Green features
Fact Sheet




Ambion® Cells-to-Ct™ Kits
Comparison to Traditional RNA Extraction Methods


                                       Introduction                             •	 Mercaptoethanol—may be fatal
                                       Life Technologies is committed              when absorbed through the skin
                                       to designing products with the           •	 Guanidine thiocyanate—causes
                                       environment in mind—it’s one more           irritation and is harmful if
                                       step toward a smaller footprint. This       swallowed or inhaled
                                       fact sheet provides the rationale        •	 Guanidine hydrochloride—causes
 Green Benefits                        behind the environmental claims that        irritation and is harmful if
  •	 Less use of hazardous materials   use of this product results in reduced      swallowed or inhaled
  •	 Less hazardous waste disposal     exposure to hazardous material and
                                       generates less waste than comparable     The use of Cells-to-Ct™ systems
  •	 Less use of plastic consumables
                                       products. The use of Ambion® Cells-      eliminates the need to use any of the
  •	 Less plastic waste disposal       to-Ct™ kits eliminates the need to use   hazardous solvents mentioned above.
                                       hazardous solvents and requires far
                                       less plastic consumables from sample     Please review the MSDS for the
                                       preparation to final analysis.           Cells-to-Ct™ kits at http://www3.
                                                                                appliedbiosystems.com/sup/msds/
                                       Product Description                      search.htm
                                       Ambion® Cells-to-Ct™ kits include
                                       reagents and enzyme mixtures             Less Waste
                                       for reverse transcription (RT) and       Traditional methodologies for RNA
                                       real-time PCR directly from cultured     extraction require multiple steps
                                       cell lysates, without the need for a     for RNA extraction and clean-up,
                                       separate RNA isolation step.             requiring the use of multiple
                                                                                disposable tubes, vials, pipettes, and
                                       Green Features                           pipette tips. Cells-to-Ct™ kits require
                                       Less Hazardous                           fewer plastic consumables than
                                       Traditional RNA extraction protocols     traditional technologies (Figure 1). A
                                       require clean-up with the use of         comparison of Cells-to-Ct™ kits with
                                       hazardous reagents such as:              traditional technology showed that
                                                                                139 g of plastic waste (tubes, pipettes,
                                       •	 Ethanol—highly flammable and          pipette tips) was generated with
                                          causes systemic toxicity              traditional RNA extraction, compared
                                                                                to 7 g for Cells-to-Ct™ kits (Table 1).
A                                                                                           B
Figure 1. Comparison of Plastic Waste Generated Using Traditional RNA Extraction Methods (A) vs. Cells-to-Ct™ Kits (B).


 Table 1. Comparison of the Amount of Waste Generated Using Traditional RNA Extraction Methods vs. Cells-to-Ct™ Kits.
                     Traditional RNA extraction methods                                                                 Cells-to-Ct™ kits
     Step in            Plastic                          Piece            Total              Step in            Plastic                         Piece            Total
    procedure         description        # Used         weight (g)       mass (g)           procedure         description        # Used        weight (g)       mass (g)
 Add 100%               50 mL tip            1             20.75           20.75        Tube for lysis            1.5 mL             1             1.00            1.00
 ethanol to RPE                                                                         mix                        tube
 Add B-ME to            1 mL tip             1              0.85            0.85        Add lysis mix            1 mL tip            1             0.85            0.85
 RLT                                                                                    to tube
 Tube for                 50 mL              1             12.54           12.54        Add DNase to             20 µL tip           1             0.18            0.18
 hazardous                 tube                                                         tube
 waste
 Add 350                1 mL tip            10              0.85            8.50        Add lysis                200 µL tip         10             0.28            2.80
 µL RLT to                                                                              solution to
 samples                                                                                samples, mix
 Add 70%                1 mL tip            10              0.85            8.50        Add stop                 20 µL tip          10             0.18            1.80
 ethanol to                                                                             solution to
 samples                                                                                samples, mix
 Add 500                1 mL tip            10              0.85            8.50        Total used                                  23                             6.63
 µL RPE to
 samples
 Add another            1 mL tip            10              0.85            8.50
 500 µL RPE
 Tubes for               1.5 mL             10              1.00           10.00
 samples                  tube
 Add water to          200 µL tip           10              0.28            2.80
 elute
 Add water to          200 µL tip           10              0.28            2.80
 elute again
 gDNA                   column,             10              1.65           16.50
 eliminator               tube
 columns
 RNeasy                 column,             10              2.93           29.30
 (Qiagen) spin            tube
 columns
 2 mL                     Tube              10              1.00           10.00
 collection
 tubes
 Total used                                 103                           139.54        Waste                                                                     95.2%
                                                                                        reduction


For Research Use Only. Not intended for any animal or human therapeutic or diagnostic use.
© 2011 Life Technologies Corporation. All rights reserved. The trademarks mentioned herein are the property of Life Technologies Corporation or their respective owners.
Printed in the USA. CO21121-2 0711




Headquarters
5791 Van Allen Way | Carlsbad, CA 92008 USA | Phone +1.760.603.7200 | Toll Free in the USA 800.955.6288
www.lifetechnologies.com

Ambion Cells-to-Ct

  • 1.
    Green features Fact Sheet Ambion®Cells-to-Ct™ Kits Comparison to Traditional RNA Extraction Methods Introduction • Mercaptoethanol—may be fatal Life Technologies is committed when absorbed through the skin to designing products with the • Guanidine thiocyanate—causes environment in mind—it’s one more irritation and is harmful if step toward a smaller footprint. This swallowed or inhaled fact sheet provides the rationale • Guanidine hydrochloride—causes Green Benefits behind the environmental claims that irritation and is harmful if • Less use of hazardous materials use of this product results in reduced swallowed or inhaled • Less hazardous waste disposal exposure to hazardous material and generates less waste than comparable The use of Cells-to-Ct™ systems • Less use of plastic consumables products. The use of Ambion® Cells- eliminates the need to use any of the • Less plastic waste disposal to-Ct™ kits eliminates the need to use hazardous solvents mentioned above. hazardous solvents and requires far less plastic consumables from sample Please review the MSDS for the preparation to final analysis. Cells-to-Ct™ kits at http://www3. appliedbiosystems.com/sup/msds/ Product Description search.htm Ambion® Cells-to-Ct™ kits include reagents and enzyme mixtures Less Waste for reverse transcription (RT) and Traditional methodologies for RNA real-time PCR directly from cultured extraction require multiple steps cell lysates, without the need for a for RNA extraction and clean-up, separate RNA isolation step. requiring the use of multiple disposable tubes, vials, pipettes, and Green Features pipette tips. Cells-to-Ct™ kits require Less Hazardous fewer plastic consumables than Traditional RNA extraction protocols traditional technologies (Figure 1). A require clean-up with the use of comparison of Cells-to-Ct™ kits with hazardous reagents such as: traditional technology showed that 139 g of plastic waste (tubes, pipettes, • Ethanol—highly flammable and pipette tips) was generated with causes systemic toxicity traditional RNA extraction, compared to 7 g for Cells-to-Ct™ kits (Table 1).
  • 2.
    A B Figure 1. Comparison of Plastic Waste Generated Using Traditional RNA Extraction Methods (A) vs. Cells-to-Ct™ Kits (B). Table 1. Comparison of the Amount of Waste Generated Using Traditional RNA Extraction Methods vs. Cells-to-Ct™ Kits. Traditional RNA extraction methods Cells-to-Ct™ kits Step in Plastic Piece Total Step in Plastic Piece Total procedure description # Used weight (g) mass (g) procedure description # Used weight (g) mass (g) Add 100% 50 mL tip 1 20.75 20.75 Tube for lysis 1.5 mL 1 1.00 1.00 ethanol to RPE mix tube Add B-ME to 1 mL tip 1 0.85 0.85 Add lysis mix 1 mL tip 1 0.85 0.85 RLT to tube Tube for 50 mL 1 12.54 12.54 Add DNase to 20 µL tip 1 0.18 0.18 hazardous tube tube waste Add 350 1 mL tip 10 0.85 8.50 Add lysis 200 µL tip 10 0.28 2.80 µL RLT to solution to samples samples, mix Add 70% 1 mL tip 10 0.85 8.50 Add stop 20 µL tip 10 0.18 1.80 ethanol to solution to samples samples, mix Add 500 1 mL tip 10 0.85 8.50 Total used 23 6.63 µL RPE to samples Add another 1 mL tip 10 0.85 8.50 500 µL RPE Tubes for 1.5 mL 10 1.00 10.00 samples tube Add water to 200 µL tip 10 0.28 2.80 elute Add water to 200 µL tip 10 0.28 2.80 elute again gDNA column, 10 1.65 16.50 eliminator tube columns RNeasy column, 10 2.93 29.30 (Qiagen) spin tube columns 2 mL Tube 10 1.00 10.00 collection tubes Total used 103 139.54 Waste 95.2% reduction For Research Use Only. Not intended for any animal or human therapeutic or diagnostic use. © 2011 Life Technologies Corporation. All rights reserved. The trademarks mentioned herein are the property of Life Technologies Corporation or their respective owners. Printed in the USA. CO21121-2 0711 Headquarters 5791 Van Allen Way | Carlsbad, CA 92008 USA | Phone +1.760.603.7200 | Toll Free in the USA 800.955.6288 www.lifetechnologies.com