The document discusses the ongoing legal battles between Apple and Samsung over allegations of design patent infringement. It provides details of lawsuits filed in California where Apple was awarded $1.05 billion over Samsung infringing on various patents. However, the disputes are still ongoing with both companies filing additional lawsuits against each other's newer products in multiple countries. Most experts believe this conflict will continue for years through appeals and additional cases without a clear victor emerging.
This presentation is my Final Presentation in Business Law Class in Sampoerna University. The presentation is about Apple vs. Samsung that fight in court to maintain their design patents.
Slide: PowerPoint 2013
Design by: Hedi Fauzi
Image: Freepik (mostly)
If you need the original file for your reference, you can ask me via email: hedi.fauzi@hotmail.com with Subject [SlideShare] (Your Subject)
It discusses about the Patents Act, 1970, and the purpose of a patent. It also goes through the case of Apple Vs Samsung and the judgement given by the court.
This presentation is my Final Presentation in Business Law Class in Sampoerna University. The presentation is about Apple vs. Samsung that fight in court to maintain their design patents.
Slide: PowerPoint 2013
Design by: Hedi Fauzi
Image: Freepik (mostly)
If you need the original file for your reference, you can ask me via email: hedi.fauzi@hotmail.com with Subject [SlideShare] (Your Subject)
It discusses about the Patents Act, 1970, and the purpose of a patent. It also goes through the case of Apple Vs Samsung and the judgement given by the court.
Design Thinking and Innovation at Apple IncSHREYANSH VATS
The following presentation is based on a case on Apple Inc about how Apple goes about implementing innovation and design thinking at their firm, and how there's a shift with the arrival of Tim Cook. The case was a part of our course called BusinessInnovation in New Environment (BINE)
Company Profile
Main Competitors by Business Fields
Sales Mix of Apple Core Products
Market Share by Tablet & Smartphone Vendors
Business Model Canvas
SWOT-Analysis
Porter's five forces on APPLE
Strategy Integration Model
Key to Success
A comparative study between Apple and SamsungVivek Shah
The Apple brand and logo are currently more recognized around the Western world, and in London and New York, you cannot walk down the street without seeing a sea of white headphones and people playing with their iPhones. The Brand Finance Global 500 2013 puts Apple and Samsung right at the very top of the best brands in the world, ahead of Coca-Cola and Google.
Samsung smartphones are broadly comparable, feature-for-feature, with competitors like HTC, Sony, LG and now Nokia, so why has it become so dominant? A big part of the answer lies in its sheer marketing muscle – Samsung spends a bigger chunk of its annual revenue on advertising and promotion than any other of the world's top-20 companies by sales – 5.4%, according to Thomson Reuters data. Apple spends just 0.6%, and General Motors 3.5%.
Adverts mocking Apple fans, and heavy investment in product placement and in distribution channels have strengthened its Galaxy mobile brand. Samsung now sells one in every three smartphones and has more than double Apple’s market share.
Moon Ji-hun, head of brand consultant Interbrand's Korean operation, adds: “When your brand doesn't have a clear identity, as is the case with Samsung, to keep spending is probably the best strategy. But maintaining marketing spend at that level in the longer term wouldn't bring much more benefit. No one can beat Samsung in terms of ad presence, and I doubt whether keeping investing at this level is effective.”
Apple may sit in top position now, but has lost its mojo over the last couple of years through lackluster product releases and perceived lack of innovation. Samsung is catching up and is already no. 2. The Samsung brand can be improved and it isn’t loved by some like Apple, but I am impressed with the leadership team for seizing the opportunity to leapfrog all its other competitors, through investment and execution with conviction.
Design Thinking and Innovation at Apple IncSHREYANSH VATS
The following presentation is based on a case on Apple Inc about how Apple goes about implementing innovation and design thinking at their firm, and how there's a shift with the arrival of Tim Cook. The case was a part of our course called BusinessInnovation in New Environment (BINE)
Company Profile
Main Competitors by Business Fields
Sales Mix of Apple Core Products
Market Share by Tablet & Smartphone Vendors
Business Model Canvas
SWOT-Analysis
Porter's five forces on APPLE
Strategy Integration Model
Key to Success
A comparative study between Apple and SamsungVivek Shah
The Apple brand and logo are currently more recognized around the Western world, and in London and New York, you cannot walk down the street without seeing a sea of white headphones and people playing with their iPhones. The Brand Finance Global 500 2013 puts Apple and Samsung right at the very top of the best brands in the world, ahead of Coca-Cola and Google.
Samsung smartphones are broadly comparable, feature-for-feature, with competitors like HTC, Sony, LG and now Nokia, so why has it become so dominant? A big part of the answer lies in its sheer marketing muscle – Samsung spends a bigger chunk of its annual revenue on advertising and promotion than any other of the world's top-20 companies by sales – 5.4%, according to Thomson Reuters data. Apple spends just 0.6%, and General Motors 3.5%.
Adverts mocking Apple fans, and heavy investment in product placement and in distribution channels have strengthened its Galaxy mobile brand. Samsung now sells one in every three smartphones and has more than double Apple’s market share.
Moon Ji-hun, head of brand consultant Interbrand's Korean operation, adds: “When your brand doesn't have a clear identity, as is the case with Samsung, to keep spending is probably the best strategy. But maintaining marketing spend at that level in the longer term wouldn't bring much more benefit. No one can beat Samsung in terms of ad presence, and I doubt whether keeping investing at this level is effective.”
Apple may sit in top position now, but has lost its mojo over the last couple of years through lackluster product releases and perceived lack of innovation. Samsung is catching up and is already no. 2. The Samsung brand can be improved and it isn’t loved by some like Apple, but I am impressed with the leadership team for seizing the opportunity to leapfrog all its other competitors, through investment and execution with conviction.
Samsung competition to Apple, Sony to NokiaSimplify360
The Consumer Electronics industry is highly dynamic and fast-changing, fueled by rapid innovations and technological changes. Market research shows that the top ten players contribute to approximately 52% of the total market size. The industry has seen the rise and fall of many companies.
This report is an analysis to understand where SONY stands compared to SAMSUNG and identify the trends between the two brands. The product categories which we will be looking at are smart-phones and tablets.
For my final, capstone marketing class, marketing strategies, my team and I were confronted with the challenge of developing a marketing plan for a specific industry, and a company within that industry. We chose the smartphone industry, and within that, the company Samsung. After thorough research, we presented a marketing plan to evaluate their marketing mix moving forward.
Chapter Title Patent War Today Apple vs. Samsung Book T.docxspoonerneddy
Chapter Title: Patent War Today: Apple vs. Samsung
Book Title: Examining the Role of Patent Quality in Large-Scale "Patent War" Litigation
Book Subtitle: A Historical Comparison and Proposal for a Restorative U.S. Patent
System
Book Author(s): Wael Zohni
Published by: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/j.ctv941rps.9
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Examining the Role of Patent Quality in Large-Scale "Patent War" Litigation
This content downloaded from
�������������99.51.230.69 on Wed, 27 May 2020 23:33:14 UTC��������������
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
http://www.jstor.com/stable/j.ctv941rps.9
Patent War Today: Apple vs. Samsung
Apple’s iPhone 3 disrupted the cell phone market in 2007. It brought a
new touchscreen-driven user interface that made integration of features
and navigating utilities on a mobile communication and computing device
much easier than ever before. The series of Apple vs. Samsung cases be‐
ginning in 2010 represent the start of the “Smartphone Wars.” Although
many companies later became involved in associated litigation, this case
was the central conflict, taking on a scale that stretched over several coun‐
tries and jurisdictions. The narrative on these two companies and their le‐
gal confrontation has been the topic of films and popular periodicals.56
Background
iPhone vs. Galaxy
Top secret efforts on the iPhone began at Apple in 2004. Internal product
teams had proposed the concept of a mobile phone with integrated com‐
puting in prior years, but Apple CEO Steve Jobs had been reluctant to
move ahead due to apprehensions with existing market competition and
dependence on third party cellular service companies. He also had techni‐
cal concerns with achieving adequate internet connectivity on a mobile
handset. A major shift in attitude occurred after Apple design director
Jony Ive produced impressive smartphone mock-up units that showcased
the “multi-touch glass” concept.57 The company then moved ahead with
smarthphone development.
By January 2007 Jobs announced the new iPhone product at the annual
MacWorld show in San Francisco, CA. The cell phone establishment did
not think the iP.
Chapter Title Patent War Today Apple vs. Samsung Book T.docxtiffanyd4
Chapter Title: Patent War Today: Apple vs. Samsung
Book Title: Examining the Role of Patent Quality in Large-Scale "Patent War" Litigation
Book Subtitle: A Historical Comparison and Proposal for a Restorative U.S. Patent
System
Book Author(s): Wael Zohni
Published by: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/j.ctv941rps.9
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Examining the Role of Patent Quality in Large-Scale "Patent War" Litigation
This content downloaded from
�������������99.51.230.69 on Wed, 27 May 2020 23:33:14 UTC��������������
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
http://www.jstor.com/stable/j.ctv941rps.9
Patent War Today: Apple vs. Samsung
Apple’s iPhone 3 disrupted the cell phone market in 2007. It brought a
new touchscreen-driven user interface that made integration of features
and navigating utilities on a mobile communication and computing device
much easier than ever before. The series of Apple vs. Samsung cases be‐
ginning in 2010 represent the start of the “Smartphone Wars.” Although
many companies later became involved in associated litigation, this case
was the central conflict, taking on a scale that stretched over several coun‐
tries and jurisdictions. The narrative on these two companies and their le‐
gal confrontation has been the topic of films and popular periodicals.56
Background
iPhone vs. Galaxy
Top secret efforts on the iPhone began at Apple in 2004. Internal product
teams had proposed the concept of a mobile phone with integrated com‐
puting in prior years, but Apple CEO Steve Jobs had been reluctant to
move ahead due to apprehensions with existing market competition and
dependence on third party cellular service companies. He also had techni‐
cal concerns with achieving adequate internet connectivity on a mobile
handset. A major shift in attitude occurred after Apple design director
Jony Ive produced impressive smartphone mock-up units that showcased
the “multi-touch glass” concept.57 The company then moved ahead with
smarthphone development.
By January 2007 Jobs announced the new iPhone product at the annual
MacWorld show in San Francisco, CA. The cell phone establishment did
not think the iP.
Over the past two decades, technology has advanced at an unprecedented pace, leading to a significant increase in the number of patents filed each year. As the number of patents has grown, so has the number of patent disputes and lawsuits. In this article, we will discuss the top 10 patent infringements since 2000.
If you need a patent licensing expert who not only understands the technology, industry, and your specific needs, but also stay with you on each step during monetization process and make sure you get the results crucial for your win, then you are at the right place. Our experts, at Boolean IP, have a total experience of conducting 100+ successful patent infringement identification searches. Clubbing the experience and expertise of our techno-legal experts, and AI-powered tools, Boolean IP provides high quality IP solutions that help you win. Get in touch with your queries.
https://www.booleanip.com/patent-licensee-infringer-identification
#patentinfringements #patentlicenses #patentroyalty #infringements #patentrolls #infringers #patentmonetization #booleanipconsulting
In April 2011, Apple filed a suit in a US court against Samsung, claiming the South Korean manufacturer “slavishly copied” Apple’s design for its Galaxy phones. This suit was just the beginning of many others which were, and are still being replicated and counter-claimed across the world for multiple devices.
The Federal Circuit Review is a monthly newsletter featuring the latest case summaries handed down from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
In this Issue:
Smartphone War Update: Some of Apple’s Patents Survive Invalidity Challenge
• Sale by Foreign Supplier Invalidated Patent
• District Court Abused Discretion in Refusing to Keep Confidential Documents Secret
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
Skye Residences | Extended Stay Residences Near Toronto Airportmarketingjdass
Experience unparalleled EXTENDED STAY and comfort at Skye Residences located just minutes from Toronto Airport. Discover sophisticated accommodations tailored for discerning travelers.
Website Link :
https://skyeresidences.com/
https://skyeresidences.com/about-us/
https://skyeresidences.com/gallery/
https://skyeresidences.com/rooms/
https://skyeresidences.com/near-by-attractions/
https://skyeresidences.com/commute/
https://skyeresidences.com/contact/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-and-balcony/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-king-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
#Skye Residences Etobicoke, #Skye Residences Near Toronto Airport, #Skye Residences Toronto, #Skye Hotel Toronto, #Skye Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Near Toronto Airport Accommodation, #Suites Near Toronto Airport, #Etobicoke Suites Near Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Pearson International Airport, #Toronto Airport Suite Rentals, #Pearson Airport Hotel Suites
Attending a job Interview for B1 and B2 Englsih learnersErika906060
It is a sample of an interview for a business english class for pre-intermediate and intermediate english students with emphasis on the speking ability.
RMD24 | Debunking the non-endemic revenue myth Marvin Vacquier Droop | First ...BBPMedia1
Marvin neemt je in deze presentatie mee in de voordelen van non-endemic advertising op retail media netwerken. Hij brengt ook de uitdagingen in beeld die de markt op dit moment heeft op het gebied van retail media voor niet-leveranciers.
Retail media wordt gezien als het nieuwe advertising-medium en ook mediabureaus richten massaal retail media-afdelingen op. Merken die niet in de betreffende winkel liggen staan ook nog niet in de rij om op de retail media netwerken te adverteren. Marvin belicht de uitdagingen die er zijn om echt aansluiting te vinden op die markt van non-endemic advertising.
Business Valuation Principles for EntrepreneursBen Wann
This insightful presentation is designed to equip entrepreneurs with the essential knowledge and tools needed to accurately value their businesses. Understanding business valuation is crucial for making informed decisions, whether you're seeking investment, planning to sell, or simply want to gauge your company's worth.
"𝑩𝑬𝑮𝑼𝑵 𝑾𝑰𝑻𝑯 𝑻𝑱 𝑰𝑺 𝑯𝑨𝑳𝑭 𝑫𝑶𝑵𝑬"
𝐓𝐉 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐬 (𝐓𝐉 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬) is a professional event agency that includes experts in the event-organizing market in Vietnam, Korea, and ASEAN countries. We provide unlimited types of events from Music concerts, Fan meetings, and Culture festivals to Corporate events, Internal company events, Golf tournaments, MICE events, and Exhibitions.
𝐓𝐉 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐬 provides unlimited package services including such as Event organizing, Event planning, Event production, Manpower, PR marketing, Design 2D/3D, VIP protocols, Interpreter agency, etc.
Sports events - Golf competitions/billiards competitions/company sports events: dynamic and challenging
⭐ 𝐅𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬:
➢ 2024 BAEKHYUN [Lonsdaleite] IN HO CHI MINH
➢ SUPER JUNIOR-L.S.S. THE SHOW : Th3ee Guys in HO CHI MINH
➢FreenBecky 1st Fan Meeting in Vietnam
➢CHILDREN ART EXHIBITION 2024: BEYOND BARRIERS
➢ WOW K-Music Festival 2023
➢ Winner [CROSS] Tour in HCM
➢ Super Show 9 in HCM with Super Junior
➢ HCMC - Gyeongsangbuk-do Culture and Tourism Festival
➢ Korean Vietnam Partnership - Fair with LG
➢ Korean President visits Samsung Electronics R&D Center
➢ Vietnam Food Expo with Lotte Wellfood
"𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲, 𝐚 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐣𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲. 𝐖𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬."
Explore our most comprehensive guide on lookback analysis at SafePaaS, covering access governance and how it can transform modern ERP audits. Browse now!
Unveiling the Secrets How Does Generative AI Work.pdfSam H
At its core, generative artificial intelligence relies on the concept of generative models, which serve as engines that churn out entirely new data resembling their training data. It is like a sculptor who has studied so many forms found in nature and then uses this knowledge to create sculptures from his imagination that have never been seen before anywhere else. If taken to cyberspace, gans work almost the same way.
What are the main advantages of using HR recruiter services.pdfHumanResourceDimensi1
HR recruiter services offer top talents to companies according to their specific needs. They handle all recruitment tasks from job posting to onboarding and help companies concentrate on their business growth. With their expertise and years of experience, they streamline the hiring process and save time and resources for the company.
[Note: This is a partial preview. To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
Sustainability has become an increasingly critical topic as the world recognizes the need to protect our planet and its resources for future generations. Sustainability means meeting our current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. It involves long-term planning and consideration of the consequences of our actions. The goal is to create strategies that ensure the long-term viability of People, Planet, and Profit.
Leading companies such as Nike, Toyota, and Siemens are prioritizing sustainable innovation in their business models, setting an example for others to follow. In this Sustainability training presentation, you will learn key concepts, principles, and practices of sustainability applicable across industries. This training aims to create awareness and educate employees, senior executives, consultants, and other key stakeholders, including investors, policymakers, and supply chain partners, on the importance and implementation of sustainability.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1. Develop a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental principles and concepts that form the foundation of sustainability within corporate environments.
2. Explore the sustainability implementation model, focusing on effective measures and reporting strategies to track and communicate sustainability efforts.
3. Identify and define best practices and critical success factors essential for achieving sustainability goals within organizations.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction and Key Concepts of Sustainability
2. Principles and Practices of Sustainability
3. Measures and Reporting in Sustainability
4. Sustainability Implementation & Best Practices
To download the complete presentation, visit: https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations
Improving profitability for small businessBen Wann
In this comprehensive presentation, we will explore strategies and practical tips for enhancing profitability in small businesses. Tailored to meet the unique challenges faced by small enterprises, this session covers various aspects that directly impact the bottom line. Attendees will learn how to optimize operational efficiency, manage expenses, and increase revenue through innovative marketing and customer engagement techniques.
Cracking the Workplace Discipline Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
Cultivating and maintaining discipline within teams is a critical differentiator for successful organisations.
Forward-thinking leaders and business managers understand the impact that discipline has on organisational success. A disciplined workforce operates with clarity, focus, and a shared understanding of expectations, ultimately driving better results, optimising productivity, and facilitating seamless collaboration.
Although discipline is not a one-size-fits-all approach, it can help create a work environment that encourages personal growth and accountability rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
In this deck, you will learn the significance of workplace discipline for organisational success. You’ll also learn
• Four (4) workplace discipline methods you should consider
• The best and most practical approach to implementing workplace discipline.
• Three (3) key tips to maintain a disciplined workplace.
2. In the recent months Apple has accused Samsung of
infringing upon a different set of patents in more than 20
proprietary devices
3. Samsung previously aimed its counterclaims at the iPhone
4, iPhone 4S, iPad 2, the new iPad, and iPod touch
products, but now, the company is seeking an amendment to
this lawsuit that was initially filed in April to include Apple’s
iPhone 5.
4. The ultimate resolution of the conflicts between the
companies will be a cross-licensing agreement with a
negligible exchange of cash.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. Since 2011, the two tech moguls have engaged in quite a
tussle over design infringement, Apple has repeatedly
accused Samsung (not without merit) of imitating its designs
for its various products. While, one cannot deny Samsung's
products bears a definite resemblance to the corresponding
Apple products, Apple might have taken the issue a little too
far by suing the company for $2.5 Billion.
The two companies have been dispute in over 10 countries.
10. Recently, Apple won a huge patent infringement case in California
against Samsung. In August, a court ruling said Samsung "willfully
infringed" on a number of Apple's patent devices, granting them
$1.05 billion.
Throughout the trial, Samsung has maintained that it merely drew
inspiration from Apple's designs, while Apple insisted that the
company blatantly "ripped off" its designs.
Samsung's lawyer Charles Verhoeven said, "Everyone is out there
with that basic form factor...There is nothing wrong with looking at
what your competitors do and being inspired by them," as reported
by Time Magazine.
11. The two electronics moguls Samsung Electronics Co. and
Apple Inc. find themselves again in another legal battle, but
this time the South Korean has accused the Cupertino
company of infringing on its patent related to long-term
evolution technology (LTE) and faster fourth generation
wireless networking.
Last week, Samsung filed a case management statement
against Apple's latest smartphone, the iPhone 5, for eight
patent infringements.
12. According to a Samsung statement released on
WebproNews.com, "Samsung anticipates that it will
file, in the near future, a motion to amend its
infringement contentions to add the iPhone 5 as an
accused product. On September 12, 2012, Apple
announced that it will release the iPhone 5 on
September 21, 2012. Based on information currently
available, Samsung expects that the iPhone 5 will
infringe the asserted Samsung patents-in-suit in the
same way as the other accused iPhone models.
Samsung plans to file a motion to amend its
infringement contentions to address the iPhone 5 as
soon as it has had a reasonable opportunity to analyze
the device.“
13. Apple released a statement in direct rebuttal to the South
Korean company on Reuters, "It's no coincidence that
Samsung's latest products look a lot like the iPhone and
iPad, from the shape of the hardware to the user interface
and even the packaging."
14. We are grateful to the jury for their service and for investing
the time to listen to our story and we were thrilled to be able
to finally tell it. The mountain of evidence presented during
the trail showed that Samsung’s copying went far deeper than
even we knew. The lawsuits between Apple and Samsung
were about much more than patents or money. They were
about values. At Apple, we value originality and innovation
and pour our lives into making the best products on earth.
We make these products to delight our customers, not for our
competitors to flagrantly copy. We applaud the court for
finding Samsung’s behavior willful and for sending a loud and
clear message that stealing isn’t right.
15. “We have always preferred to compete in the
marketplace with our innovative products, rather than in
courtrooms,” Samsung said in a statement to The Verge.
“However, Apple continues to take aggressive legal
measures that will limit market competition. Under
these circumstances, we have little choice but to take
the steps necessary to protect our innovations and
intellectual property rights.”
Samsung is counter suing Apple for approximately $400
million for damages to reputation and $22 million in
royalties.
The jury ruled against all of Samsung's counter claims
amounting up to $400 million.
16. Every indication suggests that the verdict won't be a clean
one. There will likely be damages on both sides, and it's still
unclear whether there will be clear victor. In addition, the
option to appeal could drag this case on for several more
years. A separate appeals case between the two regarding
software elements of Android and a potential ban on the
Galaxy Nexus is set to start in 2014.
Further complicating matters is this week's decision from a
South Korean court that both companies infringed on each
others' patents, resulting in bans and fines on both sides. The
two have sued each other in multiple courts in multiple
countries, potentially extending the entanglements for years
17. After months of anticipation the jury finally reached a verdict
in the Apple v. Samsung lawsuit granting Apple Inc. $1 billion
for patent infringement. The jury of nine ruled that Samsung
Electronics Co. did in fact "rip off" Apple Inc. by copying the
company's revolutionary designs for the computer tablet iPad
and smartphone iPhone. The jury decided that the South
Korean company should pay $1.05 billion to Apple.
18. • http://www.ibtimes.com/apple-vs-samsung-lawsuit-iphone-
5-targeted-ongoing-patent-battle-798883
Stern, J. (2012, 10 02). [Web log message]. Retrieved from
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/apple-samsung-wages-
galaxy-tab-ban-lifted-samsung/story?id=17376176
