malfunction Average Shingle and Sheathing Temperature Depression compared to Ambient Temperature for Winter (December 1, 2013 to January 31, 2014).
  • 59.
    59 of 85 Hoursof Potential Condensation - Sheathing 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 North South HoursofPotentialCondensation TemperatueDepressionfromAmbient(°C) 3:12 Temp 4:12 Temp 6:12 Temp 3:12 Hours 4:12 Hours 6:12 Hours 150 to 300 hours per year
  • 60.
    60 of 85 Nuancesof Mold on Plywood - Heartwood vs Sapwood
  • 61.
    61 of 85 Onthe Flip Side: Solar Heat Gain & Drying During the Day
  • 62.
    62 of 85 Onthe Flip Side: Solar Heat Gain & Drying Potential 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Aug 21 00:00 Aug 21 06:00 Aug 21 12:00 Aug 21 18:00 Aug 22 00:00 Temperature[°C] Temperatures - 3:12 and 6:12 Slope Roofs - Early Spring Conditions T-OUT-N-612-Shingle T-OUT-S-612-Shingle T-IN-N-612-Plywood T-IN-S-612-Plywood T-OUT-N-312-Shingle T-OUT-S-312-Shingle T-IN-N-312-Plywood T-IN-S-312-Plywood Outdoor - Dewpoint Outdoor - Temperature South Shingles 55°C North Shingles 35-40°C South Sheathing = 35°C North Sheathing = 31°C Ambient Air up to 21°C Lots of cloud cover changes the wetting and drying balance.
  • 63.
    63 of 85 ALocalized Problem... Seattle Portland Vancouver San Francisco Calgary High Risk Climate for Night Sky Radiation Attic Moisture Issues
  • 64.
    64 of 85 KeyFindings – The Cause of the Pacific Northwest Problems  Roof sheathing in well ventilated attics (also soffits, canopies) experiences elevated moisture levels in winter  Occurs despite elimination of typical wetting mechanisms within attics (air leakage, duct leakage, rain water leaks etc.)  Moisture level is above equilibrium level indicating additional wetting sources  Night sky cooling causes wetting when sheathing drops below ambient dewpoint (few hundred hours per year) in attic  Difficult to stop it from occurring  Fungal growth occurs due to elevated moisture content and condensation on underside of sheathing  More fungal growth on north than south – drying matters, the heat from a ceiling above a house will help too
  • 65.
    65 of 85 Monitoringof Potential Mitigation Strategies  Vented underlayment to de-couple night sky radiation cooling effects  Surface treatments to kill & prevent fungal growth
  • 66.
    66 of 85 VentedUnderlay - Night Sky Radiation De-Coupler?  Vented shingle underlay installed in one roof in 2nd year of study  Purpose: try to de-couple night sky cooling effects from sheathing
  • 67.
    67 of 85 VentedUnderlay – The Double Edged Sword South Orientation – Vented Underlay vs Direct Applied Shingles 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan 18 SolarRadiation(W/m2) Temperature(°C) T-OUT-S-VENT (Shingles) T-IN-S-VENT (Sheathing) T-OUT-S-312 (Shingles) T-IN-S-312 (Sheathing) Outdoor T T-Drainmat-S-VENT Solar Radiation Shingles – direct applied Shingles – vent mat 6°C drop in shingle 1°C drop in sheathing
  • 68.
    68 of 85 VentedUnderlay – The Double Edged Sword 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Day Night Avg Temperature(°C) MoistureContent(%) Spring VENT-N-MC VENT-S-MC 312-N-MC 312-S-MC VENT-N-T VENT-S-T 312-N-T 312-S-T North South North South Vent Normal Spring (March 1, 2013 to April 30, 2013) Diurnal Moisture Content (SURF) and Temperature Averages for North and South Oriented Vented and Control (Direct Applied Shingles) Roof Assemblies
  • 69.
    69 of 85 SurfaceTreatment Application – Round 1  4 huts x 2 orientations = 8 applications of each  Fungicides, Cleaners, Sealers › Boracol® 20-2 › Boracol® 20-2 BD › Bleach › Thompson’s WaterSeal® › Kilz® Paint  Wood Preservatives › Copper Naphthenate › Zinc Naphthenate
  • 70.
    70 of 85 WoodPreservative & Fungicide Surface Treatments When Applied 1 Year Later Fungal Growth observed is Cladosporium
  • 71.
    71 of 85 Northvs South Orientation South North
  • 72.
    72 of 85 VisualAssessment of Surface Treatment Efficacy VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF SURFACE TREATMENT EFFICACY Test Roof Surface Treatments (north left, south right) Sansin Boracol® 20-2 Copper Naphthenate Bleach Thompsons WaterSeal® Kilz®Paint Zinc Naphthenate Sansin Boracol® 20-2BD Control 3:12 4:12 6:12 VISUAL ASSESSMENT SCALE Pristine or very light fungal growth Moderate fungal growth Significant fungal growth In our experience Kilz® & Boracol® 20- 2BD while okay here after 2 years may not be best long term for fungal growth Need duplicate samples – slope not a big factor (heartwood vs sapwood is)
  • 73.
    73 of 85 WoodPreservative & Fungicide Surface Treatments The best decay fungicide looked okay in years 1 and 2 – but not in year 3
  • 74.
    74 of 85 ACaution with Surface Treatments
  • 75.
    75 of 85 ACaution with Surface Treatments
  • 76.
    76 of 85 ACaution with Surface Treatments
  • 77.
    77 of 85 Summary– Mitigation Strategy Performance  Thermally de-coupling the exposed shingles from the sheathing did not work well  Did not significantly increase sheathing temperature at night, but did reduce drying from solar heat gain  Surface treatments appear to be a potentially viable solution if right product is developed – currently available products not quite effective (nor developed specifically for this application)  Concurrent work by FP Innovations to perform accelerated testing of some new biocides/fungicides  Ongoing monitoring of huts to monitor long-term field performance of next generation treatments
  • 78.
    78 of 85 ConcurrentFungicide/Biocide Research – FP Innovations  Developed an accelerated 12 week test method to evaluate new fungicides applied to wood products  Have already tested a handful of newly innovated & proprietary fungicides & coatings  A few promising formulations completely prevented mold growth  Follow-up with field testing Images courtesy FP Innovations
  • 79.
    79 of 85 FieldTrials & Monitoring of 9 New Treatments – Round 2
  • 80.
    80 of 85 AdaptingSurface Treatments for Underside Application
  • 81.
    81 of 85 OngoingMonitoring of New Surface Treatments Most Promising fungicide/biocide is water repelling & contains several “active” ingredients to prevent long term mold growth. Note it is not a wood preservative it is a fungicide Currently undergoing environmental testing & available soon?
  • 82.
    82 of 85 RelativeRisk of Wood-Frame Roof Assemblies
  • 83.
    83 of 85 FinalThoughts  Ventilated attics & roof assemblies ‘built to code’ are experiencing mold growth on underside of sheathing (plywood or OSB)  Wetting from night sky condensation and may be exacerbated by air leaks & water leaks  Hard to reliably stop night sky condensation  Ventilation on its own is not a solution  Mold growth may be minor but perceived as risk  Could build other roof assemblies but unlikely to replace ventilated attics any time soon  Need to address durability & sensitivity of wood based sheathings to mold growth, various groups are developing products  Just make sure the fungicide is no more harmful to humans than the mold is…
  • 84.
    84 of 85 AdditionalResources RDH Technical Bulletin No. 10 - Mold in Vented Wood-Frame Roofs in the Coastal Pacific Northwest RDH Blog Article – Re-Thinking Ventilated Attics: How to Stop Mold Growth in Coastal Climates Why Wood Frame Attics Get Wet & Mouldy in the Pacific Northwest - Conference Paper at 30th RCI International Convention & Tradeshow Guide to Best Practices for Air Sealing and Insulation Retrofits - Produced by RDH and published by BC Housing
  • 85.
    85 of 85 FORFURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE VISIT  www.rdh.com and www.buildingsciencelabs.com  Lorne Ricketts - lricketts@rdh.com Discussion + Questions