The document contains evaluation forms for proposals submitted to the ICT Call 11 (FP7-ICT-2013-11). There are evaluation report forms for different types of proposals including Integrated Projects, STREPs, Coordination Actions, Support Actions, CP-CSA proposals in Pre-Commercial Procurement, and ERANET actions implemented as Coordination Actions in FET Flagships. The forms include criteria for evaluation such as scientific and technological excellence, quality of implementation and management, and potential impact. Experts will use these forms to evaluate the proposals received for the call.
Context aware software engineering and maintenance: the FastFix approachWalid Maalej
Context consists of all events which can be observed or interpreted. In knowledge work it includes the actions of the user, the reaction of the applications, and the artifacts concerned. In this talk, we introduce the FastFix approach to context-awareness in software engineering and maintenance. We show how context enables remote software maintenance, as well as a systematic involvement of end users in software evolution. We also discuss other applications of context including personal productivity management and knowledge sharing amongst developers. The main research challenges include the modeling, sensing, sessionization, aggregation, and comparison of context, as well as the protection of the user's privacy.
Using The Advancement Degree Of Difficulty (Ad2) As An Input To Risk Managementjbci
Presentation describes the use of the Advancement Degree of Difficulty (AD2) as a means of identifying risk, cost and schedule associated with maturing technologies.
Context aware software engineering and maintenance: the FastFix approachWalid Maalej
Context consists of all events which can be observed or interpreted. In knowledge work it includes the actions of the user, the reaction of the applications, and the artifacts concerned. In this talk, we introduce the FastFix approach to context-awareness in software engineering and maintenance. We show how context enables remote software maintenance, as well as a systematic involvement of end users in software evolution. We also discuss other applications of context including personal productivity management and knowledge sharing amongst developers. The main research challenges include the modeling, sensing, sessionization, aggregation, and comparison of context, as well as the protection of the user's privacy.
Using The Advancement Degree Of Difficulty (Ad2) As An Input To Risk Managementjbci
Presentation describes the use of the Advancement Degree of Difficulty (AD2) as a means of identifying risk, cost and schedule associated with maturing technologies.
SPE London 'Geomechanics: Quo Vadis?' Event Talk - 27Oct15 Glen Burridge
Introductory talk to frame event & present results of an industry survey forming basis of a “conversation” between both sides of the geomechanics business: The specialist experts in the consultancies and those subsurface staff working within E&P companies.... on where they think the discipline is and where it is going.
Research Activities: past, present, and future.Marco Torchiano
Public seminar for Professor Position at Politecnico di Torino
- past research products
- current research activities
- future outlook
October 19, 2018
This is a special report by IEEE - Power System relaying Committee's Working Group I12 outlining industry practices of Quality Assurance for protection and control design drawing packages. Throughout the electric utility industry, the drive to maximize quality assurance practices has gained increased prominence. These practices mitigate common errors frequently encountered in engineering design packages, specific to
Protection and Control (P&C) design. This report will illustrate industry practices to be applied in a Quality Assurance
Program for protection and control design drawing packages; from conception to final “as-built.” It is the reader’s responsibility to incorporate these practices into their organization’s Quality Assurance Program.
One of the core quality assurance feature which combines fault prevention and fault detection, is often known as testability approach also. There are many assessment techniques and quantification method evolved for software testability prediction which actually identifies testability weakness or factors to further help reduce test effort. This paper examines all those measurement techniques that are being proposed for software testability assessment at various phases of object oriented software development life cycle. The aim is to find the best metrics suit for software quality improvisation through software testability support. The ultimate objective is to establish the ground work for finding ways reduce the testing effort by improvising software testability and its assessment using well planned guidelines for object-oriented software development with the help of suitable metrics.
RoomAlive: Magical Experiences Enabled by Scalable, Adaptive Projector-Camer...Rob Blaauboer
RoomAlive: Magical Experiences Enabled by Scalable,
Adaptive Projector-Camera Units
Download your own copy at:
http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2650000/2647383/p637-jones.pdf?ip=86.85.98.96&id=2647383&acc=OPEN&key=4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E6D218144511F3437&CFID=438188496&CFTOKEN=52535816&__acm__=1412614965_396d64872e01a9e93c70a08be595b64b
SPE London 'Geomechanics: Quo Vadis?' Event Talk - 27Oct15 Glen Burridge
Introductory talk to frame event & present results of an industry survey forming basis of a “conversation” between both sides of the geomechanics business: The specialist experts in the consultancies and those subsurface staff working within E&P companies.... on where they think the discipline is and where it is going.
Research Activities: past, present, and future.Marco Torchiano
Public seminar for Professor Position at Politecnico di Torino
- past research products
- current research activities
- future outlook
October 19, 2018
This is a special report by IEEE - Power System relaying Committee's Working Group I12 outlining industry practices of Quality Assurance for protection and control design drawing packages. Throughout the electric utility industry, the drive to maximize quality assurance practices has gained increased prominence. These practices mitigate common errors frequently encountered in engineering design packages, specific to
Protection and Control (P&C) design. This report will illustrate industry practices to be applied in a Quality Assurance
Program for protection and control design drawing packages; from conception to final “as-built.” It is the reader’s responsibility to incorporate these practices into their organization’s Quality Assurance Program.
One of the core quality assurance feature which combines fault prevention and fault detection, is often known as testability approach also. There are many assessment techniques and quantification method evolved for software testability prediction which actually identifies testability weakness or factors to further help reduce test effort. This paper examines all those measurement techniques that are being proposed for software testability assessment at various phases of object oriented software development life cycle. The aim is to find the best metrics suit for software quality improvisation through software testability support. The ultimate objective is to establish the ground work for finding ways reduce the testing effort by improvising software testability and its assessment using well planned guidelines for object-oriented software development with the help of suitable metrics.
RoomAlive: Magical Experiences Enabled by Scalable, Adaptive Projector-Camer...Rob Blaauboer
RoomAlive: Magical Experiences Enabled by Scalable,
Adaptive Projector-Camera Units
Download your own copy at:
http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2650000/2647383/p637-jones.pdf?ip=86.85.98.96&id=2647383&acc=OPEN&key=4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E6D218144511F3437&CFID=438188496&CFTOKEN=52535816&__acm__=1412614965_396d64872e01a9e93c70a08be595b64b
This is a preview of the new Waarde Propositie Ontwerp by Ostenwalder et cal.
Please download your own copy at
http://www.vakmedianetshop.nl/details.asp?title=waarde-propositie-ontwerp&pr=18189
Course Assignment: Financing and Initiating Major Engineering ProjectsFragoso Josue Muhae
Development of an industrial major project as part of the Managing Major Engineering Projects specialization. The project is premised on the development of a 5-6 km conveyor belt system (ABC Belt) that will service the expansion area towards the south and southwest of the original pit and will depart from current operational area to the processing plants (CPPs).
This seminar gave an insider’s view on bidding for EU research funds. It focused on EU FP7 IST research instruments (IPs, STREPS etc), what they are, how they are evaluated, why bids fail and what a successful bid looks like.
An excellent idea is the basis of a good proposal but is not sufficient….
The expected impacts and implementation aspects are as important ! The proposal should excel in each single criterion !
Be specific in your objectives and expected impacts and clearly demonstrate how you aim to implement and sustain them.
How to write an development project evaluation report. Format and principle guidelines for mid-term and for completed projects. This format can be used for any kind of development project.
Assignment 1/AgileProjectCharterTemplateExample.pdf
C Example Project/Program Charter
Template
THIS APPENDIX CONTAINS AN EXAMPLE of a project charter template that can be used to define the
macro layer in a hybrid, managed agile development approach. This template is provided as an
example and is intended to be customized to fit the project and business environment that it is
used in.
Project overview
Background
Provide a brief description of the background behind the problem that the project or program is
intended to address to a sufficient level to allow the reader to understand the context of the problem.
Problem Statement
Provide a brief description of the problem that the project or program is intended to address from a
business or operational management perspective.
Project Vision
Write a concise vision statement that summarizes the purpose and intent of the project and describes
what the world will be like when the project is completed. The vision statement should reflect a bal-
anced view that will satisfy the needs of diverse customers as well as those of the developing organiza-
tion. It may be somewhat idealistic, but it should be grounded in the realities of existing or anticipated
387
388 E X A M P L E P R O J E C T / P R O G R A M C H A R T E R T E M P L AT E
customer markets, enterprise architectures, organizational strategic directions, and cost and resource
limitations. Consider using the following template:
◾ For (target customer)
◾ Who (statement of the need or opportunity)
◾ The (product name)
◾ Is a (product category)
◾ That (key benefit, compelling reason to buy or use)
Success Criteria
What are the success criteria for the project? How do you know if the project has been successful?
Project Approach/Development Process
Identify the development process and/or any deviations from the standard methodology that will be
used for this project or program.
Project plan
This section outlines the plan for managing the project.
Scope
The project scope defines the range of the proposed products and services the project will deliver.
Scope can be represented using a context diagram, an event list, and/or a feature table. Scope might
be subdivided into the scope of the initial product release and planned growth strategies for subse-
quent releases. It is also important to define what the project will not include, so describe limitations
and exclusions, such as product features or characteristics that a stakeholder might anticipate, but
which are not planned to be included in the project.
In Scope
The project scope provides an overview of the user stories that the project will deliver. Scope might be
subdivided into the scope of the initial product release and planned growth strategies for subsequent
releases.
Release Priority Story # Story Name Description
E X A M P L E P R O J E C T /P R O G R A M C H A R T E R T E M P L AT E 389
Out of Scope
It’s also important to define what the ...
Industry experts, Bob Prieto, veteran executive with Fluor and Parsons Brinckerhoff, and Hans Hoppe with Parsons, share valuable information on the failure points of Mega Projects and proven methods of managing these projects to beat the odds and succeed. It is estimated that 9 out of 10 projects that cost $1 billion dollars or more, go over budget. Learn how we as an industry can change those numbers and improve the way the world builds.
A Critical Technology Element (CTE) is a new or novel technology that a platform or system depends on to achieve successful development or production or to successfully meet a system operational threshold requirement. Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) are a method of estimating technology maturity of CTE of a program during the Acquisition Process. They are determine during a Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) that examines program concepts, technology requirements, and demonstrated technology capabilities.
RMD24 | Debunking the non-endemic revenue myth Marvin Vacquier Droop | First ...BBPMedia1
Marvin neemt je in deze presentatie mee in de voordelen van non-endemic advertising op retail media netwerken. Hij brengt ook de uitdagingen in beeld die de markt op dit moment heeft op het gebied van retail media voor niet-leveranciers.
Retail media wordt gezien als het nieuwe advertising-medium en ook mediabureaus richten massaal retail media-afdelingen op. Merken die niet in de betreffende winkel liggen staan ook nog niet in de rij om op de retail media netwerken te adverteren. Marvin belicht de uitdagingen die er zijn om echt aansluiting te vinden op die markt van non-endemic advertising.
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
Accpac to QuickBooks Conversion Navigating the Transition with Online Account...PaulBryant58
This article provides a comprehensive guide on how to
effectively manage the convert Accpac to QuickBooks , with a particular focus on utilizing online accounting services to streamline the process.
India Orthopedic Devices Market: Unlocking Growth Secrets, Trends and Develop...Kumar Satyam
According to TechSci Research report, “India Orthopedic Devices Market -Industry Size, Share, Trends, Competition Forecast & Opportunities, 2030”, the India Orthopedic Devices Market stood at USD 1,280.54 Million in 2024 and is anticipated to grow with a CAGR of 7.84% in the forecast period, 2026-2030F. The India Orthopedic Devices Market is being driven by several factors. The most prominent ones include an increase in the elderly population, who are more prone to orthopedic conditions such as osteoporosis and arthritis. Moreover, the rise in sports injuries and road accidents are also contributing to the demand for orthopedic devices. Advances in technology and the introduction of innovative implants and prosthetics have further propelled the market growth. Additionally, government initiatives aimed at improving healthcare infrastructure and the increasing prevalence of lifestyle diseases have led to an upward trend in orthopedic surgeries, thereby fueling the market demand for these devices.
The world of search engine optimization (SEO) is buzzing with discussions after Google confirmed that around 2,500 leaked internal documents related to its Search feature are indeed authentic. The revelation has sparked significant concerns within the SEO community. The leaked documents were initially reported by SEO experts Rand Fishkin and Mike King, igniting widespread analysis and discourse. For More Info:- https://news.arihantwebtech.com/search-disrupted-googles-leaked-documents-rock-the-seo-world/
Business Valuation Principles for EntrepreneursBen Wann
This insightful presentation is designed to equip entrepreneurs with the essential knowledge and tools needed to accurately value their businesses. Understanding business valuation is crucial for making informed decisions, whether you're seeking investment, planning to sell, or simply want to gauge your company's worth.
What is the TDS Return Filing Due Date for FY 2024-25.pdfseoforlegalpillers
It is crucial for the taxpayers to understand about the TDS Return Filing Due Date, so that they can fulfill your TDS obligations efficiently. Taxpayers can avoid penalties by sticking to the deadlines and by accurate filing of TDS. Timely filing of TDS will make sure about the availability of tax credits. You can also seek the professional guidance of experts like Legal Pillers for timely filing of the TDS Return.
RMD24 | Retail media: hoe zet je dit in als je geen AH of Unilever bent? Heid...BBPMedia1
Grote partijen zijn al een tijdje onderweg met retail media. Ondertussen worden in dit domein ook de kansen zichtbaar voor andere spelers in de markt. Maar met die kansen ontstaan ook vragen: Zelf retail media worden of erop adverteren? In welke fase van de funnel past het en hoe integreer je het in een mediaplan? Wat is nu precies het verschil met marketplaces en Programmatic ads? In dit half uur beslechten we de dilemma's en krijg je antwoorden op wanneer het voor jou tijd is om de volgende stap te zetten.
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
Buy Verified PayPal Account | Buy Google 5 Star Reviewsusawebmarket
Buy Verified PayPal Account
Looking to buy verified PayPal accounts? Discover 7 expert tips for safely purchasing a verified PayPal account in 2024. Ensure security and reliability for your transactions.
PayPal Services Features-
🟢 Email Access
🟢 Bank Added
🟢 Card Verified
🟢 Full SSN Provided
🟢 Phone Number Access
🟢 Driving License Copy
🟢 Fasted Delivery
Client Satisfaction is Our First priority. Our services is very appropriate to buy. We assume that the first-rate way to purchase our offerings is to order on the website. If you have any worry in our cooperation usually You can order us on Skype or Telegram.
24/7 Hours Reply/Please Contact
usawebmarketEmail: support@usawebmarket.com
Skype: usawebmarket
Telegram: @usawebmarket
WhatsApp: +1(218) 203-5951
USA WEB MARKET is the Best Verified PayPal, Payoneer, Cash App, Skrill, Neteller, Stripe Account and SEO, SMM Service provider.100%Satisfection granted.100% replacement Granted.
[Note: This is a partial preview. To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
Sustainability has become an increasingly critical topic as the world recognizes the need to protect our planet and its resources for future generations. Sustainability means meeting our current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. It involves long-term planning and consideration of the consequences of our actions. The goal is to create strategies that ensure the long-term viability of People, Planet, and Profit.
Leading companies such as Nike, Toyota, and Siemens are prioritizing sustainable innovation in their business models, setting an example for others to follow. In this Sustainability training presentation, you will learn key concepts, principles, and practices of sustainability applicable across industries. This training aims to create awareness and educate employees, senior executives, consultants, and other key stakeholders, including investors, policymakers, and supply chain partners, on the importance and implementation of sustainability.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1. Develop a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental principles and concepts that form the foundation of sustainability within corporate environments.
2. Explore the sustainability implementation model, focusing on effective measures and reporting strategies to track and communicate sustainability efforts.
3. Identify and define best practices and critical success factors essential for achieving sustainability goals within organizations.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction and Key Concepts of Sustainability
2. Principles and Practices of Sustainability
3. Measures and Reporting in Sustainability
4. Sustainability Implementation & Best Practices
To download the complete presentation, visit: https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
2. 2
The following forms exemplify those which will be issued to independent experts
employed as evaluators in the evaluation of proposals received in
ICT Call 11 (FP7-ICT-2013-11)
In this call there will be strong competition. Therefore, edit your proposal tightly,
strengthen or eliminate weak points. Put yourself in the place of an expert evaluator;
refer to the evaluation criteria and procedure given in annex 2 of the Guide for
Applicants. Arrange for your draft to be evaluated by experienced colleagues; use
their advice to improve it before submission.
CONTENTS
EVALUATION REPORT FOR AN INTEGRATED PROJECT ............................................................ 3
EVALUATION REPORT FOR A STREP .................................................................................... 5
EVALUATION REPORT FOR A COORDINATION ACTION OR ERANET PLUS ACTION .................... 7
EVALUATION REPORT FOR A SUPPORT ACTION ..................................................................... 9
EVALUATION REPORT FOR A CP-CSA PROPOSAL IN PRE-COMMERCIAL PROCUREMENT .........11
EVALUATION REPORT FOR AN ERANET ACTION IMPLEMENTED AS A COORDINATION ACTION IN
FET FLAGSHIPS .................................................................................................................13
FP7-ICT-2013-11 Evaluations forms
18/09/12 v1
3. 3
ICT Theme IER
Evaluation Report for an Integrated Project
Proposal No. : Acronym :
1. Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the Score:
call) (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Soundness of concept, and quality of objectives
Progress beyond the state-of-the-art
Quality and effectiveness of the S/T methodology and associated work plan
2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Score:
(Threshold 3/5;
Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures Weight 1)
Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants
Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance)
Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (budget,
staff, equipment)
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
4. 4
Evaluation Report for an Integrated Project p.2
3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project Score:
results (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts listed in the
work programme under relevant topic/activity
Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and
management of intellectual property.
Remarks Overall score:
(Threshold
10/15)
Does this proposal contain ethical issues that may need further attention ? NO YES
I declare that, to the best of my knowledge, I have no direct or indirect conflict of interest in the
evaluation of this proposal
Name
Signature
Date
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
5. 5
ICT Theme IER
Evaluation Report for a STREP
Proposal No. : Acronym :
1. Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the Score:
call) (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Soundness of concept, and quality of objectives
Progress beyond the state-of-the-art
Quality and effectiveness of the S/T methodology and associated work plan
2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Score:
(Threshold 3/5;
Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures Weight 1)
Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants
Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance)
Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (budget,
staff, equipment)
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
6. 6
Evaluation Report for a STREP p.2
3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project Score:
results (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts listed in the
work programme under relevant topic/activity
Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and
management of intellectual property.
Remarks Overall score:
(Threshold
10/15)
Does this proposal contain ethical issues that may need further attention ? NO YES
I declare that, to the best of my knowledge, I have no direct or indirect conflict of interest in the
evaluation of this proposal
Name
Signature
Date
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
7. 7
ICT Theme IER
Evaluation Report for a Coordination Action or ERANET Plus action
Proposal No. : Acronym :
1. Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the Score:
call) (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Soundness of concept, and quality of objectives
Contribution to the coordination of high quality research
Quality and effectiveness of the coordination mechanisms and associated work plan
2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Score:
(Threshold 3/5;
Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures Weight 1)
Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants
Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance)
Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (budget,
staff, equipment)
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
8. 8
Evaluation Report for a Coordination Action or ERANET Plus action p.2
3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project Score:
results (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts listed in the
work programme under relevant topic/activity
Appropriateness of measures for spreading excellence, exploiting results and disseminating
knowledge through engagement with stakeholders and the public at large
Remarks Overall score:
(Threshold
10/15)
Does this proposal contain ethical issues that may need further attention ? NO YES
I declare that, to the best of my knowledge, I have no direct or indirect conflict of interest in the
evaluation of this proposal
Name
Signature
Date
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
9. 9
ICT Theme IER
Evaluation Report for a Support Action
Proposal No. : Acronym :
1. Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the Score:
call) (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Soundness of concept, and quality of objectives
Quality and effectiveness of the support mechanisms and associated work plan
2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Score:
(Threshold 3/5;
Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures Weight 1)
Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants
Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance) [only if relevant]
Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (budget,
staff, equipment)
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
10. 10
Evaluation Report for a Support Action p.2
3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project Score:
results (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts listed in the
work programme under relevant topic/activity
Appropriateness of measures for spreading excellence, exploiting results and disseminating
knowledge through engagement with stakeholders and the public at large
Remarks Overall score:
(Threshold
10/15)
Does this proposal contain ethical issues that may need further attention ? NO YES
I declare that, to the best of my knowledge, I have no direct or indirect conflict of interest in the
evaluation of this proposal
Name
Signature
Date
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
11. 11
ICT Theme IER
Evaluation Report for a CP-CSA proposal in Pre-commercial
Procurement
Proposal No. : Acronym :
1. Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the Score:
call) (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Soundness of concept and quality of objectives.
Progress beyond the state-of-the-art (relevant only to CP part of the proposal).
Contribution to the coordination of high quality research (relevant only to CSA part of the
proposal).
Quality and effectiveness of the CSA mechanisms (mechanisms proposed to achieve the
objectives of the networking and coordination CSA part of the project), and associated work
plan
Quality and effectiveness of the S/T methodology and associated work plan (relevant only to
CP part of the proposal).
2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Score:
Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures. (Threshold 3/5;
Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants. Weight 1)
Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance).
Appropriate allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (staff, equipment …).
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
12. 12
Evaluation Report for a CP-CSA in PCP p.2
3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project Score:
results (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 1)
Contribution at the European level, to the expected impacts listed in the work programme
under relevant topic/activity.
Appropriateness of measures for the exploitation of project results, dissemination of
knowledge, through the engagement with stakeholders and the public at large, and the
management of intellectual property and for spreading excellence
Remarks Overall score:
(Threshold
10/15)
Does this proposal contain ethical issues that may need further attention ? NO YES
I declare that, to the best of my knowledge, I have no direct or indirect conflict of interest in the
evaluation of this proposal
Name
Signature
Date
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
13. 13
ICT Theme IER
Evaluation Report for an ERANET action implemented as a
Coordination Action in FET Flagships
Proposal No. : Acronym :
1. Scientific and/or technological excellence (relevant to the topics addressed by the Score:
call) (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 40%)
Clarity of objectives
Contribution to the coordination of high-risk and high -impact research, for new or emerging
areas or horizontally
Quality and effectiveness of the coordination activities
2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management Score:
(Threshold 3/5;
Quality of workplan and management Weight 20%)
Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants
Quality of the consortium
Appropriate management of the resources to be committed (person months, equipment,
budget)
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.
14. 14
Evaluation Report for an ERANET Coordination Action in FET Proactive p.2
3. Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project Score:
results (Threshold 3/5;
Weight 40%)
Transformational impact on the communities and/or practices for high-risk and high impact
research
Appropriateness of measures for spreading excellence, use of results and dissemination of
knowledge, including engagement with stakeholders
Remarks Overall score:
Does this proposal contain ethical issues that may need further attention ? NO YES
I declare that, to the best of my knowledge, I have no direct or indirect conflict of interest in the
evaluation of this proposal
Name
Signature
Date
0 The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete
information; 1 Poor The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses; 2 Fair
While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses; 3 Good The proposal addresses the
criterion well, although improvements would be necessary; 4 Very good The proposal addresses the criterion very well,
although certain improvements are still possible; 5 Excellent The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the
criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor.