Ishmael Identity

Ishmael Identity
Ishmael is a philosophical novel written by Daniel Quinn in 1992. The work explores the mythical thinking which contributes to the current aspects of
modern civilization, as well as deliberates on the connection of the worldview in terms of sustainability, global problems and ethics. Using a Socratic
dialogue as the major style, it deconstructs the idea that humans stand at the core of biological evolution and posits anthropocentrism as the
underpinning for other judgments, myths and globalization trends. In general, the book offers an overwhelming history of civilization by illuminating
the assumptions and ideologies at the core of many global challenges. At the centre of the discussion – Ishmael – a learnt gorilla which can
communicate... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, it is impossible to introduce new categories of culture without deep exploration of the really existing ones. From this perspective, Quinn
fails to develop the new culture because it is just a synthesis of those he already got acquainted with. This is apparently the major reason why some of
his ideas could not be applied universally. Therefore, it is impossible to derive the ethical framework from mere practical observation. Hence, Quinn is
positive regarding his ideas about ethics, as well as the possibility to promote new ethical ideas and concepts, but the author could just consider the
problem from another angle and come to a similar conclusion. Finally, the Quinn fails to represent the idea that law is empirically false; if not, it could
help people predict the outcomes of their activities, but this is insufficient for promoting the ethical network. The major strength of the book lies in the
way the gorilla confronts life's major myths, challenges, and problems. Through the delivery of lessons that the narrator gains, the readers have a
marvelous opportunity to realize the detrimental effects and threats posed to humanity. It involves both environmental constraints and social ones. The
influence of the Mother Culture on the collective thinking has been revealed, along with the influence imposed by
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Ishmael: Humans Held Captive Essay
When someone hears the phrase "held captive", usually wild animals come to mind. No one ever really thinks of humans as being held captive.
However, in Daniel Quinn's 1992 novel Ishmael, the character of Ishmael tries teaching the story's narrator to think of ways in which he has been held
captive by both internal and external forces. Society has a way of making people feel like they need to do certain things to be successful, so basically
society is holding people captive by holding them back from living the way they want to. As humans, we also have ways of holding ourselves captive.
Ishmael compares our captivity with a form of blindness. Throughout the novel, Quinn helps the reader realize what they are blind to and what they are
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is just one of the ways humans hold themselves captive.
A big part of Ishmael's problem with humans is that we're selfish with our planet. We'd rather destroy our planet to benefit our needs than try to
tame our requirements. "You've been doing what you damn well please with the world. And of course you mean to go right on doing what you
damn well please with it, because the whole damn thing belongs to you." (Page 61) Throughout the book, Ishmael brings up humans using the
world to their own advantage and not caring what or who gets hurt in the process. I feel like this is one of Quinn's greatest examples of what we're
blind to. We don't realize that our oceans, our forests and wildlife and our environment aren't actually ours. This is another example of humans
thinking they're the top of the ecosystem and using the world because it "belongs to us." We realize that we're ruining habitats and using an excessive
amount of resources, but we do nothing to stop it. We ruin our world but don't get that we need our world. We've created a cycle that's holding us
captive but we don't know how to reverse it.
The character of Ishmael mentions many times that we are the only ones who can fix what's wrong with us. If everyone read the book, more people
would feel like a change needs to be made. I feel like Ishmael should be a part of the curriculum for many classes. The novel is so universal in the way
that it

Daniel Quinn's Ishmael
The novel Ishmael by Daniel Quinn is a very thought provoking novel about the role of man in this world. The narrator follows an ad looking for
someone who wants to save the world and finds a gorilla along with a sign that says ВЁwith man gone, will there be hope for gorilla?ВЁ This gorilla
can communicate telepathically and becomes the narrator's teacher. In the story people are grouped into two categories: the takers and the leavers.
The takers are civilized people, whereas the leavers are civilizations such as the Native Americans who live with the earth.The main ideas are that
humans are a part of nature and have to follow the laws of nature, that the Earth in deed was not made for man, and that humans were not meant to rule
the world, but... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Humans have laws saying it is illegal do things like abuse drugs, but laws like this can be changed by a vote. There needs to have a law like the
law of aerodynamics or the law of gravity that is proven to always be true. Humans need a law telling them the one right way to live. Ishmael
points out that all other creatures follow this law, and to determine what the law is, the narrator must look for what other creatures do that human do
not and visa versa. The narrator comes back having come up with four laws, and Ishmael accepts the first three. A species should never eliminate
their competitors; it is okay to kill in self defense, but not for the sake of killing. A species must not systematically destroy a competitor's food
source to make more room for themselves. A species may not deny another species access to food, unless that food is needed for survival. Ishmael
reduces these three laws into one law that states ВЁyou may compete but you may not wage warВЁ (131). Humans have to follow the same laws of
nature that every other animal must

Analysis Of ' The Jellyfish ' By Daniel Quinn
Djunny Thiersaint
Epifanio
Honors World Literature IV
12 November 2014
Ishmael
As much as humans don't want to admit it, the world wasn't solely created for us. The novel, Ishmael, written by Daniel Quinn has given us an insight
on how the world has been treated by man and how it could end. In a time where the world is being destroyed we need to step up and protect the earth
from total destruction.
The Taker culture believes that the world was created for them so therefore they can do whatever they want to it without any consequences.The idea
that man believes he rules the world is not only false but its constantly causing harm to the planet, Quinn uses a lot of metaphors to try and explain
what the takers are doing wrong and what should be fixed. An example would be the jellyfish story,the point of the jellyfish story is to show that man
is not the final product of evolution. In Ishmael 's story, the jellyfish tells the anthropologist a factual account similar to the narrator 's, except that its
version ends with the appearance of jellyfish.
Ishmael's point is that human culture operates under a creation myth where man is the climax of evolution even though the universe continues to
develop and evolution is still occuring, man assumes that the Earth was made for them, since they were its ultimate creation and final product. The
narrator then concludes that the premise of the Taker's story is that "the world was made for man" (Quinn) (61). The jellyfish story gives another

Brief Summary Of Ishmael By Daniel Quinn
Summary: In the novel Ishmael by Daniel Quinn, the effects of human activity in the world are discussed. At the beginning, the narrator reads an ad
in a newspaper about a man looking for a student to teach. The narrator is at first disgusted because he has been searching for a teacher for years and
now he finally finds someone begging for a student. The narrator meets the teacher and is shocked that it is a gorilla named Ishmael who can
telepathically speak to humans. Ishmael and the narrator meet regularly and Ishmael tells the narrator that humans can be divided into two categories
of takers and leavers. Takers are selfish people that are considered civilized and destroy the earth because believe it belongs to them, but they do not
realize the harmful effects of these actions. Wheres, leavers believe that man belongs to the world and therefore they live in harmony with it –– they
are considered uncivilized... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When he comes back, Ishmael is gone. After running around to find him, he discovers he is in the circus. Ishmael dies of pneumonia before the
narrator is able to save him from the circus. Because of this, he continues the teachings of Ishmael in his honor to aide in the end of the takers and the
rise of the leavers. Message: Throughout the book Quinn develops that "takers" are greedy people who do not realize they are destroying the world
and will therefore fall in the end. Ishmael's lessons and the myths that are told throughout the book depict the message that takers are unaware of their
actions and "leavers" need to rise. Incident: When Ishmael and the narrator first met and bonded over their fascination with the story of Hitler. I myself
never understood why so many people would follow Hitler's command, but I finally understood when Ishmael explains that it was because Hitler told a
story that stuck with the people. Four environmental

Ishmael's Analysis: Back To New Bedford
Ishmael is amazed by the riches of New Bedford, but describe it as a"queer place" and wonders where the wealth all came from. Then he assumes
it was the whaling industry that made this place so successful. Something to point out is how he reference the whalemen as "us," and giving himself
a credit. The readers can assume that Ishmael either might have been a whalemen for a while or have a long family history in whaling industry.
Back to New Bedford, Ishmael goes on to describe the town a "dearest place" to live in order to show the effects of the whaling industry. He does this
by putting down or belittling other parts of the "back country." He uses the word "frighten" and "bony" to show their misery and isolation from New
Bedford. That... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Despite Queequeg's appearance and his wealthy heritage, Ishmael sees the "simple honest heart" which allows him to open up. Ishmael decides to
"try a pagan friend". After confirming their friendship, "marriage," Queequeg wants to share everything with Ishmael even his religion. This puts
Ishmael in consideration. As Christian, Ishmael cannot defy God's command by worshiping an idol. However, Ishmael really likes Queequeg and
doesn't want their religion to be conflict between their friendship. He repeatedly questions himself about the Queequeg's offer. Then he ask "what is
worship" and what God will want him to do. Then he confirms himself that worship is spreading His gospel to the people. In order to make
Queequeg join his religion, he has to first be tolerant to other religion and slowly get Queequeg on his side. Even if uniting with him requires turning
to an idol, this is the only to build Queequeg trust Ishmael. After all, it was Queequeg's background that made him believe such religion; it was what
he grew up

Ishmael Ambiguity Quotes
Tattered Remains of a Pasteboard Mask:
Ishmael's Attention to Codes and Humanity in Moby–Dick The ending of Moby–Dick leaves readers with an overwhelming sense of ambiguity. Yes,
Ishmael is rescued, but at what cost? Ishmael flounders, both emotionally and physically, desperately grasping onto a coffin–turned–life–buoy while all
he has come to know – friendship and community – dragged down to the depths by the culmination of incarnate evil. On the surface, it is a bleak
conclusion for a protagonist who began the novel similarly hopelessly abandoned. However, Ishmael does give the reader an answer regarding cost,
but it is not found in the final words of the novel – but rather in the entirety of Moby–Dick, as Ishmael's attempts to retell the story are an unconscious
effort to heal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All that is left is a personal acknowledgement for Ishmael of his own humanity rooted in sorrow. Yet, once again, the reader is left with ambiguity; but
an ambiguity cast in a more positive light – Ishmael is not fully healed (nor may he ever be), but the retelling of the story has done some good. As Fee
writes, "The text does not resolve a trauma for the narrator, nor bear direct witness to an historical trauma; rather, it invents a trauma and beckons the
reader to experience it" (148). And so the reader is beckoned to experience Ishmael's therapeutic recognition of humanity, despite the hopeless
abandonment of the ending. Yes, Moby–Dick is a tragedy, but important affirmations and scenes vouching for the human spirit can be found among the
wreckage of the Pequod. While not fully healed, Ishmael is on his way; alone, but also alive – he is hopeless, but relieved. Ishmael's story is told, and
in it, a new acknowledgment of human nature is found, for one first needs a family to be an

Analysis Of My Ishmael By Daniel Quinn
My Ishmael, by Daniel Quinn, is a book about one 12–year old girl named Julie Gerchak answering an advertisement looking for a pupil that "Must
have an earnest desire to save the world"(Page 3). She goes over to the address on the ad, and meets a silverback gorilla named Ishmael, a maieutic
teacher. There, they have long discussions about culture and perspective. Eventually, Julie and a man named Art Owens help Ishmael escape to a
remote jungle in Africa. However, one man named Alan Lomax is overly attached to Ishmael, and would not let him leave. For instance, Art Owens
said, ("Every once in a while Ishmael will encounter a pupil who just won't let go", page 270). The biggest problem Julie faced was the massive size of
the problems discussed

Post Modernism and 'City of Glass'
There is no clear definition of what postmodernism is. However, City of Glass is considered to be the by far the text which is most visibly
postmodernism. This is precisely because it "offers the kind of narrative that zigzags visibly, deliberately missing at all angle the sense of a foundation."
The postmodernist discourse remains central to the understanding of City of Glass. Perhaps the only thing that makes the story alluring is the fact that
it is steeped in postmodernist features. Otherwise, it would have been just a cold and ambiguous story about too many coincidences. To understand the
novel's play with predictability, we must have recourse to the post modernist discourse about it. Aristotle primarily argued in "Poetics" that:... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As we see there is no clear structure in the novel. It is characterized by fragmentation and these fragmentations can stand on their own which is
contrary to Aristotle's concept of order in the novel. For instance, City of Glass can stand on its own even if it is only part of The New York Trilogy. The
story can start anywhere and end anywhere. Auster's story "branches out in all directions, without a beginning, middle or end like some structureless
'rhizome'" and it actually reflects the typical the "postmodern 'central emptiness under the absent god'". He therefore, disrupts the usual order of
things. Moreover, chance becomes the order by which the story operates. In fact, chance becomes what makes the story moves forward. For instance,
if Quinn had not received the wrong call by pure chance, there probably would not have been any story. The story begins on hazard circumstances and
thrives on hazards to develop. Even the ending of City of Glass is one that is prone to lead to more hazard instances. The story in itself does not deny
the hand of chance as Quinn; himself states "nothing is real except the chance". The result of this is endless possibilities and alternatives. This reflects
what Baudrillard maintains in 'Chance, Culture and the Literary Text' where he claims that "certain phenomena happen beyond our control and hence
chance allowed certain space to escape responsibility for such phenomena."
It should be considered that memory plays a

A Dog's War: A Short Story
"That's impossible," Gage states bluntly in a voice devoid of any kind of emotion. He won't allow himself to think about that day, still able to see the
blood on the floor as he watches his mother being taken out of the junk shop. He can still remember her smiling at him and assuring him that
everything was going to be okay.
"We've all heard what happened to her," Fox adds. "We know that Mrs. Turner and Elizabeth both died during childbirth. There's no way that could
have been faked."
"Besides," Cal supplies. "The girl we saw was too old. Elizabeth would have been five years younger than Gage. There's maybe two years difference
between him and the girl that was in the alley with him. The time frame just isn't right."
"What did the two of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The man had tormented him during his entire childhood, blaming him for what had happened to his mother and baby sister. Gage has avoided him ever
since he had gotten old enough to take care of himself. He didn't relish the thought of seeking the old man out now, even if he is reported to be
sober. He stares down into Cybil's face, allowing himself to get lost in her eyes to help keep himself calm. Before he realizes what is happening, his
lips are pressed against hers, and he has her down on the couch.
"Ahem," Quinn's voice, filled with amusement, interrupts the two of them. "Sorry to interrupt, guys," she states. "Fox and Layla are going to try to
link up and see if they can see where the girl is in the present. I told them to give me a few minutes to make sure the two of you are decent." She
laughs. She purposefully avoids calling the girl Gage's sister, sensing he isn't quite ready to accept that it might be

Essay about Good and Evil in Quinn's Ishmael
Human beings are destroying the world. It's a fact we all know. Pollution is abundant, we chop down rain forests, we kill our own kind, we steal,
lie, and cheat, and the list could go on and on. Daniel Quinn believes that this destruction comes from something more extreme than just the notion to
survive. In his novel, Ishmael, Quinn believes that the problems facing humanity are do to man's knowledge of good and evil. Man's knowledge of
good and evil gives us the power to rule the world any way we please. A God or Gods no longer have control. Once Adam, who represents the life of
the human race, took a bite from the fruit of the tree of knowledge man's fate was sealed. This knowledge insured, "Man was born to rule the world"
(165). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Now, no matter what decision man makes or action man does, it is the correct one. Man's knowledge of good and evil, and the belief in their ultimate
power, is what leads to destruction. While man has the knowledge, man has, "no certain knowledge about how they ought to live" (88). What is good
and evil is something there are no concrete answers for, yet man creates these answers to please himself. Because they have no concrete answers, man
has to go on ruling the world, "even if it means destroying the world and mankind with it" (168). Man, even while slowly destroying the world, will
never be able to let go of their power and give up the knowledge of good and evil. For man to give back the knowledge they have attained, "would
mean to spitting out the fruit of that tree and giving the rule of the world back to the gods" (168). By doing this man would return to innocence,
become a childlike creature that depends on the gods to rule their lives. Man will have the wisdom of the gods, "if he tries to preempt that wisdom,
the result won't be enlightenment, it will be death" (183). It is this lack of wisdom that leads man to continue to destroy the world. This scares man
and ensures that man will never let go of the knowledge of good and evil. Quinn proves that the knowledge of good and evil has certainly lead to the
destruction of the world. Man's power far outweighs man's ability to savor the world. I believe Quinn makes a very

Environmental Problems Facing The Earth
Patton, Cade
AP Environmental Science
The biggest environmental problem that faces Earth today is pollution. There are a bunch types of pollution on planet Earth but by far air pollution is
the deadliest. Air pollution can inhibit the breathing of living organisms. Many major companies including Exxonmobil and Bp who are leading the air
pollution race with a Exxonmobil averaging 39 million tons of emissions. These emissions are released into the air by the process of making gasoline
and chemicals. The second biggest environmental problem Earth faces each year is the decrease of natural resources. When it comes to natural
resources the depletion of fossil fuels and deforestation are destroying the planet. Deforestation is the removal of trees in a wide area to the point
of where it's almost not a forest anymore. On the other hand the depletion of fossil fuels is scary because fossil fuels are a nonrenewable resource.
They are nonrenewable because they are being used up faster than they are being created. And it can take up to millions of years for more fossil fuels
to be created. And finally for my third pick of the biggest environmental problems facing the Earth is the depletion of its Ozone layer. Some chemicals
named Chlorine and bromine are in the atmosphere and are deteriorating the Ozone layer which consists of three hydrogen atoms.
2. Maybe Ishmael was named after the character in Moby Dick. In the book Moby Dick the character Ishmael is the only surviving member

Our Treatment Of Nature By Daniel Quinn
In regards to our treatment of nature, you write, "Today, however, the population has grown to the point that nature itself is threatened but we have no
ethical tools with which to protect and defend nature." This problem has existed for quite some time, but has just not began to go widely noticed. A
philosopher in his own right, Daniel Quinn, speaks of similar topics using his character, Ishmael, to do so. To best describe this scenario, Ishmael had
a poster which read, "With man gone, will there be hope for gorilla?" this quote in itself hold little meaning until you take the deeper meaning by
using gorilla as nature; Quinn speaks throughout the book of how earth was not created for man, man is just one more short portion of earth's history
and will be seen as such when times change. The meaning of this quote then becomes, will earth have any hope if man dies? This interpretation
requires the assumption that man controls nature, he takes care of it, rather than being a part of it and respecting it. At the conclusion of the book,
Quinn shows the other side of the poster which held the quote and it reads, "with gorilla gone, will there be hope for man?" Again, once realizing
gorilla is a euphemism for nature, we realize nature what Quinn has been preaching the entire book, man does not control nature, nature was not
created for man, but man is slowly killing it. On your statement, saying the population is too great for nature to sustain everyone, I completely agree.
Too

An Adventure Of The Mind And Spirit By Daniel Quinn
Ishmael, "An Adventure of the Mind and Spirit", a novel written by Daniel Quinn. Ishmael is a story based on the issues involving earth, such as
global warming. Throughout the story Ishmael, a telepathic gorilla, and the narrator, name unknown, discover the true meaning behind the world, and
how we are slowly coming to an end. As the share their ideas with one another they try and attempt to change the point of view mankind has on day to
day living. Many lines of wisdom are said throughout the novel, which will be further explained in detail. The world itself is facing many issues in all
topics of discussion, but we are the ones who are making this an issue. It comes down the us to save mankind, to save nature, to save the world!
Ishmael and the narrator are the main focus in this story, but mainly Ishmael. He is the telepathic, gorilla, genius. Ishmael being a telepathic genius is
accompanied by the narrator of the story, as mentioned earlier. His name is unknown throughout the book, but is a great interest. He is Ishmael's fifth
student, who is open minded, self centered but strives to see Ishmael as more than just a friend, and he is overall a student who will take Ishmael's
ways in affect. The word telepathy is a noun, with the meaning of communication through the mind by thoughts or ideas, other than known senses.
Maieutic is an adjective which is described as, denoting Socratic mode, a form of cooperative argumentative dialogue between individuals, based on
asking

Ishmael a Novel by Daniel Quinn
In his novel Ishmael, Daniel Quinn discusses the destruction and salvation of the world. By way of a newspaper ad, an unnamed narrator meets a
telepathic gorilla, named Ishmael, who had put up the ad to find a pupil with a desire to save the world. Spurred by his benefactor's obsession with
Nazi Germany, Ishmael imparts on the narrator what he knows best: captivity (Quinn 24). Ishmael claims humans of what are considered civilized
cultures are captives of a story that in turn keeps the world captive. Ishmael calls this large group "Takers," while he calls everyone else–usually
hunter–gatherers of "primitive" cultures–"Leavers" (Quinn 39). In order to save the world, Ishmael believes Takers need to be freed from the story they
are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Researchers of the University of New Mexico found the time of the extinction coincided more with colonization by humans than climate change and
that hunter–gatherers, such as the Clovis people, hunted the mammals for food (Lyons et al 339, 351–252; Wroe et al 320). Although it could be
argued that they were Leavers by not exterminating their competition, they could have instead been hunter–gatherer Takers believing all large
mammals were something to be conquered and owned as agricultural Takers view the soil of the world.
Despite this romanticization of the hunter–gatherer lifestyle, however, Ishmael isn't urging people to become hunter–gatherers to save the world nor is
he saying all hunter–gatherers are Leavers. Ishmael says settlement–and, by extent, agriculture–is a biological adaptation, which can compete with other
adaptations and, thus, is "subject to the laws of competition" (Quinn 135). If hunter–gatherer Takers can exist, agricultural Leavers could too, or as
Ishmael bluntly puts it, "The Leaver lifestyle isn't about hunting and gathering, it's about letting the rest of the community live" (Quinn 250). As Leaver
groups typically find a lifestyle that suits them, Takers could invent a new lifestyle, incorporating agriculture and settlement, to avoid the destruction of
the world.
As societies of today become more aware of their impact on the world, I feel we begin to work towards belonging to the world

Ishmael: An Adventure Of The Mind and Spirit Human civilization can be divided into two on one precise premise; those who live as if they belong
to the world, and those who live as if the world belongs to them (the vast majority). In Ishmael by Daniel Quinn these ideas and others are expanded
upon to create a philosophical journey in the readers mind. Ishmael is told from the point of view of a middle–aged man who had long given up his
idea of 'saving the world', but an ad in the personals section of the newspaper reignites his youthful dreams. Pursuing the ad, the man finds himself in
the home of Ishmael, an old gorilla that has more to offer the world than most humans. Ishmael, with the help of his previous caretaker Walter Sokolow,
has... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The pages are lined with opinions and assumptions about human nature and the way the world works. Quinn, speaking through the character of
Ishmael voices his opinions on how the way we are living is affecting the world in itself. Readers should pick and choose what to believe from this
document. This document is very against humans taking advantage of the world, and acting as if the world belongs to them – which is very
convincing to a humanist or an enthusiastic environmentalist. However, many people may disagree. This is not a work of nonfiction, so it is left
very much up to interpretation. Some people that enjoy the lavish life humans are living would toss the book aside with all the others, disregarding
the overall message of the story. Others however, will read it and adapt its contents as their life, sharing the message and living by Ishmael's morals.
Ishmael was written in 1992 – just some 22 years ago. The way in which it is written reflects on the semi–modern environment that Quinn was living
in. The narrator talks of the busy times of business and modern technology like computers. The language was mostly as people talk day to day these

Daniel QuinnвЂ™s Ishmael
Ishmael: Paradigms of Yesterday
"Come with me if you want to live," was all that Arnold Schwarzenegger said in his movie Terminator 2: Judgement Day, and after reading Daniel
Quinn's masterpiece Ishmael, one might well receive the impression Quinn echoes such sentiments. Few books have as much relevancy in this
technological, ever–changing world as Ishmael.
In the beginning, according to Ishmael, God created Man to live peacefully on Earth, sustained by the fruitful bounties of Earth and subject to God's
control. That is, until Man ate of the Tree of Good and Evil in the Garden Of Eden, and conveniently forgot all the rules God had so graciously placed
in front of him. From that point on, the Caucasian race, full of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Throughout it all, Ishmael leads his pupil through his trials with wit and wisdom, even while leading him towards solutions for world hunger and
environmental destruction. Makes one wonder how it is that Quinn, as he claims, arrived at all of the conclusions in the book by simply going to the
library and doing a little research. Part parable, part myth, and totally compelling, Ishmael leaves one hungry and wondering, waiting for the next
chapter of humanity's tale to play out. As any good book does, Ishmael leaves readers with more questions than answers, and demands that the reader
figure out the solution for himself.
As one critic put it, good books generate a "healthy confusion," a curious combination of "pleasure and disquietude." Ishmael is no different. Much of
the confusion present in this work stems from the assertion by Daniel Quinn that most of the lessons taught by the monotheistic religions of the world
have gaping holes in them. They provide a shaky framework for a self–sustaining culture, and soon man will pay for his ignorance by the destruction of
the environment. Quinn goes on to say that most of the world revolves around totalitarian agriculture, a way of life that bleeds the land dry of fo~,.)
Since this type of agricultural abuse is good at producing food surpluses~"o supports the growing world

Don T Call Me Ishmael Bullying Quotes
The brilliant author, Michael Gerard Bauer, raises a key topic that affects many people in today's society in his extraordinary novel, Don't Call Me
Ishmael! Bauer wisely uses humorous situations to pinpoint to young adults a well–known problem in our society today, bullying. There is an
abundance of bullying by one of the key characters in the book, the toughest and the meanest kid in school, Barry Bagsley. Not only does Barry bully
Ismael, but he also bullies other characters in the book. At first Ishmael blames himself for the constant bullying he receives off Barry, however, as the
story continues Ishmael grows confidence and realises that Barry was the real problem and bullying is strictly not allowed.
The horrendous acts of Barry affects many characters over the course of the novel, including Bill Kingsley, James Scobie and Ishmael himself. The
first and most obvious act of bullying seen in the book is during roll call when Ishmael's name is called out. Barry being the boy he is, he shouted,
"Ishmael? That's a wussy crap name!" This is the first sign of bullying and also the first instance of the readers ultimately being told that Ishmael
doesn't fit in at school. Mrs Torango, Ismael's teacher, decides that she needs to put a stop to the bullying at the first given opportunity. Giving Ishmael
some hope that one–day, he could be like Mrs Torango and stand up for himself.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The humour in the book is like hot chips with its sauce, it fits together magnificently. Primarily, the humour used over the course of the novel interests
and captivates many of his readers. Although many don't recognise the hidden theme of bullying, a minority of people will realise and reflect upon it.
The book needs its humour to relate to the given audience, the hidden theme of bullying is an addition that helps the readers understand the significant
issue of

Daniel Quinn Identity
Daniel Quinn's identity, or lack thereof, is at the center of The City of Glass. As readers, it is difficult to determine who exactly Daniel Quinn wishes
to be. As Quinn descends into madness throughout the story, he plays with several identities, all of which serve as imperfect placeholders for things in
his life that are missing.
At the opening of the story, Quinn is an individual on the verge of a descent into madness. He "no longer wishes to be dead," but he is far from
happiness (Auster 6). With the death of his wife and son, Quinn has lost his sense of purpose, no longer existing "for anyone but himself" (5). This
tragic reality sets the stage for the rest of the story. Rather than cope with his grief, Quinn chooses to live under a "triad ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Since we never saw Quinn before the death of his family, it is not possible for us to know who Quinn really is. It is quite possible that his family
defined his entire identity. Once his family died, he "stopped thinking of himself as real," instead choosing to simply exist day–to–day (10). Each
identity that Quinn uses in City of Glass takes him a step further to rediscovering who he truly is. Although this story never truly resolves Quinn's
identity, the fusion of many personages helps us to realize that discovering one's identity is not always a straightforward

How Does Ishmael Change Throughout The Novel
"Call me Ishmael" (p. 1) is the opening words of Herman Melville's novel. He introduces the main character and give the readers a sense of his
personality. Ishmael tells a story of his whaling voyage upon the Pequod and of his adventures along the way. Ishmael's character changes from
the beginning of the novel to the end due to his experiences and the challenges that is faced with. A few conflicts appear, however, he learns how
to handle them and to become independent. Herman Melville's Moby Dick is more than facts about a whale; he tells a story about a Ishmael's
whaling voyage. Ishmael's voyage changes who he is and it will leave him with memories that he will never forget. At the beginning of the novel,
Herman Melville gives an abundance of detail on Ishmael's character. He writes, "having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to
interest me on shore, I thought I would sail about a little and see the watery part of the world" (p.1). The readers learn that Ishmael sails for the
money and for the adventure. He is not the kind of person to pay to be on a... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Moby Dick has finally come into sight and captain Ahab is determined that they will catch the whale this time. After three days of chasing the whale
down, the whale is not caught. Moby Dick ends up drowning the captain when struck with the harpoon. The whale then goes on a rampage and
destroys the Pequod. Ishmael is the only one that was upon the Pequod to survive the wreckage that Moby Dick has caused. As Ishmael struggles to
stay afloat, "the coffin life–buoy shot lengthwise from the sea, fell over, and floated by my side" (p. 569). Ishmael stays afloat on the life–buoy for a
day and a half before being rescued by another ship. He is very lucky to not have been attacked by any whales or by any sharks while floating in the
open sea. This novel is being told from the only survivor upon the

Ishtar Gate Mosaics
Artist: Unknown Civilization: Babylonian Title: Ishtar Gate mosaics Walking through the Ishtar Gate with mosaics full of dangerous wild animals
that some people consider to be beasts will create fear, terror for me. Though, humans are considered to be the best prey and the most intelligent
creatures but, walking in between about 120 glazed bricks of wild animals, will make man feel inferior and scared of this animals. Since the Ishtar
gate is a pathway leading to a certain place, the purpose of these mosaics will be to give men walking through a greater sense of fear and powerless
of the place the Ishtar gate leads to. Artist: Unknown and Polykleitos Civilization: Greece and Roman Title: Anavysos Kouros and Spear bearer
(Doryphorous)... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Artist: Hironymus Bosech Civilization: Renaissance Title: Unknown 1)The Mouth House. This is a horrifying figure in the paint being from the fact
that in its mouth, humans are coming from it. To me, it looks like the men coming out from its mouth are escaping from the horrifying life they live
in. 2)The creature running after the sheep. Sheep symbolizes meekness and obedient. Between the Sheep and this scary creature is the Shepard who
is protecting the sheep from this wild beast. 3)The Owl .First of all, looking at any Owl is scary because of their big scary eyes, the Owl in this
painting eye is very large, and on top of the head, there is a rotten like substance on it which makes the Owl more scary Artist: Unknown Civilization:
Native Americans Title:

Analysis Of Ishmael
Analysis of Ishmael
1) I do agree with what Ishmael (Quinn) saying in the above quote. Ishmael is saying that people are not ignorant of the fact that they are destroying
the world, they are just egotistical and thinking only of themselves. "I'm sure he knows that any species in the wild will invariably expand to the
extent that its food supply expands. But as you know, Mother Culture teaches that such laws do not apply to man." (133) If the Takers don't change the
way they live destruction will continue to exist and humans having their minds set, cant change it. "The rule of that law was and is sufficient.
Mankind was not needed to bring order to the world" (146). Ishmael is explaining how humans believe that the world was created for ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
I think the quote " Obviously Mother Culture must be finished off if you're going to survive, and that's something the people of your culture can
do. She has no existence outside your minds. Once you stop listening to her, she ceases to exist." (144) really emphasizes Quinn's message because
its says that people can stop being ignorant and realize whats happening to our world. Also, the quote "Within your culture as a whole, there is in
fact no significant thrust toward global population control. The point to see is that there will be such a thrust so long as you're enacting a story that
says the gods made the world for man." (137) helps define Quinn's message by telling readers that if they don't except the fact that the world was
made solely for them, they will have no control over what happens to the world. These quotes important to Quinn's ideas because it could help change
the minds of readers and help educate them. Quinn is trying to let the reader know that if their ways do not change and they don't realize they are
always right there will be

In his novel Ishmael, Daniel Quinn discusses the destruction and salvation of the world. By way of a newspaper ad, an unnamed narrator meets a
telepathic gorilla, named Ishmael, who had put up the ad to find a pupil with a desire to save the world. Spurred by his benefactor's obsession with
Nazi Germany, Ishmael imparts on the narrator what he knows best: captivity (Quinn 24). Ishmael claims humans of what are considered civilized
cultures are captives of a story that keeps the world captive. This large group, Ishmael calls "Takers," while everyone else–usually hunter–gatherers of
"primitive" cultures–Ishmael calls "Leavers" (Quinn 39). In order to save the world, Ishmael believes Takers need to be freed from the story they are ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although it could be argued that they were Leavers by not exterminating their competition, they could have instead been hunter–gatherer Takers
believing all large mammals were something to be conquered and owned as agricultural Takers view the soil of the world.
Despite this romanticization of the hunter–gatherer lifestyle, however, Ishmael isn't urging people to become hunter–gatherers to save the world.
Ishmael says settlement–and, by extent, agriculture–is a biological adaptation, which can compete with other adaptations and, thus, is "subject to the
laws of competition" (Quinn 135). If hunter–gatherer Takers can exist, agricultural Leavers could too, or as Ishmael bluntly puts it, "The Leaver
lifestyle isn't about hunting and gathering, it's about letting the rest of the community live" (Quinn 250). As Leaver groups typically find a lifestyle
that suits them, Takers could invent a new lifestyle to avoid the destruction of the world.
As societies of today become more aware of their impact on the world, I feel we begin to work towards belonging to the world rather than ruling the
world–we become less self–centered. There are individuals beside Daniel Quinn who warn about the destruction of the world. In 2007, Al Gore and
others won the Nobel Peace Prize for "their efforts to bring the impending environmental, social, and political catastrophes of global warming to the
public's attention"

Essay Totalitarian Agriculture
Totalitarian Agriculture The idea of Totalitarian Agriculture is scary. Especially considering the fact that it is the exact type of agriculture that is
being used in every civilization except for the remaining tribal peoples of the world. I will try to define Totalitarian Agriculture here: "According to
an ethics, followed by every sort of creature within the community of life, sharks as well as sheep, killer bees as well as butterflies, you may compete
to the full extent of your capabilities, but you may not hunt down your competitors or destroy their food or deny them access to food. In other words,
you may compete, but you may not wage war. This ethics is violated at every point by practitioners of totalitarian... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Why totalitarian agriculture? You got me. It is really hard to knock Totalitarian Agriculture since it is the foundation of our culture and the sustenance
of our lives. If Totalitarian Agriculture were to disappear tomorrow, then our culture would be obliterated by starvation. This is not so for the
remaining tribal peoples of the world. They are fully well capable of surviving on their own just the same as humans have been since there were
humans. Thinking about this further made me think about the reasons for adopting this practice. Our culture practices working to grow and produce
food, locking it up, and then forcing people to pay to get it. before the agricultural revolution 10,000 years ago, humans had been living successfully as
hunter–gatherers for a hundred thousand years, so asked myself what was the reason for this sudden mind change to the practice of Totalitarian
Agriculture? One answer is due to the vast amounts of food surpluses that are created with totalitarian agriculture. This is part of the answer to the next
reason for totalitarian agriculture, which is power and expansion. The founders of totalitarian agriculture thought that their way to live was the one
right way for all humans to live. These vast surpluses of food enabled this culture to expand into surrounding territories near the Tigris and Euphrates
rivers, and use force to take the land from tribal peoples. So now, the first generations of our culture putting

Developing Science And Technology Like Agriculture Made It
With man developing science and technology like agriculture made it manageable for society to increase the supply of food. As a consequence,
society population began to increase and has been increasing throughout the past years. Even Though society is in a risk that the earth is able to only
feed so many of us, yet as we are in our altar of supremacy we are destroying earth rather than conserving it for the years to come, and for animals
evolution.
First of all, by living captive to the Taker story we assume that the world belongs to man, which makes mankind feel superior to what is among earth.
As result, we are destroying the world by wanting to live the "right way" which would be by conquering our surroundings by overpopulation, yet in
the future earth will have no more to provide for us and we will end up fighting each other for food. We live and make choices considering our right
and wrong by the taker story. We do not question our beliefs, we need to find a new story to enact to prevent the devastation of earth, and every
specie in it to be killed because humans do not want to recognize that we do not know how to conserve earth.
Second of all, even though man is superior our assumptions made because of the taker story, yet it does not pertain to me because of my gender role. In
Oppression by Marilyn Frye states , "Women are incapable"(152). It is true that we do not have share similar characteristics to man, but we also need
ways to survive to live and the

The City Of Glass And The Maltese Falcon
The two texts, The City of Glass and The Maltese Falcon, are both based on the detective genre and within these are the basic characteristics of human
beings in the face of various external factors. With The Maltese Falcon oriented to the modernism period, there are general expectations on the
revelations of truth, time moving in a chronological sequence, and character development to progress the plot. The City of Glass on the other hand is a
post–modern novel and highlights many of the characteristics of the creativity during that time, filled with non–truths, compressed time spaces and
non–progression. The plots are developed from two characters, Sam Spade and Daniel Quinn. As each makes an attempt to unravel the mysteries
surrounding ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Spade 's emotionless state deviates from those norms, leaving the reader to wonder why he was not upset by the sudden death of his partner. This
assumed friendship is the second possible reason Polhaus is confused. In his belief of the closeness between Spade and Archer, there has to be
something Spade knows about the circumstances surrounding Archer's death. Spade 's rather dismissive manner is discouraging for one to mention
the subject. Indirectly, this points to the curious nature of human beings where an event raises all sorts of questions and they hope to get the first
real truths from those most likely to know all of the necessary details; in this case, Spade. Polhaus is at a loss for words because he is stopped from
making further inquiries by Spade. Spade 's reaction may, therefore, not be so much as being cold but rather defensive. He might be trying to avoid
unnecessary probing choosing rather keep his grief locked inside. The reaction by Spade points to another human truth which can be seen from Brigid
O'Shaughnessy– deception. Deception implies the non–disclosure of truth, but reveals things that are not as if they were. Brigid comes into the picture
when in that first chapter she speaks of her sister with a sense of shame that both Spade and Archer can not help but notice and empathize with. "...the
girl

The Evolution Of Human Civilization In Ishmael By Daniel...
In the novel Ishmael by Daniel Quinn, an unnamed narrator finds a mentor named Ishmael. Ishmael is a gorilla that teaches through telepathy, how
human civilization has developed to its current state. He explains that human culture can be split into two groups: Takers and Leavers. Takers are the
most dominant culture; they seek to control the world through aggressive agricultural production and development of new technology. The leavers on
the other hand, are people who live in tribal cultures that respect the world and seek to coexist with other species on earth. Ishmael explains that the
world is in danger, as the Taker way of life is destroying the world. The book challenges the idea that humans should rule the world and presents
different views on how human civilisation is destroying the world through its aggressive expansion.
A metaphor Ishmael used in the book (pages 61–63) was that Takers expansion in the world can be viewed like an early airman testing out the first
aircraft with flapping wings, its design based on a mistaken understanding of the laws of flight. As the flight starts out, all is well, as the airman
moving through the air freely. However, he is actually in freefall, as the device is not fit for flying. The man looks at all the abandoned crafts on the
ground and wonders why they didn't strive for flight like him. As he realizes he is falling to the ground, he tries to save himself by pedalling with all
his might, but as the aircraft is fundamentally flawed, this does nothing to save him. This journey can be compared to the journey of human civilization,
which started out based on the misconception that a human dominated earth could be sustainable. It failed to obey the basic laws of nature, which is
currently leading it to its downfall. This metaphor is very applicable to the world today, as we deal with the effects of human activities such as mass
industry, deforestation, and destruction of natural animal habitats for human settlement. These activities may seem to bring many benefits in the short
term, such as economic and technological development, easy access to energy and food, and cheap resources for mass production of goods; however,
in the long term these destructive human

Exploring the Theme of Moral Responsibility in Daniel...
We are destroying the earth in order to survive. What is our Moral Responsibility?
Daniel Quinn has written a book about how things have come to be the way they are. He looks at the meaning of the world and the fate of humans.
Ishmael the main character is a teacher of vast wisdom, as well as being a Gorilla. Being no ordinary Gorilla, Ishmael recognises the failing of human
kind in relation to their moral responsibilities. He ultimately directs use towards a solution to the problems we have created for the planet. Ishmael is
trying to convey that man kind is living in such a way that we can not last. Our vast numbers alone is hindering our survival.
Moral responsibility is a clear theme of this text. One prime example is: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The UK Parliament has made considerable movement towards helping schools in Britain to become kinder to the planet. The Scottish government has
introduced an eco–schools programme into the British school system. These eco–schools and the government hold close links with Education for
sustainable development (ESD).
"We have to learn our way out of current social and environmental problems and learn to live sustainably." (ESD)
The eco–schools programme offers environmental education that benefits the pupils by developing the skills in them that will help them live a morally
responsible life.
I believe anyone who reads this book will be made to stop and think about their contribution to the suffering of the world. It is extremely thought
provoking book; it makes you question how society functions and the life you live. This is a dominant theme in all RE classrooms. It is imperative
that pupils think of the world they live in and how they can help make it a better place. One thing Ishmael points out is humans existed for millions of
years without the modern view of civilisation. It was not until the 'modern world' was introduced that earth began to 'suffer'. The damage that came
about due to the 'modern world' Ishmael has a solution. His answer to it is to move on from what he calls a "taker" society to a "leaver" society. To
move from the view that the world was made for man to the view that man

Analysis of the Novel Ishmael by Daniel Quinn Essay
Ishmael begins when the nameless narrator finds a newspaper ad that reads: "Teacher seeks pupil. Must have an earnest desire to save the world.
Apply in person" (4).
At first, he is angry, as it reminds him of the counterculture movement of the 1960s, which he participated in only to discover that there was no easy
way to save the world.
Nonetheless, he responds to the ad, and finds that the teacher is a gorilla. Behind the gorilla is a sign that reads "With man gone, will there be hope
for gorilla?" (9).
The gorilla, named Ishmael, can communicate telepathically. Communicating with him in this fashion, the narrator learns Ishmael's background – in
which the gorilla was stolen from the wild and displayed in a menagerie, then rescued by a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To hep understand how Takers pass along their story, Ishmael introduces a figure named MotherCulture, who he insists reinforces the story through
every facet of Taker society. Takers assume that humans are the pinnacles of evolution, and that the world was made for man. This belief has led to
catastrophic results, yet the Taker story allows man to blame to gods. They believe the gods wishes man to be in control, and so if man is
fundamentally flawed, then the gods are responsible for engendering the situation. Ishmael refuses to accept this premise, saying that the only thing
wrong with humans is that the story that they insist on enacting puts them at odds with the world.
Ishmael and the narrator also work to establish some immutable laws of life and species that have allowed the world to survive for this long. They
agree that a law of limited competition exists amongst all species on Earth, and only man has taken exception to that law. In short, this law suggests
that any species may protect and look out for itself, but cannot wipe out another species. A natural food chain must persist.
Ishmael next discusses the Genesis origin stories – of Adam and Eve, and of Cain and Abel – to explore the meaning of the Taker story, and how it
historically worked against the Leaver civilizations. He claims that the Fall of Man story was actually developed by Leavers to explain why the Takers
started

The By Daniel Quinn 's ' Ishmael, And Plato 's Allegory Of...
Captivity is a subject that has been discussed thoroughly by many people. Captivity is the main concept touched in Daniel Quinn's novel, Ishmael, and
Plato's Allegory of the Cave. Plato makes the compelling argument that people are captives of the world of ignorance. Ishmael complements Plato's
allegory by agreeing that there are two groups of people, that it would be difficult to distinguish the truth, and that people are being deceived. Plato and
Ishmael were both able to indicate that there are two groups of people. In his allegory, Plato had described a cave with human beings living in it,
"they cannot move, and can only see before them..between the fire and the prisoners there is a raised way.."(DiYanni 406). He said that these
people were prisoners who were left to believe that the shadows casted before them were the real truth. But the second group was people out of the
cave. Similarly, Ishmael described that there were groups of people in the "cave" and out of it. "The world of the Takers is one vast prison, and
except for a handful of Leavers scattered across the world.." (Quinn 251). Ishmael has defined these two groups as Takers and Leavers. The Takers
being those who are chained in the cave believing the–world–was–made–for–their–conquering shadow. To further explain the difference between
people in the cave and people out of it, Quinn uses modern culture. "You call yourselves civilized and all the rest primitive...the people of London and
Paris and Baghdad

Examples Of Postlapsarian Language In City Of Glass
Prof. Dr. HerzogenrathDiana Burdeos Matriculation No.
Take–home essay
TASK: Describe the different concepts of prelapsarian and postlapsarian language in the 'City of Glass'.
1. Introduction
1.1 Plot Summary
2. Postlapsarian Concepts in 'City of Glass'
2.1 Daniel Quin
2.2 Peter Stillman Jr.
2.3 New York
3. Prelapsarian concepts in 'City of Glass'
3.1 Stillman Sr.
1. Introduction
The significance of language is a broad theme in the 'Г‡ity of Glass'. The detective fiction novel 'Г‡ity of Glass' written by Paul Auster portrays
different concepts of prelapsarian and postlapsarian language.
Which are revealed through characters, such as Daniel Quinn, Peter Stillman Jr., Peter Stillman Sr., but also throughout the novel's setting in New York
painting a picture of the broken people living in New York and the frailty of the city itself.
1.1 Plot Summary
Daniel Quinn the novel's protagonist was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whenever he pretends to be Max Power's, he completely soaks into his role and forgets the insecurities of Daniel Quinn, the person he actually is. The
day he meets Virginia and Peter Stillman, he pretends to be 'Paul Auster' and once he gets uncomfortable in Virginia's presence he slips into his own
fictional creation Max Work and "[...] thought what Max Work would have been thinking, had he been there." (Glass 14) One can argue that Quinn is a
postlapsarian character, because the connection between "signifier" and "signified" is disrupted. The more he gets involved into the case of
protecting Peter Stillman, the more he becomes Max Work and forgets who he really is. He had become a "triad of selves" (Glass 9) and by

adapting many personalities at once Quinn loses his sense for reality. In the end he is no one and the reader is left to decide what has happened to

Book Summary: My Ishmael By Daniel Quinn
Ishmael the Gorilla In the novel My Ishmael, Daniel Quinn uses methods to help develop a deeper understanding. Methods he uses are the character
of Ishmael, and the maieutic method of teaching. The device of using Ishmael explores Ishmael being a gorilla, telopathic and Ishmael being a caged
animal. The maieutic method helps Julie understand through experiences. Quinn uses Ishmael as one of the main character to help develop a deeper
thinking of the novel for the readers. Quinn choose the device of using an animal to explore the novel's subject because, Ishmael is more directly
impacted by the habitat lose then humans are. Ishmael also has much more to lose due to human failures. Gorillas are also known to be smart animals
and kind of similar

The Good And Bad Teacher In Ishmael By Daniel Quinn
On the first day of school, the first thing that comes to a student's mind is what teacher they are going to have and if they are a good teacher or not.
No student wants a teacher who is extremely difficult and makes the class teach themselves the material instead of teaching it to them completely. A
good teacher makes their students reflect on their work and leaves time in class for discussion of thoughts and ideas the students may have about a
certain topic or story. On the other hand, a bad teacher doesn't give their students feedback and leaves them wondering whether they are on the right
path with their ideas and thoughts. A bad teacher does not hand his students what they need to learn or know, nor is he ever present when a student
needs help. However, some teachers can have both good and bad attributes. In the novel Ishmael by Daniel Quinn, Ishmael the gorilla takes on the role
of a teacher after placing an ad in the local newspaper calling forth any citizen with a desire to save the world. Eventually he is approached by the
narrator who is interested in the ad, and Ishmael begins teaching him all there is to know about the takers and the leavers culture. Ishmael is not a
normal teacher, and teaches the narrator the important lessons through different methods because he thinks people rely too much on the teachers who
spend their lives simply passing knowledge on to their students without a second thought. Although Ishmael may come across to some as a bad teacher,
he

The Takers And The Leavers By Daniel Quinn
The story begins with Daniel Quinn writing about a day in his life, until he comes upon an absurd advertisement in the personals section of the
newspaper: TEACHER seeks pupil. Must have an earnest desire to save the world. Apply in person. Suspicious, Quinn investigates this advertisement
with intentions of exposing fraud. Instead, he discovers Ishmael in Room 105 of a undistinguished office building. Sitting calmly, Ishmael gently
nibbled on a slender branch. Appalled, Quinn stumbled towards the chair. Ishmael and Quinn gazed into each other's eyes, and much to his
disgruntlement, the glowing eyes spoke to him. Nodding his head to the unspoken question, Ishmael quietly said, "I am the teacher." Ishmael explains
that Quinn is part of a culture, that results in him being taught certain stories between the relationships of man, the world, and the Gods. These
explanations will be made clearer to the pupil by being assisted in recognizing why the stories are misleading. Ishmael's goal will show the narrator
that human history comes from two groups, the Takers and the Leavers. These groups legislate two completely different stories about man, the world,
and the Gods. Takers are the humans who developedagriculture and civilization, who still dominate on Earth today. The Leavers, in contradiction, are
those who don't adopt agricultural practices and disregard the benefits of civilization.
In lessons, Ishmael asks Quinn to explain other stories that the Takers imagine. The pupil

How Does Agriculture Affect Ishmael's Life
Ishmael talks in the novel about the agriculture. The agriculture is the revolution that people in the past and they starting growing their own food. The
people according to Ishmael when they did this revolution they change their life and they change the world with it. When the people did that the start
living in the land that have a lot of water. They start killing the animal there. They kill a lot of animal and they start to make technology. They have
machine for everything they do. They start to examination the animals when they invent new medicine or something like that. According to Ismael the
agriculture changes the people life and they become taker society. The takers start to go to the leavers society and make them follow them

Complexity in American Education Control Essay
Complexity in American Education Control Often times, we hear the words complex and complicated used interchangeably. In fact, out of curiosity, I
highlighted the two words in Microsoft Word after typing them in the previous sentence and looked at the synonyms provided. Oddly enough,
complex is synonymous with words such as multifaceted and intricate. Yet, when I pulled up the synonyms for complicated, complex was the first
word listed. What is complexity? How does it differ from complicated issues? Complicated systems are exactly what Microsoft Word said. They are
multifaceted and intricate. They have several parts, but there is only one determined way for these systems to work. This means that a change in one
area will always create a... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Spring (2014) introduced the issue as a complicated question, but I think it is more complex. Who controls American education? More importantly, who
should control American education?
My obvious choice would be the teachers, but after much debate, I'm not sure that is the best solution. Whoever controls what should be taught in
public schools also chooses what morals and behaviors to teach students. I can remember as a child, teachers would tell my mother that they wished
they had a whole classroom of kids like me. Sure, I was bright. But more importantly, I was quiet and well–behaved. Not all teachers think this way, but
a majority would rather have students to not speak or move during class. Is that what we want the future of America to be? I don't know about you, but
I want to raise a generation that will stand for what they believe in, form their own opinions, and think critically.
Don't get me wrong. I don't believe it is the intention of any teacher to actually constrain a child from obtaining the education they want. But with the
standards they have to meet and the laws in place, it makes teaching easier to have cooperative students. As Ishmael says in Daniel Quinn's book, My
Ishmael, " What one sees first is how far short real schooling falls from the ideal of 'young minds being awakened.' Teachers for the most part would be
delighted to awaken young minds, but the system within which they must work fundamentally frustrates

Essay about Ishmael
Ishmael Daniel Quinn's Ishmael is the story of one man's quest for knowledge and his desire to "save the world". Answering a simple ad in the
paper of a teacher looking for students (p4), the narrator is sent on an incredible philosophical journey. The teacher our narrator expects is not that
which he finds, however, as our titular character Ishmael, so aptly named by Walter Sokolow (p18) as he sensed the gorilla's almost divine presence,
is that teacher. This teaching is made possible by Ishmael's miraculous telepathic way of communication (p21). Ishmael's name, originally Goliath due
his size and presumed demeanor (p14), I find incredibly fitting as he, like Abraham's eldest son, appears to be sent from the heavens though in this...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Leavers do not exempt themselves from the laws of competition while the Takers do. The Takers, in exempting themselves from these laws,
exterminate and remove all forms of competition in their way. In a lesson where the narrator role–plays as a Taker trying to convince Ishmael, a
Leaver, to live his life–style (p222) he comes upon the conclusion that being human is living on your own terms rather than the gods' and this is what
separates us from the animals (p225). It is Mother Culture who teaches this since the day we're born (p37), that we should live on our own terms rather
than the gods' and that we know good and evil and evil is living by chance. Thus, Takers are on a quest to find the one right way to do things and
hence all our laws and such contrivances come into being. Controlling the world and the universe is the primary goal of the Takers so they no longer
have to live in any sort of fear and as such they are a culture of the new whereas the Leavers are a culture of tradition (p205). Quinn relates "culture"
to a mother because of its nurturing qualities and "among Leaver peoples, Mother Culture explains and preserves a life–style that is healthy and
self–sustaining. Among Taker peoples she explains and preserves a life–style that has proven to be unhealthy and self–destructive" (p148). That
explanation is what sets the two groups in

Ishmael Identity

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Nancy Jarjis

More from Nancy Jarjis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Ishmael Identity