Lip Augmentation using the
Teosyal pen
Dr Lee Walker BDS MFDS RCPSG
MJDF RCS Eng
• Clinical director B city clinics Liverpool
• Founder and lead NAPG
• Expert advisory panel member- Save Face
• Clinical lead Formosa Aesthetics training
• National trainer Teoxane UK
• Medical education steering group member Teoxane
UK
• Panel expert – ACE complications group
• Clinical contributor – Aesthetics magazine
• Course co-director and senior lecturer EDMI NASI
Msc course
Objectives
• To have a practical, interactive session
• To take away something useful that can be applied to
your daily practice
• Understand anatomy and ageing of the lip
• To learn a new technique to safely and predictably
augment the lips
Lecture Content
• Introduction
• History of lip treatments
• Anatomy of the lips
• Ageing of the lips
• Lip enhancement assessment and
considerations
• Lip enhancement with Teosyal pen
Introduction
• Key to achieving attractive lips is strongly
related to understanding and respecting
anatomy
• Knowledge of ageing process essential in
appreciating what we need to focus on to
achieve more youthful lips
• Identifying key components affected by
ageing
History of lip beautification
Subjectivity of Beauty
Introduction
• Age, fashion, personal preference and cultural
differences significantly dictate what patients
desire
• Lips are an essential component of a beautiful
face as well as contributing functional roles in
communication, speech, expression and intake
of fluids and food
Lip Function
• Provide masticatory competence
• Maintain oral seal
• Indicator of general health ?
• Soft tissue boundary for dentition
• Tactile sensory organ
• Speech articulation and phonetics
• Facial expression
• Erogenous zone - kissing
Lip Anatomy
Classification of 15 Anatomical Lip Zones for Injection During Lip Augmentationa
Figure Legend:
Lip Anatomy
Sensory Nerve Supply
• Trigeminal nerve – v cranial nerve
• Maxillary and mandibular branches
Common Labial Artery Pattern
Injection anatomy
Injection anatomy
Injection anatomy
Injection anatomy
© 2014 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc.
From: Complications of Injectable Fillers, Part 2: Vascular Complications
Cadaver cross section through central third of lower lip. Note large size and superficial location of labial artery (arrow). Note
proximity of the artery to buccal mucosa, posterior to the wet-dry line of the lower lip. This area is commonly injected when
trying to evert the red lip during augmentation with hyaluronic acid fillers.
Figure Legend:
Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(4):584-600. doi:10.1177/1090820X14525035
Depth of ILA
Distance of ILA from the ORAL VESTIBULE
4.7 mm
Distance of ILA from the SKIN 2.3 mm
Distance of ILA from the ORAL MUCOSA
1.5 mm
Lip Anatomy
Position of Superior Labial Artery
Depth of SLA
Distance of SLA from the inferior border of the
red lip* 6.7 mm
Distance of SLA from the anterior border of the
red lip* 7.6 mm
Distance of SLA from the posterior border of
the red lip* 3.2 mm
Position of Labial Arteries
Analysis of youthful and ageing lips
Clinical Analysis Of Young Lips
• Smooth mucosa
• Defined cupids bow
• Median tubercule with bilateral depressions
• Corresponding small projections in lower lip
• Small depression in lower lip opposite median
tubercule of upper
• Defined philtrum columns
The tubercles of the upper and lower lips
are natural areas of prominence that should
be enhanced during lip augmentation.
Youthful lip
Clinical Analysis Of Young Lips
• In profile – short white lip with concavity
• Upper lip projection further than lower
Glogau-Klein Point
Injection Techniques
Injection Techniques
The Ageing Lip
Comparison of MRT images of typical ‘young’ (left) and typical ‘old’ (right) upper lip.
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Volume 61, Issue 10, 2008, 1170–1176
The Ageing Lip
• Loss of fullness and projection
• Development of rhytids
• Reduction in vermillion border
• Flattening of cupids bow
• Flattening of philtrum columns
• Lengthening of cutaneous upper lip
The Ageing Lip
• Genetics
• Sun exposure
• Smoking
• Thinning of musculature
• Atrophy of subcutaneous fat
• Dentoalveolar
• Ligamentous laxity
• Increase in skin laxity
Lip Dimensions
• Ideal lip proportions 1:1.618 = roughly translates to 40% upper 60% lower lip
Lip Dimensions
Lip Dimensions
Lip Dimensions
Lip Dimensions
Lip Dimensions – (Popenko 2011)
Lip Dimensions
FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS IS HIGHEST
WITH AN AVERAGE +53%
ENHANCEMENT OF LIP SA.
Lip Dimensions
Injection Techniques
Patient Assessment
• Discuss desires and expectation
• Inform on nature of filler and product used
• Discuss longevity of filler
• Possible side effects
• Social downtime
• Costs
• Anaesthesia choice
Patient Assessment
• Asymmetry
• Scar tissue
• Lumps or nodules
• Discolouration
• Discrepancy in size pre operative
• History of previous treatments
• Document with photography
• Informed consent signed
Lip Augmentation
• Understand client expectations
• Take before photos and have consent form
signed
• Shape of lips – check for asymmetry (front
view and profile)
• Peri-oral ageing Rhytids
• Volume loss - perioral
• Flattening of columella area
Lip Augmentation
• Architecture of Cupid’s bow and philtrum
• Ratio of upper and lower lip (1:1.6)
• Integrity of vermilion border and lip
pigmentation
• Decide on volumes before starting Swelling
and bruising may alter appearance once
injecting has begun
Shape
The shape influences the final result and
cannot be drastically altered without
looking unnatural.
Proportion
The upper: lower lip ratio should be close
to 40:60 and never greater than 50:50
Lip Augmentation- key considerations
Volume
Lip volume must be appropriate to the age of
the rest of the face and the size of the eyes,
cheeks and jawline.
Symmetry and feature enhancement
Full philtral columns , a Cupid’s bow that is sharp
and well defined. Symmetry is also important to the
overall lip shape as is the presence or appearance
of the Glogau-Klein point, and a defined vermilion
border.
Lip Augmentation-key considerations
Lip Augmentation-key considerations
• There is no single prescription for the
“perfect lip”
• No “one size fits all” technique
• Basic template to achieve a fuller but more
“natural look”
• Can combine with neurotoxins and laser
• Results depend on pre-existing anatomy
and experience and skills of injector
Teosyal Pen
Teosyal pen
• Worlds first motorized and cordless delivery of
HA
• Lightweight, ergonomic
• Homogeneity and smooth filler delivery
• Offers precision in delicate areas where
natural results critical
• Ease of use
Teosyal Pen
Teosyal Pen
Teosyal Pen
TEOXANE-MAIN CLINICAL FINDINGS
• Less painful injection compared to manual injection
• Quicker recovery time
• Less product used
• Homogenous delivery
• Precise dosage
• High patient satisfaction
• Lower extrusion forces on delivery
Teosyal Pen
ADVANTAGES
• Less painful injection compared to manual injection
• smoother delivery
• Precise dosage
• High patient satisfaction
• Aesthetically, looks less intimidating than manual syringe
• Portable
Teosyal Pen
DISADVANTAGES
• More expensive than manual syringes
• Patient unease at electronic sound on
injection
Injection with Teosyal pen

Ace17 lips

  • 1.
    Lip Augmentation usingthe Teosyal pen Dr Lee Walker BDS MFDS RCPSG MJDF RCS Eng
  • 2.
    • Clinical directorB city clinics Liverpool • Founder and lead NAPG • Expert advisory panel member- Save Face • Clinical lead Formosa Aesthetics training • National trainer Teoxane UK • Medical education steering group member Teoxane UK • Panel expert – ACE complications group • Clinical contributor – Aesthetics magazine • Course co-director and senior lecturer EDMI NASI Msc course
  • 3.
    Objectives • To havea practical, interactive session • To take away something useful that can be applied to your daily practice • Understand anatomy and ageing of the lip • To learn a new technique to safely and predictably augment the lips
  • 4.
    Lecture Content • Introduction •History of lip treatments • Anatomy of the lips • Ageing of the lips • Lip enhancement assessment and considerations • Lip enhancement with Teosyal pen
  • 5.
    Introduction • Key toachieving attractive lips is strongly related to understanding and respecting anatomy • Knowledge of ageing process essential in appreciating what we need to focus on to achieve more youthful lips • Identifying key components affected by ageing
  • 6.
    History of lipbeautification
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Introduction • Age, fashion,personal preference and cultural differences significantly dictate what patients desire • Lips are an essential component of a beautiful face as well as contributing functional roles in communication, speech, expression and intake of fluids and food
  • 9.
    Lip Function • Providemasticatory competence • Maintain oral seal • Indicator of general health ? • Soft tissue boundary for dentition • Tactile sensory organ • Speech articulation and phonetics • Facial expression • Erogenous zone - kissing
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Classification of 15Anatomical Lip Zones for Injection During Lip Augmentationa Figure Legend: Lip Anatomy
  • 12.
    Sensory Nerve Supply •Trigeminal nerve – v cranial nerve • Maxillary and mandibular branches
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    © 2014 TheAmerican Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. From: Complications of Injectable Fillers, Part 2: Vascular Complications Cadaver cross section through central third of lower lip. Note large size and superficial location of labial artery (arrow). Note proximity of the artery to buccal mucosa, posterior to the wet-dry line of the lower lip. This area is commonly injected when trying to evert the red lip during augmentation with hyaluronic acid fillers. Figure Legend: Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(4):584-600. doi:10.1177/1090820X14525035
  • 19.
    Depth of ILA Distanceof ILA from the ORAL VESTIBULE 4.7 mm Distance of ILA from the SKIN 2.3 mm Distance of ILA from the ORAL MUCOSA 1.5 mm
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Position of SuperiorLabial Artery
  • 22.
    Depth of SLA Distanceof SLA from the inferior border of the red lip* 6.7 mm Distance of SLA from the anterior border of the red lip* 7.6 mm Distance of SLA from the posterior border of the red lip* 3.2 mm
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Analysis of youthfuland ageing lips
  • 25.
    Clinical Analysis OfYoung Lips • Smooth mucosa • Defined cupids bow • Median tubercule with bilateral depressions • Corresponding small projections in lower lip • Small depression in lower lip opposite median tubercule of upper • Defined philtrum columns
  • 26.
    The tubercles ofthe upper and lower lips are natural areas of prominence that should be enhanced during lip augmentation.
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Clinical Analysis OfYoung Lips • In profile – short white lip with concavity • Upper lip projection further than lower
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Comparison of MRTimages of typical ‘young’ (left) and typical ‘old’ (right) upper lip. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Volume 61, Issue 10, 2008, 1170–1176
  • 34.
    The Ageing Lip •Loss of fullness and projection • Development of rhytids • Reduction in vermillion border • Flattening of cupids bow • Flattening of philtrum columns • Lengthening of cutaneous upper lip
  • 35.
    The Ageing Lip •Genetics • Sun exposure • Smoking • Thinning of musculature • Atrophy of subcutaneous fat • Dentoalveolar • Ligamentous laxity • Increase in skin laxity
  • 36.
    Lip Dimensions • Ideallip proportions 1:1.618 = roughly translates to 40% upper 60% lower lip
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Lip Dimensions –(Popenko 2011)
  • 42.
  • 43.
    FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS ISHIGHEST WITH AN AVERAGE +53% ENHANCEMENT OF LIP SA. Lip Dimensions
  • 44.
  • 45.
    Patient Assessment • Discussdesires and expectation • Inform on nature of filler and product used • Discuss longevity of filler • Possible side effects • Social downtime • Costs • Anaesthesia choice
  • 46.
    Patient Assessment • Asymmetry •Scar tissue • Lumps or nodules • Discolouration • Discrepancy in size pre operative • History of previous treatments • Document with photography • Informed consent signed
  • 47.
    Lip Augmentation • Understandclient expectations • Take before photos and have consent form signed • Shape of lips – check for asymmetry (front view and profile) • Peri-oral ageing Rhytids • Volume loss - perioral • Flattening of columella area
  • 48.
    Lip Augmentation • Architectureof Cupid’s bow and philtrum • Ratio of upper and lower lip (1:1.6) • Integrity of vermilion border and lip pigmentation • Decide on volumes before starting Swelling and bruising may alter appearance once injecting has begun
  • 49.
    Shape The shape influencesthe final result and cannot be drastically altered without looking unnatural. Proportion The upper: lower lip ratio should be close to 40:60 and never greater than 50:50 Lip Augmentation- key considerations
  • 50.
    Volume Lip volume mustbe appropriate to the age of the rest of the face and the size of the eyes, cheeks and jawline. Symmetry and feature enhancement Full philtral columns , a Cupid’s bow that is sharp and well defined. Symmetry is also important to the overall lip shape as is the presence or appearance of the Glogau-Klein point, and a defined vermilion border. Lip Augmentation-key considerations
  • 51.
    Lip Augmentation-key considerations •There is no single prescription for the “perfect lip” • No “one size fits all” technique • Basic template to achieve a fuller but more “natural look” • Can combine with neurotoxins and laser • Results depend on pre-existing anatomy and experience and skills of injector
  • 52.
  • 53.
    Teosyal pen • Worldsfirst motorized and cordless delivery of HA • Lightweight, ergonomic • Homogeneity and smooth filler delivery • Offers precision in delicate areas where natural results critical • Ease of use
  • 54.
  • 55.
  • 56.
    Teosyal Pen TEOXANE-MAIN CLINICALFINDINGS • Less painful injection compared to manual injection • Quicker recovery time • Less product used • Homogenous delivery • Precise dosage • High patient satisfaction • Lower extrusion forces on delivery
  • 57.
    Teosyal Pen ADVANTAGES • Lesspainful injection compared to manual injection • smoother delivery • Precise dosage • High patient satisfaction • Aesthetically, looks less intimidating than manual syringe • Portable
  • 58.
    Teosyal Pen DISADVANTAGES • Moreexpensive than manual syringes • Patient unease at electronic sound on injection
  • 59.