Doina Draganescu, profile picture
Uploaded byDoina Draganescu
1,382 views

9. intel prez sesiune hw

This document discusses the benefits of refreshing server infrastructure with Intel Xeon 5600 series processors. It summarizes that refreshing 500 single-core servers with 30 Intel Xeon 5600 servers could save up to $100,000 per month by reducing software support, utility, and warranty costs associated with maintaining aging servers. The document encourages refreshing servers now rather than delaying to avoid limiting innovation and growth through maintaining outdated infrastructure. It provides examples of performance and efficiency benefits of refreshing to Intel Xeon 5600 servers from single-core and dual-core server environments.

Embed presentation

Downloaded 43 times
11 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor’s Driving Server Refresh Florin Raclariu Market Development Manager
2 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. This slide MUST be used with any slides removed from this presentation Legal Disclaimer • Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations • Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. • Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details. • Intel, processors, chipsets, and desktop boards may contain design defects or errors known as errata, which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request. • Hyper-Threading Technology requires a computer system with a processor supporting HT Technology and an HT Technology-enabled chipset, BIOS and operating system. Performance will vary depending on the specific hardware and software you use. For more information including details on which processors support HT Technology, see here • Intel® Turbo Boost Technology requires a PC with a processor with Intel Turbo Boost Technology capability. Intel Turbo Boost Technology performance varies depending on hardware, software and overall system configuration. Check with your PC manufacturer on whether your system delivers Intel Turbo Boost Technology. For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost • Intel Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, virtual machine monitor (VMM) and applications enabled for virtualization technology. Functionality, performance or other virtualization technology benefits will vary depending on hardware and software configurations. Virtualization technology-enabled BIOS and VMM applications are currently in development. • 64-bit computing on Intel architecture requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, operating system, device drivers and applications enabled for Intel® 64 architecture. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations. Consult with your system vendor for more information. • Lead-free: 45nm product is manufactured on a lead-free process. Lead is below 1000 PPM per EU RoHS directive (2002/95/EC, Annex A). Some EU RoHS exemptions for lead may apply to other components used in the product package. • Halogen-free: Applies only to halogenated flame retardants and PVC in components. Halogens are below 900 PPM bromine and 900 PPM chlorine. • Intel, Intel Xeon, Intel Core microarchitecture, and the Intel logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. • © 2009 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) logo is reprinted with permission
3 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® 5600 Energy Efficiency Building on Xeon® 5500 Leadership Capabilities 1 DDR3L supported for Xeon® 5600 only. System level power testing sing Samsung 1.35V DIMMs as compared to Samsung 1.5V DIMMs reduced power by 0.52W per DIMM at active idle, and 1.42W per DIMM under 100% load. Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load line. Power measurement at the wall using same system configuration; memory was the only variable changed. See backup for system configuration. Intel® Xeon® 5600 delivers greater platform Energy Efficiency Intel® Xeon® 5600 Intel® Xeon® 5600 Integrated Power Gates and Automated Low Power States with Six Cores Intelligent Power Technology 130W 95W 80W 60W (6C) 40W (4C) Up to 1.5W per DIMM reduction in memory power1 Lower Power DDR3 Memory Reduced power consumption through more efficient Turbo Boost and memory power management CPU Power Management Better performance/Watt Lower power consumption Lower Power CPUs Lower power CPU TDP options for Xeon® 5600
4 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced • 6.4 GT/s QPI • 8MB / 12MB • DDR3 1333 • Turbo Boost • HT Standard • 5.86 GT/s QPI • 8MB / 12MB • DDR3 1066 • Turbo Boost • HT Basic • 4.8 GT/s QPI • 4M cache • DDR3 800 80W L5640 6C 2.26 GHz1 Xeon® 5500  Xeon® 5600 Transition Xeon® 5500Usage Xeon® 5600 X5570 2.93 GHz X5560 2.80 GHz X5550 2.66 GHz E5540 2.53 GHz E5530 2.40 GHz E5520 2.26 GHz E5506 2.13 GHz E5504 2.00 GHz 95W 95W 95W 80W 80W 80W 80W 80W E5502 1.86 (2C) 80W X5670 6C 2.93 GHz X5660 6C 2.80 GHz X5650 6C 2.66 GHz E5640 4C 2.66 GHz E5630 4C 2.53 GHz E5620 4C 2.40 GHz 95W 95W 95W 80W 80W X5680 6C 3.33 GHz 130W E5507 2.26 GHz (4C) E5506 2.13GHz (4C) 80W 80W E5503 2.00 GHz (2C) 80W 60W 80W L5630 4C 2.13 GHz2 40W L5609 4C 1.86 GHz3 40W Xeon ® 5600 (Westmere-EP) SKUs Xeon ® 5500 SKUs LowPowerOptions X5677 4C 3.46 GHz 130W Freq-Optimized X5667 4C 3.06 GHz 95W Maximum Performance 6 Cores 4 Cores (freq optimized) Cost-Optimized Higher Frequency Xeon® E5500 SKUs Best Price Performance Higher Freq More Cache 1 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1333MHz 2 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz 3 SKU supports 4.80 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz, with Turbo and HT off. Oracle Validated CPU Option
5 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (AES-NI) Enables broad usage of encryption throughout the enterprise Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) Prevents the insertion of malicious software prior to VMM launch New Security Features with Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Ready for Today Prepared for Tomorrow
6 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. ― To help organizations protect data privacy at a lower cost, Oracle today announced a breakthrough in the speed of the Transparent Data Encryption feature of Oracle Advanced Security for Oracle® Database 11g Release 2 running on Intel® Xeon® 5600 series processor based servers with Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel AES-NI). According to benchmark results, Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Transparent Data Encryption shows 10x speedup in AES encryption processing rate and 8x speedup of decryption processing rate using 256 bit keys on Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor utilizing AES-NI as compared to Intel® Xeon® X5560 processor without AES-NI. ORACLE OPENWORLD, SAN FRANCISCO September 21, 2010
7 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Refresh and Future-Proof with Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series Xeon® 5300 Xeon® 5400 Xeon® 5500 2007 2008 2009 2010 Xeon® 5600 Intel® VT FlexMigrationRETIRE Refresh Your Pools to Support New Services and Business Growth Greater VM capacity / performance, lower power Intel® VT FlexMigration compatibility Advanced capabilities (Intel® VT, Intel® AES-NI, Intel® TXT) REFRESH Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.
8 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Technical Compute Servers Mainstream Enterprise Servers Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series Performance Summary Up to 63% performance boost over Xeon® 5500 Downbin int_rate fp_rate 1.00 1.20 1.21 1.25 1.44 1.61 1.63 Baseline Stream Computer Aided Eng. SPECfp rate 2006 Life Sciences LINPACK Black Scholes* 1.00 1.27 1.40 1.42 1.42 1.46 Baseline SAP-SD SPEC int_rate 2006 VMmark* SPEC_power Specjbb 2005 Up to 46% Performance JavaEnergy Efficiency ERP Integer Virtualization HPC CAD Financial Floating Point Memory Bandwidth Xeon 5600-EP (6C, 3.33 GHz) vs. Intel Xeon X5570 (4C, 2.93 GHz) Bandwidth Sensitive Frequency Sensitive Xeon 5600-EP (6C, 3.33 GHz) vs. Intel Xeon X5570 (4C, 2.93 GHz) Up to 63% Performance Life Sciences Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Source: Intel Internal measurements Jan 2010. See backup for additional details Virtualization
9 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Greater Datacenter Energy Efficiency 1 Source: Internal Intel estimates comparing Xeon® X5670 vs. X5570 SKUs using SPECpower. See backup for system configurations. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Maximize Performance or Energy Efficiency RelativePerformance andSystemPower Xeon® 5570 vs. Xeon® L5640 Power and Performance Comparison X5570 (4C) 2.93GHz 95W L5640 (6C) 6C, 2.26GHz 60W Peak power under load (W) Performance Same Performance Up to 30% Lower Power1
10 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. ~76% of the server install base is still up for refresh Estimated 34% single-core and 42% dual-core1 Server Refresh Opportunities in 2010 IDC believes replacement cycles being delayed from 3-4 years to every 4-5 years. Source IDC, 2009 Source: Gartner press release http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1209913 Approximately 1 million servers have had their replacement delayed by a year. Maintaining Aging Servers Limits Innovation & Growth Now is the Time to Refresh! If you delayed refresh in 2009, then you’re not alone 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 single core dual core four core + Source: Intel. Intel® Xeon® shipments, 2005-2009. 2010 will mark an important return to installed base refreshes driven by an uptick in enterprise budgets, new technological innovations, and a return to economic growth. Source: IDC, February 2010 Approximately 1 million servers have had their replacement delayed by a year. Source: Gartner press release http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1209913 1 Source: IDC 2009 Q4 Server Tracker. Install base calculated by using this IDC data and a standard life-cycle distribution, and assumes 4- to 5-year replacement cycle in 2008 and 2009 when the recession hit.
11 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 2010 Efficiency Refresh 15:1 As Low as 5 Month Payback 95% Annual Energy Cost Reduction (estimated) 1 rack of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based Servers Performance Refresh 1:1 Up to 15x Performance 15 racks of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based Servers 8% Annual Energy Costs Estimated Reduction (estimated) 2005 15 racks of Intel® Xeon® Single Core Servers Server Refresh: 2010 Single Core  Xeon® 5600 – OR – Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. Dual core refresh Refresh benefits for smaller deployments
12 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Refresh 1:1 Up to 5x Performance 5 racks of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based Servers 10% Annual Energy Costs Estimated Reduction (estimated) 2006 2010 Efficiency Refresh 5:1 As Low as 15 Month Payback 85% Annual Energy Cost Reduction (estimated) 1 rack of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based Servers 5 racks of Intel® Xeon® Dual Core Servers – OR – Server Refresh: 2010 Dual Core  Xeon® 5600 Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. Back
13 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. The Cost of Waiting in 2010 Refresh: If Not NOW, When? Monthly costs for NOT refreshing 500 Single-core Servers with 30 Intel® Xeon® 5600 Servers up to $100,000per month1 $50,920per month Software support: Utility costs: $18,380per month $31,250per month Warranty costs: 1 Monthly Savings in utility and SW support costs determined by comparing the incremental costs associated with not refreshing 50 older single-core servers purchased back in 2005 vs. refreshing on an approximate 15:1 ratio with a Xeon 5680-based servers in Year 1. Warranty cost assumes $750/year per server if purchased after the initial OEM 3-year warranty period has expired. Actual total cost is $100,750. Source: Consolidation ratio calculated using the Xeon Server Refresh Savings Estimator (www.intel.com/go/xeonestimator) and uses publicly available RHEL OS support costs, default utility settings, and SPECint*_rate_base2006 performance and power data for the Xeon® X5680 as found in the backup. See the backup for system configurations.
14 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Sun Fire X4470 Nehalem EX 4-socket 512 GB Sun Fire X4800 Nehalem EX 8-socket 1 TB Sun Fire X2270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 96GB Sun Netra X4270 Nehalem EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Blade X6275 Nehalem EP 4-socket 192 GB Sun Blade X6270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4170 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Oracle Exadata Database Machine X2-8 Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud Westmere EP Nehalem EX 8-socket 1 TB
15 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Business Processing (DB, ERP, CRM, batch) Decision Support (data warehouse, Business Intelligence) Large-scale Virtualization Traditional Big Server Usages Source: Internal Intel assessment & 2009 IDC Server Workloads Forecast and Analysis Study Application Development High Performance Computing Collaboration Web Infrastructure IT Infrastructure Volume 2-socket Servers Bigger Servers The Most Demanding Applications Require Big Server Capabilities
16 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Technology Advantages Nehalem architecture 72 PCIe Gen2 lanes Xeon® 7500 Nehalem Generation Intel® Microarchitecture ICH 10/10R Intel® 82599 10GbE Controller 8-cores 24MB Shared L3 Cache 64 DIMM slots support up to 1 terabyte of memory (4 sockets) Scaling from 2-256 sockets Intel Virtualization Technologies Mission Critical Class Reliability features Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer Memory Intel® 7500 Chipset PCI Express* 2.0 Xeon® 7500 Xeon® 7500 Xeon® 7500 Xeon® 7500
17 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500/6500 Series Product Options + 1066 Mhz frequency runs at an effective frequency of 978 Mhz when run at 5.86GHz SMI link speed ¥Max Scale Glueless: Scaling capability refers to maximum supported number of CPUs in a ―glueless‖ Boxboro-EX platform (e.g. 8 skt means this SKU can be used to populate up to 8 sockets in a single system) **Max Turbo Boost frequency based on number of 133 MHz increments above base freq (+2 = 0.266 GHz, +3 = 0.400 GHz) ***E6510 may not be scaled above 2 sockets even with a customer node controller 8 and 4 socket/ Scalable Advanced features available on higher end processors Usage Processor Number/Freq ¥Max Scale Glueless Cores/ Threads Cache QPI Speed Max Mem Speed TDP ** Turbo HT Advanced X7560 (2.26GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  X7550 (2 GHz) 8 skt 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Standard X7542 (2.66GHz) 8 skt 6/6 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 130W +1 No E7540 (2 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 105W +2  E7530 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 12M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E7520 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 4/8 18M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 95W No Turbo  Low Voltage L7555 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  L7545 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  Usage Processor Number/Freq ¥Max Scale Glueless Cores/ Threads Cache QPI Speed Max Mem Speed TDP ** Turbo HT Advanced X6550 (2 GHz) 2 skt 8/16 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Standard E6540 (2 GHz) 2 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E6510 (1.73 GHz) 2 skt only 2 skt*** 4/8 12M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 105W No Turbo  2 socket/ Scalable
18 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Hyper-threading Technology Increases performance for threaded applications delivering greater throughput and responsiveness Higher Performance For Threaded Workloads Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Increases performance by increasing processor frequency and enabling faster speeds when conditions allow Performance Enhancements Intel® Xeon® 7500 Series Processor Core0 Core1 Core8 Core0 Core1 Core8 Core0 Core1 Frequency All cores operate at rated frequency All cores operate at higher frequency Fewer cores may operate at even higher frequencies 8C Turbo Normal <8C Turbo … … … Higher Performance on Demand
19 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 3x average improvement Average of 3x performance improvement over 7400 series across a range of benchmarks 1.0 2.51 2.64 2.77 3.19 3.43 3.70 3.87 8.24 Xeon® X7460 Baseline SPECjAppServer*2004 SPECint*_rate_base2006 TPC Benchmark* E SPECjbb*2005 SAP* SD 2-tier VMmark* SPECfp*_rate_base2006 Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 series-based Servers 4S Standard Benchmarks Performance Summary Intel®Xeon®ProcessorX7560 Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Source: Best published / submitted results comparison of best 4-socket Xeon X7460 and X7560 models as of 7 May 2010. See previous “Broad Performance Claim” foil and notes for more information. HPC Consolidation Xeon X7460 = Intel Xeon processor X7460 (16M Cache, 2.66GHz, 1066MHz FSB, formerly codenamed Dunnington) Xeon X7560 = Intel Xeon processor X7560 (24M Cache, 2.26GHz, 6.40GT/s Intel® QPI, formerly codenamed Nehalem-EX) Relative results Higher is better
20 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 4S Enterprise Standard Benchmarks Comparison to 2S Xeon® 5600 Series Source: Best published results on SPEC.org or VMware.com as of 29 March 2010. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Up to 2.2x the performance of Xeon® 5600 1.95 2.01 2.04 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.17 2.19 1.00Xeon® X5680 Baseline SPECompM*2001 VMmark* SPECint*_rate_base2006 SPECmpi*2007 SAP* SD 2-tier SPECjAppServer*2004 SPECjbb*2005 SPECfp*_rate_base2006 Relative results Higher is better 4S/64TIntel®Xeon®ProcessorX7560(24M Cache,2.26GHz,6.40GT/sIntel®QPI) Xeon® 7500 and Xeon® 5600 benchmark results represent best top-bin published results as of 29 March 2010. See notes for details. (6C, 12M Cache, 3.33GHz)
21 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced RAS Starts With Silicon Requires An Ecosystem Mission Critical Solutions Span Silicon, Firmware & OS Mission Critical OS Oracle Innovation Intel Silicon
22 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Memory • Inter-socket Memory Mirroring • Intel® Scalable Memory Interconnect (Intel® SMI) Lane Failover • Intel® SMI Clock Fail Over • Intel® SMI Packet Retry • Memory Address Parity • Failed DIMM Isolation • Memory Board Hot Add/Remove • Dynamic Memory Migration* • OS Memory On-lining * • Recovery from Single DRAM Device Failure (SDDC) plus random bit error • Memory Thermal Throttling • Demand and Patrol scrubbing • Fail Over from Single DRAM Device Failure (SDDC) • Memory DIMM and Rank Sparing • Intra-socket Memory Mirroring • Mirrored Memory Board Hot Add/Remove Advanced Reliability Starts With Silicon Xeon® 7500 Reliability Features Bold text denoted new feature for Xeon® 7500 * Feature requires OS support, check with your OS vendor for support plans Some features require OEM server implementation and validation and may not be provided in all server platforms Over 20 New RAS features across the entire platform I/O Hub • Physical IOH Hot Add • OS IOH On-lining* • PCI-E Hot Plug CPU/Socket • Machine Check Architecture (MCA) recovery • Corrected Machine Check Interrupt (CMCI) • Corrupt Data Containment Mode • Viral Mode • OS Assisted Processor Socket Migration* • OS CPU on-lining * • CPU Board Hot Add at QPI • Electronically Isolated (Static) Partitioning • Single Core Disable for Fault Resilient Boot Intel® QuickPath Interconnect • Intel QPI Packet Retry • Intel QPI Protocol Protection via CRC (8bit or 16bit rolling) • QPI Clock Fail Over • QPI Self-Healing
23 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. HW Un-correctable Errors Machine Check Architecture Recovery First Machine Check Recovery in Xeon®-based Systems Previously seen only in RISC, mainframe, and Itanium-based systems *Errors detected using Patrol Scrub or Explicit Write-back from cache Allows Recovery From Otherwise Fatal System Errors Normal Status With Error Prevention System Recovery with OS Error Corrected Error Detected* Error Contained HW Correctable ErrorsUn-correctable Errors System works in conjunction with OS or VMM to recover or restart processes and continue normal operation Bad memory location flagged so data will not be used by OS or applications Error information passed to OS / VMM MCA Recovery
24 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Efficiency Refresh 20:1 Up to 92% Annual Energy Costs Reduction (Estimated) 1 Rack of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based Servers As Little as 12 months Payback (Estimated) Server Refresh Benefits Single Core  Xeon® 7500 Source: Intel measurements as of March 2010 of Xeon 7500 and single-core 4-socket systems. Performance comparison using SPECint_rate_base2006. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. – OR – 2010 Performance Refresh 1:1 Up to 20x Performance (Estimated) 20 Racks of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based Servers 2005 20 Racks of Intel® Xeon® Single Core Servers
25 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Refresh 1:1 Up to 36x Performance (Estimated) 36 Racks of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based 8- socket Servers 2010 Efficiency Refresh 36:1 Up to 91% Annual Energy Costs Reduction (Estimated) 1 Rack of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based Servers As Little as 14 months Payback (Estimated) Server Refresh & Consolidate Single Core 4-socket  Xeon® 7500 8-socket Source: Intel measurements as of March 2010 of Xeon 7500 and single-core 4-socket systems. Performance comparison using SPECint_rate_base2006. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. – OR – 2005 36 Racks of Intel® Xeon® Single Core, 4-socket Servers
26 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Oracle Database with Intel Xeon® 7500 When simplification & cost reduction for your DB environment is your goal Source: Intel estimates as of February 2010. Performance comparison using internal workload. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software 2010: 2 servers2005: 30 servers Single Core 15:1 New Xeon® 7500 series ~$70k HW Investment As low as 4 Month Estimated Payback Business BENEFITS Over 4 years Lower Operating Costs $200K Power / Cooling SAVINGS Lower Software Costs $1.28M SW Licensing SAVINGS Floor Space 94% REDUCTION Annual Energy Costs 90% REDUCTION IT BENEFITS
27 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Enhancing Platform Value Beyond the Processor 1 Based on Intel internal results. Actual results may vary significantly based on workload and product configurations. See backup for more details on the results. Impact1 • Up to 46X lower power • Lower TCO (fewer drives) • Up to 6X read perf improvement Impact1 • Up to 10X increase IO bandwidth • >5X port count reduction • Up to 4.5X power per Gb reduction Network Optimizations • Unified networking • Eliminate switches/cables • Scalable with multi-core CPUs Solid State Drives • Lower power consumption • No moving parts • Dramatic performance increases Intel® 10GbE Intel® X25-M SSDs
28 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Sun Fire X4470 Nehalem EX 4-socket 512 GB Sun Fire X4800 Nehalem EX 8-socket 1 TB Sun Fire X2270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 96GB Sun Netra X4270 Nehalem EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Blade X6275 Nehalem EP 4-socket 192 GB Sun Blade X6270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4170 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Oracle Exadata Database Machine X2-8 Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud Westmere EP Nehalem EX 8-socket 1 TB
29 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Sun Fire X4800 New World Record - SAP Sales and Distribution Parallel Standard Application Benchmark (September 20, 2010) New World Record - SPEC OMP2001 Benchmark (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SPEC OMP2001L Benchmark (June 28, 2010) Sun Fire X4470 New World Record - SPECint_rate2006 (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SPECfp_rate2006 (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SPECjbb2005 (June 28, 2010) Source - http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/performance-scalability/sun- x86-systems-gateway-082396.html
30 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Best In Class Building Blocks For the 21st Century Data Centre
31 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.
3232 Xeon 7500 series delivers more on-line server transactions than X7460 and is up to 50% faster than AMD & 25% cheaper per transaction! Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 series-based Server platforms 4S On-Line Transaction Processing (OLTP) Warehouse Database Performance Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, Go to: http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/benchmark_limitations.htm. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Xeon X7460 – Intel® Xeon® Processor X7460 (“Dunnington 2.66GHz”, Six-Core) Xeon X7560 – Intel® Xeon® Processor X7560 (“Nehalem-EX 2.26GHz”, Eight-Core) Opteron 6176SE – AMD Opteron* Model 6176SE (“Magny-Cours 2.30GHz”, 12-Core) 318,407 516,752 639,253 1,807,347 1,193,472 Xeon 7140 (4P/8C/16T, 16M, 3.40GHz, 800MHz FSB) Xeon X7350 (4P/16C/16T, 8M, 2.93GHz, 1066MHz FSB) Xeon X7460 (4P/24C/24T, 16M, 2.66GHz, 1066MHz FSB) Xeon X7560 (4P/32C/64T, 24M, 2.26GHz, 6.4GT/s QPI) Opteron 6176SE (4P/48C/48T, 12M, 2.3GHz) TPC Benchmark* C Faster database servers for Online Transactions Transactions per minute C Higher is better Source: Comparison based on results published at www.tpc.org as of 25 August 2010. See notes or backup section for configuration details. 2.8x P=Processors, C=Cores, T=Threads Xeon 7140 – Intel® Xeon® Processor 7140 (“Tulsa 3.40GHz”, Dual-Core) Xeon X7350 – Intel® Xeon® Processor X7350 (“Tigerton 2.93GHz”, Quad-Core) 256GB 1,024GB 512GB $2.59/ tpmC $1.88/ tpmC $0.97/ tpmC $0.49/ tpmC $0.68/ tpmC
33 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Claim Backup 60% Performance, 40% Perf/Watt, and 30% Lower Power • Up to 1.6x performance compared to Xeon 5500 series claim supported by a CPU intensive benchmark (Blackscholes). Intel internal measurement. (Feb 25, 2010) – Configuration details: - Blackscholes* – Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds. – New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds. • Up to 40% higher performance/watt compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor 5500 Series claim supported by performance results on a server side java benchmark in conjunction with power consumption across a load line. Intel internal measurement (Jan 15, 2010) – Baseline platform: Intel preproduction server platform with two Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® processor X5570, 2.93 GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4QPI, 8GB memory (4x2GB DDR3-1333), 1 PSU, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2. Intel internal measurement as of January 15,2010. – New platform: Intel preproduction server platform with two six-Core Intel® Xeon® processor X5670, 2.93 GHz, 12MB L3 cache, 6.4QPI, 8GB memory (4x2GB DDR3-1333), 1 PSU, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2. Intel internal measurement as of January 15, 2010. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5600 series with Intel microarchitecture Nehalem delivers similar performance as previous-generation servers but uses up to 30 percent less power – Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark: - Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S5 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor sX5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev. R1.09 , Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 5 x Fans, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Fujitsu MBD2147RC 147GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, 1x800W PSU, SLES 11 (X86_64) Kernel 2.6.27.19-5-default. Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 250. http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=0140b19d-56e3-4b24-a01e-26b8a80cfe53 – New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Hex-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev R1.00A , Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 5 x Fans, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 LV DR registered ECC), 1 x Fujitsu MBD2147RC 147GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, 1x800W PSU, SLES 11 (X86_64) Kernel 2.6.27.19-5-default. Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 250 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=4af74e10-24b1-4cf8-bb3b-9c4f5f177389
34 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Summary Backup Mainstream Server Benchmarks 42% gain on Single Node server SPECpower*_ssj2008 at similar power level over previous generation processors supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Referenced as published at 2053 overall ssj_ops/watt http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q4/power_ssj2008- 20091023-00205.html • New Configuration and Score: IBM x3650 M3 was configured with the Intel Xeon Processor X5670 (2.93GHz, 256KB L2 cache per core, 12MB L3 cache per processor—12 cores/2 chips/6 cores per chip) and 12GB of PC3L-10600R(6 x 2GB) memory and ran IBM Java™6 Runtime Environment and Microsoft® Windows® Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition. Score: 2,927 overall ssj_ops/watt. Submitted and in review at www.spec.org 46% gain on SPECjbb2005 supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 632,425 bops, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 158106 http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2005/results/res2010q1/jbb2005-20100210- 00803.html • New Configuration and Score: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, Data Reuse Optimization disabled, all prefetchers disabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Seagate 73GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows Server 2008 amd64-64 jvmwa6460sr6-20090923_42924). Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECjbb2005 score: bops= 928393, bops/JVM= 154732 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=71488796-7a53-46b8-9163-61373214c2ef 27% boost on SAP ERP 6.0 Unicode over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 3800 Number of SAP SD benchmark users http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C259FFE6AB54898440C838DED66684AFD7D58B23A917F4C0D • New Configuration and Score : Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), 88 GB main memory, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2008, SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode). Source: www.sap.com Score: 4860 Number of SAP SD benchmark users 40% gain on SPECint_rate_2006 over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Score: 253 • http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100202-09561.html • New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 12 workloads: 355 42% gain on VMMark* over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Cisco result referenced as published at 25.06 at 17 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Cisco-2010-01-12-B200M1.pdf • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Cisco UCS B250 M2 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, 6-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 192GB memory (48x4GB DDR3 1333), EMC CLARiiON CX4-240 storage system with 25x73GB SSD, 20 x 450GB 15K RPM, 5 x 300GB 15K RPM, VMware vSphere 4,0 U1 Source: www.cisco.com. Score of 35.83@26 tiles. For more information see: www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/ps10265/at_work_promo.html#~industry_benchmarks.
35 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Summary Backup Technical Computing Benchmarks • STREAM: Baseline Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing TR1012. Score of workloads: 36588.0 MB/s New Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: MB/s. • CAE: Baseline Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications New Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications • SPECfp_rate: 25% gain on SPECfp_rate_base2006 over previous generation supported by the following: Baseline Configuration and Score: Score 197, Referenced as published at http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q2/cpu2006-20090511-07354.html New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 17 workloads: 248. • LIFE SCIENCES: Baseline Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications New Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications • LINPACK: Baseline Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 02/23/2009, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U3 kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 for x86_64). Source: Intel internal testing TR1011A. Score of workloads: 91 GFlops. New Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex- core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 146 GFlops. • BLACKSCHOLES*: Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds. New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds.
36 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 5 Month Single Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back Up • 5 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Single Core Intel® Xeon® 3.80 with 2M L2 Cache and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 15x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon Processor 3.80Ghz with 2M L2 Cache, 800 FSB, 8x1GB DDR2-400 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
37 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Single Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel® Xeon® 3.8GHz with 2M cache Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz) Performance per Server 1 Up to 15x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power Idle / Active Power 228W idle / 382W active 117W idle / 383W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 315 21 ~ 15:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 15 racks 1 rack 15:1 Rack Consolidation Annual Server kWh 772,904 37,938 Up to 95% lower energy costs Total Annual Energy Costs $154,581 $7,588 $146,993 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor Operating System Licensing Costs $283,500 $18,900 $264,600 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $411,593 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 5 months
38 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 15 Month Dual Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back up • 15 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Dual Core Intel® Xeon® 5160 (3.0GHz) and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 5x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two Dual-core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160, 3.33GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 8x2GB FBDMIMM DDR2-667 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
39 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Dual Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel Xeon 5100 series (3.00GHz) Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz) Performance per Server 1 Up to 5x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power Idle / Active Power 252W idle / 354W active 117W idle / 383W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 105 21 5:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 5 racks 1 rack 5:1 Rack Consolidation Annual kWhr 281,883 37,938 Estimated 85% lower energy costs Annual Energy Costs $56,376 $7,588 $45,169 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor OS Licensing Costs $94,500 $18,900 $75,600 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $120,769 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 15 months
40 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 283.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 334.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 269.0. • X5660: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 326.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 316.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 218.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 211.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 143.0. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 137.0. • E503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.9. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 259.0.
41 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECfp_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 247.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 213.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 235.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 206.0. • X5660: upermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 232.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 171.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 168.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 164.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 119.8. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 117.0. • E5503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.6. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 189.0.
42 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Xeon® L5600 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 269 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10097.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 181 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10131.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 136 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10135.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 193 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10098.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 134 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10132.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 116 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10136.html Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of April 16, 2010
43 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Xeon® L5500 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 194 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08776.html – L5520: UCS C210 M1.Score: 188 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100119-09411.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 133 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08772.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System x3550 M2. Score: 158 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091007-08823.html – L5520: PowerEdge R510. Score: 155 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091012-08892.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 115 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08775.html Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of March 24, 2010
44 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Integer Throughput Performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006 benchmark Comparison based on published/submitted results to www.spec.org as of February 2010. • Intel® Xeon® processor 3.80 with 2M L2 cache based platform details • HP* ProLiant* DL380 G4 server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon processor 3.80GHz with 2M L2 cache, 800 FSB, 8GB memory, Microsoft Windows Server 2003* Ent. SP1, Intel® C++ Compiler 9.1 for 32-bit apps, Build 20060323Z Package ID: W_CC_P_9.1.020. Referenced as published at 20.9. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q3/cpu2006-20060513-00027.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • IBM System X* 3550 platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00GHz, 4Mb L2 cache, 16GB memory (8 x 2GB DDR2-5300F ECC), SUSE* Linux* Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64) 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux* version 10.0. Published in August 2007. Referenced as published at 60.8. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q3/cpu2006-20070803-01638.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two Intel Xeon X5365, 3.00 GHz, 1333MHz system, 8 MB (4 MB shared / 2 cores L3 Cache), 16GB memory (8x2 GB 667 MHz ECC CL5 FB-DIMM), SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 10 Compiler: Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64. Published August 2007. Referenced as published at 99.1. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20070916-02063.html • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY* RX200 S4 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 12MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 16GB memory (8x2GB DDR2 PC2- 5300F, 2 rank, CAS 5-5-5, with ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-smp*, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32* and Linux64* version 11.0 build 20080730. Referenced as published at 140. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080901-05156.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details • ASUS Z8PE-D12X based server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 24 GB memory (6x4GB PC3-10600R, CL9-9-9, ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.34-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64 version 11.0 build 20090131. Referenced as published at 241. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q1/cpu2006-20090316-06703.html • • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (WSM-EP) platform (Score: 352) • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series SPECint*_rate_base2006 Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010.
45 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series VMmark* Performance (generational) • Virtualization Performance on VMware* ESX using VMmark* benchmark • Comparison based on published/submitted/approved results as of April 27, 2009. Results are posted at http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge* 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00Ghz, 4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory (8x4GB 667MHz ECC CL5 DDR2 FB-DIMM), VMware ESX Server* V3.0.1. Published at 3.89@3 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark_dell3.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5365 3.00GHz, 2x4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory, VMware ESX Server V3.0.1.Published at 7.03@5 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/vmmark_dell2.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • HP Proliant* ML370 G5 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 2x6MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 48GB memory, VMware ESX V3.5. Update 3 Published at 9.15@7 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-HP-2008- 10-09-ML370.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details: • Dell PowerEdge* R710 Server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 96 GB memory (12x8 GB DDR3-1066MHz), VMware ESX v4.0. VMmark V1.1. Result measured at 24.0@17 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Dell-2009-04-21-R710.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 based platform details: • Intel reference platform using two Intel Xeon processors X5680 (12 M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 96 GB memory (12x 8 GB DDR3-800 Reg ECC DIMMs), VMware ESX* V4.0 Update 1. Performance measured at 32.25@ 26 tiles. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010
46 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. DDR3L Power Testing: System Configuration Item Details Server Intel 1U S5500WBV server Processor 2x Xeon® X5650 (Westmere 2.66GHz, 6 cores, 95W TDP, pre-production parts) Power Supply 1x 450W PSU Hard Disk: 1x Seagate Barracuda 120GB, ST3120026AS Memory: 4x4GB DDR3-1333 2 DIMMs installed per CPU Before (1.5v): Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 After (1.35v): Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load line Power measurement at the wall using same system configuration; memory was the only variable changed Before: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 (1.5V) After: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 (1.35V) Note: System level power reductions of 0.52W at idle and 1.42W under 100% load were approx the same per DIMM with 6 DIMMs installed
47 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Tick-Tock Development Model Sustained Microprocessor Leadership Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Intel® Core™ Microarchitecture Nehalem Microarchitecture Sandy Bridge Microarchitecture 65nm 45nm 32nm 22nm Intel® Xeon® 5600 Intel’s first 32nm SERVER processor with 6 cores and 12 threads
48 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Tick-Tock Development Model Sustained Microprocessor Leadership Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Intel® Core™ Microarchitecture Nehalem Microarchitecture Sandy Bridge Microarchitecture 65nm 45nm 32nm 22nm Intel® Xeon® 7500 Intel’s first 45nm SERVER processor with 8 cores and 16 threads
49 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® AES-NI Ecosystem Usage Model Application/OS Description Status Secure Transactions Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 IIS for SSL/TLS Available now OpenSSL patch Intel(R) AES-NI enabled SSL patches Available now RHEL6 beta OS with openSSL Available now Fedora 12 OS with openSSL Available now Full Disk Encryption (FDE) McAfee FDE software Available now Microsoft bitlocker Bitlocker for FDE Available now Checkpoint Endpoint security R73, FDE 7.4 HFA1 Available now Enterprise Software Oracle Berkeley database Available Now VMware vSphere 4.1 Provides pass through support for Intel® AES-NI Available now Tools/Libraries Compilers Intel V11.0, GCC v4.4.0, MS VS 2008 SP1 Compilers Available now Libraries Microsoft* OS CNG library WS2008R2, IPP crypto library v7.0 beta, NSS 3.12.3 Crypto Libraries Available now 49 SSL “Data in Motion” and Full Disk Encryption Ready Now, Enterprise Apps later in 2010
50 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 3500 16000 20 Intel® Xeon® 5600 Series Encryption Performance Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations. 1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Server. PHP banking sessions /users measured with Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor (WSM, 3.33 GHz) vs Inel® Xeon® 5160 processor (Woodcrest, 3 GHz) and Intel® Xeon® X5570 processor (NHM, 2.93 GHz), 24 SSD RAID 0 arrays, TLS_RSA_with_AES_128_CBC_SHA cipher suite. 2 Oracle 11g with TDE, time takes to decrypt a 5.1 million row encrypted table with AES-256 CBC mode on Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor (WSM, 3.33 GHz) optimized with Intel® Performance Primitives crypto library (IPP) vs Intel® Xeon® X5560 processor (NHM, 2.8 GHz) without IPP. Timing measured is per 4K of data. 3 McAfee Endpoint Encryption for PCs (EEPC) 6.0 package with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 4.5 encrypting a 32GB X25E SSD with Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor (WSM, 3.33 GHz) vs. Intel® Xeon® X5570 (NHM, 2.93 GHz). 24GB of memory. 158 Web Banking Workload (MS IIS/PHP)1 Database Encryption/Decryption (Oracle 11g)2 users DecryptionTime(us) 4.5x Intel Xeon 5100 w/o encryption Intel Xeon 5600 with encryption Intel Xeon 5500 w/o Intel IPP Intel Xeon 5600 -89% Intel Xeon 5500 Intel Xeon 5600 12 -42% provisioningtime (seconds) 23% 13000 Intel Xeon 5500 w/o encryption Full Disk Encryption (McAfee Endpoint Encryption) 3 17 Higher is better Lower is better Lower is better Intel AES-NI Helps Make Encryption More Feasible for More Workloads

More Related Content

PDF
4.exalogic ferhat final
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
5. od optimized data-protection_archival_v1
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Oow Ppt 1
byFran Navarro
 
PDF
MT42 The impact of high performance Oracle workloads on the evolution of the ...
byDell EMC World
 
PDF
Oow Ppt 2
byFran Navarro
 
PPTX
Oracle Database Appliance
byvkv_vkv
 
PPTX
Exalogic workshop overview__hardwarev4
byFran Navarro
 
PDF
Dell Storage Management
byDell World
 
4.exalogic ferhat final
byDoina Draganescu
 
5. od optimized data-protection_archival_v1
byDoina Draganescu
 
Oow Ppt 1
byFran Navarro
 
MT42 The impact of high performance Oracle workloads on the evolution of the ...
byDell EMC World
 
Oow Ppt 2
byFran Navarro
 
Oracle Database Appliance
byvkv_vkv
 
Exalogic workshop overview__hardwarev4
byFran Navarro
 
Dell Storage Management
byDell World
 

What's hot

PDF
Výhody a benefity nasazení Oracle Database Appliance
byMarketingArrowECS_CZ
 
PPT
Oracle it runs zfs storage appliance
bysolarisyougood
 
PDF
Dell Networking Wired, Wireless and Security Solutions Lab
byDell World
 
PDF
Introducing Postgres Enterprise Manager 5.0
byEDB
 
PDF
Oracle Data Protection - 2. část
byMarketingArrowECS_CZ
 
PDF
Dell PowerEdge Zero Touch Provisioning
byDell World
 
PPTX
Emc sql server 2012 overview
bysolarisyougood
 
PDF
Postgres Enterprise Manager 4.0 Overview
byEDB
 
PPTX
ODA solution in-a-box
byOracle
 
PPTX
Backup &amp; recovery for exadata
bysolarisyougood
 
PDF
Exalogic Bcn
byFran Navarro
 
PDF
Demartek lenovo s3200_sql_server_evaluation_2016-01
byLenovo Data Center
 
PDF
Exadata meeting business challenges! - Doug Cackett
byORACLE USER GROUP ESTONIA
 
PPTX
Tendencias Storage
byFran Navarro
 
PDF
The Value of Postgres to IT and Finance
byEDB
 
PPTX
Oracle Sistemas Convergentes
byFran Navarro
 
PDF
Introducing Lenovo XClarity: Simplified Hardware Resource Management
byLenovo Data Center
 
PPT
Collaborate07kmohiuddin
bySal Marcuz
 
PDF
Denver Broncos Case Study
byNetApp
 
PPTX
Data center Trends with Oracle
byFran Navarro
 
Výhody a benefity nasazení Oracle Database Appliance
byMarketingArrowECS_CZ
 
Oracle it runs zfs storage appliance
bysolarisyougood
 
Dell Networking Wired, Wireless and Security Solutions Lab
byDell World
 
Introducing Postgres Enterprise Manager 5.0
byEDB
 
Oracle Data Protection - 2. část
byMarketingArrowECS_CZ
 
Dell PowerEdge Zero Touch Provisioning
byDell World
 
Emc sql server 2012 overview
bysolarisyougood
 
Postgres Enterprise Manager 4.0 Overview
byEDB
 
ODA solution in-a-box
byOracle
 
Backup &amp; recovery for exadata
bysolarisyougood
 
Exalogic Bcn
byFran Navarro
 
Demartek lenovo s3200_sql_server_evaluation_2016-01
byLenovo Data Center
 
Exadata meeting business challenges! - Doug Cackett
byORACLE USER GROUP ESTONIA
 
Tendencias Storage
byFran Navarro
 
The Value of Postgres to IT and Finance
byEDB
 
Oracle Sistemas Convergentes
byFran Navarro
 
Introducing Lenovo XClarity: Simplified Hardware Resource Management
byLenovo Data Center
 
Collaborate07kmohiuddin
bySal Marcuz
 
Denver Broncos Case Study
byNetApp
 
Data center Trends with Oracle
byFran Navarro
 

Similar to 9. intel prez sesiune hw

PDF
Процессор Intel Xeon
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Технологии Intel в центрах обработки данных
byFujitsu Russia
 
PPTX
Hardware and Software Co-optimization to Make Sure Oracle Fusion Middleware R...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Fin...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Data ...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Cерверы Depo storm 3400 на базе новейших процессоров intel xeon e5 2600v3 fin
byDEPO Computers
 
PDF
Xeon E5 Making the Business Case PowerPoint
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Core ...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel keynote
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 Guide, Silicon Mechanics
bywaltermoss123
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Telec...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Tec...
byIntel IT Center
 
PPTX
Yashi dealer meeting settembre 2016 tecnologie xeon intel italia
byYashi Italia
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase – Big D...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v4 Product Family EAMG
byIntel IT Center
 
PPTX
E5 Intel Xeon Processor E5 Family Making the Business Case
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Inside story on Intel Data Center @ IDF 2013
byIntel IT Center
 
PPTX
Xeon Azure Local Pitch Deck - 25Q1v3.pptx
byUrielrodzmig
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v4 Big Data Analytics Applications Showcase
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v4 Telco Cloud Digital Applications Showcase
byIntel IT Center
 
Процессор Intel Xeon
byNick Turunov
 
Технологии Intel в центрах обработки данных
byFujitsu Russia
 
Hardware and Software Co-optimization to Make Sure Oracle Fusion Middleware R...
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Fin...
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Data ...
byIntel IT Center
 
Cерверы Depo storm 3400 на базе новейших процессоров intel xeon e5 2600v3 fin
byDEPO Computers
 
Xeon E5 Making the Business Case PowerPoint
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Core ...
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel keynote
byDoina Draganescu
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 Guide, Silicon Mechanics
bywaltermoss123
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Telec...
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Tec...
byIntel IT Center
 
Yashi dealer meeting settembre 2016 tecnologie xeon intel italia
byYashi Italia
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase – Big D...
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v4 Product Family EAMG
byIntel IT Center
 
E5 Intel Xeon Processor E5 Family Making the Business Case
byIntel IT Center
 
Inside story on Intel Data Center @ IDF 2013
byIntel IT Center
 
Xeon Azure Local Pitch Deck - 25Q1v3.pptx
byUrielrodzmig
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v4 Big Data Analytics Applications Showcase
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v4 Telco Cloud Digital Applications Showcase
byIntel IT Center
 

More from Doina Draganescu

PDF
Tech strategies keynote combined mpeck ro_v2
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Prez szabolcs
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Maximize business agility and it efficiency with enterpr mpeck ro_v3
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Extending and improving bps romania 30th of nov 2010
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
E2.0 fmw for apps ro 2010 11-30 v.02
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Better insight 2010 nov 30 bucharest
byDoina Draganescu
 
PPT
Poze
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Full page fax print5
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Full page fax print7
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Full page fax print6
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Full page fax print4
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Full page fax print3
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Full page fax print 2
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Full page fax print1
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Full page fax print
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Intel on hw
byDoina Draganescu
 
DOC
E blast intel
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Intel
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
3. oracle day crm_azt_v3_0
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Oracle day romania peter erdosi final
byDoina Draganescu
 
Tech strategies keynote combined mpeck ro_v2
byDoina Draganescu
 
Prez szabolcs
byDoina Draganescu
 
Maximize business agility and it efficiency with enterpr mpeck ro_v3
byDoina Draganescu
 
Extending and improving bps romania 30th of nov 2010
byDoina Draganescu
 
E2.0 fmw for apps ro 2010 11-30 v.02
byDoina Draganescu
 
Better insight 2010 nov 30 bucharest
byDoina Draganescu
 
Poze
byDoina Draganescu
 
Full page fax print5
byDoina Draganescu
 
Full page fax print7
byDoina Draganescu
 
Full page fax print6
byDoina Draganescu
 
Full page fax print4
byDoina Draganescu
 
Full page fax print3
byDoina Draganescu
 
Full page fax print 2
byDoina Draganescu
 
Full page fax print1
byDoina Draganescu
 
Full page fax print
byDoina Draganescu
 
Intel on hw
byDoina Draganescu
 
E blast intel
byDoina Draganescu
 
Intel
byDoina Draganescu
 
3. oracle day crm_azt_v3_0
byDoina Draganescu
 
Oracle day romania peter erdosi final
byDoina Draganescu
 

Recently uploaded

PDF
How to Design Premium Health (Public Health) PPT Using AI? Top Strategies
byPublic Health Concern Nepal
 
PDF
Afsar Ahmed - Digital Marketing Portfolio
byAfsar Ahmed
 
PPTX
The Lex Wire Precedent: A Technical Standard for Machine-Mediated Authority ...
byJeff Howell
 
PDF
Fortinet Certified Fundamentals in Cybersecurity
byVICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 
PDF
Certified AI-Empowered SAFe Release Train Engineer.pdf
byMarc Entsminger SPC6, RTE, SSM, SA, SDP
 
PDF
Dev Dives: Build and deploy agentic automations - the unified way
byUiPathCommunity
 
PDF
When Drones Decide for Themselves_ Inside the Rise of Machine-Led Flight.pdf
byLyra Anderson
 
PPTX
TechSprint WinterHack — Top 10 Teams Pitching Session we are excited for pit...
bybajpaitusharoffon678
 
PDF
Certified AI-Native Foundations Professional.pdf
byMarc Entsminger SPC6, RTE, SSM, SA, SDP
 
PDF
Parental Control App for Phones_ The Complete 2026 Guide for Safer, Smarter P...
byRyan Cooper
 
PDF
The Enterprise Web3 Landscape - a view from Kaleido based on the past 10 year...
byPeter Broadhurst
 
PDF
JCB_3CX_SPECS (24 págs) companywrench.com .pdf
byAquilesOyarzn1
 
PPTX
Spacecraft Guidance Quick Research Guide by Arthur Morgan
byArthur Morgan
 
PDF
Transcript: EU regulations for the North American book supply chain - Tech Fo...
byBookNet Canada
 
PPTX
Jisc Equipment Data Service Update Workshop 3 December 2025
byJisc
 
PDF
Agentic-Document-Extraction-2026-Presentation.pdf
byTamanna
 
PDF
Real-Time AI at Scale Masterclass - Challenges of AI at Scale
byScyllaDB
 
PDF
Computer-Based Training (CBT) The Backbone of Modern Technical & Defence Trai...
bycomputerbasedtrainin1
 
PDF
Bettersize | BeSEC Series Product Brochure
byBettersize Instruments
 
PDF
What Thema can do: Leveraging metadata to support the discoverability of Firs...
byBookNet Canada
 
How to Design Premium Health (Public Health) PPT Using AI? Top Strategies
byPublic Health Concern Nepal
 
Afsar Ahmed - Digital Marketing Portfolio
byAfsar Ahmed
 
The Lex Wire Precedent: A Technical Standard for Machine-Mediated Authority ...
byJeff Howell
 
Fortinet Certified Fundamentals in Cybersecurity
byVICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 
Certified AI-Empowered SAFe Release Train Engineer.pdf
byMarc Entsminger SPC6, RTE, SSM, SA, SDP
 
Dev Dives: Build and deploy agentic automations - the unified way
byUiPathCommunity
 
When Drones Decide for Themselves_ Inside the Rise of Machine-Led Flight.pdf
byLyra Anderson
 
TechSprint WinterHack — Top 10 Teams Pitching Session we are excited for pit...
bybajpaitusharoffon678
 
Certified AI-Native Foundations Professional.pdf
byMarc Entsminger SPC6, RTE, SSM, SA, SDP
 
Parental Control App for Phones_ The Complete 2026 Guide for Safer, Smarter P...
byRyan Cooper
 
The Enterprise Web3 Landscape - a view from Kaleido based on the past 10 year...
byPeter Broadhurst
 
JCB_3CX_SPECS (24 págs) companywrench.com .pdf
byAquilesOyarzn1
 
Spacecraft Guidance Quick Research Guide by Arthur Morgan
byArthur Morgan
 
Transcript: EU regulations for the North American book supply chain - Tech Fo...
byBookNet Canada
 
Jisc Equipment Data Service Update Workshop 3 December 2025
byJisc
 
Agentic-Document-Extraction-2026-Presentation.pdf
byTamanna
 
Real-Time AI at Scale Masterclass - Challenges of AI at Scale
byScyllaDB
 
Computer-Based Training (CBT) The Backbone of Modern Technical & Defence Trai...
bycomputerbasedtrainin1
 
Bettersize | BeSEC Series Product Brochure
byBettersize Instruments
 
What Thema can do: Leveraging metadata to support the discoverability of Firs...
byBookNet Canada
 

9. intel prez sesiune hw

  • 1.
    11 * Othernames and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor’s Driving Server Refresh Florin Raclariu Market Development Manager
  • 2.
    2 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. This slide MUST be used with any slides removed from this presentation Legal Disclaimer • Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations • Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. • Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details. • Intel, processors, chipsets, and desktop boards may contain design defects or errors known as errata, which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request. • Hyper-Threading Technology requires a computer system with a processor supporting HT Technology and an HT Technology-enabled chipset, BIOS and operating system. Performance will vary depending on the specific hardware and software you use. For more information including details on which processors support HT Technology, see here • Intel® Turbo Boost Technology requires a PC with a processor with Intel Turbo Boost Technology capability. Intel Turbo Boost Technology performance varies depending on hardware, software and overall system configuration. Check with your PC manufacturer on whether your system delivers Intel Turbo Boost Technology. For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost • Intel Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, virtual machine monitor (VMM) and applications enabled for virtualization technology. Functionality, performance or other virtualization technology benefits will vary depending on hardware and software configurations. Virtualization technology-enabled BIOS and VMM applications are currently in development. • 64-bit computing on Intel architecture requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, operating system, device drivers and applications enabled for Intel® 64 architecture. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations. Consult with your system vendor for more information. • Lead-free: 45nm product is manufactured on a lead-free process. Lead is below 1000 PPM per EU RoHS directive (2002/95/EC, Annex A). Some EU RoHS exemptions for lead may apply to other components used in the product package. • Halogen-free: Applies only to halogenated flame retardants and PVC in components. Halogens are below 900 PPM bromine and 900 PPM chlorine. • Intel, Intel Xeon, Intel Core microarchitecture, and the Intel logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. • © 2009 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) logo is reprinted with permission
  • 3.
    3 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® 5600 Energy Efficiency Building on Xeon® 5500 Leadership Capabilities 1 DDR3L supported for Xeon® 5600 only. System level power testing sing Samsung 1.35V DIMMs as compared to Samsung 1.5V DIMMs reduced power by 0.52W per DIMM at active idle, and 1.42W per DIMM under 100% load. Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load line. Power measurement at the wall using same system configuration; memory was the only variable changed. See backup for system configuration. Intel® Xeon® 5600 delivers greater platform Energy Efficiency Intel® Xeon® 5600 Intel® Xeon® 5600 Integrated Power Gates and Automated Low Power States with Six Cores Intelligent Power Technology 130W 95W 80W 60W (6C) 40W (4C) Up to 1.5W per DIMM reduction in memory power1 Lower Power DDR3 Memory Reduced power consumption through more efficient Turbo Boost and memory power management CPU Power Management Better performance/Watt Lower power consumption Lower Power CPUs Lower power CPU TDP options for Xeon® 5600
  • 4.
    4 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced • 6.4 GT/s QPI • 8MB / 12MB • DDR3 1333 • Turbo Boost • HT Standard • 5.86 GT/s QPI • 8MB / 12MB • DDR3 1066 • Turbo Boost • HT Basic • 4.8 GT/s QPI • 4M cache • DDR3 800 80W L5640 6C 2.26 GHz1 Xeon® 5500  Xeon® 5600 Transition Xeon® 5500Usage Xeon® 5600 X5570 2.93 GHz X5560 2.80 GHz X5550 2.66 GHz E5540 2.53 GHz E5530 2.40 GHz E5520 2.26 GHz E5506 2.13 GHz E5504 2.00 GHz 95W 95W 95W 80W 80W 80W 80W 80W E5502 1.86 (2C) 80W X5670 6C 2.93 GHz X5660 6C 2.80 GHz X5650 6C 2.66 GHz E5640 4C 2.66 GHz E5630 4C 2.53 GHz E5620 4C 2.40 GHz 95W 95W 95W 80W 80W X5680 6C 3.33 GHz 130W E5507 2.26 GHz (4C) E5506 2.13GHz (4C) 80W 80W E5503 2.00 GHz (2C) 80W 60W 80W L5630 4C 2.13 GHz2 40W L5609 4C 1.86 GHz3 40W Xeon ® 5600 (Westmere-EP) SKUs Xeon ® 5500 SKUs LowPowerOptions X5677 4C 3.46 GHz 130W Freq-Optimized X5667 4C 3.06 GHz 95W Maximum Performance 6 Cores 4 Cores (freq optimized) Cost-Optimized Higher Frequency Xeon® E5500 SKUs Best Price Performance Higher Freq More Cache 1 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1333MHz 2 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz 3 SKU supports 4.80 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz, with Turbo and HT off. Oracle Validated CPU Option
  • 5.
    5 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (AES-NI) Enables broad usage of encryption throughout the enterprise Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) Prevents the insertion of malicious software prior to VMM launch New Security Features with Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Ready for Today Prepared for Tomorrow
  • 6.
    6 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. ― To help organizations protect data privacy at a lower cost, Oracle today announced a breakthrough in the speed of the Transparent Data Encryption feature of Oracle Advanced Security for Oracle® Database 11g Release 2 running on Intel® Xeon® 5600 series processor based servers with Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel AES-NI). According to benchmark results, Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Transparent Data Encryption shows 10x speedup in AES encryption processing rate and 8x speedup of decryption processing rate using 256 bit keys on Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor utilizing AES-NI as compared to Intel® Xeon® X5560 processor without AES-NI. ORACLE OPENWORLD, SAN FRANCISCO September 21, 2010
  • 7.
    7 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Refresh and Future-Proof with Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series Xeon® 5300 Xeon® 5400 Xeon® 5500 2007 2008 2009 2010 Xeon® 5600 Intel® VT FlexMigrationRETIRE Refresh Your Pools to Support New Services and Business Growth Greater VM capacity / performance, lower power Intel® VT FlexMigration compatibility Advanced capabilities (Intel® VT, Intel® AES-NI, Intel® TXT) REFRESH Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.
  • 8.
    8 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Technical Compute Servers Mainstream Enterprise Servers Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series Performance Summary Up to 63% performance boost over Xeon® 5500 Downbin int_rate fp_rate 1.00 1.20 1.21 1.25 1.44 1.61 1.63 Baseline Stream Computer Aided Eng. SPECfp rate 2006 Life Sciences LINPACK Black Scholes* 1.00 1.27 1.40 1.42 1.42 1.46 Baseline SAP-SD SPEC int_rate 2006 VMmark* SPEC_power Specjbb 2005 Up to 46% Performance JavaEnergy Efficiency ERP Integer Virtualization HPC CAD Financial Floating Point Memory Bandwidth Xeon 5600-EP (6C, 3.33 GHz) vs. Intel Xeon X5570 (4C, 2.93 GHz) Bandwidth Sensitive Frequency Sensitive Xeon 5600-EP (6C, 3.33 GHz) vs. Intel Xeon X5570 (4C, 2.93 GHz) Up to 63% Performance Life Sciences Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Source: Intel Internal measurements Jan 2010. See backup for additional details Virtualization
  • 9.
    9 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Greater Datacenter Energy Efficiency 1 Source: Internal Intel estimates comparing Xeon® X5670 vs. X5570 SKUs using SPECpower. See backup for system configurations. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Maximize Performance or Energy Efficiency RelativePerformance andSystemPower Xeon® 5570 vs. Xeon® L5640 Power and Performance Comparison X5570 (4C) 2.93GHz 95W L5640 (6C) 6C, 2.26GHz 60W Peak power under load (W) Performance Same Performance Up to 30% Lower Power1
  • 10.
    10 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. ~76% of the server install base is still up for refresh Estimated 34% single-core and 42% dual-core1 Server Refresh Opportunities in 2010 IDC believes replacement cycles being delayed from 3-4 years to every 4-5 years. Source IDC, 2009 Source: Gartner press release http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1209913 Approximately 1 million servers have had their replacement delayed by a year. Maintaining Aging Servers Limits Innovation & Growth Now is the Time to Refresh! If you delayed refresh in 2009, then you’re not alone 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 single core dual core four core + Source: Intel. Intel® Xeon® shipments, 2005-2009. 2010 will mark an important return to installed base refreshes driven by an uptick in enterprise budgets, new technological innovations, and a return to economic growth. Source: IDC, February 2010 Approximately 1 million servers have had their replacement delayed by a year. Source: Gartner press release http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1209913 1 Source: IDC 2009 Q4 Server Tracker. Install base calculated by using this IDC data and a standard life-cycle distribution, and assumes 4- to 5-year replacement cycle in 2008 and 2009 when the recession hit.
  • 11.
    11 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 2010 Efficiency Refresh 15:1 As Low as 5 Month Payback 95% Annual Energy Cost Reduction (estimated) 1 rack of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based Servers Performance Refresh 1:1 Up to 15x Performance 15 racks of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based Servers 8% Annual Energy Costs Estimated Reduction (estimated) 2005 15 racks of Intel® Xeon® Single Core Servers Server Refresh: 2010 Single Core  Xeon® 5600 – OR – Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. Dual core refresh Refresh benefits for smaller deployments
  • 12.
    12 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Refresh 1:1 Up to 5x Performance 5 racks of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based Servers 10% Annual Energy Costs Estimated Reduction (estimated) 2006 2010 Efficiency Refresh 5:1 As Low as 15 Month Payback 85% Annual Energy Cost Reduction (estimated) 1 rack of Intel® Xeon® 5600 Based Servers 5 racks of Intel® Xeon® Dual Core Servers – OR – Server Refresh: 2010 Dual Core  Xeon® 5600 Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. Back
  • 13.
    13 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. The Cost of Waiting in 2010 Refresh: If Not NOW, When? Monthly costs for NOT refreshing 500 Single-core Servers with 30 Intel® Xeon® 5600 Servers up to $100,000per month1 $50,920per month Software support: Utility costs: $18,380per month $31,250per month Warranty costs: 1 Monthly Savings in utility and SW support costs determined by comparing the incremental costs associated with not refreshing 50 older single-core servers purchased back in 2005 vs. refreshing on an approximate 15:1 ratio with a Xeon 5680-based servers in Year 1. Warranty cost assumes $750/year per server if purchased after the initial OEM 3-year warranty period has expired. Actual total cost is $100,750. Source: Consolidation ratio calculated using the Xeon Server Refresh Savings Estimator (www.intel.com/go/xeonestimator) and uses publicly available RHEL OS support costs, default utility settings, and SPECint*_rate_base2006 performance and power data for the Xeon® X5680 as found in the backup. See the backup for system configurations.
  • 14.
    14 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Sun Fire X4470 Nehalem EX 4-socket 512 GB Sun Fire X4800 Nehalem EX 8-socket 1 TB Sun Fire X2270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 96GB Sun Netra X4270 Nehalem EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Blade X6275 Nehalem EP 4-socket 192 GB Sun Blade X6270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4170 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Oracle Exadata Database Machine X2-8 Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud Westmere EP Nehalem EX 8-socket 1 TB
  • 15.
    15 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Business Processing (DB, ERP, CRM, batch) Decision Support (data warehouse, Business Intelligence) Large-scale Virtualization Traditional Big Server Usages Source: Internal Intel assessment & 2009 IDC Server Workloads Forecast and Analysis Study Application Development High Performance Computing Collaboration Web Infrastructure IT Infrastructure Volume 2-socket Servers Bigger Servers The Most Demanding Applications Require Big Server Capabilities
  • 16.
    16 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Technology Advantages Nehalem architecture 72 PCIe Gen2 lanes Xeon® 7500 Nehalem Generation Intel® Microarchitecture ICH 10/10R Intel® 82599 10GbE Controller 8-cores 24MB Shared L3 Cache 64 DIMM slots support up to 1 terabyte of memory (4 sockets) Scaling from 2-256 sockets Intel Virtualization Technologies Mission Critical Class Reliability features Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer Memory Intel® 7500 Chipset PCI Express* 2.0 Xeon® 7500 Xeon® 7500 Xeon® 7500 Xeon® 7500
  • 17.
    17 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500/6500 Series Product Options + 1066 Mhz frequency runs at an effective frequency of 978 Mhz when run at 5.86GHz SMI link speed ¥Max Scale Glueless: Scaling capability refers to maximum supported number of CPUs in a ―glueless‖ Boxboro-EX platform (e.g. 8 skt means this SKU can be used to populate up to 8 sockets in a single system) **Max Turbo Boost frequency based on number of 133 MHz increments above base freq (+2 = 0.266 GHz, +3 = 0.400 GHz) ***E6510 may not be scaled above 2 sockets even with a customer node controller 8 and 4 socket/ Scalable Advanced features available on higher end processors Usage Processor Number/Freq ¥Max Scale Glueless Cores/ Threads Cache QPI Speed Max Mem Speed TDP ** Turbo HT Advanced X7560 (2.26GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  X7550 (2 GHz) 8 skt 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Standard X7542 (2.66GHz) 8 skt 6/6 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 130W +1 No E7540 (2 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 105W +2  E7530 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 12M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E7520 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 4/8 18M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 95W No Turbo  Low Voltage L7555 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  L7545 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  Usage Processor Number/Freq ¥Max Scale Glueless Cores/ Threads Cache QPI Speed Max Mem Speed TDP ** Turbo HT Advanced X6550 (2 GHz) 2 skt 8/16 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Standard E6540 (2 GHz) 2 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E6510 (1.73 GHz) 2 skt only 2 skt*** 4/8 12M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 105W No Turbo  2 socket/ Scalable
  • 18.
    18 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Hyper-threading Technology Increases performance for threaded applications delivering greater throughput and responsiveness Higher Performance For Threaded Workloads Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Increases performance by increasing processor frequency and enabling faster speeds when conditions allow Performance Enhancements Intel® Xeon® 7500 Series Processor Core0 Core1 Core8 Core0 Core1 Core8 Core0 Core1 Frequency All cores operate at rated frequency All cores operate at higher frequency Fewer cores may operate at even higher frequencies 8C Turbo Normal <8C Turbo … … … Higher Performance on Demand
  • 19.
    19 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 3x average improvement Average of 3x performance improvement over 7400 series across a range of benchmarks 1.0 2.51 2.64 2.77 3.19 3.43 3.70 3.87 8.24 Xeon® X7460 Baseline SPECjAppServer*2004 SPECint*_rate_base2006 TPC Benchmark* E SPECjbb*2005 SAP* SD 2-tier VMmark* SPECfp*_rate_base2006 Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 series-based Servers 4S Standard Benchmarks Performance Summary Intel®Xeon®ProcessorX7560 Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Source: Best published / submitted results comparison of best 4-socket Xeon X7460 and X7560 models as of 7 May 2010. See previous “Broad Performance Claim” foil and notes for more information. HPC Consolidation Xeon X7460 = Intel Xeon processor X7460 (16M Cache, 2.66GHz, 1066MHz FSB, formerly codenamed Dunnington) Xeon X7560 = Intel Xeon processor X7560 (24M Cache, 2.26GHz, 6.40GT/s Intel® QPI, formerly codenamed Nehalem-EX) Relative results Higher is better
  • 20.
    20 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 4S Enterprise Standard Benchmarks Comparison to 2S Xeon® 5600 Series Source: Best published results on SPEC.org or VMware.com as of 29 March 2010. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Up to 2.2x the performance of Xeon® 5600 1.95 2.01 2.04 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.17 2.19 1.00Xeon® X5680 Baseline SPECompM*2001 VMmark* SPECint*_rate_base2006 SPECmpi*2007 SAP* SD 2-tier SPECjAppServer*2004 SPECjbb*2005 SPECfp*_rate_base2006 Relative results Higher is better 4S/64TIntel®Xeon®ProcessorX7560(24M Cache,2.26GHz,6.40GT/sIntel®QPI) Xeon® 7500 and Xeon® 5600 benchmark results represent best top-bin published results as of 29 March 2010. See notes for details. (6C, 12M Cache, 3.33GHz)
  • 21.
    21 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced RAS Starts With Silicon Requires An Ecosystem Mission Critical Solutions Span Silicon, Firmware & OS Mission Critical OS Oracle Innovation Intel Silicon
  • 22.
    22 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Memory • Inter-socket Memory Mirroring • Intel® Scalable Memory Interconnect (Intel® SMI) Lane Failover • Intel® SMI Clock Fail Over • Intel® SMI Packet Retry • Memory Address Parity • Failed DIMM Isolation • Memory Board Hot Add/Remove • Dynamic Memory Migration* • OS Memory On-lining * • Recovery from Single DRAM Device Failure (SDDC) plus random bit error • Memory Thermal Throttling • Demand and Patrol scrubbing • Fail Over from Single DRAM Device Failure (SDDC) • Memory DIMM and Rank Sparing • Intra-socket Memory Mirroring • Mirrored Memory Board Hot Add/Remove Advanced Reliability Starts With Silicon Xeon® 7500 Reliability Features Bold text denoted new feature for Xeon® 7500 * Feature requires OS support, check with your OS vendor for support plans Some features require OEM server implementation and validation and may not be provided in all server platforms Over 20 New RAS features across the entire platform I/O Hub • Physical IOH Hot Add • OS IOH On-lining* • PCI-E Hot Plug CPU/Socket • Machine Check Architecture (MCA) recovery • Corrected Machine Check Interrupt (CMCI) • Corrupt Data Containment Mode • Viral Mode • OS Assisted Processor Socket Migration* • OS CPU on-lining * • CPU Board Hot Add at QPI • Electronically Isolated (Static) Partitioning • Single Core Disable for Fault Resilient Boot Intel® QuickPath Interconnect • Intel QPI Packet Retry • Intel QPI Protocol Protection via CRC (8bit or 16bit rolling) • QPI Clock Fail Over • QPI Self-Healing
  • 23.
    23 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. HW Un-correctable Errors Machine Check Architecture Recovery First Machine Check Recovery in Xeon®-based Systems Previously seen only in RISC, mainframe, and Itanium-based systems *Errors detected using Patrol Scrub or Explicit Write-back from cache Allows Recovery From Otherwise Fatal System Errors Normal Status With Error Prevention System Recovery with OS Error Corrected Error Detected* Error Contained HW Correctable ErrorsUn-correctable Errors System works in conjunction with OS or VMM to recover or restart processes and continue normal operation Bad memory location flagged so data will not be used by OS or applications Error information passed to OS / VMM MCA Recovery
  • 24.
    24 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Efficiency Refresh 20:1 Up to 92% Annual Energy Costs Reduction (Estimated) 1 Rack of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based Servers As Little as 12 months Payback (Estimated) Server Refresh Benefits Single Core  Xeon® 7500 Source: Intel measurements as of March 2010 of Xeon 7500 and single-core 4-socket systems. Performance comparison using SPECint_rate_base2006. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. – OR – 2010 Performance Refresh 1:1 Up to 20x Performance (Estimated) 20 Racks of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based Servers 2005 20 Racks of Intel® Xeon® Single Core Servers
  • 25.
    25 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Refresh 1:1 Up to 36x Performance (Estimated) 36 Racks of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based 8- socket Servers 2010 Efficiency Refresh 36:1 Up to 91% Annual Energy Costs Reduction (Estimated) 1 Rack of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based Servers As Little as 14 months Payback (Estimated) Server Refresh & Consolidate Single Core 4-socket  Xeon® 7500 8-socket Source: Intel measurements as of March 2010 of Xeon 7500 and single-core 4-socket systems. Performance comparison using SPECint_rate_base2006. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. – OR – 2005 36 Racks of Intel® Xeon® Single Core, 4-socket Servers
  • 26.
    26 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Oracle Database with Intel Xeon® 7500 When simplification & cost reduction for your DB environment is your goal Source: Intel estimates as of February 2010. Performance comparison using internal workload. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software 2010: 2 servers2005: 30 servers Single Core 15:1 New Xeon® 7500 series ~$70k HW Investment As low as 4 Month Estimated Payback Business BENEFITS Over 4 years Lower Operating Costs $200K Power / Cooling SAVINGS Lower Software Costs $1.28M SW Licensing SAVINGS Floor Space 94% REDUCTION Annual Energy Costs 90% REDUCTION IT BENEFITS
  • 27.
    27 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Enhancing Platform Value Beyond the Processor 1 Based on Intel internal results. Actual results may vary significantly based on workload and product configurations. See backup for more details on the results. Impact1 • Up to 46X lower power • Lower TCO (fewer drives) • Up to 6X read perf improvement Impact1 • Up to 10X increase IO bandwidth • >5X port count reduction • Up to 4.5X power per Gb reduction Network Optimizations • Unified networking • Eliminate switches/cables • Scalable with multi-core CPUs Solid State Drives • Lower power consumption • No moving parts • Dramatic performance increases Intel® 10GbE Intel® X25-M SSDs
  • 28.
    28 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Sun Fire X4470 Nehalem EX 4-socket 512 GB Sun Fire X4800 Nehalem EX 8-socket 1 TB Sun Fire X2270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 96GB Sun Netra X4270 Nehalem EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Blade X6275 Nehalem EP 4-socket 192 GB Sun Blade X6270 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4170 M2 Westmere EP 2-socket 144 GB Oracle Exadata Database Machine X2-8 Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud Westmere EP Nehalem EX 8-socket 1 TB
  • 29.
    29 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Sun Fire X4800 New World Record - SAP Sales and Distribution Parallel Standard Application Benchmark (September 20, 2010) New World Record - SPEC OMP2001 Benchmark (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SPEC OMP2001L Benchmark (June 28, 2010) Sun Fire X4470 New World Record - SPECint_rate2006 (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SPECfp_rate2006 (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SPECjbb2005 (June 28, 2010) Source - http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/performance-scalability/sun- x86-systems-gateway-082396.html
  • 30.
    30 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Best In Class Building Blocks For the 21st Century Data Centre
  • 31.
    31 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.
  • 32.
    3232 Xeon 7500 seriesdelivers more on-line server transactions than X7460 and is up to 50% faster than AMD & 25% cheaper per transaction! Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 series-based Server platforms 4S On-Line Transaction Processing (OLTP) Warehouse Database Performance Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, Go to: http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/benchmark_limitations.htm. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Xeon X7460 – Intel® Xeon® Processor X7460 (“Dunnington 2.66GHz”, Six-Core) Xeon X7560 – Intel® Xeon® Processor X7560 (“Nehalem-EX 2.26GHz”, Eight-Core) Opteron 6176SE – AMD Opteron* Model 6176SE (“Magny-Cours 2.30GHz”, 12-Core) 318,407 516,752 639,253 1,807,347 1,193,472 Xeon 7140 (4P/8C/16T, 16M, 3.40GHz, 800MHz FSB) Xeon X7350 (4P/16C/16T, 8M, 2.93GHz, 1066MHz FSB) Xeon X7460 (4P/24C/24T, 16M, 2.66GHz, 1066MHz FSB) Xeon X7560 (4P/32C/64T, 24M, 2.26GHz, 6.4GT/s QPI) Opteron 6176SE (4P/48C/48T, 12M, 2.3GHz) TPC Benchmark* C Faster database servers for Online Transactions Transactions per minute C Higher is better Source: Comparison based on results published at www.tpc.org as of 25 August 2010. See notes or backup section for configuration details. 2.8x P=Processors, C=Cores, T=Threads Xeon 7140 – Intel® Xeon® Processor 7140 (“Tulsa 3.40GHz”, Dual-Core) Xeon X7350 – Intel® Xeon® Processor X7350 (“Tigerton 2.93GHz”, Quad-Core) 256GB 1,024GB 512GB $2.59/ tpmC $1.88/ tpmC $0.97/ tpmC $0.49/ tpmC $0.68/ tpmC
  • 33.
    33 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Claim Backup 60% Performance, 40% Perf/Watt, and 30% Lower Power • Up to 1.6x performance compared to Xeon 5500 series claim supported by a CPU intensive benchmark (Blackscholes). Intel internal measurement. (Feb 25, 2010) – Configuration details: - Blackscholes* – Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds. – New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds. • Up to 40% higher performance/watt compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor 5500 Series claim supported by performance results on a server side java benchmark in conjunction with power consumption across a load line. Intel internal measurement (Jan 15, 2010) – Baseline platform: Intel preproduction server platform with two Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® processor X5570, 2.93 GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4QPI, 8GB memory (4x2GB DDR3-1333), 1 PSU, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2. Intel internal measurement as of January 15,2010. – New platform: Intel preproduction server platform with two six-Core Intel® Xeon® processor X5670, 2.93 GHz, 12MB L3 cache, 6.4QPI, 8GB memory (4x2GB DDR3-1333), 1 PSU, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2. Intel internal measurement as of January 15, 2010. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5600 series with Intel microarchitecture Nehalem delivers similar performance as previous-generation servers but uses up to 30 percent less power – Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark: - Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S5 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor sX5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev. R1.09 , Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 5 x Fans, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Fujitsu MBD2147RC 147GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, 1x800W PSU, SLES 11 (X86_64) Kernel 2.6.27.19-5-default. Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 250. http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=0140b19d-56e3-4b24-a01e-26b8a80cfe53 – New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Hex-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev R1.00A , Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 5 x Fans, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 LV DR registered ECC), 1 x Fujitsu MBD2147RC 147GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, 1x800W PSU, SLES 11 (X86_64) Kernel 2.6.27.19-5-default. Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 250 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=4af74e10-24b1-4cf8-bb3b-9c4f5f177389
  • 34.
    34 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Summary Backup Mainstream Server Benchmarks 42% gain on Single Node server SPECpower*_ssj2008 at similar power level over previous generation processors supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Referenced as published at 2053 overall ssj_ops/watt http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q4/power_ssj2008- 20091023-00205.html • New Configuration and Score: IBM x3650 M3 was configured with the Intel Xeon Processor X5670 (2.93GHz, 256KB L2 cache per core, 12MB L3 cache per processor—12 cores/2 chips/6 cores per chip) and 12GB of PC3L-10600R(6 x 2GB) memory and ran IBM Java™6 Runtime Environment and Microsoft® Windows® Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition. Score: 2,927 overall ssj_ops/watt. Submitted and in review at www.spec.org 46% gain on SPECjbb2005 supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 632,425 bops, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 158106 http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2005/results/res2010q1/jbb2005-20100210- 00803.html • New Configuration and Score: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, Data Reuse Optimization disabled, all prefetchers disabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Seagate 73GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows Server 2008 amd64-64 jvmwa6460sr6-20090923_42924). Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECjbb2005 score: bops= 928393, bops/JVM= 154732 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=71488796-7a53-46b8-9163-61373214c2ef 27% boost on SAP ERP 6.0 Unicode over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 3800 Number of SAP SD benchmark users http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C259FFE6AB54898440C838DED66684AFD7D58B23A917F4C0D • New Configuration and Score : Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), 88 GB main memory, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2008, SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode). Source: www.sap.com Score: 4860 Number of SAP SD benchmark users 40% gain on SPECint_rate_2006 over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Score: 253 • http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100202-09561.html • New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 12 workloads: 355 42% gain on VMMark* over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Cisco result referenced as published at 25.06 at 17 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Cisco-2010-01-12-B200M1.pdf • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Cisco UCS B250 M2 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, 6-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 192GB memory (48x4GB DDR3 1333), EMC CLARiiON CX4-240 storage system with 25x73GB SSD, 20 x 450GB 15K RPM, 5 x 300GB 15K RPM, VMware vSphere 4,0 U1 Source: www.cisco.com. Score of 35.83@26 tiles. For more information see: www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/ps10265/at_work_promo.html#~industry_benchmarks.
  • 35.
    35 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Summary Backup Technical Computing Benchmarks • STREAM: Baseline Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing TR1012. Score of workloads: 36588.0 MB/s New Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: MB/s. • CAE: Baseline Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications New Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications • SPECfp_rate: 25% gain on SPECfp_rate_base2006 over previous generation supported by the following: Baseline Configuration and Score: Score 197, Referenced as published at http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q2/cpu2006-20090511-07354.html New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 17 workloads: 248. • LIFE SCIENCES: Baseline Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications New Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications • LINPACK: Baseline Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 02/23/2009, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U3 kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 for x86_64). Source: Intel internal testing TR1011A. Score of workloads: 91 GFlops. New Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex- core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 146 GFlops. • BLACKSCHOLES*: Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds. New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds.
  • 36.
    36 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 5 Month Single Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back Up • 5 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Single Core Intel® Xeon® 3.80 with 2M L2 Cache and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 15x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon Processor 3.80Ghz with 2M L2 Cache, 800 FSB, 8x1GB DDR2-400 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
  • 37.
    37 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Single Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel® Xeon® 3.8GHz with 2M cache Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz) Performance per Server 1 Up to 15x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power Idle / Active Power 228W idle / 382W active 117W idle / 383W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 315 21 ~ 15:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 15 racks 1 rack 15:1 Rack Consolidation Annual Server kWh 772,904 37,938 Up to 95% lower energy costs Total Annual Energy Costs $154,581 $7,588 $146,993 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor Operating System Licensing Costs $283,500 $18,900 $264,600 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $411,593 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 5 months
  • 38.
    38 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 15 Month Dual Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back up • 15 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Dual Core Intel® Xeon® 5160 (3.0GHz) and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 5x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two Dual-core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160, 3.33GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 8x2GB FBDMIMM DDR2-667 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
  • 39.
    39 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Dual Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel Xeon 5100 series (3.00GHz) Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz) Performance per Server 1 Up to 5x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power Idle / Active Power 252W idle / 354W active 117W idle / 383W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 105 21 5:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 5 racks 1 rack 5:1 Rack Consolidation Annual kWhr 281,883 37,938 Estimated 85% lower energy costs Annual Energy Costs $56,376 $7,588 $45,169 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor OS Licensing Costs $94,500 $18,900 $75,600 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $120,769 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 15 months
  • 40.
    40 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 283.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 334.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 269.0. • X5660: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 326.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 316.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 218.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 211.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 143.0. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 137.0. • E503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.9. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 259.0.
  • 41.
    41 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECfp_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 247.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 213.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 235.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 206.0. • X5660: upermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 232.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 171.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 168.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 164.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 119.8. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 117.0. • E5503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.6. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 189.0.
  • 42.
    42 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Xeon® L5600 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 269 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10097.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 181 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10131.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 136 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10135.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 193 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10098.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 134 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10132.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 116 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10136.html Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of April 16, 2010
  • 43.
    43 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Xeon® L5500 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 194 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08776.html – L5520: UCS C210 M1.Score: 188 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100119-09411.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 133 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08772.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System x3550 M2. Score: 158 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091007-08823.html – L5520: PowerEdge R510. Score: 155 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091012-08892.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 115 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08775.html Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of March 24, 2010
  • 44.
    44 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Integer Throughput Performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006 benchmark Comparison based on published/submitted results to www.spec.org as of February 2010. • Intel® Xeon® processor 3.80 with 2M L2 cache based platform details • HP* ProLiant* DL380 G4 server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon processor 3.80GHz with 2M L2 cache, 800 FSB, 8GB memory, Microsoft Windows Server 2003* Ent. SP1, Intel® C++ Compiler 9.1 for 32-bit apps, Build 20060323Z Package ID: W_CC_P_9.1.020. Referenced as published at 20.9. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q3/cpu2006-20060513-00027.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • IBM System X* 3550 platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00GHz, 4Mb L2 cache, 16GB memory (8 x 2GB DDR2-5300F ECC), SUSE* Linux* Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64) 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux* version 10.0. Published in August 2007. Referenced as published at 60.8. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q3/cpu2006-20070803-01638.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two Intel Xeon X5365, 3.00 GHz, 1333MHz system, 8 MB (4 MB shared / 2 cores L3 Cache), 16GB memory (8x2 GB 667 MHz ECC CL5 FB-DIMM), SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 10 Compiler: Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64. Published August 2007. Referenced as published at 99.1. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20070916-02063.html • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY* RX200 S4 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 12MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 16GB memory (8x2GB DDR2 PC2- 5300F, 2 rank, CAS 5-5-5, with ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-smp*, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32* and Linux64* version 11.0 build 20080730. Referenced as published at 140. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080901-05156.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details • ASUS Z8PE-D12X based server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 24 GB memory (6x4GB PC3-10600R, CL9-9-9, ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.34-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64 version 11.0 build 20090131. Referenced as published at 241. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q1/cpu2006-20090316-06703.html • • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (WSM-EP) platform (Score: 352) • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series SPECint*_rate_base2006 Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010.
  • 45.
    45 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series VMmark* Performance (generational) • Virtualization Performance on VMware* ESX using VMmark* benchmark • Comparison based on published/submitted/approved results as of April 27, 2009. Results are posted at http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge* 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00Ghz, 4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory (8x4GB 667MHz ECC CL5 DDR2 FB-DIMM), VMware ESX Server* V3.0.1. Published at 3.89@3 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark_dell3.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5365 3.00GHz, 2x4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory, VMware ESX Server V3.0.1.Published at 7.03@5 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/vmmark_dell2.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • HP Proliant* ML370 G5 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 2x6MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 48GB memory, VMware ESX V3.5. Update 3 Published at 9.15@7 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-HP-2008- 10-09-ML370.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details: • Dell PowerEdge* R710 Server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 96 GB memory (12x8 GB DDR3-1066MHz), VMware ESX v4.0. VMmark V1.1. Result measured at 24.0@17 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Dell-2009-04-21-R710.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 based platform details: • Intel reference platform using two Intel Xeon processors X5680 (12 M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 96 GB memory (12x 8 GB DDR3-800 Reg ECC DIMMs), VMware ESX* V4.0 Update 1. Performance measured at 32.25@ 26 tiles. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010
  • 46.
    46 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. DDR3L Power Testing: System Configuration Item Details Server Intel 1U S5500WBV server Processor 2x Xeon® X5650 (Westmere 2.66GHz, 6 cores, 95W TDP, pre-production parts) Power Supply 1x 450W PSU Hard Disk: 1x Seagate Barracuda 120GB, ST3120026AS Memory: 4x4GB DDR3-1333 2 DIMMs installed per CPU Before (1.5v): Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 After (1.35v): Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load line Power measurement at the wall using same system configuration; memory was the only variable changed Before: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 (1.5V) After: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 (1.35V) Note: System level power reductions of 0.52W at idle and 1.42W under 100% load were approx the same per DIMM with 6 DIMMs installed
  • 47.
    47 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Tick-Tock Development Model Sustained Microprocessor Leadership Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Intel® Core™ Microarchitecture Nehalem Microarchitecture Sandy Bridge Microarchitecture 65nm 45nm 32nm 22nm Intel® Xeon® 5600 Intel’s first 32nm SERVER processor with 6 cores and 12 threads
  • 48.
    48 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Tick-Tock Development Model Sustained Microprocessor Leadership Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Intel® Core™ Microarchitecture Nehalem Microarchitecture Sandy Bridge Microarchitecture 65nm 45nm 32nm 22nm Intel® Xeon® 7500 Intel’s first 45nm SERVER processor with 8 cores and 16 threads
  • 49.
    49 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® AES-NI Ecosystem Usage Model Application/OS Description Status Secure Transactions Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 IIS for SSL/TLS Available now OpenSSL patch Intel(R) AES-NI enabled SSL patches Available now RHEL6 beta OS with openSSL Available now Fedora 12 OS with openSSL Available now Full Disk Encryption (FDE) McAfee FDE software Available now Microsoft bitlocker Bitlocker for FDE Available now Checkpoint Endpoint security R73, FDE 7.4 HFA1 Available now Enterprise Software Oracle Berkeley database Available Now VMware vSphere 4.1 Provides pass through support for Intel® AES-NI Available now Tools/Libraries Compilers Intel V11.0, GCC v4.4.0, MS VS 2008 SP1 Compilers Available now Libraries Microsoft* OS CNG library WS2008R2, IPP crypto library v7.0 beta, NSS 3.12.3 Crypto Libraries Available now 49 SSL “Data in Motion” and Full Disk Encryption Ready Now, Enterprise Apps later in 2010
  • 50.
    50 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 3500 16000 20 Intel® Xeon® 5600 Series Encryption Performance Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations. 1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Server. PHP banking sessions /users measured with Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor (WSM, 3.33 GHz) vs Inel® Xeon® 5160 processor (Woodcrest, 3 GHz) and Intel® Xeon® X5570 processor (NHM, 2.93 GHz), 24 SSD RAID 0 arrays, TLS_RSA_with_AES_128_CBC_SHA cipher suite. 2 Oracle 11g with TDE, time takes to decrypt a 5.1 million row encrypted table with AES-256 CBC mode on Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor (WSM, 3.33 GHz) optimized with Intel® Performance Primitives crypto library (IPP) vs Intel® Xeon® X5560 processor (NHM, 2.8 GHz) without IPP. Timing measured is per 4K of data. 3 McAfee Endpoint Encryption for PCs (EEPC) 6.0 package with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 4.5 encrypting a 32GB X25E SSD with Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor (WSM, 3.33 GHz) vs. Intel® Xeon® X5570 (NHM, 2.93 GHz). 24GB of memory. 158 Web Banking Workload (MS IIS/PHP)1 Database Encryption/Decryption (Oracle 11g)2 users DecryptionTime(us) 4.5x Intel Xeon 5100 w/o encryption Intel Xeon 5600 with encryption Intel Xeon 5500 w/o Intel IPP Intel Xeon 5600 -89% Intel Xeon 5500 Intel Xeon 5600 12 -42% provisioningtime (seconds) 23% 13000 Intel Xeon 5500 w/o encryption Full Disk Encryption (McAfee Endpoint Encryption) 3 17 Higher is better Lower is better Lower is better Intel AES-NI Helps Make Encryption More Feasible for More Workloads