This document describes a career exploration program presented to learning disabled high school students. It included nine sessions using DISCOVER, a computerized career guidance system. Thirty-six students were in initial treatment and control groups. Variables like self-esteem, career decision-making, and job possibilities were examined. Students responded positively while counselors participated minimally and rated it least positively, possibly due to lacking competence in serving these students. The program aimed to address career needs of learning disabled students through cooperation of special education teachers and guidance counselors.
Child Assessment An Essential Component of Quality Early Childhoo.docxmccormicknadine86
Child Assessment: An Essential Component of Quality Early Childhood Programming
NAEYC Administrator Competencies Addressed in This Chapter:
Management Knowledge and Skills
4. Educational Programming
· Knowledge and application of different curriculum models, standards for high-quality programming, and child assessment practices
Early Childhood Knowledge and Skills
3. Child Observation and Assessment
· Knowledge and application of developmentally appropriate child observation and assessment methods
· Knowledge of the purposes, characteristics, and limitations of different assessment tools and techniques
· Ability to use different observation techniques, including formal and informal observation, behavior sampling, and developmental checklists
· Knowledge of ethical practice as it relates to the use of assessment information
· The ability to apply child observation and assessment data to planning and structuring developmentally appropriate instructional strategies
4. Curriculum and Instructional Methods
· Ability to evaluate outcomes of different curricular approaches
Learning Outcomes
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Contrast the characteristics of appropriate and inappropriate approaches to assessing young children.
2. Identify performance assessment strategies that are appropriate for documenting what children know and are able to do.
3. Describe some ways teachers of young children share their insights about what they know and are able to do with their families.
4. Discuss the origins of kindergarten readiness assessments, the challenges faced by those tasked with their development, and factors that make it difficult to compare states’ results.
Grace’s Experience
Grace’s many years as a classroom teacher gave her a great deal of experience observing and documenting children’s learning, growth, and development. She used what she learned through this process to inform her teaching and was able to develop portfolios based on her observations and documentation to describe children’s accomplishments to their families. Since becoming the program director, Grace has observed that some teachers collect very little documentation, mostly in the form of checklists and rating scales, to describe their children’s learning, growth, and development. She realizes she must use what she learned in the classroom to lead her teachers in the implementation of authentic, developmentally, and culturally appropriate assessment strategies that align with the program’s core values, mission, and vision. She is hoping this chapter will help her develop an assessment plan that will serve children, families, and staff well.
Child Assessment is the process that early childhood educators use to understand a child’s current development, what he knows, or what he is able to do. They use this information to describe children’s progress to their families and as the basis for decisions that they make at the classroom or programmatic level. As the program ...
Disrupted Futures 2023 | Wisconsin's career guidance projectEduSkills OECD
This presentation from the OECD Disrupted Futures 2023: International lessons on how schools can best equip students for their working lives conference looks at Career pathway programmes “Wisconsin’s Youth Voice in Career Readiness Research Project”. Presented by Karin Smith and Alexis Burgos.
Discover the videos and other sessions from the OECD Disrupted Futures 2023 conference at https://www.oecd.org/education/career-readiness/conferences-webinars/disrupted-futures-2023.htm
Find out more about our work on Career Readiness https://www.oecd.org/education/career-readiness/
Child Assessment An Essential Component of Quality Early Childhoo.docxmccormicknadine86
Child Assessment: An Essential Component of Quality Early Childhood Programming
NAEYC Administrator Competencies Addressed in This Chapter:
Management Knowledge and Skills
4. Educational Programming
· Knowledge and application of different curriculum models, standards for high-quality programming, and child assessment practices
Early Childhood Knowledge and Skills
3. Child Observation and Assessment
· Knowledge and application of developmentally appropriate child observation and assessment methods
· Knowledge of the purposes, characteristics, and limitations of different assessment tools and techniques
· Ability to use different observation techniques, including formal and informal observation, behavior sampling, and developmental checklists
· Knowledge of ethical practice as it relates to the use of assessment information
· The ability to apply child observation and assessment data to planning and structuring developmentally appropriate instructional strategies
4. Curriculum and Instructional Methods
· Ability to evaluate outcomes of different curricular approaches
Learning Outcomes
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Contrast the characteristics of appropriate and inappropriate approaches to assessing young children.
2. Identify performance assessment strategies that are appropriate for documenting what children know and are able to do.
3. Describe some ways teachers of young children share their insights about what they know and are able to do with their families.
4. Discuss the origins of kindergarten readiness assessments, the challenges faced by those tasked with their development, and factors that make it difficult to compare states’ results.
Grace’s Experience
Grace’s many years as a classroom teacher gave her a great deal of experience observing and documenting children’s learning, growth, and development. She used what she learned through this process to inform her teaching and was able to develop portfolios based on her observations and documentation to describe children’s accomplishments to their families. Since becoming the program director, Grace has observed that some teachers collect very little documentation, mostly in the form of checklists and rating scales, to describe their children’s learning, growth, and development. She realizes she must use what she learned in the classroom to lead her teachers in the implementation of authentic, developmentally, and culturally appropriate assessment strategies that align with the program’s core values, mission, and vision. She is hoping this chapter will help her develop an assessment plan that will serve children, families, and staff well.
Child Assessment is the process that early childhood educators use to understand a child’s current development, what he knows, or what he is able to do. They use this information to describe children’s progress to their families and as the basis for decisions that they make at the classroom or programmatic level. As the program ...
Disrupted Futures 2023 | Wisconsin's career guidance projectEduSkills OECD
This presentation from the OECD Disrupted Futures 2023: International lessons on how schools can best equip students for their working lives conference looks at Career pathway programmes “Wisconsin’s Youth Voice in Career Readiness Research Project”. Presented by Karin Smith and Alexis Burgos.
Discover the videos and other sessions from the OECD Disrupted Futures 2023 conference at https://www.oecd.org/education/career-readiness/conferences-webinars/disrupted-futures-2023.htm
Find out more about our work on Career Readiness https://www.oecd.org/education/career-readiness/
Establishing Trust Between School Teachers and University Facultynoblex1
The professional development school initiatives show the greatest promise in school reform due to collaborative efforts in teacher preparation. Educators in both public schools and in universities must work together in the preparation of teachers who are culturally, socially and instructionally responsive to student diversity. This lofty preparation aim begins with selecting the most promising teacher candidates for admittance into the program. The author describes an admissions procedure that has proven to be not only efficient and effective, but reflects the collaborative values of the program.
For over a decade, advocates of educational reform have supported professional development schools (PDSs) as a way for school and university partners to promote simultaneous renewal of both institutions. PDS aims are now commonplace: (a) provide exemplary education for preservice teachers, (b) support continuing professional development of experienced teachers, (c) engage in the renewal of curriculum and instruction, and (d) involve schools and universities in collaborative research.
Essential to these aims is the collaborative process. Establishing trust, recognizing cultural differences, and breaking perceived roles between school teachers and university faculty are key if partnerships are to be anything more than traditional in nature. University instructors, including teacher educators, are entering into cooperative working ventures with more frequency than ever before. Critical to the successful attainment of any partnership project are the people involved and the common commitment to program quality and coherence. In the ongoing process of developing, nurturing, and maintaining partnerships, one can expect to confront both predictable and unforeseen obstacles. Sharing information on program structures and systems will help advance the development of university and K-12 partnerships. The purpose of this article is twofold: (a) to describe, and (b) to analyze an admissions procedure, which reflects the values of the program and efficiently and effectively promotes the involvement of K-12 personnel in what is traditionally a university decision. To this end, we briefly discuss the history of this partnership and the key values that drive our work. Next, we elaborate on the admissions process and how it reflects those values in linking the university and schools. In taking stock of where we have made progress and where we have not, we examine the perceptions of major stakeholders in this process. We conclude with a discussion of recommendations to others considering similar efforts.
Source: https://ebookschoice.com/establishing-trust-between-school-teachers-and-university-faculty/
This is North Central University course OEL-7003-8 (week 8 assignment). It is a sample of a strengths and needs assessment. Components include data analysis, reliability and validity, learning strategies and tools, learning objectives and outcomes, self-directed learning, and standardized posttest. It is written in APA format, includes references, and has been graded by an instructor (A).
EDUC 8103-6: A6: Program Proposal Section 3: Transfer of Learningeckchela
This is Walden University course (EDUC8103-6) Section 3: Transfer of Learning and Section 4: Program Structure. It is formatted in APA, has been graded (A), and includes references. Most universities submit higher-education assignments to turnitin; so, remember to paraphrase. Enjoy your discovery!
This is a Walden University course (EDUC 8103), A8: Course Project—Program Proposal. It is written in APA format, has been graded by an instructor (A), and includes references. Most higher-education assignments are submitted to turnitin, so remember to paraphrase. Let us begin.
EDUC – 3003 Week 2Assignment 1
Ashley Ann Abron
Walden University
1)Pages 35-41 of Assessing and Guiding Young Children's Development and Learning outline four general decision-making categories of assessment. Briefly, summarize each of these. Identify when assessment for each category is most likely to be effective.
When simplified teachers use assessment into two categories (1) to use the information to work with their students individually/group and (2) to monitor their progress. To avoid being overwhelmed with information the assessment process follows four general decision-making categories. The first is Assessing to Know Children Individually and as Members of a Group. The one thing that individuals and groups have in common is that they each have their own approaches to what and how they learn. Teachers will have to maneuver working with both and how their attitudes and habits can affect their learning. Knowing the abilities of children individually as well as in a group will help the teacher to aid in their educational development and interest. Assessment will be most effective when a teacher can discern when to assess a child individually and when to asses as a group. In addition a teacher should know the strength of the individual and the group. If an issue is clearly limited to an individual there is no need to assess the whole class. Teachers should also keep in mind what can influence a child's behavior such as the environment, time of day, materials available, and other children.
Another general decision-making category of assessment is Assign Progress Toward Expected Outcomes in Development and Learning. This means that as children progress through their education it is expected that they meet certain requirements. Children are expected to reach certain milestones not only in their growth and development but also in their academic’s studies. To ensure that children are reaching these milestones assessments should be frequent can cover various aspects for them to be the most effective. The third general decision-making categories of assessment are Expected Child Outcomes in Major Development Domains. When assessing student’s teachers should focus on the major domains of child development; physical, social, emotional, and cognitive. Each domain is important to the overall development of growth of a child. For teachers to successfully assess each domain of a child is to record the progress of each, even if it isn't required.
Conclusively Expected Child Outcomes Stated as Standards is the last category of the assessment decision making. Organization in child education from state departments to school districts have written out specific academic and developmental standards for children of every age group. Standards are directed towards content and performance from the general to the specific. In this regard, assessment is most effective when it is flexible and comprehensiv.
Assessment of Future Needs, Costing the Future Needs.pptxDrHafizKosar
A difference between "what is" and "what should be" is referred to as a "need." The term "need" describes the difference between a desired condition (what should be) and the current situation (what is). The space between the present and the future is what is needed. Ideally, needs assessments are initially conducted to determine the needs of the people (service receivers for example parents, students) for whom the organization or system exists. It can be defined specifically as:
“Needs assessment sets priorities and determines criteria for solutions so that planners and managers can make sound decisions for achieving desired goals.”
1.3. What is Need Assessment?
Needs assessments (White, J., & Altschuld, J. 2012) focus more on goals and results than on the steps taken. For example, the goal might be students becoming good readers, and the steps include reading practice and effective teaching. Data is collected using common methods and strategies designed with specific goals in mind. The choice of methods depends on how well they fit the objectives and the specific situation of the need’s assessment. Priorities and criteria for solutions are established to help planners and managers make smart decisions.
1.4.1. Key Components of Assessment of Future Needs:
Here are some key components of future needs Assessment:
1. Demographic Analysis:
Understanding population growth, age distribution, and migration patterns to predict student enrollment and educational infrastructure requirements.
2. Technological Trends:
Evaluating the impact of emerging technologies on education, including the need for digital resources, online learning platforms, and technology infrastructure.
3. Economic Considerations:
Analyze the economic trends to anticipate funding availability and budget.
4. Global and Local Context:
Consider global and local trends in education to ensure alignment with international standards and competitiveness.
5. Societal Changes:
Examine societal shifts and values that may influence educational priorities, such as the emphasis on inclusivity, diversity, and evolving job market demands.
6. Educational Research:
Consider findings from educational research to inform evidence-based decision making and program development.2.7. How To Calculate Cost Analysis?
You can use these steps to calculate a cost analysis ratio:
1. Determine the reason you need a cost analysis:
When you do a cost analysis, how you use it depends on why you're doing it. Figure out why you need the cost analysis to know what things you should consider. For instance, if you're making a project budget, you might look at budget details from past projects.
2. Evaluate cost:
Now, let's look at the costs connected to the project. Make a list of all these costs, so it's handy for what comes next. Think about any surprise costs that might pop up and how the costs might change as time goes on.
Establishing Trust Between School Teachers and University Facultynoblex1
The professional development school initiatives show the greatest promise in school reform due to collaborative efforts in teacher preparation. Educators in both public schools and in universities must work together in the preparation of teachers who are culturally, socially and instructionally responsive to student diversity. This lofty preparation aim begins with selecting the most promising teacher candidates for admittance into the program. The author describes an admissions procedure that has proven to be not only efficient and effective, but reflects the collaborative values of the program.
For over a decade, advocates of educational reform have supported professional development schools (PDSs) as a way for school and university partners to promote simultaneous renewal of both institutions. PDS aims are now commonplace: (a) provide exemplary education for preservice teachers, (b) support continuing professional development of experienced teachers, (c) engage in the renewal of curriculum and instruction, and (d) involve schools and universities in collaborative research.
Essential to these aims is the collaborative process. Establishing trust, recognizing cultural differences, and breaking perceived roles between school teachers and university faculty are key if partnerships are to be anything more than traditional in nature. University instructors, including teacher educators, are entering into cooperative working ventures with more frequency than ever before. Critical to the successful attainment of any partnership project are the people involved and the common commitment to program quality and coherence. In the ongoing process of developing, nurturing, and maintaining partnerships, one can expect to confront both predictable and unforeseen obstacles. Sharing information on program structures and systems will help advance the development of university and K-12 partnerships. The purpose of this article is twofold: (a) to describe, and (b) to analyze an admissions procedure, which reflects the values of the program and efficiently and effectively promotes the involvement of K-12 personnel in what is traditionally a university decision. To this end, we briefly discuss the history of this partnership and the key values that drive our work. Next, we elaborate on the admissions process and how it reflects those values in linking the university and schools. In taking stock of where we have made progress and where we have not, we examine the perceptions of major stakeholders in this process. We conclude with a discussion of recommendations to others considering similar efforts.
Source: https://ebookschoice.com/establishing-trust-between-school-teachers-and-university-faculty/
This is North Central University course OEL-7003-8 (week 8 assignment). It is a sample of a strengths and needs assessment. Components include data analysis, reliability and validity, learning strategies and tools, learning objectives and outcomes, self-directed learning, and standardized posttest. It is written in APA format, includes references, and has been graded by an instructor (A).
EDUC 8103-6: A6: Program Proposal Section 3: Transfer of Learningeckchela
This is Walden University course (EDUC8103-6) Section 3: Transfer of Learning and Section 4: Program Structure. It is formatted in APA, has been graded (A), and includes references. Most universities submit higher-education assignments to turnitin; so, remember to paraphrase. Enjoy your discovery!
This is a Walden University course (EDUC 8103), A8: Course Project—Program Proposal. It is written in APA format, has been graded by an instructor (A), and includes references. Most higher-education assignments are submitted to turnitin, so remember to paraphrase. Let us begin.
EDUC – 3003 Week 2Assignment 1
Ashley Ann Abron
Walden University
1)Pages 35-41 of Assessing and Guiding Young Children's Development and Learning outline four general decision-making categories of assessment. Briefly, summarize each of these. Identify when assessment for each category is most likely to be effective.
When simplified teachers use assessment into two categories (1) to use the information to work with their students individually/group and (2) to monitor their progress. To avoid being overwhelmed with information the assessment process follows four general decision-making categories. The first is Assessing to Know Children Individually and as Members of a Group. The one thing that individuals and groups have in common is that they each have their own approaches to what and how they learn. Teachers will have to maneuver working with both and how their attitudes and habits can affect their learning. Knowing the abilities of children individually as well as in a group will help the teacher to aid in their educational development and interest. Assessment will be most effective when a teacher can discern when to assess a child individually and when to asses as a group. In addition a teacher should know the strength of the individual and the group. If an issue is clearly limited to an individual there is no need to assess the whole class. Teachers should also keep in mind what can influence a child's behavior such as the environment, time of day, materials available, and other children.
Another general decision-making category of assessment is Assign Progress Toward Expected Outcomes in Development and Learning. This means that as children progress through their education it is expected that they meet certain requirements. Children are expected to reach certain milestones not only in their growth and development but also in their academic’s studies. To ensure that children are reaching these milestones assessments should be frequent can cover various aspects for them to be the most effective. The third general decision-making categories of assessment are Expected Child Outcomes in Major Development Domains. When assessing student’s teachers should focus on the major domains of child development; physical, social, emotional, and cognitive. Each domain is important to the overall development of growth of a child. For teachers to successfully assess each domain of a child is to record the progress of each, even if it isn't required.
Conclusively Expected Child Outcomes Stated as Standards is the last category of the assessment decision making. Organization in child education from state departments to school districts have written out specific academic and developmental standards for children of every age group. Standards are directed towards content and performance from the general to the specific. In this regard, assessment is most effective when it is flexible and comprehensiv.
Assessment of Future Needs, Costing the Future Needs.pptxDrHafizKosar
A difference between "what is" and "what should be" is referred to as a "need." The term "need" describes the difference between a desired condition (what should be) and the current situation (what is). The space between the present and the future is what is needed. Ideally, needs assessments are initially conducted to determine the needs of the people (service receivers for example parents, students) for whom the organization or system exists. It can be defined specifically as:
“Needs assessment sets priorities and determines criteria for solutions so that planners and managers can make sound decisions for achieving desired goals.”
1.3. What is Need Assessment?
Needs assessments (White, J., & Altschuld, J. 2012) focus more on goals and results than on the steps taken. For example, the goal might be students becoming good readers, and the steps include reading practice and effective teaching. Data is collected using common methods and strategies designed with specific goals in mind. The choice of methods depends on how well they fit the objectives and the specific situation of the need’s assessment. Priorities and criteria for solutions are established to help planners and managers make smart decisions.
1.4.1. Key Components of Assessment of Future Needs:
Here are some key components of future needs Assessment:
1. Demographic Analysis:
Understanding population growth, age distribution, and migration patterns to predict student enrollment and educational infrastructure requirements.
2. Technological Trends:
Evaluating the impact of emerging technologies on education, including the need for digital resources, online learning platforms, and technology infrastructure.
3. Economic Considerations:
Analyze the economic trends to anticipate funding availability and budget.
4. Global and Local Context:
Consider global and local trends in education to ensure alignment with international standards and competitiveness.
5. Societal Changes:
Examine societal shifts and values that may influence educational priorities, such as the emphasis on inclusivity, diversity, and evolving job market demands.
6. Educational Research:
Consider findings from educational research to inform evidence-based decision making and program development.2.7. How To Calculate Cost Analysis?
You can use these steps to calculate a cost analysis ratio:
1. Determine the reason you need a cost analysis:
When you do a cost analysis, how you use it depends on why you're doing it. Figure out why you need the cost analysis to know what things you should consider. For instance, if you're making a project budget, you might look at budget details from past projects.
2. Evaluate cost:
Now, let's look at the costs connected to the project. Make a list of all these costs, so it's handy for what comes next. Think about any surprise costs that might pop up and how the costs might change as time goes on.
Similar to A Career Exploration Program For Learning Disabled High School Students (20)
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A Career Exploration Program For Learning Disabled High School Students
1. ED 321 197
'AUTHOR
TITLE
SPONS AGENCY-
PUB -DATE
NOTE
PUB TYPE
EDRS PRICE
DESCRIPTORS
ABSTRACT
"DOCUMENT RESUME
CG 022 641
Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro
A Career-Exploration Program_for Learning-Disabled-
High School Students.
American Association for Counseling. and Human
Development Foundation, Alexandria, VA.
87
48p.
Reports - Descriptive (141) -- Reports -
Research /Technical (143)
MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.,
*Careet Exploration; Careet Guidance; Computer Uses
in Education; Counselor Attitudes; Counselor Teacher
Cooperation; Grade 11; Grade 12; High Schools; *High
School Students; *Learning Disabilitie6; *School
Counselors; Special Education; Student Attitudes
A nine-session career exploration program was
presented by special education teachers and guidance counselors to a
group of learning disabled high school 11th and 12th graders in New
Jersey. The program included the use of DISCOVER, a computerized
career guidance system. Thirty-six students comprised- the initial
treatment and control groups. The Self-Directed Search, Career
Decision Scale, Self-Esteem-Inventofy, ant: a program evaluation form
were completed by the students. Teachers and counselors also
completed evaluation forms and submitted logs containing program
notes. The following variables were examined: self - esteem,- career
indecision, congruence, differentiation, number of identified job
potsibilities, and perceived usefulness of the proaraM. It appeared
that the program May have impacted'congruence, number of identified
job possibilittes, and career indecision. Students seemed to view the
program positively. Interestingly, counselors chose to-participate
minimally in the program and rated it least positively. It is
speculated that counselors may lack the competence to serve these.
students and may not see such activities as part .of their roles.
(Author)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
from the original document.
2. Career Exploration 1
A Career Exploration
Program for Learning Disabled
High School Students
Rosemarie Scolaro Mosey-, Ph.D.
Helene Fuld Medical Center
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Educational Research end Improvement
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION
CENTER (ERIC)
'ilia document has been reproduced as
received from the person or orgenizahon
onginating
0 Minor changes have been made to improve
reproduction qualify.
Points Of viewer ocemonsatated on this docu-
ment do not necessarily represent official
OERI Position or policy
"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS
MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
Sand i V1< <u ttz.
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)."
Running head: A CAREER EXPLORATION PROGRAM
2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE
3. Career Exploration
Abstract
A nine session career exploration program was
presented by special education teachers and guidance
Counselors to a group of learning disabled high school
eleventh and twelfth, graderd. The program included the
use of DISCOVER, a computerized career guidance system.
Thirty-six students comprised the- nitial treatment and
control groups. The Self-Directed Search, Career
Decision Scale, Self-Esteem Inventory, and a program
evaluation form were completed by students. Teachers
and counselors also completed evaluation forms and
submitted logs containing program. notes. The following
variables were examined: self-esteem, career indecision,
congruence, differentiation, number of identified job
possibilities, and perceived usefulness of the program.
It appgared that the pro4ram may have impacted
congruende, number-of identified job possibilities, and
career indecision. Students seemed to view the program
positively. Interestingly, counselors chose to
participate minimally, in the program and rated
it least positively. It is speculated that
counselors may lack the competence to serve these
students and may not see such activities as part of their
roles.
4. Career Exploration. 3
A Career Exploration Program for Learning
Disabled High School Students142'
With the advent of Public Law 94-!742, a
strong commitment was made to address the educational
needs of all students. Initially, efforts were
focused on identifying young, disabled children and
providing them with, appropriate academic
remediation. 'The greatest energies were invested in
areas of the greatest perceived need.
Disability, however, does not necessarily end in
the elementary school years. Thus, in high school,
this special population continues to demonstrate
educational needs which may be different from those of
nonexceptional students.
In particular, during the' high school years,
career education and exploration become a significant
area of concern for all students (Super, 1983). Yet,
little attention has been given to the career
development needs of students not the mainstream,
specifically, learning disabled students (Mori, 1980).
As a, result, few of these students are fortunate
enough to receive any structured career planning
(Biller, 1985).
Guidance counselors provide much of the available
career counseling tn high,school students. Their work
often focuses on scheduling classes and matching
students' to the best post-high school training programs.
Use of computerized career information programs
(Harris -Bowlsbey, 1984) has exted counselors in the
4
5. Carder Exploration 4
provision of career services. Yet the counselors
tools and the typical strategies they provide may not
be best suited for the learning disabled student.. In
order to identify the career planning needs of this
student, a number of factors should be considered.
First, the term "learning disability" may
indicate a wide range of learning difficulties which
are the result of weak selective attention skills' and
related characteristics such as hyperactivity,
distractibility, perseveration, and impulsivity (Ross,
1976). Choice of tools and strategies must be based
on the particular student's perceptual strengths and
weaknesses. For example, employing an interest
inventory which relies heavily on reading skills may
prove disasterous for a dyslexic student.
Second, guidance counselors, as well as school
systems, may assume that the special services
department should provide all educational services to
classified students. may result in special
education and resource room teachers bearing, the
burden of providing both academic training and career
counseling to these students.
Third, the self-esteem or self - concept, of
learning disabled children may be somewhat weaker than
that of other children (Ross, 1976). Bryan (1977)
revealed that learning disabled children tend to
receive more negative evaluations and experience more
negative social interactions than non-learning
disabled children. Self-esteem is a critical
component in the development of a self-concept.
5
6. Career Exploration 5
Self-concept is key to the development of vocational
maturity (Super, 1983). Thus, for learhing disabled
students, addressing self - esteem issues may be a
significantly crucial factor of any vocational
guidance service.
The program desctibed below attempted to address
the above career concerns and needs of learning
disabled high school students. Specifically, a nine
session career exploration program was adopted by a
central New Jersey high school. The program was
entered into the curriculum of junior and senior high
school students identified as "perceptually impaired"
and attending "resource room" classes.
The program_included exercises and homework
focusing on self-esteem, interests, decision-taking:
skills, values clarification, knowledge of the World
of Work, and exploring occupations. Also integrated
into the program was a computerized career guidance
tool, DISCOVER (ACT, 1987).
The integration of career program, for a special
population, into existing guidance and special services
was promoted. Both Directors of Special Services And
Guidance Departments acknowledged the need of such career
programs. The Directors looked forward to the
cooperation of both departments, of guidance counselors
and special education teachers working together to serve
this population. The Directors hoped that such a program
would encourage greater involvement Of guidance
counselors in serving learning disabled students.
Thus, this study was executed and is presented
6
7. Career Exploration 6
here as an exploration, as a look At what might or
might not,be effective in' a public-high school career
education program fok learning disabled students.
Specifically, the following variables were
examined: (1) how the program impadted (a) student's
self-esteem, (b) career indecigion, (c). congruence
(degree of correlation between a student's choice of
occupation and results on a career assessment tool),
(d) degree of differentiation (degree to which a
student exhibits Specific, clearly identified
interests and skills), and (e) the number of
identified job possibilities; (2) whether or not the
prograk was considered of benefit or usefulness to
students and faculty; (3) ho* such a program might
fit into the system of a public high school's
guidance and special education departments.
A research design was employed which simply
compared treatment and control groups after the
administration of the program to the treatment, roup
only. This research design although frought with.
Many threats to validity (Cook & Campbell, 1979) was
chosen as it appeared to be practical, feasible, and
least invasive, considering this particular field
setting.
Method
participants
The participants included thirty-two randomly
chosen eleventh and twelfth grade high,school
students identified as perceptually impaired. They
were attending the Lawrence High SchoOl in
8. Career Exploration 7
Lawrenceville, New Jersey in the Fall of 1987. The
group was randomly divided into treatment and
control groups, each containing eighteen students.
Mean grade point averages (GPA'S-) of the two
groups, were comparable (Treatment = 1.65';
Control = 1.86, based on a 4.0 scale; t(27) = .56
p>.35). Most recent available achievement scores
of the Comprehensive 'Test of Basic Skills revealed no
significant .differences between the groups in the
areas ofreading, t(27) = 1.98,, ip.05, language,
t(27) = 1.08, g>.05, and math,
t (27) = .02, Al2.05.
Four guidande counselors, and four resource room
teachers participated in the implementation of
the program. These faculty members described the
students as having weak reading skills, exhibiting
behavioral difficulties, and lacking greater motivation
than the nonexceptional eleventh and twelfth graders.
Materials
Counselors and resource room teachers received a
manual entitled, Career Exploration ur thl Resource Room
,;Appendix A) which outlined the entire program. These
faculty members were also given notebooks in which to
keep personal logs of the class sessions, of guidance
use, and of computer use. Students received folders
in which they maintained their class handouts, notes, and
computer printouts.
DISCOVER, a computer -based career planning
system. (ACT, 1987) was employed throughout the program
and ,used diming classes as well as on an individual
9. Career Exploration 8
basis. Although, students were encouraged to explore
DISCOVER as they wished,, specific modules were reviewed,
including: "1-Beginning the Career Journey", "2-Knowing
About the World of Work", "3-Knowing About Yourself",
"4-Knowing About Occupations to Explore", "5-Knowing
About Occupations"', and "6-Making Decisions About
Education".
Once the treatment group completed the program,
these students, teachers and guidance counselors
were asked to complete a general program ,evaluation
(Appendices B & C). Student Program Evaluations were
Written in simple language to facilitate easy reading.
Also at that time, all treatment and control group
students completed: (1) the Self Directed Search (SDS)
(Form E) (Holland, 1985), a vocational counseling tool
which assesses an individual's personal and job-related
interests, competencies; and perceived abilities.
The SDS form E provides an indiVidual with a 2 letter
occupational code. This code is-based on Holland's
model which categorizes all occupations into one,or
more of six categories: R(realistic),
I(investigative), A(artistic), S(social),
E(enterprising), and C(conventional). Form E provides
an easier reading level than the standard form;
(2) the Career Decision Scale (CDS) (Osipow, 1987),
an-inventory which measures indecision about one's career
path; and (3) the Culture-Free Self-Esteem Inventory
(SEI) (Form AD) (Battle, 1981), which assesses, levels of
self-reported self-esteem.
Procedure
9
10. Career Exploration 9
Prior to the implementation of the program, the
project coordinator, counselors, and teachers met twice
formally for the purpose of introduction, orientation,
and training. At these meetings, roles were discussed,
materials were reviewed, and DISCOVER was presented and
demonstrated. These faculty members were requested to
practice accessing the DISCOVER system and familiarize
themselves with its use prior to the program
implementation. The Manual outlining the class sessions
(Appendix,A) was discussed in detail.
Counselors were notified that they were to meet
individually with students at least twice during the
program, after Session 5 and between Sessions 8 and 9.
They were also asked to give career library tours and
be present during Session 3. Teachers were asked to
present the program on at least a weekly basis during
scheduled class time. They were also reminded to
present the program only to>treatment,group students.
The project coordinator distributed her work and
home phone numbers encouraging faculty to call with
feedback, questions, and consultation. The coordinator
also met with faculty and the Director of Guidance both
fcrma4y and informally throughout the program.
Control group students were informed that they would
be participating in the program after it had been
completed by the first group of studefits. Data selection
was scheduled to occur during the ninth session. After
the tredtment group completed the program and data were
collected by the teachers, the program and DISCOVER were
offered to the control group.
10
11. -Career Exploration 10
Results and Discussion
According to teachers and guidance counselors,
program implementation and data collection for a number
of students proved difficult. Reasons included, high
absenteeism, non-compliance, And student transfers,, to
other school districts. One student dropped out of
school temporarily to serve time in jail. As a result,
complete data was available for only twenty-five of the
thirty-six students comprising both treatment and control
groups.
Due to small sample sizes and the inconsistent data
collection (some students completed the SDS but not the
CDS and vice-versa), use of statistical analysis was
questionable. Nevertheless, descriptive data were
reviewed for possible trends with the above reservations
in mind.
Each teacher incorporated the program into the
weekly curriculum in her own way. Generally, one to two
sessions were covered every week during class periodi.
Due to high absenteeism in this group of students,
teachers attempted to present material to absent students
on an individual basis.
Mean scores of the treatment group and control
groups were calculated. Table 1 presents the means
Insert Table .1 about here
derived from available data and consequently.- different
sample Sizes.
TWo variables appear of interest, congruence
11
12. Career Exploration 11
and number of jobs the students considered exploring.
Congruence is the extent to which an individual's original
occupational choice is'consistent with his/her occupational
score on the SDS. For example, an individual may state that
he wants to become a social worker, an occupation which is
primarily "social" in nature. Yet, on the SDS Form E, his
two letter occupational code is clearly "RA", "realistic"
and "artistic". In this case, the degree of congruence is
low.
The SDS Menial (Holland, 1985) demonstrates how a
numerical value can be computed resulting in a
congruence score. The Iachian Index was employed with
only two letters, as opposed to the standard three
letters; as Form E resulted in two letter codes.
Table 1 reveals that the control group with a lower
n evidenced what seemed to be a visibly, greater degree
of congruence than the treatment group. Using the two
letter code, the congruence score displays a possible
range of 0 to 20. Here, the control group mean of 17
was the closest to the upper limit of 20-. One may
speculate why those who had not yet participated in the
program exhibited a more congruent mean score. The SDS
is a self-administered tool based, primarily one
self-perceptions. Could the Program have changed the way
the treatment group students perceived themselves, thus
promoting less congruence between self-perceptions and
what students had always-thought they would do?
A case in point was noted by a teacher and a
counselor. They each described how one male student had
always planned to work in construction. Yet, to his
12
13. Career Exploration 12
surprise, his classroom career exploration and
use of DISCOVER resulted in an assessment of values and
interests that led to other avenues of work. Perhaps
this program served to challenge students' perceptions
and expectations.
On the average, treatment stddents considered
exploring more jobs than control group students. It
may be that the program provided more career information
and job possibilities to the program participants than
available to the other learning disabled students.
The program did not appear to have much of
an impact on self-esteem, career certainty, or
differentiation, as determined by the SDS code.
Thus, treatment group students felt no more
confident in themselves than control group
students. This is not surprising as self-esteem is
multidetermined. A short, one-time career
program may result in little or no change in
self-esteem. Treatment students seemed no- more
certain about their career paths than controls.
Finally, both groups displayed almost equal
levels of differentiation, indicating that there was
almost no difference in the degree to which all the
students exhibited specific, clearly identifiable
interests and skills. Perhaps a continuous program of
career exploration integrated throughout the high school
curriculum might have a greater impact on these areas.
Students were also assessed as to their perceived
need for career intervention or assessment as measured
by the CDS. Table 2 reveals that 3 out of 12 treatment
13
14. Career Exploration 13
Insert Table 2 about here .
students felt little need for further intervention
compared to 0 out of 13 of the controls. None of the
treatment students indicated a high likelihood of need
for intervention whereas one of the control students did.
These data, although based on a restricted sample, may
support a trend which demonstrates that the program
helped meet a need for career exploration.
Only nine student program evaluations were collected
by teachers. Mean ratings are displayed in Table 3.
On a scale of one to five, where 1 = not at all and
Insert'Table 3 about here
5 = a lot, students revealed that they tended to enjoy
the career classes. Working with DISCOVER was perceived
as almost average in terms of enjoyment. Overall,
students rated the amount they learned about careers
(Item #3) about average, indicating they appeared to
acquire new knowledge. They further indicated that
they felt they received some help from the career
program. They also tended to recommend that other
students have a chance to participate in the program.
Student written comments revealed that the greatest
benefit of the program was gaining information about the
variety of occupations and about specific jobs. One
individual felt the program could have been condensed.
Another found the computer "confusing". This may well
14
15. Career Exploration 14
have been a result of reading difficulties.
Counselor evaluations and logs communicated some
interesting findings. Only three of the four counselors
returned their evaluations and logs. Of the 18 students
in the treatment group, only seven ever met with
a counselor. Three of these students met only once with
a counselor. The program had been designed so that
students would meet with their counselors individually on
at least two occasions.
According to logs and counselor/teacher interviews,
little consultation occurred between teacher and
counselor. Counselors did not visit classes or give
career library tours as instructed at the orientation
and as documented in Sessions 3 and 6.
Meetings with counselors during the program revealed
frustration with students for not attending scheduled
appointments. They also communicated their feelings of
being overworked and burdened with deadlines for student
college applications.
One counselor wrote, "I don't think the special
education population was a good one to use." Another
repeatedly referred to DISCOVER as DISCOVERY, revealing
an obvious unfamiliarity with the guidance system.
In contrast, teachers appeared to carry the
program. They also echoed the counselors' frustrations,
indicating that it was generally difficult getting this
group motivated, compliant, and in attendance for any
school subject.
Overall, teachers tended to rate the program more
highly on the teacher/counselor program evaluations
15
16. Career Exploration 15
(Table 4). Ratings for teachers averaged 3 and above
Insert Table 4 about here
for all items. Counselors exhibited average item ratings
of 3 and below.
Teachers recommended condensing the program to a two
or three day intensive workshop with no interruptions,
thus allowing these students, to focus their attention
without the distraction of other classes, holiday breaks,
and multiple absences. The teachers also thought that
such a workshop might provide more individualized
interactions with teachers.
The teachers noted that the use of DISCOVER
should be better tailored to meet individual student
needs. For some students, the reading level was too
difficult. Most needed much direction while using it.
Yet some felt quite comfortable at the computer and
couldn't wait to use it.
With respect to specific exercises utilized in this
career exploration program, teachers noted that the
values auction, decision- making skills, and coat of arms
exercises tended to be well-received (See Appendix A).
The values, action in particular seemed to challenge
students toward more realistic expectations about their
futures. Students also expressed their enjoyment of
the Self-Directed Search which was part of the data
collection.
Impressions and Conclusion
As so aptly phrased by Chubson (1985), "At this
16
17. Career Exploration 16
time, career exploration, guidance, and counseling for
children with disabilities is as1641phan art as it is a-
science (p. 49)-" Career development tneoryi has, for the
most partd'been based on the nondiiabled population
(Conte, 1983). Consequently, adapting such theory and
associated knowledge to any disabled population may often
result in a hit or miss state- of affairs.
The present study was an attempt to further our
knowledge and experience in this area as well as to
provide career services to a specific disabled
population in a public school setting. It revealed-the
difficulties of implementing a new program in a field
setting. Significant factors often affecting outcome, in
this case counselor participation, teacher- data gathering
techniques, school schedules, and student absenteeism,
were often beyond the control of the researcher.
Importantly, we must be reminded that the data
collected here and the observations made in the present
study are based on a small sample of students, teachers,
and counselors, in one school. Furtheimore, the
particular research design (post-test only
measurement) employed and its accompanying
threats to validity must be seriously considered
when examining any possible between group
differences. Thus, one must be cautious in making
generalizations to other populations and educational
settings.
Nevertheless, a number of comments made by teachers
and students supported the value-of repeating such a
program. Teachers unanimously remarked that having
18. Career Exploration 17
presented the program for the first time, they were
now better prepared and more confident to present it to
future students. Repeatedly emphasized was the
observation that what was effective for one student may
not have been for another. Whereas one teacher reported
that her students experienced difficulties understanding
DISCOVER because of their weak language skills, another
stated that DISCOVER was greeted with much enthusiasm.
Overall, teachers expressed interest in learning new
techniques and strategies to reach their students. For
these teachers, the program offered the opportunity to
acquire a variety of new tools which they could
selectively access and tailor to meet their students'
career needs.
Student reactions to the program may not have been
all too different from their reaction to any other newly
presented educational project. Yet it appe:ars that
students who participated increased their knowledge base
of occupations and were beginning to consider more job
possibilities. They may have felt less needy in their
career concerns than those students who had not yet
participated. They tended to rate the program
positively and recommend its use for other students.
Specific program exercises, such as the values auction,
were well received. Student expectations and perceptions
were challenged. Midprogram, one teacher wrote, "When
the students work with the computer and have to identify
their strengths and weaknesses..-.there is a lot of denial
on their part."
It was further recognized that many of the learning
-18
19. Career Exploration 18
disabled students were expected to be safely taken-under
the wing of their family businessei. Thus, career
exploration served to present possibilities where few had
been previously considered. Perhaps this is why the
treatment group students appeared pOsSibly less congruent
thap their control group counterparts. A similar result
was documented by Rosenthal (1985).in a' career
deveippment program for learning disabled college
students. He noted that as a result of the program,
students were- less likely to be influenced by faiily F.nd
peer pressures.
A critical observation, hoWeVerl-concerned.the roles
Of the guidance:Counselors and teachers in the career
education of this special population. Understandably,
the resource room teachers felt-most comfortable ,with
-their Students-and were most likely better. able to cope
with and accept the frustration Of serving them. Perhaps
these teachers-dte more realistic in their expectations
than the guidance counselors who have had relatively
little experience with these students.
Chuben (1985) has-noted how guidance counselors have
typically lacked the competence to serve this group. In
this study, counselors' minimal participation may have
been_a function of such a lack in competence.
Furthermore, the counselors' expectations may have been
unrealistic. Although they seemed to know that this
group exhibits high absenteeism and noncompliance, they
continued to interact with them as they would with other
students. For example, when students were abtent for
appointments,- they did not actively seek-them or even
19
20. Career Exploration 19
visit their classes for follow-up. They also openly
asserted to the project coordinator that they did not
want to be expected to do so.
Learning disabled students experiende multiple
failures in school. It is not uncommon for them to
exhibit accompanying behavioral and emotional
difficulties, especially during the adolescent years
(Santrock, 1986). Self-esteem levels are often quite
low. Counselors may need to alter their approach in
order to reach these students: Perhaps one cannot expect
these studentsto respond like other counseleei.
Counselors would do well to take a more active, direct
approach, coma out of their offices and join special
education teachers and their students in -the classrook.
Greater Consultation efforts-must occur between
these two groups of school personnel. Such efforts
would promote the spirit of thiiederal legislation of
P.L. 94-142 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Such programs might help(1) introduce counselors to
the special needd of such students, (2) emphasize an
active, direct. approach, (3) encourage consultation, (4)
provide counselors with specific career tools and
strategies, and (5) educate counselors about their role
as adVocates for the welfare of disabled individuals.
Future efforts might well focus on developing programs to
prepare counselors for career exploration with the
learning disabled.
20
21. Career Exploration 20
References
American College Testing Program (1987). Discover.
Hunt Valley, Maryland.
Battle, J. (1981). Culture-tree self-esteem inventory.
Seattle, Wash.: Special Child Publications.
Biller, E.F. (1985). Understanding Ana guiding thl
career development gf adolescents Ana young adults
with learning disabilities. Springfield, Illinois:
Charles C. Thomas.
Bryan, T.H. (1977). Learning disabled children's
comprehension of nonverbal communication. Journal
gf, Learning Disabilities. jQ (8), 501-506.
Carney, C.G. & Wells, C.F. (1987).. Career Planning.
Monterey, California: ,Brooks/ColePublishing Co.
Chubon, R.A. (1985). Career-related needs of school
children, with severe physical disabilities. Journal
o Counseling and-Development, 64 (1), 47-50.
Conte, L.E. (1983). Vocational development theories and
the disabled person: Oversight or deliberate
omission. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulleten. 2.,
316-328.
Cook, T.D. & Caipbell, D.T. (1979). Ouasi-experimentation:
Lod= Ana analysis issues for field settings.
Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Harris-Bowlsbey, J. (1984). The computer and career
development. journal 9.1 Counseling And Development.
ga (3), 145-148.
Harris-Bowlsbey, J., Spivack, J.D., & Lisansky, R.S.
(1977). Personal life and career planning.
Towson, Md: Towson State University Counseling
21
22. .Career Exploration 21
Center.
Ho4and, J.L. (1985). Self - directed = search. Odessa,
Fla.: Psychalogical Assesspent Resources, Inc.
Mori, A.A. (1980).. Career education for the learning
disabled-where are we now? Learning Disabilities
Quarterly. 3 (1), 91-101.
Osipow, S.H. (1987). Career decision scale. Odessa,
Fla.: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Rosenthal, I. (1985). A career development program for
learning disabled college students. 2prnal of
Counseling And Development. ga (5), 308-310.
Ross, A.O. (1976)., Tsychological aspects 2f learning
disabilities And reading disorders. New York:
McGraw Hill.
Santrock, J.W. (1984). Adolescence. Dubuque, Iowa:
Wm. Brawn Publishers.
Super, D.E. (1983). Assessment in career guidance:
toward truly developmental counseling. Personnel
And Guidance Journal. §1 (9), 555-561.
22
23. Career Exploration 22
'Footnotes
1This program was funded by an American Association
fok Counseling and Development Professional Enhancement
Grant. The use of DISCOVER was made possible for
this study free of charge, by the ACT Discover Center.
2
The author wishes to thank Terry Rosenthal,
Director of Special Services, Lawrence Township, NJ,
John Machulsky, Director of Guidance, Lawrence High
School, their personnel and students for their
cooperation and support.
23
24. Career Exploration 23
Table 1
Summary 21 kean Scores g2r Treatment And Control Groups
Measure Treatment Control
SEI total score 25.60 (n=15) 25.40 =14)
CDS certainty 34.15 (n=13) 34.92 (n=14)
SDS
congruence 13 (n=12) 17 (a=10)
differentiation 19.15 (n=12) 19.38 (n=13)
# of jobs students 3.66 (n=13) 2.83 (n=12)
considered exploring
24
25. Career Exploration 24
Table 2
perceived Need Igr Intervention gn og (n=25)
Treatment Control
Little felt need
for intervention
3 0
Further need for
assessment
9 11
High likelihood of
need for
intervention
0 1
Possible invalid
test data
0 1
n 12 1.3
25
26. Career Exploration 25
Table 3
studeilt Emu= Valuation mun Ratinos (a=9)
Quest ionb Mean :Score
1. How much did you enjoy the 3.5
classes on careers?
2. How much did you enjoy working 2.8
with DISCOVER?
3. How much more, do you know 3.0
about careers as a result of
this program than before?
4. How much did the career 3.0
program help you?
5. Would you recommend that other 3.2
students have a chance to take
this program?
a. Ratings ranged from 0-5, 5 being the most
positive rating.
b. See Appendix B.
26
27. Career Exploration 26
Table 4
Teacher/Counselor Program Evaluation Ratingsa
Counselorsc
Teachers
itemsb A B C A B C -D
1. overall value 2 3 2 3 3 4 4
of program
2. effectiveness 2 2 1 3 3 3 2
of DISCOVER
3. recommendation 2 2 1 3 3 2 1
for similar
students
4. program w/o 1 2 1 1 4 2 2
DISCOVERa
5. recommendation 3 4 2 3 3 4 4
for integration
into curriculum
6. student interest 2 1 4 4 3 3
in classes
7. student interest 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
in DISCOVER
a. Ratings ranged from 0-5, 5 being the most
positive rating (except for item #4, see
Appendix C).
b. See Appendix C.
c. Counselor D never returned evaluation.
27
28. Career Exploration 27
Appendix A
CAREER EXPLORATION PROGRAM
for the
Resource Room
NOVEMBER - DECEMBER, 1987
Rosemarie Scolaro Moser, Ph.D.
29. Career Exploration 28
Session 1
INTRODUCTION TO COURSE AND DISCOVER
1. Explain the idea of career exploration and the purpose of
this program: to think about and learn about career
possibilities. Not necessarily to find a job or make an
absolute decision.
2. Definitions:
JOB - a particular position you hole to earn money.
OCCUPATION - a field or area of work.
CAREER - the sum total of all your life experiences, work,
and nonwork.
3. Preent LIFE-CAREER RAINBOW.
Discuss the roles each of us occupies. Illustrate with
examples of friends, family.
4. Briefly present DISCOVER and encourage its use.
Take students through introduction.
5. Distribute folders in which to keep work.
HOMEWORK: Part or all of Module 1. Tell students they may or
may not wish to complete the CAREER JOURNEY.
29
30. Career Rainbow Sin wary Sheet
Career Exploration 29
Son/Daughter Your relationship to your parents or guardians
and the time and energy spent in it.
Student The time and energy spent in education or
training at any time in your life.
Worker The time and energy spent in work for pay at
any time in your life.
Spouse Your relationship with your husband or wife and
the time and energy spent in it.
Homemaker The time and management spent in taking
responsibility for home maintenance and
management.
Parent Your relationship with your children and the
time and energy spent in it.
-Leisurite The time and energy spent in leisure
activities.
Citizen The time and energy spent in civic, school,
church, or political activities.
Annuitant ..... The role in which replaces iorker, that is, the
time in life when individuals receive social
security, pension, and/or other types of
retirement income.
*From Personal Life & Career Planning (Bowlsbey, et al. 1979).
30
31. CAREER DECISION-MAKING
1. Decision-Making Styles
Present Planful Decider
Agonizing Decider
Impulsive Decider
Career Exploration 30
also Delaying
Discuss and employ all examples. Describe how this can
apply to all decisions, especially occupational.
2. Complete "Coat of Arms" exercise..
Discuss in class. May complete as homework.
31
35. Career Exploration 34
Directions for PERSONAL COAT OF ARMS
Long ago, families made personal coats of arms to identify
themselves to others. These coats of arms often showed some of
the family history and beliefs that were important to the
family.
In this exercise, you will'make your own coat of arms.
Attached to these directions is a blank coat of arms divided
into 6 parts. In parts 1 through 5, use only drawings to
express your thoughts. Follow the directions below.
Part 1: Make a drawing of one of the most important things
you've ever done.
Part 2: Make ,a drawing of one of the most important things your
-family has ever; done.
Part 3: Draw one or two things that people who care about you
say you should do for a living.
Part 4: Draw the thing you like most about yourself.
Part 5: Make a list of the tings you want most from.work.
Adapted from Carney & Wells, Career Planning (1987).
35
36.
37. Career Explorationl 36
Session 3
WORLD OF WORK
1. Present World of Work Map.
Show 4 work task areas
12 regions
25 job families
2. Guide clais through Module 2 on DISCOVER:
3. Stress availability of Guidance Counselors to discuss career
exploration throughout this program.
HOMEWORK: Complete Module 2.
***Note: Recommend Guidance Counselors to be present for
introduction/presentation.
38. 0
_JP
si~wel
Plasm
sk Woo Como bon
C. Novi Imo
vs Won
TUD WALD off* MOAK MAP
Career Exploration 37
*Ain with
DATA
PO 3
S. roves Naives%
ssmapft
V. too
us
X. to
04.04".
°Van
a. Good orb
80411440 isso
. Mow Ovovibee
t ave ashoon
olsoolo011
ammo
Misr. 4.. To $0400401
GPOOOs
C.moolAmboo4
Ikoosoom
0
2
tel. Num% sob
Ma
73 v. Mossios Gas sa
3 Goal Gowns
ti V. hole kavosowvo
2
4 sea
(10
WAIN sot
koota
vied;
1
4
MN
I-
&woof tot twos 60
Alsolaraosio-
I' II &Osamu
4.140w441.
0. woos/ . Ximoolomo t asoloo.
booms go""*"1119 11):
Colo w00. j.
e.
c
t osompoo ma Moo 0
loaroisos
4;r
i. Alevho Are
Wawa
lag wit210...0.41
WAS
From personal LifeA Career planning (Bowisbey et al.. 179).
0
38 .BES EVALIMI jui."
39. Career Exploration 38
Session 4
VALUES CLARIFICATION
LEARNING ABOUT YOURSELF
Values Auction Exercise
Each student is given $500.00. Bids begin at $50.00 with
minimum increase of $10.00.
Give students a few moments to plan their bidding strategies
and choose values before beginning the auction.
Discuss the results of exercises.
Did they get what they wanted?
What was most important for them?
Relate values to how one makes choices.
HOMEWORK: Begin Module 3.
39
40. Career Exploration 39
Values Auction
You,have a total of $500.00 to bid for any or all of the
following "work values ". "Work values" are things which people
might think are important toihave in a job. Bidding begins at
$50.00. When you bid over someone, you must bid at least
$10.00 more than the last bid. The list of values is below.
Think about what might be important to you in a future job. To
help you plan your strategy, you may put a number "1" next to
the most important work value, a number "2" next to the second
most important, and so on. REMEMBER, you can only spend
$500.00.
1. AMOUNT OF PAY
2. FRIENDLY WORKERS
3. PRESTIGE is IMPORTANCE
4. BEI }G YOUR OWN BOSS
5. PLEASANT WORK ENVIRONMENT
6. JOB SECURITY - little or no chance of being fired
7. PAID VACATION TIME
40
41. Career Exploration 40
Session 5
SELF-EXPLORATION
1. Discuss Module 3 results, printouts.
2. Assist with difficulties or questions.
3. Schedule guidance appointments.
HOMEWORK: Continue Module 3.
42. Career Exploration 41
Session 6
FINDING OCCUPATIONS
1. Trip to Career Library.
2. Introduction-to Directory of Occupational Titles &
Occupational Outlook Handbook.
HOMEWORK: Begin Module 4.
42
43. Career Exploration 42
Session 7
FINDING OCCUPATIONS (CONTID)
1. Discuss Module 4.
What occupations have students come across?
2. Have students choose at least 1 occupation to research and
present next time.
HOMEWORK: Research an occupation in Module 5 to present to
class.
44. Career Exploration 43
Session 8
CLASS REPORTS & WRAP UP
1. Students describe researched occupations to class.
2. Schedule appointments with Guidance Counselors.
3. General discussion about where students are now, compared to
the beginning of the program, with respect to thinking about
their futures.
HOMEWORK: Explore Module 6 and/or any other modules.
45. Career Exploration 44-
Session 9
DATA COLLECTION
1. Testing of Treatment and Control Groups.
Program Questionnaire (Treatment only)
Career Indecision Scale
Culture-Free SEI
SDS
2. Collection of folders and logs.
3. Background data.on students. including
name
sex
grade
teacher
acle
birthdate
GPA
achievement scores
**This session must occur after second, scheduled guidance
appointment.
Control students must not use DISCOVER until after testing.
46. Appendix B
Name Teacher
Date
Career Exploration 45
Circle one number for each question.
1. How much did you enjoy the classes-on careers?
1 2 3 4 5
/NOT AT ALL A LOT
2. How much did you enjoy working with DISCOVER?
1 2 3 4 5
/NOT AT ALL A LOT
3. How much more do you knbw about careers as a
result of this program than before?
1 2- 3 4 5
/NOTHING A LOT
4. HoW much did tie career program help you?
1
/NOT AT ALL
3 4 5
A LOT
5,. Would you recommend that other students have a
-chance to take this program?
1 2 3 4 5
,/NOT ALL DEFINITELY
6. What did you like most about the program?
7. What did you like least about the program?
8. How could this program be improved?
46
47. Appendix C
Teacher/Counselor-
Date
Career Exploration 46
1. Overall, how would you rate the value of this career
exploration program?
1 2 4 5
/LOW VALUE
2. How effective was the use of DISCOVER
students?
1 2
.HIGH VALUE
with your
4 5
/NOT AT ALL
EFFECTIVE
EXTREMELY
EFFECTIVE
3. Would you recommend this program for similar students?
1 2 3 4 5
/DO NOT RECOMMEND
RECOMMEND HIGHLY
4.. To what degree do you think your students would have
benefitted from the individual use of DISCOVER without
classroom support?
1 .2 3 4 5
/WOULD NOT WOULD BENEFIT
BENEFIT HIGHLY
5. To what degree would you recommend that such a career
exploration program, with the use of computerized
guidance, become integrated in the standard educational
curribulum?
2 3 4 5
/VERY LOW VERY HIGH
DEGREE DEGREE
6. How interesting did your students find the career
classes?
1 2 3 4 5
/NOT AT ALL
INTERESTING
47
EXTREMELY
INTERESTING
48. Career Exploration 47
Appendix C (cont'd)
7. How interesting did your students find DISCOVER?
1 2 3. 4 5
/NOT AT ALL EXTREMELY
INTERESTING INTERESTING
8. What did you like most about the program?
9. What did you like least about the program?
10. How could this program be improved?
48