Capitalism, Liberalism And Marxism Leninism

Capitalism, Liberalism And Marxism Leninism
Since the dawning of man and the discovery of wealth there has been one large question to concept of wealth; how do I get more? In the world of
economics there are several theories and approaches but the three main powerhouses that have either stood the test of time or paved the way for
economic revolutions are Mercantilism, Liberalism and Marxism–Leninism. Each of these economic theories have great strengths in their own rights
but are of course not without great limitations. While there is no such thing as an inherently perfect economic and political system it is quite
obvious that some come closer to the mark than others. Mercantilism has been nicknamed the economics of absolution. Mercantilism is the theory
that a countries power depends mainly on its wealth, the power to build large and formidable navies and lastly the control and purchase of vital
trade goods and routes. The two main ways to increase a countries wealth is to obtain as much gold and silver as possible and to establish a
favorable balance of trade that sells more goods than it has to buy. In Mercantilism buying more than you are selling will lead to an unfavorable
balance which will lead to a national dept. Europe in early history utilized mercantilism which lead to the creation of colonies. The soul purpose of a
colony is to support and benefit the mother country. A good example of this is North America, North America had untapped raw resources such as
minerals, metals and trees; it is worth noting
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Communism : A Theory Or System Of Social Organization
Communism Communism is a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed
to the community as a whole or to the state. The word 'communism' derived from Latin word 'communis' which means common, universal. ( Dictionary
Reference– Communism) In the 1840s, a German philosopher named Karl Marx published books that talking about Marxism which is known as
communism nowadays. Marx said class struggle is a problem of the society. Marx founded the Communist Correspondence Committee in 1846.
Their plan was to try and link socialist who live in different part of Europe. In this time many socialist leaders were influenced by Marxism. This is
the begging of the communism. The concept of Marxism is socialism versus nationalism. Nationalism is based on ownership of property; however
socialism is control and management of property by society. Marxism is based on socialism which property is controlled by society. Communism's
most important goal is reaching utopia. Utopia is made by Thomas More in 1516. It is a combination of Greek 'ОµбЅ–' which mean 'good' and
'П„ПЊПЂОїП‚' which mean 'place'. So utopia mean 'good place'. But nowadays' standard usage describes utopia as non–existing society that is much
better than the society which we are living right now. Thomas More's book, 'Utopia', describes how utopia really looks like. In the book, 'utopia',
There are 100, 0000 people living in this island. And there is no money

The Three Causes Of The Russian Revolution
The Russian Revolution started in 1905 through 1917. It happened because there were a series of revolution that started in 1905, including the bloody
sunday. This name was because priest disagreed that workers had no rights to he went to Czar's house and just started shooting everywhere. Russian
revolution had five or six causes we have three really important causes. We had the weakness ofRussia, the World War one, the mistakes of Tsar's,
Army abandoned the Tsar, Duma abandoned Tsars, but the most important of the five reasons of the Russian Revolution was that the People of
Russia didn't want an absolute monarchy. Russia for a long time had absolute monarchism until Nicholas the second that was the last Czars of
Russia, and wasn't kings and queens the had the Czars and the Czars had absolute power in Russia. What do you think it's going to happen? I will give
you a clue it was a really bloody war.
Bloody Sunday was one of the reason of the Russian Revolution to happen. So the bloody Sunday was when demonstrators without guns or any object
like that were attacked by soldiers of the Imperial Guards when they were marching to the Winter Palace. Another reason was the Duma. At the October
Manifesto that was a response that he made lots of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
World War one was a disaster more than 17 million people died in World War one and the worst thing of it is that the Czar Nicholas the second
thought that war would benefit him. He thought that people that was born in Russia and defend another country would come back running to him and
he would be the great leader. So, after all, he became commander of the army. Russian situation starts getting worst and worst. They couldn't get
supplies so they started running out of food, and know the food is more and more expensive. It was just chaotic, more than two million people died
during this

The Cold War A New History Summary
Gaddis, John. The Cold War A New History. New York: Penguin Group, 2005. Print. John Gaddis is a professor at the University of Yale. Gaddis field
of interest are the "U.S Cold War history; Historical methodology; Biography; Grand Strategy (Yale University." John Gaddis. http://history.yale.edu
/people/john–gaddis). Since his field of interest is in the U.S Cold War history, he wrote a book about it by the name of The Cold War A New
History. Gaddis's book is written for his undergraduate Yale students that he lectures to every Monday and Wednesday afternoon. His real purpose in
this book is to make his Yale undergraduates understand what the Cold War was since "hardly any of them remember any of the events I'm (he is)
describing"(preface).... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It makes it confusing to understand what Gaddis is writing about when he does not go in chronological order with the order of the events and how they
happened. In chapter four on pages 124– 125 for example, Gaddis goes from speaking about non–alignment to Joseph Stalin's death then to
immediately speaking of Nikita Khrushchev and how he admire Stalin then back to Stalin and how did things in Germany then again back to
Khrushchev on how he planned to rule Germany. Then Gaddis jumps into China talking about Mao Zedong. This jumping form one rules to
another then back to a different ruler in a different country is what made it hard for this book reviewer to understand the content of each chapter.
Gaddis does the jumping form different leaders, different events, and the order of the events through out the entire chapters of the book. The only
part of the book that Gaddis effectively went into chronological order is the pictures he puts in chapter five. These pictures show how the U.S. and
German troops meet, then the meeting of Winston Churchill, Harry S. Truman, and Stalin, then the testing of the thermonuclear weapons and the
atomic bomb was tested, then the Berlin Wall in 1961 showing the difference between East Berlin and West Berlin, and then how Fidel Castro
threatened John F. Kennedy with the Cuban Missile Crisis. The order of the pictures reflects how it actually happened in history. The way Gaddis
explains in the chapter does not. This book reviewer feels the only reason Gaddis put the pictures of events in chronological order is because he
knew he was writing all over the place on how the events happened. If Gaddis were to start his book over, go in chronological order of the events and
the exact way they happened, this book would be a hundred times easier to understand and

Vladimir Lenin Research Paper
Vladimir Lenin
Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, better known as simply Lenin, was a Russian revolutionary leader and founder of the Soviet Union and the
Marxism–Leninism political ideology. He was born on April 22, 1870 in Ulyanovsk, a very small town in a western–central district in the Russian
Empire. He was the third of six children of a Russu–German couple, some of which ended up initiating controversial political stir–ups against the Tsar
at the time.
Growing up, he and his family, like most Russians, were not very favourable of the Tsar Nicholas II. The Tsar's rule was nothing to them but a
hipocratic dictatorship regime which focussed more on opression and battling democracy than on developing the Russian Empire as a whole. Russians,
who only recently were freed from feudalism, were struct by their version of the Industrial ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Balshaviks win the war and founded the Soviet Union. Russia was devistated after the war since not only did over 8 million people died during
the war, the nation was plagued with famine and inflation. Lenin proposes the New Economic Policy, allowing farmers to sell their crops, and dies
shortly afterwards in January 21, 1924.
Lenin was, even decades after his death, the icon of the Soviet Union. Infact, when he died, over 300,000 Russians lined up to see his mummified
body in what was one of the world's largest and longest funerals, lasting over five days. The Soviet people loved Lenin as after hundreds of years of
oppression from the Tsars, he was the one who freed them and created the modern Communist views of Leninism. Over the course of Soviet history,
statues of Lenin were built in every city in Russia, pictures of him were painted in every school and the Soviets went as far as to deploy a picture of
Lenin as a child into

Western Civilization And Its Impact On The Wider World
Western civilization has had an enormous outsize impact on the wider world in the last two centuries, primarily through spreading western ideas and
assumptions about society. The source of the capability of these western civilizations to impact other regions of the world comes from their political
philosophies. The two political philosophies that have allowed western civilizations to have such an impact are Leninism and liberalism. Both of these
political philosophies generate immense power for a nation, albeit liberalism generates power much slower than Leninism. It was these political
philosophies that allowed Europe and the United States to develop into super powers capable of establishing dominance around the globe.
Another major source of this capability of powerful European nations to dominate the globe comes from the traditional nature of the regions they
colonized. While Europe was developing strong governments and institutions, much of the rest of the world was still agricultural and had little to no
development in terms of government. This is particularly true in Africa; the native people were loosely associated and couldn't form strong nations or
allyships to protect themselves and each other.
Perhaps as important as the capability of domination is the motivation for it; European imperialists sought colonization for a variety of reasons, the
most important being natural resources. The need for raw materials and natural resources goes hand in hand with

Marxism and Communism Christian Communism
Introduction
Communism is a social structure in which classes are abolished and property is commonly controlled, as well as a political philosophy and social
movement that advocates and aims to create such a society.Karl Marx, the father of communist thought, posited that communism would be the final
stage in society, which would be achieved through a proletarian revolution and only possible after a socialist stage develops the productive forces,
leading to a superabundance of goods and services.
"Pure communism" in the Marxian sense refers to a classless, stateless and oppression–free society where decisions on what to produce and what
policies to pursue are made democratically, allowing every member of society to participate in the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Other writers described by Marx as "utopian socialists" included Saint–Simon.
In its modern form, communism grew out of the socialist movement of 19th century Europe.[citation needed] As the Industrial Revolution advanced,
socialist critics blamed capitalism for the misery of the proletariat – a new class of urban factory workers who labored under often–hazardous
conditions. Foremost among these critics were the German philosopher Karl Marx and his associate Friedrich Engels. In 1848, Marx and Engels
offered a new definition of communism and popularized the term in their famous pamphlet The Communist Manifesto.Engels, who lived in
Manchester, observed the organization of the Chartist movement (see History of British socialism), while Marx departed from his university comrades
to meet the proletariat in France and Germany.
Growth of modern communism
In the late 19th century, Russian Marxism developed a distinct character. The first major figure of Russian Marxism was Georgi Plekhanov.
Underlying the work of Plekhanov was the assumption that Russia, less urbanized and industrialized than Western Europe, had many years to go
before society would be ready for

A Look at Prominent Worldviews
James W. Sire claimed that world view is "...a set of presuppositions... which we hold... about the makeup of our world." As of me, my definition
does not deviate much. World view is the way, either supported or unsupported, how I see what I see. It's like glasses where I see everything
through the filter of glasses. Supposedly, world view can affect one very much. The fact that Muslims goes to Mecca or Christians going to church
every week or the mere choice between chocolate bar and ice cream are all affected by world view. The Christian world view bases everything to the
scripture, the Bible. Christians say that humans are innately evil because Adam and Eve were kicked out from the Garden of Eden. Christians also
emphasizes that it is only... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Morality of secular humanism is pretty low considering the fact that they are moral relativists who thinks each person has their own sets of ethical
system. It is pretty stupid that they even called moral relativism considered as one of moral categories since it's like an oxymoron, if everyone thinks
differently, how is there morality? Who can justify morality? Secular humanists also think that evolution is a fact. The fact that carbon dating and
observation of rock layers made them believe that earth is very old which gives more credit to evolution. They try to impose evolution on every world
views and people. Marxist–Leninists holds communistic world view. Their main belief is that everyone should be equal and capitalism is evil in its
very nature. Theologically speaking, they are very atheistic; rather, they hate the idea of supernaturalism itself. They think super naturalistic events
cannot be put under control and thus is unneeded in the fair and equal society of proletariats. Philosophy of Marxist–Leninist is very special. They say
that synthesis from thesis and antithesis is their philosophy. This means there will always be a thesis that is challenged by a antithesis and synthesis
occurs to merge thesis and antithesis. The outcome will then become thesis and meet another antithesis. Proletariat morality is moral system of Marxist
–Leninism which basically says if the action was for the

Marxism Impact On Russia
The system that pushed towards an equal society, know as Marxism, was a very monumental and important philosophy that eventually diffused across
the globe during the 20th century. It was, in fact, developed in the late 1800's, but it wasn't popular until the 1900's. Although the majority ofMarxism
fell along with the USSR and China during the Cold War, parts of it began to distribute across Asia and even America through high amounts of
supporters, war, and religious support.
Despite the negativity towards Marxism in America, the philosophy became widely used; even some the the US constitution. The oblivious Americans
believed that the Soviet Union was destroyed, however, Marxism, at least a weaker form of it, was still active. The Marxist people pushed toward
socialism and equality thought the working class which ultimately began revolutions. The socialist revolution began the peak of socialism in America
but caused a struggle between the working class and the rich. Later on, The Communist Manifesto, a book written by Karl Marx himself, describes the
ten program points, the prediction ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The most powerful and influential form of communism to this date called Marxism–Leninism. The origin of this newly developed philosophy is
Russia, which made a great impact. The main ways that Marxism–Leninism effected the Russian society was through the Communist party, the role of
working class people, and the perception of modern capitalism as imperialism. After the integration of Marxism–Leninism in Russia, the people fell
into order in the beginning but later fell into chaos at the fall of the USSR similar to the Communist revolution in China. The Chinese Communist
revolution was similar to the fall of the USSR as China made the mistake of pressuring the the people into Marxism which resulted in Communist
revolutions and fell during the Cold

Socialism Thesis
PART I: Topic overview & annotated guiding research
I choose to research Socialism, because of a man by the name of Bernie Sanders who seeks to become the next President of the United States. I wanted
to know how socialism helps the common working man and why it has negative connotations, but the positivity it really has. My questions are: What is
Democratic Socialism? How has Democratic Socialism worked in a government? Why does Democratic Socialism bring negative connotations? How
has Democratic Socialism affected America?
PART II: Thesis & setting up the conversation
In the discussion of Democratic Socialism. One controversial issue has been that socialism is the greatest threat to America and even the world, but is
that true? On one ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Puschak goes into great detail the advantages of what a democratic socialist country entail, those being housing, food, healthcare, and education.
Puschak gave a great example of Finland's socialist education, by stating that everyone is given the same opportunity to succeed or fail regardless if
their socioeconomic status. Puschak's view on socialism was really surprising, and in fact gave me some good points to use. He also did a really good
job at what democratic socialism brings, as well as what Marxism–Leninism socialism brings. Lastly, Puschak ending analogy was perfect, it presented
the basic misinterpretation that everyone has, and exposed

The Juche Ideology of North Korea Essay
Ideology can be looked at different perspectives of the way people think about it. Some people think that ideology is bad, while some people think it
is good. Ideology takes a very harmful way in Christianity; Pope Francis explains to Christians that ideology drives away the church and the people.
In his perspective of mind, ideology is a "serious illness."(Dolan) In some other places such as North Korea, ideology is a "dangerous belief system."
North Koreans Ideology is most commonly referred as "Juche," this ideology is harmful to people because most people would like to praise people
who do good things, but in North Korea people have to pray to a dictator who is capable of killing, torturing, and murdering his own people.
Juche has ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Juche Religion)
Kim Il Sung created this "dangerous belief system" so that North Koreans would always obey him. Before Dictatorship North Korea was an
independent nation, it was a colony full of Christians. Kim Il Sung noticed how Christians worshipped the Japanese ruler who ruled Korea. When
North Korea declared as a country, Kim Il Sung changed the form of Christianity and he declared himself as a God so that North Korea will always
praise and pray him. Christians revolted against this, so Kim Il Sung annihilated most of them because he did not want his own people suspecting him
of Juche and put lots of people in concentration camps and they still reside there. (Juche Religion) Juche originated from Marxism–Leninism.
Marxism–Leninism was created by Karl Marx, some of the main points in this ideology are that a communist party should be able to perform and play
major roles in society. Some other beliefs in Marxism–Leninism are that modern capitalism should turn into imperialism. (Piskunov) North Korea
gained inspiration from Marxism–Leninism, which is why this ideology is one of the main ideologies that Juche originated. Some other ideologies
that Juche originated were Confucianism. Confucianism was developed in China by a man named Kong Qiu (Confucius). Kong Qiu travelled across
the country to spread his teachings, but at that time his beliefs was not popular and some of his beliefs were how to do the right things in life. He

Post Korean War Relations And The Rise Of The People 's...
Post Korean War Relations and the Rise of the People's Republic of China
The Korean War was able to develop the People's Republic of China as a major up and coming nation. The mid 1950s saw the rise of Chinese
agricultural collectivization, making them an influential power in the world. With the country improving every year that passes, Mao wanted to move
in the direction of Socialism, but was worried that those in the CCP were restricting him on making that leap. In a statement in 1957, Mao claimed that
the Imperialist nations, like the United States, are more afraid of Socialist nations than the other way around (p.198). Mao shows how the transition
into Socialism has created increased tension between Sino–Soviet relations. He states, "At present there exists some controversies between Chine and
the Soviet Union. Their ways of thinking, behavior, and historical traditions differ from ours" (p.198). This was the first public statement made by the
Chinese that distanced themselves away from Soviet authority. Mao's response to these differences is that they must try to persuade them. He says that
there are differences within the Communist party, and that many of those different ideas are on par with what he wants to bring using Socialism
(p.199). As Mao became more powerful, and people started buying into his system more and more, he was able to implement his first major plan of the
Chinese Revolution: The Great Leap Forward. As this plan got major attention within China

Communism In North Korea
There are many different types of political systems in the world today, some good, others not so much. Many countries go through different political
systems before they reach a good fit. In this paper I choose to research about a regime that has always interested me, communism. To a lot of people
communism holds negative connotations but the history behind this form of governance is one of desperation and revolution. Communism is a socialist
movement to create a classless, moneyless, and stateless social order which is structured upon ownership of the means of production, as well as a
social, political and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of this social order. (wiki.) Communism first came about as a theory of how to
balance ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Leninists pushed for a creation of a Vanguard Party to help lead the working class revolution to victory. Many believed that the workers would not be
able to organize and develop a socialist conscience without the guidance of the Vanguard party.Marxism–Leninism is a mixture of the two that was
first adopted by the Soviet Union; it is the most prevalent form of communism around the world today. North Korea's leader Kim Il–Sung developed a
political doctrine called Juche in 1955. This doctrine's main emphasis was military and economic self–reliance that was inspired by Marxism–Leninism.
Communism in Modern Days was largely formed out of the socialist movement of 19th century Europe. One could say that communist thoughts
came about once people were tired of the capitalistic society they were living in. Now to take a closer look at communism as it pertains to one
country, North Korea. In the early 20th century communism developed as a political movement in Korea. Over time, South Korea made communism
illegal, but North Korea continued to be a Juche Socialist State under the Workers Party of Korea. The creation of communist North Korea can be
linked back to Alexandra Kim, a Korean living in Russia in 1916. She has been credited as being the first Korean communist because while in Russia
she joined the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party (Bolsheviks). When Lenin sent her Khabarovsk to be in charge of external affairs she met with Yi

What Was The Soviet Union Essay
Today, Russia is one of the world's great powers Russia is the seventh largest economy in the world by GDP, sixth in terms of purchasing power, and
third in terms of military budget. Russia is one of the only five recognized nuclear weapons countries in the world, and having the largest arsenal of
weapons of mass destruction. Russia is a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. It is also a member of the Group of Eight, the
Group of Twenty, the Council of Europe, the Asia
–Pacific Economic Cooperation, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe. However, to be with this power was not an easy for Russia which was the Soviet Union. Russia has a long of
history which is full ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Anyone tried to revolt against his regime would be punished. For example, Because of anti–government views, many churches were deprived of the
legal rights and subjected to repression and oppression. In 1925, the Patriarch was imprisoned and killed by an order of the government of Stalin
government. Later, when the new Patriarch used a new system that approved the rule of Stalin.
Stalin protected the church and left them in peace. Also, Stalin, like Lenin, believes that all industries must remain in the hands of the state. Stalin
was less liberal than Lenin. through Lenin system, some farmers were allowed to keep their land and some companies to remain private. By
contrast, Stalin had all agriculture to be under state control and forced farmers to work for state farms. Stalin seized agricultural land from the
peasants and replaced the Bolshevik farming system with cooperative farming. This step brought the peasants back to slavery, as they did during
Caesarean rule. In addition, Stalin began to increase the pace of industry as well, which was a huge success at first, but over time caused the deaths of
millions and caused severe damage to the environment. Any attempt to resist Many people were deported to or executed in Siberia labor camps.
Historians recorded Stalinist regime. Stalinism is the Stalin's political with economic, social principles, and policies associated. It depended on the
development of

Roy Medvedev Analysis
With the destruction of the Tsarist regime, Russia stood at a crossroads no state had ever been at. For the first time ever, a Socialist nation advocating
Communism had managed to create a functioning state. The works of Marx and Engels, pushed forth as the cure for the oppression of the proletariat,
had fallen successfully on the ears of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, who, with his theory of the Vanguard party, pushed the Russian Empire into the Soviet era.
Leninism became the central tenant of the Soviet system, being advocated and admired by every successive Soviet leader, and by many in modern
Russia to this day. The modernity of the issue leads many in modern Russia to justify certain actions, harkening back to Lenin himself, still displayed in
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The virtues of one are inherently found in the other, the downfalls of one, inherently found in the other as well. Lenin's own realization of this near the
end of his life, his insistence on trying to prevent any one man from taking power in the USSR, proves that while attempting to prevent Stalinism,
Lenin's own foundational government set the path for it. Leninism was naturally led to Stalinism, and that must be addressed lest it be used to justify,
misleadingly, the same once

Nothing To Be Jealous By Barbara Demick
Nothing to Envy – Correspondent for the Los Angeles Times in Seoul, the capital of South Korea, between 2001 and 2006, American journalist
Barbara Demick researched documents, photos, and videos and interviewed North Korean dissidents and refugees who had fled to a South Korea or to
China. Punctuated by general information about a country's economy and culture, such as 'Nothing to be Jealous' stories intertwine to form a rather
vivid panel on Kim Il–sung's (1912–94) and Kim Jong–il (1942) –2011), father and son who reigned absolute for more than six decades and still
perpetuate their authoritative legacy in the figure of heir Kim Jong–un. One of the book's virtues is to show how the cult of the personality of tyrants
was forged in the peculiar

Lenin Followed Marxism, Stalin Did Not Essay
Marxism was defined by a man named Karl Marx and his associate Fredrich Engels. Basically, Marxism is defined as a conflict theory, as Marx said
that society is separated by a conflict between the rich and the poor. Today, when one thinks about Marx's philosophy, he is often tied as an enemy to
Capitalism due to his ties to Communism. Although he did layout the foundry to Communism as we know it, he never saw it to be how it is today.
He saw it as a way for social egalitarianism; Equality for the poor and rich (the Proletariat and Bourgeoisie); a classless society. He wanted to the big
businesses and factories not to be owned by one man or company as in capitalism, but to be owned by everyone. A concept he called Collective... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lenin's side was known as the "Reds". The Reds won after a bloody war. The campaign became known as the "Red Terror", due to the murders of
thousands of Russian peasants, and the use of thousands more of these peasants or members of the White army into concentration camps as
"enemies of the revolution." Lenin caused a terrible Famine in 1921 when his economic innovations began to take place. By 1922, Lenin was the
ruler Russia, He also eventually Russia into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics or the USSR. He died on January 21, 1924 due to a series of
strokes that would eventually kill him. He was followed by a man known as Joseph Stalin; the bloodiest man of WWII who would make Hitler
look like a playground bully. Joseph Stalin born into a Osif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili. He was born into an abusive family, and later left to
study at the Tiflis Theological Seminary. He Later left to become a fellow Marxist revolutionist. He was exiled six times into Siberia and six times
which he escaped due his contributions in being a Bolshevik revolutionist. He often led strikes and riots against local authorities. He became one of
the Bolshevik's key contributors, and rose to power by taking out who was above him. Lenin before he died saw Stalin as a threat and proposed to
remove him of power, a proposal which was denied. Stalin along the way of becoming this brute, he changed him name to Stalin, or "Steel–one"
followed by the "lin" referring to

Popular political Ideologies in the 20th Century: A brief...
POLITICAL SCIENCE 101
Popular political Ideologies in the 20th Century
A brief Study of popular 20th Century political trends.
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document
here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]
Political ideologies (P.I) have existed since the dawn of human Civilization; they have been fought over, discredited, re–approached, and fought over
again. Many exist and have been tried over thousands of years. Still the question that plagues humanity is, how best do we manage governmental
affairs? It is best to understand that different political ideologies ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The main thrust of the theory is that everyone was to work to their abilities, and everyone would receive to their needs. The linchpin of this theory,
however; was that it must occur in an already well industrialized nation. Leninism/Stalinism takes the Marxist model and adjusts it slightly to take a
non–industrialized nation into modernity while simultaneously creating the "workers eutopia" Lenin and Stalin did this mainly by force but Lenin also
achieved this by using a quasi–capitalism called "The new economic policy". Classic liberalism/Capitalism finds its roots with the age of enlightenment
and the emergence of the United States of America. The economic driving force behind Classic liberalism is capitalism. The idea that economies grow
and nations become powerful with minimal government involvement. Central to this theme is the idea of free trade between private parties. Classic
liberalism relies also heavily individual rights and freedoms, an individual free to live as they please with minimal government involvement.
Progressivism/Socialism is an attempt to lightly combine the idea's of Marxism and classic liberalism. With heavy reliance on government regulation
the idea is to manage a capitalist economy in order to evenly distribute goods and service's equally to a nation's populace. There is also a strong
tendency for socialist nation to be very liberal in the social sense as well. Many types of deviant behaviors are considered to be be more

The Chinese Communist Party
Setting the Scene: China had experienced a turbulent century prior to the Communist Party taking power. It has a long Confucius heritage but was
plagued by foreign imperialism, weak governments, Japanese invasion and civil war until 1949. Mao and the Communist Party sought to transform
China into a Communist society following the ideology of Marxist–Leninism. They established measures to transform China into a totalitarian state.
This required the Communist Party to have complete power and control over the population. I am researching how the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) gained this power and control during their first decade in charge. This question is very significant to understanding change in Modern China.
Historians Points of View Historians have different views on how the CCP exerted power and control over the population. Many writers between
1955–2000 including William Hinton, an American writer on China argue that China had been so damaged by the Japanese and the Civil War that the
people just welcomed peace. They welcomed the Communist victory as a return the country to order and many looked forward to more fairness in how
things were done after the corruption of the past. Therefore he concludes that initially most people cooperated willingly with Communist rule. Jung
Chang and Jon Halliday– Author Jung Chang and Jon Halliday do not accept the uncompromising justifications for Mao's rise to power. Chang
described Mao as a dictator who manipulated everyone

Similarities Between Marxism And Leninism
Leninism is used to describe the strategy, devised by Lenin (and others), that insisted that a revolution would not come about through the collapse of
capitalism under the stress of its own contradictions, and instead, should be brought about by a 'vanguard party' of intellectuals acting on behalf of a
proletariat that had not (and might not ever) achieve consciousness. So, it's a major revision of the most austere parts of Marx's prognosis of
capitalism, and a theory about how to acquire and retain control of the state. Marxism–Leninism was the term used by apparatchiks and intellectuals in
the Communist Party of the Soviet Union to describe the ideology they followed. Of course, this ideology changed all the time, so it was an elastic
term. At separate times, different policies would comprise Marxism–Leninism. It wasn't one idea or approach.
Most Communist parties today continue to regard Marxism–Leninism as their basic ideology, although many have modified it to adapt to new political
conditions. However, several parties, especially those previously associated with Eurocommunism, have distanced themselves from Leninism and in
many cases omitted it from their official documents. Some have started identifying themselves as "Marxist and Leninist" rather than "Marxist–Leninist."
Marxism– Leninism influenced Russia as the Bolsheviks could take over the Russian state following the October Revolution and tightened that control
during the Russian Civil War. Lenin authorized the

Henry Kissinger : The United States Foreign Policy,...
Introduction Henry Kissinger is one of the most extraordinary figures in the United States foreign policy. Under the Nixon's administration, Kissinger
served as a National Security Advisor and then as a Secretary of State. He was one of the few American diplomats who has known China intimately.
Based off of his personal recollections of the Chinese leaders during his visit as well as other historical records, Kissinger was able to investigate how
the Chinese leaders approach diplomacy, strategy, and negotiations with other countries during the 20th century. OnChina, written by Kissinger
provides analysis and historical context of Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, and Deng Xiaoping. With those analyses, Kissing was able to reflect on the
consequences for the global balance of power in the 21st century. This paper will review Kissinger's text as well as his main arguments, and will
evaluate the quality of Kissinger's arguments and focus on any areas of weakness within the book.
Summary
China's history continues to shape its contemporary thinking, foreign policy and diplomacy with the West. In order to understand China's politics and
its civilization in general, it is important to look into its history and its traditional philosophy. This book examined many key events in Chinese
foreign policy from the classical era to the present day, with an emphasis on the decades after the rise of Mao Zedong. The Chinese's response and its
approach to diplomacy and foreign policy were seen

Vladimir Lenin: Founding Father Of The Soviet Union
Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, better known as his alias, Vladimir Lenin or even as simply as Lenin, was an influential and highly significant Communist
revolutionary and political theorist turned politician during the early twentieth century. Greatly acknowledged as the spearing head of Russia's
Communist movement, Lenin became the main founding father of the Soviet Union through his lead of the October Revolution of 1917 as the head of
the Bolsheviks. But, gaining followers and forming a new government involved solidifying a political philosophy in order to effectively create any real
social or political change. Lenin's own political philosophy evolution began with his exposure to liberal radicalism against Tsar Alexander II. Through
thorough ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He truly understood his interpretation of Marx as the only concretely practical and effective version. Lenin strived for an eventual wholly communist
society within Russia that resulted from his Bolshevik revolution and thus, creation of the Soviet Union. Lenin's evolution of political philosophy
became the complete adoption of Marxism and developed to instilling a belief that it was Lenin's moral conviction to implement Marxist theory to the

The Major Cause Of The Russian Revolution
In 1917, there were many major world events going on. World War I was under place and had been since 1914. There were civil rights movements in
the United States. A worldwide influenza epidemic had broken out. The Chicago White Sox won the world series against the New York Giants.
During the year 1917, there was also a major revolution in Russia. The people of Russia split themselves into several political groups, all fighting over
how the government should be run. One of these groups was the Bolshevik party. They were a communist party and ended up taking over Russia by
the end of the revolution. For the revolution to begin and finally end with a communist power in Russia, there needed to be causes. The three major
causes of the Russian Revolution were Russia's participation in World War I, an unstable government andVladimir Lenin. The first factor that led to
the 1917 Russian Revolution and the communist government that followed was Russia's participation in World War I. When Russia first entered the
war in 1914, they were confident, but their economy and political and social states were not doing well enough to sustain a war. At the time, Czar
Nicholas Romanov II was the leader of Russia. Russia had an autocracy for a government, which meant Nicholas had all the power. He appointed his
cousin, Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich, to be the commander–in–chief of the Russian army for World War I. Nikolaevich had never been a
commander before, but Nicholas still chose him

The Progression from Leninism to Stalinism Essay
The question of whether or not Stalinism was a logical continuation of Leninism is a difficult one. Stalinism did take significantly more drastic
measures than Leninism did. There were differences in policy. But in spite of these, Stalinism still found its basis in Leninism. Even Trotsky, a friend
of Lenin and a staunch opponent of Stalin, grudgingly admits that "Stalinism did issue from Bolshevism" (Trotsky). Stalin's policy of socialism in one
country, his use of terror to eliminate opposition, and his suppression of democracy and the soviets were all characteristics of Lenin well before they
were characteristic of Stalin. Although some of Stalin's policies were different from those of Lenin, what difference Stalinism did... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition to a focus on socialism only within his own country, Stalin also focused on a concentration of governmental control of industry and
agriculture. This policy, originated by Lenin under the moniker of state capitalism, was a clearly established goal of Leninism well before Stalin
implemented it. Lenin said that "Socialism is nothing but state capitalist monopoly made to benefit the whole people" ("How Lenin Led to Stalin").
It is clear that his idea of socialism was one of governmental economic control. Moreover, Lenin fully intended for this plan to be implemented. He
said that "If we introduced state capitalism in approximately 6 months' time we would achieve a great success" ("How Lenin Led to Stalin"). As the
government gained more and more control over the economy, Lenin felt it necessary to defend his actions. He published an article in April of 1918 in
which he stated that "Unquestioning submission to a single will is absolutely necessary for the success of the labor process...the revolution demands,
in the interests of socialism, that the masses unquestioningly obey the single will of the leaders of the labor process" ("How Lenin Led to Stalin"). In
addition to demonstrating the Leninist ideal of state capitalism, it also shows that Lenin viewed absolute governmental authority as necessary, a policy

The Ideological Content And Violent Practices Of Stalinism...
To what extent were the ideological content and violent practices of Stalinism consisted with Leninist principles?
This essay will examine the extent to which the political phenomena know as Stalinism was a derivative of Leninist principle. Stalinism being defined
as the governing polices implemented under the leadership of Joseph Stalin, particularly during the period between the end of the New Economic
Policy in 1929 and the death of Stalin 1953. These policies were characterised by the use of extreme violence in the form of persistent State terror in
order to achieve social and political ends. Specific examples such as the collectivisation of agriculture and the Great purge of the communist party have
all been attributed to the Stalinist system. Stalinism also places greater priority on the creation of 'socialism in one country' rather than the spreading of
revolution abroad through communist internationalism. The extent to which the Stalinist system was a product of or a degeneration of Leninism has
been intensely debated by historians. Leninism being defined as a form of Marxism where the Bolshevik party would seize power and maintain a
dictatorship through the use of violence, in order for socialism and eventually communism to be created. This essay will seek to explore whether the
violent policies associated with Stalinism where the result of the continuation by Stalin of the processes initiation by Vladimir Lenin under his direction
and whether the intentions of

Karl Marx And Marxism
Karl Marx's ideology was established to show what would happen if the social classes struggled with each other. Vladimir Lenin however, was more
practical in that his ideology carried the changes needed to fit into the country itself. Marx anticipated that his concept would come to carry out a more
advanced capitalist state because is where he thought the revolution he talked about would take place. Still, Leninism took place in a country that was
not as advanced as Mr. Marx would have imagined. During this time Russia was not economically advanced and had many farmers. Lenin felt he had
to change the aspects of Marxism to fit Russia
Lenin argued that the capitalists in European countries engaged in a policy of imperialism, or empire ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In fact, the philosophical basis of the communist movements and regimes of the 20th century, ranging from the Soviet Union to Latin America to
China and North Korea, is largely based on Marxism. However, it's important to note that while Marxism supports a form of socialism, not all forms of
socialism are Marxist in nature.
Lenin, developed a Marxist political economy, enhanced by capitalism, imperialism, and of the general crisis of capitalism. It popularized the idea of
the socialist revolution, the concept of the possibility of the victory of socialism first in a few countries or even in one country alone. The significance
of Marx's theory of liberty is that the rank and file must be directly involved in the socialist revolution against capitalism. "The proletarian movement is
the self–conscious, independent movement of the immense majority in the interest of the immense majority".1
The Bolsheviks subsequently assumed authority before the working class had prepared for Socialism, all the Bolshevik government could do at this
point, was to install state capitalism in Russia. while at the same time imposing their own dictatorship over the proletariat. Distaste for the intellectual
capabilities of the proletariat led to their demand that the leading party should rule on their behalf, much against their

Chinese Communism And The Rise Of Mao By Benjamin Schwartz
Chinese Communism and the Rise of Mao by Benjamin Schwartz:
The content of Chinese Communism and the Rise of Mao by Benjamin Schwartz, published in 1951, focuses on Communism and examines the
presence of Marxism–Leninism among the Chinese, the belief that China was not fit for a revolution or radical change, and the role of students in
leading Chinese revolutions. Chinese Communism offers content of immense value as its purpose aims to emphasize historic and relevant information
which allows the reader to benefit from a more detailed understanding of the sources and progression of communism in China.
Unfortunately, this source also presents limitations in its writing style, as the scholar's vast knowledge presents a struggle for outsiders– ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1962, Mao advocated the Socialist Education Movement, in an attempt to 'inoculate' the peasantry against the temptations of feudalism and the
sprouts of capitalism which he saw re–emerging in the countryside. Moderate members in the party organization disagreed with Mao's "millennial
visions" (Wessinger, 2016, pg.320) and believed they would detract from the success of post–Great Leap Forward economic rehabilitation program. In
response to perceived internal opposition towards Mao, he inundated the Chinese people with thousands of strategically–devised educational posters,
fliers, and messages. It should be noted that there were no legitimate indications that open opposition to Mao was present (Spence, 1990). Personality
cults which fetishsize one person as godly strongly contradict Marxist principles; Karl Marx explicitly stated his contempt for the "cult of the
individual" (Marx). Chinese Communism and the Rise of Mao details that Mao's declaration as a Marxist was contingent upon the social, economic,
and political climate in China at any given time, which allowed him to use Marxism as an umbrella term. Through Schwartz's perspective, Mao is not
exploiting public perception of his leadership style but rather less insultingly misinforming the

Marxism-Leninism in Vietnam Essay
Marxism–Leninism in Vietnam
In the region of Vietnam there had been many uprisings. All of these uprisings were for one reason, freedom. The Vietnamese were willing to accept
Communism in return for what they had been fighting for over 2000 years: self rule.
In 1950 the United States, owing a debt of gratitude towards France, sent several advisors to aid French control in Vietnam. Over the next decade and a
half, the United States would send an entire Army and Navy to aid the French in maintaining control in South Vietnam, which had separated from the
Communist North Vietnam by treaty in 1954.
Communism is when all property and business is owned by the government and the people work for the government. In turn, the people all get ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
France had ruled Vietnam for more than a century and they had hoped to maintain that rule.
Communism has long been heralded in capitalist countries as the root of all evil. However, as with all phobias, this intrinsic fear of communism
comes from a lack of knowledge rather than sound reasoning. It is that same fear that gave the world the Cold War, McCarthy's Red Scare, and the
Vietnam War.
Karl Marx is a widely known influence on communism. It was his belief that private property was the cause of the poverty and degradation of the
proletariat. Therefore, he came to settle on the idea that no one person should have control over production of good, ownership of land, and
management of funds. In that same token then, no one class should be allowed to have control over these things. He went onto comment that the
exploitation of the working class must come to an end. That end could be achieved through revolution. Once this was achieved, everybody would
work according to their abilities and then be paid accordingly. Soon after; however, technical innovations would create such abundance of goods that
"everyone works according to his abilities and receives according to his needs." Soon thereafter, money would have no place in society. People would
be able to take what they want and would be lacking nothing. Marx then believed that the pleasure of seeing the fruits of labor would

Joseph Stalin Source Analysis
Source Analysis Source 1 contrasts liberalism through supporting fascism. The source is contrasting one of the liberals main ideas, Freedom of
choice. Liberalism focuses on the freedom of the individual and that choices that regard the individual should be made by the individual or
majority. The quotes is suggesting that through a general election, the chances of a good leader being chosen are rare. He suggests a specific
individual will be born a leader. In the first sentence of the quote, Hitler talks about the way a general election works. He calls it absurd and in turn is
saying how a general election is not a good way to elect a leader. This shows the resistance to liberalism as liberalism believes in a general election as it
backs up... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The quote starts by saying, " The state determines all that is morally, socially, and materially valuable". This quote shows exactly the totalitarianism
way of thinking. Its saying how the government or individual in power determines all aspects of life, determines what is good. This links to
liberalism through a harsh contrast. In liberalism, a main part of their beliefs is the freedom to the individual and freedom of expression. While this
source is saying that power should be limited to the person or government in power. In the middle of the quote it states, " No rights or freedoms should
exist apart from service to the state". That statement is expressing very harsh limitations on freedom. Later on in the quote it says, "Individuals and
groups constitute one unified, integral whole working towards common goals. This shows the anti–liberalism views as it is saying we need to
collectively work towards common goals. This is unlike liberalism as a major theme of liberalism is often linked to the thought of being an
individualist. This means it's encouraging individuals to not fall into social collectivism but rather to pursue personal interests and

Inside a Totalitarian Regime: Key features of Stalinism Essay
Stalin's rule lasted almost thirty years, from the middle of the 1920's until his death in 1953. His rule deeply transformed the USSR and destalinization
is still not fully achieved today. While Stalinism and Nazism are often compared because they were the two totalitarian regimes of the 20th century, the
Stalinist regime lasted for decades while Nazism collapsed after 12 years, thus raising several questions concerning the particular nature of the Stalinist
Society. What were the key features of Stalinism, thus differentiating Stalin's policy from Lenin's and Marx's theory? Was Stalinism a logical outcome
of the Marxist theory or a betrayal of communism? In this perspective, one must analyze Stalin's key policies, collectivization, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
W. Davies 1989, 1036) and the use of the agricultural production to finance the industrial expansion. Despite Bolsheviks encouraging collectivization in
the early years of the revolution, collective farms had remained anecdotic . Stalin's arrival to power marked the start of a forced and often violent
campaign of collectivization. In agreement with his doctrine of Communism in one country, Stalin aimed at developing a self–sufficient agricultural
system based on the Marxist theory of collective property of means of productions. In 1929, kolkhozy (farmers owned cooperative) and sovkhozy
(state owned farm employing farm workers) were created. Collectivization was as quick as brutal and symbolized the inefficiency of the Soviet
agricultural policy. Indeed, while collective farms quickly became the majority agricultural model , thousands of prosperous peasants, the kulaks, were
expropriated, deported and executed: "More than one million peasant families–five million people, at least – were dekulakized" (Viola 1996, 86).
However, despite an increased workforce, the interwar years' Soviet agricultural production never reached the prerevolutionary levels. Indeed, in 1937
which was the best interwar harvest, the agricultural production increased by 8.1 percent compared to 1928 while the population increased by 12
percent in the same period (Davies 1989, 1030). Furthermore, the agricultural production was used to fuel the growing industry. Peasants were

Trotsky 's Assessment Of The Continuity Between Stalinism...
Trotsky's assessment of the continuity between Stalinism and Leninism–Bolshevism is valid to a certain extent. It is axiomatic that there is a
multiplicity of factors that seem to correlate Stalinism to Leninism, thus adding validity to Trotsky's assessment of the continuity. However the
"straight–line" theory of the continuity between the two ideological phenomena, implied by Trotsky, undermines the divergence between them. Both
phenomenons rose up in the Soviet Russia during the times of civil unrest, but Stalinism can be seen as more of a "revolution from above" whilst the
Bolsheviks–Leninism can be seen as more of a "revolution from below".
The historical development of Stalinism can be traced and analyzed through its several stages. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, elements of discontinuity are also present as the revolution was perverted by the Stalinist structure as the 'dictatorship of the proletariat" soon
became the dictatorship of Stalin. Furthermore Stalin's theory of "Socialism in One Country" betrayed that of the Marxist–Leninist theory of
propagating socialism to other countries.
In order to fully assess the validity of the statement, two fundamental factors must we must firstly look at. Firstly the aspects of continuity that may
have lead to the the statement.Secondly, factors within the Stalinist regime that illustrate aspects of discontinuity from the Bolshevik regime. Lastly, the
reason for the characterization, on behalf of Trotsky to possibility to give validity to the Stalinist regime, likening that to the popularized
Leninist–Bolshevik regime.
Why does Trotsky legitimize the Stalinist regime as being linked to the Bolsheviks? Trotsky's assessment of the of the Stalinist phenomenon certainly
seems unexpected considering that any link between the two systems would certainly seem to undermine Trotsky's creditably as the appropriate
successor of Lenin.
Trotsky was a renowned revolutionary who played a pivotal role during the Bolshevik Revolutionary. He was born on November 7th, 1879 in
Yanovka, Ukraine, to Jewish parents. In many regards, Trotsky

The Revolutionary Armed Forces Of Colombia
(U) The purpose of this paper is to highlight The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia and their fight to equality. In 1964 Fuerzas Armadas
Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) were established. In the U.S., we know them as The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia. This the name
they use now but was originally named the Sothern Bloc. They surfaced because of the civil war from 1948 to 1958, known as La Violencia (
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People 's Army, 2017). After the civil war, many of the population felt neglected by their government
(Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People 's Army, 2017). With this neglection, FARC took it upon themselves to fight for equality in the
rural parts of Colombia. This is their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
FARC started providing educational and medical services to loyal communities, training militants for combat, and carrying out attacks (Revolutionary
Armed Forces of Colombia – People 's Army, 2017). FARC had serval more conferences and changed the name to FARC
–EP. EP stands for EjГ©rcito
del Pueblo which means People's Army. However, the U.S. still refers to them as the FARC. As time progressed, FRAC has cycled through several
leaders. With the death of their first leader Manuel Marulanda, to the most recent leader Rodrigo Londono Echeverri, better known by his alias
Timochenko (Who are the FARC, 2016).
(U) The FARC expansion and change of strategies allowed their number to grow. Anyone could join the FARC including women and children.
"Everyone that did join did voluntarily (Who are the FARC, 2016)." "As of 2016, FARC had about Twenty
–One children under the age of fifteen
(Who are the FARC, 2016)." "At their height, which was in 2000 the FARC had roughly around twenty thousand active fighters (Who are the FARC,
2016)." The Security force was roughly six thousand through seven thousand. That number does not include the eight thousand civilians who support
FARC (Who are the FARC, 2016). With this number, FARC has to figure out a way to separate themselves in order to complete

Everything Flows By Vasily Grossman
Throughout his novel Everything Flows, Vasily Grossman provides numerous occasions for defining freedom. In the midst of attempting to give
meaning to freedom, Grossman greatly invests in wrestling with the issue of why freedom is still absent within Russia although the country has seen
success in many different ways. Through the idea and image of the Revolution stems Capitalism, Leninism, and Stalinism. Grossman contends that
freedom is an inexorable occurrence and that "to live means to be free", that it is simply the nature of human kind to be free (200–204). The lack of
freedom expresses a lack of humanity in Russia, and though freedom never dies, if freedom does not exist in the first place, then it has no chance to be
kept alive. Through Grossman's employment of the Revolution and the ideas that stem from it, he illustrates why freedom is still absent from Russian
society, but more importantly why the emergence of freedom is inevitable.
The confusion at the lack of freedom in Russia despite the success the country has experienced through newly built cities, construction sites, and
military victories, is exemplified by Grossman early in the novel through the use of Ivan Grigoryevich, a Russian citizen recently released from the
Gulag (49). As daunting as that is, it is understandable why it is so. Freedom gives those who have it the opportunity to choose as they wish, do as
they wish, think as they wish, and say as they wish, but to Grossman, that is not

Why Did The Russian Revolution Occur
1)Why did the Russian Revolution take place? What are the events that led to this Revolution? How did this Revolution take place? What happened?
(15 points)
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was a result of four events: The Revolution of 1905, WWI, Marxism, and Marxist– Leninism. Each event contributed
in different ways to the beginning of a new Russian Era.
On January 22, 1905, workers led by a priest, marched to the Winter Palace to petition Czar Nicholas II. These workers were fighting for the right of
representation, known as DUMA. Upon the arrival of the mob/revolutionists, shots were fired by the Imperial Guard resulting in multiple deaths and
injuries. This event became known as "Bloody Sunday", and was succeeded by months of violent demonstrations. As a result of the march, the Czar
abolished DUMA and denied citizens their right to representation.
The second major event that contributed to the Russian Revolution was WWI. During the War,Russia's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Created by Karl Marx, this ideology focused on the economy of Russia, and the roles of each social classes. Progression from divided classes to the
formation of equality led to the rise of Communism. Under this Communist government, property was owned publicly and every individual was
financially supported according to their needs. The goal was to establish equality among the classes and restore the economic state of Russia.
The final event that led to the 1917 Revolution was the development of Marxism–Leninism, an adaptation of Marxism. The goal of this political
philosophy was to expand the socialist state through a one–party state, dominance over the economy, and opposition of capitalism. This ideology
believed that a formation of equality among classes would not arise unless revolutionary actions took place. Marxism Leninism called citizens to take
action, leading to the Revolution. As a result, the Soviet Union became the first communist

Khrushchev The Secret Speech Analysis
Between the early 1950's and early 1960's, The Khrushchev Thaw was expanding over Russia. Khrushchev's Thaw was Khrushchev turning the Soviet
Union into a more peaceful place. Khrushchev worked as First Secretary of the communist party of the Soviet Union between 1953 and 1964 and also
led the Soviet Union in the cold war. His speech, "The Cult of The Individual", was given on the 25th of February in 1952, three years after Joseph
Stalin's death, to a closed session of Communist party delegates along with guests and members of the press; however, this speech was not recorded
and is nicknamed "The Secret Speech". The purpose of Khrushchev's speech was to tempt the communist party closer to Leninism.
Khrushchev furthers his argument by emphasizing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
... Everywhere and in everything he saw "enemies," "two–facers" and "spies." Possessing unlimited power, he indulged in great willfulness and choked
a person morally and physically. A situation was created where one could not express one's own will.
This quote alone sent a whole room into shock. Hearing the leader they have learned to respect put into bad light shocked the communist party as a
whole. By insulting communisms biggest influence, Khrushchev had brought Leninism into the mainstream.
When he begins to move into his conclusion, he uses the rhetorical device appeal to pride. Khrushchev uses an emotional appeal while enticing his
audience into Leninism by saying:
Comrades! The 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union has manifested with a new strength the unshakable unity of our Party, its
cohesiveness around the Central Committee, its resolute will to accomplish the great task of building communism and the fact that we present in all
their ramifications the basic problems of overcoming the cult of the individual which is alien to Marxism–Leninism, as well as the problem of
liquidating its burdensome consequences, is evidence of the great moral and political strength of our

Voluntarism Pros And Cons Essay
1.In moments of frustration, some U.S. labor leaders have claimed that U.S. unions would be better off with a deregulation of labor law and a return to
the "law of the jungle." How would a return to voluntarism affect U.S. unions? Workers? Employers?
Student answers will vary. Example:
A return to voluntarism would definitely reduce the amount of bargaining power unions have. There are not many industries left where workers are
indispensable. If a company refuses to bargain and workers are left with striking as their largest bargaining chip, employers are very likely to just
replace them and go on with business. It is also reasonable to question whether this type of adversarial approach is really what workers want.
Voluntarism might help employers by giving them the upper hand, but it can also be detrimental if it makes employee relations more conflictual.
2.What are the pros and cons of adopting the German system of mandatory works councils in the United States?
Student answers will vary. Example:
Pros: provides employee voice without needing to go through the struggle of the NLRB representation election process; reduced scope for managerial
opposition to the creation of a vehicle for employee voice; can make positive contributions to employee relations; can demonstrate the benefits of voice
to workers and cause them to consider forming a union. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Cons: Union density does not reflect a majority of the population. Accompanied by business, their dual influence could potentially sway government
decisions in areas that would not represent the wishes of the general population. Pros of pluralism: Interest groups such as the labor movement and
employers' associations compete for influence by pressuring and lobbying lawmakers. Cons of pluralism: Interest groups such as labor unions and
employer associations are not formally incorporated into the political decision–making

Henry Kissinger : The United States Foreign Policy,...
ntroduction Henry Kissinger is one of the most extraodinary figures in the United States foreign policy. Under the Nixon's administration, Kissinger
served as a National Security Advisor and then as a Secretary of State. He was one of the few American diplomats who has known China intimately.
Based off of his personal recollections of the Chinese leaders during his visit as well as other historical records, Kissinger was able to investigate how
the Chinese leaders approach diplomacy, strategy, and negotiations with other countries during the 20th century. OnChina, written by Kissinger
provides analysis and historical context of Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, and Deng Xiaoping. With those analyses, Kissing was able to reflect on the
consequences for the global balance of power in the 21st century. This paper will review Kissinger's text as well as his main arguments, and will
evaluate the quality of Kissinger's arguments and focus on any areas of weakness within the book.
Summary
China's history continues to shape its contemporary thinking, foreign policy and diplomacy with the West. In order to understand China's politics and
its civilization in general, it is important to look into its history and its traditional philosophy. This book examined many key events in Chinese
foreign policy from the classical era to the present day, with an emphasis on the decades after the rise of Mao Zedong. The Chinese's response and its
approach to diplomacy and foreign policy were seen during

Vladimir Lenin Research Paper
What was the Russian government under Lenin like? What kinds of tasks did it attempt to achieve: Vladimir Lenin chose the timing of the communist
takeover perfectly. The Russians were so tired of fighting that when the takeover took place it faced hardly any resistance. The problem was that this
passive demeanor wouldn't last long. Communism is such a radical jump of ideologies you cannot expect everyone to suddenly embrace it with open
arms. Consequently, this led to the Bolsheviks becoming dictators in order to maintain rule. Lenin's first agenda was to end the war with Germany. He
viewed the war as a distraction to the Communist mindset and would not allow it to distract anyone. The entire Communist system was supposed to be
highly scientific based off of facts and logic. The only problem was that the system failed the Bolsheviks ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He saw right away the troubles of the original Communist manifesto and became impatient with Marx's idea of Communism arriving gradually yet
suddenly.
A Russian historian named Richard Pipes wrote, "Soviet Russia was the first society in history to outlaw law." What did he mean by that: Sometime
later in Lenin's rule he gave the order to every judge in Russia to base legal decisions, with their revolutionary minds. What this means is that the
judges could effectively ignore the law and make decisions that they thought would best serve the Communist revolution. The worst part is that the
only requirements needed to be a judge at the time were able to read and write. There was no need for silly things like study law for years and
memories the law to get a degree. Things like that were silly and hindered Communism. All a person needed was to make the best judgment they could
use their revolutionary mind. Anything to aid Communism. As you can imagine this did not sit well with some of the population as no doubt some
truly unfair punishments were handed

Capitalism, Liberalism And Marxism Leninism

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Patty Joseph

More from Patty Joseph (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Capitalism, Liberalism And Marxism Leninism