A presentation by Dr. Piotr Kuropatwinski (Gdansk, Poland) at the Veloforum 2011 Conference in Kyiv, Ukraine (www.veloforum.org)

1. COST VS. BENEFITS OF CYCLING DEVELOPMENT PROMOTION Kyiv, Veloforum 5 June 2011. Dr Piotr Kuropatwiński, University of Gdańsk, Pomeranian Association „Common Europe”

2. AGENDA CONTEXT OF ECONOMIC CALCULATIONS SOME PHILOSOPHY EXAMPLES OF APPROACHES ADOPTED ELSEWHERE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

3. SOME PHILOSOPHY

7. CONTEXT OF ECONOMIC CALCULATIONS

9. EXAMPLES OF APPROACHES ADOPTED ELSEWHERE

11. THE SCANDINAVIAN APPROACH

12. FINLAND – JOHANNA KALLIOINEN Source: Johanna Kallioinen, INSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF CYCLING IN TRANSPORT PLANNING ; Velo-city 2003, Paris Circular argumentation in transport planning The modest volumes of cycling The large volumes of car transport Modest resource use to cycling facilities Substantial resources use to car transport facilities Weak competitiveness of cycling Strong competitiveness of car transport

14. Gunnar Lind, Movea Christer Hydén, LTH, Ulf Persson, LTH CBA of bicycle infrastructure source: Sven Hunhammar, Swedish EPA; Cost Benefit Analyses, of infrastructure for cycling, Velo-City Congress, Dublin 2005

15. THE BRITISH APPROACH

16. ROD KING – HILDEN vs. WARRINGTON Hilden spends a fraction of Warrington’s cycle spend Yet achieves results nearly 5 times greater

21. THE AUSTRIAN APPROACH

25. THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN APPROACH

26. FUNDS DEVOTED TO TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN CEE 10+ AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN APPROACH 1/3 Source: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/atlas2007/index_en.htm’

30. SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS

33. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION 

34. THIS PRESENTATION WAS PREPARED BY A TEAM COMPOSED OF : TELEPHONE: E-MAIL: ANDRZEJ B. PIOTROWICZ +48 502 200 559 [email_address] Dr PIOTR KUROPATWIŃSKI +48 501 069 616 [email_address]