Australia has a federal parliamentary democracy and constitutional monarchy form of government. This system originated from British colonization of Australia beginning in 1770, when Captain Cook claimed the land for Britain under the legal doctrine of terra nullius, meaning "land belonging to no one," despite the presence of indigenous Australians. Over the following centuries, Britain established six colonies that were eventually federated in 1901 to form the self-governing Commonwealth of Australia, maintaining allegiance to the British monarch.
An overview of native title in Australian land lawKate Galloway
This is a sketch of the foundations of Australian land law and how they accommodate native title. The story starts with the foundation of Australian sovereignty, the reception of English law and the way in which native title could be recognised in the Mabo decision.
An overview of native title in Australian land lawKate Galloway
This is a sketch of the foundations of Australian land law and how they accommodate native title. The story starts with the foundation of Australian sovereignty, the reception of English law and the way in which native title could be recognised in the Mabo decision.
Forms of government based on persons exercising powers, extent of powers exercised by central of national government, and relationship of executive and legislative branch.
Forms of government based on persons exercising powers, extent of powers exercised by central of national government, and relationship of executive and legislative branch.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
2. OUR GOVERNMENT
• Australia is a federal parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy
• Based on your understanding and learning from last week, write down what this
means in your own words
• Breaking it down into key words may help
3. HOW DID WE GET TO THIS POINT?
• 22 August, 1770
• Captain Cook claims Australia in the name of King George III
• ‘terra nullius’: Latin for ‘land belonging to no one’
• King George gave Capt. Cook specific instructions in accordance with British law
• These instructions concerned whether a land was discovered that was either:
• Occupied/had no sovereign (means ruler) and no system of land ownership
• Uninhabited
• If the land was occupied, Capt. Cook was required to negotiate with the indigenous
peoples encountered
4. ‘TERRA NULLIUS’: LAND BELONGING TO NO
ONE?
• British knew there were Aboriginal people living in Australia
• They considered Aboriginal social organisation and culture to be very primitive
• And therefore that they were incapable of owning land
• This meant they applied the doctrine of ‘terra nullius’ was applied to Australia
• The international law at the time said that this meant that the land could be
taken over and owned by a colonial power
• The land and resources became owned by the colonial power (in this case
Britain) and the Indigenous inhabitants becoming its subjects
5. • If the country was not ‘terra nullius’ (ie. It had inhabitants)
• They would have to negotiate and draw up a treaty
• May have involved purchasing land from the natives or taking it by conquest
• King George III’s instructions to Capt. Cook:
You are also with the consent of the natives to take possession of convenient situations in the country, in the name of
the King of Great Britain, or if you find the country uninhabited take possession for His Majesty by setting up proper
marks and inscriptions as first discoverers and possessors.
6. A TRIO OF LAND CLAIMS & THEIR EFFECTS
1. Capt. Cook decided not to seek and
obtain the consent of the
Indigenous Australians
2. In 1788, Capt. Arthur Phillip settled
in Sydney Cover, with the eastern
coast of the continent being
declared Crown land (land
belonging to the sovereign)
3. 90 years later, the colony of
Queensland (not yet considered a
state) claimed ownership of the
Torres Strait Islands
1. Dispossessed Indigenous
Australians of their land through
‘terra nullius’
2. Began the British ‘settlement’ of
Australia and imposed the laws of
the British Government upon all the
inhabitants
3. Dispossessed the Torres Strait
Islanders of their land
8. • 1788: First fleet landed in Botany
Bay
• Free settlers had no say in the
government of New South Wales
• As the number of free settlers
grew, they demanded a greater say
in the governing of the colony
• The colonists expressed their
belief in a representative
democracy (voting in people to
represent you)
• Each of the six colonial
governments was made
responsible for a whole range of
government activities – such as
road repairs