Let's analyze this proposed motion using our knowledge of parliamentary procedure:
- A trustee objects that the motion is absurd and should be ruled out of order. The chair would be justified in ruling the motion out of order since it proposes an unreasonable action.
- A trustee then appeals the ruling of the chair. The meeting would vote on whether to uphold the chair's ruling. It would likely be upheld since the motion is absurd.
- Alternatively, a trustee could move to postpone the motion indefinitely, which would kill it without a direct vote, since it is not a reasonable proposal to consider at this time.
The key points are that an absurd motion can and should be ruled out of order by the chair, and there