Private revieuw 2017 medical crime facts. Ten years of learning and self-correcting did give some results. Patient abuse for other scientific tries (without conscent or need to treat the pathology). In sonspiracy the case is turned down (for the moment).

1. Proposed minor intervention was cutting only a window-opening inside the sub-arachnoid brain-membrane.
The little half circle resulted from the first operation, just the skin was folded aside, and that sufficed largely.
During 2nd
operation more happened then a fenestration between sub-aranoid membrane and cisterna magna.
?? Sinus
Transversus?
The surgery hole in the skull is
at the top of the large incision.
The incision down into the neck
was not needed for this. For
what reason was that needed?
V. Sinus Rectus and V. Transversalis (l) hit?
Foreign body material inside head.
Natural lacking of V. Occiptalis.
Indication of altered anatomic situation, Foreign body material left behind.

2. Craniotomy opening is on the backside of the skull. Michel Suture Clip 16x3 mm would sag down in 6 weeks.
L
R
C3
The sub-arachnoid space in Leptomeningen is + 1 mm.
Clip is placed
mainly past the
vertebral arch.
used
unused
Object left behind right
under the skull, where
officially no surgery took
place.

3. What happened to the
intervertebral disc C2-C3?
Hole
?
?

4. Dimensions of the clip vary. The clip at the AMC sagittal scan differs in position with the other scan-results.
The inter-vertebral disc C2-C3 is poorly visible. With other contrast settings the metal clip is disappearing
almost completely. Another aspect (drilling hole?) becomes visible on C3, which other vertebras don’t show.
spike
Although the coup is at C4
(below the metal artifact), the
scan-image measures a width
of 1mm space inside the
leptomeninges as online also
is mentioned to be the regular
width by the Oxford
dictionary.
The clip has a width of 3mm.
This in itself is already a kind
of health-risk in damaging
pressure at the spinal cord.

5. Significant narrowing of the Spinal Canal at C3 (damage). The cervical object(s) cause a huge distortion.
(In those days I also suffered from a possible lung-health-issue, what is gone now in 10 years time by itself.)
Blood (ferro)-traces on MRI from just under the skin go untill deep into the neck (black line around). Seen
those traces are not just skin-deep but inside the whole backside of the neck towards the spinal cord, this
indicates surgery. (Shape square box in a molar of the lower jaw (r) is visible with contour shape as well.)
Besides the fact that surgery in the head starting from the neck would mean passing the skull basis, and
performing the fenestration from the cisterna magna towards the sub-arachnoid wall of the cyst, this also
would be in essence is surgery in an opposite reversed direction, as it is also opposite of the official report
too going from inside the cyst towards the cisterna magna. The white arrow suggests the sagging down
route, but MRI shows more body-foreign materials present in the neck.
C2
C3
Cistena
Magna

6. So right after the 1st surgery Ct-manipulation was committed meaning premaditated in preparation of the 2nd
operation, where after that 2nd
operation concerning the oral cavity the MRI and CT images finally match.
Therefor it is not sure if the later CT scans of the AMC november and december 2000 are not manipulated.
2
1
Also no foreign material present
in the oral cavity, the neck or
inside the cyst in the head just
before the 2nd
surgical treatment.
Premeditated Ct-scan manipulation
directly after 1st
surgical treatment.

7. Forensic investigation about what had be done inside the neck also has been obstructed by third parties after.
There are more traces of proof, but for this abrigded presentation already motivating conspiracy of silence is.
The scan images not to be made as in a strict rotation of 90° around a vertical axis and upright standing for.
In rotation-investigation it proved out that the rotation isn’t 90 degrees counter-clockwise as X-ray would
show after a rotation from standing with the back to the wall and standing with the left shoulder to the wall.
So what is there to conceal by committing image-manipulations regarding the situation regarding C2 - C3?
Above: Double nametags as sign of reuse of image information.
Here: evident manipulation trace of copying through negatives: Brand
information running black and mirrored on one (resulting) single negative.
Rotation is 60 degrees
around horizontal axis.
(Vertical axis + 30° )

8. So this might be an alternative drainage for compensating the missing V. Sinus Rectus en left Vene transversalis
being hit during that 2nd
operation? Note there is no vene occipitalis naturally, that vene can not have been hit
causing a thrombosis of the left vene transversalis as one doctor falsely suggested. Besides cutting nearby the
continuum sinuum (crosspoint of venes sagittalis and transversalis) is not at the location of the planned fenestration.
Contrastvloeistof ‘vlek’Drainage Indication

9. Investigating the situation before 2nd
surgery showed an intact left and right vene transversalis being present.

10. Then finally some enlargements of 3DVENE scan images showing damage occurred during 2nd
surgery.
DiaSana VEN_3D_PCA AXIAAL

11. DiaSana VEN_3D_PCA POSTERIOR

12. DiaSana VEN_3D_PCA SAGITAAL

13. COMPARING DiaSana VEN_3D_PCA WITH MRI Vessel_Scout_MIP_SAG

14. Also after my stroke 2016 counteracting continued in hiding image information, preventing discovery from.
Re-evaluating the actual performances during 2nd
operation they have been far more than just cutting a small
opening between the sub-arachnoid cyst and the cistern magna. One doctor remarked that the AMC did do
remarkable very little investigation to find out why the cyst started to grow before surgery upon. Another
doctor also said if they were in good intentions secretly, then they also could have told me more after I did
found out some facts already. The case became complex because of counteractions also by third-parties.
But if there is no serious matter to hide why there was much praxis of an overall conspiracy of silence.
In my layman-opinion the fist-wide cyst gave the space to do such an experiment not needed for treating the
cyst, because as reported for the sub-arachnoid cyst only a fenestration towards the cistern magna was
needed. And also leaving an unused Michel Clip behind is also strange when checking performed surgery
before closing the patient. Only on the digital scan that clip was visible, the reports even did not mention the
use of it. In the interest of noble practicing physician and honest healthcare-consumer. Siegfried van Hoek.