Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to 2016 Fpso World congress NBigle
Similar to 2016 Fpso World congress NBigle (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
2016 Fpso World congress NBigle
- 1. Looking Back InThe Past to Move Forward? - Revisiting Project Engineering and Execution to Reduce Projects Costs andTimelines. Nicolas BIGLE - Turret/Mooring and Hook-up Lead FPSOWorldCongress September 2016 - Singapore
- 2. Introduction FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P1
- 3. Introduction… “Few years ago” FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P2
- 4. Introduction… “The current version” Wake up call ! We all need to specify, design, purchase and built: “Fit-for-purpose” “Cost effective” … Too expensive Too perfect? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P3
- 5. Different streams Standardization • Fewer bespoke solutions • Standard equipment catalogue • Frame agreements “Out of the box” solutions • New technologies • New strategies Simplification • Less optimization • Field proven technologies • Goal setting approach FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P4 Catalogue approach Research and development Leverage contractor know-how
- 6. General concepts • Quality – Degree to which a set of inherent characteristics of an object fulfils requirements • Grade – Category or rank given to different requirements for an object having the same functional use • Requirement – Need or expectation that is stated, generally implied or obligatory (quality requirement, statutory requirement, regulatory requirement) Extract ISO 9000:2015 FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P5
- 7. (Too) High Quality and/or (too) High Grade? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P6
- 8. “Old fashion way” : Past Bibles FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P7
- 9. The rule now… FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P8
- 10. Questions… FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P9 Are we able to specify simple? • Are oil majors and contractor ready to revise their standards? • Are standards still the right approach? • Do we know origin of all requirements and how much they cost? Are we still able to design simple? • Are we clear on what we want to achieve during design phase? • Only relying on complex models? • Is optimization always the best option? Are we able to execute simple? • Are we taking the required steps to execute a project? • Are we not too driven by schedule and risks?
- 11. Why ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P10 “We don't need spaceships to Mars” Peter Coleman -Woodside CEO - LNG 18 PerthApril 2016
- 12. And more to come... Deeper Harsher Older Colder Larger Smarter Cheaper FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P11
- 13. How ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P12 Look for available solutions before designing one • Fit for purpose approach Taylor made solutionRe-use existing
- 14. How ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P13 Think first, model after! (and only if required) • Fit for purpose tools Detailed Pad eye FEA modelCalculation worksheet
- 15. How ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P14 Align approach with targets • Fit for purpose techniques Detailed 3D modelBeams and plates model
- 16. How ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P15 Go deep but only if/when required • Right level of details Detailed 3D model“Past” version
- 17. How ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P16 Focus on the essential and ONLY the essential • Right level of criticality “Engineering precision”“Functional” drawing
- 18. How ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P17 Report efficiently and to the right level • Right level of information Current document storage approachOld fashion archiving techniques
- 19. How ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P18 Do we really need to define everything? • Right level of specifications Prescriptive approachGoal setting
- 20. How ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P19 Do things in the right order • Right timeframe Fast tracking / schedule crashingSchedule development
- 21. To sum up… FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P20 Think first, model after! (and only if required) Align approach with targets Go deep but only if/when required Focus on the essential and ONLY the essential Report efficiently and to the right level Do we really need to define everything? Do things in the right order Look for available solutions before designing one
- 22. To sum up… From a Project timeline perspective FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P21 Right timeframe Right level of information Right level of details Fit for purpose techniquesFit for purpose techniques Fit for purpose tools Right level of criticality Fit for purpose approach Right level of specifications
- 23. But not going back blindly! FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P22 Topsides module in 90’s Topsides module in 2010’s • The journey is still worth – Here for a reason – Don’t ignore lessons learnt just rationalize them • Technical developments – New equipment/material – New philosophy – New issues – New regulations • Trends to consider – Market evolutions – Fields characteristics
- 24. Targets FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P23 Quality Requirements Grade • Quality – Not to be compromised • Grade – Scope management – Enlarge span of available tools – Adapted and adaptable methods • Requirements – Redefine requirements approach – Redefine standards Coming back to the “basics” : To fulfil reasonable requirements with the right approach
- 25. Possible benefits FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P24 CAPEX OPEX Less manhours Schedule compression Increase low cost engineering Increase pool of bidders/ contractors Cost effective equipment Less optimization Risk –based approach in engineering Simple to maintain Less POB required Potentially increase maintenance costs
- 26. Proposed RoadmapNowShortTermMed.TermLongTerm Equipment manufacturer O&G Contractors O&G Companies Regulatory bodies Look ! Find the right battles Perform Risk assessments Perform Cost/Benefit exercises Define adaptive tools Re-define standards Re-define business relations Re-define approach and align codes FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P25 Re-align requirements Develop solutions
- 27. “Gold setting”Vs Prescriptive • Prescriptive – Must comply – Little to no flexibility in interpretation – Inhibit industry innovation – Responsibility seen to sit with the regulator – A false sense of security • Goal Setting – Responsibility with the owner/operator – Outcomes through thorough risk assessments – Aligns effort to comply to risk – Requires reliable systems FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P26 “Do we really need all these costly standards?" Ben van Beurden CEO, Shell
- 28. Do it the “Contractor way” ? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P27 • “Jump into the Known” – EPCI approach – Track records • Enhance standardization possibilities – Standards design – Frame agreement/ partnerships • Open the door to improvements – Discussions/Agreement at design briefs level – Back to the drawing board.
- 29. “Gold setting” : Risk or Opportunity? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P28 “Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing” Warren Buffett
- 30. Potential benefits of goal setting approach FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P29 CAPEX OPEX Mass effect Less manhours Quicker award process Shorter fabrication time Less deviations Less inspections Increase interfaces alignment Responsibility balance Mass effect Easier maintenance Improved Uptime Potentially increase maintenance costs Risk scheme Responsibility balance
- 31. To overcome… FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P30 • Mind set – “There is dignity in difference” – Design / Control approach – Risk strategy • Past trends to reshape – Quality / Grade balance – Requirements / “Nice to have” – Fixed philosophy / Adaptable philosophies • Contractual framework – Cascade Duty Holder R&R to vendors
- 32. Conclusion /Way forward? FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P31
- 33. Questions and Answers FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P32
- 34. Thank you. Nicolas BIGLE FPSO World Congress 2016 - | P33 (+65) 82284135 Nicolas_bigle@hotmail.com biglenicolas Nicolas Bigle