Imperialism And South Africa

Imperialism and South Africa
Imperialism's Effect on South Africa Imperialism was a movement that affected all parts of the
world, beginning as early as the 19th century. Wealthy and established nations would annex and take
control of underdeveloped nations and civilize them. This may sound good in theory, but
Imperialism seemed to take advantage of the so–called "inferior" nations more than truly help them.
The economic superpowers seized the land of the territories they thought to be subordinate, using it
as trading depots, an outlet to gain natural resources, and to civilize the native people. These three
factors continued to be a main staple in society of South Africa even after imperialism ended and it
was an independent nation. Racial segregation was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He claimed that the land belonged to the French, as they were a superior race of people (Ferry 2).
He exclaimed, "Gentlemen, we must speak more loudly and more honestly! We must say openly that
indeed the higher races have a right over the lower races" (Ferry 1). Ferry again went on to explain
that it was the duty of the superior people to cultivate the lives of the natives. Paton and Great
Britain also shared the same views on civilization as the French, but with more of a religious point
of view. Missionaries were sent to spread Christianity, as Paton explains, "The islands of this group
on which life and property are now comparatively safe, the 8,000 professed Christians on the group,
and all the churches formed from among them are, by God's blessing, the fruits of the labors of
British missionaries, who, at great toil, expense, and loss of life have translated, got printed, and
taught the natives to read the Bible in part or in whole in nine different languages of this group"
(Paton 2). It seemed that all of the so–called superior countries agreed upon the fact that they saw
the native people as subordinate beings. Together, these three factors of Imperialism shaped the
future of South Africa in the second half of the 20th century. Although South Africa was
fundamentally independent during this time period, there were irreversible changes made in the
mentality of the South African citizens. For instance, the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Effects Of Imperialism In Africa
From the end of 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century, saw the annexation and
colonisation of vast territories in the African continent by Europeans powers. The period was known
as New Imperialism. By the beginning of 20th century, almost 90% of the continents was under
European powers, while some other African countries managed to preserve their independence,
namely Ethiopia and Liberia. The scramble for Africa was caused by continuous rivalries between
the European powers namely Great Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Portugal and Belgium
which compete for political and economic supremacy without declaring any sort of war among
themselves. The process of consolidating power in Africa by this European powers was by military
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, the British used South Africa as a port for their ships to stop by, while on their journey
to India, which was a very important part of the British Empire. Another example was the Suez
Canal in Egypt which establish a quite short route, to enable the British to return to the United
Kingdom and administer their colonies effectively. This was the reason why the British establish
ports in some of their territories. As time change, as their ship started to use oil, the British tried to
link the Suez Canal en route to the Saudi Arabia and other parts of the Middle East which the area
near to the oilfields for oil supply for their ships. In order to secure the canal, in 1880, Britain
struggled to gain and maintain control of the Suez Canal during the First World War and also the
Second World War. This led individual Europeans and European governments to get involved in
African affairs due to its strategic locations for the purpose of trade and running the

European Imperialism In Africa
Beginning in 1881 and subsiding in 1914, Africa underwent an invasion of European power known
as Imperialism. While african territory was being occupied, divided, and colonized by larger
countries, the driving force behind European Imperialism in Africa became rather transparent. The
sizable countries sought after power and resourceful profit in which they looked to the smaller
African colonies to provide. Two of the biggest winners in the race to seize these colonies were
Britain and France, they desired a gain in technological advancements, exported African resources,
and economic growth. Technology and the development of such gave a prominent advantage to all
countries planning to occupy land in Africa. The invention of the repeating

During the 1870's Europeans started colonizing countries in Africa. Europeans did this because they
needed all of Africa's valuable resources.Africa was a big target because they were not very
modernized in technology so it was easier for the Europeans to seize control. The Europeans were
able to enter Africa through ships and scare the Africans with their guns. The Europeans controlled
Africa in two ways direct and indirect rule. Direct rule is when the country in charge rules strictly
over the country and they try to civilize the people they are ruling. For example in Algeria the
French had direct rule. The French were in Algeria and gave Algerians their needs but no rights.
Indirect ruling is when the country in charge is ruling from far ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In some parts of Africa the Europeans rule which means they ruled through government officials in
the area. Some Europeans, however, abused that power. In an article by The Golden Coast Leader
they define indirect ruling as a "System by which the political officer can drive the wedge of divide–
and–rule through any tendency on the part of the people to come together to develop political ideas"
(Document 10). Here, The Golden Coast Leader is showing how the indirect ruling system is not a
great idea because it leads to Africans being unstable in running their own government. After having
the Europeans run their country for so long the Africans of that nation most likely would not know
how to do it for themselves. The Africans have only watched others rule, so they have no experience
for themselves. Africans have no freedom in their own home, Nnamdi Azikiwe a young leader in
Nigeria's fight for independence, who later became the first president of Nigeria stated, "We demand
the right to be free to make mistakes and learn from our experience" (Document 8). Africans wanted
to be able to make decisions for themselves and even if they do not make the best choice it's okay
because they can learn from that. Imperialism took that away from them, Africans never got to
decide s for themselves. Learning from mistakes would make them grow as a nation, but the
Europeans did it

Imperialism In Africa
Imperialism is an action that involves a nation extending its power by the acquisition of inhabited
territory. This means another country taking over another less powerful country. Life can change for
the people living on each side (colonizing country and the colonized country). For the African
countries being imperialized, there are some short–term advantages. They Brought the technique of
Industrialization which improved accessibility across Africa, such as trains, and later, cars and
motorcycles. They brought new modern farming techniques. Improved mining technologies laid the
groundwork for the future economic basis of several African nations, and making them compatible
with the modern global economy. They built buildings and brought new foods, culture, and
religions. They brought new forms of education and built new schools and made laws that regulated
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Taking over Africa was a lot more challenging. If we compare we see that the big reason for South
America being taken over by European powers was the lack of technology and lack of immunity to
diseases. But the Africans were immune to the disease and had some they were already immune to
that the Europeans never heard of. Like yellow fever, malaria and sleeping sickness. All which
killed Europeans is grade numbers. Also, Nagana is a disease that killed horses making it hard for
Europeans to take advantage of grassland. It was hard for them to get in the African countries and
harder to get materials to their soldiers. They had to fight with swords because their guns did not
have much range so there were useless without horses. The Africans also had swords, knives, and
spires. They were also more skilled than the Europeans. But another advantage the Europeans had
was steam–powered boats. They could pull into ports with soldiers and materials. They also
maintained trade in the ports which made them a lot of

Imperialism impacted Africa and india by the motivations that they had like power over the people.
Power over the people made it so they would have to report to a higher power and not be able to
control themselves. This lead to the change of religion to what the higher power choose. They could
take the resources that the country had for example gold, weapons, food and even other humans.
That brought slave trading and just the basic trade of resources that other countries needed.
Imperialism impacted Africa by two motivations. First were the slaves that Europeans had to trade
which was a huge profit for many of the europeans that owned slave or europeans that were selling
them. The effects of this was that with time many of the europeans lost interest in the slave trade
ended up being forgotten. This lead to motivation two which is the interest in raw materials like
peanuts, tumbler, hides and palm oil. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
First the british took over the india which in then were able to use their resources like cows and pigs.
The effects of this were both for resources and religion wise. Cows and pigs were sacred for the
indian people because of their religion. The effect of this was the india's revolting against the british
because they were offended by this act of the killing of their sacred animals. In the end they ended
up losing but still making a point of their religion.
Imperialism Impacts in modern days just like it did with Africa and India.Countries are still
suffering cause of a higher power than doesn't help or even encouraged the facts that resources are
low. It all comes from the article "Refugee children making dangerous trip to safety in Europe
without parents". These children are trying to escape their home because of hunger and it they dont
leave then they have to fight with for Daash. This shows that imperialism affected not just the 1800–
1914 if affected modern day

British Imperialism In Africa
In the late 19th century, the effects of the Industrial Revolution in Europe began to manifest itself in
new ideas, and the scramble for Africa began. Laden with natural resources and territory to continue
nationalistic policies, African fever began to take hold in a variety of European countries. Great
Britain, continuing to lead Europe in ingenuity and success took its first steps onto South Africa led
by Cecil Rhodes, a financial leader, and passionate Briton. The British Empire was eager to continue
its dominance on the world stage through the acquisition of territories, yet Rhodes offered a
different opinion on this matter, instead hoping to exponentially increase the number of white
Britons across the globe and dominate inferior races ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Written in 1877, Rhodes showcases his belief in Anglo–Saxon superiority in stating that "I contend
that we [Britons] are the first race in the world, and the more of the world we inhabit, the better it is
for the human race...It is our duty to seize every opportunity of acquiring more territory and we
should keep this one idea steadily before our eyes that more territory simply means more of the
Anglo–Saxon race, more of the best, the most human, most honorable race the world possesses"
(Rhodes–Confession of Faith). Rhodes explains how he shares the same view as the British Empire
in that the acquisition of territory is mandatory, as well as the belief that Britons are the solution to
the rest of the human race, and that they can, and will, improve the world through their racial
superiority. With his beliefs coupled alongside his newfound power as Prime Minister, Rhodes
began to execute laws and acts to enforce his

Imperialism was a time of new inventions, technology, and many other things. Imperialism had
many positive things like, transportation, spread of technology, and an increase in education.
Because of Imperialism transportation became a thing. Also communication with other foreign
countries became a thing. Then there was an increase in education too. Without imperialism
transportation would not be a thing. One example is railroads, railroads are used for transporting
people to and from their destinations. Another example are steamboats, without steamboats people
would never be able to transport their goods to and from. People will say "but slaves made these
railroads." Well without transportation everyone would have to walk to every single place we
wanted to go. Because of imperialism spread of languages around the world started to happen. An
example of this is that now tribes can communicate with other foreign countries, this is good
because now we can understand tribes and what they are trying to say to us. Also other foreign
countries can communicate with each other, like africans can now learn and speak english because a
lot of Africa's land in taken over by great britain. A very good thing about the spread of languages is
that we can learn new languages ourselves and speak to the countries we have ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Because of this happening kids will grow up with an a lot better education than most kids.Also the
kids will grow up and be able to get a job, they will be able to get a job because they have a better
education than most kids. Since you will probably get a job with your education, it will not just be a
lazy job it will be a fairly good job. This is because you have met all of your requirements to get the
job education wise and you can do the job right. People might say "well not everyone will get a
good education." Yes that is true but the people who are able to go to school will have a very good

Effects Of Imperialism In Africa
INTRODUCTION
It can be refferd to as a period whereby European powers colonised, invaded, occupied and annexed
African territories in a very rapid and unprecedented manner, even though there was little interest in
Africa up to the 1870's. In fact, up to 1880 Europeans ruled merely 10% of the African continent.
Yet within 30 years, by 1914, European nations will have claimed all of Africa except Liberia (a
small territory of freed slaves from the United States) and Abyssinia (Ethiopia), which had
successfully held off Italian invaders at the battle of Adowa in 1896. The partitioning of Africa was
seen as a means of easing tensions between European states which was high in the late 19th century
and avoid a full blown out war in Europe ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, New Imperialism was backed up by industrialists who, while extending the limits of their
markets, promoted the political expansion of western empires. The wish to realize new investments
in Africa. Industrial bourgeois were constantly searching for lucrative investments, ranging from the
exploitation of natural resources, such as farming or mining extraction, to production of goods, such
as electric appliances, or to services, such as legal counselling. The new businesses in Africa
provided huge returns because the western consumers demanded more and more items that required
to be made with foreign materials. The industrialization revolution stimulated the intensification of
economic relations between the West and the Africa that increased industrialists' greed and, as a
consequence, cemented their desire to expand western possessions in Africa to make more money.
Therefore, the aggregate investments abroad were one of the economic levies that amplified the
expansion in Africa. In addition there was the idea of "civilizing" people in Africa. This was a
religious motive for many Christian missionaries, in attempt to save the souls of the "uncivilized"
people, and of the idea that Christians and the

Effects of European Imperialism in Africa Amidst the thriving chaos of the Industrial Revolution
and subsequent to the politically volatile French Revolution, Europe in the 1800s was an ever–
changing realm of new systems, machines, methods of transportation, ideas, and leaders. Those
leaders faced a plethora of challenges both internally and externally, as both their subjects and other
countries were angry with them for various reasons. One of the problems these rulers faced was the
matter of imperial power on other continents. So, the more relevant European leaders met at the
Berlin Conference to decide what each country was allowed to colonize. In doing so, the rulers they
legalized the Scramble for Africa, therefore allowing colonization ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The vibrant ways of life of man Africans was turned into weeks of excruciating labor, the elaborate
societal and structures in place were disrupted, mental development was crushed, and Congolese
were massacred (Morel). In the words of journalist Edward Morel, "to kill the soul in a people–this
is a crime which transcends physical murder" (Morel). Morel wrote about the atrocities he witnessed
to raise awareness, as many people were ignorant to them. Some Europeans were actively ignoring
the truth, whereas others were ignorant solely because they were being left in the dark as to what
was truly going on. Regardless, the ignorance surrounding Belgian Congo allowed the atrocities
committed there to continuously occur. Another way in which ignorance enabled the crimes
committed under imperial rule in Africa is the soldiers did not truly comprehend the deplorable
conditions to which they were subjecting the Africans. The Congolese people were forced to endure
starvation, disease, exposure to the elements and to vicious animals, and death. According to one
refugee who survived the barbarity of working in the rubber–producing regions of Belgian Congo,
"the white men and soldiers said: 'Go! You are only beasts yourselves'" (refugee interview).
Evidently, the soldiers actively ignored the Congolese people. Not only were the soldiers ignorant to
how

Imperialism In Africa Dbq
Africa was a nation that was based off of selling slaves in which the Europeans were familiar with
but by 1807, slavery was abolished which made King Leopold II move onto a different resource to
line his pockets. The resource he started production on was rubber because of the widespread want
for rubber for tires and other manufactured goods. Around the 19th century when Leopold acquired
even more land and expanded his production on rubber and sometimes ivory his managers
proceeded to force labor and strip away daily cleanliness which eventually led to the widespread
disease of malaria which killed as many as 10,000,000 people. With a absolute infectious disease
clouding Africa and the seemingly brutal army brought up by Leopold, what really was the driving
force behind European Imperialism in Africa?
While Nationalism is not the main driving force it is a secondary force which did help Britain to
expand their rule and take over other smaller countries. Britain later became part of the "Scramble
for Africa" in which they received the best bits of land due to their high rule and monumental army
and land size. Nationalism also aided France and other countries in the scramble for Africa.
Nationalism did not have the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Document D is shows that Britain needed the resources and goods that Britain needed to further
their own economic status. Africa held much potential for Great Britain so they took and pillaged
what Africa had resource wise and did not think twice about it. The main reason why Britain
decided to capture Africa is because that with the exponential growth of Britain and its
manufacturing process with railroads, automobiles and steam engines ended up becoming a real
drain on their resources. When Britain saw the opportunity to seize a country for valuable resources
that they desperately needed they took the initiative and seized the country with haste and

In a time period beginning in the 19th century, the British Empire imperialized all over the world.
there are many examples of Great Britain imperializing other nations during this time, but China,
Africa, and India should be looked at with a microscope. Imperialism is one of the big reasons why
these nations have grown and prospered through the years. It introduced medicine, education,
advanced transportation and communications, and religion. The introduction of religion is both good
and bad, some say it was forced upon the citizens but others say differently. With these incredible
positive effects came some negatives. The stealing of land, cheap labor, taxing, and slavery is never
good. Imperialists were clearly wrong in some parts, but the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
European imperialists built on the information provided by adventurers and missionaries. For
example, a Scottish missionary named David Livingstone, went to Africa in the 1840s and spent
three decades exploring the interior of Africa. This exploration sparked interest in Africa and others
followed, including the imperialists. (Imperialism in Africa). The Berlin Conference of 1884
allowed Europeans to draw lines on maps and carve Africa into colonies. The result was a
transformation Africa, with essentially all parts of the continent colonized in about fifteen years. The
Europeans continued to interfere with African land and culture. Thus, leading to independent revolts
and eventually lead to the Boer War. This was a conflict between The British and the Dutch farmers.
Black South Africans decided to help the Dutch who were fighting back against their enemies. The
British captured many of these men and put them in concentration camps where many of them died.
The establishment of colonies were actually a positive for Africa. It made for a new way of life
socially, politically and economically. So even with the horrible and unjust concentration camps,
Great Britain was able to give back to the people they conquered in

Africa was like the Tiramisu of the late 1800's. Every European world leader wanted to get their
hands on a decadent, fattening piece of African territory. The richness of the cake represented all of
Africa's natural resources that Europeans wanted, which would provide markets for their products
and raw materials to be used in factories. The cake was dished out during the Berlin Conference
when Otto von Bismarck split it and gave portions to the European guests. Most guests had no
reservations and joyfully indulged in the cake as they thought that they were helping the Africans
improve their cultures. However, no rulers asked any of the Africans how they felt about this and
completely disregarded their opinions. Unlike imperialism in Asia, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This desire caused many European powers to obtain more colonies and also resulted in countries
competing with each other. Prince Leopold needed to prove to the world "that Belgians [must
become] an imperial people capable of dominating and enlightening others" (Leopold). He realized
that Belgium wasn't advancing imperialistically as much as other European nations, and thus, he
made it a competition to become as good as the others. Since this conversation was heavy in
governmental ideas, it probably was between him and a high officer in the Belgian government. To
influence this officer, he used words like "dominating" and "enlightening" to justify his actions and
to receive approval. The British also had strong nationalist feelings, but their empire had already
developed. The British wanted to buy the Suez Canal "as a political transaction... to strengthen
the[ir] empire" (Disraeli). The Suez Canal was an artificial waterway that reduced shipping times for
the British. Instead of traveling all around Africa to reach East Africa, Britain could bypass the long
route using the Suez Canal. This gave them the opportunity to increase shipping efficiency and
charge other nations for the use of it. Making other countries pay them to use the canal was a
symbol that Britain was in control. Britain had a large empire, which made them feel that they also
were in control. Thus, wanting

Imperialism in Africa Essay
Imperialism in Africa
Imperialism is defined as one country's domination of the political, economic, and social life of
another country. In Africa in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, imperialism was present and
growing. The main countries involved in the imperialism in Africa were the French, German, and
Great Britain. The French's empire was mainly in North and West Africa while Britain's colonies
were scattered throughout the continent. Germany ruled over such countries as Tanganyika,
Togoland, and Cameroon, until their defeat in World War I. There were many reasons for the
European countries to be competing against each other to gain colonies in Africa. One of the main
reasons may be that Europeans believed that the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His hands red with black blood
The White Man turned to me;
And in the Conqueror's voice said,
"Boy! A chair, a napkin, a drink."
In Southern Africa, there were mineral discoveries in the 1860, 70, and 80's. These discoveries had
an enormous impact on Southern Africa. These discoveries lead to a "rush" of many fortune hunters
and the establishment of the town of Kimberly, which grew quickly and soon became the largest
urban society in the interior of Southern Africa. Soon the diamond industry was controlled by one
monopolistic company. This was one negative effect of imperialism in Africa. While the foreigners
were diamond hunting, the African people continued to mine for gold. Soon, though, the diamond
industry lost its popularity which an enormous amount of gold was found near present day
Johannesburg. Many of the businessmen that had made fortunes in the diamond industry left and
established a series of gold–mining companies. Once again the native African people were being
taken over by the foreigners. Europeans viewed Africa as a place where there were more jobs as
well as investment opportunities doe the middle class, and a place where the lower class was offered
higher status, better job opportunities, and a chance to leave life behind and start again fresh. They
also believed that the African people were people who needed to be helped so the Europeans went
over on various church missions. Rudyard Kipling's poem, "White Man's

During the 19th century, Imperialism started to break out across the globe. The Age of Imperialism
actually began in 1870, mostly impacting European states, Africa, and the Middle East. This is
where countries gained power by taking over and claiming land that was already inhabited. States
were driven by power and influence, and they all wanted to be the best. This lead to tension and
competition for power among countries. However, places with the biggest army, most advanced
technology, and organized government system were usually the most successful, especially Great
Britain. With this tension over power came conflict over land and territory. Because of its natural
resources and huge coastlines, Africa became the main target for claiming land. European states first
started claiming land on the coast of Africa and then they all fought over who could have the most
land. The Berlin Conference was a meeting between all the states fighting for land, including
Britain, France, Germany, and the U.S. The intent of this conference was to settle tension over
territory and reduce conflict over land on the African ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
European colonies used these territories to expand their economic and military influence. They
wanted as much land as they could get from Africa to thrive off of their natural resources and have
power over other countries. This conference was called to happen due to the overlap and confusion
over colonies, access to coastlines, slavery, and trade in Africa. Most of the conflict came from
states that were interested in the same territory. At one point, European ships had taken over 11
million people into slavery from the West African Coast. They grew rich on profits from the slaves
while the population of West Africa became devastated. The Berlin Conference had intent to abolish
african slavery and establish better trade between

Imperialism In Africa Dbq
The weak always gets taken over. That pretty much explains imperialism. Imperialism was was in
1875–1914 in Africa. What was the driving force behind European imperialism in Africa? That is
that question that I aim to answer in this essay. The term driving force means reasoning or push. The
word imperialism is the act of fully taking over a country. I have three main reasons for the driving
force behind European imperialism in Africa: get materials, national competition and to gain more
power. The main reason was so that Europeans can gain more power. One of the main reasons
behind imperialism in Africa is to get materials. In the chart from Document D, a document showing
colonies land and resources that came with, Great Britain went after South Africa for the gold and
diamonds. Great Britain got those resources because they were the most valuable resources over any
other. Portugal went after angola because of its specific materials. Angola has clothing materials
which would also sell high in the market back then. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Document B Fabri says, "It would be wise if we Germans would learn about colonial skills from
our Anglo–Saxon cousins would begin–in a friendly competition–to strive after them.". He is trying
to say that the Germans are as good as the Britain and is not afraid to go against them. Other
countries just wanted to keep up. They also thought that they were equal or better than other
countries. They would not be bested by the others. This is called Nationalism. Nationalism is having
high pride in your country and thinking that your nation is the best and the only way to be. That is
why national

British Imperialism In Africa
Imperialism in Africa was a hindrance towards development of African states as independent
nations. Borders being drawn poorly, horrible treatment of the people originally living there, and
dependence on the mother country were all responsible for delaying the countries of Africa
becoming modern an independent land.
Imperialism is a specific form of colonial rule where the mother country does not send its own
people to the country. Imperialism is characterized by indirect rule by the parent country. European
nations frequently created large imperial possessions for wealth and exports. European countries
often exploited other lands, such as Africa for natural resources. Africa was often exploited for its
precious minerals and metals. Ivory ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also, a large portion of eastern edge of Cape Town was surrounded by native people that had many
conflicts with themselves. The British in the late 19th early 20th century the British were still a
minority in South Africa. During this time, the British to prevent South Africa from becoming
independent used various tactics to keep South Africa part of the British Empire. One such tactic
used by the British was to keep South Africa was to foster a British identity in South Africa.
Additionally, the British used a connected economic, commercial, and strategic link between South
Africa and Britain. Essentially Britain made South Africa dependent on Britain for their economic
and financial stability. The also laid the foundation for Apartheid which was the separation of races
other than white in South Africa. Britain also made their other colonies dependent on them. Africa
was very important to European countries due to it's natural resources coal, gold and other
resources. Especially in the Congo which was a source of revenue for Belgium. The Berlin
Conference divided up Africa in 1884 between the European countries to prevent conflict between
the parent countries. Borders were drawn on

Africa's rich history and unique geographic features make this continent vastly different from the six
others on this planet. Being the only continent with a majority of its landmass lying in the tropics,
it's inhabitants adapted to their situation accordingly. Unlike Europe, who adopted industry, Africans
developed in small, isolated tribes due to the rugged geography, which led to problems with
government and poverty when Europeans tried to implement their ways on native people. The
extremely diverse geographic features of Africa, including its deserts, mountains, valleys and
rainforests obstructed movement from place to place, making it much easier for people to live in
smaller groups. These tribes all had their own unique languages and ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This exploitation along with the problems new governments faced when trying to unify tribal groups
is why a big portion of the continent today lives in poverty. In the late 1800's, when European
nations began to realize the huge amount of resources needed to fuel the industrial revolution, they
sought out Africa for the solution. These nations came in and divided up Africa with little regard for
ethnic groups and began to ship resources back to their homeland. For over half a century Africa lost
abundances of it's natural resources to Europeans, which greatly stressed the countries when they
were given their independence back. Along with having smaller amounts of natural resources to fuel
their economy, African countries were also plagued with civil war, due to the way the continent was
divided up. 40% of sub–Saharan countries have experienced civil war largely because of differences
in cultural and political beliefs. On prominent African civil war existed in Nigeria where after
gaining their independence, cultural differences led the Ibo people to rebel against the government
and declare independence as the Republic of Biafra. "A 3 year war ensued that left hundreds of
thousands dead" (Ellis and Esler 1030). Similar wars existed in countries throughout the continent,
greatly hurting Africa's economic

Imperialism South Africa
The neoliberal policies, which South Africa has implemented after the end of the Apartheid era, has
lead to increased inequality, both on the national as well as the global level. This has led many to
argue that South Africa today faces a new kind of imperialism, one that is not so much based on
political subordination but rather on a new type of economic subordination through a so–called
"empire of capital". This idea, among others, falls under the broader theory of "economic
imperialism".
According to the proponents of Economic Imperialism, neoliberal policies are driven by the logic of
private accumilation of capital based on the exploitation of labour throughout the world, which has
in turn caused a world–wide system of production and labour exploitation, with extreme levels of
inequality and a system of dependency relations as a result. It becomes quickly clear, when defining
economic imperialism, that it looks very unfavourably towards both the developed West and
neoliberalism. Whether this can be justified however, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It therefore also remains questionable whether or not neoliberalism is such a negative development
at all. In the absence of alternative histories it is always easy to blame all the problems of the present
on certain political courses, while neglecting the good developments it has brought to the country.
Unfortunately, a thorough theoretical discussion on neoliberalism has been outside the scope of our
paper. But whether or not neoliberalism becomes to be seen in a more positive light is ultimately
dependent on the economic development of South Africa, something to which the future will
provide us an answer

In the wake of the industrial revolution, many European countries gained economic power as well
and eventually military power. The first to invest in the industrial revolution was Great Britain,
making the nation one of the most hegemonic powers since it was able to gain advantage over the
other European nation who was involved in the Balance of Power, which was created in 1815, and
involved Great Britain, Russia, Prussia, France, and Austria. The Balance of Power was created to
help prevent major wars between the nations whereby, every nation stated would have and equitable
military based on its size and location however, since Britain industrialized, the nation was able to
erode the balance of power and industrialization was able to make size obsolete because of
mechanized and advanced weaponry. As a result, Britain was able to surpass the other nations and
was able to expand its nation and belief around the. Ultimately, as a result Britain was able to
become the most hegemonic nation around the world. One of the locations Britain was able to
colonize was Africa by the nineteenth century where it was ultimately able to aid the Africans, by
spreading Christianity and helped improve the overall conditions in the conquered area and
assimilated the Africans to European cultures, as well as advance the Africans technology.
Great Britain first expanded because of the belief and mindset created by the belief of Social
Darwinism. Social Darwinism is the

Imperialism In Africa Essay
When looking at imperialism and the future it because mostly I look at what has happened in
African and its effects on the modern world it has had. In the weeks reading, chapter 9, it talks a lot
about imperialism, and how it shaped the world in the 19th century. Imperialism was never new to
many European countries, however just the shire mass, and shire modernization that the European
had is probably what made them be able to hold on to their catches for as long as they did. The "new
imperialism" differed a lot because of the new technologies that they had and differed from how
people actually understood these new places. It wasn't so much considered "the new world" rather it
was considered something more that people could and would just take over and control. To gain
wealth, spread religion like in all imperialism type situations and the knowledge that they could
actually force there was into places is what grew and expanding their logic. These places, I am
referring to are the great countries we've been talking about, and these countries gained great
amounts of wealth through these ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Through the force of the slave labor and even finding out that Africa has a lot of rare– and label
natural resources that we gave purge and plunder. If our ancestors were so greedy for wealth would
we be as great and powerful as we were? Probably not, and many of the causes that plague Africa
today probably wouldn't have come to such a magnitude if it wasn't for the greed. However not
everything that I can see from these places is all 100% bad, just the extraordinary and decent things
that came out of it does have the cost of blood on it. Although what happened to these places was a
bad thing, it ended up helping humanity in the countries to be able to do things in such a small
amount of time that it boggles the mind

Old Imperialism In Africa
Throughout history, Africa and the Middle East have been colonized by many different countries
around the world. Imperialism and colonialism have had great impacts on the occupied country,
economically, socially, and culturally.
Imperialism is a policy of growing a powerful country by extending its rule over foreign, weaker
countries, often to gain influence in that country's politics and economy. Imperialism is often carried
out to take advantage of resources in another country. During the "Age of Imperialism", there were
two different eras: Old Imperialism and New Imperialism. During the Old Imperialism Age,
Europeans were seeking routes to Asia, and started to colonize in the Americas, Africa, and Asia.
From the 1800s to the 1900s, it was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There are themes of Africa's past versus its present, economic problems in the new countries,
corruption, and women's rights and roles in African society. African literature has many
characteristics, such as appropriating colonial languages, colonial discourse, the history of Africa,
decolonization struggles, and nationalism. Some major authors are Buchi Emecheta, who wrote
Second–Class Citizen, Bessie Head, who wrote A Question of Power, Ousmane Sembène, who
wrote Xala, Ngugi wa Thiong'o, who wrote A Grain of Wheat, Nuruddin Farah, who wrote Maps,
and Wole Soyinka, who wrote A Play of

Causes of Imperialism in Africa
Melissa B5 Imperialism in Africa In the late 1800's Europeans took over Africa, took their
resources,enslaving the Africans, and changed the course of history. The Europeans took over
Africa, which is called The Scramble For Africa, in 1884–1914. The Europeans took over because
Africa was rich in raw materials, they wanted power, and they thought their culture was superior.
The driving force behind imperialism was need for resources, political competition, and
technological advances. One driving force behind imperialism was need for natural resources.
Document E uses a bar graph to show imports and exports in 1854, and 1900 between Great Britain
and South Saharan Africa. Great Britain made 3 million British pounds in 1854, and 21 ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Document A can be used to explain a driving force behind European imperialism in Africa because
it shows where and what the Europeans were competing for. The final driving force behind
imperialism was technological advances. Document C is a chart that shows when the technological
development was invented and what the use and significance was for each invention. Most of the
technology in the chart was invented in the 19th centry. One of the inventions which was the method
of getting quinine from cinchona tree bark cured a tropical diesease called Malaria, and the
repeating rifle gave European armies an advantage over African armies. The most important
invention was the method of getting quinine because it saved lives by treating people before they
died of sickness. Document C could be used to explain the primary cause of European imperialism
in Africa because they needed resources to advance their technology so they could take over
Africa.Technological factors were not more of a primary cause of European imperialism in Africa
than political reasons or nation pride because they believed the Africans were uncivilized and it was
their duty and right to take over. The Europeans wanted to take over the world because they believed
it was their right and they were helping everything to become better. Therefore the driving force
behind imperialism was need for resources, political competition, and technological

"In imperialism nothing fails like success. If the conqueror oppresses his subjects, they will become
fanatical patriots, and sooner or later have their revenge; if he treats them well, and governs them for
their good, they will multiply faster than their rulers, till they claim their independence," William
Ralph Inge. It was not a good beginning for European imperialism in Africa. Between the 1500s and
1800s, european slavers and traders did not travel far from the african coast. The west coast of
Africa was known as "the white man's grave." Throughout the 300 years in Africa it was said to be
about buying slaves from the chief and managing to escape the waters of west Africa with your crew
and cargo still alive, instead of imperialism. Important ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The map explains, that there was notable rivalry in europe for African colonies with only two
exceptions, Liberia, and Ethiopia. Every square mile of Africa's region was taken (Doc A). This
holds importance because the two countries that did stay independent, expanded as well. A majority
rule of dictators wanted more land; facts. These next sources present the evidence that their national
identities were focused on being economic and industrial powers. Not to mention, in the passage it
states that Fabri believed that Germany needs to "strive after" colonies (Doc B). This matters
because Germany needed to compete with the Anglo–Saxons or the British to maintain its new
position of "industrial greatness." Meanwhile, Ruskin says the colonists' first aim of England
"should be to advance the power of England by land and sea ," (Doc

New Imperialism in Africa was caused by many factors, and had a great impact on the histories of
both Europe and Africa, because of Europe's gain of land, money, and power, and Africa's loss of
culture and way of life. Although I see and understand motives by the Europeans, I do not agree that
they were justified for their actions in Africa. New Imperialism was a period of colonial expansion
into closer regions, such as Africa, by the strong European nations in the late 19th and early 20th
centuries. In 1869, the French finished the Suez Canal in Egypt, which connects the Mediterranean
Sea to the Red Sea, which ultimately leads to the Indian Sea. This shortcut to India was wanted by
all of Europe, and this worried Britain about their colony ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Almost every action done by Europeans was with the motive of gaining more wealth and becoming
more powerful, and this includes imperialism. In the eyes of the Europeans, by civilizing the
natives, the markets created far outweighed the losses of life and also culture to the natives. In my
eyes, it was not at all justified. The loss of thousands of years of culture is not worth the expansion,
money, or power. It was only a facade that all Europeans agreed with the imperialistic empire, as
seen in "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell. The narrator, a European police officer in Burma
saw that "imperialism was an evil thing" and "was all for the Burmese and all against their
oppressors, the British." The story shows the expectation placed on the Europeans to uphold this
superiority, as seen with the narrator shooting the elephant "solely to avoid looking a fool" in front
of the natives. I think that the people agreeing with imperialism were the minority in population, but
they were the majority in power, which is why the majority of the world started as European
colonies. All in all, I do not believe the Europeans were justified for their actions in Africa, and this
part of history directly influenced the

Factors Of Imperialism In Africa
There were many factors that contributed to imperialism in Africa. Imperialism is when a nation
plans to dominate or take over another but in political, economic, or social ways. The Europeans'
were trying to dominate Africa and there were many factors that played a role in this. One of the
major advantages that the Europeans' had was their technological advancements. They were usually
the first people to acquire new items that were more advanced. One of these items was the Maxim
gun. It was the worlds first automatic machine gun and it was created in 1884. As the Europeans' got
ahold of this new weapon, the Africans' were forced to use the outdated weapons. The steam engine
was another advancement that the Europeans' had. It allowed them to travel on the rivers in order to
create bases of control in Africa. They did this because they wanted to take control over their
empire. Steam engines weren't the only thing helping people communicate with close nations.
Railroads, cables, and steamships all allowed the nations to talk with each other. There was a major
problem as time went on. Malaria started to take over Africa. Malaria is a disease that is carried by
swarms of mosquitoes. The problem kept the Europeans' on the coast and prevented them from
going too deep into Africa. Of course there was another factor that allowed them to travel into
Africa. That was the perfection of the drug quinine in 1824. The factors in Africa made it easier for
the Europeans' to colonize it. Africa had such a diverse community that it made it hard for them to
unite. All the different languages and cultures were the problem. The Europeans' learned to play
rivals groups against each other for their benefit. These ethnic groups fought wars which were
caused by control over land, water, and trade rights. Since the groups already disliked each other
then why not create more tension between them in order to help yourself? That's exactly what the
Europeans' did and it was a very good idea. These were just a couple of factors that played a role to
imperialism in Africa. Africans weren't buying a lot of the Europeans goods. The Europeans' were
trying to find a way that they could divide Africa without causing a war between each other.

The race for expansion was the particular driving force for the scramble of South East Asia and
Africa. The motivation or theme when imperializing a country would be for its size, quantity
raw/natural materials, and the native people basically Social Darwinism. These two countries both
contained the abundance and natural materials needed by the colonizers. The view on how the same
country affected each country was completely two different outcomes and results.
During the late nineteenth century, the major European powers scrambled to colonize Africa. Before
the 1880, the Europeans controlled little of the African continent. Using indirect and direct rule,
European nations exploited Africa, and their governance stimulated African nationalism. The
positive effects of imperialism were the cultural benefits that could be profited. Cultural Imperialism
in Africa was responsible ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The initial goal of European countries was to maximize the economic potential of their colonies.
Colonial rule in Africa was quite the same as Southeast Asia, most European governments ruled
their new territories in Africa with the least effort and expense possible, the Europeans rule on
Africa was indirect. Indirect rule meant that relying on existing political elites and institutions, the
British had especially followed this approach and in some areas the British simply asked a local
ruler to accept their authority and to put their flag over every official building. Indirect rule led to
some negative consequences, the British were basically fraud because their administrators made all
the major decisions. The colonial powers endeavored to minimize the costs of their empires. The
negative effects of colonization and colonial rule were briefly depicted in Kipling's poem named
"The White Man's Burden" (Documents 7). The poem itself stated

Causes Of Imperialism In Africa
Do people suffer from imperialism? Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and
influence through diplomacy or military force. Europe had many driving forces for wanting
imperialism in Africa. They succeeded in their drive for imperialism, but at what cost? Did Africa
suffer from the imperialism or did they benefit from it just as much as Europe? What was Europe's
main reason for imperialism in Africa? Great Britain gained a lot from imperialism in Africa. They
started imports and exports out of South Saharan Africa between 1854 through 1900. In the
beginning of everything imports in Africa were stronger, making about 3.5–4 million pounds within
the first year. Exports made about 2.5 million pounds. By 1900 imports were only making about 13
million pounds, whereas exports boomed and were profiting around 21 million pounds. Great
Britain benefited greatly from controlling this section of Africa making near 40 million pounds in
just 46 years. Whatever part of Europe that was either trading or ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Kipling wrote "Take up the White Man's burden– Send forth the best ye breed– Go bind your sons to
exile To serve your captives' need; To wait in heavy harness, On fluttered folk and wild– Your new–
caught, sullen peoples, Half–devil and half–child... Take up on the White Man's burden– The savage
wars of peace– Fill full the mouth of Famine and bid the sickness cease; And when your goal is
nearest The end for others sought, watch sloth and heathen Folly Bring all your hopes to nought..."
In this he is saying that the White man suffer from being obligated to give the slaves work. He
believes that blacks are uncivilized savages. This is the way Europe felt at the time. So sis Europe
start imperialism in Africa because they felt morally obligated to use Africa and their people for
their own self benefit, not believe that it would cause any harm to

Explain what is meant by the term imperialism. Discuss the causes of imperialism in the 1800s.
Kamar Findlay ID# 092165839 Mico University College Imperialism in Africa Mrs. Pitter October
29, 2011 Imperialism is "the creation and or maintenance of an unequal economic, cultural, and
territorial relationship, usually between states and often in the form of an empire, based on
domination and subordination" (Johnston, 2000.p.375). In its simplest form Farah and Karls (2001)
describes imperialism as one country's domination of the political, economical and social life of
another country. The Europeans imperialism during the 1800s occurs out of the advantages of strong
economies, well organized governments and powerful armies and navies. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Nationalism in the extreme promotes the idea of national superiority. Industrialized countries
therefore felt they had the right to take control of weaker areas. Countries also tried to increase their
power through the control of more land and people. In the 1800s Europe underwent a renewed
period of imperialism which was very sophisticated in its nature. Much emphasis was placed on
gaining or controlling a colony. The resources and wealth gain from the colony was used to finance
war and the army as well as the economy. The stronger a European military gets the more power full
that country become in Europe and as such gaining the wealth from a colony could either break or
build the power and prestige of a nation. When France for example, moved into West Africa, rival
nations such as Britain and Germany seized lands nearby to halt further French expansion. In
essence the Europeans taught of the colonies as a source of security. So strong and sophisticated was
the sentiment of nationalism that it set of what was known as a 'Scramble for Africa. West Africa
was already known to the European but the interior was untouched. The Belgian king Leopold the
second occupies and carry profitable economic activities in the Congo (South Central Africa).
Before long Britain, France, Germany and Italy were all lock in a tussle, pressing rivals claim to the
region. According to Bickers and Henriot

Imperialism in South Africa
During Imperialistic times South Africa was a region of great resources that was greatly disputed
over (Ellis). Europe's main goal during these times was to compete against each other and played a
"game" of which country can imperialize more African countries than the other. Imperialism was a
curse to South Africa, because many wars, laws, and deaths were not necessary and would not have
happened if South Africa were not imperialized.
Imperialism is the domination by one country of political, economic, or cultural life of another
country or region and occurred during the 1800's in Africa. Imperialism in Africa was caused by
four factors in Europe: economy, politics/military, humanitarian/religion, and Social Darwinism
(Ellis). The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Transvaal was a result of the Boers trying to escape the jurisdiction of the British. Then Britain
was able to gain control of the Transvaal and move deeper into Cape Colony where the Dutch
settlements were (Luscomb; Transvaal). The Boers were able to resist The British using guerilla
warfare and home field advantage. However, the Second Boer war was a different story.
The Second Boer War, sometimes called the South African War, was from 1899 to 1902 and the
British were finally able to defeat the Boers and gain control over all of South Africa ("South
Africa."). By 1910 almost all of Britain had left South Africa due to World War II and South Africa
was no longer imperialized. After imperialism South Africa became a union with the Cape and Natal
colonies, Orange Free State, and The Transvaal (Luscomb). The four settlements then changed the
name to The Union of South Africa, then South Africa in 1934 when it was declared a Republic.
South Africa's government is a Republic, just like America. There are three branches to both of the
governments, the executive, the legislative, and the judicial ("Three Capitals"). Unlike America,
South Africa actually has three capitals. When the Union was formed in 1910 each settlement
wanted the capital to be in their own town. The Union also believed that having a centralized
government would bring too much power, so

Consequences Of Imperialism In Africa
The Industrial Revolution made many new inventions that had many sources of energy and
materials needed to make them. For the nations with this technology, Imperialism was a way for
them to further Industrialize and generate economy. Imperialism is the act of one country expanding
its power to other territory in order to colonize and gain resources, economy, knowledge, and
control. European countries with strong militaries used Imperialism in order to achieve these goals
but caused consequences in the long term. Africa, China, And India were imperialized by European
countries due to the cheap labor, raw resources, research opportunities, and consumers available but
this was greeted with many rebellions, many deaths, unfair treaties, and spreading of technology and
knowledge from one country to the next. European powers wanted to colonize in Africa due to
cheap labor and raw resources available which led to many enslaved people brutally dieing and
territory being dispersed between other countries.The resources found in Africa were diamonds,
jewels, and copper which were being mined out by the native enslaved people. Ivory and hides of
animals were popular for colonists to have. Normal citizens of tribes were dieing due to forced labor
and native animals were dying due to hunting. Colonists didn't even see imperialism as a bad thing
to the native people of Africa, seen in the poem "A White Man's Burden." Scientists saw Africa as
an opportunity to expand knowledge in the

For centuries, the territories surrounding the Congo River were a blank space on the map of the
African continent. They came suddenly into the public eye at the beginning of the twentieth century
(1903), with the publication of Roger Casement's report on the conditions under which the rubber
trade was conducted in the Upper Congo. The colonial period in Africa gave birth to different forms
of violence; however, King Leopold's Congo Free State from c. 1884 to 1907 was a specific case
that amassed the most extreme form of violence. Hence, this paper will discuss the events that led
up to the Red Rubber regime generated by King Leopold violent rule over the Congo Free State.
The Belgian colonization of the Congo River basin was a unique conquest. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Morel discusses the horrendous condition of the Congo territories during 20 years of King Leopold's
rule. According to Morel, five years after the foundation of the Congo Free State brought about
many lessons, unpalatable disclosures, and bitter disillusion of the earlier promises made by
Leopold during the Berlin Conference. He states, "The veil of philanthropic motive concealing the
face of the Congo sphinx had been brushed aside somewhat, and the features which it concealed
were not nearly so benign as the world had had reason to expect from the many honeyed words
previously uttered [by Leopold and Stanley]." A series of events occurred under the guise of a
philanthropic undertaking – merchant exports were severely taxed; military forces of the State
doubled between the years of 1885–1889; trade was heavily handicapped, rather than being
encouraged; and the State passed a decree that proclaimed all 'vacant land' to be its property. The
records of the Congo from 1980 onwards are literally soaked in blood. There are many letters that
speak of the atrocities committed by the State's soldiers upon women and young children which
include, but not limited to, being seized and imprisoned. The State's army recruited Congo men who
were taken for twelve years (seven in active service, and five in the reserve) and was kept occupied
by murdering in order to maintain a steadfast supply of

Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and
then colonized those countries in order to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling
countries to use the weaker countries for their resources such as oil, water, and land. Colonizing
other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There
are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries
"scrambled" for Africa, it seemed as though Africans had no say in anything that was happening to
their country. During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for their own growth and
power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Before European domination, the people of Africa were divided into hundreds of ethnic and
linguistic groups. Most followed traditional beliefs, while others converted to Islam or Christianity.
Europeans divided Africa and ignored the tribal, ethnic, and cultural boundaries of the African
people. This has led to tribal conflicts in many African nations that continue to this day. In South
Africa, for example, natives suffered from apartheid. Apartheid is segregation of political and
economic discrimination against non–europeans in South Africa. Cultural groups were also split
apart during imperialism. European leaders picked favorite culture groups, resulting in rivalries.The
East African states lost their independence and were subjected to european rule and administration
and many African chiefs and kings either were killed or sent to exile. The Africans were seen as an
inferior group and were forced to labor for European plantations. With the increase in Europeans
moving to East Africa, natives lost their land and were put into reserved camps. New boundaries
were drawn and defined in East Africa without respect of the tribes which led to disunity of
Africans. The colonies doing the mother country's hard work did not civilize the smaller colonies.
They were put to work as cheap labor. They had no freedom, had to do what the mother country said
since it has so much towering power over them, they were exploited and were taken advantage

The Harms of Imperialism in Africa It is the year 1870, the start of imperialism in Africa and many
other regions. Imperialism is when a country acquires power through domination of others. The
Europeans took control of Africa with their steam engines, advanced medicine, and superior
weaponry. Imperialism harmed Africa because imperialist governments created laws that treated
Africans cruelly and unfairly, Europeans changed how the tribes of Africa lived, and the Europeans
used treaties to control Africans. Imperialism harmed Africa economically because imperialist
governments created laws that treated Africans unfairly and they forced labor on the Africans. For
example, Patrice Lumumba, the first prime minister of the congo said during his independence day
speech, "the law was not the same for a white and for a black, accommodating for the first, cruel and
inhuman for the other (2)." This proves that Imperialism was harmful because the laws made the
Europeans make more money than the Africans. This is important because money equals power; the
Europeans had more power than the Africans. This changed how much the Africans were paid. This
was unjust for the Africans because the Africans and the Europeans deserve to be paid equally. In
addition, Ndansi Kumalo, a Ndebele chief, described the events that took place in Zimbabwe
between 1893 and 1896 as, "...We were treated like slaves. They came and were overbearing and we
were ordered to carry their clothes and bundles (6)."

Racism, industrial capitalism and nationalism all relate to western civilization's competition of
superiority, and this was ultimately what fueled imperialism in Africa. European nations were driven
by the unknown world and exploration was a major part of life in the mid 1800s to early 1900s.
Exploration led to colonization causing even more competition through Europe, due to colonization
directly relating to power. Christianity also played a role in exploration. Exploration happened even
more due to the desire of spreading this religion around the world.
France, Britain and Germany were the main Imperialist powers in Africa during the late 19th
century, and in 1885 they signed the Berlin Act. This formalized the process of partition of Africa. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This can be linked back to nationalism, which is the belief that the interests of a specific nation are
of primary importance. European nations believed strongly in the idea of Social Darwinism which
was created by Charles Darwin who wrote about it in his book, The Descent of Man (1871), which.
Darwin stated, "Those species that were able to adapt were selected for survival, and those that
failed simply perished." In other words, Darwinism was the belief of survival of the fittest, and due
to much less advanced technology and weapons, these Africans were very vulnerable to the
Europeans who did not care for them, but only cared about profit for their country. This is summed
up in Karl Pearson's The Standpoint of Science where he wrote, "You get superior and inferior races
living on the same soil, and that coexistence is demoralizing for both. They naturally sink into the
position of master and servant." Pearson is saying it is natural that the inferior race being the
Africans, became the European's servants. Philp D. Curtin adds to Pearson's idea in The Black
Experience of Colonialism and Imperialism by writing, "It seemed natural to give the lowest rank to
people whose skin color was most different than their own." The working conditions for the
Africans were horrendous, and they were most often p3ayed an insufficient amount to make a
difference in their lives. They were also often guarded by the white farmers who carried rifles to
strike the workers with fear. This unfair labor was the backbone for making profit in Africa. Without
all the added labor, there would have been very little productivity in the

Imperialism And South Africa

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Robin Anderson

More from Robin Anderson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Imperialism And South Africa