As foundation portfolio marking sheet
•Download as DOC, PDF•
0 likes•138 views
This document outlines a marking sheet for evaluating a video task for a media studies course. It provides criteria for assessing students' work across three categories: research and planning, evaluation, and construction. Within each category, it lists several elements that will be evaluated on a scale from minimal to excellent ability. The marking sheet allows instructors to systematically assign a final mark out of 100 by considering students' performance in all assessed areas.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Foundation Portfolio Mark Sheet Video
This document outlines the marking criteria for a foundation portfolio in media studies. It provides guidance on evaluating three elements: research and planning, construction of the media product, and evaluation. For research and planning, marks are awarded based on the depth of background research, pre-production materials, and time management. Construction is marked on technical skills like shot composition, editing, and use of sound and effects. The evaluation requires addressing questions about audience, representation, and what was learned from creating the project. Candidates are evaluated on their understanding, communication skills, and use of technology in the self-assessment.
G324 marking criteria on 2 pages
This document provides marking criteria for an A2 Media Studies assignment involving the creation of media products. It outlines four levels of achievement for research & planning, evaluation, and the main media task (video, print, radio, or website). For the main task, marks are allocated out of 40. For two ancillary tasks, marks are allocated out of 10 each. Teachers are to consider consistency of brand identity across the pieces and note individual contributions to group work.
G321 marking criteria on 1 page
This document contains criteria for assessing student performance on video, print, audio, and website media production tasks. It evaluates students on research and planning, evaluation of their work, and construction of the media product. Within each category, students are rated on a 4-level scale from minimal to excellent based on criteria such as organization, time management, use of technology, and understanding of audience and conventions.
Marking criteria
This document provides marking criteria for three components of an Advanced Portfolio in Media: research and planning, evaluation, and media texts.
For research and planning, marks are awarded based on the completeness of evidence, depth of research, quality of pre-production materials, time management, technology skills, communication skills, and presentation. Evaluation is assessed on technology use, understanding of forms and audience, reflection on the process, and ability to communicate. Media texts are judged on technical skills, creativity, and individual contributions to group work. Scores range from 0 to 40 marks for each task depending on the level of skills demonstrated.
How to get a top grade in your media cw
This document provides guidelines for students on how to get a top grade in their Media Studies coursework in 2008-2009. It outlines the criteria for the different sections - Research and Planning, Construction, and Evaluation - and what is required to receive an excellent mark in each area. Research and Planning focuses on research into similar products, organization, and use of technology. Construction evaluates technical skills like shot composition and editing. Evaluation examines understanding of conventions, audience feedback, and presentation skills.
Independent evaluation
The document outlines the marking criteria for an evaluation, with the highest level (Level 4) requiring excellent skills in using appropriate digital technology, understanding issues around audience and production, ability to refer to choices made and outcomes, understanding of development from preliminary to full task, and ability to communicate. To get the highest mark, one should use the marking criteria to plan their evaluation and consider approaches to meeting the criteria.
A2 action plan proforma 2017 2018
This document outlines an individual student action plan for a documentary filmmaking course. It includes sections for research and planning, construction, and evaluation. The research and planning section lists topics for the student to research, such as documentary conventions, their target audience, and specific production elements. The construction section involves creating elements like a documentary film extract, double-page magazine spread, and newspaper advertisement. The evaluation section provides questions for the student to address and criteria for assessing their work.
Foundation Portfolio Evaluation
Students must evaluate their media studies foundation portfolio in 3 sentences or less by addressing several key questions. The evaluation can be submitted individually or with a group and must incorporate audience feedback. It will be graded on a scale from 0-20 based on the student's understanding of conventions, media texts, audience feedback, and presentation skills. Higher marks are given for excellent comprehension in these areas and proficient use of technology.
Recommended
Foundation Portfolio Mark Sheet Video
This document outlines the marking criteria for a foundation portfolio in media studies. It provides guidance on evaluating three elements: research and planning, construction of the media product, and evaluation. For research and planning, marks are awarded based on the depth of background research, pre-production materials, and time management. Construction is marked on technical skills like shot composition, editing, and use of sound and effects. The evaluation requires addressing questions about audience, representation, and what was learned from creating the project. Candidates are evaluated on their understanding, communication skills, and use of technology in the self-assessment.
G324 marking criteria on 2 pages
This document provides marking criteria for an A2 Media Studies assignment involving the creation of media products. It outlines four levels of achievement for research & planning, evaluation, and the main media task (video, print, radio, or website). For the main task, marks are allocated out of 40. For two ancillary tasks, marks are allocated out of 10 each. Teachers are to consider consistency of brand identity across the pieces and note individual contributions to group work.
G321 marking criteria on 1 page
This document contains criteria for assessing student performance on video, print, audio, and website media production tasks. It evaluates students on research and planning, evaluation of their work, and construction of the media product. Within each category, students are rated on a 4-level scale from minimal to excellent based on criteria such as organization, time management, use of technology, and understanding of audience and conventions.
Marking criteria
This document provides marking criteria for three components of an Advanced Portfolio in Media: research and planning, evaluation, and media texts.
For research and planning, marks are awarded based on the completeness of evidence, depth of research, quality of pre-production materials, time management, technology skills, communication skills, and presentation. Evaluation is assessed on technology use, understanding of forms and audience, reflection on the process, and ability to communicate. Media texts are judged on technical skills, creativity, and individual contributions to group work. Scores range from 0 to 40 marks for each task depending on the level of skills demonstrated.
How to get a top grade in your media cw
This document provides guidelines for students on how to get a top grade in their Media Studies coursework in 2008-2009. It outlines the criteria for the different sections - Research and Planning, Construction, and Evaluation - and what is required to receive an excellent mark in each area. Research and Planning focuses on research into similar products, organization, and use of technology. Construction evaluates technical skills like shot composition and editing. Evaluation examines understanding of conventions, audience feedback, and presentation skills.
Independent evaluation
The document outlines the marking criteria for an evaluation, with the highest level (Level 4) requiring excellent skills in using appropriate digital technology, understanding issues around audience and production, ability to refer to choices made and outcomes, understanding of development from preliminary to full task, and ability to communicate. To get the highest mark, one should use the marking criteria to plan their evaluation and consider approaches to meeting the criteria.
A2 action plan proforma 2017 2018
This document outlines an individual student action plan for a documentary filmmaking course. It includes sections for research and planning, construction, and evaluation. The research and planning section lists topics for the student to research, such as documentary conventions, their target audience, and specific production elements. The construction section involves creating elements like a documentary film extract, double-page magazine spread, and newspaper advertisement. The evaluation section provides questions for the student to address and criteria for assessing their work.
Foundation Portfolio Evaluation
Students must evaluate their media studies foundation portfolio in 3 sentences or less by addressing several key questions. The evaluation can be submitted individually or with a group and must incorporate audience feedback. It will be graded on a scale from 0-20 based on the student's understanding of conventions, media texts, audience feedback, and presentation skills. Higher marks are given for excellent comprehension in these areas and proficient use of technology.
Pitch assessment copy (1)
Lucy Martin presented her pitch for a targeted grade of D*D*D*. The feedback focused on strengthening her research and planning in key areas. For criteria 1 (informing ideas), the feedback indicated she needs more detailed research on existing products and how she will demonstrate repetition and difference. For criteria 2 (problem solving), she was advised to show drafts, experimentation, and audience testing consistently throughout the project. For criteria 4 (professional practice), establishing a clear schedule was recommended along with demonstrating organization and planning skills. The lecturer liked Lucy's passion for her idea on musical theatre and her clear ideas for locations and interviews but advised focusing first on strengthening her research for criteria 1 before developing her organizational skills further.
OCR AS Media Studies
This document summarizes the structure and requirements of the OCR Advanced Subsidiary GCE in Media Studies. It includes:
- Two units, G321 Foundation Portfolio in Media (coursework) and G322 Key Media Concepts (written exam on TV drama).
- For G321, students complete a preliminary video task and main video production, plus research and evaluation. The main task is 2 minutes and involves original video/audio.
- For G322, Section A involves analyzing technical aspects like camerawork, editing, sound, and mise-en-scene in an unseen TV drama extract. Section B addresses media institutions, audiences, and related concepts.
- Both units assess knowledge
A2 Coursework Outline and Stop Motion Task
This document outlines the marking criteria for an advanced production coursework consisting of a main task, two ancillary tasks, planning, and evaluation. It is awarded as follows:
Main task: 40 marks
Ancillary One: 10 marks
Ancillary Two: 10 marks
Planning: 20 marks
Evaluation: 20 marks
The planning section (20 marks) requires evidence of individual work such as photos, videos or blog posts showing the preliminary tasks, codes and conventions analyzed, and practical skills developed. The evaluation section (20 marks) involves answering four questions about representing forms and conventions, combining the main and ancillary tasks, learning from audience feedback, and using technologies in the construction, planning and
Raybould matthew evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Matthew Raybould received marks in four categories for his A2 coursework:
1) Planning (full comments in separate sheet) - mark out of 12/20
2) Construction of main task (full comments in separate sheet) - mark out of 28/40
3) Construction of ancillary task 1 (Digipak and poster) - Digipak 8/10, poster 10/10
4) Evaluation (detailed comments on four questions) - mark out of 15/20
His total mark was 73 out of 100, earning him a grade of B.
Matthew Lumley Evaluation and Overall Feedback Sheet
Matthew Lumley received a grade of B for his A2 coursework. For his main video task, he demonstrated proficiency in technical skills like camera work, editing, and sound mixing. His ancillary tasks of a digipak and poster also showed proficient creative and technical skills. In his evaluation, Lumley provided very good analysis of how his video conformed to and challenged genre conventions. He gathered useful feedback from audiences and reflected well on how he could improve. Overall, the work demonstrated a great understanding of the tasks and good use of technologies.
A2 evaluation 4 technology
This document provides guidance on evaluating one's use of technology throughout a coursework project. It prompts the student to identify different technologies used in the research, planning, production, and evaluation stages. For each technology, the student should explain what it allowed them to do and the benefits. Examples of technologies include using social media for audience research, creating an animatic for planning, and using video editing software for production and evaluation. The document advises using specific examples and media from the student's own work to support the points made.
As evaluation 6 technology
This document provides evaluation objectives and guidance for students to evaluate their use of technology in producing a magazine. It instructs students to identify the specific technologies used such as cameras, image editing software, and internet resources. Students are asked to explain how each technology was used and what it allowed them to do, providing examples from their magazine. Students are also prompted to reflect on what they have learned about using technology in media production and the skills they have developed. When presenting their response, students should include visual examples and screenshots from their magazine to support their points.
my evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Megan Howden received marks for various components of an A2 coursework project. She received full marks for planning and high marks for her main construction task. Her ancillary tasks involving a digipak and poster showed proficient and basic technical skills respectively. In her evaluation, she provided excellent analysis of how meaning was created in a video and how her products conformed to genre conventions, receiving high marks. Overall, she demonstrated a great understanding of the tasks and received a total mark of 84 out of 100, equating to a grade of A.
Holley, matthew cw feedback
Matthew Holley completed the main A2 coursework task of creating a music video. The video showed excellent camerawork, beautiful shots in color and black and white, and strong long shots of the artist Oscar walking. The edits were good and told a clear story that matched the beat of the music. For the ancillary tasks, Holley designed a digipak with an excellent creative design that clearly fit the genre and artist with strong technical skills. He also created a poster with a proficient design that showed a clear understanding of conventions and technical ability. Overall, Holley received a high level score of 53 out of 60 for his coursework.
Charlotte chamberlain as coursework overall marksheet
Charlotte Chamberlain received excellent marks for her AS coursework. Her planning work showed excellence in additional research and pre-production tasks, earning a full 20/20 marks. Her main construction task showed proficiency in technical skills like editing, camera work, and attention to details, earning 47/60 marks. Her evaluation answered all questions excellently using various technologies like YouTube, Prezi, and PowerPoint, demonstrating a good understanding of the production process and receiving 17/20 marks. Overall, she earned a total of 84/100 marks and achieved a Level 4 Grade A for her AS coursework.
Foundation Portfolio Construction
This document outlines tasks and assessment criteria for print and video media production assignments. For print, students must create a magazine front page and contents page as a preliminary exercise, and then a full magazine spread for the main task. For video, the preliminary task involves filming a short continuity scene, and the main task is to produce opening titles and the opening of a short fiction film. Each assignment is assessed on a scale of 0-60 based on demonstrated technical skills and creative use of those skills. Higher levels of the scale require greater proficiency, excellence, and inclusion of more technical skills. Sample student work is provided for reference.
Elwell rowan evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Rowan Elwell received marks in three categories: Planning (see separate sheet for comments), Construction, and Evaluation. For Construction, they received marks of 34/40 for their main task and 7/10 each for their ancillary tasks of a digipak and poster. The digipak showed proficient skills but repetitive inside images, while the poster fit the genre/band well and showed technical skill. For Evaluation, Rowan analyzed their video's shots/meaning, linked ancillary tasks, and got audience feedback showing task/genre understanding, but lacked reflective comments. Overall it was a proficient piece showing technology/presentation skills and good task understanding. The total marks were 76/100 for a grade of B.
As course details updated animated version[1]
1. The AS Media Studies course consists of two units - Unit G321 and Unit G322.
2. Unit G321 involves creating a short film through filming, editing, and a written analysis. Students film a scene and opening titles for a fiction film under two minutes.
3. Unit G322 focuses on key media concepts like representation, institutions, and audiences. The exam consists of analyzing a TV drama clip and writing about the relationships between a media industry and its audiences.
Introduction to MS2
This document outlines the requirements for a 50% assessment in media studies. It includes three linked pieces of work: a pre-production artifact worth 20% demonstrating research and planning, a production piece worth 40% developed from the pre-production, and a report worth 40% evaluating the process. The pre-production must include research on the target audience and chosen media product/industry. The production applies this research and planning. The report discusses research findings, justifies the target audience, and evaluates strengths and weaknesses of the production compared to other media. Deadlines are provided for each stage.
MS2 guidance 2014
The document provides guidance for students on completing the pre-production and production phases of a media coursework project. It outlines requirements such as conducting research on target audiences and similar existing media, developing initial planning materials, and producing pre-production and production artifacts. Students must also write a production report analyzing their process, research, audience targeting, and evaluating their work. Key terms related to media fields are defined to help students communicate knowledge and understanding.
User Researcher Job Description
The NMTG User Researcher plans, conducts, analyzes and socializes user research and validation activities for Cisco's next generation of network management software applications. They work closely with designers, product managers and engineers to define the user experience based on field research and user testing to ensure customer acceptance. Responsibilities include planning and conducting usability testing and field studies, generating user personas and scenarios, identifying requirements, developing prototypes, and facilitating communication across teams. Qualifications include 5+ years of user research experience, a Bachelor's degree in HCI or related field, strong communication and time management skills, and the ability to convey design solutions.
AS course details
1. The AS Media Studies course consists of two units - Unit G321 and Unit G322.
2. Unit G321 involves coursework including filming and editing tasks to demonstrate techniques as well as a longer fiction film opening.
3. Unit G322 involves exam sections on analyzing representations in TV drama clips and the relationships between a media industry, audiences, and technologies.
Holley matthew evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Matthew Holley received marks for various coursework assignments. He received full marks for planning and high marks for his main construction task and ancillary tasks of designing a digipak and poster. In his evaluation, he provided excellent breakdowns and analyses of how his video conformed to genre conventions and how audience feedback validated his work. Overall, his work showed a great understanding of the tasks and he earned a total mark of 89 out of 100 and a grade of A.
Lead-Interaction-designer
This job posting is seeking a Lead Interaction Designer who will be responsible for producing visualizations of user experience strategies based on the latest interaction design principles for mobile and touch devices. The ideal candidate will have 5-7 years of experience designing consumer-facing ecommerce mobile applications and a design background or related degree. Key responsibilities include planning user research, creating low- and high-fidelity prototypes, collaborating with stakeholders, and having strong presentation skills and an understanding of storytelling. Knowledge of prototyping tools, design software, and mobility concepts is required.
Ms2 evaluation guide
This document provides guidance for writing an evaluation for an MS2 media studies course. It outlines that the evaluation is worth 40% of the total grade and must be between 1200-1600 words. It suggests including sections on outlining the task, discussing pre-production research, the targeted audience, any audience feedback, and evaluating the production's strengths and weaknesses compared to other media. The goal is to provide a framework to reflect on production processes and evaluate one's work.
A2 advanced portfolio marking sheet
Use this sheet to check your progress and ensure you have done all you need in your Advanced Portfolio work.
G321 markingsheet
This document appears to be a marking sheet for a media studies print task assignment. It evaluates students on research and planning, evaluation, and construction of the task. Within each category, students can be ranked between level 1 and 4 based on criteria like the depth of their research, understanding of key issues, and technical skills in using digital tools and conventions like layout, fonts, and shot composition. The marking sheet provides a comprehensive rubric to assess students' work across several dimensions relevant to the print media assignment.
More Related Content
What's hot
Pitch assessment copy (1)
Lucy Martin presented her pitch for a targeted grade of D*D*D*. The feedback focused on strengthening her research and planning in key areas. For criteria 1 (informing ideas), the feedback indicated she needs more detailed research on existing products and how she will demonstrate repetition and difference. For criteria 2 (problem solving), she was advised to show drafts, experimentation, and audience testing consistently throughout the project. For criteria 4 (professional practice), establishing a clear schedule was recommended along with demonstrating organization and planning skills. The lecturer liked Lucy's passion for her idea on musical theatre and her clear ideas for locations and interviews but advised focusing first on strengthening her research for criteria 1 before developing her organizational skills further.
OCR AS Media Studies
This document summarizes the structure and requirements of the OCR Advanced Subsidiary GCE in Media Studies. It includes:
- Two units, G321 Foundation Portfolio in Media (coursework) and G322 Key Media Concepts (written exam on TV drama).
- For G321, students complete a preliminary video task and main video production, plus research and evaluation. The main task is 2 minutes and involves original video/audio.
- For G322, Section A involves analyzing technical aspects like camerawork, editing, sound, and mise-en-scene in an unseen TV drama extract. Section B addresses media institutions, audiences, and related concepts.
- Both units assess knowledge
A2 Coursework Outline and Stop Motion Task
This document outlines the marking criteria for an advanced production coursework consisting of a main task, two ancillary tasks, planning, and evaluation. It is awarded as follows:
Main task: 40 marks
Ancillary One: 10 marks
Ancillary Two: 10 marks
Planning: 20 marks
Evaluation: 20 marks
The planning section (20 marks) requires evidence of individual work such as photos, videos or blog posts showing the preliminary tasks, codes and conventions analyzed, and practical skills developed. The evaluation section (20 marks) involves answering four questions about representing forms and conventions, combining the main and ancillary tasks, learning from audience feedback, and using technologies in the construction, planning and
Raybould matthew evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Matthew Raybould received marks in four categories for his A2 coursework:
1) Planning (full comments in separate sheet) - mark out of 12/20
2) Construction of main task (full comments in separate sheet) - mark out of 28/40
3) Construction of ancillary task 1 (Digipak and poster) - Digipak 8/10, poster 10/10
4) Evaluation (detailed comments on four questions) - mark out of 15/20
His total mark was 73 out of 100, earning him a grade of B.
Matthew Lumley Evaluation and Overall Feedback Sheet
Matthew Lumley received a grade of B for his A2 coursework. For his main video task, he demonstrated proficiency in technical skills like camera work, editing, and sound mixing. His ancillary tasks of a digipak and poster also showed proficient creative and technical skills. In his evaluation, Lumley provided very good analysis of how his video conformed to and challenged genre conventions. He gathered useful feedback from audiences and reflected well on how he could improve. Overall, the work demonstrated a great understanding of the tasks and good use of technologies.
A2 evaluation 4 technology
This document provides guidance on evaluating one's use of technology throughout a coursework project. It prompts the student to identify different technologies used in the research, planning, production, and evaluation stages. For each technology, the student should explain what it allowed them to do and the benefits. Examples of technologies include using social media for audience research, creating an animatic for planning, and using video editing software for production and evaluation. The document advises using specific examples and media from the student's own work to support the points made.
As evaluation 6 technology
This document provides evaluation objectives and guidance for students to evaluate their use of technology in producing a magazine. It instructs students to identify the specific technologies used such as cameras, image editing software, and internet resources. Students are asked to explain how each technology was used and what it allowed them to do, providing examples from their magazine. Students are also prompted to reflect on what they have learned about using technology in media production and the skills they have developed. When presenting their response, students should include visual examples and screenshots from their magazine to support their points.
my evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Megan Howden received marks for various components of an A2 coursework project. She received full marks for planning and high marks for her main construction task. Her ancillary tasks involving a digipak and poster showed proficient and basic technical skills respectively. In her evaluation, she provided excellent analysis of how meaning was created in a video and how her products conformed to genre conventions, receiving high marks. Overall, she demonstrated a great understanding of the tasks and received a total mark of 84 out of 100, equating to a grade of A.
Holley, matthew cw feedback
Matthew Holley completed the main A2 coursework task of creating a music video. The video showed excellent camerawork, beautiful shots in color and black and white, and strong long shots of the artist Oscar walking. The edits were good and told a clear story that matched the beat of the music. For the ancillary tasks, Holley designed a digipak with an excellent creative design that clearly fit the genre and artist with strong technical skills. He also created a poster with a proficient design that showed a clear understanding of conventions and technical ability. Overall, Holley received a high level score of 53 out of 60 for his coursework.
Charlotte chamberlain as coursework overall marksheet
Charlotte Chamberlain received excellent marks for her AS coursework. Her planning work showed excellence in additional research and pre-production tasks, earning a full 20/20 marks. Her main construction task showed proficiency in technical skills like editing, camera work, and attention to details, earning 47/60 marks. Her evaluation answered all questions excellently using various technologies like YouTube, Prezi, and PowerPoint, demonstrating a good understanding of the production process and receiving 17/20 marks. Overall, she earned a total of 84/100 marks and achieved a Level 4 Grade A for her AS coursework.
Foundation Portfolio Construction
This document outlines tasks and assessment criteria for print and video media production assignments. For print, students must create a magazine front page and contents page as a preliminary exercise, and then a full magazine spread for the main task. For video, the preliminary task involves filming a short continuity scene, and the main task is to produce opening titles and the opening of a short fiction film. Each assignment is assessed on a scale of 0-60 based on demonstrated technical skills and creative use of those skills. Higher levels of the scale require greater proficiency, excellence, and inclusion of more technical skills. Sample student work is provided for reference.
Elwell rowan evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Rowan Elwell received marks in three categories: Planning (see separate sheet for comments), Construction, and Evaluation. For Construction, they received marks of 34/40 for their main task and 7/10 each for their ancillary tasks of a digipak and poster. The digipak showed proficient skills but repetitive inside images, while the poster fit the genre/band well and showed technical skill. For Evaluation, Rowan analyzed their video's shots/meaning, linked ancillary tasks, and got audience feedback showing task/genre understanding, but lacked reflective comments. Overall it was a proficient piece showing technology/presentation skills and good task understanding. The total marks were 76/100 for a grade of B.
As course details updated animated version[1]
1. The AS Media Studies course consists of two units - Unit G321 and Unit G322.
2. Unit G321 involves creating a short film through filming, editing, and a written analysis. Students film a scene and opening titles for a fiction film under two minutes.
3. Unit G322 focuses on key media concepts like representation, institutions, and audiences. The exam consists of analyzing a TV drama clip and writing about the relationships between a media industry and its audiences.
Introduction to MS2
This document outlines the requirements for a 50% assessment in media studies. It includes three linked pieces of work: a pre-production artifact worth 20% demonstrating research and planning, a production piece worth 40% developed from the pre-production, and a report worth 40% evaluating the process. The pre-production must include research on the target audience and chosen media product/industry. The production applies this research and planning. The report discusses research findings, justifies the target audience, and evaluates strengths and weaknesses of the production compared to other media. Deadlines are provided for each stage.
MS2 guidance 2014
The document provides guidance for students on completing the pre-production and production phases of a media coursework project. It outlines requirements such as conducting research on target audiences and similar existing media, developing initial planning materials, and producing pre-production and production artifacts. Students must also write a production report analyzing their process, research, audience targeting, and evaluating their work. Key terms related to media fields are defined to help students communicate knowledge and understanding.
User Researcher Job Description
The NMTG User Researcher plans, conducts, analyzes and socializes user research and validation activities for Cisco's next generation of network management software applications. They work closely with designers, product managers and engineers to define the user experience based on field research and user testing to ensure customer acceptance. Responsibilities include planning and conducting usability testing and field studies, generating user personas and scenarios, identifying requirements, developing prototypes, and facilitating communication across teams. Qualifications include 5+ years of user research experience, a Bachelor's degree in HCI or related field, strong communication and time management skills, and the ability to convey design solutions.
AS course details
1. The AS Media Studies course consists of two units - Unit G321 and Unit G322.
2. Unit G321 involves coursework including filming and editing tasks to demonstrate techniques as well as a longer fiction film opening.
3. Unit G322 involves exam sections on analyzing representations in TV drama clips and the relationships between a media industry, audiences, and technologies.
Holley matthew evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Matthew Holley received marks for various coursework assignments. He received full marks for planning and high marks for his main construction task and ancillary tasks of designing a digipak and poster. In his evaluation, he provided excellent breakdowns and analyses of how his video conformed to genre conventions and how audience feedback validated his work. Overall, his work showed a great understanding of the tasks and he earned a total mark of 89 out of 100 and a grade of A.
Lead-Interaction-designer
This job posting is seeking a Lead Interaction Designer who will be responsible for producing visualizations of user experience strategies based on the latest interaction design principles for mobile and touch devices. The ideal candidate will have 5-7 years of experience designing consumer-facing ecommerce mobile applications and a design background or related degree. Key responsibilities include planning user research, creating low- and high-fidelity prototypes, collaborating with stakeholders, and having strong presentation skills and an understanding of storytelling. Knowledge of prototyping tools, design software, and mobility concepts is required.
Ms2 evaluation guide
This document provides guidance for writing an evaluation for an MS2 media studies course. It outlines that the evaluation is worth 40% of the total grade and must be between 1200-1600 words. It suggests including sections on outlining the task, discussing pre-production research, the targeted audience, any audience feedback, and evaluating the production's strengths and weaknesses compared to other media. The goal is to provide a framework to reflect on production processes and evaluate one's work.
What's hot (20)
Raybould matthew evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Raybould matthew evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Matthew Lumley Evaluation and Overall Feedback Sheet
Matthew Lumley Evaluation and Overall Feedback Sheet
Charlotte chamberlain as coursework overall marksheet
Charlotte chamberlain as coursework overall marksheet
Elwell rowan evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Elwell rowan evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Holley matthew evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Holley matthew evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Similar to As foundation portfolio marking sheet
A2 advanced portfolio marking sheet
Use this sheet to check your progress and ensure you have done all you need in your Advanced Portfolio work.
G321 markingsheet
This document appears to be a marking sheet for a media studies print task assignment. It evaluates students on research and planning, evaluation, and construction of the task. Within each category, students can be ranked between level 1 and 4 based on criteria like the depth of their research, understanding of key issues, and technical skills in using digital tools and conventions like layout, fonts, and shot composition. The marking sheet provides a comprehensive rubric to assess students' work across several dimensions relevant to the print media assignment.
Title project marking
The document outlines criteria for evaluating two parts of a title project: the planning and research, and the video.
For the planning section, there are four levels of achievement based on evidence of creative use of areas like research, storyboarding, time management, and presentation skills.
For the video, there are also four levels evaluated on appropriately producing material for the audience, using titles and sound editing, shooting with camera skills, and effective editing to convey meaning. Both sections have the highest level reflecting excellence in most criteria.
A2 levels
This document outlines the grading criteria for film/video projects on four levels from minimal ability to excellence. A level 4 grade requires excellence in technical skills like shooting appropriate footage, effective editing, sound design, and group contributions. Level 3 requires proficiency, level 2 requires basic skills, and level 1 requires minimal ability in these areas. Evaluation and ancillary tasks are also graded on a level 4 scale requiring excellence in skills such as technology use, conventions, audience feedback, and presentation ability. Research and planning grades similarly require excellence in thoroughness, target audience research, pre-production materials, organization, time management, technology skills, communication, and presentation quality.
B321 level ladder posters
This document outlines the criteria for grading film posters from levels 1 through 4 on a scale of 1-40. It evaluates posters on four elements: Photoshop skills, use of media language, understanding of codes and conventions, and targeting of an audience. Higher levels are expected to demonstrate more advanced Photoshop skills, incorporate more elements of media language into the representation, show a clearer understanding and more creative use of horror poster conventions, and have a stronger sense that a specific audience is being targeted. The document is intended to guide assessment of film posters by teachers, peers, and self-assessment.
As production mark sheet video[1]
This document outlines the marking criteria for a foundation portfolio in media studies. It provides guidance on evaluating three elements: research and planning, construction of the media product, and evaluation. For research and planning, marks are awarded based on the depth of background research, pre-production materials, and time management. Construction is marked on technical skills like shot composition, editing, sound use, and meeting the specified task. The evaluation requires addressing questions on representation, audience, and learned skills, and incorporating feedback. Marks are awarded on a scale from 1-4 in each category, with total marks out of 100.
Marking Criteria For Music Video
This document provides marking criteria for different elements of a media production unit, including research and planning, evaluation, and the media text itself. It establishes four levels for each element based on the quality of work. For research and planning, higher levels require more thorough research, organization, and digital presentation skills. The evaluation is assessed based on understanding of production elements, audience feedback, and use of new media technologies. The media text is marked based on technical skills and, for group projects, individual contributions. Higher levels denote greater abilities.
Marking Criteria For Evaluation
This document outlines marking criteria for evaluating creative works and music videos. It establishes four levels for scoring works, with level 1 being minimal understanding/ability and level 4 being excellent. Each higher level represents greater proficiency in areas like understanding conventions, use of new media, audience feedback, communication skills, and use of technology. The criteria also establish point ranges and expectations for technical skills in a music video, such as shot composition, editing, and use of sound, with higher levels demonstrating more advanced creative application of these skills.
Pitch presentation
You have been given the opportunity to pitch your fiction film project to a media company looking to invest in new talent. Your presentation must include: research on similar products and target audience profiling; a summary of the plot, characters, and production elements; and evidence of your individual work and planning through a production log. You aim to creatively communicate your vision for the project and demonstrate your skills as a communication specialist to secure funding from the investors.
Reminder of marking scheme
This document provides a marking scheme for an Advanced Portfolio in Media Studies. It outlines four levels for both the Research and Planning and Production components. For Research and Planning, level 4 is for excellent work with well-researched target audiences, organized production elements, and excellent time management and presentation skills. For Production, level 4 is for excellence in technical skills like steady shots, framing, shot variety, appropriate content, effective editing, and selective use of effects and sound. It also notes excellent group contributions will be considered at level 4.
Year 11 coursework evaluation guidance
This document outlines the assessment criteria for a GCSE Media Studies coursework project on creating a music promotional package. It describes four levels of achievement for the research and planning, production, and evaluation phases of the project. For each phase, higher levels of achievement are associated with greater depth and excellence of research, organization, technical skills, and reflective analysis. Guidelines are provided for a production log and evaluation to document the process.
Marking criteria for unit g324
This document outlines the marking criteria for research and planning, as well as the production of media texts, for a music video assignment. It provides descriptors for levels 1 through 4 in each area. For research and planning, it addresses the completeness of planning, research quality, and use of technology. For production, it focuses on skills like camerawork, editing, sound, and group contributions. The highest levels emphasize excellence, professionalism, and polished work.
G324 advanced portfolio briefs and assessment criteria
The Advanced Portfolio is a coursework unit worth 100 marks, comprising 50% of the A2 Media Studies course and 25% of the overall A Level. Students can choose from one of three briefs involving creating promotional materials for a music album, film, or local newspaper. The main task such as a music video or trailer can be completed in groups, while ancillary tasks like advertisements or posters must be done individually. Research and planning is worth 20 marks, construction of the main task 40 marks, and each ancillary task 10 marks. Evaluation is worth 20 marks. The deadline to complete the coursework is December 21st.
G324 advanced portfolio briefs and assessment criteria
The Advanced Portfolio is a coursework unit worth 100 marks, comprising 50% of the A2 Media Studies course and 25% of the overall A Level. Students can choose from one of three briefs involving creating promotional materials for a music album, film, or local newspaper. The main task such as a music video can be completed in groups, while ancillary tasks like advertisements must be done individually. Research and planning is worth 20 marks, construction of the main task 40 marks, and each ancillary task 10 marks. Evaluation is worth 20 marks. The deadline to complete the coursework is December 21st.
Main task
The document discusses planning and evaluating the target audience for a short film opening. It notes that the main task is to create original video and audio for a film opening of up to two minutes. Research into similar products and target audiences is important, as is shot lists, scripting, organization, and use of technology. The target audience is crucial to determine appropriate content and style. Teenagers and young adults are identified as the target audience based on their preferences for thrillers, horrors and comedies. Location scouting in London is mentioned.
A/S Media Foundation Production Assessment Criteria
This document provides assessment criteria and evaluation advice for a film opening title sequence project. It is assessed in three areas: research and planning, production, and evaluation.
Research and planning (20 marks) involves researching similar title sequences, planning shots and storyboards. Production (60 marks) covers technical skills like shot composition, editing, and sound design. Evaluation (20 marks) requires reflecting on audience feedback, forms and conventions, and what was learned. Work is judged on levels from minimal to excellent understanding and skill.
As production mark sheet video
This document outlines the marking criteria for three parts of a media portfolio: research and planning, construction, and evaluation. For research and planning, candidates can submit electronic or physical materials showing their preliminary work. Construction refers to the main media product, which should show progression from any preliminary tasks. Evaluation must include audience feedback and address questions about the media product's form, audience, and what the candidate learned. Marks are awarded on a scale of four levels - Minimal, Basic, Proficient, and Excellent. The portfolio will receive an overall mark out of 100.
JYOTHIRESUME
The candidate is seeking a Software Testing Engineer position to utilize their skills in testing software for user flaws. They have experience in the Software Development and Testing Life Cycles. Their skills include manual testing, test management using QC, and experience with Agile methodologies. They have a BTech in Electronics and Communication and skills in Java, Selenium, and MATLAB.
G321 Marking Criteria
This document outlines the marking criteria for a media foundation portfolio assignment. It is divided into 3 sections: 1) Research and Planning, 2) Construction, and 3) Evaluation. For each section, it describes the levels of achievement from Minimal to Excellent and the criteria for each level. The criteria address aspects of the assignment like quality of research, organization, technical skills, audience feedback, and ability to discuss lessons learned. Students will be marked on their ability to complete the different stages of production, address key questions in their evaluation, and demonstrate their progression overall.
A2 assessment criteria eval qs - q1a-1b topics
This document outlines the criteria for assessing a promotional media package for an album release. It includes a music video and choice of a CD/DVD cover or magazine advertisement. Students will be evaluated on research and planning (20%), production (60%), and evaluation (20%). The production consists of a music video (40% of marks), CD/DVD cover (10% of marks), and magazine ad (10% of marks). Students must address evaluation questions on conventions, effectiveness of texts, audience feedback, and use of technology. They should analyze their work based on specific production practices and media concepts. Marks will be given based on minimal, basic, proficient, or excellent work as defined by research thoroughness, understanding of
Similar to As foundation portfolio marking sheet (20)
G324 advanced portfolio briefs and assessment criteria
G324 advanced portfolio briefs and assessment criteria
G324 advanced portfolio briefs and assessment criteria
G324 advanced portfolio briefs and assessment criteria
A/S Media Foundation Production Assessment Criteria
A/S Media Foundation Production Assessment Criteria
More from stmarysmediastudies
Starting Up With Sport
This magazine contains articles about various sports and athletes. It includes summaries of Ellie Simmonds' swimming career, an article about gymnast Katelyn Ohashi, and pieces on famous runners Mo Farah and Usain Bolt. There are also posters, competitions, and stories from readers. The magazine covers a wide variety of sports from athletics to ice skating.
Official teen fashion magazine uk
This document provides fashion and beauty tips for summer, including how to recreate celebrity looks on a budget. It discusses recreating Karlie Kloss's flower look in 3 steps using artificial flowers and thigh high boots. It also provides tips for festival fashion, including wearing bandanas, glasses, tassels, and mesh clothing. Affordable options are presented for looks inspired by celebrities like Kim Kardashian and Hailey Bieber.
Bazar Teens
Kylie Jenner discussed how social media comments affect her everyday life and how she feels God put her in her position to handle the millions of opinions she receives daily, even if some are hurtful. She also shared that if social media did not exist for a day, she would love to just put her phone away and live in the moment. Kylie expressed that becoming a beauty billionaire and the youngest self-made billionaire in history from Kylie Cosmetics was something she never thought could happen despite believing in her company.
Y7 gothic horror
A girl begins singing a melancholy folk song in a café. Jay is playing with an app on his phone that allows spirit communication via a Ouija board. The app malfunctions and the lights in the café begin flickering along with Jay's phone. The lights then go out completely, plunging the café into darkness. When the planchette on Jay's phone counts down to zero, a woman in the café screams.
Year 7 Magazine Bazar Teens
Kylie Jenner was interviewed about how she handles the constant commentary on social media about her life, saying that while it sometimes gets to her, she feels that God put her in this position to be able to handle it. She also said that if social media did not exist for a day, she would love to just put her phone away and live in the moment. The interview also discussed how becoming a beauty billionaire through Kylie Cosmetics at a young age feels surreal to Kylie as she never thought this level of success could happen.
Why teachers and students should blog
Teachers and students should blog for a variety of 18 reasons including developing creativity, social skills, confidence, digital citizenship, ICT skills, higher-order thinking, reflections, building classroom community, authentic learning experiences, giving students a voice, being more purposeful and productive, and making global connections. Blogging can benefit all subjects and help strengthen home-school connections.
Media studies year 12 exam
This document provides instructions for a Year 12 Media Studies examination. It outlines that the exam is 2 hours long and consists of 4 questions worth a total of 70 marks. Question 1 is worth 15 marks and asks students to discuss technological convergence in relation to The Jungle Book films from 1967 and 2016. Question 2 is also worth 15 marks and requires an analysis of intertextuality on the front cover of The Big Issue magazine. Question 3 is the longest question worth 30 marks and requires students to discuss representations in long form television dramas from two different lists for national and international audiences. Question 4 is worth 10 marks and asks students to evaluate the relevance of Neale's genre theory to long form television drama.
Ucas parents-evening-presentation-2018
The document provides information for parents about the university application process through UCAS. It explains what UCAS is, the benefits of higher education, and how the school supports students through the application process. This includes helping students complete their UCAS form, draft a personal statement, and attend open days and mock interviews. Key deadlines are outlined as well as the options after receiving decisions, such as confirming an offer as a firm or insurance choice. Financial support through tuition fee and maintenance loans is also summarized.
Ucas parents-evening-presentation-2017
The document provides information for parents about the university application process through UCAS. It explains that UCAS processes applications for undergraduate courses in the UK, including degrees, apprenticeships, and study abroad programs. Students can apply to up to 5 choices and will receive either unconditional offers, conditional offers, or may be rejected. The personal statement is important for standing out, and students should focus on extracurriculars and work experience. Parents are encouraged to support their child through open days, application drafting, and by staying informed on deadlines and options if no offers are received initially. Financial support and apprenticeship options are also summarized.
'Romeo and Juliet' key quotations table
The document summarizes key themes and techniques in Romeo and Juliet through quotations and analysis. The main themes discussed are:
1. Love is portrayed as a complex emotion that ultimately destroys Romeo and Juliet despite their families' hatred. Dynamic verbs and oxymorons like "loving hate" show love's complexity.
2. Fate vs free will is central, from the "star-crossed lovers" introduction to Romeo defying the stars. Symbolism of stars represents their destiny.
3. Friendship and enemies are explored through Juliet asking Romeo to reject his family and Romeo "feasting with mine enemy." Their love is stronger than family rivalry.
4
Magazines and gender
This document summarizes key points about how magazines represent gender to readers. It discusses how magazines aim to sell readers to advertisers by creating a sense of belonging based on reinforced gender codes. It analyzes the magazine "Men's Health" and identifies common discourses around quick fixes, male narcissism and anxiety, new male sensitivity, and male superiority. It also discusses theoretical perspectives on how magazines encourage readers to see themselves through an idealized lens defined by masculine culture, distracting from social inequalities. Finally, it presents a contrasting view that readers can selectively construct their identities from media rather than passively internalizing representations.
A2 Collective Identity Essay Plan - representation of women in the media
Plan prepared for a wall display on the A2 Collective Identity exam question 'The media do not construct reality, they merely offer a window on the world.' This is based on case studies of the representation of women in the media.
'Romeo & Juliet' Top Quotations and Themes
This document lists the top 10 techniques and top 4 themes found in Shakespeare's play "Romeo and Juliet". The techniques include metaphor, oxymoron, simile, dynamic verbs, evocative adjectives, powerful noun phrases, significant parallels, clear juxtaposition, foreshadowing, and dramatic irony. The top 4 themes are love, fate and free will, friendship and enemies, and families.
Social historical context of romeo and juliet
Romeo and Juliet is set in 16th century Verona, Italy during the Renaissance. The play is based on a real Italian story from the 3rd century involving the Capulet and Montague families. Shakespeare wrote the version in 1594 based on Arthur Brooke's poem from 1562. Society in Renaissance times was very different than today - marriages were often arranged, women had few rights, and children were seen as property that could be given for political or financial gain. Juliet, as a girl of this time, would have had little freedom or agency over her own life.
Neutral tones plastic notesheet
This document provides analysis of Thomas Hardy's poem "Neutral Tones" through discussion of its poetic devices, imagery, tone, and historical context. It summarizes that the poem depicts a bitter breakup between former lovers through gray, lifeless imagery and a detached yet profound tone of depression. The analysis explores how techniques like rhyme, punctuation, and juxtaposition convey the emotional breakdown and fleeting nature of the relationship. It also briefly situates the poem in Hardy's body of work and perspective on life influenced by his experiences.
Winter Swans plastic_notesheet
This document provides analysis of the poem "Winter Swans" by Owen Sheers. It examines various poetic devices, imagery, structure, tone, and context. The analysis suggests the poem depicts a complicated relationship between a couple that has weathered difficulties but is now reconciled, as represented by the swans swimming together in winter. Imagery of water, clouds, and hands mirror the depth and turmoil and later calm of the relationship. The structure moves from a sense of isolation to cooperation, paralleling the narrative arc of the couple's relationship.
When we two_parted_plastic_notesheet
This document provides an analysis of the poem "When We Two Parted" by Lord Byron. It examines the poetic devices used and their effects, including the dramatic monologue form, alliteration, rhyme, and imagery. The analysis pays particular attention to how these devices create a sense of gloom, pain, isolation, and betrayal in the narrator as he reflects on the end of a secret love affair. Context is also provided on Byron's life and the possible inspiration for the poem in his own love affair with a married woman.
Walking away plastic_notesheet
The document provides an analysis of the poem "Walking Away" by Cecil Day-Lewis. It summarizes the poetic devices used, including its regular five-line stanzas and rhyme scheme. The analysis notes that the dramatic monologue form conveys the hurt of a parent watching their child grow up and leave. Key themes of growing up and the natural process of children separating from their parents are reflected through semantic fields of nature. The shifting tones and imagery, from an upbeat beginning to a more painful reflection on life's challenges, are discussed in relation to the poem's structure and the perspective of the speaking voice.
Sonnet 29 -_I_think_of_thee_plastic
The document provides an analysis of the poetic techniques and themes in Sonnet 29. It examines the sonnet's form, rhyme, rhythm, imagery, tone, and context. The analysis suggests the poem depicts the speaker's thoughts slowly merging with her lover's through a staccato rhythm and caesura. It explores how the imagery of vines growing and wrapping around the lover represents the increasing closeness and intertwining of their identities until they become one.
Singh song plastic_notesheet
1) The poem explores themes of cultural identity and belonging through the voice of a shopkeeper with an Indian background married to a strong-willed wife.
2) It uses elements of Punjabi-influenced English to represent the speaker's experience of straddling two cultures. Imagery celebrates the romance between the speaker and his wife despite pressures from their different cultural backgrounds.
3) The author, Singh, frequently writes about the experience of British Indians and attempts to represent their community's experiences through English language poetry that incorporates aspects of their native languages.
More from stmarysmediastudies (20)
A2 Collective Identity Essay Plan - representation of women in the media
A2 Collective Identity Essay Plan - representation of women in the media
Recently uploaded
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Event Link:- https://meetups.mulesoft.com/events/details/mulesoft-mysore-presents-mule-event-processing-models/
Agenda
● What is event processing in MuleSoft?
● Types of event processing models in Mule 4
● Distinction between the reactive, parallel, blocking & non-blocking processing
For Upcoming Meetups Join Mysore Meetup Group - https://meetups.mulesoft.com/mysore/YouTube:- youtube.com/@mulesoftmysore
Mysore WhatsApp group:- https://chat.whatsapp.com/EhqtHtCC75vCAX7gaO842N
Speaker:-
Shivani Yasaswi - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shivaniyasaswi/
Organizers:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Giridhar Meka - https://www.linkedin.com/in/giridharmeka
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N Roll Records presentation by Izzy Vazquez for Music Retail and Distribution class at Full Sail University
Stack Memory Organization of 8086 Microprocessor
The stack memory organization of 8086 microprocessor.
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
IT WILL BE HELPFULL FOR THE NUSING STUDENTS
IT FOCUSED ON MEDICAL MANAGEMENT AND NURSING MANAGEMENT.
HIGHLIGHTS ON HEALTH EDUCATION.
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as discipline
Benner "Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers"
This presentation was provided by Rebecca Benner, Ph.D., of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
Recently uploaded (20)
Juneteenth Freedom Day 2024 David Douglas School District
Juneteenth Freedom Day 2024 David Douglas School District
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
Traditional Musical Instruments of Arunachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh - RAYH...
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
As foundation portfolio marking sheet
- 1. AS Media Studies - G321: Foundation Portfolio in Media Marking Sheet – Video Task Candidate __________________________________________________ Final mark/100 _____________ RESEARCH & PLANNING LEVEL 1 (0-7) LEVEL 2 (8-11) LEVEL 3 (12-15) LEVEL 4 (16-20) Low High Low High Low High Low High Research into similar products and a potential target audience Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent Organisation of actors, locations, costumes or props Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent Work on shotlists, layouts, drafting, scripting, storyboarding Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent Care in presentation of research and planning Minimal Basic level Good level Excellent level Time management Very poor Not good Good Excellent Contribution (where relevant) Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent EVALUATION LEVEL 1 (0-7) LEVEL 2 (8-11) LEVEL 3 (12-15) LEVEL 4 (16-20) Low High Low High Low High Low High Understanding of issues around audience, institution, technology, representation, forms and conventions in relation to production Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent Ability to refer to choices made and outcomes Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent Understanding of development from preliminary to full task Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent Ability to communicate Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent Skill in use of digital technology/ICT in evaluation Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent Contribution (where relevant) Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent CONSTRUCTION LEVEL 1 (0-23) in any LEVEL 2 (24-35) in some LEVEL 3 (36-47) in many LEVEL 4 (48-60) in most (creative use of technical skills) Low High Low High Low High Low High Holding shot steady Minimal evidence Basic ability Proficient Excellent Framing shot appropriately Minimal evidence Basic ability Proficient Excellent Variety of shot distances Minimal evidence Basic ability Proficient Excellent Appropriate material for task Minimal evidence Basic ability Proficient Excellent Selecting mise-en-scène Minimal evidence Basic ability Proficient Excellent Editing for meaning to viewer Minimal evidence Basic ability Proficient Excellent Varied shot transitions, captions and other effects Minimal evidence Basic ability Proficient Excellent Use of sound with images/editing Minimal evidence Basic ability Proficient Excellent Using titles appropriately Minimal evidence Basic ability Proficient Excellent Contribution (where relevant) Minimal Basic Proficient Excellent