4. Learning Management Systems (LMS)
• An LMS is a comprehensive, integrated
software that supports the development,
delivery, assessment, and administration
of courses in traditional face-to-face,
blended, or online learning
environments.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao4
5. 4 February 2015P.N. Rao6
Learning
Management
Systems
(LMS)
Course
Management
System
(CMS) Learning
Content
Management
System
(LCMS)
Virtual
Learning
Environment
(VLE)
Virtual
Learning
System
(VLS)
Learning
Portal
E-learning
Platform
6. 4 February 2015P.N. Rao7
LMS
Cost
effective
Consiste
nt
delivery
Own
pace
Any
time/
place
Easy to
update
Good for
large
groups
11. LMS Implementation
• Institutions use LMS software to plan,
implement, facilitate, assess, and monitor
student learning.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao12
12. LMS Implementation Challenges
• Leadership commitment
• Stakeholder involvement
• Alignment with the education plan
• Recognition of the cultural changes required
4 February 2015P.N. Rao13
13. LMS Implementation Challenges
• Organizational preparedness
• Training for instructors and students
• Quality support, including pedagogical and
technical support.
• Focus on designing quality courses.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao14
14. LMS Implementation Challenges
• User-friendliness of the software.
• Funds required for implementation
• Due diligence by the LMS selection committee
• Effective project management
4 February 2015P.N. Rao15
15. Free LMS - MOODLE
• “Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning
Environment” - Moodle has been around for over ten
years, with the first version in August 2002.
• It is open source, a lot of community support and a
lot of plugins or add-ons from flash video to
teleconferencing. Need to install on the server.
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuKhBKAgQcA
4 February 2015P.N. Rao16
https://moodle.org/
16. Free LMS - MOODLE
• Livingstone, K. (2013). Implications of Implementing a Blended/Hybrid
Learning Approach at the University of Guyana. Baraton
Interdisciplinary Research Journal 3 (2), 53-62. Retrieved May 14,
2014, from http://ueab.ac.ke/BIRJ/implications-of-implementing-a-
hybrid-learning-approach-at-the-university-of-guyana/
Raturi, S., Hogan, R. & Thaman, K. H. (2011). Learners’ Preference for
Instructional Delivery Mode: A Case Study from the University of South
Pacific (USP). International Journal of Instructional Technology and
Distance Learning, 8 (6), 17-30. Retrieved March 16, 2014, from
http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jun_11/Jun_11.pdf
Whelan, R. & Bhartu, D. (2007). Factors in the deployment of a learning
management system at the University of the South Pacific. Retrieved
June 15, 2014, from
http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/whelan.pdf
4 February 2015P.N. Rao17
https://moodle.org/
20. 4 February 2015P.N. Rao21
Learning
Management
System
Massive Open
Online
Courses
21. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC)
• A massive open online course is an online
course aimed at unlimited participation and
open access via the web.
• MOOCs are a recent development in distance
education which was first introduced in
2008 and emerged as a popular mode of
learning in 2012.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao22
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_open_online_course
22. 4 February 2015P.N. Rao23
"MOOC poster mathplourde" by Mathieu Plourde {(Mathplourde on Flickr) -
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mathplourde/8620174342/sizes/l/in/photostream/. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons -
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MOOC_poster_mathplourde.jpg#mediaviewer/File:MOOC_poster_mathplourde.jpg
23. Example of participation
• An MIT- “Hard circuits and electronics”
course --launched about a year and a half
ago, 155,000 students from 162
countries enrolled in this course.
• 7,200 students passed the course.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao24
http://www.ted.com/talks/anant_agarwal_why_massively_open_online_courses_still
_matter/transcript?language=en
24. Global participation in Coursera MOOCs - 2013
4 February 2015P.N. Rao25
https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/globalhighered/mapping-courseras-global-footprint
25. Academic Financial Trading Platform
• Founded by Carnegie Mellon University professors,
launched online business education courses in 2012
specifically for Indian MBA students and executives.
http://www.academictrader.org/
• Offer massively open online business courses by faculty
from the world's top business schools to a broad
community of students, researchers, and practitioners
around the world completely for FREE.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao26
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Carnegie-Mellon-University-professors-launch-online-business-
education-courses-for-Indian-students/articleshow/17506783.cms?referral=PM
26. http://educateme360.com/
• “Education is a right, not a privilege”
• A New York-based Indian start-up, offers
customized online learning to Indian students.
• Their courses, currently still in the pilot stage,
aim at fighting illiteracy and developing blended
learning.
• They will be made available in various Indian
languages.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao27
27. http://www.edukart.com/
• Started by alumni of Stanford and IIMs.
• Offers degree courses recognized by the
University Grant Commission (UGC) and also
professional certificates.
• Not free.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao28
29. Indian Initiatives
• Delhi University- 'India in 21st century‘ - It will
include 10 lectures delivered by Vice Chancellor
Dinesh Singh.
• Starts from January 30, 2015.
• http://www.swayamlearning.com/ - (Study Webs of
Active-learning for Young Aspiring Minds)
• http://www.mooconmooc.org/#/login
4 February 2015P.N. Rao30
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/education/delhi-university-
set-to-launch-massive-open-online-courses/articleshow/45955770.cms
33. Mobile in India
• The number of mobile internet users in India
is expected to reach 213 million by June
2015- report by the Internet & Mobile
Association of India (IAMAI) which is growing
at a healthier ˜ 10% per quarter.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao34
http://www.iamai.in/PRelease_Detail.aspx?nid=3528&NMonth=1&NYear=2015
34. 4 February 2015P.N. Rao35
http://www.iamai.in/PRelease_Detail.aspx?nid=3528&NMonth=1&NYear=2015
35. Mobile Learning
• Mobiles provide a new, and sometimes only,
access channel to the internet for many people.
• A core feature of mobiles is that they support
‘anywhere, anytime’ learning.
• Because they are personal and always at hand,
they are perfectly suited to support informal
and contextual learning.
• Mobile has a role to play in bridging the formal
and informal learning spaces.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao36
36. Idea Internet Network - IIN
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVE9iGcOYw8
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCH71nzXFdY
4 February 2015P.N. Rao37
37. Mobile Learning
• As of January 2014*
• 58% of American adults have a smartphone
• 32% of American adults own an e-reader
• 42% of American adults own a tablet computer
• Mobile devices have replaced desktop
computers as the primary access device to
the Internet.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao38
* http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/mobile-technology-fact-sheet/
38. Mobile Learning
• Educators should be modeling and mentoring
smartphone use.
• A digitally literate culture in a technology-
driven society should be teaching its students
how to use the devices of choice to access,
curate, communicate, collaborate with and
create information.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao39
39. Mobile Learning
• Educators need to view smartphones not as a
distraction to learning, but as an accelerator.
• Students can use their personal devices to
personalize their learning.
• The where and when about using these
devices may need to be worked out for
effectiveness in an academic setting.
4 February 2015P.N. Rao40
40. Mobile Learning
• To better educate our students, we need
to better educate their educators.
• Address the needs of all learning abilities
• Equity of opportunity should not be
eclipsed by a market-driven agenda
4 February 2015P.N. Rao41
41. Other Trends
• Flipped classroom
• Blended instruction
• Collaborative Group Working using
Mobile phones
• Social media – FB, Linked In,
Research Gate, Edutopia, Blogs, …
4 February 2015P.N. Rao42
LMS systems are known by various names, including course management system (CMS), learning content management system (LCMS), virtual learning environment (VLE), virtual learning system (VLS), learning portal, or e-learning platform. Each term might have a slightly different meaning, depending on your interpretation. Perhaps it should be called an instructional management system, as the system's parameters are usually set by instructors rather than by students. However, throughout this article, we'll use the term LMS.
LMS systems are known by various names, including course management system (CMS), learning content management system (LCMS), virtual learning environment (VLE), virtual learning system (VLS), learning portal, or e-learning platform. Each term might have a slightly different meaning, depending on your interpretation. Perhaps it should be called an instructional management system, as the system's parameters are usually set by instructors rather than by students. However, throughout this article, we'll use the term LMS.
Institutions use LMS software to plan, implement, facilitate, assess, and monitor student learning. The software centralizes course preparation; educational content and resources; the delivery and tracking of student activities, such as discussion and collaboration; the administration of assessment activities; and the accumulation and presentation of marks and grades. All of these activities are conducted behind a virtual wall that provides a measure of authentication, security, and privacy. Recent LMS software also provides an array of information about student activities that instructors and administrators can view from different perspectives. This information can be analyzed to detect patterns that might suggest how students can be better supported. The LMS helps institutions maintain the integrity of their educational programs and enables faculty to effectively and efficiently develop courses, deliver instruction, facilitate communication, foster collaboration, and assess students. An LMS can be used to support traditional face-to-face instruction, as well as blended and online educational environments.
Leadership, not only by management and academic leaders, but also by those who have political influence within the institution.
Commitment to the process, as it takes time and resources before evidence of success emerges.
Organization-wide buy-in and appreciation for what an LMS can and cannot do.
Stakeholder involvement in the selection process.
Alignment with the education plan or direction of the institution.
Congruency with how instructors teach. Implementing an LMS can itself lead instructors to reconsider their teaching methods.
Recognition of the cultural changes required to achieve success. Resistance to change can arise, especially among those familiar with an existing LMS, as they know its shortcomings and have developed workarounds.
Organizational preparedness during implementation — that is, knowing who will be responsible for what.
Training for instructional designers, instructors, students, and information technology specialists.
Quality support, including pedagogical and technical support.
Focus on designing quality courses.
Student and instructor computer literacy skills.
Student access to computers, the Web, and/or the LMS.
Adequate access to the Internet for students and staff.
User-friendliness of the software. The software must be easy to use, even for novices.
Funds required for hardware, including servers, network infrastructure, backup storage, backup power supply, air conditioning for the hardware, and computers/digital terminals.
Due diligence by the LMS selection committee to adequately address the needs and concerns of the potential users, verify the information provided by vendors and external experts, and ensure that the selected LMS can actually perform the tasks requested by users.
Effective project management to ensure that the selection process and implementation succeed.
Leadership, not only by management and academic leaders, but also by those who have political influence within the institution.
Commitment to the process, as it takes time and resources before evidence of success emerges.
Organization-wide buy-in and appreciation for what an LMS can and cannot do.
Stakeholder involvement in the selection process.
Alignment with the education plan or direction of the institution.
Congruency with how instructors teach. Implementing an LMS can itself lead instructors to reconsider their teaching methods.
Recognition of the cultural changes required to achieve success. Resistance to change can arise, especially among those familiar with an existing LMS, as they know its shortcomings and have developed workarounds.
Organizational preparedness during implementation — that is, knowing who will be responsible for what.
Training for instructional designers, instructors, students, and information technology specialists.
Quality support, including pedagogical and technical support.
Focus on designing quality courses.
Student and instructor computer literacy skills.
Student access to computers, the Web, and/or the LMS.
Adequate access to the Internet for students and staff.
User-friendliness of the software. The software must be easy to use, even for novices.
Funds required for hardware, including servers, network infrastructure, backup storage, backup power supply, air conditioning for the hardware, and computers/digital terminals.
Due diligence by the LMS selection committee to adequately address the needs and concerns of the potential users, verify the information provided by vendors and external experts, and ensure that the selected LMS can actually perform the tasks requested by users.
Effective project management to ensure that the selection process and implementation succeed.
Leadership, not only by management and academic leaders, but also by those who have political influence within the institution.
Commitment to the process, as it takes time and resources before evidence of success emerges.
Organization-wide buy-in and appreciation for what an LMS can and cannot do.
Stakeholder involvement in the selection process.
Alignment with the education plan or direction of the institution.
Congruency with how instructors teach. Implementing an LMS can itself lead instructors to reconsider their teaching methods.
Recognition of the cultural changes required to achieve success. Resistance to change can arise, especially among those familiar with an existing LMS, as they know its shortcomings and have developed workarounds.
Organizational preparedness during implementation — that is, knowing who will be responsible for what.
Training for instructional designers, instructors, students, and information technology specialists.
Quality support, including pedagogical and technical support.
Focus on designing quality courses.
Student and instructor computer literacy skills.
Student access to computers, the Web, and/or the LMS.
Adequate access to the Internet for students and staff.
User-friendliness of the software. The software must be easy to use, even for novices.
Funds required for hardware, including servers, network infrastructure, backup storage, backup power supply, air conditioning for the hardware, and computers/digital terminals.
Due diligence by the LMS selection committee to adequately address the needs and concerns of the potential users, verify the information provided by vendors and external experts, and ensure that the selected LMS can actually perform the tasks requested by users.
Effective project management to ensure that the selection process and implementation succeed.
The advantage is that it is available in more than 100 languages! Moodle is trusted with millions of users all over the world. Definitely MOODLE!
The advantage is that it is available in more than 100 languages! Moodle is trusted with millions of users all over the world. Definitely MOODLE!
A massive open online course is an online course aimed at unlimited participation and open access via the web.
In addition to traditional course materials such as filmed lectures, readings, and problem sets, many MOOCs provide interactive user forums to support community interactions between students, professors, and teaching assistants (TAs). MOOCs are a recent development in distance education which was first introduced in 2008 and emerged as a popular mode of learning in 2012.
an MIT-hard circuits and electronics course -- about a year and a half ago, 155,000 students from 162 countries enrolled in this course.
And we had no marketing budget. Now, 155,000 is a big number. This number is bigger than the total number of alumni of MIT in its 150-year history. 7,200 students passed the course, and this was a hard course. 7,200 is also a big number. If I were to teach at MIT two semesters every year, I would have to teach for 40 years before I could teach this many students.
EduKart, which promotes itself as “India’s leading online education company” offers degree courses recognised by the Indian University Grant Commission (UGC) and also professional certificates. Most courses are provided by Indian higher education institutions, some by international higher education institutions. EduKart emphasises that it tailors its offer to industry needs: it provides corporate courses; supports job matching; and rates its graduates on an “EduKart Rating of Employability”.
The founder of the organization, Salman Khan, was born and raised in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States to a father fromBarisal, Bangladesh, and mother from Calcutta, India.[7] After earning three degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (a BS in mathematics, a M.Sc. in electrical engineering and computer science, and an MEng in electrical engineering and computer science) he pursued an MBA from Harvard Business School.
In late 2004, Khan began tutoring his cousin Nadia in mathematics using Yahoo!'s Doodle notepad. When other relatives and friends sought similar help, he decided it would be more practical to distribute the tutorials on YouTube.[8][9] Their popularity there and the testimonials of appreciative students prompted Khan to quit his job in finance as a hedge fund analyst at Connective Capital Management in 2009, and focus on the tutorials (then released under the moniker "Khan Academy") full-time.[9] The project is funded by donations. Khan Academy is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization,[4] now with significant backing from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Ann and John Doerr, the Brazil-based Lemann Foundation, and Google. In 2010, Google announced it would give the Khan Academy $2 million for creating more courses and for translating the core library into the world’s most widely spoken languages, as part of their Project 10100.[10] In 2013, the Mexico-based Carlos Slim Foundation made a donation to Khan Academy to expand its Spanish library of videos.[11]
In the beginning, Khan Academy offered videos mostly about mathematics. Thanks to donations, Khan Academy has been able to expand its faculty and offer courses abouthistory, healthcare, medicine, finance, physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, cosmology, American civics, art history, economics, music, and computer science.[6][12][13] In addition to faculty, the organization has a network of content specialists.[14]
Khan Academy also has thousands of resources translated into other languages. It launched the Spanish version of the website in September 2013.[15] It is supported by partners and volunteers in languages including Indonesian, German, Spanish, Czech, French, Italian, Swahili, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Turkish, Xhosa, Greek, Bulgarian,Ukrainian, Urdu, Arabic, Persian, Bengali, Hindi, Malayalam, and Chinese. Khan Academy also has a Brazilian Portuguese version of its website.[16] As of June 2014, Khan Academy's website has been translated to 23 languages and its videos to 65.[2][3]
"DU will be offering a series of MOOC which will be open and accessible to everyone across the globe. The courses will be free of cost," said Malay Neerav, Media Coordinator and Joint Dean of Students Welfare, Delhi University. "The first course in the series will be 'India in 21st century'. It will include 10 lectures all of which will be delivered by Vice Chancellor Dinesh Singh himself," he added. "The first MOOC will kickstart from January 30. The enrolments for the course .. Read more at:http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/45955770.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
The think piece highlights that with the increase in access to information, and production of knowledge (both underpinned by technology), there is a questioning of the very notions of the authority of traditional bodies of knowledge controlled by legitimate educational institutions. Mobiles provide a new, and sometimes only, access channel to the internet for many people.
With the acceptance of the smartphone as the truly personal computer of choice for most Americans, it stands to reason that educators should be modeling and mentoring its use for the very skills we are touting as "21st century." A digitally literate culture in a technology-driven society should be teaching its children how to use the devices of choice to access, curate, communicate, collaborate with and create information. Content is now accessible anywhere at any time. What to do with it when accessed is what we need to teach.
Educators no longer have the luxury of determining what content kids will be exposed to. Mobile devices have enabled kids to determine that on their own. Educators need to view smartphones not as a distraction to learning, but as an accelerator. Students can use their personal devices to personalize their learning. They can determine on their own what they want to learn without being in a classroom. The where and when about using these devices may need to be worked out for effectiveness in an academic setting, but banning should no longer be tolerated by communities demanding a relevant education for their children.
With the acceptance of the smartphone as the truly personal computer of choice for most Americans, it stands to reason that educators should be modeling and mentoring its use for the very skills we are touting as "21st century." A digitally literate culture in a technology-driven society should be teaching its children how to use the devices of choice to access, curate, communicate, collaborate with and create information. Content is now accessible anywhere at any time. What to do with it when accessed is what we need to teach.
Educators no longer have the luxury of determining what content kids will be exposed to. Mobile devices have enabled kids to determine that on their own. Educators need to view smartphones not as a distraction to learning, but as an accelerator. Students can use their personal devices to personalize their learning. They can determine on their own what they want to learn without being in a classroom. The where and when about using these devices may need to be worked out for effectiveness in an academic setting, but banning should no longer be tolerated by communities demanding a relevant education for their children.