The document provides reviews of different music packaging designs, including both good and bad examples. A good CD digipak design had a clear track list, picture reflecting the genre, and professional framing. In contrast, a bad design had multiple font changes, too much clutter, and did not synergistically link elements. Similarly, a good music advertisement had an easily recognizable font, clear release date, and color matching the genre to provide insight, while a bad ad had inconsistent fonts, an unrecognizable artist, and failed to promote the brand or connect elements.

1. Assignment 32
Student Ancillary Peer Assessment

2. Good Digipak
8/10
Frames artist
Font ReflectsGenre
(Bold/easily
recognisable)
Track list clear with
suitable font
Picture reflects
genre
Looks professional
Good
framing
Gain insight into what
the song genre is,
obvious/clear All link synergistically
Strong colour scheme

3. Bad Digipak
3/10
UnprofessionalFont changes
Too much going on, needs more
sophistication
Not linked
synergistically
Genre is
hard to
recognise
No USP or recognisable
feature
Hard to read and
messy.Audience
will struggle to
have attention.

4. GoodAdvert
6/10
Clear font which is easily
recognisable
Date of release is
clear and
noticeable
Artist and song
name featured on
front
Album picture
featured to create
synergies
Magazine and
newspaper
rating
Could have featured
more songs to
create brand image
Font could be
tailored further
More info on artist
could be featured
Colour matches genre and
gives insight to song and
artist

5. BadAdvert
2/10
Looks very unprofessional, Photoshop is
poor and has no relevance to song No brand image
created and very
unrelated
Font constantly
changing and
has no
consistency
Artist name
isn’t forefront
and
recognisable
Hard to get
insight on
songs genre
and other
elements
Minimal brand promotion
and USP (Unconnected)