ASEPTIC PROCESSING & MEDIA FILL TEST
1
Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING - OVERVIEW
• CERTAIN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS MUST BE STERILE
• INJECTIONS, OPHTHALMIC PREPARATIONS, IRRIGATIONS
SOLUTIONS, HAEMODIALYSIS SOLUTIONS
• TWO CATEGORIES OF STERILE PRODUCTS
• THOSE THAT CAN BE STERILIZED IN FINAL CONTAINER
(TERMINALLY STERILIZED)
• THOSE THAT CANNOT BE TERMINALLY STERILIZED AND MUST BE
ASEPTICALLY PREPARED
2Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING - OVERVIEW
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
• OBJECTIVE IS TO MAINTAIN THE STERILITY OF A PRODUCT,
ASSEMBLED FROM STERILE COMPONENTS
• OPERATING CONDITIONS SO AS TO PREVENT MICROBIAL
CONTAMINATION
3Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING - OVERVIEW
OBJECTIVE
• TO REVIEW SPECIFIC ISSUES RELATING TO THE MANUFACTURE OF
ASEPTICALLY PREPARED PRODUCTS:
• MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
• CLEAN AREAS
• PERSONNEL
• PREPARATION AND FILTRATION OF SOLUTIONS
• PRE-FILTRATION BIOBURDEN
• FILTER INTEGRITY/VALIDATION
• EQUIPMENT/CONTAINER PREPARATION AND STERILIZATION
• FILLING PROCESS
• VALIDATION OF ASEPTIC PROCESSES
4Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
CLASSIFICATION OF CLEAN AREAS
• COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATIONS
5
WHO GMP US 209E US Customary ISO/TC (209)
ISO 14644
EEC GMP
Grade A M 3.5 Class 100 ISO 5 Grade A
Grade B M 3.5 Class 100 ISO 5 Grade B
Grade C M 5.5 Class 10 000 ISO 7 Grade C
Grade D M 6.5 Class 100 000 ISO 8 Grade D
Table 1
Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
CLASSIFICATION OF CLEAN AREAS
• CLASSIFIED IN TERMS OF AIRBORNE PARTICLES (TABLE 2)
6
Grade At rest In operation
maximum permitted number of particles/m3
0.5 - 5.0 µm > 5 µm 0.5 - 5.0 µm > 5 µ
A 3 500 0 3 500 0
B 3 500 0 350 000 2 000
C 350 000 2 000 3 500 000 20 000
D 3 500 000 20 000 not defined not defined
“At rest” - production equipment installed and operating
“In operation” - Installed equipment functioning in defined
operating mode and specified number of personnel present
Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
FOUR GRADES OF CLEAN AREAS:
• GRADE D (EQUIVALENT TO CLASS 100,000, ISO 8):
• CLEAN AREA FOR CARRYING OUT LESS CRITICAL STAGES IN MANUFACTURE
OF ASEPTICALLY PREPARED PRODUCTS EG. HANDLING OF COMPONENTS
AFTER WASHING.
• GRADE C (EQUIVALENT TO CLASS 10,000, ISO 7):
• CLEAN AREA FOR CARRYING OUT LESS CRITICAL STAGES IN MANUFACTURE
OF ASEPTICALLY PREPARED PRODUCTS EG. PREPARATION OF SOLUTIONS
TO BE FILTERED.
• GRADE B (EQUIVALENT TO CLASS 100, ISO 5):
• BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENT FOR GRADE A ZONE, EG. CLEANROOM IN
WHICH LAMINAR FLOW WORKSTATION IS HOUSED.
7Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
• GRADE A (EQUIVALENT TO CLASS 100 (US FEDERAL STANDARD 209E),
ISO 5 (ISO 14644-1):
• LOCAL ZONE FOR HIGH RISK OPERATIONS EG. PRODUCT FILLING,
STOPPER BOWLS, OPEN VIALS, HANDLING STERILE MATERIALS, ASEPTIC
CONNECTIONS, TRANSFER OF PARTIALLY STOPPERED CONTAINERS TO BE
LYOPHILIZED.
• CONDITIONS USUALLY PROVIDED BY LAMINAR AIR FLOW
WORKSTATION.
• EACH GRADE OF CLEANROOM HAS SPECIFICATIONS FOR VIABLE AND
NON-VIABLE PARTICLES
• NON-VIABLE PARTICLES ARE DEFINED BY THE AIR CLASSIFICATION (SEE
TABLE 2)
8Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
• LIMITS FOR VIABLE PARTICLES (MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION)
9
Grade Air sample
(CFU/m3)
Settle plates (90mm
diameter)
(CFU/4hours)
Contact plates
(55mm
diameter)
(CFU/plate)
Glove print
(5 fingers)
(CFU/glove)
A < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1
B 10 5 5 5
C 100 50 25 -
D 200 100 50 -
Table 3
– These are average values
– Individual settle plates may be exposed for 4 hours
• Values are for guidance only - not intended to represent specifications
• Levels (limits) of detection of microbiological contamination should be
established for alert and action purposes and for monitoring trends of air
quality in the facility
Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION
10Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
• PHYSICAL
• PARTICULATE MATTER
• DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURES
• AIR CHANGES, AIRFLOW PATTERNS
• CLEAN UP TIME/RECOVERY
• TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY
• AIRFLOW VELOCITY
11Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING - PHYSICAL
• PARTICULATE MATTER
• PARTICLES SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE THEY CAN CONTAMINATE
AND ALSO CARRY ORGANISMS
• CRITICAL ENVIRONMENT SHOULD BE MEASURED NOT MORE
THAN 30CM FROM WORKSITE, WITHIN AIRFLOW AND DURING
FILLING/CLOSING OPERATIONS
• PREFERABLY A REMOTE PROBE THAT MONITORS CONTINUOUSLY
• DIFFICULTIES WHEN PROCESS ITSELF GENERATES PARTICLES (E.G.
POWDER FILLING)
• APPROPRIATE ALERT AND ACTION LIMITS SHOULD BE SET AND
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS DEFINED IF LIMITS EXCEEDED
12Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING - PHYSICAL
• DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURES
• POSITIVE PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL OF 10-15 PASCALS SHOULD BE
MAINTAINED BETWEEN ADJACENT ROOMS OF DIFFERENT
CLASSIFICATION (WITH DOOR CLOSED)
• MOST CRITICAL AREA SHOULD HAVE THE HIGHEST PRESSURE
• PRESSURES SHOULD BE CONTINUOUSLY MONITORED AND
FREQUENTLY RECORDED.
• ALARMS SHOULD SOUND IF PRESSURES DEVIATE
• ANY DEVIATIONS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND EFFECT ON
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DETERMINED
13Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING - PHYSICAL
• AIR CHANGES/AIRFLOW PATTERNS
• AIR FLOW OVER CRITICAL AREAS SHOULD BE UNI-DIRECTIONAL (LAMINAR FLOW)
AT A VELOCITY SUFFICIENT TO SWEEP PARTICLES AWAY FROM FILLING/CLOSING
AREA
• FOR B, C AND D ROOMS AT LEAST 20 CHANGES PER HOUR ARE USUSALLY
REQUIRED
• CLEAN UP TIME/RECOVERY
• PARTICULATE LEVELS FOR THE GRADE A “AT REST” STATE SHOULD BE ACHIEVED
AFTER A SHORT “CLEAN-UP” PERIOD OF 20 MINUTES AFTER COMPLETION OF
OPERATIONS (GUIDANCE VALUE)
• PARTICLE COUNTS FOR GRADE A “IN OPERATION” STATE SHOULD BE MAINTAINED
WHENEVER PRODUCT OR OPEN CONTAINER IS EXPOSED
14Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING - PHYSICAL
• TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY
• AMBIENT TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY SHOULD NOT BE
UNCOMFORTABLY HIGH (COULD CAUSE OPERATORS TO
GENERATE PARTICLES) (18°C)
• AIRFLOW VELOCITY
• LAMINAR AIRFLOW WORKSTATION AIR SPEED OF APPROX
0.45M/S ± 20% AT WORKING POSITION (GUIDANCE
VALUE)
15Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
PERSONNEL
• MINIMUM NUMBER OF PERSONNEL IN CLEAN AREA
• ESPECIALLY DURING ASEPTIC PROCESSING
• INSPECTIONS AND CONTROLS FROM OUTSIDE
• TRAINING TO ALL INCLUDING CLEANING & MAINTENANCE STAFF
• INITIAL AND REGULAR
• MANUFACTURING, HYGIENE, MICROBIOLOGY
• SHOULD BE FORMALLY VALIDATED AND AUTHORIZED TO ENTER ASEPTIC
AREA
• SPECIAL CASES
• SUPERVISION IN CASE OF OUTSIDE STAFF
• DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES (E.G. STAFF WHO WORKED WITH
ANIMAL TISSUE MATERIALS)
16Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
PERSONNEL (2)
• HIGH STANDARDS OF HYGIENE AND CLEANLINESS
• SHOULD NOT ENTER CLEAN ROOMS IF ILL OR WITH OPEN
WOUNDS
• PERIODIC HEALTH CHECKS
• NO SHEDDING OF PARTICLES, MOVEMENT SLOW AND
CONTROLLED
• NO INTRODUCTION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL HAZARDS
• NO OUTDOOR CLOTHING BROUGHT INTO CLEAN AREAS,
SHOULD BE CLAD IN FACTORY CLOTHING
• CHANGING AND WASHING PROCEDURE
• NO WATCHES, JEWELLERY AND COSMETICS
• EYE CHECKS IF INVOLVED IN VISUAL INSPECTION
17Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
PERSONNEL (3)
• CLOTHING OF APPROPRIATE QUALITY:
• GRADE D
• HAIR, BEARD, MOUSTACHE COVERED
• PROTECTIVE CLOTHING AND SHOES
• GRADE C
• HAIR, BEARD, MOUSTACHE COVERED
• SINGLE OR 2-PIECE SUIT (COVERING WRISTS, HIGH NECK),
SHOES/OVERSHOES
• NO FIBRES/PARTICLES TO BE SHED
• GRADE A AND B
• HEADGEAR, BEARD AND MOUSTACHE COVERED, MASKS, GLOVES
• NOT SHEDDING FIBRES, AND RETAIN PARTICLES SHED BY OPERATORS
18Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
PERSONNEL (4)
• OUTDOOR CLOTHING NOT IN CHANGE ROOMS LEADING TO
GRADE B AND C ROOMS
• CHANGE AT EVERY WORKING SESSION, OR ONCE A DAY (IF
SUPPORTIVE DATA)
• CHANGE GLOVES AND MASKS AT EVERY WORKING SESSION
• FREQUENT DISINFECTION OF GLOVES DURING OPERATIONS
• WASHING OF GARMENTS – SEPARATE LAUNDRY FACILITY
• NO DAMAGE, AND ACCORDING TO VALIDATED PROCEDURES
(WASHING AND STERILIZATION)
• REGULAR MICROBIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF OPERATORS
19Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
• IN ASEPTIC PROCESSING, EACH COMPONENT IS INDIVIDUALLY
STERILISED, OR SEVERAL COMPONENTS ARE COMBINED WITH THE
RESULTING MIXTURE STERILIZED.
• MOST COMMON IS PREPARATION OF A SOLUTION WHICH IS FILTERED
THROUGH A STERILIZING FILTER THEN FILLED INTO STERILE CONTAINERS
(E.G ACTIVE AND EXCIPIENTS DISSOLVED IN WATER FOR INJECTION)
• MAY INVOLVE ASEPTIC COMPOUNDING OF PREVIOUSLY STERILIZED
COMPONENTS WHICH IS FILLED INTO STERILE CONTAINERS
• MAY INVOLVE FILLING OF PREVIOUSLY STERILIZED POWDER
• STERILIZED BY DRY HEAT/IRRADIATION
• PRODUCED FROM A STERILE FILTERED SOLUTION WHICH IS THEN ASEPTICALLY
CRYSTALLIZED AND PRECIPITATED
• REQUIRES MORE HANDLING AND MANIPULATION WITH HIGHER POTENTIAL FOR
CONTAMINATION DURING PROCESSING
20Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
PREPARATION AND FILTRATION OF SOLUTIONS
• SOLUTIONS TO BE STERILE FILTERED PREPARED IN A GRADE C
ENVIRONMENT
• IF NOT TO BE FILTERED, PREPARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED IN A
GRADE A ENVIRONMENT WITH GRADE B BACKGROUND (E.G.
OINTMENTS, CREAMS, SUSPENSIONS AND EMULSIONS)
• PREPARED SOLUTIONS FILTERED THROUGH A STERILE 0.22ΜM (OR
LESS) MEMBRANE FILTER INTO A PREVIOUSLY STERILIZED CONTAINER
• FILTERS REMOVE BACTERIA AND MOULDS
• FILTRATION SHOULD BE CARRIED OUT UNDER POSITIVE PRESSURE
21Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
PREPARATION AND FILTRATION OF SOLUTIONS
• TIME LIMITS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED FOR EACH PHASE OF
PROCESSING, E.G.
• MAXIMUM PERIOD BETWEEN START OF BULK PRODUCT
COMPOUNDING AND STERILIZATION (FILTRATION)
• MAXIMUM PERMITTED HOLDING TIME OF BULK IF HELD AFTER
FILTRATION PRIOR TO FILLING
• PRODUCT EXPOSURE ON PROCESSING LINE
• STORAGE OF STERILIZED CONTAINERS/COMPONENTS
• TOTAL TIME FOR PRODUCT FILTRATION TO PREVENT ORGANISMS
FROM PENETRATING FILTER
• MAXIMUM TIME FOR UPSTREAM FILTERS USED FOR CLARIFICATION
OR PARTICLE REMOVAL (CAN SUPPORT MICROBIAL ATTACHMENT)
22Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
FILTER INTEGRITY
• FILTERS OF 0.22ΜM OR LESS SHOULD BE USED FOR FILTRATION OF
LIQUIDS AND GASSES (IF APPLICABLE)
• FILTERS FOR GASSES THAT MAY BE USED FOR PURGING OR
OVERLAYING OF FILLED CONTAINERS OR TO RELEASE VACUUM IN
FILTER INTERGRITY SHOULD BE VERIFIED BEFORE FILTRATION AND
CONFIRMED AFTER FILTRATION
• BUBBLE POINT
• PRESSURE HOLD
• METHODS ARE DEFINED BY FILTER MANUFACTURERS AND LIMITS
DETERMINED DURING FILTER VALIDATION
23Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
EQUIPMENT/CONTAINER PREPARATION & STERILIZATION
• ALL EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCT CONTAINERS SHOULD BE STERILIZED USING
VALIDATED CYCLES
• PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO STOPPERS - SHOULD NOT BE TIGHTLY PACKED AS
MAY CLUMP TOGETHER AND AFFECT AIR REMOVAL DURING VACUUM STAGE OF
STERILIZATION PROCESS
• EQUIPMENT WRAPPED AND LOADED TO FACILITATE AIR REMOVAL
• PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO FILTERS, HOUSINGS AND TUBING
• HEAT TUNNELS OFTEN USED FOR STERILIZATION/DEPYROGENATION OF GLASS VIALS
• USUALLY HIGH TEMPERATURE FOR SHORT PERIOD OF TIME 320 FOR 5MIN
• NEED TO CONSIDER SPEED OF CONVEYOR
• VALIDATION OF DEPYROGENATION (3 LOGS ENDOTOXIN UNITS)
• WORST CASE LOCATIONS
• TUNNEL SUPPLIED WITH HEPA FILTERED AIR (CLASS 100)
24Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
EQUIPMENT/CONTAINER PREPARATION & STERILIZATION
• EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO BE EASILY ASSEMBLED AND DISASSEMBLED,
CLEANED, SANITISED AND/OR STERILIZED
• EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE APPROPRIATELY CLEANED - O-RINGS AND GASKETS
SHOULD BE REMOVED TO PREVENT BUILD UP OF DIRT OR RESIDUES
• RINSE WATER SHOULD BE WFI GRADE
• EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE LEFT DRY UNLESS STERILIZED IMMEDIATELY AFTER CLEANING
(TO PREVENT BUILD UP OF PYROGENS)
• WASHING OF GLASS CONTAINERS AND RUBBER STOPPERS SHOULD BE VALIDATED
FOR ENDOTOXIN REMOVAL
• SHOULD BE DEFINED STORAGE PERIOD BETWEEN STERILIZATION AND USE (PERIOD
SHOULD BE JUSTIFIED)
25Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
PROCESS VALIDATION (MEDIA FILL TEST)
• NOT POSSIBLE TO DEFINE A STERILITY ASSURANCE LEVEL FOR
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
• PROCESS IS VALIDATED BY SIMULATING THE
MANUFACTURING PROCESS USING MICROBIOLOGICAL
GROWTH MEDIUM (MEDIA FILL)
• PROCESS SIMULATION INCLUDES FORMULATION (COMPOUNDING),
FILTRATION AND FILLING WITH SUITABLE MEDIA USING THE SAME
PROCESSES INVOLVED IN MANUFACTURE OF THE PRODUCT
• PROCESS SIMULATION FOR FORMULATION STAGE SHOULD BE PERFORMED AT
LEAST TWICE PER YEAR.
26Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
PROCESS VALIDATION (MEDIA MILL TEST)
• MEDIA FILL PROGRAM SHOULD INCLUDE WORST CASE ACTIVITIES
• FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH LONGEST PERMITTED RUN (E.G. OPERATOR FATIGUE)
• REPRESENTATIVE NUMBER, TYPE, AND COMPLEXITY OF NORMAL INTERVENTIONS,
NON-ROUTINE INTERVENTIONS AND EVENTS (E.G. MAINTENANCE, ELECTRIC SHUT
DOWN, PERSONAL INTRUSION ETC)
• NO OF PERSONNEL & THEIR ACTIVITIES, SHIFT CHANGES, BREAKS, GOWN
CHANGES
• REPRESENTATIVE NUMBER OF ASEPTIC ADDITIONS (E.G. CHARGING CONTAINERS,
CLOSURES, STERILE INGREDIENTS) OR TRANSFERS
• ASEPTIC EQUIPMENT CONNECTIONS/DISCONNECTIONS
• ASEPTIC SAMPLE COLLECTIONS
• LINE SPEED AND CONFIGURATION
• WEIGHT CHECKS
• CONTAINER CLOSURE SYSTEMS
• WRITTEN BATCH RECORD DOCUMENTING CONDITIONS AND ACTIVITIES
27
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
DURATION
• DEPENDS ON TYPE OF OPERATION
• PROCESSES - SUFFICIENT TIME TO INCLUDE MANIPULATIONS AND INTERVENTIONS
• FOR CONVENTIONAL OPERATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE THE TOTAL FILLING TIME
SIZE
• 5000 - 10000 GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE OR BATCH SIZE IF <5000
• FOR MANUALLY INTENSIVE PROCESSES LARGER NUMBERS SHOULD BE FILLED
• LOWER NUMBERS CAN BE FILLED FOR ISOLATORS
28
PROCESS VALIDATION (MEDIA FILL TEST )
FREQUENCY AND NUMBER
– THREE INITIAL, CONSECUTIVE PER SHIFT
– SUBSEQUENTLY SEMI-ANNUAL PER SHIFT AND PROCESS
– ALL PERSONNEL SHOULD PARTICIPATE AT LEAST ANNUALLY, CONSISTENT WITH ROUTINE
DUTIES
– CHANGES SHOULD BE ASSESSED AND REVALIDATION CARRIED OUT AS REQUIRED
LINE SPEED
– SPEED DEPENDS ON TYPE OF PROCESS
Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
PROCESS VALIDATION (MEDIA FILL TEST)
• ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
• REPRESENTATIVE OF ACTUAL PRODUCTION CONDITIONS (NO. OF
PERSONNEL, ACTIVITY LEVELS ETC) - NO SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS (NOT
INCLUDING ADJUSTMENT OF HVAC)
• IF NITROGEN USED FOR OVERLAYING/PURGING NEED TO SUBSTITUTE WITH
AIR
• MEDIA
• ANAEROBIC MEDIA SHOULD BE CONSIDERED UNDER CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES
• SHOULD BE TESTED FOR GROWTH PROMOTING PROPERTIES (INCLUDING
FACTORY ISOLATES)
29Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
PROCESS VALIDATION (MEDIA FILL TEST)
• INCUBATION, EXAMINATION
• IN THE RANGE 20-35ºC (20-25ºC FOR FUNGAL & 30-35ºC FOR BACTERIA.
• IF TWO TEMPERATURES ARE USED, LOWER TEMPERATURE FIRST
• INSPECTION BY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL.
• ALL INTEGRAL UNITS SHOULD BE INCUBATED. SHOULD BE JUSTIFICATION
FOR ANY UNITS NOT INCUBATED.
• UNITS REMOVED (AND NOT INCUBATED) SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH
ROUTINE PRACTICES (ALTHOUGH INCUBATION WOULD GIVE
INFORMATION REGARDING RISK OF INTERVENTION)
• BATCH RECONCILIATION
30Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
PROCESS VALIDATION (MEDIA FILL TEST)
• INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
• WHEN FILLING FEWER THAN 5000 UNITS:
• NO CONTAMINATED UNITS SHOULD BE DETECTED
• ONE (1) CONTAMINATED UNIT IS CONSIDERED CAUSE
FOR REVALIDATION, FOLLOWING AN INVESTIGATION
• WHEN FILLING FROM 5000-10000 UNITS
• ONE (1) CONTAMINATED UNIT SHOULD RESULT IN AN INVESTIGATION, INCLUDING
CONSIDERATION OF A REPEAT MEDIA FILL
• TWO (2) CONTAMINATED UNITS ARE CONSIDERED CAUSE FOR REVALIDATION,
FOLLOWING INVESTIGATION
• WHEN FILLING MORE THAN 10000 UNITS
• ONE (1) CONTAMINATED UNIT SHOULD RESULT IN AN INVESTIGATION
• TWO (2) CONTAMINATED UNITS ARE CONSIDERED CAUSE FOR REVALIDATION,
FOLLOWING INVESTIGATION
31Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
ASEPTIC PROCESSING
PROCESS VALIDATION (MEDIA FILL TEST)
• INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
• MEDIA FILLS SHOULD BE OBSERVED BY QC AND CONTAMINATED UNITS
RECONCILABLE WITH TIME AND ACTIVITY BEING SIMULATED (VIDEO MAY
HELP)
• IDEALLY - NO CONTAMINATION. ANY CONTAMINATION SHOULD BE
INVESTIGATED.
• ANY ORGANISMS ISOLATED SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED TO SPECIES LEVEL
(GENOTYPIC IDENTIFICATION)
• INVALIDATION OF A MEDIA FILL RUN SHOULD BE RARE
32Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
33
CASE STUDY 01
Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
34
CASE STUDY 02
THANK YOU
Questionnaires
35

Aseptic Processing & Media Fill

  • 1.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING &MEDIA FILL TEST 1 Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 2.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING -OVERVIEW • CERTAIN PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS MUST BE STERILE • INJECTIONS, OPHTHALMIC PREPARATIONS, IRRIGATIONS SOLUTIONS, HAEMODIALYSIS SOLUTIONS • TWO CATEGORIES OF STERILE PRODUCTS • THOSE THAT CAN BE STERILIZED IN FINAL CONTAINER (TERMINALLY STERILIZED) • THOSE THAT CANNOT BE TERMINALLY STERILIZED AND MUST BE ASEPTICALLY PREPARED 2Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 3.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING -OVERVIEW ASEPTIC PROCESSING • OBJECTIVE IS TO MAINTAIN THE STERILITY OF A PRODUCT, ASSEMBLED FROM STERILE COMPONENTS • OPERATING CONDITIONS SO AS TO PREVENT MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION 3Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 4.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING -OVERVIEW OBJECTIVE • TO REVIEW SPECIFIC ISSUES RELATING TO THE MANUFACTURE OF ASEPTICALLY PREPARED PRODUCTS: • MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT • CLEAN AREAS • PERSONNEL • PREPARATION AND FILTRATION OF SOLUTIONS • PRE-FILTRATION BIOBURDEN • FILTER INTEGRITY/VALIDATION • EQUIPMENT/CONTAINER PREPARATION AND STERILIZATION • FILLING PROCESS • VALIDATION OF ASEPTIC PROCESSES 4Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 5.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT CLASSIFICATION OFCLEAN AREAS • COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATIONS 5 WHO GMP US 209E US Customary ISO/TC (209) ISO 14644 EEC GMP Grade A M 3.5 Class 100 ISO 5 Grade A Grade B M 3.5 Class 100 ISO 5 Grade B Grade C M 5.5 Class 10 000 ISO 7 Grade C Grade D M 6.5 Class 100 000 ISO 8 Grade D Table 1 Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 6.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT CLASSIFICATION OFCLEAN AREAS • CLASSIFIED IN TERMS OF AIRBORNE PARTICLES (TABLE 2) 6 Grade At rest In operation maximum permitted number of particles/m3 0.5 - 5.0 µm > 5 µm 0.5 - 5.0 µm > 5 µ A 3 500 0 3 500 0 B 3 500 0 350 000 2 000 C 350 000 2 000 3 500 000 20 000 D 3 500 000 20 000 not defined not defined “At rest” - production equipment installed and operating “In operation” - Installed equipment functioning in defined operating mode and specified number of personnel present Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 7.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT FOUR GRADESOF CLEAN AREAS: • GRADE D (EQUIVALENT TO CLASS 100,000, ISO 8): • CLEAN AREA FOR CARRYING OUT LESS CRITICAL STAGES IN MANUFACTURE OF ASEPTICALLY PREPARED PRODUCTS EG. HANDLING OF COMPONENTS AFTER WASHING. • GRADE C (EQUIVALENT TO CLASS 10,000, ISO 7): • CLEAN AREA FOR CARRYING OUT LESS CRITICAL STAGES IN MANUFACTURE OF ASEPTICALLY PREPARED PRODUCTS EG. PREPARATION OF SOLUTIONS TO BE FILTERED. • GRADE B (EQUIVALENT TO CLASS 100, ISO 5): • BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENT FOR GRADE A ZONE, EG. CLEANROOM IN WHICH LAMINAR FLOW WORKSTATION IS HOUSED. 7Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 8.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT • GRADEA (EQUIVALENT TO CLASS 100 (US FEDERAL STANDARD 209E), ISO 5 (ISO 14644-1): • LOCAL ZONE FOR HIGH RISK OPERATIONS EG. PRODUCT FILLING, STOPPER BOWLS, OPEN VIALS, HANDLING STERILE MATERIALS, ASEPTIC CONNECTIONS, TRANSFER OF PARTIALLY STOPPERED CONTAINERS TO BE LYOPHILIZED. • CONDITIONS USUALLY PROVIDED BY LAMINAR AIR FLOW WORKSTATION. • EACH GRADE OF CLEANROOM HAS SPECIFICATIONS FOR VIABLE AND NON-VIABLE PARTICLES • NON-VIABLE PARTICLES ARE DEFINED BY THE AIR CLASSIFICATION (SEE TABLE 2) 8Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 9.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT • LIMITSFOR VIABLE PARTICLES (MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION) 9 Grade Air sample (CFU/m3) Settle plates (90mm diameter) (CFU/4hours) Contact plates (55mm diameter) (CFU/plate) Glove print (5 fingers) (CFU/glove) A < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 B 10 5 5 5 C 100 50 25 - D 200 100 50 - Table 3 – These are average values – Individual settle plates may be exposed for 4 hours • Values are for guidance only - not intended to represent specifications • Levels (limits) of detection of microbiological contamination should be established for alert and action purposes and for monitoring trends of air quality in the facility Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 10.
    SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION 10Discussed& Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 11.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING •PHYSICAL • PARTICULATE MATTER • DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURES • AIR CHANGES, AIRFLOW PATTERNS • CLEAN UP TIME/RECOVERY • TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY • AIRFLOW VELOCITY 11Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 12.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING- PHYSICAL • PARTICULATE MATTER • PARTICLES SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE THEY CAN CONTAMINATE AND ALSO CARRY ORGANISMS • CRITICAL ENVIRONMENT SHOULD BE MEASURED NOT MORE THAN 30CM FROM WORKSITE, WITHIN AIRFLOW AND DURING FILLING/CLOSING OPERATIONS • PREFERABLY A REMOTE PROBE THAT MONITORS CONTINUOUSLY • DIFFICULTIES WHEN PROCESS ITSELF GENERATES PARTICLES (E.G. POWDER FILLING) • APPROPRIATE ALERT AND ACTION LIMITS SHOULD BE SET AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS DEFINED IF LIMITS EXCEEDED 12Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 13.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING- PHYSICAL • DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURES • POSITIVE PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL OF 10-15 PASCALS SHOULD BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ADJACENT ROOMS OF DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION (WITH DOOR CLOSED) • MOST CRITICAL AREA SHOULD HAVE THE HIGHEST PRESSURE • PRESSURES SHOULD BE CONTINUOUSLY MONITORED AND FREQUENTLY RECORDED. • ALARMS SHOULD SOUND IF PRESSURES DEVIATE • ANY DEVIATIONS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND EFFECT ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DETERMINED 13Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 14.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING- PHYSICAL • AIR CHANGES/AIRFLOW PATTERNS • AIR FLOW OVER CRITICAL AREAS SHOULD BE UNI-DIRECTIONAL (LAMINAR FLOW) AT A VELOCITY SUFFICIENT TO SWEEP PARTICLES AWAY FROM FILLING/CLOSING AREA • FOR B, C AND D ROOMS AT LEAST 20 CHANGES PER HOUR ARE USUSALLY REQUIRED • CLEAN UP TIME/RECOVERY • PARTICULATE LEVELS FOR THE GRADE A “AT REST” STATE SHOULD BE ACHIEVED AFTER A SHORT “CLEAN-UP” PERIOD OF 20 MINUTES AFTER COMPLETION OF OPERATIONS (GUIDANCE VALUE) • PARTICLE COUNTS FOR GRADE A “IN OPERATION” STATE SHOULD BE MAINTAINED WHENEVER PRODUCT OR OPEN CONTAINER IS EXPOSED 14Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 15.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING- PHYSICAL • TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY • AMBIENT TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY SHOULD NOT BE UNCOMFORTABLY HIGH (COULD CAUSE OPERATORS TO GENERATE PARTICLES) (18°C) • AIRFLOW VELOCITY • LAMINAR AIRFLOW WORKSTATION AIR SPEED OF APPROX 0.45M/S ± 20% AT WORKING POSITION (GUIDANCE VALUE) 15Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 16.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT PERSONNEL • MINIMUMNUMBER OF PERSONNEL IN CLEAN AREA • ESPECIALLY DURING ASEPTIC PROCESSING • INSPECTIONS AND CONTROLS FROM OUTSIDE • TRAINING TO ALL INCLUDING CLEANING & MAINTENANCE STAFF • INITIAL AND REGULAR • MANUFACTURING, HYGIENE, MICROBIOLOGY • SHOULD BE FORMALLY VALIDATED AND AUTHORIZED TO ENTER ASEPTIC AREA • SPECIAL CASES • SUPERVISION IN CASE OF OUTSIDE STAFF • DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES (E.G. STAFF WHO WORKED WITH ANIMAL TISSUE MATERIALS) 16Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 17.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT PERSONNEL (2) •HIGH STANDARDS OF HYGIENE AND CLEANLINESS • SHOULD NOT ENTER CLEAN ROOMS IF ILL OR WITH OPEN WOUNDS • PERIODIC HEALTH CHECKS • NO SHEDDING OF PARTICLES, MOVEMENT SLOW AND CONTROLLED • NO INTRODUCTION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL HAZARDS • NO OUTDOOR CLOTHING BROUGHT INTO CLEAN AREAS, SHOULD BE CLAD IN FACTORY CLOTHING • CHANGING AND WASHING PROCEDURE • NO WATCHES, JEWELLERY AND COSMETICS • EYE CHECKS IF INVOLVED IN VISUAL INSPECTION 17Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 18.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT PERSONNEL (3) •CLOTHING OF APPROPRIATE QUALITY: • GRADE D • HAIR, BEARD, MOUSTACHE COVERED • PROTECTIVE CLOTHING AND SHOES • GRADE C • HAIR, BEARD, MOUSTACHE COVERED • SINGLE OR 2-PIECE SUIT (COVERING WRISTS, HIGH NECK), SHOES/OVERSHOES • NO FIBRES/PARTICLES TO BE SHED • GRADE A AND B • HEADGEAR, BEARD AND MOUSTACHE COVERED, MASKS, GLOVES • NOT SHEDDING FIBRES, AND RETAIN PARTICLES SHED BY OPERATORS 18Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 19.
    MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT PERSONNEL (4) •OUTDOOR CLOTHING NOT IN CHANGE ROOMS LEADING TO GRADE B AND C ROOMS • CHANGE AT EVERY WORKING SESSION, OR ONCE A DAY (IF SUPPORTIVE DATA) • CHANGE GLOVES AND MASKS AT EVERY WORKING SESSION • FREQUENT DISINFECTION OF GLOVES DURING OPERATIONS • WASHING OF GARMENTS – SEPARATE LAUNDRY FACILITY • NO DAMAGE, AND ACCORDING TO VALIDATED PROCEDURES (WASHING AND STERILIZATION) • REGULAR MICROBIOLOGICAL MONITORING OF OPERATORS 19Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 20.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING • INASEPTIC PROCESSING, EACH COMPONENT IS INDIVIDUALLY STERILISED, OR SEVERAL COMPONENTS ARE COMBINED WITH THE RESULTING MIXTURE STERILIZED. • MOST COMMON IS PREPARATION OF A SOLUTION WHICH IS FILTERED THROUGH A STERILIZING FILTER THEN FILLED INTO STERILE CONTAINERS (E.G ACTIVE AND EXCIPIENTS DISSOLVED IN WATER FOR INJECTION) • MAY INVOLVE ASEPTIC COMPOUNDING OF PREVIOUSLY STERILIZED COMPONENTS WHICH IS FILLED INTO STERILE CONTAINERS • MAY INVOLVE FILLING OF PREVIOUSLY STERILIZED POWDER • STERILIZED BY DRY HEAT/IRRADIATION • PRODUCED FROM A STERILE FILTERED SOLUTION WHICH IS THEN ASEPTICALLY CRYSTALLIZED AND PRECIPITATED • REQUIRES MORE HANDLING AND MANIPULATION WITH HIGHER POTENTIAL FOR CONTAMINATION DURING PROCESSING 20Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 21.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING PREPARATION ANDFILTRATION OF SOLUTIONS • SOLUTIONS TO BE STERILE FILTERED PREPARED IN A GRADE C ENVIRONMENT • IF NOT TO BE FILTERED, PREPARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED IN A GRADE A ENVIRONMENT WITH GRADE B BACKGROUND (E.G. OINTMENTS, CREAMS, SUSPENSIONS AND EMULSIONS) • PREPARED SOLUTIONS FILTERED THROUGH A STERILE 0.22ΜM (OR LESS) MEMBRANE FILTER INTO A PREVIOUSLY STERILIZED CONTAINER • FILTERS REMOVE BACTERIA AND MOULDS • FILTRATION SHOULD BE CARRIED OUT UNDER POSITIVE PRESSURE 21Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 22.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING PREPARATION ANDFILTRATION OF SOLUTIONS • TIME LIMITS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED FOR EACH PHASE OF PROCESSING, E.G. • MAXIMUM PERIOD BETWEEN START OF BULK PRODUCT COMPOUNDING AND STERILIZATION (FILTRATION) • MAXIMUM PERMITTED HOLDING TIME OF BULK IF HELD AFTER FILTRATION PRIOR TO FILLING • PRODUCT EXPOSURE ON PROCESSING LINE • STORAGE OF STERILIZED CONTAINERS/COMPONENTS • TOTAL TIME FOR PRODUCT FILTRATION TO PREVENT ORGANISMS FROM PENETRATING FILTER • MAXIMUM TIME FOR UPSTREAM FILTERS USED FOR CLARIFICATION OR PARTICLE REMOVAL (CAN SUPPORT MICROBIAL ATTACHMENT) 22Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 23.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING FILTER INTEGRITY •FILTERS OF 0.22ΜM OR LESS SHOULD BE USED FOR FILTRATION OF LIQUIDS AND GASSES (IF APPLICABLE) • FILTERS FOR GASSES THAT MAY BE USED FOR PURGING OR OVERLAYING OF FILLED CONTAINERS OR TO RELEASE VACUUM IN FILTER INTERGRITY SHOULD BE VERIFIED BEFORE FILTRATION AND CONFIRMED AFTER FILTRATION • BUBBLE POINT • PRESSURE HOLD • METHODS ARE DEFINED BY FILTER MANUFACTURERS AND LIMITS DETERMINED DURING FILTER VALIDATION 23Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 24.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING EQUIPMENT/CONTAINER PREPARATION& STERILIZATION • ALL EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCT CONTAINERS SHOULD BE STERILIZED USING VALIDATED CYCLES • PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO STOPPERS - SHOULD NOT BE TIGHTLY PACKED AS MAY CLUMP TOGETHER AND AFFECT AIR REMOVAL DURING VACUUM STAGE OF STERILIZATION PROCESS • EQUIPMENT WRAPPED AND LOADED TO FACILITATE AIR REMOVAL • PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO FILTERS, HOUSINGS AND TUBING • HEAT TUNNELS OFTEN USED FOR STERILIZATION/DEPYROGENATION OF GLASS VIALS • USUALLY HIGH TEMPERATURE FOR SHORT PERIOD OF TIME 320 FOR 5MIN • NEED TO CONSIDER SPEED OF CONVEYOR • VALIDATION OF DEPYROGENATION (3 LOGS ENDOTOXIN UNITS) • WORST CASE LOCATIONS • TUNNEL SUPPLIED WITH HEPA FILTERED AIR (CLASS 100) 24Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 25.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING EQUIPMENT/CONTAINER PREPARATION& STERILIZATION • EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO BE EASILY ASSEMBLED AND DISASSEMBLED, CLEANED, SANITISED AND/OR STERILIZED • EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE APPROPRIATELY CLEANED - O-RINGS AND GASKETS SHOULD BE REMOVED TO PREVENT BUILD UP OF DIRT OR RESIDUES • RINSE WATER SHOULD BE WFI GRADE • EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE LEFT DRY UNLESS STERILIZED IMMEDIATELY AFTER CLEANING (TO PREVENT BUILD UP OF PYROGENS) • WASHING OF GLASS CONTAINERS AND RUBBER STOPPERS SHOULD BE VALIDATED FOR ENDOTOXIN REMOVAL • SHOULD BE DEFINED STORAGE PERIOD BETWEEN STERILIZATION AND USE (PERIOD SHOULD BE JUSTIFIED) 25Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 26.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING PROCESS VALIDATION(MEDIA FILL TEST) • NOT POSSIBLE TO DEFINE A STERILITY ASSURANCE LEVEL FOR ASEPTIC PROCESSING • PROCESS IS VALIDATED BY SIMULATING THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS USING MICROBIOLOGICAL GROWTH MEDIUM (MEDIA FILL) • PROCESS SIMULATION INCLUDES FORMULATION (COMPOUNDING), FILTRATION AND FILLING WITH SUITABLE MEDIA USING THE SAME PROCESSES INVOLVED IN MANUFACTURE OF THE PRODUCT • PROCESS SIMULATION FOR FORMULATION STAGE SHOULD BE PERFORMED AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR. 26Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 27.
    PROCESS VALIDATION (MEDIAMILL TEST) • MEDIA FILL PROGRAM SHOULD INCLUDE WORST CASE ACTIVITIES • FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH LONGEST PERMITTED RUN (E.G. OPERATOR FATIGUE) • REPRESENTATIVE NUMBER, TYPE, AND COMPLEXITY OF NORMAL INTERVENTIONS, NON-ROUTINE INTERVENTIONS AND EVENTS (E.G. MAINTENANCE, ELECTRIC SHUT DOWN, PERSONAL INTRUSION ETC) • NO OF PERSONNEL & THEIR ACTIVITIES, SHIFT CHANGES, BREAKS, GOWN CHANGES • REPRESENTATIVE NUMBER OF ASEPTIC ADDITIONS (E.G. CHARGING CONTAINERS, CLOSURES, STERILE INGREDIENTS) OR TRANSFERS • ASEPTIC EQUIPMENT CONNECTIONS/DISCONNECTIONS • ASEPTIC SAMPLE COLLECTIONS • LINE SPEED AND CONFIGURATION • WEIGHT CHECKS • CONTAINER CLOSURE SYSTEMS • WRITTEN BATCH RECORD DOCUMENTING CONDITIONS AND ACTIVITIES 27 ASEPTIC PROCESSING Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 28.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING DURATION • DEPENDSON TYPE OF OPERATION • PROCESSES - SUFFICIENT TIME TO INCLUDE MANIPULATIONS AND INTERVENTIONS • FOR CONVENTIONAL OPERATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE THE TOTAL FILLING TIME SIZE • 5000 - 10000 GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE OR BATCH SIZE IF <5000 • FOR MANUALLY INTENSIVE PROCESSES LARGER NUMBERS SHOULD BE FILLED • LOWER NUMBERS CAN BE FILLED FOR ISOLATORS 28 PROCESS VALIDATION (MEDIA FILL TEST ) FREQUENCY AND NUMBER – THREE INITIAL, CONSECUTIVE PER SHIFT – SUBSEQUENTLY SEMI-ANNUAL PER SHIFT AND PROCESS – ALL PERSONNEL SHOULD PARTICIPATE AT LEAST ANNUALLY, CONSISTENT WITH ROUTINE DUTIES – CHANGES SHOULD BE ASSESSED AND REVALIDATION CARRIED OUT AS REQUIRED LINE SPEED – SPEED DEPENDS ON TYPE OF PROCESS Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 29.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING PROCESS VALIDATION(MEDIA FILL TEST) • ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS • REPRESENTATIVE OF ACTUAL PRODUCTION CONDITIONS (NO. OF PERSONNEL, ACTIVITY LEVELS ETC) - NO SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS (NOT INCLUDING ADJUSTMENT OF HVAC) • IF NITROGEN USED FOR OVERLAYING/PURGING NEED TO SUBSTITUTE WITH AIR • MEDIA • ANAEROBIC MEDIA SHOULD BE CONSIDERED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES • SHOULD BE TESTED FOR GROWTH PROMOTING PROPERTIES (INCLUDING FACTORY ISOLATES) 29Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 30.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING PROCESS VALIDATION(MEDIA FILL TEST) • INCUBATION, EXAMINATION • IN THE RANGE 20-35ºC (20-25ºC FOR FUNGAL & 30-35ºC FOR BACTERIA. • IF TWO TEMPERATURES ARE USED, LOWER TEMPERATURE FIRST • INSPECTION BY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL. • ALL INTEGRAL UNITS SHOULD BE INCUBATED. SHOULD BE JUSTIFICATION FOR ANY UNITS NOT INCUBATED. • UNITS REMOVED (AND NOT INCUBATED) SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH ROUTINE PRACTICES (ALTHOUGH INCUBATION WOULD GIVE INFORMATION REGARDING RISK OF INTERVENTION) • BATCH RECONCILIATION 30Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 31.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING PROCESS VALIDATION(MEDIA FILL TEST) • INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS • WHEN FILLING FEWER THAN 5000 UNITS: • NO CONTAMINATED UNITS SHOULD BE DETECTED • ONE (1) CONTAMINATED UNIT IS CONSIDERED CAUSE FOR REVALIDATION, FOLLOWING AN INVESTIGATION • WHEN FILLING FROM 5000-10000 UNITS • ONE (1) CONTAMINATED UNIT SHOULD RESULT IN AN INVESTIGATION, INCLUDING CONSIDERATION OF A REPEAT MEDIA FILL • TWO (2) CONTAMINATED UNITS ARE CONSIDERED CAUSE FOR REVALIDATION, FOLLOWING INVESTIGATION • WHEN FILLING MORE THAN 10000 UNITS • ONE (1) CONTAMINATED UNIT SHOULD RESULT IN AN INVESTIGATION • TWO (2) CONTAMINATED UNITS ARE CONSIDERED CAUSE FOR REVALIDATION, FOLLOWING INVESTIGATION 31Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 32.
    ASEPTIC PROCESSING PROCESS VALIDATION(MEDIA FILL TEST) • INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS • MEDIA FILLS SHOULD BE OBSERVED BY QC AND CONTAMINATED UNITS RECONCILABLE WITH TIME AND ACTIVITY BEING SIMULATED (VIDEO MAY HELP) • IDEALLY - NO CONTAMINATION. ANY CONTAMINATION SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED. • ANY ORGANISMS ISOLATED SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED TO SPECIES LEVEL (GENOTYPIC IDENTIFICATION) • INVALIDATION OF A MEDIA FILL RUN SHOULD BE RARE 32Discussed & Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 33.
    33 CASE STUDY 01 Discussed& Presented By: Muhammad Luqman Ikram
  • 34.
  • 35.