Gravitational quantum mechanics: a theory for explaining spacetime. This a seminar on several scientific papers about quantum gravity Phenomenology which has been gathered several important outcomes.
2. Content
The Quest for Quantum Gravity, Phenomenology
Examples of Phenomenological Models for Quantum
Gravity
Minimal Length & Maximal Momentum, Minimal
Momentum & Maximal Length
2
3. Content
Some Fundamental Features of this Gravitational Quantum Mechanics
Kernel Functions
• Particle-like Approach
• Wave-like Approach
Generalized Feynman Path Integrals
• Particle-like Approach
• Wave-like Approach
Generalized Feynman Path Integral and Some Thermodynamical Properties of an Ideal Gas
3
4. The Quest for Quantum
Gravity, Phenomenology
An introduction
4
5. The Quest for Quantum Gravity, Phenomenology
General theory of relativity
The standard model of particle
physics
General relativity has so far refused
to be quantized!
An entirely classical theory
The result of its quantizing is non-
renormalizable
There are three main reasons why
the present status requires a
solutions:
Superposition states
Singularities
The black hole information loss
problem
5
This does not mean that one necessarily
obtains quantum gravity by quantizing
gravity.
6. The Quest for Quantum Gravity, Phenomenology
Quantum particles can exist
in superposition states.
• These particles
respectively, carry energy
and thus gravitate.
• What their gravitational field
is: as a classical field it does
not exist in superpositions.
6
We don’t know what is the
gravitational field of a quantum
superposition.
7. The Quest for Quantum Gravity, Phenomenology
General relativity predicts
the formation of
singularities.
• Infinite energy density and
gravitational forces
• Unphysical and signal a
breakdown of the theory
• Requiring a more
fundamental theory!
7
General relativity predicts its
own breakdown: Singularities
8. The Quest for Quantum Gravity, Phenomenology
The black hole information loss
problem
• Black holes emit thermal radiation
• Any distribution with the same initial
mass that collapsed to a black hole
would eventually be converted into
the same thermal final state
• Detailed information contained in the
initial configuration would have
gotten lost
• Incompatible with quantum
mechanics
8
Black holes seem to destroy
information, and we don’t know how
that is compatible with quantum
mechanics.
9. The Quest for Quantum Gravity, Phenomenology
Planck scale
The scale at which effects of
quantum gravity are expected to
become relevant
Energy, length and time
To estimate the Planck scale:
An amount of energy, 𝐸, in a
volume of size ∆𝑥3
Via Einstein’s field equations:
Consider the energy to be localized
as good as quantum mechanics
possibly allows us
To its Compton wavelength:
This distortion will become non-
negligible when
9
10. The Quest for Quantum Gravity, Phenomenology
This mass scale, which
corresponds to the Planck mass
and the related Compton
wavelength, the Planck length:
10
11. The Quest for Quantum Gravity, Phenomenology
Quantum gravity: any approach
that is able to resolve the
apparent tension between
general relativity and quantum
field theories, and to address
the three problems mentioned
above.
11
We will refer as ‘quantum gravity’ to any
attempted solution of these problems.
12. Phenomenological Models
A phenomenological model:
An extension of a known theory
that allows one to compute effects
of specific additional features
Bridges the gap between theory
and experiment
It guides the development of the
theory by allowing to test general
properties
Not itself a fundamental theory
and therefore not entirely
self-contained
12
The first requirement for a good
phenomenological model is of course that it
be in agreement with already available data
and that it be internally consistent.
14. Examples of Phenomenological Models for Quantum Gravity
Violations of Lorentz Invariance
Does the ground state of spacetime
obey Lorentz-invariance?
If Lorentz-invariance was broken,
observer-independence would be
explicitly violated and a preferred
frame would be singled out.
The matter sector of the standard
model or the gravitational sector
In the purely gravitational sector:
by coupling a tensor field, or its
derivatives respectively, to the
metric or the curvature
Einstein-Aether theory
In the standard model sector:
additional terms to the standard
model Lagrangian breaking the
symmetry
Modified dispersion relations
14
15. Examples of Phenomenological Models for Quantum Gravity
Deformations of Special Relativity
The possibility that special relativity
may be modified in the high energy
regime
The modified Lorentz-
transformations in momentum
space have two invariants: the
speed of light and the Planck mass
Results:
Generalized uncertainty
Curved momentum space
Modified dispersion relation
An energy-dependent speed of
light
15
16. Examples of Phenomenological Models for Quantum Gravity
Minimal Length and Generalized
Uncertainty
There are several thought
experiments for probing smallest
distances that lead one to conclude
the non-negligible perturbations of
the background geometry close by
the Planck scale
Incorporating a minimal length into
quantum mechanics and quantum
field theory results in:
Generalized uncertainty principle
Prevents an arbitrarily good
localization in position space
Modified dispersion relation
Modified measure in momentum
space
Can be understood as a non-trivial
geometry of momentum space
May or may not have an energy-
dependent speed of light
Break Lorentz-invariance explicitly
16
17. Examples of Phenomenological Models for Quantum Gravity
Causal Sets
Space-time foam and granularity
Geometrogenesis
Loop Quantum Cosmology
String Cosmology
The Arkani-Hamed-Dimopoulos-Dvali Model
The Randall-Sundrum Model
17
20. Minimal Length & Maximal Momentum, Minimal
Momentum & Maximal Length
Minimal Length
Heisenberg uncertainty principle:
From the Heisenberg’s Electron
Microscope Gedanken Experiment
But he had disregarded the
gravitational interaction of the photons
with electron
Gravity is coupled to everything
20
21. Minimal Length & Maximal Momentum, Minimal
Momentum & Maximal Length
Minimal Length
The more carefully probing electron position the more
energetic photons so, the more gravitational interaction
Planck scale
So, an extra position uncertainty due to the gravitational
contribution of very high energy beams:
Then HUP turns into GUP:
21
A nontrivial assumption:
The minimal length = A nonzero
uncertainty in position measurement
22. Minimal Length & Maximal Momentum, Minimal
Momentum & Maximal Length
Minimal Length
The common form of GUP in the
presence of minimal length:
The modified Heisenberg algebra:
22
23. Minimal Length & Maximal Momentum, Minimal
Momentum & Maximal Length
Minimal Length & Minimal
Momentum
The existence of minimum position
and minimum momentum
uncertainty leads to:
And a phase space commutator in
one dimension of the form:
23
24. Minimal Length & Maximal Momentum, Minimal
Momentum & Maximal Length
Minimal Length & Maximal Momentum
The modified Heisenberg algebra in DSR theories:
By asymptotic expression to first order:
Corresponding Heisenberg algebra for this type of GUP:
24
A minimal measurable
length leads to a maximum
measurable momentum of
the order of the Planck
momentum which is an
upper bound on test particle
momentum
25. Minimal Length & Maximal Momentum, Minimal
Momentum & Maximal Length
Explicit Maxima and Minima in both
Position and Momentum Uncertainties
A GUP of the form
25
26. Some Fundamental
Features of a
Gravitational Quantum
Mechanics
Some basic notions of a gravitational quantum
mechanics
26
27. Some Fundamental Features of a Gravitational Quantum
Mechanics
Define the operators P and X:
The generalized identity operator:
The generalization of the scalar
product of momentum eigenstates:
A maximal momentum cutoff
the bounds of integrals over p
change from to
Position space representation
should be modified
Quasi-position space:
27
28. Some Fundamental Features of a Gravitational Quantum
Mechanics
Standard quantum mechanics
Absolute localization = Absolute
accuracy in the position
measurements
Commutative spacetime
With effects of gravity in the
ultraviolet regime
Maximally localized up to the
minimal length
Non-commutative structure of
spacetime:
We can not build a Hilbert space
on the position space wave
functions
because there is no longer a zero
uncertainty in position
There can not be any physical state
as a position eigenstate
Ordinary position space
representation is no longer
applicable
28
29. Some Fundamental Features of a Gravitational Quantum
Mechanics
Quasi-position space representation
Maximal localization states
Localizability limited to the minimum measurable distance
Momentum space wave functions of the states that are maximally localized:
29
30. Some Fundamental Features of a Gravitational Quantum
Mechanics
By projecting arbitrary states on maximally localized states, we can define the
state’s quasi-position wave function
probability amplitude for the particle being maximally localized around x
The transformation of a momentum space wave function into a quasi-position
space wave function:
30
31. Some Fundamental Features of a Gravitational Quantum
Mechanics
the transformation of a quasi-position space wave function into a momentum
space wave function:
Modified wave number in quasi-position space:
31
32. Some Fundamental Features of a Gravitational Quantum
Mechanics
Modified wave length in quasi-position space:
From the de Broglie relation:
Modified form of the frequency in the quasi-position space
32
33. Some Fundamental Features of a Gravitational Quantum
Mechanics
Modified Planck relation in quasi-position space:
Quasi-energy
Responsible for the time evolution of quasi-position wave functions
Time-dependent wave function in quasi-position space evolves as
33
35. Kernel Functions
A general definition of kernel
functions K
Standard quantum mechanics, a
definition of propagator:
Probability amplitude to find a
point particle in the position 𝑥𝑓 at
the time 𝑡𝑓, while initially it was in
the position 𝑥𝑖 at the time 𝑡𝑖
In the quasi-position formalism:
Generalized form of propagator in
the gravitational quantum
mechanics
Using identity operator:
35
36. Kernel Functions
The modified Kernel function depends on the form of energy 𝐸 𝑝
Particle-like
Wave-like
It is possible to construct a path integral even in the wave-like approach due to
the presence of natural cutoffs
36
37. Kernel Functions: Particle-like Approach
With the modified form of the energy inspired by the quasi-momentum
By some calculations (!!!)
37
38. Kernel Functions: Wave-like Approach
With the modified form of the Planck relation:
An explicit relation for wave-like kernel function due to existence of these cutoffs
38
40. Generalized Feynman Path Integrals
The kernel function K can provide a new formulation which was presented by
Feynman; the path integral formalism:
40
41. Generalized Feynman Path Integrals
Modifications of Feynman path integral in the Planck scale
By using the maximally localized states:
We see that each expression is of the form:
Again we have particle-like and wave-like approaches
41
42. Generalized Feynman Path Integrals: Particle-like Approach
By using of the generalized energy relation with respect to quasi-momentum:
An important outcome:
42
43. Generalized Feynman Path Integrals: Particle-like Approach
Generalized form of the Feynman path integral in the presence of these cutoffs in
a gravitational quantum mechanics:
43
44. Generalized Feynman Path Integrals: Wave-like Approach
By using of the generalized energy relation with respect to quasi-energy:
Feynman path integral of a free particle in the wavelike approach where
quantum gravitational effects
44
45. Generalized Feynman
Path Integral and Some
Thermodynamical
Properties of an Ideal
Gas
Using of generalized path integral to modify
Thermodynamical parameter
45
46. Generalized Feynman Path Integral and Some
Thermodynamical Properties of an Ideal Gas
Partition function of n-particle systems in position space
The connection between the Euclidean path integral and statistical mechanics
Replacing the time variable t with the Euclidean time τ
A modified partition function from a modified path integral:
46
47. Generalized Feynman Path Integral and Some
Thermodynamical Properties of an Ideal Gas
The modified partition function for a bosonic ideal gas N particles:
47
49. Chemical Potential
Chemical Potential:
49
The solid thick curve
represents the
chemical potential in
the classical
theory
50. Entropy
Using the expression for the free energy:
Entropy of an ideal gas in the presence of natural cutoffs:
50
51. Specific Heat
Specific heat in a constant volume:
51
The solid thick curve
represents the
chemical potential in
the classical
theory
52. Internal Energy
Having the expressions for the free energy and entropy:
Internal energy U in the presence of natural cutoffs:
The value of internal energy of an ideal gas is not divergent
52
آزمایش میکروسکوپ هایزنبرگ که دیدن یک الکترون با تاباندن نور به دورن محفظهی آن است و به دلیل داشتن خطا در اندازهگیری مکان و تکانهی الکترون به رابطه عدم قطعیت میٰرسیم. ولی گرانش به همه چیز جفت شده است و پس یه ترم به دلیل برهمکنش گرانشی فوتون و الکترون باید اضافه شود.
ایکس بزرگ عملگر مکان در انرژیهای بالا و ایکس کوچیک عملگر مکان در انرژیهای کم است. چون مفهوم نقطه نداریم و عدم قطعیت کمینه داریم نمایش فضای مکان نداریم. ما به جای فضای مکان از فضای شبه-مکان استفاده میکنیم که بازتعریفی از فضای مکان است.
تابع موج هر فضا تابعی است که دارای عدم قطعیت صفر در مولفهی همان فضا است.
چشم داشتی تکانه صفر است.
یک تبدیل فوریه است.
در تبدیل عکس فوریه، ای به توان آی کا ایکس را داشتیم و پس کا به دست میآید.
از دو رابطهی تبدیلات و جایگذاری در این رابطهی آخر و استفاده از معادلهی پایین خواهیم داشت:
از رابطهی پی به توان تقسیم بر ۲ ام استفاده میکنیم و به جای انرژی میگذاریم.
در آلفا به سمت به رابطه عادی ابتدا میرسیم. میتوان رابطهی آخر را بسط داد...
رابطهی آخر به دو بخش موهومی و حقیقی با استفاده از رابطهی اویلر تبدیل میشود.
در اینجا به عنوان نتیجهای دیگر از وجود برشهای طبیعی، در این نظریه ما بر خلاف کوانتوم عادی، تابع کرنل موج-گونه داریم.
So, unlike the ordinary quantum mechanics, we were ableto construct a path integral in the wave-like approach thanks to the presence of natural cutoffs.This is another new result due to the presence of natural cutoffs.
We consider an ensemble system at thermodynamical equilibriumwith energy spectrum of microstates as {En}
Note also thatthe classical, non-deformed chemical potential is negative at sufficiently high temperature. Inthe presence of natural cutoffs this is not the case and chemical potential is always positive.Positivity of the chemical potential means that the change in Helmholtz free energy when aparticle is added to the system (here the ideal gas) is positive.
In the presence of natural cutoffs and for small valuesof β, the specific heat is not constant rather asymptotically increases to predicted value of theclassical model in low temperature.