The document discusses challenges facing Ayurveda education in India and proposes ways to improve it. Key issues include many students who fail to get into MBBS programs joining Ayurveda instead, resulting in wasted years; Ayurveda programs not providing enough practical exposure or eligibility for further education; and a huge gap between good and poor institutions, with some maintaining fake patient records. Suggested reforms are introducing evidence-based policymaking; allowing research that follows Ayurveda principles; showcasing success stories; promoting specialization; integrating Ayurveda into mainstream medical education; and ensuring quality and competence of teachers and programs.
2. Current
Status
Good students
prefer MBBS
After 2 to 4 failures,
they join Ayurveda
programs
Loss of
approximately 200
human years per
batch/per college
200 colleges x 200 =
40,000 youthful
human years are
wasted every year!
Can we afford this
as a society?
3. Ayurveda
programs are
a ‘dead end’:
no escape!
Application-
based
exposure is
minimum
Basic scientists
do not teach
them
physiology/
biochemistry/
genetics/
molecular
biology
Not eligible for
MSc / PhD in
Biochemistry /
Physiology/
Pharmacology/
Biotechnology
No
curriculum-
based
standard
textbooks
that include
recent
advances
4. Huge Gap
• Good institutions are often unable to
maintain patient records because of
patient overload
• Poor ones maintain fake patient
records as there are no patients!
• Corruption: Menace of ghost teachers
and ghost students
7. Show
Success
Stories
Allow the institutions to invite
successful practitioners to teach
Ayurveda students/ teachers.
Let students and teachers interact
with successful researchers,
entrepreneurs and clinicians
8. Explore
• Faculty sharing among the
institutions
• Legally allow them to teach in
multiple institutions
9. Specialization
and
Skill-Based
Education
Introduce
DM/MCh/DNB in
• Ayurveda Neurology
• Ayurveda Cardiology
• Ayurveda
Endocrinology
• Ayurveda
Reproductive
Medicine
• AyurvedaTertiary
Care specialists etc.
Regulate Skill-based
Programs
• Ayurveda Nursing /
• Panchakarma
Therapist
• Ayurveda
Pharmacist
• AyurvedaVeterinary
Physician/ Ayurveda
Dietitian
• Ayurveda
Agriculture/ Farming
10. • AYUSH Module in MBBS curriculum
• Introduce goodTeachers’Training Programs
• Faculty training institute?
Sensitize
• Merge some Ayurveda colleges with existing state/central
universities
Merge
• Introduce periodic licentiate examinations for renewal of
license
Ensure Quality
• Introduce NET/GATE like examination for ensuring teachers’
eligibility
Ensure Competence
11. Explore on experimental basis
• Integrated 10-year BAMS/MBBS/MD(Ay)/PhD
degree
• Have a common course content for first 2-3
years for all medical graduates irrespective of
their streams. Specialization only after basic
common training
Every year I undertake this small exercise in the first class of newly admitted graduate students in our institution. I ask them to tell me the number of years they spent in preparation for the pre-medical entrance test before joining Ayurveda. Usually they admit that each student has spent anywhere from 2 to 4 years in preparation for NEET/Pre-Medical Entrance Test. In a batch of 60 it amounts to a total of about 200 years. This is the number of human years wasted in preparation which could have been otherwise productive. Now, let us extend this calculation to about 200 colleges in India. The total number of human years wasted amounts to about 40,000. Remember: this number is for one year. My question is: Can we afford this as a country and as a society? Our most intelligent youth waste these many years in preparation!
CCIM has recently proposed to include many elective subjects to be introduced during BAMS. It has been proposed that completing at least 3 such subjects will be made mandatory during one phase of the program. So a student would have some training in around 9-10 subjects at the end of the BAMS program. This is a positive change.