MobileHCI 2010 Talk on Smart Object Interaction
•
0 likes•727 views
This talk compares two interaction techniques : mobile augmented reality and personal projection in the context of smart object and internet of things interaction. Fahim Kawsar, Enrico Rukzio, and Gerd Korutem; "An Explorative Comparison of Magic Lens and Personal Projection for Interacting with Smart Objects "; 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2010), Lisboa, Portugal September 7th-10th, 2010.
![“A
computa0onally
instrumented
tangible
object
with
an
established
purpose
that
augments
human
percep0on
and
is
aware
of
its
opera0onal
situa0ons
and
capable
of
providing
supplementary
services
without
compromising
its
original
appearance
and
interac0on
metaphor
significantly.”
-‐
(Kawsar,
2007)
-‐
Perceptual
Augmenta0on
-‐
Device
Centric
Situa0onal
Awareness
-‐
Supplementary
Services
Smart Objects
[Tokuda, 2004][Kawsar, 2005]
[Ishii, 1997][Beigl 2001] [Ambient Device]
[Intelligent Spoon, MIT]
[Ambient Orb, NabazTag,
LG Intelligent Fridge]]()
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to MobileHCI 2010 Talk on Smart Object Interaction
Similar to MobileHCI 2010 Talk on Smart Object Interaction (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
MobileHCI 2010 Talk on Smart Object Interaction
- 1. An Explorative Comparison of Magic Lens and Personal Projection for Interacting with Smart Objects Fahim Kawsar, Enrico Rukzio, Gerd Kortuem Lancaster University
- 2. “A computa0onally instrumented tangible object with an established purpose that augments human percep0on and is aware of its opera0onal situa0ons and capable of providing supplementary services without compromising its original appearance and interac0on metaphor significantly.” -‐ (Kawsar, 2007) -‐ Perceptual Augmenta0on -‐ Device Centric Situa0onal Awareness -‐ Supplementary Services Smart Objects [Tokuda, 2004][Kawsar, 2005] [Ishii, 1997][Beigl 2001] [Ambient Device] [Intelligent Spoon, MIT] [Ambient Orb, NabazTag, LG Intelligent Fridge]
- 3. Design Constrains Form factor and interaction consistency need to be maintained, limiting the output modalities. [Tokuda, 2004][Ishii, 1997][Beigl 2001] [Ambient Orb, NabazTag, LG Intelligent Fridge]
- 4. Solution Space Intangible representa0ons are usually coupled with the tangible representa0ons of the physical smart objects. [SixthSense, MIT] Projected Embedded Mobile Mediator [Tokuda, 2004] [Molyneaux, 2007] [Kawsar, 2005] [Perci, Broll, 2009] [Kawsar, 2007] [Ishii, 1997]
- 5. 0.065p/min Projector Phone Smart Object Magic Lens with Mobile Augmented Reality
- 6. 0.065p/min 90 Projector Phone Projected Screen 90o Smart Object Personal Projection with Pico Projector
- 7. iPhone 3GS + Optoma Projector NyARToolkit for Tracking Private APIs for Custom Projection Prototype Hardware
- 8. Smart Objects and Applications Energy Aware KettleReview Augmented BooksSelf Describing Medicine Box
- 9. Qualitative Study ➡ 12 Par0cipants (7 Male, Age: 22 -‐ 38), recruited through university mailing lists. ➡ Own phones and no prior experience with Augmented Reality or Personal Projec0on Apps. ➡ Performed 3 iden0cal tasks with 2 interac0on techniques. ➡ Sor0ng medicine boxes. ➡ Searching book reviews. ➡ Es0ma0ng energy cost of a keVle. Tasks
- 10. Results: Usability Feedback (IBM Usability Questionnaire)
- 11. Results: NASA Task Workload Index
- 12. Implications
- 13. Decomposition of the Interaction Space
- 16. Mobility
- 19. Summary ➡ Two interac0on techniques for smart objects. ➡ Magic lens metaphor with Mobile Augmented Reality ➡ Personal Projec0on with Pico Projector augmented Phones Personal Projec0on Decomposes the Interac/on Space, requires demanding Hand-‐Eye Co-‐ ordina/on and introduces fragmenta/on of a:en/on, however it yields superior performances over Magic Lens with Situa/onal Disabili/es and in Social Collabora0ve Applica0ons context.