NT
Uploaded byNick Turunov
PDF, PPTX1,000 views

Процессор Intel Xeon

The document discusses Intel's Xeon 5600 series processors, including: - Up to 6 cores and 12 threads with up to 12MB cache and improved performance over previous Xeon 5500 chips - New security and virtualization features like AES-NI, Intel TXT, and VT-d - A range of SKUs with varying core counts, frequencies, power levels, and features targeting different workloads

Embed presentation

Download as PDF, PPTX
11 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Процессоры Intel® Xeon® Игорь Рудым Менеджер по развитию рынка компании Intel
2 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Legal Disclaimer • Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations • Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. • Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details. • Intel, processors, chipsets, and desktop boards may contain design defects or errors known as errata, which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request. • Hyper-Threading Technology requires a computer system with a processor supporting HT Technology and an HT Technology-enabled chipset, BIOS and operating system. Performance will vary depending on the specific hardware and software you use. For more information including details on which processors support HT Technology, see here • Intel® Turbo Boost Technology requires a PC with a processor with Intel Turbo Boost Technology capability. Intel Turbo Boost Technology performance varies depending on hardware, software and overall system configuration. Check with your PC manufacturer on whether your system delivers Intel Turbo Boost Technology. For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost • Intel Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, virtual machine monitor (VMM) and applications enabled for virtualization technology. Functionality, performance or other virtualization technology benefits will vary depending on hardware and software configurations. Virtualization technology-enabled BIOS and VMM applications are currently in development. • 64-bit computing on Intel architecture requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, operating system, device drivers and applications enabled for Intel® 64 architecture. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations. Consult with your system vendor for more information. • Lead-free: 45nm product is manufactured on a lead-free process. Lead is below 1000 PPM per EU RoHS directive (2002/95/EC, Annex A). Some EU RoHS exemptions for lead may apply to other components used in the product package. • Halogen-free: Applies only to halogenated flame retardants and PVC in components. Halogens are below 900 PPM bromine and 900 PPM chlorine. • Intel, Intel Xeon, Intel Core microarchitecture, and the Intel logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. • © 2009 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) logo is reprinted with permission
3 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Базируется на лидирующей платформе Xeon® 5500 Перспективная платформа для виртуализации Увеличенная производительность до 40%1 Улучшенная Энерго- Эффективность Новые функции безопасности Серия процессоров Intel® Xeon® 5600 Технология 32нм со вторым поколение High-k диэлектрика • 1 Source: Internal Intel measurements based on Xeon® X5680 vs. Xeon® X5570 – Measured results on SPECint*_rate_base2006 and OLTP workload. See backup for system configurations. Intel® 5520 Chipset PCI Express* 2.0 ICH 9/10Intel® X25-E SSDs Intel® 82599 10GbE Controller Intel® Data Center Manager Intel® Node Manager Technology Intel® Xeon® 5600 Intel® Xeon® 5600 130W 95W 80W 60W (6C) 40W (4C)
4 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Виртуализация & Безопасность Intel® AES-NI Аппаратные функции шифрования Шифрование Intel® TXT Защита при миграции виртуальных систем Защита VMM VM 1 ?? VM 2 VM 1 Intel® VT & Intel® TXT Изоляция виртуальных систем Изоляция Intel® TXT Запускает только подписанные ОС VM 1 VM 2 VMM
5 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced • 6.4 GT/s QPI • 8MB / 12MB • DDR3 1333 • Turbo Boost • HT Standard • 5.86 GT/s QPI • 8MB / 12MB • DDR3 1066 • Turbo Boost • HT Basic • 4.8 GT/s QPI • 4M cache • DDR3 800 80W L5640 6C 2.26 GHz1 Xeon® 5500  Xeon® 5600 Xeon® 5500Применение Xeon® 5600 X5570 2.93 GHz X5560 2.80 GHz X5550 2.66 GHz E5540 2.53 GHz E5530 2.40 GHz E5520 2.26 GHz E5506 2.13 GHz E5504 2.00 GHz 95W 95W 95W 80W 80W 80W 80W 80W E5502 1.86 (2C) 80W X5670 6C 2.93 GHz X5660 6C 2.80 GHz X5650 6C 2.66 GHz E5640 4C 2.66 GHz E5630 4C 2.53 GHz E5620 4C 2.40 GHz 95W 95W 95W 80W 80W X5680 6C 3.33 GHz 130W E5507 2.26 GHz (4C) E5506 2.13GHz (4C) 80W 80W E5503 2.00 GHz (2C) 80W 60W 80W L5630 4C 2.13 GHz2 40W L5609 4C 1.86 GHz3 40W Xeon ® 5600 (Westmere-EP) SKUs Xeon ® 5500 SKUs LowPowerOptions X5677 4C 3.46 GHz 130W Freq-Optimized X5667 4C 3.06 GHz 95W Максимальная производи- тельность 6 Cores 4 Cores (freq optimized) Экономичное Higher Frequency Xeon® E5500 SKUs Лучшая цена/производит. Higher Freq More Cache 1 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1333MHz 2 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz 3 SKU supports 4.80 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz, with Turbo and HT off.
6 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Эволюция с процессорами серии Intel® Xeon® 5600 Xeon® 5300 Xeon® 5400 Xeon® 5500 2007 2008 2009 2010 Xeon® 5600 Intel® VT FlexMigrationпенсионеры Новые серверы для растущего бизнеса Производительно, энергопотребление, виртуализация Совместимость с Intel® VT FlexMigration Расширение архитектуры (Intel® VT, Intel® AES-NI, Intel® TXT) Обновление Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.
7 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 2010 обновление 15:1 Годовое сокращение энергопотребления на 93% 1 серверная стойка на базе Intel® Xeon® 5600 Обновление 1:1 Прирост производительности до 15x 15 серверных стоек на базе Intel® Xeon® 5600 Предполагаемое сокращение годового энергопотребления 8% Тот же уровень производительности 2005 15 стоек одноядерных серверов Intel® Xeon® Серверное обновление: 2010 Физическая консолидация с одноядерных  Xeon® 5600 – или – Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.
8 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Обновление 1:1 Прирост производительности до 5x 5 серверных стоек на базе Intel® Xeon® 5600 Предполагаемое сокращение годового энергопотребления 8% Прирост производительност и до 5x Прирост производительност и до 5x Прирост производительност и до 5x Прирост производительност и до 5x 2006 5 стоек двухядерных серверов Intel® Xeon® – или – Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. Серверное обновление: 2010 Физическая консолидация с двухядерных  Xeon® 5600 2010 обновление 5:1 Годовое сокращение энергопотребления на 82% 1 серверная стойка на базе Intel® Xeon® 5600 Тот же уровень производительности
9 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Платформа для 4 процессоров Intel Xeon 7500 IO HUB IO HUB Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer Память 8 ядер, 64 потока 24Mb кэш L3 Архитектура QPI Буферизованное соединение Intel™ Scalable Memory Interconnect 64 DIMM слотов – до 1 Тб памяти Подсистема ввода-вывода нового поколения с аппаратной виртуализацией
10 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Возможности Nehalem-EX: 8 сокетов Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer Memory Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX IO HUB IO HUB Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX IO HUB Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX IO HUB 8 сокетов и 128 потоков команд Масштабируемость за счѐт модульности Возможности отказоустойчивости уровня Machine Check Architecture High-end системы корпоративного уровня
11 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500/6500 Series Product Options + 1066 Mhz frequency runs at an effective frequency of 978 Mhz when run at 5.86GHz SMI link speed ¥Max Scale Glueless: Scaling capability refers to maximum supported number of CPUs in a ―glueless‖ Boxboro-EX platform (e.g. 8 skt means this SKU can be used to populate up to 8 sockets in a single system) **Max Turbo Boost frequency based on number of 133 MHz increments above base freq (+2 = 0.266 GHz, +3 = 0.400 GHz) ***E6510 may not be scaled above 2 sockets even with a customer node controller 8 and 4 socket/ Scalable Advanced features available on higher end processors Usage Processor Number/Freq ¥Max Scale Glueless Cores/ Threads Cache QPI Speed Max Mem Speed TDP ** Turbo HT Advanced X7560 (2.26GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  X7550 (2 GHz) 8 skt 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Standard X7542 (2.66GHz) 8 skt 6/6 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 130W +1 No E7540 (2 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 105W +2  E7530 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 12M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E7520 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 4/8 18M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 95W No Turbo  Low Voltage L7555 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  L7545 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  Usage Processor Number/Freq ¥Max Scale Glueless Cores/ Threads Cache QPI Speed Max Mem Speed TDP ** Turbo HT Advanced X6550 (2 GHz) 2 skt 8/16 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Standard E6540 (2 GHz) 2 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E6510 (1.73 GHz) 2 skt only 2 skt*** 4/8 12M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 105W No Turbo  2 socket/ Scalable
12 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Прирост производительности Процессоры Intel Xeon® серии 7500 (Nehalem-EX) Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology При благоприятных условиях, увеличивает производительность за счет увеличения частоты процессора Frequency Core0 Core1 Core2 Core3 Все ядра на стандартной частоте Все ядра на повышенно й частоте Core0 Повышенная производительность по запросу Несколько ядер на еще более высокой частоте 4C TurboNormal <4C Turbo Увеличивает производительность потоковых приложений ускоряя обработку и снижая время отклика Повышенная производительность для потоковых приложений Up to 30% higher† Core1 Core2 Core3 Core0 Core1 † Source: Intel internal measurements, January 2009. For notes and disclaimers, see performance and legal information slides at end of this presentation. TDP = 105 Ватт Idle = 10 Ватт
13 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Процессоры Intel® Xeon® 7500 4S сравнение с 2S Xeon® серия 5600 Source: Best published results on SPEC.org or VMware.com as of 29 March 2010. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Почти в 2.2x раза быстрее, чем Xeon® 5600 1.95 2.01 2.04 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.17 2.19 1.00Xeon® X5680 Baseline SPECompM*2001 VMmark* SPECint*_rate_base2006 SPECmpi*2007 SAP* SD 2-tier SPECjAppServer*2004 SPECjbb*2005 SPECfp*_rate_base2006 Relative results Higher is better 4S/64TIntel®Xeon®ProcessorX7560(24M Cache,2.26GHz,6.40GT/sIntel®QPI) Xeon® 7500 and Xeon® 5600 benchmark results represent best top-bin published results as of 29 March 2010. See notes for details. (6C, 12M Cache, 3.33GHz)
14 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced RAS Необходима экосистема Состоит из трех частей: Кремния, Инновация и ОС Mission Critical OS OEM Innovation Intel Silicon
15 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Memory • Inter-socket Memory Mirroring • Intel® Scalable Memory Interconnect (Intel® SMI) Lane Failover • Intel® SMI Clock Fail Over • Intel® SMI Packet Retry • Memory Address Parity • Failed DIMM Isolation • Memory Board Hot Add/Remove • Dynamic Memory Migration* • OS Memory On-lining * • Recovery from Single DRAM Device Failure (SDDC) plus random bit error • Memory Thermal Throttling • Demand and Patrol scrubbing • Fail Over from Single DRAM Device Failure (SDDC) • Memory DIMM and Rank Sparing • Intra-socket Memory Mirroring • Mirrored Memory Board Hot Add/Remove Аппаратное устранение ошибок Функции обеспечения надежности Xeon® 7500 Bold text denoted new feature for Xeon® 7500 * Feature requires OS support, check with your OS vendor for support plans Some features require OEM server implementation and validation and may not be provided in all server platforms Более 20 функций RAS в процессорах Intel Xeon 7500 I/O Hub • Physical IOH Hot Add • OS IOH On-lining* • PCI-E Hot Plug CPU/Socket • Machine Check Architecture (MCA) recovery • Corrected Machine Check Interrupt (CMCI) • Corrupt Data Containment Mode • Viral Mode • OS Assisted Processor Socket Migration* • OS CPU on-lining * • CPU Board Hot Add at QPI • Electronically Isolated (Static) Partitioning • Single Core Disable for Fault Resilient Boot Intel® QuickPath Interconnect • Intel QPI Packet Retry • Intel QPI Protocol Protection via CRC (8bit or 16bit rolling) • QPI Clock Fail Over • QPI Self-Healing
16 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. HW Un-correctable Errors Machine Check Architecture Recovery Аппаратное устранение ошибок на системах Xeon раньше, только в RISC, mainframe, и Itanium системах *Errors detected using Patrol Scrub or Explicit Write-back from cache Allows Recovery From Otherwise Fatal System Errors Normal Status With Error Prevention System Recovery with OS Error Corrected Error Detected* Error Contained HW Correctable ErrorsUn-correctable Errors System works in conjunction with OS or VMM to recover or restart processes and continue normal operation Bad memory location flagged so data will not be used by OS or applications Error information passed to OS / VMM MCA Recovery
17 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Увеличение эффективности 20:1 Снижение ежегодных расходов на электроэнергию до 92% (Ожидаемый результат) 1 стойка с серверами на базе процессоров Intel® Xeon® 7500 Срок окупаемости <1 года (оценка) Источник: Собственные измерения Intel от марта 2010 г. Сравнивались системы на базе процессоров Xeon 7500 и четырехпроцессорные системы на базе одноядерных процессоров Xeon MP. Производительность сравнивалась по результатам эталонного теста SPECint_rate_base2006. Результаты оценки основаны на собственном анализе Intel и приводятся только для информационных целей. Любые различия в аппаратных средствах, программном обеспечении или конфигурации системы могут повлиять на - ИЛИ - 2010 г. Увеличение производитель- ности 1:1 Производительнос ть выше до 20 раз (Ожидаемое увеличение) 20 стоек с серверами на базе процессоров Intel® Xeon® 7500 2005 г. 20 стоек с серверами на базе одноядерных процессоров Intel® Xeon® Обновление серверного парка: 2010 г.
18 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Что еще, кроме процессора 1 Based on Intel internal results. Actual results may vary significantly based on workload and product configurations. See backup for more details on the results. Итоги1 • Up to 46X lower power • Lower TCO (fewer drives) • Up to 6X read perf improvement Итоги1 • Up to 10X increase IO bandwidth • >5X port count reduction • Up to 4.5X power per Gb reduction Сетевые интерфейсы • Unified networking • Eliminate switches/cables • Scalable with multi-core CPUs SSD • Низкое энергопотребление • Высокая надежность • Самый быстрый HDD Intel® 10GbE Intel® X25-M SSDs
19 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.
20 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Summary Backup Mainstream Server Benchmarks 42% gain on Single Node server SPECpower*_ssj2008 at similar power level over previous generation processors supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Referenced as published at 2053 overall ssj_ops/watt http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q4/power_ssj2008- 20091023-00205.html • New Configuration and Score: IBM x3650 M3 was configured with the Intel Xeon Processor X5670 (2.93GHz, 256KB L2 cache per core, 12MB L3 cache per processor—12 cores/2 chips/6 cores per chip) and 12GB of PC3L-10600R(6 x 2GB) memory and ran IBM Java™6 Runtime Environment and Microsoft® Windows® Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition. Score: 2,927 overall ssj_ops/watt. Submitted and in review at www.spec.org 46% gain on SPECjbb2005 supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 632,425 bops, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 158106 http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2005/results/res2010q1/jbb2005-20100210- 00803.html • New Configuration and Score: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, Data Reuse Optimization disabled, all prefetchers disabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Seagate 73GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows Server 2008 amd64-64 jvmwa6460sr6-20090923_42924). Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECjbb2005 score: bops= 928393, bops/JVM= 154732 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=71488796-7a53-46b8-9163-61373214c2ef 27% boost on SAP ERP 6.0 Unicode over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 3800 Number of SAP SD benchmark users http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C259FFE6AB54898440C838DED66684AFD7D58B23A917F4C0D • New Configuration and Score : Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), 88 GB main memory, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2008, SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode). Source: www.sap.com Score: 4860 Number of SAP SD benchmark users 40% gain on SPECint_rate_2006 over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Score: 253 • http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100202-09561.html • New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 12 workloads: 355 42% gain on VMMark* over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Cisco result referenced as published at 25.06 at 17 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Cisco-2010-01-12-B200M1.pdf • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Cisco UCS B250 M2 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, 6-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 192GB memory (48x4GB DDR3 1333), EMC CLARiiON CX4-240 storage system with 25x73GB SSD, 20 x 450GB 15K RPM, 5 x 300GB 15K RPM, VMware vSphere 4,0 U1 Source: www.cisco.com. Score of 35.83@26 tiles. For more information see: www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/ps10265/at_work_promo.html#~industry_benchmarks.
21 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Summary Backup Technical Computing Benchmarks • STREAM: Baseline Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing TR1012. Score of workloads: 36588.0 MB/s New Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: MB/s. • CAE: Baseline Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications New Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications • SPECfp_rate: 25% gain on SPECfp_rate_base2006 over previous generation supported by the following: Baseline Configuration and Score: Score 197, Referenced as published at http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q2/cpu2006-20090511-07354.html New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 17 workloads: 248. • LIFE SCIENCES: Baseline Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications New Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications • LINPACK: Baseline Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 02/23/2009, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U3 kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 for x86_64). Source: Intel internal testing TR1011A. Score of workloads: 91 GFlops. New Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex- core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 146 GFlops. • BLACKSCHOLES*: Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds. New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds.
22 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 5 Month Single Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back Up • 5 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Single Core Intel® Xeon® 3.80 with 2M L2 Cache and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 15x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon Processor 3.80Ghz with 2M L2 Cache, 800 FSB, 8x1GB DDR2-400 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
23 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Single Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel® Xeon® 3.8GHz with 2M cache Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz) Performance per Server 1 Up to 15x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power Idle / Active Power 228W idle / 382W active 117W idle / 383W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 315 21 ~ 15:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 15 racks 1 rack 15:1 Rack Consolidation Annual Server kWh 772,904 37,938 Up to 95% lower energy costs Total Annual Energy Costs $154,581 $7,588 $146,993 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor Operating System Licensing Costs $283,500 $18,900 $264,600 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $411,593 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 5 months
24 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 15 Month Dual Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back up • 15 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Dual Core Intel® Xeon® 5160 (3.0GHz) and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 5x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two Dual-core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160, 3.33GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 8x2GB FBDMIMM DDR2-667 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
25 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Dual Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel Xeon 5100 series (3.00GHz) Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz) Performance per Server 1 Up to 5x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power Idle / Active Power 252W idle / 354W active 117W idle / 383W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 105 21 5:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 5 racks 1 rack 5:1 Rack Consolidation Annual kWhr 281,883 37,938 Estimated 85% lower energy costs Annual Energy Costs $56,376 $7,588 $45,169 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor OS Licensing Costs $94,500 $18,900 $75,600 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $120,769 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 15 months
26 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 283.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 334.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 269.0. • X5660: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 326.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 316.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 218.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 211.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 143.0. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 137.0. • E503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.9. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 259.0.
27 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECfp_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 247.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 213.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 235.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 206.0. • X5660: upermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 232.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 171.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 168.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 164.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 119.8. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 117.0. • E5503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.6. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 189.0.
28 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Xeon® L5600 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 269 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10097.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 181 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10131.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 136 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10135.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 193 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10098.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 134 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10132.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 116 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10136.html Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of April 16, 2010
29 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Xeon® L5500 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 194 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08776.html – L5520: UCS C210 M1.Score: 188 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100119-09411.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 133 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08772.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System x3550 M2. Score: 158 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091007-08823.html – L5520: PowerEdge R510. Score: 155 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091012-08892.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 115 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08775.html Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of March 24, 2010
30 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Integer Throughput Performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006 benchmark Comparison based on published/submitted results to www.spec.org as of February 2010. • Intel® Xeon® processor 3.80 with 2M L2 cache based platform details • HP* ProLiant* DL380 G4 server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon processor 3.80GHz with 2M L2 cache, 800 FSB, 8GB memory, Microsoft Windows Server 2003* Ent. SP1, Intel® C++ Compiler 9.1 for 32-bit apps, Build 20060323Z Package ID: W_CC_P_9.1.020. Referenced as published at 20.9. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q3/cpu2006-20060513-00027.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • IBM System X* 3550 platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00GHz, 4Mb L2 cache, 16GB memory (8 x 2GB DDR2-5300F ECC), SUSE* Linux* Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64) 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux* version 10.0. Published in August 2007. Referenced as published at 60.8. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q3/cpu2006-20070803-01638.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two Intel Xeon X5365, 3.00 GHz, 1333MHz system, 8 MB (4 MB shared / 2 cores L3 Cache), 16GB memory (8x2 GB 667 MHz ECC CL5 FB-DIMM), SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 10 Compiler: Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64. Published August 2007. Referenced as published at 99.1. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20070916-02063.html • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY* RX200 S4 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 12MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 16GB memory (8x2GB DDR2 PC2- 5300F, 2 rank, CAS 5-5-5, with ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-smp*, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32* and Linux64* version 11.0 build 20080730. Referenced as published at 140. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080901-05156.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details • ASUS Z8PE-D12X based server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 24 GB memory (6x4GB PC3-10600R, CL9-9-9, ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.34-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64 version 11.0 build 20090131. Referenced as published at 241. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q1/cpu2006-20090316-06703.html • • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (WSM-EP) platform (Score: 352) • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series SPECint*_rate_base2006 Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010.
31 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series VMmark* Performance (generational) • Virtualization Performance on VMware* ESX using VMmark* benchmark • Comparison based on published/submitted/approved results as of April 27, 2009. Results are posted at http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge* 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00Ghz, 4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory (8x4GB 667MHz ECC CL5 DDR2 FB-DIMM), VMware ESX Server* V3.0.1. Published at 3.89@3 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark_dell3.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5365 3.00GHz, 2x4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory, VMware ESX Server V3.0.1.Published at 7.03@5 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/vmmark_dell2.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • HP Proliant* ML370 G5 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 2x6MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 48GB memory, VMware ESX V3.5. Update 3 Published at 9.15@7 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-HP-2008- 10-09-ML370.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details: • Dell PowerEdge* R710 Server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 96 GB memory (12x8 GB DDR3-1066MHz), VMware ESX v4.0. VMmark V1.1. Result measured at 24.0@17 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Dell-2009-04-21-R710.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 based platform details: • Intel reference platform using two Intel Xeon processors X5680 (12 M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 96 GB memory (12x 8 GB DDR3-800 Reg ECC DIMMs), VMware ESX* V4.0 Update 1. Performance measured at 32.25@ 26 tiles. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010
32 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. DDR3L Power Testing: System Configuration Item Details Server Intel 1U S5500WBV server Processor 2x Xeon® X5650 (Westmere 2.66GHz, 6 cores, 95W TDP, pre-production parts) Power Supply 1x 450W PSU Hard Disk: 1x Seagate Barracuda 120GB, ST3120026AS Memory: 4x4GB DDR3-1333 2 DIMMs installed per CPU Before (1.5v): Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 After (1.35v): Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load line Power measurement at the wall using same system configuration; memory was the only variable changed Before: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 (1.5V) After: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 (1.35V) Note: System level power reductions of 0.52W at idle and 1.42W under 100% load were approx the same per DIMM with 6 DIMMs installed

More Related Content

PDF
9. intel prez sesiune hw
byDoina Draganescu
 
PPT
Как выбрать оптимальную серверную архитектуру для создания высокоэффективных ЦОД
byNick Turunov
 
PPT
No[1][1]
by51 lecture
 
PPTX
Asus x intel 行動裝置研討會0328
byFreddie Huang
 
PDF
Технологии Intel в центрах обработки данных
byFujitsu Russia
 
PPTX
Intel 4th Gen Core Refresh for Enthusiast
byMayura Garg
 
PDF
Intel Roadmap
byJon Saposhnik
 
PPT
Slideshare ctl intel core i webinar 4.2010
byMike Mahanay
 
9. intel prez sesiune hw
byDoina Draganescu
 
Как выбрать оптимальную серверную архитектуру для создания высокоэффективных ЦОД
byNick Turunov
 
No[1][1]
by51 lecture
 
Asus x intel 行動裝置研討會0328
byFreddie Huang
 
Технологии Intel в центрах обработки данных
byFujitsu Russia
 
Intel 4th Gen Core Refresh for Enthusiast
byMayura Garg
 
Intel Roadmap
byJon Saposhnik
 
Slideshare ctl intel core i webinar 4.2010
byMike Mahanay
 

What's hot

PDF
Public roadmap-article
byFREDDY GARCIA - SENA
 
PDF
Intel Public Roadmap for Desktop, Mobile, Data Center
byDr. Wilfred Lin (Ph.D.)
 
PPTX
Clear Linux OS - Architecture Overview
byOpen Source Technology Center MeetUps
 
PPTX
Clear Linux Overview and Engagement
byOpen Source Technology Center MeetUps
 
PPTX
Clear Linux OS - Introduction
byOpen Source Technology Center MeetUps
 
PPTX
Yashi dealer meeting settembre 2016 tecnologie xeon intel italia
byYashi Italia
 
PDF
T310 spec sheet
byagoesimam
 
PDF
Intel Roadmap
byearningsreport
 
PDF
Intel Knights Landing Slides
byRonen Mendezitsky
 
PDF
Dell precision-t3400-workstation-en
byEwerton gon?lves
 
PDF
4th gen intelcoreprocessor family
byAhnku Toh
 
PDF
Sa*ple
byKrishanu B
 
PDF
How to Self-Provision over WLAN with Intel(R) vPro(TM) Technology
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
How to Self-Provision over WLAN with Intel(R) vPro(TM) Technology
byIT@Intel
 
PDF
5 pipeline arch_rationale
byvideos
 
PDF
Prueba
byNicolas Gort
 
PDF
DUG'20: 11 - Platform Performance Evolution from bring-up to reaching link sa...
byAndrey Kudryavtsev
 
PPTX
AMD Opteron 4000 Series Platform Press Presentation
byAMD
 
PDF
BAS004-1_伺服器硬體基礎_v181026
byrwp99346
 
Public roadmap-article
byFREDDY GARCIA - SENA
 
Intel Public Roadmap for Desktop, Mobile, Data Center
byDr. Wilfred Lin (Ph.D.)
 
Clear Linux OS - Architecture Overview
byOpen Source Technology Center MeetUps
 
Clear Linux Overview and Engagement
byOpen Source Technology Center MeetUps
 
Clear Linux OS - Introduction
byOpen Source Technology Center MeetUps
 
Yashi dealer meeting settembre 2016 tecnologie xeon intel italia
byYashi Italia
 
T310 spec sheet
byagoesimam
 
Intel Roadmap
byearningsreport
 
Intel Knights Landing Slides
byRonen Mendezitsky
 
Dell precision-t3400-workstation-en
byEwerton gon?lves
 
4th gen intelcoreprocessor family
byAhnku Toh
 
Sa*ple
byKrishanu B
 
How to Self-Provision over WLAN with Intel(R) vPro(TM) Technology
byIntel IT Center
 
How to Self-Provision over WLAN with Intel(R) vPro(TM) Technology
byIT@Intel
 
5 pipeline arch_rationale
byvideos
 
Prueba
byNicolas Gort
 
DUG'20: 11 - Platform Performance Evolution from bring-up to reaching link sa...
byAndrey Kudryavtsev
 
AMD Opteron 4000 Series Platform Press Presentation
byAMD
 
BAS004-1_伺服器硬體基礎_v181026
byrwp99346
 

Viewers also liked

PPT
Odi Suite – готовая интеграционная платформа на базе COA
byNick Turunov
 
PPT
Tonbeller Ag наилучшие методы осуществления решений, направленных на борьбу с...
byNick Turunov
 
PPTX
джет Dlp или Dайте Lюдям работать
byNick Turunov
 
PPT
Emc выбор оптимальной информационной инфраструктуры для систем автоматизации ...
byNick Turunov
 
PPTX
Kwf Slideshow
byNick Turunov
 
PPT
3 Com новое знакомство с 3 Com и новые возможности
byNick Turunov
 
PPT
Kingston обработка, хранение и перенос конфиденциальных данных – аппаратные...
byNick Turunov
 
PPT
Решения Oracle в области управления идентификацией и доступом пользователей к...
byNick Turunov
 
Odi Suite – готовая интеграционная платформа на базе COA
byNick Turunov
 
Tonbeller Ag наилучшие методы осуществления решений, направленных на борьбу с...
byNick Turunov
 
джет Dlp или Dайте Lюдям работать
byNick Turunov
 
Emc выбор оптимальной информационной инфраструктуры для систем автоматизации ...
byNick Turunov
 
Kwf Slideshow
byNick Turunov
 
3 Com новое знакомство с 3 Com и новые возможности
byNick Turunov
 
Kingston обработка, хранение и перенос конфиденциальных данных – аппаратные...
byNick Turunov
 
Решения Oracle в области управления идентификацией и доступом пользователей к...
byNick Turunov
 

Similar to Процессор Intel Xeon

PDF
Intel on hw
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Cерверы Depo storm 3400 на базе новейших процессоров intel xeon e5 2600v3 fin
byDEPO Computers
 
PDF
Xeon E5 Making the Business Case PowerPoint
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Технологии Intel для виртуализации сетей операторов связи
byCisco Russia
 
PPTX
Hardware and Software Co-optimization to Make Sure Oracle Fusion Middleware R...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Fin...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Austin Cherian: Big data and HPC technologies - intel
byVu Hung Nguyen
 
PDF
Intel keynote
byDoina Draganescu
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Data ...
byIntel IT Center
 
PPTX
E5 Intel Xeon Processor E5 Family Making the Business Case
byIntel IT Center
 
PPTX
Xeon Azure Local Pitch Deck - 25Q1v3.pptx
byUrielrodzmig
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Core ...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 Guide, Silicon Mechanics
bywaltermoss123
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Scalable Processors Enabled Applications Marketing Guide
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel - Nurcan Coskun - Hadoop World 2010
byCloudera, Inc.
 
PDF
Driving Industrial InnovationOn the Path to Exascale
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
INTEL® XEON® SCALABLE PROCESSORS
byTyrone Systems
 
PDF
HPC DAY 2017 | Accelerating tomorrow's HPC and AI workflows with Intel Archit...
byHPC DAY
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Telec...
byIntel IT Center
 
PDF
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Tec...
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel on hw
byDoina Draganescu
 
Cерверы Depo storm 3400 на базе новейших процессоров intel xeon e5 2600v3 fin
byDEPO Computers
 
Xeon E5 Making the Business Case PowerPoint
byIntel IT Center
 
Технологии Intel для виртуализации сетей операторов связи
byCisco Russia
 
Hardware and Software Co-optimization to Make Sure Oracle Fusion Middleware R...
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Fin...
byIntel IT Center
 
Austin Cherian: Big data and HPC technologies - intel
byVu Hung Nguyen
 
Intel keynote
byDoina Draganescu
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Data ...
byIntel IT Center
 
E5 Intel Xeon Processor E5 Family Making the Business Case
byIntel IT Center
 
Xeon Azure Local Pitch Deck - 25Q1v3.pptx
byUrielrodzmig
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Core ...
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 Guide, Silicon Mechanics
bywaltermoss123
 
Intel® Xeon® Scalable Processors Enabled Applications Marketing Guide
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel - Nurcan Coskun - Hadoop World 2010
byCloudera, Inc.
 
Driving Industrial InnovationOn the Path to Exascale
byIntel IT Center
 
INTEL® XEON® SCALABLE PROCESSORS
byTyrone Systems
 
HPC DAY 2017 | Accelerating tomorrow's HPC and AI workflows with Intel Archit...
byHPC DAY
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Telec...
byIntel IT Center
 
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2600 v3 Product Family Application Showcase - Tec...
byIntel IT Center
 

More from Nick Turunov

PDF
Kharkov conference 2011 q4 odrov s.
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Huawei smart grid rus
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Huawei smart grid rus
byNick Turunov
 
PPT
2011 ukraine channel sales business report
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Kharkov conference 2011 q4 odrov s.
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Megatrade артем вижуткин академия цод
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Aflex distribution
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
решения Eaton вадим харитонов
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
лаборатория касперского киберпреступность
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
комплексные решения по гарантированному электропитанию харитонов мегатрейд
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
генераторные установки нового поколения Ipt в.дюбанов
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
блинов 2010 aten lcd_kvm_and over ip
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Stulz mission energy
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Stulz datacentre cooling
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Saa s microsoft spla_kalachova
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Oracle exa2 biz_summit
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Megatrade артем вижуткин академия цод
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Ibm megatrade шиндак xiv v3.0
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Conteg юрий шульга
byNick Turunov
 
PDF
Cisco solutions for dc whiteboarding
byNick Turunov
 
Kharkov conference 2011 q4 odrov s.
byNick Turunov
 
Huawei smart grid rus
byNick Turunov
 
Huawei smart grid rus
byNick Turunov
 
2011 ukraine channel sales business report
byNick Turunov
 
Kharkov conference 2011 q4 odrov s.
byNick Turunov
 
Megatrade артем вижуткин академия цод
byNick Turunov
 
Aflex distribution
byNick Turunov
 
решения Eaton вадим харитонов
byNick Turunov
 
лаборатория касперского киберпреступность
byNick Turunov
 
комплексные решения по гарантированному электропитанию харитонов мегатрейд
byNick Turunov
 
генераторные установки нового поколения Ipt в.дюбанов
byNick Turunov
 
блинов 2010 aten lcd_kvm_and over ip
byNick Turunov
 
Stulz mission energy
byNick Turunov
 
Stulz datacentre cooling
byNick Turunov
 
Saa s microsoft spla_kalachova
byNick Turunov
 
Oracle exa2 biz_summit
byNick Turunov
 
Megatrade артем вижуткин академия цод
byNick Turunov
 
Ibm megatrade шиндак xiv v3.0
byNick Turunov
 
Conteg юрий шульга
byNick Turunov
 
Cisco solutions for dc whiteboarding
byNick Turunov
 

Процессор Intel Xeon

  • 1.
    11 * Othernames and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Процессоры Intel® Xeon® Игорь Рудым Менеджер по развитию рынка компании Intel
  • 2.
    2 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Legal Disclaimer • Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations • Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. • Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details. • Intel, processors, chipsets, and desktop boards may contain design defects or errors known as errata, which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request. • Hyper-Threading Technology requires a computer system with a processor supporting HT Technology and an HT Technology-enabled chipset, BIOS and operating system. Performance will vary depending on the specific hardware and software you use. For more information including details on which processors support HT Technology, see here • Intel® Turbo Boost Technology requires a PC with a processor with Intel Turbo Boost Technology capability. Intel Turbo Boost Technology performance varies depending on hardware, software and overall system configuration. Check with your PC manufacturer on whether your system delivers Intel Turbo Boost Technology. For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost • Intel Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, virtual machine monitor (VMM) and applications enabled for virtualization technology. Functionality, performance or other virtualization technology benefits will vary depending on hardware and software configurations. Virtualization technology-enabled BIOS and VMM applications are currently in development. • 64-bit computing on Intel architecture requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, operating system, device drivers and applications enabled for Intel® 64 architecture. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations. Consult with your system vendor for more information. • Lead-free: 45nm product is manufactured on a lead-free process. Lead is below 1000 PPM per EU RoHS directive (2002/95/EC, Annex A). Some EU RoHS exemptions for lead may apply to other components used in the product package. • Halogen-free: Applies only to halogenated flame retardants and PVC in components. Halogens are below 900 PPM bromine and 900 PPM chlorine. • Intel, Intel Xeon, Intel Core microarchitecture, and the Intel logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. • © 2009 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) logo is reprinted with permission
  • 3.
    3 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Базируется на лидирующей платформе Xeon® 5500 Перспективная платформа для виртуализации Увеличенная производительность до 40%1 Улучшенная Энерго- Эффективность Новые функции безопасности Серия процессоров Intel® Xeon® 5600 Технология 32нм со вторым поколение High-k диэлектрика • 1 Source: Internal Intel measurements based on Xeon® X5680 vs. Xeon® X5570 – Measured results on SPECint*_rate_base2006 and OLTP workload. See backup for system configurations. Intel® 5520 Chipset PCI Express* 2.0 ICH 9/10Intel® X25-E SSDs Intel® 82599 10GbE Controller Intel® Data Center Manager Intel® Node Manager Technology Intel® Xeon® 5600 Intel® Xeon® 5600 130W 95W 80W 60W (6C) 40W (4C)
  • 4.
    4 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Виртуализация & Безопасность Intel® AES-NI Аппаратные функции шифрования Шифрование Intel® TXT Защита при миграции виртуальных систем Защита VMM VM 1 ?? VM 2 VM 1 Intel® VT & Intel® TXT Изоляция виртуальных систем Изоляция Intel® TXT Запускает только подписанные ОС VM 1 VM 2 VMM
  • 5.
    5 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced • 6.4 GT/s QPI • 8MB / 12MB • DDR3 1333 • Turbo Boost • HT Standard • 5.86 GT/s QPI • 8MB / 12MB • DDR3 1066 • Turbo Boost • HT Basic • 4.8 GT/s QPI • 4M cache • DDR3 800 80W L5640 6C 2.26 GHz1 Xeon® 5500  Xeon® 5600 Xeon® 5500Применение Xeon® 5600 X5570 2.93 GHz X5560 2.80 GHz X5550 2.66 GHz E5540 2.53 GHz E5530 2.40 GHz E5520 2.26 GHz E5506 2.13 GHz E5504 2.00 GHz 95W 95W 95W 80W 80W 80W 80W 80W E5502 1.86 (2C) 80W X5670 6C 2.93 GHz X5660 6C 2.80 GHz X5650 6C 2.66 GHz E5640 4C 2.66 GHz E5630 4C 2.53 GHz E5620 4C 2.40 GHz 95W 95W 95W 80W 80W X5680 6C 3.33 GHz 130W E5507 2.26 GHz (4C) E5506 2.13GHz (4C) 80W 80W E5503 2.00 GHz (2C) 80W 60W 80W L5630 4C 2.13 GHz2 40W L5609 4C 1.86 GHz3 40W Xeon ® 5600 (Westmere-EP) SKUs Xeon ® 5500 SKUs LowPowerOptions X5677 4C 3.46 GHz 130W Freq-Optimized X5667 4C 3.06 GHz 95W Максимальная производи- тельность 6 Cores 4 Cores (freq optimized) Экономичное Higher Frequency Xeon® E5500 SKUs Лучшая цена/производит. Higher Freq More Cache 1 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1333MHz 2 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz 3 SKU supports 4.80 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz, with Turbo and HT off.
  • 6.
    6 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Эволюция с процессорами серии Intel® Xeon® 5600 Xeon® 5300 Xeon® 5400 Xeon® 5500 2007 2008 2009 2010 Xeon® 5600 Intel® VT FlexMigrationпенсионеры Новые серверы для растущего бизнеса Производительно, энергопотребление, виртуализация Совместимость с Intel® VT FlexMigration Расширение архитектуры (Intel® VT, Intel® AES-NI, Intel® TXT) Обновление Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.
  • 7.
    7 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 2010 обновление 15:1 Годовое сокращение энергопотребления на 93% 1 серверная стойка на базе Intel® Xeon® 5600 Обновление 1:1 Прирост производительности до 15x 15 серверных стоек на базе Intel® Xeon® 5600 Предполагаемое сокращение годового энергопотребления 8% Тот же уровень производительности 2005 15 стоек одноядерных серверов Intel® Xeon® Серверное обновление: 2010 Физическая консолидация с одноядерных  Xeon® 5600 – или – Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.
  • 8.
    8 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Обновление 1:1 Прирост производительности до 5x 5 серверных стоек на базе Intel® Xeon® 5600 Предполагаемое сокращение годового энергопотребления 8% Прирост производительност и до 5x Прирост производительност и до 5x Прирост производительност и до 5x Прирост производительност и до 5x 2006 5 стоек двухядерных серверов Intel® Xeon® – или – Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. Серверное обновление: 2010 Физическая консолидация с двухядерных  Xeon® 5600 2010 обновление 5:1 Годовое сокращение энергопотребления на 82% 1 серверная стойка на базе Intel® Xeon® 5600 Тот же уровень производительности
  • 9.
    9 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Платформа для 4 процессоров Intel Xeon 7500 IO HUB IO HUB Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer Память 8 ядер, 64 потока 24Mb кэш L3 Архитектура QPI Буферизованное соединение Intel™ Scalable Memory Interconnect 64 DIMM слотов – до 1 Тб памяти Подсистема ввода-вывода нового поколения с аппаратной виртуализацией
  • 10.
    10 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Возможности Nehalem-EX: 8 сокетов Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer Memory Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX IO HUB IO HUB Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX IO HUB Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX IO HUB 8 сокетов и 128 потоков команд Масштабируемость за счѐт модульности Возможности отказоустойчивости уровня Machine Check Architecture High-end системы корпоративного уровня
  • 11.
    11 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500/6500 Series Product Options + 1066 Mhz frequency runs at an effective frequency of 978 Mhz when run at 5.86GHz SMI link speed ¥Max Scale Glueless: Scaling capability refers to maximum supported number of CPUs in a ―glueless‖ Boxboro-EX platform (e.g. 8 skt means this SKU can be used to populate up to 8 sockets in a single system) **Max Turbo Boost frequency based on number of 133 MHz increments above base freq (+2 = 0.266 GHz, +3 = 0.400 GHz) ***E6510 may not be scaled above 2 sockets even with a customer node controller 8 and 4 socket/ Scalable Advanced features available on higher end processors Usage Processor Number/Freq ¥Max Scale Glueless Cores/ Threads Cache QPI Speed Max Mem Speed TDP ** Turbo HT Advanced X7560 (2.26GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  X7550 (2 GHz) 8 skt 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Standard X7542 (2.66GHz) 8 skt 6/6 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 130W +1 No E7540 (2 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 105W +2  E7530 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 12M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E7520 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 4/8 18M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 95W No Turbo  Low Voltage L7555 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  L7545 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  Usage Processor Number/Freq ¥Max Scale Glueless Cores/ Threads Cache QPI Speed Max Mem Speed TDP ** Turbo HT Advanced X6550 (2 GHz) 2 skt 8/16 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Standard E6540 (2 GHz) 2 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E6510 (1.73 GHz) 2 skt only 2 skt*** 4/8 12M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 105W No Turbo  2 socket/ Scalable
  • 12.
    12 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Прирост производительности Процессоры Intel Xeon® серии 7500 (Nehalem-EX) Intel® Turbo Boost Technology Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology При благоприятных условиях, увеличивает производительность за счет увеличения частоты процессора Frequency Core0 Core1 Core2 Core3 Все ядра на стандартной частоте Все ядра на повышенно й частоте Core0 Повышенная производительность по запросу Несколько ядер на еще более высокой частоте 4C TurboNormal <4C Turbo Увеличивает производительность потоковых приложений ускоряя обработку и снижая время отклика Повышенная производительность для потоковых приложений Up to 30% higher† Core1 Core2 Core3 Core0 Core1 † Source: Intel internal measurements, January 2009. For notes and disclaimers, see performance and legal information slides at end of this presentation. TDP = 105 Ватт Idle = 10 Ватт
  • 13.
    13 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Процессоры Intel® Xeon® 7500 4S сравнение с 2S Xeon® серия 5600 Source: Best published results on SPEC.org or VMware.com as of 29 March 2010. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Почти в 2.2x раза быстрее, чем Xeon® 5600 1.95 2.01 2.04 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.17 2.19 1.00Xeon® X5680 Baseline SPECompM*2001 VMmark* SPECint*_rate_base2006 SPECmpi*2007 SAP* SD 2-tier SPECjAppServer*2004 SPECjbb*2005 SPECfp*_rate_base2006 Relative results Higher is better 4S/64TIntel®Xeon®ProcessorX7560(24M Cache,2.26GHz,6.40GT/sIntel®QPI) Xeon® 7500 and Xeon® 5600 benchmark results represent best top-bin published results as of 29 March 2010. See notes for details. (6C, 12M Cache, 3.33GHz)
  • 14.
    14 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Advanced RAS Необходима экосистема Состоит из трех частей: Кремния, Инновация и ОС Mission Critical OS OEM Innovation Intel Silicon
  • 15.
    15 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Memory • Inter-socket Memory Mirroring • Intel® Scalable Memory Interconnect (Intel® SMI) Lane Failover • Intel® SMI Clock Fail Over • Intel® SMI Packet Retry • Memory Address Parity • Failed DIMM Isolation • Memory Board Hot Add/Remove • Dynamic Memory Migration* • OS Memory On-lining * • Recovery from Single DRAM Device Failure (SDDC) plus random bit error • Memory Thermal Throttling • Demand and Patrol scrubbing • Fail Over from Single DRAM Device Failure (SDDC) • Memory DIMM and Rank Sparing • Intra-socket Memory Mirroring • Mirrored Memory Board Hot Add/Remove Аппаратное устранение ошибок Функции обеспечения надежности Xeon® 7500 Bold text denoted new feature for Xeon® 7500 * Feature requires OS support, check with your OS vendor for support plans Some features require OEM server implementation and validation and may not be provided in all server platforms Более 20 функций RAS в процессорах Intel Xeon 7500 I/O Hub • Physical IOH Hot Add • OS IOH On-lining* • PCI-E Hot Plug CPU/Socket • Machine Check Architecture (MCA) recovery • Corrected Machine Check Interrupt (CMCI) • Corrupt Data Containment Mode • Viral Mode • OS Assisted Processor Socket Migration* • OS CPU on-lining * • CPU Board Hot Add at QPI • Electronically Isolated (Static) Partitioning • Single Core Disable for Fault Resilient Boot Intel® QuickPath Interconnect • Intel QPI Packet Retry • Intel QPI Protocol Protection via CRC (8bit or 16bit rolling) • QPI Clock Fail Over • QPI Self-Healing
  • 16.
    16 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. HW Un-correctable Errors Machine Check Architecture Recovery Аппаратное устранение ошибок на системах Xeon раньше, только в RISC, mainframe, и Itanium системах *Errors detected using Patrol Scrub or Explicit Write-back from cache Allows Recovery From Otherwise Fatal System Errors Normal Status With Error Prevention System Recovery with OS Error Corrected Error Detected* Error Contained HW Correctable ErrorsUn-correctable Errors System works in conjunction with OS or VMM to recover or restart processes and continue normal operation Bad memory location flagged so data will not be used by OS or applications Error information passed to OS / VMM MCA Recovery
  • 17.
    17 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Увеличение эффективности 20:1 Снижение ежегодных расходов на электроэнергию до 92% (Ожидаемый результат) 1 стойка с серверами на базе процессоров Intel® Xeon® 7500 Срок окупаемости <1 года (оценка) Источник: Собственные измерения Intel от марта 2010 г. Сравнивались системы на базе процессоров Xeon 7500 и четырехпроцессорные системы на базе одноядерных процессоров Xeon MP. Производительность сравнивалась по результатам эталонного теста SPECint_rate_base2006. Результаты оценки основаны на собственном анализе Intel и приводятся только для информационных целей. Любые различия в аппаратных средствах, программном обеспечении или конфигурации системы могут повлиять на - ИЛИ - 2010 г. Увеличение производитель- ности 1:1 Производительнос ть выше до 20 раз (Ожидаемое увеличение) 20 стоек с серверами на базе процессоров Intel® Xeon® 7500 2005 г. 20 стоек с серверами на базе одноядерных процессоров Intel® Xeon® Обновление серверного парка: 2010 г.
  • 18.
    18 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Что еще, кроме процессора 1 Based on Intel internal results. Actual results may vary significantly based on workload and product configurations. See backup for more details on the results. Итоги1 • Up to 46X lower power • Lower TCO (fewer drives) • Up to 6X read perf improvement Итоги1 • Up to 10X increase IO bandwidth • >5X port count reduction • Up to 4.5X power per Gb reduction Сетевые интерфейсы • Unified networking • Eliminate switches/cables • Scalable with multi-core CPUs SSD • Низкое энергопотребление • Высокая надежность • Самый быстрый HDD Intel® 10GbE Intel® X25-M SSDs
  • 19.
    19 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.
  • 20.
    20 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Summary Backup Mainstream Server Benchmarks 42% gain on Single Node server SPECpower*_ssj2008 at similar power level over previous generation processors supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Referenced as published at 2053 overall ssj_ops/watt http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q4/power_ssj2008- 20091023-00205.html • New Configuration and Score: IBM x3650 M3 was configured with the Intel Xeon Processor X5670 (2.93GHz, 256KB L2 cache per core, 12MB L3 cache per processor—12 cores/2 chips/6 cores per chip) and 12GB of PC3L-10600R(6 x 2GB) memory and ran IBM Java™6 Runtime Environment and Microsoft® Windows® Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition. Score: 2,927 overall ssj_ops/watt. Submitted and in review at www.spec.org 46% gain on SPECjbb2005 supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 632,425 bops, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 158106 http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2005/results/res2010q1/jbb2005-20100210- 00803.html • New Configuration and Score: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, Data Reuse Optimization disabled, all prefetchers disabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Seagate 73GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows Server 2008 amd64-64 jvmwa6460sr6-20090923_42924). Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECjbb2005 score: bops= 928393, bops/JVM= 154732 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=71488796-7a53-46b8-9163-61373214c2ef 27% boost on SAP ERP 6.0 Unicode over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 3800 Number of SAP SD benchmark users http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C259FFE6AB54898440C838DED66684AFD7D58B23A917F4C0D • New Configuration and Score : Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), 88 GB main memory, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2008, SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode). Source: www.sap.com Score: 4860 Number of SAP SD benchmark users 40% gain on SPECint_rate_2006 over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Score: 253 • http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100202-09561.html • New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 12 workloads: 355 42% gain on VMMark* over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Cisco result referenced as published at 25.06 at 17 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Cisco-2010-01-12-B200M1.pdf • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Cisco UCS B250 M2 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, 6-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 192GB memory (48x4GB DDR3 1333), EMC CLARiiON CX4-240 storage system with 25x73GB SSD, 20 x 450GB 15K RPM, 5 x 300GB 15K RPM, VMware vSphere 4,0 U1 Source: www.cisco.com. Score of 35.83@26 tiles. For more information see: www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/ps10265/at_work_promo.html#~industry_benchmarks.
  • 21.
    21 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Performance Summary Backup Technical Computing Benchmarks • STREAM: Baseline Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing TR1012. Score of workloads: 36588.0 MB/s New Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: MB/s. • CAE: Baseline Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications New Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications • SPECfp_rate: 25% gain on SPECfp_rate_base2006 over previous generation supported by the following: Baseline Configuration and Score: Score 197, Referenced as published at http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q2/cpu2006-20090511-07354.html New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 17 workloads: 248. • LIFE SCIENCES: Baseline Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications New Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications • LINPACK: Baseline Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 02/23/2009, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U3 kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 for x86_64). Source: Intel internal testing TR1011A. Score of workloads: 91 GFlops. New Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex- core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 146 GFlops. • BLACKSCHOLES*: Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds. New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds.
  • 22.
    22 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 5 Month Single Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back Up • 5 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Single Core Intel® Xeon® 3.80 with 2M L2 Cache and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 15x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon Processor 3.80Ghz with 2M L2 Cache, 800 FSB, 8x1GB DDR2-400 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
  • 23.
    23 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Single Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel® Xeon® 3.8GHz with 2M cache Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz) Performance per Server 1 Up to 15x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power Idle / Active Power 228W idle / 382W active 117W idle / 383W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 315 21 ~ 15:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 15 racks 1 rack 15:1 Rack Consolidation Annual Server kWh 772,904 37,938 Up to 95% lower energy costs Total Annual Energy Costs $154,581 $7,588 $146,993 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor Operating System Licensing Costs $283,500 $18,900 $264,600 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $411,593 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 5 months
  • 24.
    24 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. 15 Month Dual Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back up • 15 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Dual Core Intel® Xeon® 5160 (3.0GHz) and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 5x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two Dual-core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160, 3.33GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 8x2GB FBDMIMM DDR2-667 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.
  • 25.
    25 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Dual Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel Xeon 5100 series (3.00GHz) Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz) Performance per Server 1 Up to 5x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power Idle / Active Power 252W idle / 354W active 117W idle / 383W active Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 105 21 5:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 5 racks 1 rack 5:1 Rack Consolidation Annual kWhr 281,883 37,938 Estimated 85% lower energy costs Annual Energy Costs $56,376 $7,588 $45,169 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor OS Licensing Costs $94,500 $18,900 $75,600 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $120,769 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 15 months
  • 26.
    26 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 283.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 334.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 269.0. • X5660: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 326.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 316.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 218.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 211.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 143.0. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 137.0. • E503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.9. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 259.0.
  • 27.
    27 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECfp_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 247.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 213.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 235.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 206.0. • X5660: upermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 232.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 171.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 168.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 164.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 119.8. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 117.0. • E5503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.6. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 189.0.
  • 28.
    28 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Xeon® L5600 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 269 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10097.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 181 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10131.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 136 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10135.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 193 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10098.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 134 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10132.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 116 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10136.html Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of April 16, 2010
  • 29.
    29 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Xeon® L5500 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 194 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08776.html – L5520: UCS C210 M1.Score: 188 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100119-09411.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 133 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08772.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System x3550 M2. Score: 158 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091007-08823.html – L5520: PowerEdge R510. Score: 155 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091012-08892.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 115 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08775.html Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of March 24, 2010
  • 30.
    30 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Integer Throughput Performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006 benchmark Comparison based on published/submitted results to www.spec.org as of February 2010. • Intel® Xeon® processor 3.80 with 2M L2 cache based platform details • HP* ProLiant* DL380 G4 server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon processor 3.80GHz with 2M L2 cache, 800 FSB, 8GB memory, Microsoft Windows Server 2003* Ent. SP1, Intel® C++ Compiler 9.1 for 32-bit apps, Build 20060323Z Package ID: W_CC_P_9.1.020. Referenced as published at 20.9. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q3/cpu2006-20060513-00027.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • IBM System X* 3550 platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00GHz, 4Mb L2 cache, 16GB memory (8 x 2GB DDR2-5300F ECC), SUSE* Linux* Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64) 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux* version 10.0. Published in August 2007. Referenced as published at 60.8. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q3/cpu2006-20070803-01638.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two Intel Xeon X5365, 3.00 GHz, 1333MHz system, 8 MB (4 MB shared / 2 cores L3 Cache), 16GB memory (8x2 GB 667 MHz ECC CL5 FB-DIMM), SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 10 Compiler: Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64. Published August 2007. Referenced as published at 99.1. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20070916-02063.html • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY* RX200 S4 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 12MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 16GB memory (8x2GB DDR2 PC2- 5300F, 2 rank, CAS 5-5-5, with ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-smp*, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32* and Linux64* version 11.0 build 20080730. Referenced as published at 140. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080901-05156.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details • ASUS Z8PE-D12X based server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 24 GB memory (6x4GB PC3-10600R, CL9-9-9, ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.34-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64 version 11.0 build 20090131. Referenced as published at 241. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q1/cpu2006-20090316-06703.html • • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (WSM-EP) platform (Score: 352) • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series SPECint*_rate_base2006 Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010.
  • 31.
    31 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series VMmark* Performance (generational) • Virtualization Performance on VMware* ESX using VMmark* benchmark • Comparison based on published/submitted/approved results as of April 27, 2009. Results are posted at http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge* 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00Ghz, 4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory (8x4GB 667MHz ECC CL5 DDR2 FB-DIMM), VMware ESX Server* V3.0.1. Published at 3.89@3 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark_dell3.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5365 3.00GHz, 2x4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory, VMware ESX Server V3.0.1.Published at 7.03@5 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/vmmark_dell2.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • HP Proliant* ML370 G5 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 2x6MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 48GB memory, VMware ESX V3.5. Update 3 Published at 9.15@7 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-HP-2008- 10-09-ML370.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details: • Dell PowerEdge* R710 Server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 96 GB memory (12x8 GB DDR3-1066MHz), VMware ESX v4.0. VMmark V1.1. Result measured at 24.0@17 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Dell-2009-04-21-R710.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 based platform details: • Intel reference platform using two Intel Xeon processors X5680 (12 M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 96 GB memory (12x 8 GB DDR3-800 Reg ECC DIMMs), VMware ESX* V4.0 Update 1. Performance measured at 32.25@ 26 tiles. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010
  • 32.
    32 * Other namesand brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. DDR3L Power Testing: System Configuration Item Details Server Intel 1U S5500WBV server Processor 2x Xeon® X5650 (Westmere 2.66GHz, 6 cores, 95W TDP, pre-production parts) Power Supply 1x 450W PSU Hard Disk: 1x Seagate Barracuda 120GB, ST3120026AS Memory: 4x4GB DDR3-1333 2 DIMMs installed per CPU Before (1.5v): Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 After (1.35v): Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load line Power measurement at the wall using same system configuration; memory was the only variable changed Before: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 (1.5V) After: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 (1.35V) Note: System level power reductions of 0.52W at idle and 1.42W under 100% load were approx the same per DIMM with 6 DIMMs installed