research sampling
Sampling is the process
of selecting observations
(a sample) to provide an
adequate description
and inferences of the
population.
Sampling is the process
of selecting a number of
individuals for a study in
such a way that the
individuals represent the
larger group from which
they were selected.
Sampling is the act,
process, or technique of
selecting a suitable sample,
or a representative part of
a population for the
purpose of determining
parameters or
characteristics of the whole
population.
5
sampling
target population
study population
sample
A sample is “a smaller
(but hopefully
representative) collection
of units from a
population used to
determine truths about
that population” (Field, 2015)
research sampling
research sampling
Population is the larger
group from which
individuals are selected to
participate in a study
SAMPLING BREAKDOWN
All universities in the Philippines
All universities in Cebu
List of Cebu universities
Three universities in Cebu
• When it’s impossible to study the whole population
why just a sample?
• Cost efficient
• More accuracy of results
• High speed of data collection
• Availability of Population elements.
• Less field time
The sample must be:
what is a good sample?
representative of the population;
appropriately sized;
unbiased;
random.
Stages in the
Selection
of a Sample
quantitative
sampling
quantitative
sampling
probability
sampling
non-probability
sampling
probability
sampling
simple
random
stratified
random
cluster systematic
simple random sampling
Applicable when population is small,
homogeneous & readily available
simple random sampling
Selecting subjects so that all members of a
population have an equal and independent
chance of being selected.
simple random sampling
All subsets of the frame are given an equal
probability. Each element of the frame has an
equal probability of selection. A table of
random number or lottery system is used to
determine which units are to be selected.
simple random sampling
Advantages
• Easy method to use
• No need of prior information of population
• Equal and independent chance of selection to
every element
• High probability of achieving a representative
sample
• Meets assumptions of many statistical
procedures
simple random sampling
Disadvantages
• If sampling frame large, this method
impracticable.
• Does not represent proportionate
representation
• Identification of all members of the
population can be difficult
• Identifying members of all subgroups can be
difficult
selecting random samples
Define
population
Develop
sampling
frame
Assign
each unit a
number
Randomly
select the
required
amount of
random
numbers
Systematically
select random
numbers until
it meets the
sample size
requirements
Sunil Kumar
simple random sampling
Every subset of a specified size n from the population
has an equal chance of being selected
Sunil Kumar
stratified random sampling
The population is divided into two or
more groups, called strata, according
to some criterion, such as geographic
location, grade level, age, or income,
and subsamples are randomly selected
from each strata.
stratified random sampling
Identify and
define the
population
Determine the
desired
sample size
Identify the
variable and
subgroups (i.e.,
strata) for which
you want to
guarantee
appropriate
representation
Classify all
members of the
population as
members of one
of the identified
subgroups
stratified random sampling
stratified random sampling
Advantages
• More accurate sample
• Can be used for both proportional and non-
proportional samples
• Representation of subgroups in the sample
• Enhancement of representativeness to each
sample
• Higher statistical efficiency
• Easy to carry out
stratified random sampling
Disadvantages
• Identification of all members of the
population can be difficult
• Identifying members of all subgroups can be
difficult
• Classification error
• Time consuming and expensive
• Prior knowledge of composition and of
distribution of population
The process of randomly selecting intact
groups, not individuals, within the
defined population sharing similar
characteristics
cluster sampling
Clusters are locations within which an intact
group of members of the population can be
found.
e.g: neighborhoods
school districts
schools
classrooms
cluster sampling
stratified random sampling
Define
population
Develop
sampling
frame
according to
characteristic
s required
Determine
the
proportion of
each
population
variable of
interest
Systematic
sampling
methods can
then be
followed to
select sample
unit
cluster sampling
Section 4
Section 5
Section 3
Section 2Section 1
Sunil Kumar
cluster sampling
Advantages
• Very useful when populations are large and spread
over a large geographic region
• Convenient and expedient
• Do not need the names of everyone in the
population
cluster sampling
Disadvantages
• Representation is likely to become an issue
cluster sampling
Selecting every Kth subject from a list of the
members of the population
systematic sampling
systematic sampling
Define
populatio
n
Develop
sampling
frame
Decide
the
sample
size
Work out
what
fraction of
the frame
the sample
size
represents
Select
according
to fraction
(100 sample
from 1,000
frame then
10% so
every 10th
unit)
First unit
select by
random
numbers
then
every nth
unit
selected
(e.g.
every
10th)
systematic sampling
k =
N
n
where
n sample size
N population size
k size of selection interval=
=
=
systematic sampling
Example:
To select a sample of 25 dorm rooms in your college dorm,
makes a list of all the room numbers in the dorm. For example
there are 100 rooms, divide the total number of rooms (100) by
the number of rooms you want in the sample (25). The answer is
4. This means that you are going to select every fourth dorm
room from the list. First of all, we have to determine the random
starting point. This step can be done by picking any point on the
table of random numbers, and read across or down until you
come to a number between 1 and 4. This is your random starting
point. For instance, your random starting point is "3". This means
you select dorm room 3 as your first room, and then every fourth
room down the list (3, 7, 11, 15, 19, etc.) until you have 25 rooms
selected.
systematic sampling
systematic sampling
Advantage
• Very easily done
Disadvantages
• Subgroups
• Some members of the population don’t
have an equal chance of being included
systematic sampling
According to Uma Sekaran in
Research Method for Business (4th
Ed, 2010), Roscoe proposed the
rules of thumb for determining
sample size where sample size
larger than 30 and less than 500
are appropriate for most research,
and the minimum size of sample
should be 30% of the population.
The size of the sample depends
on a number of factors and the
researchers have to give the
statistically information before
they can get an answer. For
example, these information like
(confidence level, standard
deviation, margin of error and
population size) to determine
the sample size.
non-probability
sampling
convenience purposive quota
convenience sampling
Also called “grab”, “opportunity”,
“accidental” or “haphazard” sampling
convenience sampling
It the process of including whoever happens
to be available at the time
convenience sampling
It is most useful for pilot testing.
convenience sampling
Advantage
A sample selected for ease of access, immediately
known population group and good response rate.
convenience sampling
Disadvantage
Cannot generalise findings (do not know what
population group the sample is representative of) so
cannot move beyond describing the sample.
convenience sampling
Disadvantage
Difficulty in determining how much of the effect
(dependent variable) results from the cause
(independent variable)
convenience sampling
Disadvantage
•Problems of reliability
•Do respondents represent the target population?
•Results are not generalizable
purposive sampling
The process whereby the researcher selects a
sample based on experience or knowledge of
the group to be sampled
purposive sampling
Also called “judgment” sampling
purposive sampling
The researcher chooses the sample based on
who they think would be appropriate for the
study.
purposive sampling
Advantage
Based on the experienced person’s judgment
Disadvantage
Cannot measure the representativeness of the
sample
The process whereby a researcher gathers
data from individuals possessing
identified characteristics and quotas
quota sampling
PROCESS
• The population is first segmented into mutually
exclusive sub-groups, just as in stratified
sampling.
• Then judgment used to select subjects or units
from each segment based on a specified
proportion.
• For example, an interviewer may be told to
sample 200 females and 300 males between the
age of 45 and 60.
quota sampling
In quota sampling the selection of the
sample is non-random.
quota sampling
Advantages
• Contains specific subgroups in the proportions
desired
• May reduce bias
• Easy to manage, quick
quota sampling
Disadvantages
• Dependent on subjective decisions
• Not possible to generalize
• Only reflects population in terms of the quota,
possibility of bias in selection, no standard
error
quota sampling
sampling in
qualitative research
Researchers in qualitative
research select their
participants according to their:
• characteristics
• knowledge
Purposeful sampling is when
the researcher chooses persons
or sites which provide specific
knowledge about the topic of
the study.
Types of Purposeful Sampling
1) Maximal Variation Sampling
2) Typical Sampling
3) Theory or Concept Sampling
4) Homogeneous Sampling
5) Critical Sampling
6) Opportunistic Sampling
7) Snowball Sampling
Types of Purposeful Sampling
1) Maximal Variation Sampling
2) Typical Sampling
3) Theory or Concept Sampling
4) Homogeneous Sampling
5) Critical Sampling
6) Opportunistic Sampling
7) Snowball Sampling
1- Maximal Variation Sampling
It is when you select individuals that
differ on a certain characteristic. In this
strategy you should first identify the
characteristic and then find individuals
or sites which display that
characteristic.
It is when you study a person or a site
that is “typical” to those unfamiliar with
the situation. You can select a typical
sample by collecting
demographic data or survey data
about all cases.
2- Typical Sampling
3-Theory or Concept Sampling
It is when you select individuals or sites
because they can help you to generate a
theory or specific concepts within the
theory. In this strategy you need a full
understanding of the concept or the theory
expected to discover during the study.
4- Homogeneous Sampling
It is when you select certain sites or
people because they possess similar
characteristics. In this strategy, you
need to identify the characteristics and
find individuals or sites that possess it.
5- Critical Sampling
It is when you study an
exceptional case represents the
central phenomenon in dramatic
terms.
6- Opportunistic Sampling
It is used after data collection
begins, when you may find that
you need to collect new
information to answer your
research questions.
7- Snowball Sampling
It is when you don't know the best people
to study because of the unfamiliarity of the
topic or the complexity of events. So you
ask participants during interviews to
suggest other individuals to be sampled.
• It is the researcher’s ethical responsibility to
safeguard the story teller by maintaining the
understood purpose of the research…
• The relationship should be based on trust
between the researcher and participants.
• Inform participants of the purpose of the
study.
Ethical Considerations in Data
Collection
• Being respectful of the research site,
reciprocity, using ethical interview
practices, maintaining privacy, and
cooperating with participants.
• Patton (2002) offered a checklist of
general ethical issues to consider, such
as:
 reciprocity
 assessment of risk
confidentiality,
informed consent
 and data access and ownership.
• Qualitative researchers must
be aware of the potential for
their own emotional turmoil in
processing this information
• During the interview process,
participants may disclose
sensitive and potentially
distressing information in the
course of the interview..
The respondents of the study were thirty (30)
PNP personnel of Iloilo City Police Office who were
assigned at Women and Children Protection Desks.
Total enumeration sampling technique or all
members of the population were participants of this
research. It has a high level of accuracy and
provides a complete statistical coverage over space
and time.
The respondents of the study were made
aware of the nature and purpose of this study and
that the identities of the respondents and data
collected would be completely confidential. (cont’d)
Monsale, Sharon S. (2016) Level of emotional empathy among women and children protection desk
personnel (Unpublished Thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
The 30 respondents were classified into age,
civil status, and length of service. As to age, 90%
(n=27) were younger, while 10% (n=3) were older.
As to civil status, 46.67% (n=14) were married, while
53.33% (n=16) were single. As to length of service,
60% (n=18) were classified in longer years, while
40% (n=12) were classified in shorter years.
Monsale, Sharon S. (2016) Level of emotional empathy among women and children protection desk
personnel (Unpublished Thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
The subject of the study is a 5-year old child
with hearing impairment and is currently enrolled in
San Joaquin, Iloilo. The subject was chosen by the
researchers.
Gaitan, L.M.B., Mediodia, M.C.A., Tabaquirao, M.J.T., Tabuga, K.F.B., Varon, M.L.T. (2014) Visual
approach in teaching functional sign language to a 5-year-old child with hearing impairment.
(Unpublished undergraduate thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
The stratified random sampling was used to
determine the number of participants using the
Slovin’s Equation to obtain a good representative
sample with 0.05 margin of error.
The fishbowl method was used to choose the
14 participants from elementary, 16 from
secondary, and 37 from the tertiary levels.
Sembran, S.J. (2010) Interpersonal conflict management styles of administrators and teachers in a
private sectarian school. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
The respondents of the study were the pre-
service teachers of West Visayas State University-
Janiuay Campus who are duly enrolled for the
second semester 2011-2012. They were grouped
according to course, sex and GPA. They were
identified through stratified random sampling.
There were 80 respondents who are the pre-
service teachers of West Visayas State University-
Janiuay Campus. These respondents were classified
into course, sex and GPA. (cont’d)
Pendon, G.P. (2012) Awareness of peace education knowledge, attitudes, values and skills (KAVS) of
pre-service teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
As to course, 75% (n=60) were Bachelor in
Elementary Education (BEED), while 25% (n=20)
were Bachelor in Secondary Education (BSED). As to
sex, 82.5% (n=66) were females and 17.5% (n=14)
were males. When classified as to GPA, 12.5 %
(n=10) respondents had high GPA, 77.5% (n=62)
had average GPA and 10% (n=8) had low GPA.
Pendon, G.P. (2012) Awareness of peace education knowledge, attitudes, values and skills (KAVS) of
pre-service teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
As to course, 75% (n=60) were Bachelor in
Elementary Education (BEED), while 25% (n=20)
were Bachelor in Secondary Education (BSED). As to
sex, 82.5% (n=66) were females and 17.5% (n=14)
were males. When classified as to GPA, 12.5 %
(n=10) respondents had high GPA, 77.5% (n=62)
had average GPA and 10% (n=8) had low GPA.
Pendon, G.P. (2012) Awareness of peace education knowledge, attitudes, values and skills (KAVS) of
pre-service teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
Subjected to analysis and comparison in this
study were the banner headlines of the student
publications of each of the seven colleges in the
main campus of West Visayas State University.
Identified for analysis and comparison were the
purposively selected most recent publications but
not earlier than issues published during the school
year 2011-2012.
Paragados, J.C. (2014) Content analysis of front-page banner headlines of college publications in a
state university. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.

Research sampling

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Sampling is theprocess of selecting observations (a sample) to provide an adequate description and inferences of the population.
  • 3.
    Sampling is theprocess of selecting a number of individuals for a study in such a way that the individuals represent the larger group from which they were selected.
  • 4.
    Sampling is theact, process, or technique of selecting a suitable sample, or a representative part of a population for the purpose of determining parameters or characteristics of the whole population.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    A sample is“a smaller (but hopefully representative) collection of units from a population used to determine truths about that population” (Field, 2015) research sampling
  • 7.
    research sampling Population isthe larger group from which individuals are selected to participate in a study
  • 8.
    SAMPLING BREAKDOWN All universitiesin the Philippines All universities in Cebu List of Cebu universities Three universities in Cebu
  • 9.
    • When it’simpossible to study the whole population why just a sample? • Cost efficient • More accuracy of results • High speed of data collection • Availability of Population elements. • Less field time
  • 10.
    The sample mustbe: what is a good sample? representative of the population; appropriately sized; unbiased; random.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 15.
  • 16.
    simple random sampling Applicablewhen population is small, homogeneous & readily available
  • 17.
    simple random sampling Selectingsubjects so that all members of a population have an equal and independent chance of being selected.
  • 18.
    simple random sampling Allsubsets of the frame are given an equal probability. Each element of the frame has an equal probability of selection. A table of random number or lottery system is used to determine which units are to be selected.
  • 19.
    simple random sampling Advantages •Easy method to use • No need of prior information of population • Equal and independent chance of selection to every element • High probability of achieving a representative sample • Meets assumptions of many statistical procedures
  • 20.
    simple random sampling Disadvantages •If sampling frame large, this method impracticable. • Does not represent proportionate representation • Identification of all members of the population can be difficult • Identifying members of all subgroups can be difficult
  • 21.
    selecting random samples Define population Develop sampling frame Assign eachunit a number Randomly select the required amount of random numbers Systematically select random numbers until it meets the sample size requirements Sunil Kumar
  • 22.
    simple random sampling Everysubset of a specified size n from the population has an equal chance of being selected Sunil Kumar
  • 23.
    stratified random sampling Thepopulation is divided into two or more groups, called strata, according to some criterion, such as geographic location, grade level, age, or income, and subsamples are randomly selected from each strata.
  • 24.
    stratified random sampling Identifyand define the population Determine the desired sample size Identify the variable and subgroups (i.e., strata) for which you want to guarantee appropriate representation Classify all members of the population as members of one of the identified subgroups
  • 25.
  • 26.
    stratified random sampling Advantages •More accurate sample • Can be used for both proportional and non- proportional samples • Representation of subgroups in the sample • Enhancement of representativeness to each sample • Higher statistical efficiency • Easy to carry out
  • 27.
    stratified random sampling Disadvantages •Identification of all members of the population can be difficult • Identifying members of all subgroups can be difficult • Classification error • Time consuming and expensive • Prior knowledge of composition and of distribution of population
  • 28.
    The process ofrandomly selecting intact groups, not individuals, within the defined population sharing similar characteristics cluster sampling
  • 29.
    Clusters are locationswithin which an intact group of members of the population can be found. e.g: neighborhoods school districts schools classrooms cluster sampling
  • 30.
    stratified random sampling Define population Develop sampling frame accordingto characteristic s required Determine the proportion of each population variable of interest Systematic sampling methods can then be followed to select sample unit
  • 31.
    cluster sampling Section 4 Section5 Section 3 Section 2Section 1 Sunil Kumar
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Advantages • Very usefulwhen populations are large and spread over a large geographic region • Convenient and expedient • Do not need the names of everyone in the population cluster sampling
  • 34.
    Disadvantages • Representation islikely to become an issue cluster sampling
  • 35.
    Selecting every Kthsubject from a list of the members of the population systematic sampling
  • 36.
    systematic sampling Define populatio n Develop sampling frame Decide the sample size Work out what fractionof the frame the sample size represents Select according to fraction (100 sample from 1,000 frame then 10% so every 10th unit) First unit select by random numbers then every nth unit selected (e.g. every 10th)
  • 37.
    systematic sampling k = N n where nsample size N population size k size of selection interval= = =
  • 38.
    systematic sampling Example: To selecta sample of 25 dorm rooms in your college dorm, makes a list of all the room numbers in the dorm. For example there are 100 rooms, divide the total number of rooms (100) by the number of rooms you want in the sample (25). The answer is 4. This means that you are going to select every fourth dorm room from the list. First of all, we have to determine the random starting point. This step can be done by picking any point on the table of random numbers, and read across or down until you come to a number between 1 and 4. This is your random starting point. For instance, your random starting point is "3". This means you select dorm room 3 as your first room, and then every fourth room down the list (3, 7, 11, 15, 19, etc.) until you have 25 rooms selected.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Advantage • Very easilydone Disadvantages • Subgroups • Some members of the population don’t have an equal chance of being included systematic sampling
  • 42.
    According to UmaSekaran in Research Method for Business (4th Ed, 2010), Roscoe proposed the rules of thumb for determining sample size where sample size larger than 30 and less than 500 are appropriate for most research, and the minimum size of sample should be 30% of the population.
  • 43.
    The size ofthe sample depends on a number of factors and the researchers have to give the statistically information before they can get an answer. For example, these information like (confidence level, standard deviation, margin of error and population size) to determine the sample size.
  • 44.
  • 45.
    convenience sampling Also called“grab”, “opportunity”, “accidental” or “haphazard” sampling
  • 46.
    convenience sampling It theprocess of including whoever happens to be available at the time
  • 47.
    convenience sampling It ismost useful for pilot testing.
  • 48.
    convenience sampling Advantage A sampleselected for ease of access, immediately known population group and good response rate.
  • 49.
    convenience sampling Disadvantage Cannot generalisefindings (do not know what population group the sample is representative of) so cannot move beyond describing the sample.
  • 50.
    convenience sampling Disadvantage Difficulty indetermining how much of the effect (dependent variable) results from the cause (independent variable)
  • 51.
    convenience sampling Disadvantage •Problems ofreliability •Do respondents represent the target population? •Results are not generalizable
  • 52.
    purposive sampling The processwhereby the researcher selects a sample based on experience or knowledge of the group to be sampled
  • 53.
    purposive sampling Also called“judgment” sampling
  • 54.
    purposive sampling The researcherchooses the sample based on who they think would be appropriate for the study.
  • 55.
    purposive sampling Advantage Based onthe experienced person’s judgment Disadvantage Cannot measure the representativeness of the sample
  • 56.
    The process wherebya researcher gathers data from individuals possessing identified characteristics and quotas quota sampling
  • 57.
    PROCESS • The populationis first segmented into mutually exclusive sub-groups, just as in stratified sampling. • Then judgment used to select subjects or units from each segment based on a specified proportion. • For example, an interviewer may be told to sample 200 females and 300 males between the age of 45 and 60. quota sampling
  • 58.
    In quota samplingthe selection of the sample is non-random. quota sampling
  • 59.
    Advantages • Contains specificsubgroups in the proportions desired • May reduce bias • Easy to manage, quick quota sampling
  • 60.
    Disadvantages • Dependent onsubjective decisions • Not possible to generalize • Only reflects population in terms of the quota, possibility of bias in selection, no standard error quota sampling
  • 61.
  • 62.
    Researchers in qualitative researchselect their participants according to their: • characteristics • knowledge
  • 63.
    Purposeful sampling iswhen the researcher chooses persons or sites which provide specific knowledge about the topic of the study.
  • 64.
    Types of PurposefulSampling 1) Maximal Variation Sampling 2) Typical Sampling 3) Theory or Concept Sampling 4) Homogeneous Sampling 5) Critical Sampling 6) Opportunistic Sampling 7) Snowball Sampling
  • 65.
    Types of PurposefulSampling 1) Maximal Variation Sampling 2) Typical Sampling 3) Theory or Concept Sampling 4) Homogeneous Sampling 5) Critical Sampling 6) Opportunistic Sampling 7) Snowball Sampling
  • 66.
    1- Maximal VariationSampling It is when you select individuals that differ on a certain characteristic. In this strategy you should first identify the characteristic and then find individuals or sites which display that characteristic.
  • 67.
    It is whenyou study a person or a site that is “typical” to those unfamiliar with the situation. You can select a typical sample by collecting demographic data or survey data about all cases. 2- Typical Sampling
  • 68.
    3-Theory or ConceptSampling It is when you select individuals or sites because they can help you to generate a theory or specific concepts within the theory. In this strategy you need a full understanding of the concept or the theory expected to discover during the study.
  • 69.
    4- Homogeneous Sampling Itis when you select certain sites or people because they possess similar characteristics. In this strategy, you need to identify the characteristics and find individuals or sites that possess it.
  • 70.
    5- Critical Sampling Itis when you study an exceptional case represents the central phenomenon in dramatic terms.
  • 71.
    6- Opportunistic Sampling Itis used after data collection begins, when you may find that you need to collect new information to answer your research questions.
  • 72.
    7- Snowball Sampling Itis when you don't know the best people to study because of the unfamiliarity of the topic or the complexity of events. So you ask participants during interviews to suggest other individuals to be sampled.
  • 73.
    • It isthe researcher’s ethical responsibility to safeguard the story teller by maintaining the understood purpose of the research… • The relationship should be based on trust between the researcher and participants. • Inform participants of the purpose of the study. Ethical Considerations in Data Collection
  • 74.
    • Being respectfulof the research site, reciprocity, using ethical interview practices, maintaining privacy, and cooperating with participants. • Patton (2002) offered a checklist of general ethical issues to consider, such as:  reciprocity  assessment of risk confidentiality, informed consent  and data access and ownership.
  • 75.
    • Qualitative researchersmust be aware of the potential for their own emotional turmoil in processing this information • During the interview process, participants may disclose sensitive and potentially distressing information in the course of the interview..
  • 76.
    The respondents ofthe study were thirty (30) PNP personnel of Iloilo City Police Office who were assigned at Women and Children Protection Desks. Total enumeration sampling technique or all members of the population were participants of this research. It has a high level of accuracy and provides a complete statistical coverage over space and time. The respondents of the study were made aware of the nature and purpose of this study and that the identities of the respondents and data collected would be completely confidential. (cont’d) Monsale, Sharon S. (2016) Level of emotional empathy among women and children protection desk personnel (Unpublished Thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
  • 77.
    The 30 respondentswere classified into age, civil status, and length of service. As to age, 90% (n=27) were younger, while 10% (n=3) were older. As to civil status, 46.67% (n=14) were married, while 53.33% (n=16) were single. As to length of service, 60% (n=18) were classified in longer years, while 40% (n=12) were classified in shorter years. Monsale, Sharon S. (2016) Level of emotional empathy among women and children protection desk personnel (Unpublished Thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
  • 78.
    The subject ofthe study is a 5-year old child with hearing impairment and is currently enrolled in San Joaquin, Iloilo. The subject was chosen by the researchers. Gaitan, L.M.B., Mediodia, M.C.A., Tabaquirao, M.J.T., Tabuga, K.F.B., Varon, M.L.T. (2014) Visual approach in teaching functional sign language to a 5-year-old child with hearing impairment. (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
  • 79.
    The stratified randomsampling was used to determine the number of participants using the Slovin’s Equation to obtain a good representative sample with 0.05 margin of error. The fishbowl method was used to choose the 14 participants from elementary, 16 from secondary, and 37 from the tertiary levels. Sembran, S.J. (2010) Interpersonal conflict management styles of administrators and teachers in a private sectarian school. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
  • 80.
    The respondents ofthe study were the pre- service teachers of West Visayas State University- Janiuay Campus who are duly enrolled for the second semester 2011-2012. They were grouped according to course, sex and GPA. They were identified through stratified random sampling. There were 80 respondents who are the pre- service teachers of West Visayas State University- Janiuay Campus. These respondents were classified into course, sex and GPA. (cont’d) Pendon, G.P. (2012) Awareness of peace education knowledge, attitudes, values and skills (KAVS) of pre-service teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
  • 81.
    As to course,75% (n=60) were Bachelor in Elementary Education (BEED), while 25% (n=20) were Bachelor in Secondary Education (BSED). As to sex, 82.5% (n=66) were females and 17.5% (n=14) were males. When classified as to GPA, 12.5 % (n=10) respondents had high GPA, 77.5% (n=62) had average GPA and 10% (n=8) had low GPA. Pendon, G.P. (2012) Awareness of peace education knowledge, attitudes, values and skills (KAVS) of pre-service teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
  • 82.
    As to course,75% (n=60) were Bachelor in Elementary Education (BEED), while 25% (n=20) were Bachelor in Secondary Education (BSED). As to sex, 82.5% (n=66) were females and 17.5% (n=14) were males. When classified as to GPA, 12.5 % (n=10) respondents had high GPA, 77.5% (n=62) had average GPA and 10% (n=8) had low GPA. Pendon, G.P. (2012) Awareness of peace education knowledge, attitudes, values and skills (KAVS) of pre-service teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.
  • 83.
    Subjected to analysisand comparison in this study were the banner headlines of the student publications of each of the seven colleges in the main campus of West Visayas State University. Identified for analysis and comparison were the purposively selected most recent publications but not earlier than issues published during the school year 2011-2012. Paragados, J.C. (2014) Content analysis of front-page banner headlines of college publications in a state university. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Iloilo City: WVSU Publishing.

Editor's Notes

  • #6 A population can be defined as including all people or items with the characteristic one wishes to understand. Because there is very rarely enough time or money to gather information from everyone or everything in a population, the goal becomes finding a representative sample (or subset) of that population.
  • #11 (the larger the better) (selections occur by chance);
  • #47 For example, if the interviewer was to conduct a survey at a shopping center early in the morning on a given day, the people that he/she could interview would be limited to those given there at that given time, which would not represent the views of other members of society in such an area, if the survey was to be conducted at different times of day and several times per week.
  • #49 AG Nielsen, popularity survey, network wars
  • #55 This is used primarily when there is a limited number of people that have expertise in the area being researched
  • #59 For example interviewers might be tempted to interview those who look most helpful. The problem is that these samples may be biased because not everyone gets a chance of selection. This random element is its greatest weakness and quota versus probability has been a matter of controversy for many years