The Play Oppenheimer Follows The Story Of J Robert...

The Play Oppenheimer Follows The Story Of J Robert...
The play Oppenheimer follows the story of J Robert Oppenheimer and his colleagues on their
journey to discover and invent the atomic bomb. As the book is about the creation of this atomic
weapon, the entirety of it relates to morals in some shape or form. Throughout the reading of the
play I kept thinking about the moral implications of the work they were doing and what might each
individual character be thinking of it. There were two parts of the play that made me really come up
with this question in particular. The first was in chapter 22– Hiroshima, when it was talking about
the bombing of Hiroshima. That whole page was very eye opening to think how so many people
died, even though it helped many more in the end, for those people ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I can agree with the idea that basing actions on morals can help to ensure that people are not being
irrational in their thought processes and that people's needs are more likely put ahead of individual
wants. If morals were not involved, then decisions would most likely be made depending on what
would advance the position of that person the most or on other selfish wants. At the same time,
without morals being looked at, many lives could be lost because there is no clear way to judge
things and come up with an agreement. Without morals, it can be extremely tough to figure out right
from wrong and how a group or individual should act. Conversely, by looking at it from the
perspective that morals should not be the basis of decision making, you can see that if we don't use
them, then many people can get hurt as a result. If people make choices without thinking of the
consequences or about what is important to them and the people around them, the wrong choice may
be made. While morals shouldn't be the only thing considered, they must be taken into account to
ensure the right things are being done. If we only base our actions on morals, then some very
important past discoveries may not have been made. If people only consider morals than not only
will decisions be biased as each person has different morals, but many things in history may not
have been accomplished. For example, the nuclear bomb may not have been invented or people
might
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Robert Oppenheimer : The Father Of The Atomic Bomb
Robert Oppenheimer was born on April 22, 1904 in New York. His parents were German Jewish
immigrants. His dad was Julius S. Oppenheimer and was a wealthy German textile merchant. His
mother Ella Friedman an artist, was from a Jewish descendent. He is often called "the father of the
atomic bomb" since he basically created it with the help of a few other men. He got his P.H.D at the
age of 22 while attending other universities. He later married and had two children. As a kid he
didn't speak German but still managed to learn the language. He spent majority of his life ill.
Whenever he was ill as a young child his mom always took very good care of him by having
whatever he needed to go to him. For example, his barber would go to their house to cut his hair. His
relationship with his mother was always intense. Later in his life he got an award called the Enrico
Fermi.
Around his early life he had a governess who was French and taught him how to speak the language.
He spent most of his time learning about science. At the age of 10 he was already studying minerals,
physics, and chemistry. Robert later pursuit's his hobby at the age of 12. He presented a paper to the
New York mineralogical club and they loved his ideas. Oppenheimer's passion of academic prowess
was at a very young age. Since he got ill after his high school graduation he took a year off and with
his parent's permission he went to Mexico. While he was at Mexico he still managed to whirl
through his undergraduate studies in only three years. Roberts's mom wanted him to become an
artist like she was. For a while he was one and he even did some landscaping for some wealth
people. He ended up quitting and went to college instead. He liked it so much that he ended up
studying at many universities.
Oppenheimer married and had two children. His wife's name was Katherine; she was born in
Recklinghausen, Germany. She moves to the United States when she was just about 2 years old. She
went to a few universities around the 1930s, but had dropped out a few times whenever she got
married. She got married about three times before she met Robert. Her first husband was Frank
Ramseyer and they got married in 1932, but their marriage didn't last. Her second marriage

How Did Robert Oppenheimer Impact Society
Looking down across the vast landscape of Japan, massive skyscrapers reaching for the heavens fill
the horizon illustrating the strength and potential of the nation. However, on August 6th, 1945, one
man's invention would bring this powerful nation to its knees. The brilliant mind responsible for the
atomic mushroom cloud that enveloped the city belonged to a lanky, beanstalk–looking man from
New York named Julius Robert Oppenheimer, who later became known as "the father of the atomic
bomb." Robert Oppenheimer affected society in a positive way through his work in the Manhattan
Project during World War II, his advancements in the world of physics and through establishing
some of the top science research facilities in the country. Robert Oppenheimer, or "Oppie" to his
friends, was an up–and–coming physics ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Education became his main goal after the Manhattan project. Often times, Oppenheimer's impact on
education gets overlooked because of his influence in the Manhattan project. However,
"Oppenheimer was responsible, according to the late Nobel Prize–winning physicist Hans Bethe, of
"creating the greatest school of theoretical physics that the United States has ever known." By
establishing the graduate program at Berkeley, he engendered opportunities for scientists in America
that previously did not exist. When he came to the Institute for Advanced Study, he did much the
same thing" (J. Robert Oppenheimer's Legacy). His influence was so powerful that anywhere the
man went, breakthrough science would follow. The impact he had on education cannot be measured
because of all the different ways he was able to influence science. His colleague said "Oppenheimer
will leave a lasting memory in all the scientists who have worked with him, and in all the many who
have passed through his school and whose taste in physics was formed by him. His was a truly
brilliant mind" (J. Robert Oppenheimer's

Briefly outline the features of 'big science'. What is the...
This essay will explore the varied criteria attached to the definition of Big Science. With such a vast
array of opinions on the subject, an attempt will be made to simplify and rationalise a specific
definition. Examples of The Manhattan Project and the research conducted at CERN will be
investigated to this end, and the former will be examined for its perceived effect on Big Science.
It will be argued that Big Science is simply the industrialisation of Little Science, and that the
differences between the two are a matter of scale and resources rather than a complete change of
paradigm.
What is Big Science?
In order to discuss the development of Big Science it would be logical to have a precise definition,
but the definition is under ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Others have argued that the scale of science has been growing steadily for centuries, and that it is
impossible to pinpoint a definite start for Big Science. Derek J. de Solla Price explained that the
scale of science had been increasing over the 300 years up to the start of the Second World War, and
suggested that Big Science signified the near end of this scientific era. (Capshew & Rader, 1992, p.
7) He also postulated that an entirely different style of conducting science would soon emerge.
Some think that Big Science is the culmination of the industrialisation and commercialisation of
scientific processes and knowledge. (Capshew & Rader, 1992, p. 9) This would imply that Big
Science must have an end in a technological application for use by the investor.
It could also be argued that Big Science is simply the proliferation of new methods of working to the
discipline, as found in large corporations at the time. Hughes points out the car manufacturer Ford
and the technology company General Electric as examples of "innovative production companies"
which required new ways of working due to their expanding workforces. (T. P. Hughes, 2004, p.
383)
Another important argument is that it is not only the centralisation of research facilities that denotes
Big Science, but also the centralisation of decisions. This practice came about as a result of larger
workforces that

Essay On Outliers By Malcolm Gladwell
(–– removed HTML ––)
Seong Hyun Kim(David)
ELA 11
Most people normally bring about personal qualities when they think for the main components of
success. However, Malcolm Gladwell, a famous writer, contradicts the assumption of people
through the book, Outliers. Gladwell insists that extrinsic factors define success rather than the
personal qualities. Nonetheless, Gladwell himself goes against the topic of Outliers in his assertion
about hard working "if you work hard enough and assert yourself, and use your mind and
imagination, you can shape the world to your desires". Although people should work hard to seize
the opportunity for success, success actually came from extrinsic factors because opportunity of
relative age gives physical and emotional advantages through appropriate timing for birth,
opportunity to raise under the concerted cultivation increases one's practical intelligence, and
opportunity to fulfill 10,000 hours of practice guarantees time to achieve success at every field.
For first reason to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To begin with, 10,000 hours of practice is known as the minimal time to become a master in their
own field. It's important to have 10,000 hours of practice, but most of people can't fulfill 10,000
hours of practice because they do not have an opportunity to get 10,000 hours. In the case of
Outliers, Gladwell exemplifies Beatles to show the opportunity to get 10,000 hours of practice.
Beatles could fulfill 10,000 hours of practice in Hamburg for an opportunity to perform for 270
nights in just over a year and a half. Consequently, the Beatles became outliers in their music. The
lesson from Beatles is that people should seize an opportunity to practice 10,000 hours at their field.
Otherwise, the success doesn't approach to individuals. Therefore, the opportunity to fulfill 10,000
hours of practice challenges Gladwell's suggestion of hard

J. Robert Oppenheimer: Dropping The Atomic Bomb
J. Robert Oppenheimer stated, "When you see something that is technically sweet, you go ahead and
do it and you argue about what to do about it only after you have had your technical success. That is
the way it was with the atomic bomb." J. Robert Oppenheimer, in the Manhattan Project, was the
director of the Los Alamos Laboratory and was responsible for the research and design of the atomic
bomb. In the summer of 1945, the first atomic bomb was made and tested, and on August 6, 1945,
an atomic bomb was dropped over the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The bomb killed nearly seventy–
thousand people instantly, which is miniscule in comparison to the thousands more that would have
died if the war would have continued. Dropping the atomic bomb was a just decision because it
saved American lives by avoiding a recreation of D–Day, was necessary to end the war swiftly by
forcing Japan to surrender. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1905, as part of his Special Theory of Relativity, he made the intriguing point that a large amount
of energy could be released from a small amount of matter. This was expressed by the equation
E=mc2. The atomic bomb would bring this theory to life. Einstein was never directly involved with
the Manhattan project or the nuclear bomb itself, but still deeply influenced and advocated the use
of the atomic bomb. Albert Einstein being one of the most celebrated physicists and pure genius
minds to ever live, advocated the use of an atomic bomb. With that being said, if a man of that
caliber is to support such an asset as the Atomic bomb. Perhaps such protesters of the bomb just
don't have the knowledge to fully grasp the benefits of the Bomb. The number of total World War II
deaths are as follows: Military

Nuclear Weapons: The Manhattan Project
The Manhattan Project During WWII there were many different countries trying to develop nuclear
weapons. The countries that were trying to develop them, wanted them because they wanted to the
first nuclear superpower in the world. If any of these other countries 'd developed them before the
U.S. did, the way we live in today's world would've been completely different than what we know it
as. The U.S. started the research on nuclear weapons and they found out that Germany was
researching them. The research on nuclear weapons started in 1940 by the U.S. The big reason for
starting this project was because we didn't want the Nazi's, or Japan to them before we did
(Oppenheimer, J Robert). During the research on nuclear weapons was the fission ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
When FDR gave the ok to start on developing nuclear weapons was when he got a warning from
somebody that Germany was starting the research to develop nuclear weapons (Independence Hall
Association). The reason that we started this project was so that Germany wouldn't have nuclear
weapons first so they could use them on their enemy's during WWII. The project started in the U.S.
in 1939 after Germany started their research on nuclear energy. Another good reason that this project
was started was so that the U.S. could be the first nuclear power country in the whole world. Later in
1941 Einstein joined in on the

Essay on Krishna's World View
Duncan Guarino
James Joiner
PHI150
Mar 26, 2013
Krishna's World View
The Bhagavad Gita uses the conversation between Pandava Prince Arjuna and his guide Lord
Krishna to portray Hinduism world view and Krishna's view on the different fundamental questions.
When he's facing a war, Arjuna is guided by Krishna to be a selfless leader, and dedication to the
cause.
Origin, this fundamental question focuses on why is there something rather than nothing. One
important aspect of the Krishna world view is that, there is one ultimate reality in which everything
was already in existence. The Brahman, as the ultimate reality is known, is what manifested
anything that has been created. Thus, as it is stated in Rigveda, that "existence was ... Show more
""You cannot make out what exists in it, yet it is there. "It is this very fineness which ensouls this
entire world, it is the true one, it is the soul." and "Everything that exists has its self in that subtle
essence."(1.4 1–7) * Krishna pointed out in Bahagavad Gita "that the impermanent has no reality",
that "the spirit was not born; it will never die" and thus, "the spirit kills not, not it will be killed."
(2.16) in the same section, he also described the ones who thinks a spirit kills and the ones who
think a spirit can be killed, are both ignorant. The spirit then in Krishna's view, is immortal and
everlasting. * As the prince asked Lord Krishna on whether he should kill for the war, Krishna used
the arguments above and more to show that there would be transcendence and so on, and when a
person is "killed", his or her spirit would just throws away its worn–out body and enters a new one.
Krishna also addressed the issue of the attachment over reality. * Krishna pointed out that most
people are afraid of death, and that the ignorance described previously is what preventing them from
achieving immortality. Only those who have realized that the impermanent has no reality and the
reality lies in the eternal; and have seen the boundary between these two would have attained the
end of all knowledge. (Bahagavad Gita 2.15) * He sees that the human "seeks only the gratification
of desire as the highest goal; seeing nothing beyond;" (Swami 16) is being

The Manhattan Project: The First Atomic Bomb
The Manhattan Project
What was the Manhattan Project, we know it created the first atomic bombs (see Fig. 1), but how
did it end World War II and use fission to its full power? World War II and the Manhattan Project
lasted from 1939 to 1945. World War II started when Hitler invaded Poland on September 1, 1939.
The origins of the Manhattan Project date back to a letter Albert Einstein sent Franklin D. Roosevelt
warning him of the powers of fission and the weapons it could produce. 60 million people were
killed in World War II and the Manhattan Project resulted in the deaths of 130,000 Japanese
civilians.
Fig 1. The picture above shows one of the atomic bombs produced by the Manhattan Project.
After World War I tensions between countries ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The project was also in need of a strong leader, Leslie R. Groves was selected by the U.S. secretary
of war, George Marshall. Groves was a colonel in thee Army Corps of Engineers, even though he
was a strong leader who would often "bully his way into getting what he needed"(Elish, 19) a
brilliant mind that expertised in science was needed to help Groves. Intellectual and physicist J.
Robert Oppenheimer was selected by Groves Enrico Fermi had developed a system that could create
a fission chain reaction. Upon learning about the system the U.S. government budgeted $40,000 to
construct Fermi's system. This system was of high importance and allowed scientists to use the
power of atomic bombs. This fission process required uranium and graphite to work properly. Fermi
and other scientists chose a squash field located beneath Stagg Field at the University of Chicago to
set off a chain reaction. On December 2, 1942 Fermi and other scientists, using uranium,
successfully produced and controlled a chain reaction self–sustained by

Physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer: The First Nuclear Weapon
Nuclear weapons are weapons that get their destructive power by turning matter into energy
(Kroenig, Matthew). All nuclear weapons are explosive and can be transported in missiles, bombs,
artillery shells, mines, or torpedoes. If a nuclear weapon went off in a in a large city, it would kill
millions of people and destroy the environment and climate. We have only experienced what nuclear
weapons are capable of and the damage they can cause in war twice.
The only two nuclear weapons ever used in combat were by the United States when they dropped
them on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 during World War II. They killed
between 110,000 to 140,000 people and caused great destruction of the cities. This was one of the
major ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Robert Oppenheimer. After successfully exploding the first atomic bomb, he was known as the
father of the atomic bomb. He was born on April 22, 1904, in New York City. After only three years
of study, he graduated from Harvard University, and in 1927 he got his Ph.D. from the University of
Gottingen in Germany. From 1929 to 1947, Oppenheimer was on the faculty of the University of
California at Berkeley, where he established a leading center for research in theoretical physics
(Stanley, Matthew). During that time he directed the Manhattan Project from 1942–1945. Much of
his work that contributed to project was done in Los Alamos, New Mexico. From 1947 to 1952, he
led the advisory committee of the United States Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). While doing
that, he also advised the U.S. Department of Defense and helped write the first United States
proposal for international control of nuclear energy (Stanley, Matthew). During the early 1950's, the
AEC started to question his loyalty to the United States. After investigation, they cleared all charges
on him, but denied him access to any more secret files. In 1963, the AEC awarded him the Enrico
Fermi Award (his highest honor). Some people viewed this as the government's way of apologizing
for their

How Did Oppenheimer Contribute To Science
Regret and Teaching "No man should escape our universities without knowing how little he knows"
J. Robert Oppenheimer, a renowned scientist who created and taught wonderful things Julius Robert
Oppenheimer was born on April 22, 1904 in New York. He always loved science and became a
physics teacher early in his career. Later on, he landed a job as head scientist at Los Alamos, the site
where the atomic bomb was being created. After the war ended, due to the atomic bomb being
dropped, he became a anti–nuclear activist, giving lectures about their dangers, and how they should
not be used. He also went back to teaching theoretical physics at Princeton. Oppenheimer died
peacefully on February 18, 1967 in Princeton, New Jersey. J. Robert Oppenheimer ... Show more
During the 1930s he taught theoretical physics in two colleges in California. He was regarded as an
effective teacher, although his students often said that he set an almost impossible pace in the
classroom. "He inspired many of his students, and some even adopted his gestures and way of
speaking" ( "Notable Scientists," 2008). After WWII ended, Oppenheimer became a big anti–nuclear
activist, despite helping create the atomic bomb. He gave speeches about the dangers and great
threat that the atomic bomb and nuclear missiles pose to the world. J. Robert Oppenheimer, was
without doubt, a marvelous scientist. He was responsible for the creation of the atomic bomb, and
by thinking flexibly, his work led to the discovery of the positron, and the teaching of theoretical
physics and the atomic bomb. Oppenheimer's worked changed the world forever, in both good and
bad ways. His teachings of theoretical physics and the atomic bomb taught people things they might
have never known if it was not for him. You are only smart, when you realize you know nothing
compared to the knowledge the universe holds. Those who claim to be all–knowing are the biggest
fools of

Personal Narrative Essay: Developing An Atomic Bomb
I stare down at my watch engraved with my name, J. Robert Oppenheimer. It clearly read in bold
numerical digits, 0330. I know that in exactly two hours, two billion government dollars would be
tested. The result would change the course of history for better and for worse. I let my mind wander
and stare down at my shoes covered in the dry sand of New Mexico. I begin to go over the possible
outcomes of the test. My eyes became blurry. All of my thoughts swirl around my empty head and
just as I could no longer bear them, sand blows into my face. I glance up and I realize that I had
been talking aloud and my methodical mumbling had caught the attention of my colleagues. I ignore
their stares, compose myself, and calmly walk into a heavily ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When offered to do this, I realized the opportunities that would arise and construction that would
need to be undertaken to accomplish this feat for my country." I began working with Groves four
years ago when I was asked to lead the great and terrible project to develop an atomic bomb that
would swiftly bring an end to the second world war. Looking back on the four year journey, I realize
how excited I would be if the test yielded expected results. Groves collects his thoughts and states
his question in the hopes of getting an extensive answer, "Why did you sign on to this?" "Originally
it was because of the advancements in physics and engineering. Now I do it to bring an end to the
war." I had always assumed this bomb would lead to the end of the fighting and bring peace to the
world by the massive destruction it caused. The government had put two billion taxpayer dollars
into it and the greatest minds of the twentieth century. The result is sure to be impressive. During the
research conducted to create the bomb, I realized how dangerous it is. The magnitude will be
stronger than that of any bomb previously created. This is where my moral dilemma lie. This bomb
will leave many dead by my

Synthesis Essay : ' The Atomic Bomb '
Synthesis Essay – J. Robert Oppenheimer
MSgt Troyann O. Johnson
Air Force Senior Noncommissioned Officer Academy
J. Robert Oppenheimer Take a moment and imagine yourself as a scientist. You're in the
Alamogordo desert. Your hands are sweating but not due to the heat. You're waiting to see the first
detonation of the weapon you developed – the atomic bomb. You're asking, will it work at all? Will
this one detonation destroy the entire world? Then moment of truth, it detonates; you are
temporarily blinded by a bright light and you realize the tremendous power of this one weapon. The
weapon is indiscriminate and destroys everything in its path. Now you ask yourself, "What have I
done?"
This thought, as well as many others, ran through the heads of the scientists of the Manhattan
Project, including the "father of the atomic bomb" himself, J. Robert Oppenheimer.
Even today, 71 years after the first use of the atomic bomb, people praise Oppenheimer's many
contributions to science but also question his ethics in the development of the atomic bomb.
However, I believe J. Robert Oppenheimer was a visionary leader and ethical leader as his
contributions advanced science and put an end to a great war.
In this paper I will review why Oppenheimer is a visionary leader and how his efforts lead to the end
of World War II. I will also cover how Oppenheimer tried to counter nuclear proliferation and why
he is an ethical leader. Finally, I will compare how my actions, decisions, and

Film Review : Film Films
Vinh Tran
Historical Essay Documentary films have been applied to many movies over the course of time.
Even Hollywood people are making "documentary–films". But when a real documentary film maker
makes a documentary film, he wants to change people's attitude. There would be important
information that would make the audience think hard on what they have witnessed. So, people ask,
"what's the nature of a documentary film", "what subject does it have to deal with", and "what is it
doing to this day". Films in Canada and England can make great films but are ramify due to the
mainstreamed trend that they don't see the main point. It first started with Robert Flaherty in 1922.
Robert Flaherty, the explorer, captured man's relationship with the environment on his motion
picture camera. His film was a great success in the theatrical departments. Films including Grass,
Chang, Moana, Taboo, Man of Aran, Wedding of Palo, and others. All of these films had one thing
in common and it was that they showed man in a struggle to survive against nature. To better
understand these films, they were known as "romantic films". In today films, we must appeal to our
audiences through their emotions, as well as through their minds. Documentary films forms and
content are always changing. In the future we will see more personal tales, more synchronized
dialogue, and more attention to the person themselves. Film makers have an understanding of their
jobs and what is ahead of them. There will always

J. Robert Oppenheimer Essay
"There must be no barriers to freedom of inquiry. There is no place for dogma in science. The
scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for any
evidence, to correct any errors. Our political life is also predicated on openness. We know that the
only way to avoid error is to detect it and that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. And
we know that as long as [we] are free to ask what [we] must, free to say what [we] think, free to
think what [we] will, freedom can never be lost, and science can never regress." J. Robert
Oppenheimer A man who is almost synonymous with the development of the atomic bomb as well
as with the conflicts between the desires of the government ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He obtained his PhD afterward in Germany from the prestigious University of Göttingen.
Oppenheimer was always a brooding and intense man. As a youth he suffered some degree of
torment from kids his age for his bookish tendencies. During his college years, he sustained several
bouts of depression. Looking back at his college years, Oppenheimer remarked that virtually
everything aroused "a very great sense of revulsion and wrong." He had a tendency to ask difficult
questions of his professors. After his oral PhD exam, one of his evaluators was reputed to have said
that "Phew, I'm glad that's over. He was on the point of questioning me." In 1929 Oppenheimer
returned to the United States to take up teaching positions at Berkeley and Cal Tech. During the 30's,
Oppenheimer began to become associated with a variety of heavily left–wing organizations
affiliated with Communism. This was mainly due to the repression of several Jewish relatives in
Nazi Germany. He married Katherine Harrison in 1940, who was a member of the Communist party
and had two children. He also started to distance himself from his former leftist friends and groups.
This was probably largely done to make himself more attractive to obtaining the post of head of
development for atomic bombs. Historian Daniel Kevles called World War II the "Physicist's War."
World War II represented the greatest expenditure on a physics program in history. It developed two
main technologies: radar and the atomic

Robert J. Oppenheimer: The Rise Of The Atomic Bomb
The Atomic Bomb was created and used to help end WWII. Many countries came together to help
design and make the bomb. More than 130,000 scientists put their lives and their families lives at
risk by making these bombs. After the bombs were made and the hard decision to drop them ended,
the atomic bomb changed the future forever. Nuclear weapons even made the rules of war change to
save mankind and this planet. Robert J. Oppenheimer was a professor at the University of
California, Berkeley. He was known to be able to understand and idea or concept in the scientific
world so quick that people thought he was a superhero. During wartime he wanted to help out in the
war with his amazing understanding of science and personal charisma. He was announced

Nelson Mandela Character Analysis
Nyayiel Lok
Director Riveroll
Senior Monday
11 Sep 2017
Success is the accomplishment of an aim or purpose. The first person I think of is Nelson Mandela.
Mandela's ultimate success had to do with his character and background. Although he was born in a
royal family, grew up in a divided region of South Africa between blacks and whites. He still
managed to maintain a correct mindset to a path leading to success. You can come from a small
surrounding and have a bigger triumph than someone who comes from a lot more, or it's the total
opposite. In this case, it's the fact that coming from a wealthy family who supports you will get you
anywhere. Gladwell argues that having a superior background means that it is much easier to be
successful ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Which brings me to my next point. One's background definitely has an impact on successful people.
If it were a different person with a different background, hence the situation would have turned out
differently. Many people are born already into an easier lifestyle because of the place their family
has already had. Robert Oppenheimer was a smart guy who turned out to be successful with the
support of his family and wealth. Oppenheimer didn't face the lifetime struggles, Lagan has. But he
did suffer from depression and was emotionally unstable, which made sense as to why,
"Oppenheimer took some chemicals from the laboratory and tried to poison his tutor" (Gladwell 98).
The first instance is that any person is going to go to jail for any crime he or she did, no matter who
they are or what reputation they hold. But for this case, Oppenheimer was taken out the hot seat and
was not punished. I believe he was let out of the situation way too easily and it was odd for them to
do. Gladwell here covers every detail of Oppenheimer's case, making it to the university and how
they handled it, "Blackett, luckily, found out that something was amiss. The university was
informed. Oppenheimer was called on the carpet. And what happened next is every bit as
unbelievable as the crime itself. Here is how the incident is described in American Prometheus, Kai
Bird and Martin Sherwin's biography of Oppenheimer: "After protracted negotiations, it was

Albert Einstein And The Atomic Bomb
In the afternoon of August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima no longer resembled the bustling urban
area it was just a few short hours before. At a quarter after eight in the morning, an atomic bomb fell
from the sky. A bomb small enough to carry on a plane was powerful enough to destroy five square
miles of city (¨Manhattan Project¨ par. 10). John Hersey writes in Hiroshima about what a priest saw
just after the bomb exploded two miles away from him. A priest saw clouds of smoke rising from
fires that started after the explosion (Hersey 18). Creating the atomic bomb which caused so much
destruction was a process which involved many people. Leo Szilard, Albert Einstein, and Julius
Oppenheimer were men whose work brought the beginning to the project. Every good idea needs a
kick to it, something that stands out for people to notice and look deeper. That kick was Albert
Einstein, who was important to the science of atoms before the Manhattan project began
(¨Mainwood¨ par.1). His knowledge of atoms were key to how the atomic bomb works only up to a
certain point before he couldn't do anything else. Despite his area of study, Einstein was not an
atomic scientist (¨Mainwood¨ par. 2). He was not involved with the Manhattan project at all, he
never worked a day with Szilard or Oppenheimer, their area of science was different than his. The
thing that he did most important for the Manhattan project was signing a piece of paper prompting
the need for atomic weapons to be used in

The Manhattan Project Lifesaver Or Life Destroyer Essay
The Manhattan Project Lifesaver or Life Destroyer Going throughout history and the mistakes we
have made throughout, you would think back and say if we did the right thing or if we have made a
huge mistake. In this case it is the Manhattan Project. This project was first time the atomic bomb
was introduced. It was led by General Leslie Groves and the research was directed by American
scientist J. Robert Oppenheimer. Most of the people who worked on this project were not told what
they were working on, but only told what to do. In this case, was it right to lie to the people working
on this project, was it necessary not to tell the U.S. community, and was it necessary to bomb
Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The Manhattan Project was necessary for certain things, but not all. As
human beings, we tend to lie to people. Whether it be to your parents, friends, or school teachers. It
is just a thing we do to keep ourselves from getting in trouble. When working on the Manhattan
Project, certain people were not told what the project is. Others were told but were not allowed to
tell anyone else. This was because they did not want the US community to know. They didn't know
what type of response they would get. If you put yourself in one of the workers shoes and then
realized what you have been working on, you would feel so bad because you created a weapon of
Lazaro 2
destruction. Not only that but you also took part in a project that killed millions. This is how most
people felt

Success By Malcolm Gladwell
In society, there is a common misconception that success simply arises from a combination of an
individual 's innate talent and drive to acquire success. However, in the book Outliers–The Story of
Success by Malcolm Gladwell, Gladwell introduces a new and different perspective of the
foundation of success, and proposes that other factors contribute to and can even determine the
likelihood of someone succeeding. Aspects such as hidden advantages, upbringing, timing, and
cultural legacies play a significant role in how well one will do in this world. The outliers of society
are the individuals who, because of their chance opportunities, have cultivated their inner talents and
abilities to become successful.
Hidden advantages play a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As Gladwell dives deeper into the success stories of notable figures, their stories all share a common
theme that "their success was not just of their own making" (67) but was "a product of the world in
which they grew up in."(67) The special opportunities hidden in their lives allowed them to achieve
the 10,000 hours needed to master their craft, one of Gladwell's essential components for the recipe
to success. Bill Gates, a distinguished figure in the software world serves as a prime example as a
beneficiary of the hidden advantages received that launched him into a path to success. Bill Gates'
"sheer brilliance and ambition and guts" (50) were not the only reasons for his success. Gates'
success is owed to his opportunity to "do real–time programming as an eighth grader in 1968" (51),
essentially setting him up to become successful, as others did not have the same opportunities as he
did. If Bill Joy had not had "an extraordinary, early opportunity to learn programming"(51) and the
Beatles had not had the opportunity to perform "for 270 nights on just over a year and a half" (50),
would they have become just as successful? Through these cases, Gladwell makes it evident that the
role of chance opportunities is significant and vital to the likelihood of one becoming successful.
An individual's chance of success is predetermined by their family background and upbringing. As
Gladwell investigates those who were successful and those

George Orwell 's ' The Great Gatsby '
Introduction: January 1882, eleven men, though one still a boy, set sail across the Atlantic Ocean in
search of a better life. After reaching port in New York City, spending their first night in a tavern,
and numberless other difficulties over the course next year these men send notice to the rest of their
town of the wonders of America. With the arrival of more and more Rosetans the group began to
buy develop land until they built a town. They named it Roseto after their former town which
showed surprising prosperity. Roseto would have gone largely unnoticed if not for one man, Stewart
Wolf. Wolf a physician from Oklahoma told of low heart disease in Roseto decided to investigate.
What he found was shocking, "In Roseto, no one under ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example of the twenty one players of the national Junior Soccer team of Czechoslovakia fifteen
of them were born between January first and March thirtieth, four between the months of April first
and June thirtieth, and only two between the months that follow none after September. With similar
patterns occur in the sports of Baseball and Hockey. One may ask what is the significance of these
early birthdays and sporting success. One would have two trace back to the beginning of one's
sporting carrier to discover the answer. The typical cut off for age groups in sporting leagues is
January first. Children playing sports with birthdays closer to the first typically do better due to
maturity. This slight advantage leads them to getting better training and coaching and ultimately
giving them a bigger advantage. This advantage grows until the later birthdays simply cannot keep
up. The early birthdays grow up to become All Stars while the later birthdays are left in the dust.
This multiple sport scenario unequivocally proves success is not determined by personal qualities
but by small advantages that grow into large ones. 3. In an early 1990's experiment psychologists K.
Anders Ericsson separated a school of violinists into three groups. Good students who had talent on
the violin but would not have any carrier in it, Better who had somewhat better skills than the good
class, and

Franklin D. Roosevelt: An Influential Man
Many people believe that people who were born and lived between 1927 and 1945 are the greatest
generation. This generation had to face war, tragedy, and hardships that had not been seen since the
American Civil War. There was hundreds of thousands of people that stood up and fought for the
freedom of others but some people stand out more than others such as Winston Churchill who was
the prime minister of England. He was also knighted in 1953 by Queen Elizabeth II for all of the
things he had done for England. Franklin D. Roosevelt who was the 32nd president of the United
States. He served as president from 1933 to 1945. He not only ended the great depression but also
brought the american public through World War II. As well as J. Robert Oppenheimer ... Show more
Winston Churchill was a extremely influential man with amazing speaking skills that helped him
push parliament to act against Hitler instead of following a policy of appeasement. The speeches he
gave to parliament also won him the position of Prime Minister in 1940. Churchill was also
experienced in the military, which gave him a higher understanding of war tactics and statistics.
These skills helped him better understand Hitler's war tactics and defend Britain against his
unending assault on London. He joined the military in 1893 after 2 failed attempts at the entrance
exam for the military, he was finally accepted to the British Army Cavalry division on his 3 attempt.
After a short time in the military with time served in India and Sudan he became a member of
parliament ("The Young Churchill"). He was then elected to the prime minister's cabinet as president
of the board of trade.He then did many different jobs in parliament until World War II, when he
fought against the appeasement of Hitler and was eventually elected to Prime Minister in 1940.
When the United States joined the war in 1941 he worked closely with President Roosevelt to take
back countries occupied by Germany. Together, along with the help of Russia they succeeded in
taking back Europe and defeating Hitler in 1945 ("Winston Churchill"). With all of his accomplishes
and skills it is easy to see how Winston Churchill was a great man and a member of the "Greatest

World War II: The Manhattan Project (MED)
The Manhattan Engineer District (MED), commonly known as the Manhattan Project, was "an
Anglo–American bomb project during World War II" ("Manhattan Project" [Greenwood
Encyclopedia of International Relations]). The project was formed and given its code name in 1942.
The bombing of Pearl Harbor by the Japanese sparked the official formation of the Manhattan
Project and increased the rate of atomic research. This project created multiple weapons of mass
destruction, two of which were wielded against the Japanese. This development aided in ending
World War II ("Manhattan Project" [Salem Press]). Opinions regarding the conclusion of the project
vary. Some scholars assume that the project ended with the completion of the bombing of Hiroshima
and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of the men he summoned was J. Robert Oppenheimer, who would become one of the most
important scientists of the Manhattan Project. He was nicknamed the "Father of the Atomic Bomb"
due to his contributions to the research of nuclear weapons ("Oppenheimer, J. Robert" [The Reader's
Companion to American History]). His responsibilities included "organizing and building the main
research laboratory of the project" and researching ways to create first atomic bomb ("Oppenheimer,
J. Robert" [Science in a Contemporary World]). Seven locations would have to be set up or bought
to accomplish his goal, one of which Oppenheimer managed himself. After the project was
disbanded, he worked at the Institute of Advanced Study and sat on the council of the Atomic
Energy Commission. Even though his security clearance was revoked in 1954, he still made a
significant impact on the science behind atomic weapons ("Oppenheimer, J. Robert" [The Reader's
Companion to American History]). In 2004, the Atomic Energy Commission and Senate agreed to
honor Dr. Oppenheimer and his work (Congressional

Assignment 5.1: Course Project—Interactional Dimensions of...
Assignment 5.1: Course Project–Interactional Dimensions of Conflict
Dontay L. Fortune
Jones International University
February 7, 2015
BC465: Managing Conflict in Organizations
To begin this assignment I began to explore Theme 2 of the Jones International University database
and an EHow website to get a better understanding of the style of conflict experienced between the
Lockheed Martin Corporation and the Pentagon. I began to get a better understanding of the conflict
styles by reading Theme 2; coincidentally I looked for the specific one that I thought fit the conflict
style read in the article from the Washington Post–it just so happened to be 5 categories of conflict
styles present. Next, I focused my attention toward the article ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This was a great way to conclude that there are two forms of positioning–intentional and
unintentional. Finally, I had to go back to the article of the resulting conflict between the Lockheed–
Martin Corporation and the Pentagon to determine whether the conflict was intentional or
unintentional. It was determined that the conflict was intentional because the Lockheed–Martin
Corporation was a contractor of the Pentagon, who had received orders to refer to the L.M.C.
I read into the use of metaphors in The Washington Post article mentioned earlier and located a
statement that the Lockheed Chief Executive Robert J. Stevens said (i.e. "Increasingly, the work that
has been done in EIG has fallen under this general discussion area of a potential conflict of interest,"
said Lockheed chief executive Robert J. Stevens. "We just simply respect the fact that the
government wants to raise the standard here."). Next, I forced the idea that metaphors indicate how
we are perceiving, organizing and evaluating our experiences to help me understand metaphors in
conflict.
All three of the mentioned interactional dimension–conflict styles, positioning, and metaphors are
relevant in my conflict. When it comes to conflicting styles between the Pentagon and the
Lockheed–Martin Corporation the conflict was one of compromise because business

The Lost Worlds Of Flaherty Summary
As a young boy in Michigan, Flaherty spent little time in school and more time living a nomadic,
frontier life with his father, a mining engineer. His family soon moved to Canada and he soon found
himself prospecting for gold and iron ore from camp to camp and during this series of expeditions,
Flaherty learned to survive in the wilderness from the miners and the local Inuit ("The Lost Worlds
of Flaherty").
After a second expedition to the Hudson Bay area, upon the suggestion of his boss, Sir William
Mackenzie, Flaherty bought a Bell and Howell 16 mm film camera and decided to make a visual
record of the extraordinary lives and customs he witnessed in the Canadian north ("The Lost Worlds
of Flaherty"). Flaherty mentions in the preface of Nanook of the North that when he was not
seriously engaged in exploratory work, he would compile films of the Eskimos living with him
("The Lost Worlds of Flaherty"). He also notes that he has no prior experience in filming.
Considering the quality of Nanook, I find this particularly remarkable. That said, Flaherty's first
efforts to make his visual record of the desolate Canadian north were wasted due to the film catching
fire just as Flaherty finished editing it. Flaherty went north again, for the sole purpose of making a
film, and this ultimately led to the making of Nanook of the North, which is essentially a typified,
romanticized version of a young Inuk man and his family's life and struggles ("The Lost Worlds of
Flaherty").
Even though some parts of his documentaries were staged, I believe Flaherty staged some of the
events in his documentaries to present a more compelling story, and not necessarily to deceive the
viewers or portray a skewed depiction of the subject. Also, given the technology at that time,
Flaherty might have staged some scenes in his documentaries for practicality purposes. I don't think
anyone would want to waste film just filming mundane everyday activities, given that film is
expensive and hard to come by during the time. I believe Flaherty staged some scenes to create a
structure for his documentaries. He did it to make the audience relate to his work more. That said,
Flaherty was still a man of his time and he definitely did not see his

Analysis Of Outliers By Malcolm Gladwell
Growing up in a world where fake news and irrational arguments can be considered a daily
occurrence, one could read Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell with a skeptical eye. Readers may try to
pick out details that have been used as gimmicks to hook readers into buying it. However, once
readers move past these thoughts, they can find that the ideology that Gladwell uses to describe
what makes a person successful to be reasonable and worthwhile. He states in his introduction,
"They had to appreciate the idea that the values of the world we inhabit and the people we surround
ourselves with have a profound effect on who we are," (Gladwell, 10–11). This analogy makes
perfect sense if you have the mindset that success isn't something that always relies on hard work,
but the resources and opportunities that are given to someone willing to change their life for the
better. Therefore, after analyzing this book, it is clear to readers that Gladwell is saying that success
is something that is caused by many uncontrollable factors that we nowadays brush off as luck and
grit.
One such factor that is constantly pointed out in Gladwell's book is what home lives these successful
people were subjected to as children.
An example of one of these persons is Chris Langan, he grew up in a home that was constantly in
poverty and had no good role models in his family to look up to and learn from. Nevertheless, he
had a very high IQ that would make others consider him to be a genius. Compared to him in
Gladwell's book is Robert Oppenheimer, who had a similar IQ to Chris but was raised in a better
household where he learned many social skills, to the point where could talk himself out of almost
poisoning his tutor. This difference in childhood's' is the deciding factor for one to become
successful and the other to be considered a nobody, as Gladwell writes about his analysis of Chris'
life, he pulls research from a social experiment conducted by Annette Lareau. As a sociologist, she
decided to research how the parenting styles in twelve different families of varying social classes
could affect the children they raised. During the tests, she notes, "The heavily scheduled middle–
class child is exposed to a constantly shifting set of

The Atomic Bomb Was Built During Ww2
The atomic bomb was built during ww2 and was a major factor in winning the war against the
japanese. Germany began to develop the atomic bomb and roosevelt caught wind of this and he put
a group of scientist together to develop the atomic bomb before the germans developed it. Einstein
found proof that the germans were going to use uranium to build the atomic bomb "I understand that
Germany has actually stopped the sale of uranium from the Czechoslovakian mines, which she has
taken over"(Einstein).Soon a letter from albert einstein after hearing about the germans trying to
build a bomb said that "through the work of Joliot in france as well as fermi and szilard in
america–– that it may be possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction in a large mass of uranium"
(Einstein). After a while of working on the first atomic bomb it was finally made and codenamed
"Gadget" and tested in the mexico desert on a unpopulated landscape. The development of the
atomic was made a secret by roosevelt and the name of the project for the development of the
nuclear bomb was called the manhattan project .
In the manhattan project two scientists helped in the development of the next two atomic bombs
which were enrico fermi and robert j oppenheimer . In the letter from einstein enrico fermi found out
how to make a nuclear chain reaction and it was the major factor in the
Tocmo 2
developing of the atomic bomb and enrico fermi " he recreated many of his experiments with Niels
Bohr, the

J. Robert Oppenheimer: Father Of The Nuclear Bomb
J. Robert Oppenheimer was a Theoretical Physicists who can either be considered a genius, a hero,
or a monster. He was in a lot of controversy that he never wished for. This is because he was the
inventor of the Nuclear Bomb (Or at least he was the leader of the Manhattan project and is viewed
as the father of the nuclear bomb). J. Robert Oppenheimer can be viewed as a hero and/or villain
because he helped create the nuclear bomb, and received mixed opinions for his actions at the time,
with mixed opinions upon his actions.
J. Robert Oppenheimer was involved in a lot of things involving the Nuclear bomb. He was the
leader of the Manhattan Project, the development of the first nuclear bomb during World War II. He
abandoned everything just for this bomb, even though Hitler didn't have ahad no large scale bomb
project(they didn't know this at the time). After the questioning of him and his relations with the
Communist party, others questioned whether he should have a security clearance. This made other
scientists outraged on how they treated Oppenheimer. After they made the nuclear bomb Harry
Truman ordered that they bomb Japan. After the order was carried out, it lead to Japan's surrender.
After the events of the Manhattan project the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Robert Oppenheimer was appraised for his actions. After all, he did give a major advantage over
Germany and Japan. However, he had to get blood on his hands to do it. Quoted from Peace
Magazine, " there was quite a bit in the media about Einstein, but so far as books go it was the Year
of Oppenheimer, with four new ones coming off the press.". In the Beatification of J. Robert
Oppenheimer, it states that he was a hero, '"but gradually became an anti hero'". Some, however,
looked down upon his actions, like Einstein. Einstein stated that he had a love for the government,
yet they didn't have the same feelings for him. Also when they parted ways Einstein told his
assistant "There goes a fool"(Peace

The Characteristic Success In Outliers By Malcolm Gladwell
In the book Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell says extraordinary success is not about how hard a person
works, but it is really the "hidden advantages and extraordinary opportunities and cultural legacies"
(Gladwell 19). While a person's background and opportunities are important in a person's success, it
is not until a person chooses to take advantage of the opportunities they have been given can they
truly become successful. Many groups that Gladwell mentions in Outliers such as Ted Friedman, the
Beatles, and Robert Oppenheimer became achieved all their accomplishments because they took
advantage of the opportunities they were given.
[Ted Friedman was a Jewish litigator from New York. He succeeded because he took advantage of
the demographic luck presented to him.] Ted Friedman was able to go to one of the best schools at
that time, University of Michigan, because "he happened to come along at a time in America when if
you were willing to work hard, you could take responsibility for yourself and put yourself through
school," (Gladwell 137). Even though Ted Friedman's family was poor during the time he was trying
to go to college, he did not just accept going to the free City College if he would rather be at the
University of Michigan. This inspired him to get a job to pay for college, and he was able to since he
was born during a 'demographic trough' so many places were looking for hardworking people like
Ted Friedman. Ted Friedman could have just gone to the free college and

How Did Robert Oppenheimer Change The World
J. Robert Oppenheimer, a jewish scientist that created the nuclear bomb, was seen as both a positive
and negative influence on the world. Oppenheimer helped change the world during the Manhatten
Project and after. Being the "Father of the Atomic Bomb" Oppenheimer gained many enemies.
People did not like that he opposed the hydrogen bomb and gained cultural power. J. Robert
Oppenheimer may have had both positive and negative influences on the world.
The Manhattan Project was a project set up by the government to create a new weapon during. At
the time it was very secret as Franklin Roosevelt had previously said in a letter., "I have recently
reviewed with Dr. Bush the highly important and secret program of research." (Library of
Congress). Oppenheimer was the main scientist that was hired during this time. He was hired to
build an atomic bomb. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He did not invent the atomic bomb but helped in making it reality. After being a physicist his whole
life he was chosen to help create a weapon. The government picked him because of "his many
scientific achievements." (Institute of Advancements). He worked with Albert Einstein and some
other scientist to figure out how to create the bomb. He was the guide to the people and helped them
assemble the bomb.
J. Robert Oppenheimer's bomb was something that nobody had ever built before. It was an atomic
bomb. Unlike the hydrogen bomb they used a uranium atom to make an explosion. It was more
powerful than the hydrogen bomb and was able to be mass produced. They had accomplished their
goal to create a weapon.
At the end of the Manhattan Project the U.S. dropped a bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. After
Oppenheimer saw what damage the bomb could do he argued that they should not produce it. The
bomb killed and destroyed more than anyone expected. The government did not stop they continued
to use the bombs to

J. Robert Oppenhimer 's Leadership Essay
J. Robert Oppenhimer's leadership was critical in the United States' creation of the atomic bomb.
The name J. Robert Oppenheimer is inextricably coupled with the Manhattan Project. Was
Oppenheimer immoral in his role as overseer of the project which sought to create weapon of mass
destruction? We shall consider evidence from Oppenheimer's life, as well as the historical context
surrounding Oppenheimer's decision, and contrast similar decisions made by scientists in
comparable scenarios.
J. Robert Oppenheimer was born to an upper–middle class Jewish family on 22 April, 1904. Ill
health as a child and protective parents prevented him from making many friends. Instead,
Oppenheimer was devoted to academic pursuits, and was admitted to Harvard at age 18. Before
attending university, he took a year in New Mexico to recover from illness; his love of the desert
later influenced his decision to headquarter the Manhattan Project in Los Alamos. At Harvard,
Oppenheimer excelled as a chemistry major, graduating summa cum laude in 3 years, and his
interests began to trend toward physics (Pais 8–9).
In September 1925, Oppenheimer was accepted to Christ College, Cambridge University, where he
studied under the famous physicist J.J. Thompson. Upon completion of his Ph.D. in only 2 years,
Oppenheimer was invited to Gottingen to work with Max Born. During this time he experienced
nervous breakdowns, including attempting to strangle a friend and colleague, poisoning an apple
intending

The Manhattan Project Led By J. Robert Oppenheimer
The Manhattan Project led by J. Robert Oppenheimer was the sole responsibility of the most
destructive, but a most productive exploration of energy in the history of man– producing the atomic
bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, arguably started the war–like encounter, the cold
war, sparking conflicts and bills that would affect future for centuries to come, and starting a nuclear
arms race between the United States and Russia. Firstly, with substantiation from the many lives
claimed by the atomic bombs, was this an instance in which the US had to explore a lot of bad, to do
a lot of good, or was this an encounter of pure human evil? Moreover, because of the further
conflicts that did quite a huge number onto humanity, it's a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Nuclear fallout shelters designed in almost every house in America due to the fact that people didn't
want to perish a horrible, fiery death– a theme seen throughout all of humanity, self preservation.
However, because of the mass amounts of exchanges of treaties throughout the world to stop a
nuclear holocaust, it is Throughout the war effort in World War Two, Robert Oppenheimer 's work
on the Manhattan project beginning in 1939 happened in secret, providing for future exploration in
the field of nuclear fission, designs for future weapons, and grounds for future scientific exploration
in reactors, with substantiation from the X–10 graphite reactor. Throughout all the vastly important
discoveries of Manhattan project, it provided a few heart wrenching lasting encounters on the world
in the form of further foreign conflict and disputes; examples including the current Iran deal, the
Cold War, and the North Korean crisis.
To touch on J. Robert Oppenheimer, it should be shown off a lot about him– he was a true genius, if
you talked to him about anything besides sports, he'd be able to talk about it. He had a somewhat
strange childhood– he was interested in physics since he was a young boy. It almost seemed like he
knew that Uranium and Plutonium were going to make bombs. He was very intelligent, and almost
always dressed like the stereotypical man at the time–

The Life Of Ivan Denisovich By Alexander Solzhenitsyn
World War 2 not only had terrible battles where many people were killed, but had many other acts of
brutalization. People who were deemed to be outsiders were brutalized for political beliefs, race,
religion and many other reasons. Most of these reasons seem illogical and a lot of people wonder
how someone can be brutalized because they look different or think differently. The most famous
example where outsiders were brutalized is the Holocaust in Germany, but there are many other
examples. Outsiders were even brutalized before in the United States. There are many different
accounts of brutalization throughout World War 2 and after World War 2. One Day in the Life of
Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn is one piece of literature that portrays what life in the
Gulag system was life through the eyes of Ivan Denisovich. The film Stalingrad shows the
brutalization of the Russian soldiers by the German soldiers. The play In the Matter of J. Robert
Oppenheimer by Heiner Kipphardt shows the brutalization of people with communist views or
pasts. All three of these works portray how groups that are brutalized are viewed as outsiders. These
works are important because they document what happened to these "outsider" and how they were
brutalized. In the novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, the main character describes how
brutal the Gulag system is for the zeks by describing one day where he wasn't feeling very well. He
didn't get out of bed immediately to go to work

J. Robert Oppenheimer: The Father Of The Atomic Bomb
J. Robert Oppenheimer was an excellent physicist and recognized as the" Father of the Atomic
Bomb." A charismatic leader of defects that were trivial and unusual great qualities, Oppenheimer
introduced a unique sensibility to authority's science, and study, education. He opposed the concept
of stockpiling weapons and was considered a security threat. Oppenheimer's politics collided in the
1940 and existence shows the struggle between warfare, scientific discipline. His case became a
reason "celebre" in the area of science due to the consequences concerning political and ethical
dilemmas regarding the function of scientists in government. After help constructing the atomic
bomb among the Manhattan Project, he was forbidden from the U.S. Government during the
McCarthy Trials.
The son of German immigrants, Oppenheimer, who'd made their fortune in fabrics, had the
resources accessible his family to help his schooling at a youthful age. At age ten he was brought
some rocks by Oppenheimer's grandpa; as a result, Oppenheimer became enthusiastic about
geology; This led him to examine other sciences in a youthful age. He could talk well and ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His approach to instruction was quite hard, and many students failed his courses. However, they
were nevertheless taken by them and in the end handed them. He became friends that have many
communists as an outcome with this and sided in their civil war with Spain. Frank, strangely
enough, his buddy turned out to be a communist. Oppenheimer structured anti–Fascist companies
and was a communist that was recognized but was the party formally joined don't. Do to oppression
and Stalin sway in Russian Federation, Oppenheimer removed his help that was the communist. In
1939 Harrison was led by Oppenheimer. They had one woman, one boy, and two

The Manhattan Project Essay
The Manhattan Project was a very important event throughout the World War II history. It began the
development of the atomic bomb and other nuclear weapons that were of good help during the war.
It first began with a German scientist separating the uranium atom, which made people be scared of
what Hitler might be capable of. Also Hitler and his people had begun discovering new types of
weapons that were useful for them in the war. Something that apparently Hitler did not quite think
about, was the persecution of Jewish scientists such as Albert Einstein, who could very well use his
abilities against Hitler. Albert Einstein was a Jewish refugee in the United States. Another very
important scientist, although not Jewish, was Enrico Fermi, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
On July of 1945, J Robert Oppenheimer tests the first bomb at Trinity State, near Alamogordo, New
Mexico. All the scientists readied themselves to watch the detonation of this atomic bomb which
stood on top of a tower. Once exploded, there was a blinding flash which could be seen from 200
miles away. It also grew up to 40,000 feet and damaged some of the homes near it that were 100
miles away. After this explosion President Truman, all the way from Postdam, Germany, declares
that the project was successful. Later on we see how there were more bombings being made, not
only this one at Trinity State. The United States was trying to make Japan surrender but they denied
it. Because of this the United States developed a new bomb named little boy which was detonated in
Hiroshima, Japan. On August 6, 1945 it exploded with an altitude of 1,750 feet. Over 69% of
Hiroshima's buildings were destroyed and about 7% damaged. About 80,000 (or about 30%) of the
people in Hiroshima were killed instantly and another 70,000 were injured. After this occurring,
Japan still didn't want to surrender which caused the United States to develop another bomb. In
August 9, 1945, the next bomb named Fat Man took place at Nagasaki, Japan. This attack destroyed
about 44% of the city, killed about 35,000 people and about 60,000 were injured. Emperor Hirohito
from Japan had enough of these bomb attacks and finally decided to surrender. He was already

Biography Of Julius Robert Oppenheimer, An Artist And...
Julius Robert Oppenheimer was born April 22, 1904 to Ella Friedman, an artist and Julius
Oppenheimer, a wealthy German textile merchant in New York City, New York. As a child Robert
was interested in geology and was said to have even contacted locally famous geologist to discuss
the rock formations he observed in Central Park. At the age of 17 Oppenheimer began attending
Harvard, a prestigious and well known private University. He graduated Harvard with a major in
Chemistry in May of 1925. Later that year he enrolled at Cambridge University in England to study
physics thus beginning his atomic research in the Cavendish Laboratory under J.J. Thomson.
Then at the age of 22 he was invited to team up with Max Born at Gottingen University in Germany.
There he developed the Born–Oppenheimer Method. This method was an important addition to the
Quantum Molecular Theory. Quantum theory is the origin of modern physics that explains the
behavior and nature of matter and energy on the atomic and subatomic plane. He left Gottingen in
1927 with his PhD and a mark in the world of Quantum theory and Theoretical physics. A year later
Robert began as an associate professor at Berkley while having a joint appointment at the California
Institute of Technology, commuting between the two for the next 13 years. While at Berkley
Oppenheimer was the first to write papers of the astronomical examination of collapsed stars, a
phenomenon we know now as black holes 30 years before anyone else. He also

Analysis Of An Extraordinary Pair
"General Groves is the biggest S.O.B I have ever worked for." (Colonel Kenneth D. Nicholas, 121).
General Groves is a man that is neutral and does not take no for an answer. Groves' behavior such
as, the way he treats others, holding all authority and responsibility, as well as the way he presents
himself points to him being a successful autocratic leader. Autocratic leadership is a style where
everything is centered on the boss meaning that they make decisions without consulting others and
have little flexibility. He has exhibited little flexibility this throughout all the readings in An
Extraordinary Pair by having high expectations of those around him. "He abounds with energy and
expects everyone to work as hard or even harder, than he does..." (Colonel Kenneth D. Nicholas,
121). There have been multiple accounts of Groves' emotional neutrality. Emotional Neutrality s the
concept of removing emotions from decisions. At the beginning of An Extraordinary Pair both
Groves and Oppenheimer were characterized as people who "...overcame personal differences to
achieve their common purpose." (109). Groves himself has addressed his neutrality by stating "My
emotional graph is a straight line..." (General Groves, Robert DeVore 119). This idea of having a
lack of emotion has allowed Groves to not be surprised nor elated by the continued success of the
project. The general opinion about Groves is that people saw him as a highly intelligent individual
as well as someone who would not go

The Creation of the Worlds Deadliest Bomb Essays
The Creation of the Worlds Deadliest Bomb
The research for a weapon which could end the world's most devastating war World War II started
almost immediately after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor got sneak attacked by Japan
which entered the United States to the allied side of World War II. In 1938 some german scientists
discovered that if you bombard Uranium with neutrons you could split the Nucleus of an atom.
When the war started scientists thought about military uses of this new discovery. When the atoms
split it releases energy and if you put billions of these atoms together it could start a chain reaction
and make a massive explosion. Three physicists leo Szilard, Eugene Wigner, and Edward Teller,
believed that a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also as a bonus for leading the Manhattan Project he was promoted to Brigadier General. His last
project was building the Pentagon where he spent the whole budget of the Manhattan Project two
million dollars in one week and also the Manhattan Project and Pentagon were completely different
projects. Groves was a powerful leader and was able to make quick decisions which other people
have spent weeks on. He would do anything to get the job done and along with his confidence he
was unstoppable. A lot of people hated him because he was mean and ruthless but they had a respect
for him because he was able to get things done better than anybody else. He was also extremely
suspicious and distrustful of anybody which was necessary for the project to be successful. Groves
was a great engineer but he was not a scientist especially a scientist who could build an atomic
bomb. Therefore he needed a well respected scientist to lead and supervise the scientific side of the
Manhattan Project while Groves was taking care of the rest like housing and security. This person
would have nearly the same authority and power of Groves. Groves started searching for scientist
who could lead the science side of the creation of the atomic bomb. Groves could take care of the
engineering and mechanical parts of the project such as the factories but he did not know how to
supervise the scientists. He began the search for a

Assumptions About Documentaries and an Analysis of The...
Assumption about documentaries being true, educational only, no imagination needed aren't correct .
There are several documentaries we watched in class that show that documentaries don't all fall
under the same assumptions. A common assumption about documentaries is that there is no
imagination needed. " In a time when the major media recycle the same stories on the same subjects
over and over, when they risk little in formal innovation, when they remain beholden to powerful
sponsors with their own political agendas and restrictive demands, it is the independent
documentary film that has brought a fresh eye to the events of the world and told stories, with verve
and imagination, that broaden limited horizons and awaken new ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Even though they are real people we weren't really seeing who they are.
A documentary film is not made up; it shows what really happens in real life; shows things as they
are naturally are. This statement is not completely true. "The story a documentary tells stems from
the historical world but it is still told from the filmmaker's perspective and in the filmmaker's voice.
This is a matter of degree, not a black–and–white division." (Nichols, 12) "In these cases the stories
told speak about the actual events directly, not allegorically, and the film adheres to the known
historical facts. Social actors, people, present themselves in fluid, negotiated, revealing ways."
(Nichols,12) According to Nichols documentaries are true events but the filmmaker shapes what we
see into what they want us to see. We are getting the perspective of the directors. An example of
movie watched in class was Nanook of the North, even though the people were real, some of the
scenes seemed staged. The director wants us to see Nanook and his people behind on technology
and still living in the past. There is the scene were one of them is biting a disc, it seems the director
is trying to make us believe these people are way behind and primitive. Another scene that helps
prove that not everything caught on camera happens naturally is when Nanook sees all the other
eskimos going

The Play Oppenheimer Follows The Story Of J Robert...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to The Play Oppenheimer Follows The Story Of J Robert...

Similar to The Play Oppenheimer Follows The Story Of J Robert... (7)

More from Samantha Randall

More from Samantha Randall (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Play Oppenheimer Follows The Story Of J Robert...