Atomos, Aristotle and
Alchemy
(Chemistry Before
Modern History)
At the end of the lesson, the learners will be able to:
1.Discuss key developments in the concept of the atom
and element throughout pre-modern history
2. Discuss key developments in the practical
application of chemistry throughout pre-modern
history.
3. Articulate the contributions of alchemy as a
protoscience to chemistry.
Specific Learning Outcomes
a. I can describe the ideas of the
Ancient Greeks on the atom.
b. I can describe the ideas of the
Ancient Greeks on the elements.
c. I can describe the contributions
of the alchemists to the science of
chemistry.
a.Leucippus and Democritus
b.Jabir Ibn-Hayyan (Geber)
c.Atomism
d.Alchemy
e.Aristotle
f.Protoscience
Atomism, non-atomistic views of the
Greeks, the growth of alchemy across
different civilizations, Western
Alchemy
Greek philosophers
who began considering
the nature of what
things were made of.
preoccupied with how the universe
seemed to be both changing and
constant.
Leucippus and Democritus
were two of the most
important theorists about the
natural and physical world.
They were called physicists in
Ancient Greece. They
considered the idea of
atomism, or the idea that
things are made up of much
smaller things that cannot be
changed nor divided.
Among the features of their theory were the following:
• Atoms make up most of the things in the universe; where there are
no atoms, there is a void.
• Atoms are incredibly small and cannot be divided, hence atomos
(uncuttable).
• Atoms themselves are solid, homogeneous and cannot change.
• Atoms moving about and colliding in the void cause the changes we
see in our universe.
• The shapes, sizes and weights of individual atoms influence the
characteristics of the thing they make up; e.g. sharp atoms cause our
tongues to tear and make bitter or sour tastes, and atoms that
compose clay are joined by flexible joints which harden when the clay is
baked.
• Atomism, although more a
philosophical idea than a
scientific one was closest to our
current thinking about matter.
Despite having advocates,
atomism was set aside because
more prominent philosophers
opposed it. Religious groups later
declared it as heretical or
blasphemous because they
deemed atomistic thinking
denied the existence of God.
Atomism, although more a
philosophical idea than a scientific one
was closest to our current thinking
about matter. Despite having
advocates, atomism was set aside
because more prominent philosophers
opposed it. Religious groups later
declared it as heretical or blasphemous
because they deemed atomistic
thinking denied the existence of God.
Some of the ideas that served
as arguments against
atomism and what this
revealed about how the
Greeks thought about matter
and the world:
• The philosopher Anaxagoras
argued that there was an
infinite number of elementary
natural substances in the form
of infinitesimally small
particles that combined to
comprise the different things
in the universe.
• Another theory by a
philosopher named
Empedocles stated that
everything is made up of
four eternal and unchanging
kinds of matter, fire, air (all
gases), water (all liquids and
metals) and earth (all solids).
• The well-known philosopher Plato
further expanded Empedocles’
theory by saying each of the four
kinds of matter is composed of
geometrical solids (the “Platonic
solids”) further divisible into
triangles. When rearranged, these
triangles could cause the apparent
transformations between the four
basic kinds of matter.
Aristotle, on the other hand,
believed that the four elements
could be balanced in substances in
an infinite number of ways, and that
when combined gave proportions of
“essential qualities,” hot, dry, cold
and wet. Transformations between
the four elements (or changes in
their balance in a substance) caused
changes in the universe.
it was an obsession with
Aristotle’s ideas (and his
arguments against atomists)
that prevented atomism from
gaining ground.
Our concept of matter didn’t
advance much during this time,
the practical aspect of dealing
with substances, matter and
materials flourished in different
civilizations before and after the
Greeks:
• The Mesopotamians had
techniques to utilize metals
like gold and copper. They
even assigned certain
symbols to match metals with
the heavenly bodies such as
the Sun and Moon. They also
made use of other materials
such as dyes, glass, paints,
and perfumes.
• The Egyptians adapted
techniques from the
Mesopotamians and
perfected the use of
bronze, dye and glass that
the Greeks later copied.
• The Chinese also had their own
processes for metalwork and ceramic
materials, but they especially focused
on finding minerals, plants and
substances that could prolong life.
Some of the substances discovered in
Chinese medicine have been found to
have actual positive effects while
others were found useless or even
harmful, like mercury.
• The Indians, like the Chinese, had
a kind of alchemy (rasayana) that
looked at different substances and
practices for Vedic medicine. This is
tied closely to Hindu and Buddhist
beliefs. They also perfected the use
of iron and steel and were well-
known manufacturers of dyes, glass,
cement, solutions for textiles, and
soap.
The Arabs and Muslims enriched not
only the practice but also the
literature of chemistry. In particular,
the scholar Jabir Ibn-Hayyan, also
known as Geber, translated the
practices and Aristotelian thinking of
the Greeks and wrote extensively on
how metals can be purified. He
came up with the preparation of
acids such as nitric, hydrochloric and
sulfuric acids, as well as aqua regia
(nitro-hydrochloric acid).
Despite many of the progress being
practical, much of it was shrouded in
mysticism or cultural beliefs, and was often
a result of trial and error. These advances in
materials, metallurgy and medicine would
often be collectively referred to in history as
alchemy, from the Arabic/Greek alkīmiyā or
“the art of transmuting.”
The field of alchemy became popular in the Western world
because of Aristotle’s ideas on the elements and the
techniques developed by other civilizations. Alchemists tried
to play with the balance of the four elements (fire, water, air,
earth) and three principles (salt, sulfur and mercury) to
transform or transmute substances. Among their aims was
to try and transform “impure” or “base” metals like lead or
iron into the “purer” metals of silver or gold, discover a
magical “Philosopher’s Stone,” and produce the so-called
“Elixir of Life.” With a T-chart, distinguish how alchemy both
contributed to and hampered scientific thought.

atomism.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    At the endof the lesson, the learners will be able to: 1.Discuss key developments in the concept of the atom and element throughout pre-modern history 2. Discuss key developments in the practical application of chemistry throughout pre-modern history. 3. Articulate the contributions of alchemy as a protoscience to chemistry. Specific Learning Outcomes
  • 3.
    a. I candescribe the ideas of the Ancient Greeks on the atom. b. I can describe the ideas of the Ancient Greeks on the elements. c. I can describe the contributions of the alchemists to the science of chemistry.
  • 4.
    a.Leucippus and Democritus b.JabirIbn-Hayyan (Geber) c.Atomism d.Alchemy e.Aristotle f.Protoscience
  • 5.
    Atomism, non-atomistic viewsof the Greeks, the growth of alchemy across different civilizations, Western Alchemy
  • 6.
    Greek philosophers who beganconsidering the nature of what things were made of. preoccupied with how the universe seemed to be both changing and constant.
  • 7.
    Leucippus and Democritus weretwo of the most important theorists about the natural and physical world. They were called physicists in Ancient Greece. They considered the idea of atomism, or the idea that things are made up of much smaller things that cannot be changed nor divided.
  • 8.
    Among the featuresof their theory were the following: • Atoms make up most of the things in the universe; where there are no atoms, there is a void. • Atoms are incredibly small and cannot be divided, hence atomos (uncuttable). • Atoms themselves are solid, homogeneous and cannot change. • Atoms moving about and colliding in the void cause the changes we see in our universe. • The shapes, sizes and weights of individual atoms influence the characteristics of the thing they make up; e.g. sharp atoms cause our tongues to tear and make bitter or sour tastes, and atoms that compose clay are joined by flexible joints which harden when the clay is baked.
  • 9.
    • Atomism, althoughmore a philosophical idea than a scientific one was closest to our current thinking about matter. Despite having advocates, atomism was set aside because more prominent philosophers opposed it. Religious groups later declared it as heretical or blasphemous because they deemed atomistic thinking denied the existence of God.
  • 10.
    Atomism, although morea philosophical idea than a scientific one was closest to our current thinking about matter. Despite having advocates, atomism was set aside because more prominent philosophers opposed it. Religious groups later declared it as heretical or blasphemous because they deemed atomistic thinking denied the existence of God.
  • 11.
    Some of theideas that served as arguments against atomism and what this revealed about how the Greeks thought about matter and the world:
  • 12.
    • The philosopherAnaxagoras argued that there was an infinite number of elementary natural substances in the form of infinitesimally small particles that combined to comprise the different things in the universe.
  • 13.
    • Another theoryby a philosopher named Empedocles stated that everything is made up of four eternal and unchanging kinds of matter, fire, air (all gases), water (all liquids and metals) and earth (all solids).
  • 14.
    • The well-knownphilosopher Plato further expanded Empedocles’ theory by saying each of the four kinds of matter is composed of geometrical solids (the “Platonic solids”) further divisible into triangles. When rearranged, these triangles could cause the apparent transformations between the four basic kinds of matter.
  • 15.
    Aristotle, on theother hand, believed that the four elements could be balanced in substances in an infinite number of ways, and that when combined gave proportions of “essential qualities,” hot, dry, cold and wet. Transformations between the four elements (or changes in their balance in a substance) caused changes in the universe.
  • 16.
    it was anobsession with Aristotle’s ideas (and his arguments against atomists) that prevented atomism from gaining ground.
  • 17.
    Our concept ofmatter didn’t advance much during this time, the practical aspect of dealing with substances, matter and materials flourished in different civilizations before and after the Greeks:
  • 18.
    • The Mesopotamianshad techniques to utilize metals like gold and copper. They even assigned certain symbols to match metals with the heavenly bodies such as the Sun and Moon. They also made use of other materials such as dyes, glass, paints, and perfumes.
  • 19.
    • The Egyptiansadapted techniques from the Mesopotamians and perfected the use of bronze, dye and glass that the Greeks later copied.
  • 20.
    • The Chinesealso had their own processes for metalwork and ceramic materials, but they especially focused on finding minerals, plants and substances that could prolong life. Some of the substances discovered in Chinese medicine have been found to have actual positive effects while others were found useless or even harmful, like mercury.
  • 21.
    • The Indians,like the Chinese, had a kind of alchemy (rasayana) that looked at different substances and practices for Vedic medicine. This is tied closely to Hindu and Buddhist beliefs. They also perfected the use of iron and steel and were well- known manufacturers of dyes, glass, cement, solutions for textiles, and soap.
  • 22.
    The Arabs andMuslims enriched not only the practice but also the literature of chemistry. In particular, the scholar Jabir Ibn-Hayyan, also known as Geber, translated the practices and Aristotelian thinking of the Greeks and wrote extensively on how metals can be purified. He came up with the preparation of acids such as nitric, hydrochloric and sulfuric acids, as well as aqua regia (nitro-hydrochloric acid).
  • 23.
    Despite many ofthe progress being practical, much of it was shrouded in mysticism or cultural beliefs, and was often a result of trial and error. These advances in materials, metallurgy and medicine would often be collectively referred to in history as alchemy, from the Arabic/Greek alkīmiyā or “the art of transmuting.”
  • 24.
    The field ofalchemy became popular in the Western world because of Aristotle’s ideas on the elements and the techniques developed by other civilizations. Alchemists tried to play with the balance of the four elements (fire, water, air, earth) and three principles (salt, sulfur and mercury) to transform or transmute substances. Among their aims was to try and transform “impure” or “base” metals like lead or iron into the “purer” metals of silver or gold, discover a magical “Philosopher’s Stone,” and produce the so-called “Elixir of Life.” With a T-chart, distinguish how alchemy both contributed to and hampered scientific thought.