Using Ecological Utility to Define
Native Plants
Clean Air
Clean Water
Open Space
Walk more
Tinker less
ABSTRACT - One of the least understood concepts in
phytoecology is ecological utility in relationship to the
definition of a native plant. Presently, native plants
are domesticated, hybridized and otherwise altered
without thought to the destruction this tampering
does to ecological utility and hence ecosystems. By
altering the chemical, physical and phenological
properties of native plants, “scientists” intent on
“saving”, “improving” or commercializing these plants
are creating non-native plants which can drive
dependent species to extinction. The resultant
cascade through an ecosystem can be catastrophic.
the
relationship
between an
individual organism
and another individual
organism
(single flower/single pollinator).
the relationships between individual
species to each other
(single flower species/single pollinator species)
the relationships between groups of organisms in an
ecosystem such as pollinators and flowers
the relationships of all the organisms in a ecosystem to each other
the relationships of organisms in one ecosystem to those in another ecosystem
Hierarchy of mutualistic ecological relationships
The relationship in the first level of the pyramid,
between an individual organism and another
individual organism
(single flower/single pollinator)
is the most important and defines the rest of the
relationships in the pyramid.
Altering this relationship
alters every relationship in the
pyramid.
This leads to a very important question we need
to answer in phytoecology - the difference
between a native plant and a non-native plant.
In Invasive Plant Ecology we have the Enemy Release
Hypothesis.
In part, this states that an overwhelming number of
native organisms cannot use non-native plants
because they did not coevolve together.
By changing the genetic structure of a native plant
through domestication or hybridization with
another species in hopes of “improving” the plant
or making it resistant to diseases or pests is
doomed to be an ecological failure because of the
reduced number of native organisms using the
altered native plant due the unnaturally rapid
changes in the physical, chemical and temporal
properties of the plant.
Therefore, domesticating or hybridizing a native
plant, with another native or especially a non-
native, creates a non-native plant of reduced
ecological utility.
These common ornamental “native wildflowers” have been or are in
the process of becoming domesticated.
Are they still native plants?
There are three types of plants we need to
define when thinking about ecological utility:
1.) native plants
2.) domesticated plants/native crops*
3.) non-native plants
*Native crops are domesticated native plants.
A native plant in the Americas is any plant which
precedes European, African or Asian contact
that is not:
1. domesticated,
2. hybridized with another species or
3. otherwise (directly) changed by
human mediation.
Examples of native crops:
An important question: Does a plantation or forest
of native trees such as Pinus strobus and Quercus
rubra which are important for timber and selected
to maximize this trait change their status from a
native plant to a domesticated plant/crop?
Lycopodium dendroideum (ground pine) is
commonly used in Christmas decorations such as
wreathes.
Medeola virginiana, Indian cucumber-root, and
Asarum canadense, wild ginger, are food and
ornamental plants found near my home.
Are these native plants or domesticated plants?
Or is it more situational?
My delineation between a native plant and a
domesticated plant is the point at which a plant is
actively cultivated because that is when extensive
culling of outlying traits begins with the resultant
severe homogenization of traits which defines
domestication.
By culling the outlying traits, the resultant
homogenization of the genome of a plant species
removes the heterogeneity which is the essential
element of ecological utility.
X
X X
X
Not only does this process limit the number of
species using a plant, it also limits the number of
individuals within a species using that plant.
The heterogeneity in an organism
utilized must match the heterogeneity in
the species using it.
In other words, we do not want to create non-
native plants because it destroys their ecological
utility in multiple ways such as a food source for
pollinators, a food for larvae, their utility for
decomposers and organisms that depend on this
relationship, their functionality with soil fungi,
their competitiveness, their phenological traits
and a long list of other potential negative
impacts.
Only some native generalist organisms, whether
they are insects, mammals, birds, reptiles,
amphibians, fungi, protozoa, bacteria or even
other plants can utilize these new non-native
plants.
This means the extinction of many native
specialist organisms and their interrelationships
with other organisms in a cascade from the
highest to the lowest ecological levels.
Another way of stating this is that:
Wild organisms, such as pollinators, within a
species and between species have genetic
variability in size, shape, maturity rates, growth
rates, food preferences, habitat preferences and
their ability to use different individuals within
the same species of a plant population.
The differences may appear small to us, but can
be large in the local ecology.
A great example is the misguided work being
done by the American Chestnut Foundation on
the American chestnut, Castanea dentata.
In the following photos note the difference
in
1. the shape of the leaves,
2. their albedo (reflectance/shininess),
3. thickness and
4. texture.
Native American chestnut near the Appalachian Trail in a PA Game
Commission State Game Land SGL 110 “north” of Rt. 183.
Native American chestnut near the Appalachian Trail in a PA Game
Commission State Game Land SGL 110 “north” of Rt. 183.
Native American chestnut along the Appalachian Trail near the
Hamburg Reservoir.
Native American chestnut near the Appalachian Trail in a PA Game
Commission State Game Land SGL 110 “south” of Rt. 183.
Hybridized chestnut near the Appalachian Trail in a PA Game
Commission State Game Land SGL 217 near the Allentown Shelter.
Hybridized chestnut near the Appalachian Trail in a PA Game
Commission State Game Land SGL 110 near the Auburn Overlook.
Hybridized chestnut near the Appalachian Trail on the edge of a private
yard down the north side of Blue Mountain from the Eagles Nest
Shelter.
Hybridized chestnut near the Appalachian Trail in a PA Game
Commission State Game Land SGL 217 near the Allentown Shelter.
4/4/2017 - 10 out of 20 C. dentata seeds stored in refrigerator last fall had
germinated.
Another example
These photos are examples of color heterogeneity
within a wild azalea species, Rhododendron
periclymenoides, found within 100 yards of each other
near home in Berks County, PA, on May 19, 2016.
A commercial grower of this plant would quickly
make cultivars of each color and sell them as
separate lineages under different names such as
Puberty Pink and Blue Ridge White.
The further from wild stock a native plant
becomes the less ecological utility it has because
we naturally and naively collect propagules
(seeds) from what appear to us to be the best
looking and most uniform plants within a defined
time window.
Stated again, limiting the phenotypic and
phenological diversity of resource plants by
reducing the sources of genetic material limits
the number of species and individuals within
those species which can utilize a particular plant
species.
Additionally, plants which do well in cultivation
often lose the robustness and other traits
necessary to survive in changing wild and semi-
wild conditions.
Cultivars, especially those from cuttings,
because of their lack of genetic variability have
lost most of their ecological utility in addition to
creating plants which are more vulnerable to
being destroyed by a single event such as a
pathogen, herbivore infestation or change in
weather.
Simply put:
No matter how successful a hybrid or cultivar of a
native plant appears to be it is an ecological failure
because the genetic alterations decrease or destroy
its ecological utility.
“The operation was a success, but the patient died.”
Summary
Example of a domesticated flower. The lack of different
sizes, colors and shapes has very little ecological utility
because it attracts few species and may be useful to few
members within the species it attracts.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
This is an example of what domestication of a wild plant does to
its physical properties and the organisms using it. The same can
be assumed for chemical properties.
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X X X XX XXX X
Example of what happens temporally when a plant is domesticated:
the phenological traits change. The number of species and members
within a species utilizing the plant are reduced due to the reduced
time the plant or a trait of the plant such as bloom time is available.
June July August
What we want in a plant species is heterogeneity in size, shape, color
and other properties to match the heterogeneity of size, shape and
other property preferences in a species and species utilizing the plant.
The ecological utility in this plant species is high because of its
heterogeneity.
What applies to a single species also applies to an ecosystem.
Anyone who wants to join me is welcome to grab a
camera, their shoes, a day pack and do so.
We live a few hours from here in northern Berks County, PA.
Richard Gardner
rtgardner3@yahoo.com
410.726.3045
http://www.slideshare.net/rtgardner3
https://independent.academia.edu/RichardTGardner
Miscellaneous
thoughts and photos
An example of ecosystem heterogeneity:
Two years ago I watched a monarch butterfly
(Danaus plexippus) migration on Blue Mountain
near home.
Of the dozens of butterflies I watched, one
preferred the white flowered Boneset (Eupatorium
perfoliatum) while all the others preferred yellow
flowered Goldenrod (Solidago) species.
A few important questions
What makes this Clymene haploa (moth) chose this flower instead of the
neighboring flower or this patch of flowers instead of others?
Why is the cluster of these Great spangled fritillary butterflies on this milkweed
plant instead of others?
What are the traits of this Solidago plant which makes it more preferable than others
nearby?
For mutualistic relationships to thrive such as
pollinators and flowering plants, native flowering
plants need heterogeneity within the species to
match the same heterogeneity within a pollinator
species and among species using it.

Using Ecological Utility to Define Native Plants NENHC 2017

  • 1.
    Using Ecological Utilityto Define Native Plants
  • 3.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    ABSTRACT - Oneof the least understood concepts in phytoecology is ecological utility in relationship to the definition of a native plant. Presently, native plants are domesticated, hybridized and otherwise altered without thought to the destruction this tampering does to ecological utility and hence ecosystems. By altering the chemical, physical and phenological properties of native plants, “scientists” intent on “saving”, “improving” or commercializing these plants are creating non-native plants which can drive dependent species to extinction. The resultant cascade through an ecosystem can be catastrophic.
  • 7.
    the relationship between an individual organism andanother individual organism (single flower/single pollinator). the relationships between individual species to each other (single flower species/single pollinator species) the relationships between groups of organisms in an ecosystem such as pollinators and flowers the relationships of all the organisms in a ecosystem to each other the relationships of organisms in one ecosystem to those in another ecosystem Hierarchy of mutualistic ecological relationships
  • 8.
    The relationship inthe first level of the pyramid, between an individual organism and another individual organism (single flower/single pollinator) is the most important and defines the rest of the relationships in the pyramid.
  • 9.
    Altering this relationship altersevery relationship in the pyramid.
  • 10.
    This leads toa very important question we need to answer in phytoecology - the difference between a native plant and a non-native plant.
  • 11.
    In Invasive PlantEcology we have the Enemy Release Hypothesis. In part, this states that an overwhelming number of native organisms cannot use non-native plants because they did not coevolve together.
  • 12.
    By changing thegenetic structure of a native plant through domestication or hybridization with another species in hopes of “improving” the plant or making it resistant to diseases or pests is doomed to be an ecological failure because of the reduced number of native organisms using the altered native plant due the unnaturally rapid changes in the physical, chemical and temporal properties of the plant.
  • 13.
    Therefore, domesticating orhybridizing a native plant, with another native or especially a non- native, creates a non-native plant of reduced ecological utility.
  • 14.
    These common ornamental“native wildflowers” have been or are in the process of becoming domesticated. Are they still native plants?
  • 15.
    There are threetypes of plants we need to define when thinking about ecological utility: 1.) native plants 2.) domesticated plants/native crops* 3.) non-native plants *Native crops are domesticated native plants.
  • 16.
    A native plantin the Americas is any plant which precedes European, African or Asian contact that is not: 1. domesticated, 2. hybridized with another species or 3. otherwise (directly) changed by human mediation.
  • 17.
  • 21.
    An important question:Does a plantation or forest of native trees such as Pinus strobus and Quercus rubra which are important for timber and selected to maximize this trait change their status from a native plant to a domesticated plant/crop?
  • 23.
    Lycopodium dendroideum (groundpine) is commonly used in Christmas decorations such as wreathes.
  • 24.
    Medeola virginiana, Indiancucumber-root, and Asarum canadense, wild ginger, are food and ornamental plants found near my home.
  • 25.
    Are these nativeplants or domesticated plants? Or is it more situational?
  • 26.
    My delineation betweena native plant and a domesticated plant is the point at which a plant is actively cultivated because that is when extensive culling of outlying traits begins with the resultant severe homogenization of traits which defines domestication.
  • 27.
    By culling theoutlying traits, the resultant homogenization of the genome of a plant species removes the heterogeneity which is the essential element of ecological utility. X X X X
  • 28.
    Not only doesthis process limit the number of species using a plant, it also limits the number of individuals within a species using that plant.
  • 29.
    The heterogeneity inan organism utilized must match the heterogeneity in the species using it.
  • 30.
    In other words,we do not want to create non- native plants because it destroys their ecological utility in multiple ways such as a food source for pollinators, a food for larvae, their utility for decomposers and organisms that depend on this relationship, their functionality with soil fungi, their competitiveness, their phenological traits and a long list of other potential negative impacts.
  • 31.
    Only some nativegeneralist organisms, whether they are insects, mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fungi, protozoa, bacteria or even other plants can utilize these new non-native plants.
  • 32.
    This means theextinction of many native specialist organisms and their interrelationships with other organisms in a cascade from the highest to the lowest ecological levels.
  • 33.
    Another way ofstating this is that: Wild organisms, such as pollinators, within a species and between species have genetic variability in size, shape, maturity rates, growth rates, food preferences, habitat preferences and their ability to use different individuals within the same species of a plant population.
  • 34.
    The differences mayappear small to us, but can be large in the local ecology.
  • 35.
    A great exampleis the misguided work being done by the American Chestnut Foundation on the American chestnut, Castanea dentata.
  • 36.
    In the followingphotos note the difference in 1. the shape of the leaves, 2. their albedo (reflectance/shininess), 3. thickness and 4. texture.
  • 37.
    Native American chestnutnear the Appalachian Trail in a PA Game Commission State Game Land SGL 110 “north” of Rt. 183.
  • 38.
    Native American chestnutnear the Appalachian Trail in a PA Game Commission State Game Land SGL 110 “north” of Rt. 183.
  • 39.
    Native American chestnutalong the Appalachian Trail near the Hamburg Reservoir.
  • 40.
    Native American chestnutnear the Appalachian Trail in a PA Game Commission State Game Land SGL 110 “south” of Rt. 183.
  • 41.
    Hybridized chestnut nearthe Appalachian Trail in a PA Game Commission State Game Land SGL 217 near the Allentown Shelter.
  • 42.
    Hybridized chestnut nearthe Appalachian Trail in a PA Game Commission State Game Land SGL 110 near the Auburn Overlook.
  • 43.
    Hybridized chestnut nearthe Appalachian Trail on the edge of a private yard down the north side of Blue Mountain from the Eagles Nest Shelter.
  • 44.
    Hybridized chestnut nearthe Appalachian Trail in a PA Game Commission State Game Land SGL 217 near the Allentown Shelter.
  • 45.
    4/4/2017 - 10out of 20 C. dentata seeds stored in refrigerator last fall had germinated.
  • 46.
  • 47.
    These photos areexamples of color heterogeneity within a wild azalea species, Rhododendron periclymenoides, found within 100 yards of each other near home in Berks County, PA, on May 19, 2016.
  • 48.
    A commercial growerof this plant would quickly make cultivars of each color and sell them as separate lineages under different names such as Puberty Pink and Blue Ridge White.
  • 49.
    The further fromwild stock a native plant becomes the less ecological utility it has because we naturally and naively collect propagules (seeds) from what appear to us to be the best looking and most uniform plants within a defined time window.
  • 50.
    Stated again, limitingthe phenotypic and phenological diversity of resource plants by reducing the sources of genetic material limits the number of species and individuals within those species which can utilize a particular plant species.
  • 51.
    Additionally, plants whichdo well in cultivation often lose the robustness and other traits necessary to survive in changing wild and semi- wild conditions.
  • 52.
    Cultivars, especially thosefrom cuttings, because of their lack of genetic variability have lost most of their ecological utility in addition to creating plants which are more vulnerable to being destroyed by a single event such as a pathogen, herbivore infestation or change in weather.
  • 53.
    Simply put: No matterhow successful a hybrid or cultivar of a native plant appears to be it is an ecological failure because the genetic alterations decrease or destroy its ecological utility. “The operation was a success, but the patient died.”
  • 54.
  • 55.
    Example of adomesticated flower. The lack of different sizes, colors and shapes has very little ecological utility because it attracts few species and may be useful to few members within the species it attracts.
  • 56.
    X X X X X X X X X This isan example of what domestication of a wild plant does to its physical properties and the organisms using it. The same can be assumed for chemical properties. X X X X X X X X
  • 57.
    X X XXX XXX X Example of what happens temporally when a plant is domesticated: the phenological traits change. The number of species and members within a species utilizing the plant are reduced due to the reduced time the plant or a trait of the plant such as bloom time is available. June July August
  • 58.
    What we wantin a plant species is heterogeneity in size, shape, color and other properties to match the heterogeneity of size, shape and other property preferences in a species and species utilizing the plant. The ecological utility in this plant species is high because of its heterogeneity.
  • 59.
    What applies toa single species also applies to an ecosystem.
  • 60.
    Anyone who wantsto join me is welcome to grab a camera, their shoes, a day pack and do so. We live a few hours from here in northern Berks County, PA.
  • 61.
  • 62.
  • 63.
    An example ofecosystem heterogeneity: Two years ago I watched a monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) migration on Blue Mountain near home. Of the dozens of butterflies I watched, one preferred the white flowered Boneset (Eupatorium perfoliatum) while all the others preferred yellow flowered Goldenrod (Solidago) species.
  • 67.
    A few importantquestions
  • 68.
    What makes thisClymene haploa (moth) chose this flower instead of the neighboring flower or this patch of flowers instead of others?
  • 69.
    Why is thecluster of these Great spangled fritillary butterflies on this milkweed plant instead of others?
  • 70.
    What are thetraits of this Solidago plant which makes it more preferable than others nearby?
  • 71.
    For mutualistic relationshipsto thrive such as pollinators and flowering plants, native flowering plants need heterogeneity within the species to match the same heterogeneity within a pollinator species and among species using it.