Next to the new analysis of the surgery report this is evidence on medical crime in preparation for the ICC. Proof on the active negative involvement by the Dutch legal system in concealment and obstruction of justice will follow later.

1. ABBRIGED SUMARY OF POWERPOINT PRESENTATION SLIDES regarding medical crimes committed by doctors in collusion.
Slide 01 . Anamnesis fist-wide cyst with initial explanation, with closure comment on Factura of findings of (hidden) surgical activities.
Slide 02 . Demonstration motivation (of complaints by) growth of cyst (size) by use of scan-comparing -based upon almost exactly the
same kind of coup -, with next to this a chosen selection from audiological investigations concerning the left ear; both lines are
snap-shots of just before the 1st operation 2000, after the 2nd
operation in 2001 and then a 10 years after, for demonstrating
(concerning original agreed treatment) that the cyst has closed again now. Middle image shows with that little cloud-shape
inside thee cyst, that indeed there was also a window-opening being made at that time between Cyst en Cisterna Magna.
Slide 03 .Result BÄR investigation (2010) and a first MRI-scan rapport (2007) when the cyst started growing again. The complaints are
neurological of kind by growth of the cyst and pressure on Nervus VIII as also was indicated according by MRI reports after.
Slide 4 .The enormous scar on the backside of my head –to me-was a first suspicion, that something hidden had happened, because
(according the report) a same sort of operation I should have undergone as the first time. Next two axial MRI- coups show the
cyst is reaching beyond the Falx Cerebelli now (meaning cerebelli being cut in), next yo the official treatment has successfully
been conducted too, and after at the second surgery foreign-body material has been left behind directly right under the skull.
And finally, a first MRI scan-image with a minor indication of an altered anatomic vein-drainage system (L) inside the head.
Slide 05 . Minor selection of anatomic examples related to the proposed treatment. By with also is pointed out that cutting in the
Cysterna Magna (and V. Sinus Rectus) could not be done by accident (red cross), because they are not situated in the official
operation direction (green circle) seen from the cyst; that cutting is even towards an opposite direction of proposed surgery.
Slide 06 . Mechanical removal of the left Sinus Transversalis (being cut in other direction and not needed for treatment of the cyst).
Slide 07 . Missing the left V. Transversalis and cut off on three places not caused by thrombosis comparing with anatomy and images.
Slide 08 . Just before the second operation the left V. Transverse Sinus was still sufficiently working and seen present on MRI-image.
Slide 09 . V. Sinus Rectus cut off, missing V. Transversalis (L), perforation Foramen Magna(?), foreign-body material inside the head.
Slide 10 . A first hint of a (possible) a vein-deviation compensating the lacking V. Transversalis (L) and the V. Sinus Rectus-function.
Slide 11 . Suggestion of sagging down of foreign-body material (unused Michel-clip 4x16 mm2) into the Leptomeninges (1mm Ø) at the
height of C3. Under: foreign-material still inside the head (?); and image-obstruction with concealing by shielding off scan-facts.
Slide 12 . The impossibility of a metal object 4x12 mm2 sagging into the Leptomeninges with a narrow space of 1 mm wide around.
Slide 13 . Cervical scan image with disturbance from coup 13 further to above (at largest at coup 18 + 22) covering the spinal canal.
Slide 14 . Foreign-body material in mouth and neck is only after the second surgical treatment. Traces of blood starting from just under
the skin of the backside of the neck up to beyond the vertebral arch of C3 vertebral body indicates surgical treatment starting
from the backside of the neck. 3D-MRI scans show the foreign-body material inside the neck is with at least two separate parts.
Slide 15 . The lower object of the foreign body pieces inside the neck is an extinction artefact narrowing (damaging) the Spinal canal.
Slide 16 . Abridged exposition of various attempts on image fraud for concealing the real situation inside the neck with the implant.
Slide 17 . Proof that foreign-body material was placed during second operation inside the molars, wherefore with pre-decided mind a
CT-scan manipulation was committed 8 months before directly after de 1st
operation notably in preparation of the second.
Slide 18 . The image disturbances is to big and divers to be a mere unused Michel-clip which would have sank down from inside the cyst
through the Foramen Magna downwards inside the Leptomeninges. Exposition on test situation proofing false flag rotation.
Conclusion concerning the situation of the neck: the foreign/body material is definitely-more than just a sagged down clip in
the backside of the neck. The vast image/disturbance on the scan with torso supports this vision, next to a possible (?) lung-
ailment, where I recovered from (?)). (Note: Extra remark: I also have had a developing esophagus ailment since. No further
proof is available, but the Garret Ace metal detector recently detected also metal at the location of the bottom of the stomach.
And finally: Demonstration on the rotation-investigation (proof false presentation of image Michel-clip sagged into the neck).
Factura: . Phenestration of Cyst to Cisterna Magna, Cutting in Falx Cerebelli (=side-wall cyst) and violation of Sinus Rectus both sides,
and mechanical removal of the left V. Sinus Transversalis with suspicion of compensation with vein-deviation; foreign/body
material left behind inside the head and (clandestine) surgical also inside the neck; placing material inside some jaws, Ct and
RX manipulation proving (nearly all doctors cooperate in concealing medical crime). Additional investigation is needed about
the situation of the drainage-system of veins now in the head and regarding the true situation inside the neck. Question is:
what is of that much importance to conceal with CT- and RX- image-manipulation and to get involved with image-fraud for?