The prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960Ravikumar Patil
In that slides providing knowledge about the animal cruelty act, 1960 for the basic knowledge to the pharmacy students regarding subject Pharmaceutical Jurisprudence.
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, authored by acclaimed dancer and animal lover, Rukmini Devi Arundale, is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted in 1960 to prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on animals and to amend the laws relating to the prevention of cruelty to animals.
The prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960Ravikumar Patil
In that slides providing knowledge about the animal cruelty act, 1960 for the basic knowledge to the pharmacy students regarding subject Pharmaceutical Jurisprudence.
The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, authored by acclaimed dancer and animal lover, Rukmini Devi Arundale, is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted in 1960 to prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on animals and to amend the laws relating to the prevention of cruelty to animals.
This ppt is based on the Animals Act -1960 proposed for the welfare of ANIMALS. It contains the objective and comeetee which were established for the development of animals
This presents briefly the history of animal welfare, acts and rules govern prevention of cruelty to animals in India, about AWBI etc. Next presentation will describe about various form of cruelty caused to animals. This is a small effort to aware citizens on prevention of cruellty and to be compassionate for them.
Prevention of Cruelty to animals Act-1960: Objectives, Definitions, Institutional Animal Ethics Committee, Breeding and Stocking of Animals, Performance of Experiments, Transfer and acquisition of animals for experiment, Records, Power to suspend or revoke registration, Offences and Penalties
objective, definition, IAEC, CPCSEA guidelines for breeding & stocking of animals, transfer of acquisition of animals for expt., power to suspect or revoke registration, offences & penalties.
this presentation contain information related to animal welfare. various organisation working for animal welfare in india and information about animal welfare board of india.
The prevention of cruelty to animals act 1960Shaik Rasheed
This presentation give the complete information regarding the The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 including the definitions, composition of IAEC, Breeding and stocking of animals, experiments, offences and penalties.
Explores the use of animals in research and the depth to which humans think they are dependent on animals. Alternatives offered including but not limited to Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animals in Research
This ppt is based on the Animals Act -1960 proposed for the welfare of ANIMALS. It contains the objective and comeetee which were established for the development of animals
This presents briefly the history of animal welfare, acts and rules govern prevention of cruelty to animals in India, about AWBI etc. Next presentation will describe about various form of cruelty caused to animals. This is a small effort to aware citizens on prevention of cruellty and to be compassionate for them.
Prevention of Cruelty to animals Act-1960: Objectives, Definitions, Institutional Animal Ethics Committee, Breeding and Stocking of Animals, Performance of Experiments, Transfer and acquisition of animals for experiment, Records, Power to suspend or revoke registration, Offences and Penalties
objective, definition, IAEC, CPCSEA guidelines for breeding & stocking of animals, transfer of acquisition of animals for expt., power to suspect or revoke registration, offences & penalties.
this presentation contain information related to animal welfare. various organisation working for animal welfare in india and information about animal welfare board of india.
The prevention of cruelty to animals act 1960Shaik Rasheed
This presentation give the complete information regarding the The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 including the definitions, composition of IAEC, Breeding and stocking of animals, experiments, offences and penalties.
Explores the use of animals in research and the depth to which humans think they are dependent on animals. Alternatives offered including but not limited to Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animals in Research
This collection of articles has been compiled by Animal Rights Advocates Inc. (ARA) to provide an abolitionist critique of animal welfare approaches in animal advocacy.
This collection of articles has been compiled by Animal Rights Advocates Inc. (ARA) to provide an abolitionist critique of animal welfare approaches in animal advocacy.
Similar to Animal Welfare Act and Animals in Science (14)
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
1. Animal Advocacy
Animals in Science and the
Animal Welfare Act
This work by Valerie LangWaldin, J.D., M.L.S. is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License.
4. Animal Welfare Act
7 USC Sec. 2131 • The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is
the federal law that governs the
humane care, handling, treatment,
and transportation of animals used
in laboratories. Contrary to
popular belief, it does not prohibit
any experiment, no matter how
painful or useless; it simply sets
minimum housing and
maintenance standards for
confined animals.
– The AWA also covers dealers who sell
animals to laboratories, transporters of
animals, dog and cat breeders, puppy
mills, zoos, circuses, roadside
menageries, and animal exhibitors,
carriers, and intermediate handlers.
5. The Nature of Science Science
• Most science
does not deal
with the
infliction of pain
on nonhuman
animals.
6. • Issue first arose in Great Britain
• National Anti-Vivisection Society formed in
1875
Policy Discussion
8. Spectrum of Thought
Some individuals and
organizations believe
that animals should
not be used in
research at all.
Others vigorously
defend the use of
animals.
Some think that
animals must be used
in research, but they
would allow it only
under strict criteria
and only when
absolutely necessary.
9.
10. Are different species or sources of animals
more acceptable than others? (Animals
specifically bred for research use versus
stray pets from local government pounds.)
12. Duties toward these animals?
• Are there duties toward
the animals used in
research that deal with
conditions of housing and
care before experiments?
What level of pain may be
inflicted? What are the
duties toward the animal
after the experiment?
13. If some use of animals is appropriate, then
how do you draw the line between
acceptable and unacceptable?
14. Remember…
• The first anti-cruelty law in the U.S.
adopted in 1867 in N.Y. contained only
one exception: the perceived needs of
science.
– Section 10.
• Nothing in this act contained shall be construed to
prohibit or interfere with an properly conducted
scientific experiments or investigations… under the
authority of the faculty of some regularly
incorporated medical college or university…
15. • that supports the notion that animals should have a
pain-free life.
– The pursuit of science has long been one of the areas where the
interests of animals have been set aside for the needs of human
science.
No law exists…
16. • Should science be exempt from the
general animal protection laws known as
the anti-cruelty laws?
We need to ask ourselves:
17. Do we know what constitutes pain
and suffering in various species?
• Since animals, unlike
humans, usually cannot
volunteer to partake in
experiments, when is it
appropriate to subject
animals to activities which
produce pain, suffering or
death?
18.
19. Interest of Animals, Scientific Progress
Each passing
decade the
U.S. gives
more weight to
the interests of
animals.
The evolution at
the federal level
can be seen in
the increasingly
detailed focus of
the federal
Animal Welfare
Act on the actions
of science.
20. • From USDA Animal Welfare Reports
– Total animals reported used in research
(excluding rats, mice and birds):
• 1985 – 2,153,787 at 1,105 reporting facilities
• 1999 – 1,217,998 at 1,232 reporting facilities
• 2001 – 705,602 at 1,216 reporting facilities
Animals in Research
21. But…
Rats, mice, birds
• Rats and mice represent
approximately 90 percent
of the animals used in
research. They are not
included in the above
numbers because
facilities are not required
to report on them.
22. 1990 1998 2004
Dogs 109,992 70,541- 64,932-
Cats 33,700 23,238- 23,640+
Primates 47,177 54,927+ 54,998+
Rabbits 399,264 288,222- 261,573-
Animals in Research – does not include rats and mice,
which run into the millions each year
23. Why a meaningful reduction?
3 Main Reasons:
• (1) Individual scientists are increasingly
unable to make these decisions behind
closed laboratory doors.
– Most institutions have Animal Care
Committees in place that require anyone
undertaking scientific research where animals
are involved to first justify their proposal by full
presentation to the Committee.
24.
25. Why a meaningful reduction?
3 Main Reasons:
• (2) There has been increasing awareness
that the housing of animals before and
after experimentation raises as many
issues than the experiments themselves.
26. Why a meaningful reduction?
3 Main Reasons:
• (3) The cost of keeping animals has
become significant enough that economic
factors can contribute to reductions in the
number of animals used. This increased
cost even prompts some researchers to
seek alternatives to the use of live
animals.
27. Would you believe…
The USDA itself has become a
focus point for finding alternatives to
the use of animals in research.
Click here.
28. So let’s get on with the story
of
the Animal Welfare Act
29. 1960s
• Two big issues brewing
– (1) Animals in science, research and testing
– (2) Story in Life magazine about how pet dogs
and cats were being stolen and sold to
research facilities
• (Life, Vol. 60, Feb. 4, 1966)
30.
31. Summary of AWA Over Time
• 1966 law – created a licensing system for
animal dealers and laboratories that use
dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, hamsters
and guinea pigs.
• Limited to care, handling, housing, and
transport conditions of prior to ultimate use
by research facilities
32. 1966 Law – 3 Main Purposes:
• (1) To protect owners of pet dogs and cats
from theft
• (2) To prevent the use or sale of stolen
cats or dogs for purposes of research or
experimentation
• (3) To establish humane standards for the
treatment of dogs, cats and certain other
animals by animal dealers and research
facilities
33. In 1966, after significant lobbying by a
number of scientific organizations,
Congress opted not to interfere with the
use of animals in research, teaching or
tests by research facilities.
Hands off approach
34.
35. Source of the Dogs and Cats:
Illegal, Stolen Animals
• Now, back in 1966 as the AWA was just
evolving, the demand for research
animals was so high that there was a
huge demand for stolen pets. Stolen pets
were quickly moved across state lines and
the system was inadequate in
apprehending and / or convicting the
thieves.
36.
37. Illegal, Stolen Animals
• So, the AWA prohibited any registered
research institution from acquiring dogs or
cats from any source other than
government licensed sources.
38. 1966 Law
(1) Secretary of Agriculture had to set up a
regulatory program to license all dealers in dogs
and cats and a system of record keeping was
required for all dealers and research facilities.
39. 1966 Law
(2) All animal dealers were required to register
with the USDA, and research facilities were
required to purchase dogs and cats from only
licensed dealers.
40. 1966 Law
(3) The law directed the Secretary of Agriculture
to provide humane care provisions enforceable
through inspections.
41. 1970 Amendments
• (1) Definition of animal was expanded to
include warm-blooded animals generally
(1966 law only included dogs, cats,
primates, guinea pigs, hamsters and
rabbits).
42. 1970 Amendments
• (2) Animal exhibitors (such as zoos,
circuses and roadside shows) and
wholesale pet dealers were brought under
the regulatory provisions of the Act.
– Exhibitors and dealers had to have licenses to
operate and became subject to inspections
43. 1970 Amendments
• (3) Certain humane standards in
laboratories were to be maintained at all
times.
• Temperature, food, water
• Pain-killing drugs if they did not interfere with
research – but this is a real loophole.
44. 1976 Amendments
• Didn’t deal with research facilities and
dealers. Instead, dealt with:
• Transportation carriers and handlers, and
• A new provision was added to make it a
crime to knowingly sponsor, participate in,
transport, or use the mail to promote
animal fighting.
47. 1985 Amendments
– Minimum levels of care were defined more
clearly.
• Required dogs held by research facilities to be
exercised
• Required a physical environment adequate to
promote the psychological well-being of primates
– This was the first time that Congress extended scope
of the law beyond just physical requirements like
food and water. Lawmakers acknowledged that
primates have legal interests in some quality of
mental life.
48. 1985 Amendments
Animal research facilities were required to
create Institutional Animal Committees
and include a member of the public on the
committee.
First time Congress directly stated that its
intent was to govern by regulation certain
actions that might occur during a scientific
experiment.
49. Institutional Animal Care
Committees
The primary statutory responsibility of
the committee is to engage in
inspections of the research facility at
least twice a year.
50. Institutional Animal Care Committees
• (A) At least one member shall be a doctor of
veterinary medicine
• (B) At least one member
– Shall not be affiliated in any way with such facility
other than as a member of the Committee
– Shall not be a member of the immediate family of a
person who is affiliated with such facility
– Is intended to provide representation for general
community interests in the proper care and treatment
of animals
51. 2002 Amendments (Progress?)
• Provisions which would have stiffened
penalties for animal fighting did not pass.
• Early versions of the bill mandated the
humane euthanasia of “downers”
(animals who are too sick or injured to
walk in to a slaughterhouse) but these
proposed changes were also eliminated.
52. 2002 Amendments
• The USDA had just agreed to expand the
definition of “research animal” to include
rats, mice and birds. However, Sen.
Jesse Helms from NC proposed an
amendment, which passed, that denied
AWA protection to these creatures.
• As a result, birds, mice and rats are not
protected by the AWA.
53.
54. Not a broad anti-cruelty law and
does NOT deal with all species
55. Use of animals in K-12 education
Hunting, fishing, trapping
Slaughter (under the federal Humane Slaughter Act)
Animals in agriculture production
Retail pet stores
Veterinary care of animals outside licensed and registered institutions
Injuries by animals or inflicted upon animals
Animals other than mammals (reptiles)
State and county fairs, livestock shows, rodeos, purebred dog and cat
shows
NOT COVERED BY THE AWA:
60. Covered by the AWA:
• Theft of pet dogs and cats being sold to research and testing
facilities
• Breeding and wholesale distribution of some mammals
– (mostly dogs and circus animals)
• Auctions
• Animals in research labs (universities and private industry) including
horses used as research
• Transportation of listed animals
• Mammals in zoos and exhibitions (but this excludes state and
county fairs, livestock shows, rodeos, purebred dog and cat shows,
and any other fairs intended to advance agricultural arts and
sciences)
61.
62. Animal Welfare Act is a
regulatory scheme of licenses
and inspections to establish
minimum conditions
63. Congress delegated the job of
developing particular
requirements for the care of
animals to the USDA, and
in particular, the USDA’s
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS)
64. These requirements are species-
specific.
• Example: If a cat is kept in a cage in an
institution registered under the AWA, then
the keeper of the cat must satisfy the
following regulations:
– (a) Heating, cooling and temperature. The sheltered
part of sheltered housing facilities for dogs and cats
must be sufficiently heated and cooled when
necessary to protect the dogs and cats from
temperature or humidity extremes and to provide for
their health and well-being. The ambient temperature
in the sheltered part of the facility must not fall below
50 deg. (10 deg. C) for dogs and cats not acclimated
to lower temperatures…
65.
66.
67. Dog Exercise and Primate
Psychological Well-Being
AWA Regulations
70. This is the cage size which satisfies the
regulations for great apes.
71. Sec. 3.81 Environment enhancement to
promote psychological well-being.
Primates
•
Dealers, exhibitors, and research
facilities must develop, document, and
follow an appropriate plan for
environment enhancement adequate to
promote the psychological well-being of
nonhuman primates.
The plan must be in accordance with
the currently accepted professional
standards as cited in appropriate
professional journals or reference
guides, and as directed by the attending
veterinarian. This plan must be made
available to APHIS upon request, and,
in the case of research facilities, to
officials of any pertinent funding
agency..
72. An Insider’s View:
Viktor Reinhardt
The Impossible Housing and
Handling Conditions of Monkeys in
Research Laboratories C-16
C-16
75. ALDF v. Glickman
• When ALDF discovered a chimpanzee named Barney in
a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)-licensed
roadside zoo, he was languishing in solitary confinement
on the cement floor of a cage. Deprived of
companionship and veterinary care, he suffered from
severe psychological and physical distress until he
escaped from his cage and was shot and killed by a zoo
employee. On behalf of Mark Jurnove, a frequent zoo
visitor disturbed by the isolation and neglect that marked
Barney’s daily life, ALDF sued the USDA for failing to set
standards to protect primates under the federal Animal
Welfare Act (AWA).
76.
77. ALDF v. Glickman
• In October 1996, a U.S. District Court Judge found the USDA in
violation of the AWA and ordered the agency to develop stricter
standards, emphasizing the need to address the psychological well-
being of primates in captivity. U.S. District Court Judge Charles
Richey called the USDA’s failure to issue such standards.
"egregious." "This case involves an abject failure in the rulemaking
process…to enforce the AWA," he stated.
78. ALDF v. Glickman
• While the Court of Appeals later held that the "standards" set by the
USDA were already adequate, they upheld the decision that
Jurnove did have legal standing to sue to protect the interests of
animals under the AWA. This decision established that animal
activists have standing to sue under the Animal Welfare Act and has
been cited frequently in subsequent litigation promoting humane
treatment of animals.
84. To Discourage Use of
Stolen Animals
RECORD
TRAIL
• Record trail
follows animal
through chain
of transfer
DEALER
HOLDING
PERIOD • 5 days
85. The problem lies in someone stealing the animals
and selling them to a licensed dealer.
So, dealers are required to do their homework and require
proof of ownership from those they purchase the animals from.
86.
87.
88. Source of Dogs and Cats:
Legal, Random Sources
Aside from us of stolen pets for research,
the use of EX-PETS generates a lot of
debate.
The issue arises when local shelters or pounds
sell ex-pets rather than euthanize them.
Prior owners are usually not aware of this
possibility.
89.
90. Class A, B, and C Dealers
Class “A” License (breeder) – business
involves only animals that are bred and
raised on the premises
91. Class A, B and C Dealers
Class “B” licensee means a person
whose business includes the purchase
and/or resale of any animal. Class B
licensees include brokers, and operators of
an auction sale. Usually do not take
physical possession of the animals.
But C.C. Baird operated differently. He took
possession of the animals.
92.
93. Class A, B and C Dealers
Class “C” (exhibitor) means a person
who business involves the showing or
displaying of animals to the public.
94. AWA is REGULATORY
All facilities licensed or registered under
the Animal Welfare Act are inspected.
Requested inspection reports and
supporting documentation can be found
here.
95. Section 4 of the AWA
No dealer or exhibitor shall sell or offer to sell
or transport or offer for transportation, in
commerce, to any research facility or for
exhibition or for use as a pet any animal, or buy,
sell, offer to buy or sell, transport or offer for
transportation, in commerce, to or from
another dealer or exhibitor under this
chapter any animals, unless and until such
dealer or exhibitor shall have obtained a
license from the Secretary and such license
shall not have been suspended or revoked.
96. Dealer Defined
The term “dealer” means any person who,
in commerce, for compensation or profit,
delivers for transportation, or transports,
except as a carrier, buys, or sells, or
negotiates the purchase or sale of
(1) any dog or other animal whether alive
or dead for research, teaching, exhibition,
or use as a pet, or
97. Dealer Defined
(2) any dog for hunting, security, or
breeding purposes, except that this term
does not include-
(i) a retail pet store except such store which
sells any animals to a research facility, an
exhibitor, or a dealer.
98. Recap:
Recap:
1. The USDA is responsible for
coming up with regulations necessary for
enforcing the AWA.
2. Within the USDA, the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (“APHIS”)
investigates.
99. Two Types of Investigations:
Routine (no advance notice)
As a result of complaint filed – APHIS is
required to investigate
100. Violation Procedure
If USDA thinks violation deserves sanctions,
a civil complaint filed within the USDA.
(1) Administrative Law Judge presides (ALJ appointed by USDA)
(2) Suspension or revocation of license and civil fines
(3) If the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is appealed,
it goes to a Judicial Officer (usually defers to ALJ).
102. For a list of PEOPLE who
are exempt from licensing
requirements see page
384.
103. Animals Included Under the AWA
Live or dead
Dog or cat – wild or domestic
Monkey (“nonhuman primate mammal”)
Warm-blooded animals except birds, rats,
mice
107. Animals NOT Covered by the AWA
Livestock or poultry used for improving
animal nutrition
So a sheep used in different experiments at
the same university are subject to different
rules:
108. When sheep are used in a medical center to study
use of drugs in preventing premature birth, the
sheep are protected under the AWA.
Same sheep if used for nutritional studies are not
covered.
109. ENTER PAWS
Why is the bill necessary?
The PAWS bill is necessary because
currently all commercial breeders of dogs
and cats who sell their animals directly to
the public avoid AWA licensing and
humane handling requirements even when
they are selling a large number of
animals.
110.
111. Pet Animal Welfare Statute (PAWS)
– 2007 - NEVER BECAME LAW
Strengthens existing law covering commercial breeding
facilities by amending the Animal Welfare Act (AWA).
The PAWS legislation would require that any commercial
breeder who sells more than six litters of dogs or cats,
and produces more than 25 puppies or kittens, directly
to the public in a year be licensed by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
112. PAWS
The growing popularity of the Internet has
created an unintentional loophole in the current
law, allowing these commercial breeders to
classify themselves "retail pet stores" and evade
all federal oversight. As a result, raising animals
in deplorable conditions and selling them to
someone sight unseen has become even easier,
and is a highly profitable business. These high
volume dealers are commonly referred to as
"puppy mills."
113.
114. PAWS
Some of the more technical aspects of the
bill address a growing frustration that the
enforcement of the AWA has been
hampered by cumbersome procedures and
limited resources. One great concern has
been the growing number of breeders
overseas who see the United States as a
lucrative market for dogs, whom breeders
can mass produce with no humane
regulations or oversight.
115. PAWS
The public source records section of the bill will
allow the USDA to determine the origin of dogs
and cats coming into the United States and trace
their pathway, allowing for better control of
disease and inhumane treatment. Sections
expanding the temporary suspension and giving
the USDA the ability to enjoin breeding
operations will enhance the USDA's enforcement
capability.
116.
117. PAWS
This bill will not regulate people who sell an
occasional litter of puppies, but will give the
USDA the opportunity to inspect and ensure
humane treatment of animals at large facilities.
The bill is carefully aimed at closing the current
loophole in the AWA that allows commercial
breeders who sell over the Internet to go
unchecked.
119. Roach Laboratories Case, 1992
Roach produced and sold an antiserum from the blood of rabbits,
goats, and sheep.
Antiserum production involves injection into a live animal followed by
extraction of blood.
120. Complaint filed by the Administrator of
APHIS (USDA’s Animal & Plant Health
Inspection Service)
Alleged that Roach operated as a dealer
without being licensed
Operated a research facility without being
registered
Refused to allow APHIS to inspect the
records and facilities of Roach
Laboratories
Roach Laboratories Case, 1992
121. Roach’s defense:
• Roach argued he was
not a dealer and
therefore did not
require a dealer’s
license.
– He tried to make the
argument that there is a
difference between
selling serum and
antiserum and that he
only tested blood from
individual animals
instead of a pool of
animals.
122. Roach’s defense:
Roach also said he
did not obtain the
rabbits from a dealer
in commerce .
For these procedures,
Roach bought 198
rabbits from Shelton’s
Bunny Barn, which is a
licensed dealer under
the AWA.
123. Roach’s defense:
Research Facility
Roach said that
he was not is not a
“research facility”
as defined by the
Animal Welfare Act
and therefore was
not required to be
registered with the
USDA.
Animal Welfare Act
124. What is a research facility?
That’s all the law says.
7 U.S.C. § 2132 (e) The term
“research facility” means any school
(except an elementary or secondary
school), institution, organization, or
person that uses or intends to use
live animals in research, tests, or
experiments, and that (1) purchases
or transports live animals in
commerce, or (2) receives funds
under a grant, award, loan, or
contract from a department, agency,
or instrumentality of the United
States for the purpose of carrying
out research, tests, or experiments.
125. Court found:
Roach was a dealer and
should be licensed as
such.
Roach was a research
facility and should be
registered as such.
Roach should allow
inspections of the
facilities as required by
the AWA.
128. Final Report On Environment Enhancement To
Promote The Psychological Well-being Of
Nonhuman Primates
U. S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Animal Care, Riverdale, MD
July 15, 1999
What follows is a summary of issues raised
in both the mail survey and telephone
interviews of APHIS Animal Care
employees… C-25
129. Results of Surveys & Interviews
Minimum Criteria Needs Clarification
Lack of Enforceability
Minimalistic and One-Sided Enhancement
Programs
Questionable Implementation of the Facility
Plans
Low Levels of Appropriate Social Grouping
Practices that Perpetuate Abnormal Behavior
Poorly Furnished Environments
130. 1. Minimum Criteria Need
Clarification
The standards in 9 CFR §3.81 emphasize the
presence of a physical document called an
“environment enhancement plan for
primates” at each facility, but the standards
contain few solid criteria on which an
inspector can judge the content of the plan
as “in compliance” or “out of compliance.”
The regulations state that the plan must
address social grouping, enrichment of the
physical environment, special
considerations, and restraint devices, but
what is required in order to address these in
a minimally compliant manner is unclear.
Some inspectors said they had the
impression that the only legally necessary
condition for compliance was the existence
of the document itself, regardless of its
contents.
131. Some inspectors said they could recognize
a plan that was not in accordance with
professional literature or was not
“adequate to promote psychological well-
being.” i.e., the inspectors said if it’s bad,
they can tell.
However, they had concerns about Agency
support for particular interpretations or
judgement because of the vague language
and nature of the performance standard.
2. Lack of Enforceability
132. Many employees supported the idea that
enhancement programs be required to
address several different aspects of a
primate’s environment and behavior,
beyond the superficial breakdown.
E.g., feeding of treats or provision with a
simple rubber toy, in an otherwise barren,
stimulus-poor environment
3. One-Sided ‘Enhancement’Programs
134. 5. Low Levels of Social Grouping
Some Animal Care
inspectors felt that there
were too many singly
housed primates.
All of these reasons reflect
convenience for the
owner(s), not primary
consideration for the
psychological needs of the
animals.
135. 6. Practices that Perpetuate Socially Incompetent
Individuals or Abnormal Behavior
Animal Care inspectors were
concerned that dealers
involved in the pet trade
continue to remove infants
from their care-giving
parent(s) at an inappropriately
early age, for reasons other
than medical necessity.
These practices are known to
produce socially incompetent
adults and contribute to the low
levels of social grouping already
identified.
137. In conjunction with the release of this report,
a policy was proposed and published, Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service, Draft
Policy on Environment Enhancement for
Nonhuman Primates, Federal Register: July 15,
1999 (Volume 64, Number 135) page 38145-
38150 [Proposed Rules] [Docket No. 98-121-
1]. But this was a policy for “guidance” not
proposed new regulations, and has yet to be
finalized into a formal policy of the agency.
138. If you want an accurate, excellent analysis of the AWA, click here.
139. Association for Assessment and
Accreditation of Laboratory Animal
Care C-31 *** The Future?
Enter AAALACA
Each passing decade the U.S. gives more weight to the interests of animals, without changing the public’s core interest in advancement of science
If some use of animals in science is appropriate, then how do you draw the line between acceptable and unacceptable?
Subsection (a)(2)(B) contains some unique language:
(B) for exercise of dogs, as determined by an attending veterinarian in accordance with general standards promulgated by the Secretary (of Agriculture)
cost of animals small part of budget for research institutions
negative PR
extensive record keeping makes tracking of possible stolen animals easier