SUN Civil Society Network, profile picture
Uploaded bySUN Civil Society Network
231 views

Asia lr survey for sharing

This document provides a preliminary analysis of a survey conducted for the SUN Civil Society Learning Route program in Asia regarding civil society organizations' intervention strategies and learning needs related to nutrition. The analysis identifies each country's level of intervention (from no intervention to core intervention) in various areas like policy engagement, advocacy, communication, and multi-stakeholder platforms. It aims to understand current expertise and learning needs to help guide the Learning Route program and development of learning resources for civil society alliances.

Embed presentation

Download to read offline
Aug-16 Before looking at this preliminary analysis Content of this document: To understand which is the CSA intervention strategy related to the LR main learning areas, currently and on the mid term To find out what expertise we have "in-house" and which are the learning needs of our alliance Learning Needs priorities To fin out in the overall how much efforst and resources each Alliance is dedicating to the different macro areas Knowledge sharing To find out where the CSAs seek information for their planning and which institutions refer to the CSA to get information. Additional backgound information that will guide the LR and the M&E The information shared in this document is the result of a preliminary analysis of the Learning Route survey. The information collected will serve as baseline for the LR in asia and to guide the development of the learning program for the SUN Civil Society Alliances that applied for the Learning Route. For questions and clarifications, please write to the SUN CS Learning Route program coordinator: c.ruberto@savethechildren.org.uk Strategy Exertise and learning needs Ranking 2015 SUNCSN Annual Survey Time-$ alloacation
SUN Civil Society intervention in Asia Specific focus on Policy, Advocacy, communication, campaign, MSP, governance: results of the Learning Needs survey for the Learning Route Programme) Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Lao PDR Bangladesh Sri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Lao PDR Bangladesh Sri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Engagement in policy development/review National Policies tracking 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Sub-National Policies tracking 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Integration of nutrition in other sector policies (e.g. education; WASH) 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Engagement in national nutrition plan development 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention National Budget analysis 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention Sub-National Budget analysis 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention Data collection, sharing, analysis Nutrition status data collection at sub- national level 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention National or sub-national nutrition status data sharing 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention National or sub-national nutrition data review 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention Advocacy Advocacy: communities based intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Advocacy: intervention at sub-national level 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Advocacy: intervention at national level 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Advocacy: intervention at regional and/or international level 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: community based intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at sub-national level 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at national level 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at regional and/or international level 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Communication Communication: community based intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Communication: intervention at sub-national level 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Communication: intervention at national level 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Communication: intervention at regional and/or international level 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention Multi Stakeholder platforms Engage in International or Regional MSPs 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Engage in National MSPs 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Engage in sub-national MSPs 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Governance Leadership training for CSO and CSA 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention Fundraising 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Training of trainers 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention CSA monitoring evaluation and accountability 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Interventions related to rights and democracy participation 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Interventions related Women empowerment 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention Interventions related Youth empowerment 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention Strategy Current intervention Future intervention (within the next 5 years)
Matching Learning Priorities and SUN CS Expertise to offer Area Topic CSAs Learning Needs Ranking Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Lao PDR Bangladesh Sri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Advocacy Advocacy: intervention at national level 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes Yes Country Open-Ended Response Communication Communication: intervention at national level 8 Maybe Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Experiences and lessons learned on World breastfeeding week celebration at community level Multi Stakeholder platforms Engage in National MSPs 8 Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Experiences and lessons learned from the national nutrition day celebration Policy review Engagement in national nutrition plan development 8 Maybe Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes The advocacy of the Law on fortified flour is the expertise to share. The Law on mandatory fortification of flour was adopted by the Parliament in 2015, 92 from 96 deputies voted for the Law . The adoption of the Law was reached through informational campaign among the NGOs and social mobilization at the community level. The members of the CSA met the parliamentarians and informed them about importance of the mandatory flour fortification. In one year after adoption of the Law fortified flour has been available throughout the country from capital to district level. Governance Fundraising 8 Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes The next expertise to share is involving the parliamentarians in the Multistakeholder platform on nutrition. Their involvement resulted in improving of the accoutability of the state executive bodies on implementation of the nutrition policy, including the Law on Flour Fortifiction. The process of the involving of the deputies included seminars on nutrition, meetings, exchanging of documents, discussion of their participation in the Multi-stakeholder platform. Policy review National Policies tracking 7 Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes Lao PDR SUN information sharing Policy review Integration of nutrition in other sector policies (e.g. education; WASH) 7 Yes Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes Yes Role of the Civil Society Alliance for Scaling up Nutrition (CSA) for nutrition advocacy, especially for NPAN follow up and implementation Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at national level 7 Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes How the CSA can support to provide linkages for capacity building and coordination for multi-sectoral approaches to nutrition programming Communication Communication: community based intervention 7 Maybe Yes Yes No Yes Yes Maybe Yes Always proactively follow National Policies and Strategies to ensure uniformity in all interventions - which complements the national interventions. This would also build a strong platform to work well with the govt. and other key stakeholders. Multi Stakeholder platforms Engage in sub-national MSPs 7 Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Yes Maybe Yes Engage with the govt. and other stakeholders to a great extent. Work with the govt. to address key national issues as opposed to holding the state responsible at all times. Policy review Sub-National Policies tracking 6 Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Multi sectoral coordination for better nutrition Policy review National Budget analysis 6 Maybe No Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes engagement of media Advocacy Advocacy: communities based intervention 6 Yes No Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Yes Participation in MSP - shaping roles of CSA and other networks Advocacy Advocacy: intervention at sub-national level 6 Maybe Maybe Yes No Yes Yes Maybe Yes Advocacy to government re: BMS code monitoring, reporting, enforcement Advocacy Advocacy: intervention at regional and/or international level 6 Maybe No Yes No Maybe Yes Yes Yes Support provided for development of multi-sectoral nutrition strategies at national and provincial level. Communication Communication: intervention at sub- national level 6 Maybe Maybe Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes Advocacy for allocation of budgetary resources for nutrition Communication Communication: intervention at regional and/or international level 6 Maybe No Maybe Maybe Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Governance Leadership training for CSO and CSA 6 Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Yes Governance CSA monitoring evaluation and accountability 6 Maybe Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes Yes Yes Policy review Sub-National Budget analysis 5 Maybe No Yes No No No Maybe Yes Data collection, sharing, analysis National or sub-national nutrition data review 5 Maybe No Yes No Yes Yes Maybe Yes Governance Training of trainers 5 Maybe No Yes Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Governance Interventions related to rights and democracy participation 5 Maybe No No Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes Governance Interventions related Women empowerment 5 Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Data collection, sharing, analysis Nutrition status data collection at sub- national level 4 Maybe Maybe Yes No Yes No Maybe Yes Data collection, sharing, analysis National or sub-national nutrition status data sharing 4 Maybe No Yes No Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: community based intervention 4 Maybe No No Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at regional and/or international level 4 Maybe No No No Maybe Yes Yes Yes Governance Interventions related Youth empowerment 4 Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Yes No Yes Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at sub-national level 3 Maybe No No Maybe Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Multi Stakeholder platforms Engage in International or Regional MSPs 3 Maybe Maybe No Maybe Maybe Yes Yes Yes CSAs expertise to offer Myanmar Pakistan Expertise to offer/share/Best practice Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Bangladesh Sri Lanka Nepal
Learning Needs Ranking (counts of "high learning priority) Asia Africa Advocacy: intervention at national level 8 8 Communication: intervention at national level 8 5 Engage in National MSPs 8 5 Engagement in national nutrition plan development 8 7 Fundraising 8 11 National Policies tracking 7 8 Integration of nutrition in other sector policies (e.g. education; WASH) 7 7 Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at national level 7 6 Communication: community based intervention 7 8 Engage in sub-national MSPs 7 4 Sub-National Policies tracking 6 8 National Budget analysis 6 8 Advocacy: communities based intervention 6 9 Advocacy: intervention at sub-national level 6 8 Advocacy: intervention at regional and/or international level 6 6 Communication: intervention at sub-national level 6 7 Communication: intervention at regional and/or international level 6 5 Leadership training for CSO and CSA 6 9 CSA monitoring evaluation and accountability 6 9 Sub-National Budget analysis 5 5 National or sub-national nutrition data review 5 7 Training of trainers 5 8 Interventions related to rights and democracy participation 5 6 Interventions related Women empowerment 5 7 Nutrition status data collection at sub-national level 4 5 National or sub-national nutrition status data sharing 4 9 Campaign and social mobilization: community based intervention 4 8 Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at regional and/or international level 4 8 Interventions related Youth empowerment 4 4 Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at sub- national level 3 6 Engage in International or Regional MSPs 3 8
Estimated time and $ invested across the macro intervention areas Engagement in policy development/review Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 30 10 Cambodia 130 80 wrong Kyrgyzstan 30 10 Kyrgyzstan 100 100 ok Lao PDR 10 10 Lao PDR 100 100 ok Bangladesh 50 50 Bangladesh 190 310 wrong Sri Lanka 50 20 Sri Lanka 100 100 ok Nepal 50 20 Nepal 280 200 wrong Myanmar 20 10 Myanmar 110 100 wrong Pakistan 80 70 Pakistan 350 300 wrong Data collection/review/sharing Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 30 20 Kyrgyzstan 10 10 Lao PDR 10 10 Bangladesh 30 70 Sri Lanka 10 10 Nepal 40 50 Myanmar 10 Pakistan 50 50 Advocacy Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 30 30 Kyrgyzstan 20 50 Lao PDR 40 40 Bangladesh 30 70 Sri Lanka 10 50 Nepal 80 90 Myanmar 30 50 Pakistan 70 70 Engage in multi-stakeholders platforms Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 30 10 Kyrgyzstan 30 20 Lao PDR 30 30 Bangladesh 40 60 Sri Lanka 20 10 Nepal 90 20 Myanmar 40 30 Pakistan 80 60 CSA/CSO Good governance Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 10 10 Kyrgyzstan 10 10 Lao PDR 10 10 Bangladesh 40 60 Sri Lanka 10 10 Nepal 20 20 Myanmar 10 10 Pakistan 70 50 Each country should indicate percentace of time and $ invested, the overal amount should be 100. Some CSAs allocated time and $ incorrectly
When your CSA need information to guide action plan, strategy or decisions what sources do you use? Institutions Cambodia KyrgyzstanLao PDR BangladeshSri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Average SUN Civil Society Network 3 4 1 4 3 4 4 3 3 0-no information sharing SUN Secretariat Movement (UNDP based) 2 4 1 3 2 4 3 2 3 1-low information quality SUN Business Network 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2- sufficient information quality SUN CoP 2 and/or 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 3-good information quality Specific CSAs 2 0 0 1 3 4 2 2 2 4-high quality exchange of info Regional multi-stakeholders platforms 1 0 0 1 3 3 0 3 1 National multi-stakeholders platforms 2 3 1 3 3 4 4 3 3 Sub-national multi- stakeholders platforms 2 0 0 1 2 4 0 2 1 Governmental institutions 2 3 1 3 4 4 4 3 3 International organizations 2 4 1 3 4 4 4 3 3 Academies/Universities 1 4 0 3 3 4 0 3 2 Research organizations 1 4 0 3 3 4 0 3 2 Community focus groups 2 2 0 0 4 3 0 2 2 National Media 2 0 1 2 3 4 2 2 2 Private sector companies 1 1 0 0 2 3 0 2 1 CSOs 2 2 1 1 3 4 4 3 3 Other (please specify) donor networks Which sources most commonly request information from you and your CSA?  Which sources most commonly request information from you and your CSA? (max 5 answers) Institutions Cambodia KyrgyzstanLao PDR BangladeshSri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Average SUN Civil Society Network secretariat 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 0-no information sharing SUN Secretariat Movement (UNDP based) 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 2 2 1-not frequently SUN Business network 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2- ad hoc, sporadically SUN CoP 2 and/or 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3- frequently Specific CSAs 3 0 0 1 3 1 2 1 4- very frequently Regional multi-stakeholders platforms 1 0 0 1 3 0 2 1 National multi-stakeholders platforms 2 2 1 2 3 4 2 3 2 Sub-national multi- stakeholders platforms 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 Governmental organizations 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 International organizations 0 1 2 2 3 2 1 Academies/Universities 0 0 1 2 2 2 1 Research organizations 0 0 1 2 2 3 1 Community focus groups 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 National Media 2 1 2 3 4 3 3 2 Private sector companies 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 CSO 2 0 3 3 3 4 2 Other (please specify) Donor network 0
2015 SUNCSN Annual Survey Good governance elements Total CSAs Asian CSAs Constitution or ToR for the CSA? 78% 83% CSA Hosted by an NGO? 78% 83% CSA registered as an Independent Entity? 17% 17% Memorandum of Understanding between the CSA and host organization? 44% 17% Full-time CSA coordinator? 43% 67% ToR for the steering group or executive committee? 65% 83% Steering group or an executive committee? 78% 100% Do you have decentralized representation as a CSA (e.g at a district level)? 48% 33% Membership development strategy? 35% 17% Sustainability Plan? 22% 17% Conflict of interest policy? 22% 0% Membership application/screening process? 70% 83% Process for resolving conflict between members of the CSA? 30% 17% Process for nominating and facilitating equitable access to opportunities? 22% 17% CSA organisations internal registry 65% 50% Process for tracking of women’s participation in leadership of the CSA? 22% 17% Advocacy strategy Total CSAs Asian CSAs Does your CSA have its own advocacy, communications and/or social mobilization plan?52% 67% Contribution to a national advocacy and communications strategy aligned to the country plan, efforts and priorities86% 100% Regional advocacy initiatives 52% 17% International advocacy initiatives 43% 33% Increased resources for nutrition 90% 83% Do you have nutrition champions 48% 33% Advocacy Theme Improved budget tracking by government for nutrition 48% 17% Improved allocation of resources for nutrition 81% 67% Civil society financial contributions to the nutrition sector 43% 33% Breastmilk substitute marketing code 71% 67% Right to food and nutrition 71% 50% Food sovereignty 43% 17% Contribution to National Efforts National monitoring, evaluation and learning activities 67% 67% National nutrition plan development 76% 67% National nutrition information systems development 38% 33% 0% 0% Does your country have? 0% 0% A Nutrition Multi-sectoral Plan (NMP)? 86% 100% A Common Results Framework (CRF)? 57% 33% Themes Total CSAs Asian CSAs Agriculture 90% 100% Food Security 95% 100% Nutrition 95% 100% Education 90% 100% Health 95% 100% Social protection 81% 67% Water, sanitation and hygiene 86% 83% Right to food and nutrition 76% 33% Gender & Women's Empowerment 90% 100% Climate Change 43% 17% Support for exclusive breastfeeding up 90% 100% Micronutrient supplementation 76% 83% Fortification of foods 76% 67% Treatment of severe malnutrition 62% 50% Agriculture: Making nutritious food more accessible to everyone, and supporting small farms as a source of income for women and families81% 83% Education and Emplyment: Making sure children have the energy that they need to learn and earn sufficient income as adults52% 50% Clean Water and Sanitation: Improving access to reduce infection and disease 67% 67% Health Care: Improving access to services to ensure that women and children stay healthy81% 67% Support for Resilience: Establishing a stronger, healthier population and sustained prosperity to better endure emergencies and conflicts57% 50% Women’s Empowerment: Women empowered to be leaders in their families and communities, leading the way to a healthier and stronger world71% 67% Lao PDR Kyrgyz Republic The best practice to share is an advocating of amendments into the Law on Flour Fortification to implement mandatory flour fortification. Representatives from NGOs were trained on nutrition and flour fortification topics, printed materials were distributed. About 17 organisations took part in the advocacy work directly and they engaged their own partners in collecting signatures of people on community level, sent letters to parliamentarians. Members participated in TV talk shows, visited parliamentarians to inform them about importance of flour fortification. Pakistan Constant engagement with general members of CSA Engagement of media and other like minded coalitions in nutrition advocacy Cambodia In Cambodia, we found that since the Cambodia SUN CSA has been established in the last few months, the Civil Society has very stronger voice to advocate for nutrition related agenda with the government. In the past, individual NGO advocated for anything they wanted with government. Now, instead of individual NGO approaches to government for advocacy, we come as a team. This is more effective and makes the government listens to us well. Myanmar Coming together as an MSP has proven difficult in Myanmar, so the CSA has been actively working to increase opportunities for informal engagement and experience sharing with other networks. For example, we meet regularly with the UN Network in Yangon and have begun to schedule meetings with representatives of donor agencies in order to strengthen the Donor Network. We have also created an email list in order to facilitate regular communication with the MSP. Nepal The national alliance and formation of district chapters to bridge between community and national level. A lobby team within CSAN with experts. Regular coordination with government to recognize the advocacy issues Media engagement is the best means for highlighting the issue in general public and among policy makers. Signatory commitment collection is found effective to generate ownership on issue. Real case collection and video show are found as best means as advocacy tools Regular meetings and sharing of information among CSOs Learning needs (“Priorities for support”) Knowledge and IEC material collection, dissemination and sharing. Grants management (e.g. SUN CSA provides small grants to local civil society from larger INGOs members) Kyrgyz Republic Development of MSP ; Flour fortification ; Development of CSA ; Budget analysis. Pakistan Additional Resources for Nutrition Implementation of Multi-sectoral Plans Myanmar Develop effective advocacy plan Nepal Identifying additional funding opportunities. The donor convener has not been active in the MSP and the CSA is currently seeking continued funding to cover program costs. Best practices Lao PDR Cambodia SUN CSA Laos has only been fully operational late 2014, thus we do not have a lot of lessons or best practices to share. However, we could share our experiences we had on building momentum from members and government counterparts. How we were able to increase our members, commitment from our management committee as well as gain acceptance from the government to be involved in many health and nutrition related discussions, events and meetings.

More Related Content

PPTX
Learning Route: learning needs/expertise survey - draft analysis
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Rwanda stakeholder & action mapping 2014 15
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Advancing Partners and Communities project: An overview
byJSI
 
PDF
Analysing Oxfam Viet Nam’s Participatory Poverty Mapping Analysis project usi...
bySanjan Haque
 
PPT
Changing The Big Picture Presentation Tessy 1 27 09 V2
byremoved_62798267384a091db5c693ad7f1cc5ac
 
PDF
Ccih2019 pepfar-hillis-key-messages
byChristian Connections for International Health
 
PPTX
The JSR Experience and Scaling Up in East and Central Africa
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
PPT
POLICY DIALOGUE EXPERIENCE FROM FANRPAN, Uganda June 2015
byAFAAS
 
Learning Route: learning needs/expertise survey - draft analysis
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Rwanda stakeholder & action mapping 2014 15
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Advancing Partners and Communities project: An overview
byJSI
 
Analysing Oxfam Viet Nam’s Participatory Poverty Mapping Analysis project usi...
bySanjan Haque
 
Changing The Big Picture Presentation Tessy 1 27 09 V2
byremoved_62798267384a091db5c693ad7f1cc5ac
 
Ccih2019 pepfar-hillis-key-messages
byChristian Connections for International Health
 
The JSR Experience and Scaling Up in East and Central Africa
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
POLICY DIALOGUE EXPERIENCE FROM FANRPAN, Uganda June 2015
byAFAAS
 

What's hot

PPTX
AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AND RAS POLICIES REVIEW
byAFAAS
 
PPTX
EXTENSION POLICY: LESSONS FROM MEAS EXPERIENCE
byAFAAS
 
PDF
Sector planning-strategies-and-their-implementation-water for all
byAicha Chorak Franky
 
PPTX
2015 ReSAKSS Conference – Day 3- Paul Guthiga
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
PPTX
2015 ReSAKSS Conference – Day 3- Paul Guthiga
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
PDF
Public Participation - Lorena RIVERO DEL PASO, Mexico
byOECD Governance
 
PDF
Illustration of a proposed ReSAKSS-Asia website tool
byInternational Food Policy Research Institute
 
PDF
Monitoring MDGs and influencing policy – practical approaches and experience ...
byInternational Food Policy Research Institute
 
PPTX
AIDSTAR-One Field Support Workplan FY 2011
byJoke Hoogerbrugge
 
PDF
State of capacities and needs for greater evidence-based policy making in dev...
byInternational Food Policy Research Institute
 
PPT
Annie Parsons - Centre for Research on HIV and AIDS, University of the Wester...
byRegional AIDS Training Network
 
PPTX
Top Ideas for Health Systems and Access
byCopenhagen_Consensus
 
PPTX
2015 ReSAKSS Conference – Day 3 - Godfrey Bahiigwa
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
PDF
The Governance of Inclusive Growth - OECD
byOECD Governance
 
PDF
What is Joint Learning?
byHFG Project
 
PPTX
NAIPs Appraisal and Design: Status and Progress of IFPRI/ReSAKSS Support to C...
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
PDF
Transforming health systems country case study briefs
byThe Rockefeller Foundation
 
PPT
Documenting Sexual and Reproductive Health Best Practices in SADC
byRouzeh Eghtessadi
 
PPTX
Country strategy+governance
bybpm_729
 
PPTX
4 nancy johnson-gap-webinar1-4oct2016
byGlobal Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR)
 
AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AND RAS POLICIES REVIEW
byAFAAS
 
EXTENSION POLICY: LESSONS FROM MEAS EXPERIENCE
byAFAAS
 
Sector planning-strategies-and-their-implementation-water for all
byAicha Chorak Franky
 
2015 ReSAKSS Conference – Day 3- Paul Guthiga
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
2015 ReSAKSS Conference – Day 3- Paul Guthiga
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
Public Participation - Lorena RIVERO DEL PASO, Mexico
byOECD Governance
 
Illustration of a proposed ReSAKSS-Asia website tool
byInternational Food Policy Research Institute
 
Monitoring MDGs and influencing policy – practical approaches and experience ...
byInternational Food Policy Research Institute
 
AIDSTAR-One Field Support Workplan FY 2011
byJoke Hoogerbrugge
 
State of capacities and needs for greater evidence-based policy making in dev...
byInternational Food Policy Research Institute
 
Annie Parsons - Centre for Research on HIV and AIDS, University of the Wester...
byRegional AIDS Training Network
 
Top Ideas for Health Systems and Access
byCopenhagen_Consensus
 
2015 ReSAKSS Conference – Day 3 - Godfrey Bahiigwa
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
The Governance of Inclusive Growth - OECD
byOECD Governance
 
What is Joint Learning?
byHFG Project
 
NAIPs Appraisal and Design: Status and Progress of IFPRI/ReSAKSS Support to C...
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
Transforming health systems country case study briefs
byThe Rockefeller Foundation
 
Documenting Sexual and Reproductive Health Best Practices in SADC
byRouzeh Eghtessadi
 
Country strategy+governance
bybpm_729
 
4 nancy johnson-gap-webinar1-4oct2016
byGlobal Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR)
 

Viewers also liked

PDF
Testes unitários como ferramentas de design de código
byPaula Grangeiro
 
PPTX
Europe changes the world magazine assignment
byHeatherP
 
PPT
TO Mentor Training
byjanestrohm
 
PDF
THE COTTON ROAD - FOLDER
byDanielle Domingues
 
PDF
Portfolio Samples
byjxrichardso1
 
PPTX
2016 West Region Accounting Meeting
byTayah Lin Butler, MBA
 
PDF
Неслышащий да увидит
byMoscow Digital
 
PDF
Lantana Reserve
bymike_walker
 
DOCX
Project Experience3
byajith k
 
PPTX
Stratégie Responsabilité Sociétale des Entreprises (RSE) et marchés publics
byFrédéric Grevey
 
PPTX
數位廣告媒體企劃與配置Part 1
byMinMax Digital Consulting 關鍵數位行銷
 
PDF
La responsabilité sociale et environnementale des entreprises
byInstitut de recherche sur la Résolution Non-violente des Conflits
 
PPT
Eurpean Exploration And Empire Building
byHeatherP
 
PPT
Literacy rate and culture no whatch saying
bymarypardee
 
PDF
【MMdc 分享】消費行為分析_SmartM 電子商務行銷X開店菁英班
by關鍵數位行銷股份有限公司 Minmax Digital Consulting
 
PPTX
Office365 groups from the ground up - SPTechCon Boston
byDrew Madelung
 
PPTX
Projet pilote office 365
byOdile Dupont
 
PPTX
How to conduct an anti-money laundering (AML) system assessment
byKeith Furst
 
PDF
UDP Report
byJames Dianics
 
PDF
Esprit et Conscience (French)
byHitoshi Tsuchiyama
 
Testes unitários como ferramentas de design de código
byPaula Grangeiro
 
Europe changes the world magazine assignment
byHeatherP
 
TO Mentor Training
byjanestrohm
 
THE COTTON ROAD - FOLDER
byDanielle Domingues
 
Portfolio Samples
byjxrichardso1
 
2016 West Region Accounting Meeting
byTayah Lin Butler, MBA
 
Неслышащий да увидит
byMoscow Digital
 
Lantana Reserve
bymike_walker
 
Project Experience3
byajith k
 
Stratégie Responsabilité Sociétale des Entreprises (RSE) et marchés publics
byFrédéric Grevey
 
數位廣告媒體企劃與配置Part 1
byMinMax Digital Consulting 關鍵數位行銷
 
La responsabilité sociale et environnementale des entreprises
byInstitut de recherche sur la Résolution Non-violente des Conflits
 
Eurpean Exploration And Empire Building
byHeatherP
 
Literacy rate and culture no whatch saying
bymarypardee
 
【MMdc 分享】消費行為分析_SmartM 電子商務行銷X開店菁英班
by關鍵數位行銷股份有限公司 Minmax Digital Consulting
 
Office365 groups from the ground up - SPTechCon Boston
byDrew Madelung
 
Projet pilote office 365
byOdile Dupont
 
How to conduct an anti-money laundering (AML) system assessment
byKeith Furst
 
UDP Report
byJames Dianics
 
Esprit et Conscience (French)
byHitoshi Tsuchiyama
 

Similar to Asia lr survey for sharing

PPT
SUN CSN - Learning Route Start-up meeting 2016 -7. lr sun 2014
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPTX
Learning Route Rwanda - participants feedback
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPT
4. lr for sun csn webinar asia june2016_gp
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPTX
SUN CSN - Learning Route Start-up meeting 2016 -5. learning route grant coord...
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPTX
2015 ReSAKSS Conference – Day 1 - Michael Johnson
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
PPTX
More examples of social accountability efforts in sun countries 25.08.16
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
DOC
Learning Route start up meeting - briefing document - 7. 2015 survey response...
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPTX
Data compilation during the intermediate phase in preparation for the next wo...
byTransformNutritionWe
 
PPTX
3. learning route program overview
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPTX
SUN LR Rwanda - Program objectives
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPTX
SUN CSN - Learning Route Start-up meeting 2016 -3. learning routes background
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPTX
SUN CSN - Learning Route Start-up meeting 2016 -8. design and systematization
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPTX
2. learning routes background
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
A territorial approach to food security
byOECDregions
 
PPTX
E learning africa version 23.05.2013
byMehmet Korkmaz
 
PPTX
Learning Route Rwanda Draft Innovation plan Kenya
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
SUN Civil Society Learning Route in Rwanda Background report
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
INFORMATIZATION LEVEL ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK AND EDUCATIONAL POLICY IMPLICATIONS
byijmpict
 
PDF
INFORMATIZATION LEVEL ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK AND EDUCATIONAL POLICY IMPLICATIONS
byijmpict
 
PDF
Design and implementation of food security strategies in Cambodia
byInternational Food Policy Research Institute
 
SUN CSN - Learning Route Start-up meeting 2016 -7. lr sun 2014
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Learning Route Rwanda - participants feedback
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
4. lr for sun csn webinar asia june2016_gp
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
SUN CSN - Learning Route Start-up meeting 2016 -5. learning route grant coord...
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
2015 ReSAKSS Conference – Day 1 - Michael Johnson
byAfrican Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
 
More examples of social accountability efforts in sun countries 25.08.16
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Learning Route start up meeting - briefing document - 7. 2015 survey response...
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Data compilation during the intermediate phase in preparation for the next wo...
byTransformNutritionWe
 
3. learning route program overview
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
SUN LR Rwanda - Program objectives
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
SUN CSN - Learning Route Start-up meeting 2016 -3. learning routes background
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
SUN CSN - Learning Route Start-up meeting 2016 -8. design and systematization
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
2. learning routes background
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
A territorial approach to food security
byOECDregions
 
E learning africa version 23.05.2013
byMehmet Korkmaz
 
Learning Route Rwanda Draft Innovation plan Kenya
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
SUN Civil Society Learning Route in Rwanda Background report
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
INFORMATIZATION LEVEL ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK AND EDUCATIONAL POLICY IMPLICATIONS
byijmpict
 
INFORMATIZATION LEVEL ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK AND EDUCATIONAL POLICY IMPLICATIONS
byijmpict
 
Design and implementation of food security strategies in Cambodia
byInternational Food Policy Research Institute
 

More from SUN Civil Society Network

PPTX
Presentation: MEAL for nutrition advocacy
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
MEAL Nutrition Advocacy - tips for CSAs
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
SUNCSN 2019 Impact Pitch
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Sun civil society network 2019 awards
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Final world food day statement english
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Signed asia csn resolution final
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
CSAs Achievements by SUN CSN Theory of Change in 2017
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Panita innovation plan presentation
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Cso stakeholder mapping guideline.ppt
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Budget advocacy
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Presentation eat what you grow
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
New Guidance on inappropriate Promotion of Foods for infants and young Childr...
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Stakeholder mapping lr part 1
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Stakeholder mapping lr part 2
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Nutr3 y obesidad
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
El Salvador Propuesta Nutricion
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
Boletín de presentación de propuesta
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PPTX
Colombia Nutrition actualizaciones
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
ECSC-SUN newsletter January 2017
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
PDF
ASC SUN El Salvadore Actualizaciones Nu3
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Presentation: MEAL for nutrition advocacy
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
MEAL Nutrition Advocacy - tips for CSAs
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
SUNCSN 2019 Impact Pitch
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Sun civil society network 2019 awards
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Final world food day statement english
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Signed asia csn resolution final
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
CSAs Achievements by SUN CSN Theory of Change in 2017
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Panita innovation plan presentation
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Cso stakeholder mapping guideline.ppt
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Budget advocacy
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Presentation eat what you grow
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
New Guidance on inappropriate Promotion of Foods for infants and young Childr...
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Stakeholder mapping lr part 1
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Stakeholder mapping lr part 2
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Nutr3 y obesidad
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
El Salvador Propuesta Nutricion
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Boletín de presentación de propuesta
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
Colombia Nutrition actualizaciones
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
ECSC-SUN newsletter January 2017
bySUN Civil Society Network
 
ASC SUN El Salvadore Actualizaciones Nu3
bySUN Civil Society Network
 

Recently uploaded

PPTX
Devolution-of-functions-Internatiobest-practices-March-2024-Tinashe-Chigwata....
byandrewcmwale10
 
PDF
PPT Item # 11 - NOI 6801, 6900, 7000, 7101 Broadway
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
EFOW Brief: Essay on Leadership Paradigms, Scenarios and Pathways
byEnergy for One World
 
PDF
Item # 7 - Water & Wastewater Rate Study
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
PPT Item # 7 - Water & Wastewater Rate Study
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
PPT Item # 5 -- PPT 4820 Broadway Street
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
PPT Item # 3 -- Announcements Powerpoint
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
The Economic Outlook for 2026 to 2036 in 17 Slides
byCongressional Budget Office
 
PDF
PPT Item # 10 - May General Election Order & Designation
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
MSC 2026 : Under Destruction Munich Security Report 2026
byEnergy for One World
 
PDF
PPT Item # 12 - 2025 Racial Profiling Report
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
Item # 12 - 2025 Racial Profiling Report
byahcitycouncil
 
PPTX
Ending Homelessness through Community Unity with Arvy Ebrahime
byArvy Ebrahime
 
PDF
EFOW Brief: Some Stories of Two- Choices we are invited to make
byEnergy for One World
 
PDF
Rapport du Congrès de novembre 2025 sur l'enrichissement personnel de Trump
bySociété Tripalio
 
PDF
Item # 2a - January 12, 2026 CCM Minutes
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
Item # 9 - Legal Services Contract/Renewal
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
PPT Item # 6 - PPT 518 Austin Highway final review
byahcitycouncil
 
PDF
The Budget and Economic Outlook for 2026 to 2036: Press Briefing Slides
byCongressional Budget Office
 
PPTX
Mengapresiasi dan Mengkreasikan Cerpen.pptx
byDyah713783
 
Devolution-of-functions-Internatiobest-practices-March-2024-Tinashe-Chigwata....
byandrewcmwale10
 
PPT Item # 11 - NOI 6801, 6900, 7000, 7101 Broadway
byahcitycouncil
 
EFOW Brief: Essay on Leadership Paradigms, Scenarios and Pathways
byEnergy for One World
 
Item # 7 - Water & Wastewater Rate Study
byahcitycouncil
 
PPT Item # 7 - Water & Wastewater Rate Study
byahcitycouncil
 
PPT Item # 5 -- PPT 4820 Broadway Street
byahcitycouncil
 
PPT Item # 3 -- Announcements Powerpoint
byahcitycouncil
 
The Economic Outlook for 2026 to 2036 in 17 Slides
byCongressional Budget Office
 
PPT Item # 10 - May General Election Order & Designation
byahcitycouncil
 
MSC 2026 : Under Destruction Munich Security Report 2026
byEnergy for One World
 
PPT Item # 12 - 2025 Racial Profiling Report
byahcitycouncil
 
Item # 12 - 2025 Racial Profiling Report
byahcitycouncil
 
Ending Homelessness through Community Unity with Arvy Ebrahime
byArvy Ebrahime
 
EFOW Brief: Some Stories of Two- Choices we are invited to make
byEnergy for One World
 
Rapport du Congrès de novembre 2025 sur l'enrichissement personnel de Trump
bySociété Tripalio
 
Item # 2a - January 12, 2026 CCM Minutes
byahcitycouncil
 
Item # 9 - Legal Services Contract/Renewal
byahcitycouncil
 
PPT Item # 6 - PPT 518 Austin Highway final review
byahcitycouncil
 
The Budget and Economic Outlook for 2026 to 2036: Press Briefing Slides
byCongressional Budget Office
 
Mengapresiasi dan Mengkreasikan Cerpen.pptx
byDyah713783
 

Asia lr survey for sharing

  • 1.
    Aug-16 Before looking atthis preliminary analysis Content of this document: To understand which is the CSA intervention strategy related to the LR main learning areas, currently and on the mid term To find out what expertise we have "in-house" and which are the learning needs of our alliance Learning Needs priorities To fin out in the overall how much efforst and resources each Alliance is dedicating to the different macro areas Knowledge sharing To find out where the CSAs seek information for their planning and which institutions refer to the CSA to get information. Additional backgound information that will guide the LR and the M&E The information shared in this document is the result of a preliminary analysis of the Learning Route survey. The information collected will serve as baseline for the LR in asia and to guide the development of the learning program for the SUN Civil Society Alliances that applied for the Learning Route. For questions and clarifications, please write to the SUN CS Learning Route program coordinator: c.ruberto@savethechildren.org.uk Strategy Exertise and learning needs Ranking 2015 SUNCSN Annual Survey Time-$ alloacation
  • 2.
    SUN Civil Societyintervention in Asia Specific focus on Policy, Advocacy, communication, campaign, MSP, governance: results of the Learning Needs survey for the Learning Route Programme) Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Lao PDR Bangladesh Sri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Lao PDR Bangladesh Sri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Engagement in policy development/review National Policies tracking 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Sub-National Policies tracking 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Integration of nutrition in other sector policies (e.g. education; WASH) 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Engagement in national nutrition plan development 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention National Budget analysis 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention Sub-National Budget analysis 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention Data collection, sharing, analysis Nutrition status data collection at sub- national level 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention National or sub-national nutrition status data sharing 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention National or sub-national nutrition data review 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention Advocacy Advocacy: communities based intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Advocacy: intervention at sub-national level 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Advocacy: intervention at national level 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Advocacy: intervention at regional and/or international level 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: community based intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at sub-national level 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at national level 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at regional and/or international level 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Communication Communication: community based intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Communication: intervention at sub-national level 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Communication: intervention at national level 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Communication: intervention at regional and/or international level 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention Multi Stakeholder platforms Engage in International or Regional MSPs 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Engage in National MSPs 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention Engage in sub-national MSPs 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Governance Leadership training for CSO and CSA 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention Fundraising 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Training of trainers 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention CSA monitoring evaluation and accountability 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention Interventions related to rights and democracy participation 3-LITTLE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention Interventions related Women empowerment 2-Intervention 4-NO intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 2-Intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention Interventions related Youth empowerment 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 4-NO intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 1-CORE intervention 4-NO intervention 4-NO intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention 1-CORE intervention 1-CORE intervention 3-LITTLE intervention 2-Intervention Strategy Current intervention Future intervention (within the next 5 years)
  • 3.
    Matching Learning Prioritiesand SUN CS Expertise to offer Area Topic CSAs Learning Needs Ranking Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Lao PDR Bangladesh Sri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Advocacy Advocacy: intervention at national level 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes Yes Country Open-Ended Response Communication Communication: intervention at national level 8 Maybe Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Experiences and lessons learned on World breastfeeding week celebration at community level Multi Stakeholder platforms Engage in National MSPs 8 Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Experiences and lessons learned from the national nutrition day celebration Policy review Engagement in national nutrition plan development 8 Maybe Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes The advocacy of the Law on fortified flour is the expertise to share. The Law on mandatory fortification of flour was adopted by the Parliament in 2015, 92 from 96 deputies voted for the Law . The adoption of the Law was reached through informational campaign among the NGOs and social mobilization at the community level. The members of the CSA met the parliamentarians and informed them about importance of the mandatory flour fortification. In one year after adoption of the Law fortified flour has been available throughout the country from capital to district level. Governance Fundraising 8 Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes The next expertise to share is involving the parliamentarians in the Multistakeholder platform on nutrition. Their involvement resulted in improving of the accoutability of the state executive bodies on implementation of the nutrition policy, including the Law on Flour Fortifiction. The process of the involving of the deputies included seminars on nutrition, meetings, exchanging of documents, discussion of their participation in the Multi-stakeholder platform. Policy review National Policies tracking 7 Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes Lao PDR SUN information sharing Policy review Integration of nutrition in other sector policies (e.g. education; WASH) 7 Yes Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes Yes Role of the Civil Society Alliance for Scaling up Nutrition (CSA) for nutrition advocacy, especially for NPAN follow up and implementation Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at national level 7 Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes Yes Yes Yes How the CSA can support to provide linkages for capacity building and coordination for multi-sectoral approaches to nutrition programming Communication Communication: community based intervention 7 Maybe Yes Yes No Yes Yes Maybe Yes Always proactively follow National Policies and Strategies to ensure uniformity in all interventions - which complements the national interventions. This would also build a strong platform to work well with the govt. and other key stakeholders. Multi Stakeholder platforms Engage in sub-national MSPs 7 Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Yes Maybe Yes Engage with the govt. and other stakeholders to a great extent. Work with the govt. to address key national issues as opposed to holding the state responsible at all times. Policy review Sub-National Policies tracking 6 Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Multi sectoral coordination for better nutrition Policy review National Budget analysis 6 Maybe No Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes engagement of media Advocacy Advocacy: communities based intervention 6 Yes No Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Yes Participation in MSP - shaping roles of CSA and other networks Advocacy Advocacy: intervention at sub-national level 6 Maybe Maybe Yes No Yes Yes Maybe Yes Advocacy to government re: BMS code monitoring, reporting, enforcement Advocacy Advocacy: intervention at regional and/or international level 6 Maybe No Yes No Maybe Yes Yes Yes Support provided for development of multi-sectoral nutrition strategies at national and provincial level. Communication Communication: intervention at sub- national level 6 Maybe Maybe Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes Advocacy for allocation of budgetary resources for nutrition Communication Communication: intervention at regional and/or international level 6 Maybe No Maybe Maybe Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Governance Leadership training for CSO and CSA 6 Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Yes Governance CSA monitoring evaluation and accountability 6 Maybe Maybe Yes No Maybe Yes Yes Yes Policy review Sub-National Budget analysis 5 Maybe No Yes No No No Maybe Yes Data collection, sharing, analysis National or sub-national nutrition data review 5 Maybe No Yes No Yes Yes Maybe Yes Governance Training of trainers 5 Maybe No Yes Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Governance Interventions related to rights and democracy participation 5 Maybe No No Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes Governance Interventions related Women empowerment 5 Maybe No Yes Maybe Yes Yes Maybe Yes Data collection, sharing, analysis Nutrition status data collection at sub- national level 4 Maybe Maybe Yes No Yes No Maybe Yes Data collection, sharing, analysis National or sub-national nutrition status data sharing 4 Maybe No Yes No Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: community based intervention 4 Maybe No No Maybe No Yes Yes Yes Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at regional and/or international level 4 Maybe No No No Maybe Yes Yes Yes Governance Interventions related Youth empowerment 4 Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Maybe Yes No Yes Campaign and social mobilization Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at sub-national level 3 Maybe No No Maybe Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Multi Stakeholder platforms Engage in International or Regional MSPs 3 Maybe Maybe No Maybe Maybe Yes Yes Yes CSAs expertise to offer Myanmar Pakistan Expertise to offer/share/Best practice Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Bangladesh Sri Lanka Nepal
  • 4.
    Learning Needs Ranking(counts of "high learning priority) Asia Africa Advocacy: intervention at national level 8 8 Communication: intervention at national level 8 5 Engage in National MSPs 8 5 Engagement in national nutrition plan development 8 7 Fundraising 8 11 National Policies tracking 7 8 Integration of nutrition in other sector policies (e.g. education; WASH) 7 7 Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at national level 7 6 Communication: community based intervention 7 8 Engage in sub-national MSPs 7 4 Sub-National Policies tracking 6 8 National Budget analysis 6 8 Advocacy: communities based intervention 6 9 Advocacy: intervention at sub-national level 6 8 Advocacy: intervention at regional and/or international level 6 6 Communication: intervention at sub-national level 6 7 Communication: intervention at regional and/or international level 6 5 Leadership training for CSO and CSA 6 9 CSA monitoring evaluation and accountability 6 9 Sub-National Budget analysis 5 5 National or sub-national nutrition data review 5 7 Training of trainers 5 8 Interventions related to rights and democracy participation 5 6 Interventions related Women empowerment 5 7 Nutrition status data collection at sub-national level 4 5 National or sub-national nutrition status data sharing 4 9 Campaign and social mobilization: community based intervention 4 8 Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at regional and/or international level 4 8 Interventions related Youth empowerment 4 4 Campaign and social mobilization: intervention at sub- national level 3 6 Engage in International or Regional MSPs 3 8
  • 5.
    Estimated time and$ invested across the macro intervention areas Engagement in policy development/review Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 30 10 Cambodia 130 80 wrong Kyrgyzstan 30 10 Kyrgyzstan 100 100 ok Lao PDR 10 10 Lao PDR 100 100 ok Bangladesh 50 50 Bangladesh 190 310 wrong Sri Lanka 50 20 Sri Lanka 100 100 ok Nepal 50 20 Nepal 280 200 wrong Myanmar 20 10 Myanmar 110 100 wrong Pakistan 80 70 Pakistan 350 300 wrong Data collection/review/sharing Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 30 20 Kyrgyzstan 10 10 Lao PDR 10 10 Bangladesh 30 70 Sri Lanka 10 10 Nepal 40 50 Myanmar 10 Pakistan 50 50 Advocacy Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 30 30 Kyrgyzstan 20 50 Lao PDR 40 40 Bangladesh 30 70 Sri Lanka 10 50 Nepal 80 90 Myanmar 30 50 Pakistan 70 70 Engage in multi-stakeholders platforms Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 30 10 Kyrgyzstan 30 20 Lao PDR 30 30 Bangladesh 40 60 Sri Lanka 20 10 Nepal 90 20 Myanmar 40 30 Pakistan 80 60 CSA/CSO Good governance Estimated time invested (%) Estimated $ invested (% overall CSA budget) Cambodia 10 10 Kyrgyzstan 10 10 Lao PDR 10 10 Bangladesh 40 60 Sri Lanka 10 10 Nepal 20 20 Myanmar 10 10 Pakistan 70 50 Each country should indicate percentace of time and $ invested, the overal amount should be 100. Some CSAs allocated time and $ incorrectly
  • 6.
    When your CSA needinformation to guide action plan, strategy or decisions what sources do you use? Institutions Cambodia KyrgyzstanLao PDR BangladeshSri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Average SUN Civil Society Network 3 4 1 4 3 4 4 3 3 0-no information sharing SUN Secretariat Movement (UNDP based) 2 4 1 3 2 4 3 2 3 1-low information quality SUN Business Network 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2- sufficient information quality SUN CoP 2 and/or 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 3-good information quality Specific CSAs 2 0 0 1 3 4 2 2 2 4-high quality exchange of info Regional multi-stakeholders platforms 1 0 0 1 3 3 0 3 1 National multi-stakeholders platforms 2 3 1 3 3 4 4 3 3 Sub-national multi- stakeholders platforms 2 0 0 1 2 4 0 2 1 Governmental institutions 2 3 1 3 4 4 4 3 3 International organizations 2 4 1 3 4 4 4 3 3 Academies/Universities 1 4 0 3 3 4 0 3 2 Research organizations 1 4 0 3 3 4 0 3 2 Community focus groups 2 2 0 0 4 3 0 2 2 National Media 2 0 1 2 3 4 2 2 2 Private sector companies 1 1 0 0 2 3 0 2 1 CSOs 2 2 1 1 3 4 4 3 3 Other (please specify) donor networks Which sources most commonly request information from you and your CSA?  Which sources most commonly request information from you and your CSA? (max 5 answers) Institutions Cambodia KyrgyzstanLao PDR BangladeshSri Lanka Nepal Myanmar Pakistan Average SUN Civil Society Network secretariat 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 0-no information sharing SUN Secretariat Movement (UNDP based) 1 2 1 1 0 3 2 2 2 1-not frequently SUN Business network 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2- ad hoc, sporadically SUN CoP 2 and/or 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3- frequently Specific CSAs 3 0 0 1 3 1 2 1 4- very frequently Regional multi-stakeholders platforms 1 0 0 1 3 0 2 1 National multi-stakeholders platforms 2 2 1 2 3 4 2 3 2 Sub-national multi- stakeholders platforms 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 Governmental organizations 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 International organizations 0 1 2 2 3 2 1 Academies/Universities 0 0 1 2 2 2 1 Research organizations 0 0 1 2 2 3 1 Community focus groups 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 National Media 2 1 2 3 4 3 3 2 Private sector companies 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 CSO 2 0 3 3 3 4 2 Other (please specify) Donor network 0
  • 7.
    2015 SUNCSN AnnualSurvey Good governance elements Total CSAs Asian CSAs Constitution or ToR for the CSA? 78% 83% CSA Hosted by an NGO? 78% 83% CSA registered as an Independent Entity? 17% 17% Memorandum of Understanding between the CSA and host organization? 44% 17% Full-time CSA coordinator? 43% 67% ToR for the steering group or executive committee? 65% 83% Steering group or an executive committee? 78% 100% Do you have decentralized representation as a CSA (e.g at a district level)? 48% 33% Membership development strategy? 35% 17% Sustainability Plan? 22% 17% Conflict of interest policy? 22% 0% Membership application/screening process? 70% 83% Process for resolving conflict between members of the CSA? 30% 17% Process for nominating and facilitating equitable access to opportunities? 22% 17% CSA organisations internal registry 65% 50% Process for tracking of women’s participation in leadership of the CSA? 22% 17% Advocacy strategy Total CSAs Asian CSAs Does your CSA have its own advocacy, communications and/or social mobilization plan?52% 67% Contribution to a national advocacy and communications strategy aligned to the country plan, efforts and priorities86% 100% Regional advocacy initiatives 52% 17% International advocacy initiatives 43% 33% Increased resources for nutrition 90% 83% Do you have nutrition champions 48% 33% Advocacy Theme Improved budget tracking by government for nutrition 48% 17% Improved allocation of resources for nutrition 81% 67% Civil society financial contributions to the nutrition sector 43% 33% Breastmilk substitute marketing code 71% 67% Right to food and nutrition 71% 50% Food sovereignty 43% 17% Contribution to National Efforts National monitoring, evaluation and learning activities 67% 67% National nutrition plan development 76% 67% National nutrition information systems development 38% 33% 0% 0% Does your country have? 0% 0% A Nutrition Multi-sectoral Plan (NMP)? 86% 100% A Common Results Framework (CRF)? 57% 33% Themes Total CSAs Asian CSAs Agriculture 90% 100% Food Security 95% 100% Nutrition 95% 100% Education 90% 100% Health 95% 100% Social protection 81% 67% Water, sanitation and hygiene 86% 83% Right to food and nutrition 76% 33% Gender & Women's Empowerment 90% 100% Climate Change 43% 17% Support for exclusive breastfeeding up 90% 100% Micronutrient supplementation 76% 83% Fortification of foods 76% 67% Treatment of severe malnutrition 62% 50% Agriculture: Making nutritious food more accessible to everyone, and supporting small farms as a source of income for women and families81% 83% Education and Emplyment: Making sure children have the energy that they need to learn and earn sufficient income as adults52% 50% Clean Water and Sanitation: Improving access to reduce infection and disease 67% 67% Health Care: Improving access to services to ensure that women and children stay healthy81% 67% Support for Resilience: Establishing a stronger, healthier population and sustained prosperity to better endure emergencies and conflicts57% 50% Women’s Empowerment: Women empowered to be leaders in their families and communities, leading the way to a healthier and stronger world71% 67% Lao PDR Kyrgyz Republic The best practice to share is an advocating of amendments into the Law on Flour Fortification to implement mandatory flour fortification. Representatives from NGOs were trained on nutrition and flour fortification topics, printed materials were distributed. About 17 organisations took part in the advocacy work directly and they engaged their own partners in collecting signatures of people on community level, sent letters to parliamentarians. Members participated in TV talk shows, visited parliamentarians to inform them about importance of flour fortification. Pakistan Constant engagement with general members of CSA Engagement of media and other like minded coalitions in nutrition advocacy Cambodia In Cambodia, we found that since the Cambodia SUN CSA has been established in the last few months, the Civil Society has very stronger voice to advocate for nutrition related agenda with the government. In the past, individual NGO advocated for anything they wanted with government. Now, instead of individual NGO approaches to government for advocacy, we come as a team. This is more effective and makes the government listens to us well. Myanmar Coming together as an MSP has proven difficult in Myanmar, so the CSA has been actively working to increase opportunities for informal engagement and experience sharing with other networks. For example, we meet regularly with the UN Network in Yangon and have begun to schedule meetings with representatives of donor agencies in order to strengthen the Donor Network. We have also created an email list in order to facilitate regular communication with the MSP. Nepal The national alliance and formation of district chapters to bridge between community and national level. A lobby team within CSAN with experts. Regular coordination with government to recognize the advocacy issues Media engagement is the best means for highlighting the issue in general public and among policy makers. Signatory commitment collection is found effective to generate ownership on issue. Real case collection and video show are found as best means as advocacy tools Regular meetings and sharing of information among CSOs Learning needs (“Priorities for support”) Knowledge and IEC material collection, dissemination and sharing. Grants management (e.g. SUN CSA provides small grants to local civil society from larger INGOs members) Kyrgyz Republic Development of MSP ; Flour fortification ; Development of CSA ; Budget analysis. Pakistan Additional Resources for Nutrition Implementation of Multi-sectoral Plans Myanmar Develop effective advocacy plan Nepal Identifying additional funding opportunities. The donor convener has not been active in the MSP and the CSA is currently seeking continued funding to cover program costs. Best practices Lao PDR Cambodia SUN CSA Laos has only been fully operational late 2014, thus we do not have a lot of lessons or best practices to share. However, we could share our experiences we had on building momentum from members and government counterparts. How we were able to increase our members, commitment from our management committee as well as gain acceptance from the government to be involved in many health and nutrition related discussions, events and meetings.