Henry II And The 19Th Century

Henry II And The 19th Century
Times started to transform in the 12th and 13th century with how the government ran in England.
Henry II was King at this time and had developed a government system where he had professionals
work for him. These professionals had schooling and got paid salary by the King. The government
was very institutionalized with royal officials administering both revenues and law. The king did not
have to be present much, in place, he had his officials do administrative work and record keeping.
The king traveled all throughout the European continent because he was able to, while his working
officials did his work in place. Henry II extended and strengthened the institutions of the English
government. He became king during a horrible civil war between two royal claimants. "The chaos
had benefited the English barons and high churchmen, who gained new privileges and powers as the
monarchs authority waned" (355). Henry II's father Henry had built new castles and when Henry II
took throne he confiscated the castles and regained the crown land. He then extended monarchical
power by imposing royal justice. He built it on an already well developed legal system. "The Anglo–
Saxon kings had royal district courts: the king appointed sheriffs to police the shires, muster military
levies, and haul criminals into court...to these established institutions, Henry II add a system of
judicial visitations called eyres" (357). With proceeding this system, royal officials went all around
England to judge
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Significance Of The Magna Carta
The Magna Carta was a very influential document that helped to established for the first time the
principle that everybody, including the King, was subject to the law. The rule of law is a concept
fundamental to democratic forms of government and asserts that all, including leaders, must abide
by the laws of the nation. While the Magna Carta does not specifically state that the King is subject
to the rule of law, the document establishes that principle by imposing limits on the King's power. In
1215, the Magna Carta was a peace treaty between King John and the Barons. First drafted by the
Archbishop of Canterbury to make peace between the unpopular King and rebel Barons, it promised
the protection of church rights, protection for the Barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift
justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown, which was set to be implemented through
a council of 25 Barons. Neither side stood behind their commitments, and the charter was annulled
by Pope Innocent III, leading to the First Barons' War. In retrospect it was a failure, but it provided a
new framework for the relationship between the King and his subjects. After King John's death, his
son Henry III, reissued the document in 1216, stripping some of its more radical content, in an
unsuccessful bid to build political support for the new government. At the end of the war in 1217, it
formed part of the peace treaty agreed at Lambeth, where the document acquired the name Magna

Magna Carta Research Paper Outline
Magna Carta
The Magna Carta or "The Great Charter"is one of the most influential documents in history till
date.The Magna Carta inspired many historical documents such as the U.S Constitution and the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The Magna Carta is a peace treaty signed in June 15,1215 between King John and the rebel barons.
The Magna Carta was made because nobles/barons caught King John breaking laws he established.
He was banned from churches by Pope Innocent III. To redeem his reputation, John took money
from barons to help the army, which was against the law. Rebel barons wanted King John to pay for
what he done. So, in May 17,1215, they captured the Tower of London. They made a peace treaty,
Magna Carta, which King John ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Magna Carta also charted the right to a fair trial and limits on taxation without
representation.This peace treaty was created because the king was going against the own laws set by
him, and the rebel barons wanted to put an end to this problem by creating a peace treaty. The
Magna Carta required that no–one including the king himself must not violate the laws.
The Magna Carta is known as one of the first steps taken in England towards parliamentary
democracy. The Magna Carta is a symbol of freedom from oppression. This peace treaty inspired the
Parliament, in England. It also heavily influenced the American Bill of rights, and the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. It inspired the U.S founding fathers to right the U.S Constitution. The
Magna Carta was made to protect basic human rights. The treaty was also contrived to limit the
king's power. King John had no intention of believing in the agreement leading to the Baron's war.
When the Baron's captured London King John was forced to negotiate with barons and eventually
sign the treaty. The 1215 Magna Carta was not the only version.In 1225 there was a

The Reign Of The King
From the reign of King John beginning in 1199 to the reign of Edward III ending in 1377, the role of
kingship is slowly put in to question. Throughout this time period kings find that they now need to
consult with a council in order rule successfully. This time period begins with an absolute monarchy,
but the authority of the king is gradually limited. These changes slowly grow thought this time
period while the authority of parliament increases. This time period also calls into question how the
king is viewed, whether as a person or as an office. This essay will trace the political authority of the
king and his growing limitations. Additionally, it will discuss the birth of parliament and its increase
in political power not only as a whole, but also in relationship to the power of the king. It is within
the reign of King John, where limitation of the king's power is called into play. These limitations
will set the stage for the eventual formation of parliament and a lessening of the king's influence that
future kings cannot ignore. However, with John, as opposed to these future kings, the changes are
relatively ineffective, but will set incoming limitation to the king's power in motion. These events
are triggered when war breaks out in France as of 1202 when the French King gives John's titles to
Arthur, Duke of Brittany. John achieves a victory at Mirebeau, but as of 1204, he loses much of the
northern empire. In 1214, after the loss at the Battle of Bouvines, John

Magna Carta Research Paper
José Valdez
The Magna Carta
The Magna Carta is one of the most important documents from the Middle Ages. It was a charter of
liberties that, King John of England, agreed to. It would initially put him, future kings, and the rest
of England under a unified rule of law. It can be generally described as a peace treaty. It was written
by King John's barons who were the lowest level of British nobility. All of it was originally written
in Latin, so its name translates to "The Great Charter".
Those involved with The Magna Carta were powerful men of the time. The charter itself was made
because of King John, who was just a terrible king that abused his great power. He lied, was greedy,
and didn't really care about anyone but himself. During those ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
During the Middle Ages, it was very successful in creating rules to live by which the whole kingdom
followed. Things were fair, and the King still had to obey the laws which everyone else did. The
Magna Carta consists of a preamble and 63 short clauses. The document also guaranteed the rights
of the people, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial. The U.S. Constitution & Bill of Rights,
still used now, have some obvious influences from the Magna Carta. For example, the Fifth
Amendment states, "Nor shall any persons be deprived of life, liberty or property without due
process of law". This is basically Clause 39. It created a basis for ruling which were finally fair for
everyone. The kings couldn't abuse their power for their own personal gain, they were subjects to
the rules of justice that everyone else was. Though only 3 of the clauses are still used in present
times, The Magna Carta holds the foundation for English common law as it is known

Why Was The Magna Carta Created
King John ruled England at the beginning of the thirteenth century. Not only did he rule, but he
ruled with full power under the monarchial government. His choices were not fair. They triggered
many problems between foreign countries who were the country's tax payers, causing the people of
England's taxes to rise. Throughout a very long and winded process, the English barons became
unhappier with the decisions King John had been making. This is why the Magna Carta was created.
The Magna Carta is a document that was originally created in the year of 1215. This name is
presented in the Latin Language, meaning The Great Charter. A charter is a written endowment by a
country's legislation by which an institution, or in this case, government, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Even though this was true, they were directly produced to King John to stop his unfair rule. This
document is considered a landmark document because initially it only applied to the country of
England. It issued many important laws that are used today. It made sure that the cruel and unusual
punishments that were not forbidden became illegal. This is simply because of moral rights. Another
major clause in the Great Charter was that one person cannot be held responsible for a crime without
a trial by jury of his/her friends. Also, a major clause of the document is that justice should not be
sold or unnecessarily overdue. Throughout history, the Magna Carta was modified and sort of
"recreated". By the twentieth century, only three major clauses remained in the document. The first
clause granted freedom to the Church of England. These churches are Christian Catholic with strong
beliefs in their religious rights. Furthermore, they guarantee the customs and liberties of the English
city of London. Lastly, they forbid uninformed arrest and the transaction of justice. Unlike most
historical documents, whether declaring freedom from a king or any other form of government, the
Magna Carta has no "official" copy. Each copy had at least three thousand six hundred words
written exclusively. Only four of the original copies are remaining today. Many different versions of
the Magna Carta were established between the years 1225 and 1297. Matter of fact, one original
copy from 1217 recently sold for 21.3 million

Tax Reform Persuasive Speech
It amazes me to sit before parliament and witness the ignorance among my fellow noblemen,
bishops, knights, and burgesses who seem to rightfully believe the best course of action for England
to take, is to increase taxes in order to sustain a military buildup. We are some of the most well
educated individuals of this kingdom, yet many of you are so caught up in your own petulance, that
you fail to realize just how unrealizable this legislation is. England's defenses are well kept, and
have proven time and time again to be able to withstand foreign aggression. Rather than focusing on
tax reform that would only harm the hard working laborers of this nation, we should instead focus
our efforts towards maintaining low tax rates for these individuals while we continue to revive our
economy. There are few in this nation who could healthy support and pay for this tax, especially
after the rise of enclosures in 1517. The only way to do this is to underwrite princely ambition, for
passion is a dangerous trait which more often than not leads us astray from what is truly important.
The current state of England's defense is more than optimal. We have numerous castles which have
withstood the brunt of invasion and protected our great nations. Take Dover for example which
overlooks the English Channel, and the Strait of Dover. God has graced us with ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
We should not be motivated by fear, but by God. For if war were truly to break out, our fortifications
will be rendered useless if we are not in the Lord's favor, no amount of money can save us from his
glorious wrath. And the Lord certainly does not favor those who are motivated by temporal goods.
Peace is far more beneficial than the spoils of war, and the rewards are far greater than simply by
glory and extension of territory. England is safe as long as her prince holds himself in a virtuous
light in the eyes of

Magna Carta Dbq
In year 1215, one of the most significant documents was signed by King John, the Magna Carta. The
Magna Carta was constructed to reduce powers by King John, and to make him regulate the country
by the old English law. King John came to an agreement with a group of people who had been
rebelling against him– the barons, he promised the group he would observe standards of conduct.
The Barons were a group of 25 men that did not agree with King John. They were unhappy with
King Johns greed and cruelty. The group allocated clause 61, ensuring the king complies with the
terms. The document guaranteed: freedom for the English church, protection of the law for all free
men, and freedom from excessive fines and taxation on citizens.
The Magna Carta is the foundation of our constitution, and has become a part of English law. There
are things from the Magna Carta that still apply in our constitution. For example, in chapter 39 of
the document it was stated that "No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed,
or banished, or any ways destroyed, nor will we pass upon him, nor will we send upon him, unless
by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land." This is allowing everyone to be
heard in their own defense. This is relating to the United States fifth amendment of the constitution.
King John was known for punishing his enemies without trial, him signing the Magna Carta took
away his power to do such. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The paper confronts assumptions about the English and UK constitutional framework leading up to
the Magna Carta and other documents that both lead up to, and follow it. Our constitution has roots
in English common law and written law. Common law was in place and used before written laws
were created. The Magna Carta was emplaced to end common law in England. The Manga Carta
was the first written laws that shifted the English political system to something

How Did The Magna Carta Impact The Modern World
The Magna Carta, meaning a "great charter", is one of the most famous documents in the world. It
has inspired people across the centuries from Thomas Jefferson to Mahatma Gandhi. It has also
shaped most the general principles in England and around the world. In this paper, I will be
explaining the story of the Magna Carta and the impact it has on our modern world.
In 1215, King John was the ruler of England. Many people believe King John was one of the worst
kings in history. He is known for imprisoning his former wife, starving his opponents to death, and
allegedly murdering his own nephew. He also imposed heavy taxes on his people in order to pay for
his expensive lifestyle. If one refused to pay, he would take away their property or punish

Most Influential Legal Document: Magna Carta Or The Great...
The document that is known as Magna Carta or The Great Charter as it is known in English is
arguably the most influential legal document ever written and it has great bearing upon the United
states constitution and government even to this very day. The document was created in England
during the year of twelve fifteen. It was made in response to the actions of King John who had
committed actions such as starving political adversaries, murdering his nephew and having placed
high taxes on his barons who were forced to pay at the threat of having their property taken in order
to pay for his expensive foreign wars. These actions of the king had created much animosity toward
the church and the barons who served under the king and put him in danger

Comparison Of King John And The Magna Carta
In this essay I will discussing about King John and the Magna Carta. King John otherwise called
John Lackland ruled England for a long time in the Middle Ages. He was born in 24 December 1166
Beaumont Palace, Oxford to Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine, John was the most youthful of 12
and the most loved child of Henry II. John was a disliked King for number of reasons like
unsuccessful battles, requesting higher taxes, this gave numerous haters. John was compelled to sign
the Magna Carta, as a result of his poor choices he made towards England.
The Magna Carta is a record that goes back to the year 1215. The name is Latin for 'The Great
Charter'. A sanction is a composed record that characterises the privileges of a gathering of
individuals. For this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They included promises to protect the freedom and rights of the Church, to counsel all the more
intimately with the barons (particularly on issues,such as taxes) and to ensure certain opportunities
to every single free man. Therefore the archive additionally expressed that a chamber of 25 barons
would be made to prompt the King. Some of the guarantees, or statements, in the report guaranteed
that the King would not do whatever he felt like but rather would be obliged by laws and appropriate
procedures. For instance, he needed to ensure that on the off chance that somebody was blamed for a
wrongdoing they would be given an appropriate trial and would be judged by their associates
(individuals of a similar status, for this situation fellow Englishmen). The King was not permitted to
seize property or belonging from individuals yet needed to pay for them like every other person.
Comparable types of abuse by the lord were likewise precluded by the record. The Magna Carta was
not simply expected for the gatherings engaged with its creation however for future gatherings too,
especially any future Kings or

Magna Carta Vs Declaration Of Independence
Magna Carta means The Great Charter it was a peace treaty ending revolution against an English
king. A copy of the Magna Carta's first appearance was part of the Lord Mayor's Show which
parade. Magna Carta states how the government should treat its people. Also The Declaration of
Independence states how the government should treat its people. Finally they will compare and
contrast to see if they are similar in how they treat each other's people.
Magna Carta says that the government should treat its people to have different rights. One right that
they would have is the right of a wealthy widow that would have centuries–long relevance. It would
guaranteed them church freedom. This means that the rich widows will have every right and
freedom to be in that church. Another thing he says how the government should treat its people is by
making sure of their safety. Taking care of your safety means you have to follow the rules. Even the
king has to follow these rules for his safety. This is stating that it does not matter how old you are or
how young you are everyone has rules that will keep them safe. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This means that they will have independence, happiness, and treated fairly. Another thing the
Declaration of Independence says the government should treat its people with equal rights. It states
that all men will be created equal which means they will all have the right to vote. It does not matter
your religion or anything because all men will be equal. The final thing the Declaration of
Independence says that the government should treat its people with truth and self–evident. That is
when finally women and men were told that everyone would be equal it does not matter if you a
men or women. Overall you wonder if Magna Carta treats its people more fair then the Declaration
of Independence

How Did The Magna Carta Influence The Government
Over the course of history, few documents have made such an impact on the world and its way of
governing than the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta, drafted by rebellious barons and presented to
King John of England in 1215, was a document that essentially limited the power of the king. This
was a revolutionary concept at the time because the king had always had absolute power and the
citizens and barons had few rights that were protected by the government. Once the Magna Carta
was drafted, the concept of human rights became a popular one and was later instituted in many of
the world's government. The Magna Carta's history and creation was a very important step for not
only England but the world and it influenced many governments in the world, especially ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In reality, the Constitution and the Magna Carta are almost identical when it comes to the inclusion
of certain rights in these respective documents. Originally in the Magna Carta it states that the
"English Church shall be free and shall have her whole rights and her liberties inviolable [safe from
sudden charge]..." (D2). While this is more exclusive to the English church it still respects the
institution and allows people to worship in it. In the first Amendment of the Constitution, the
freedom to practice whatever religion a person wants to is provided and it is also prohibited to limit
or prevent this practice from anybody. Both principles share core themes and were revolutionary in
their respective countries and time periods. Another important right addressed in the Magna Carta as
Provision 29 says that "no free man shall be taken, or imprisoned, or dispossessed, or outlawed, or
banished, or in any way destroyed, except by the legal judgment of his peers or by the law of the
land" (D1). This right was adapted into the Constitution as the 5th Amendment which mentions that
no person will be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law" (D2). This
amendment is a direct descendant of Provision 29 and both stand out as symbols of liberty and
justice when reviewing these

Brendan Schmidt Period 9
Mr. Colesanti Research project
Why is the Magna Carta a significant document in world history? For centuries England was ruled
as a monarchy. England was ruled by an over powered and abusive King. Before the Magna Carta
the King of England King John had abused his power. He did this by overtaxing the people of
England, losing land in war, giving and much more. The people decided that the king had too much
power so the Magna Carta was formed. The Magna Carta was signed on June 15, 1215 between
King John and the people of England during the middle ages in Runnymede. King John was forced
to sign this document and agree to the demands of his barons Magna Carta is Latin for Great Charter
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was the most formal way of giving power back to the people. The 40 barons that wrote the Magna
Carta had 63 different requests written in it. The first thing the barons asked for was freedom of the
church and electing church officials such as the pope. King John was disliked for punishing his
enemies without trial. The signing of the Magna Carta took away his power to do so. One of the
things asked by the barons was that "no free man shall be arrested or imprisoned or deceased or
outlawed or exiled or in any way victimized neither will we attack him or send anyone to attack him
except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land." This means that no one person
will be unlawfully victimized. The purpose of this law was to prevent King John from personally
ordering the arrest and punishment of a free man without lawful judgment according to the Magna
Carta. Another request from the Magna Carta was, "We will sell to no man, we will not deny to any
man, either justice or right." This means a fair justice system will be granted to every man no matter
their place in society or religious beliefs. The intentions of the Magna Carta were not to be a list of
rights for England. The Magna Carta was more like a contract that said that the king would obey
these requests. The result of King John signing the Magna Carta was he lost a significant amount of
his power while the people gained more

Magna Carta Argumentative Essay
In a few months, we will be commemorating the 800th anniversary of the sealing of Magna Carta–
commemorating, but not celebrating; rather, mourning the blows it has suffered. The first
authoritative scholarly edition of Magna Carta was published by the eminent jurist William
Blackstone in 1759. It was no easy task. As he wrote, "the body of the charter has been
unfortunately gnawn by rats"–a comment that carries grim symbolism today, as we take up the task
the rats left unfinished. Blackstone's edition actually includes two charters: the Great Charter and the
Charter of the Forest. The former is generally regarded as the foundation of Anglo–American law–in
Winston Churchill's words, referring to its reaffirmation by Parliament in 1628, "the ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is no slight irony in the fact that their major allies throughout the world are the surviving
indigenous communities that have upheld their own versions of the Charter of the Forest. In Canada,
the Gitxaala First Nation is filing a lawsuit opposing a tar–sands pipeline passing through its
territory, relying on recent high–court rulings on indigenous rights. In Ecuador, the large indigenous
community played an essential part in the government's offer to keep some of its oil in the ground,
where it should be, if the rich countries would compensate Ecuador for a fraction of the lost profits.
(The offer was refused.) The one country governed by an indigenous majority, Bolivia, held a World
People's Conference in 2010, with 35,000 participants from 140 countries. It produced a People's
Agreement calling for sharp reductions in emissions, as well as a Universal Declaration on the
Rights of Mother Earth. These are key demands of indigenous communities all over the

William Marshall Essay
William Marshall is considered by many to be the epitome of knighthood and chivalry as well as
being an outstanding ambassador for England during the turbulent twelfth and thirteenth centuries.
From a virtually obscure beginning, William evolves into one of the most dominant stately figures
of the time in England. During his brilliant military and political career, William served as knight for
the courts of Kings Henry II, Richard (the Lion–hearted), and John. William was born around 1147
to John Marshall and Sybil of Salisbury during the reign of King Stephen. His father, John Marshall,
served as a court officer and eventually earned the status of a minor baron. John Marshall was a
shrewd soldier and a skilled negotiator. He was the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He remained in Jerusalem for two years. Upon his return to England, Marshall is welcomed into the
King's military household. War, counsel and command were now his daily life. William is a
common figure in the court and currently does not have a prominent status. Marshall faithfully
serves King Henry II during the last years of his reign. The King has two heirs to the throne in
Richard and John. This presents a problem of sorts for Henry. Richard, the most capable and
competent, appears destined to descend the throne. Henry would prefer John in succeeding him as
king, however he realizes that Richard is by far the most qualified and prolific of the two. Toward
the end of Henry's rule, Richard rebels against his father, joining Phillip II of France. The two begin
a series of battles against the King. During this time period, William remains faithful to Henry.
Marshall inevitably realizes that his current enemy may well become his future king. This conflict
does not influence William's fidelity for his King. His loyalty to Henry remains in tact and is not
compromised despite the fact that treason might have seemed advantageous to him at the time.
These wars coupled with his bitter relationship with Richard take a heavy toll on the King. In 1189,
Henry's health gradually deteriorates until he eventually dies.&#9; Despite their past
differences, Richard returns home to England for his father's funeral and to assume his

Magna Carta Failure
The Magna Carta was a peace treaty signed to keep war from breaking out. Even though the treaty
was a failure and did not solve any of the issues in England, the document had a major impact on
several important documents. England wasn't the only country affected by this treaty, but it also
shaped the U.S government and our Constitution.
The Magna Carta was the result of a dictatorial king using power to attain whatever was needed to
keep his political power. England owned land in France, and the barons supported the king by giving
money and men to keep and guard the territory from being taken over. The relationship and between
the barons and the king was supposed to be very close since many decisions required the barons
approval. In 1204, the king lost his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Eventually Pope Innocent III excommunicated King John and he was faced with a life doomed to
hell. Being excommunicated was a major deal for people during this era, and in 1214 the king gave
the church more power and certain freedoms in order to get his salvation back. It was also during
this time that King John went to war against France trying to regain his territory, but was was
defeated. The battle is known as the Battle of Bouvines. The Barons rebelled against the king and
took over London but were not able to completely defeat the king. It was then that both sides were
willing to talk and came up with the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta, also known as 'the great
charter' was a treaty that the king was forced to accept so he could keep his political position. It
received the Great Seal on June 15, 1215 at Runnymede by the river Thames. The Barons were the
one's who wrote it and presented it as the Articles of the Barons. They wanted to protect their
freedom against a dictatorial king. The Magna Carta was also a solution to keeping a civil war from
breaking out. The document required that the king would govern according to the feudal law

Magna Carta Dbq
The Document that helped form a New Nation
The Magna Carta is likely one of the best–known documents still surviving from medieval England,
but not everyone knows the history behind it. Signed on June 15, 1215 when King John affixed his
royal seal, the Magna Carta, essentially formed as a peace treaty with the barons was put into the
course of England's laws. Also referred to as the "Great Charter", the Magna Carta guaranteed to the
barons that the king would respect federal rights, uphold the freedom of the church and maintain the
nation's laws. The Charter established for the first time that everyone, including the king and his
family were to follow the law. Ten weeks after the Magna Carta was signed, Pope Innocent III
annulled the agreement, the King and the barons plunged into war again. Being a major part of
England's medieval history, the Magna Carta also played a contributing role in America's history,
greatly influencing the Bill of Rights and helping to create a structure for the Declaration of
Independence. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"After King John died the Magna Carta took a crucial step towards constitutional government" (
Levy ). The Magna Carta took a step toward constitutional government because Henry III, King
John's successor, reissued the Magna Carta in 1216. He failed so he tried again the next year and had
the same outcome. Henry didn't succeed until the year 1225. Up until the recreation of the Magna
Carta monarchs ruled supreme in England. The Charter itself consisted of a preamble and sixty–
three clauses. In 1297 Edward I entered the Magna Carta into the Statutes of Realm. By the late
fifteenth century collections of statues of the Magna Carta were some of the earliest books to be
printed in

The Magna And Rousseau Theory Of The Social Contract
Magna Carta vs Rousseau
The Magna Carta and Rousseau theory of the social contract are both different and similar in many
ways. The Magna Carta protects a certain group of people. And the Rousseau theory of the social
contract is to protect everyone. But they also have a lot of similarities such as the fact that they both
put restrains on the government.
Magna Carta
The Magna Carta is a series of documents that represent an important step in the progression of
governance in western civilization. The foundation of the Magna Carta was that everybody
including the king was subjected to the law. This document defined and limited the federal rights of
the monarch. In spite of what the Magna Carta outlooks today, this document was not written with
proud ideas of justice and liberty in mind. It was initially meant as a peace treaty between king john
and his barons, with whom he was at war with. The barons had seized London and john found
himself in a political jumble, he need a swift way out solution. The document only covers the
nobility, connected, the land owners. So blacks, kids, women, and the poor was not covered by the
Magna Carta. The Magna Carta never accomplish its goal of producing peace. In datum it failed
dramatically. Granting john agreed to the Magna Carta at first, he swiftly became acrimonious when
his terms were enforced upon him. He transcribed a letter to the pope to get it null and void. The
pope essentially happened to come to an agreement with john, by

King John And The Barons
During and after the time of the Norman kings, English monarchs would a call for a Great Council.
It is the Great Council that will evolve into Parliament. It was an assembly of church leaders, such
as archbishops, bishops, abbots. As well as powerful members of the landowning nobility like
barons and earls to address the important affairs of the realm.became hopeless for it to rule
effectively. The conflict between King John and the barons is a major instance of what happens
when the system of consultation and consent was ignored. The results of which would start the
lowering the authority of the king and the rise of Parliament. The idea of popular consent to royal
government emerged in the thirteenth century during the reign of King John from 1199 to 1216. He
was the youngest of the five sons of King Henry II of England and Eleanor of Aquitaine. Being the
youngest boy, he was not expected to inherit a large amount of land. After his older brothers' failed
rebellion between 1173 and 1174, John became the favored child of his father. He was given the title
"Lord of Ireland" in 1177 and received lands in both England and English lands on the European
continent. When most of his elder brothers died young, John's brother Richard, became king 1189
after the death of their father. John was a potential heir to the throne. While his brother was off
fighting in the Holy Land with the Third Crusade, John attempted a rebellion against Richard 's
administrators which failed. When

Magna Carta Essay
The Magna Carta, Latin for "Great Paper", was written as a charter for England in 1215 (Magna 1).
The Magna Carta has had the most significant influence on modern day common law and
constitutions. The document was originally written because of disagreements between the Pope,
King John, and his English barons over the rights of the king. The Magna Carta required the king to
renounce certain rights, and to accept that the powers of the king could be bound by law (Asimov
12). There are a few misconceptions about the Magna Carta, however. It was not the first document
to attempt to limit the power of the king. It, however, failed to limit the power of the king, especially
during the Middle Ages. The Magna Carta had been strengthened ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
During the Tudor period, there was limited knowledge of the document, even by those who wrote
about it. In the statute books, it appeared that the Magna Carta was brought about by King Henry III,
rather than the reapplication of the original charter. The Magna Carta was first used during the Tudor
period as a Bill of Rights. The church often attempted to use the first clause of the Magna Carter to
protect itself from attacks by King Henry, but its claims had no credibility (Asimov 55). The first
person to attempt to use the Magna Carta was Francis Bacon, who asserted that it guaranteed due
process in a trial. At this time in English history, the Magna Carta was used in common law.
However, it was not seen as a set of liberties guaranteed for the people against the Crown and
government in general, but as a normal statute which gave a certain level of liberties that could not
be relied on, especially against the king. Therefore, the Magna Carta had very little effect on
government in the early Tudor period because of the power the king retained, a situation which
lasted until the Elizabethan age. During the Elizabethan age, England was becoming the most
powerful force in Europe. Pride was becoming a primary force in all areas of academics and
attempts were made to prove that Parliament had Roman origins. The Magna Carta was interpreted
as an

Magna Carta In Early America
The magna Carta had a huge effect on the beginning of the United states, it is referred to as one of
the most important legal documents in history. It was an outline for the early Americans to live by. It
was the first time a king didn't have complete power and had rules that everyone had to follow. It
was an effort to check in on the king's powers, known as 'due process' of law, and to 'strike a
balance' between people's rights and common good. The Magna Carta prevents any ruler being
aggressive towards citizens and gives everyone protection of the law. This document was signed in
1215 in Runnymede, England. Although the magna Carta originated in England, it was used in early
America, and helped them develop as a nation. The Magna Carta plays a big role in the development
of the United states because it made fairness in the law, provided economic rights, and it struck a
balance between rights and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Fifth amendment says that, 'no one should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due
process of law. The 14th amendment also guarantees due process of the law. Due process is
necessary to run a just society, it prevents the government for impacting citizens in an abusive way,
a nation is not truly free without the protection of the law. Due process ensures that the government
are forced to act in a legal way before anyone is 'stripped of life, liberty, or property'. No legal action
can be taken without a fair trial, if this was not a rule, there would be thousands of innocent people
locked up, meaning that the US would not be truly free. Due process prevents irrational things such
as lynching suspected criminals. Even the poorest, and most unorganized must be treated with
respect by the government, people are not longer treated like objects, but valuable

What Was The Impact Of The Magna Carta
As a result of civil unrest, the Magna Carta of 1215 not only documented the liberties held by "free
men" but it was also the first document to enforce law upon the sovereign. Written in Latin and not
in the best condition, the Magna Carta (or Great Charter) has succeeded to remain relevant to the
cause of human rights today, eight centuries after it was scrawled onto sheep skin and affirmed with
the sticky wax seal of the King John. Throughout this essay I will analysing the document and
exploring the effects it had on society.
The Magna Carta was a turning point in history, with the initiation of human rights, one of
legislations that was most significant was clause 39, 'No free man shall be arrested or imprisoned ...
except by lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.' This deemed that imprisonment
should not occur without a legal process, this reshaped the legal process and provoked the notion of
trial by jury. Which effectively established the principle of the rule of law and protecting individuals
from arbitrary punishment. In theory, this would of course have created a justice system, however
the term 'free man' has its limitations as it only referred to the minority of the population of England
at the time. Many of the people were unfree peasants known as 'villeins', who could only pursue
justice through the courts of their own lords. This implies that that King John hoped the Charter
would become no more than a toothless symbol of his generosity to the

Personal Narrative Essay On Beowulf
I am Kade of Lindsey and, though I am a peaceful man not often prone to violence, I must go to war
today. Under nearly any other circumstances I would stay home and away from the abomination of
Anglo–Saxon battle. The rage of war doesn't very well suit me, however I will gladly fight against
the creatons of Mercia I am not entirely sure why this feud has broken out nor do I care, honestly. I
am going to war with Mercia solely because the true love of my life has left me for a Mercian. For
quite some time, I was too heartbroken and depressed to attempt to do anything about this and now
it is seemingly too late. It seems that she has now completely moved on from me and taken my heart
and its contents with her. Despite this, I am now ready to fight just for the chance to spill his blood. I
can easily defeat him on the field of battle as I am much larger and a great deal stronger than he.
That is what infuriates me most, I believe. For all my might, intelligence, and prowess, I still cannot
win back her heart from this poor scrawny man. I normally carry ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I can hear my heart beating through the thick blanket of heaving breaths. I cannot help but wonder if
I will hear that sound much longer. For the first time I consider the thought that I could easily be
killed before I even find the one I'm here for. The Mercians have come to face us. We prepare to
charge when the order comes. I say a swift prayer for protection and victory. The call comes, though
I barely hear it through the piercing sound of my own ears ringing. It takes my mind a moment to
process that it is time to charge so I am behind at the jump. As I sprint off into battle, I get boxed in
by warriors slower than myself. People are being impaled around me as I weave through stampeding
bodies, searching for my target. Cries of agony and thrill are unceasingly filling the air accompanied
by the sounds of metal striking metal and spears forcing their way through weaker

The Barons: King John And The Paupers
King John Essay
Introduction
In my essay that is focused on King John I will assess and aspect the following areas: John and the
Barons; King John and the Church; King John and France; King John and the Paupers. The topic
with the most importance here is his association with the Barons, mainly because it had a huge
influence on today's world. I will go into this subject in much more detail later. My main line of
argument is that the British Empire was struggling but able to cope before John's reign; however it
became weaker and lost a lot of control due to his mistakes and that he was a failure.
King John and the Barons
The most significant thing that John did was to anger the Barons and thereby indirectly creating
Magna Carta. When John ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
First of all, to argue with the Church during his reign was a foolish thing to do. No science existed
so religion was centred around everyone's lives; the Church was also wealthy which gave them a lot
of power. King John refused to allow the Pope's choice of Stephen Langton to become the new
Archbishop of Canterbury in 1205. John decided to choose the new Archbishop himself, to show
that he was more powerful than the Church, this showed arrogance and that he was stubborn. This
led to an interdict being passed over the United Kingdom as a punishment in 1208. This banned all
religious activity in England and Wales. This angered the religious English and Welsh monks and
religious people, at John. John still would not give in and sold all of the Church's property to fund
his wars. To add to this, he punished many innocent monks to show that he was in control. In 1209,
Pope Innocent III had had enough and excommunicated John, which meant he was destined for hell.
Eventually, John gave in. They made peace and became allies. However, the pain and suffering
caused by John trying to prove he was more powerful than the Pope was unnecessary if he had not
just obeyed the

The Magna Carta Charter
na Carta Charter The Magna Carta charter has been credited as one of England's earliest attempts at
a semi–democratic community following the dissipation of the Athenian democracy and the Roman
Republic, among others. The charter was drafted at Runnymede on 15 June 1215 in an attempt to
address long overdue socio–economic and political problems that had plagued the region over a
500–year period. Despite the long–standing history associated with the charter's spirit, some of the
key reasons for its drafting include King John's exploitation and destruction of the baron families
through over–taxation efforts or scutage that were designed to fund and refund military campaigns
in both France and Normandy against King Philip II . His failures and eventual return to England in
1214 sparked a rebellion that would eventually facilitate the charter's ratification. There can be no
doubt as to the wealth of this history and its association with a free, democratic society. This,
however, does not legitimize the notion of England being the originator of modern democracy. In
fact, the charter was more about the devolution of power within the nobility than the citizenship. In
this regard, while it provided numerous provisions that would eventually protect the public, its main
agenda was to limit the chances of absolutism and improve the autonomy, rights, powers, and
freedoms of barons. Its longevity is another matter of concern as the charter would soon be revised
in the course of King

Art Analysis Of Donatello By One Of The Patron Saint Mark
ART ANALYSIS: SAINT MARK The Italian artist Donatello was selected by one of the guilds in
Florence to make a sculpture of their patron Saint Mark, and Donatello delivered. In the early
fourteenth century, half of Florence's market hall was torn down to make room for Orsanmichele, a
meeting place for all the guilds of Florence. In 1339, each guild was given its own spot to
personalize and decorate. Though it took much more time than originally planned, in 1411,
Donatello was chosen by the linen drapers guild to sculpt Saint Mark as their display. Donatello
chose to work with the less expensive marble instead of bronze. His contract stated that the
sculpture should be finished by November of 1412, but this had to be extended, of course. Finally
the statue was finished in 1413, and truthfully the back of the statue was not fully completed
because the back was not going to be displayed. When Donatello finished this magnificent piece of
art, the guild was actually quite critical of the figure that stands seven feet nine inches tall. The
figure was also profound because it used the contrapposto stance, in which the figure is
asymmetrical. This stance had been forgotten by artists all throughout most of the Dark Ages, so to
see it back in such a wondrous display was very important. Donatello also considered the angle at
which the statue of Saint Mark would be seen, from down below. Donatello purposefully made Saint
Mark's head and hands and torso elongated; this would be

Compare And Contrast The Kings And Queens In Medieval England
Kings and queens in Medieval England Which kings or queens in Medieval England do you know
the most? Since Norman Dynasty to Windsor Dynasty, there were forty–two different kings and
queens ruled the Medieval England (Medieval). Every queen and kings have many different kinds of
life, their experience were not the same as the other kings and queens, so I chose three kings and
queens in Medieval England.The life of William 1, Edward 1, and Elizabeth 1. Their life and
childhood were very different from each other. William 1 had a poor childhood, but a successful
king's life.When he was a child, he was being known as "William the Bastard" for his enemy
because his parents never get married. When he grows up, he was always very successful and he had
a professional and skillful army. The most important business was happening in Norman Dynasty is
when William the first ruled the England was the Battle of Hastings. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Edward 1 became one of the greatest Plantagenet kings.But he was an inpatient and violent king. In
1265 at the battle of Evesham in , he showed his main military prowess in fighting with Simon,
when he won the fight, he didn't stop and rest, he was still wanted to give him a hard time and
torment Simon de Montfort and his family who was his cousin.Edward 1, was a good warrior and
leader, he respected other, he asked his knights and townsman about his decision.In 1298 (Edward).
Edward 1 is a kind king in England, he won't make his decision without others permission, even
though he was a king, that is why Edward is the first was one of the greatest Plantagenet

The Magna Carta was a charter in 1215 that gave rights to protect its subjects from King John and
his oppressive rulings. It contained sixty–three clauses that detailed everything from land rights to
legal rights. This document gave protection to the people from the tyrant King and placed no man
above the law, not even the king. Unfortunately, the document failed with civil war ensuing months
later.
King John was excommunicated from the church in 1209 for seizing church property and selling it
back to the church at a profit. He then used these funds to build an English Navy to invade Ireland in
1210. He then furthered his exhibition to invade Poitou, France and after a humiliating defeat to
France, King John headed back to England to rebuild his reserves and his ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In May of 1215 the rebels declared war against their King in an attempt to revolt against the
oppressing regime stemming from Henry II. After the failed attempt to infiltrate Northampton castle,
the people of London opened their gate to let them in. Thus, leading to the signing of the Magna
Carta.
The Magna Carta is typical of the era because, people were tired of being oppressed by a tyrant.
This is evident in a writing by Matthew Paris, "Foul as it is, hell itself is made fouler by the presence
of King John." The writing is also specific to its time, the document was written in Old English. The
subject of the document was a series of clauses to ensure that not even the king was above the law.
This work was considerably unusual for its time, because the king had always been the Judge and
the Jury. The people were his subjects and the people were subjected to his rulings. A king could
levy taxes at any rate from his subjects to support his war efforts. But, as stated in the Magna Carta
under the 12th clause it states "No 'scutage' (money levied for war) or 'aid' may be levied in our
kingdom without its general

Magna Carta
Eli Courtney
Grade 7
'To no one will we sell, or delay, right or justice'
Tthese were the founding words of the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta (meaning Great Charter in
Latin) is a document made in June, 15, 1215 AD which stated that the King/Queen of England was
not above the law. Before Magna Carta the current ruler, King John ruled England without having
any laws opposing what he could do. Magna Carta stated that everyone no matter their nobility,
wealth or power was subjected to the law. Magna Carta also gave 25 of England's most powerful
Archbishops, Lords and Barons the right to declare war on the current reigning monarch if he didn't
obey the Magna Carta.
Before the Magna Carta, King John had absolute reign over England and England's Armies, Land
and Citizens. One example of King John's tyrannical ruling was when King John forced a powerful
baron by the name of Robert Fitzwalter to marry King John's ex wife Isabella of Gloucester. He also
forced Robert to pay 20,000 marks to the royal treasury for permission to marry. Another example of
King John's tyrannical rule was that he elected England's courts of law. Since he elected who was
the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They decided that the King had no right to force the people of England to do things against their will
and that everyone could trade resources to and from England with no additional tax. They agreed
they would all renounce their allegiance to the King until he met their demands and signed an
agreement. A few weeks later the Barons and Archbishops seized control over London from King
John and renounced their loyalty to King John until he signed the Magna Carta. They declared a
major baron called Robert Fitzwalter their leader. After a week of this dire situation King John had
no choice but to negotiate with

Architecture Of Westminster Abbey
Westminster Abbey
Westminster Abbey is an architectural masterpiece from the 13th and 16th century. There have been
many coronations taken place there since 1066. There are many tombs of great kings and famous
people located there. There have also been sixteen royal weddings that have taken place at the
Abbey. The Abbey is not a cathedral or a parish church. There have been countless profound
occasions that have happened at the Abbey. Westminster Abbey has much history packed into one
building and has had a large impact on English history.
At that time the Abbey had the newest style of Gothic style including ribbed vaulting, rose windows,
flying buttresses and pointed arches. The design of the Abbey was greatly influenced by French
architecture (The Editors of the Encyclopedia, 2017). The architecture of the building has greatly
influenced English history in the fact that it was one of the tallest churches in England, along with
that it had narrower–single aisles, that way it could look taller (Westminster Abbey–– Faith at the
Heart of a Nation). King Henry III wanted to create the Abbey for a new Saint, and also for his own
burial. There were three freemasons that supervised the designing of the Abbey. Henry of Reyns was
a major architect at that time. It is unknown if he was English or French. He was greatly influenced
by new cathedrals at Reims, Amiens and Chartres (Westminster Abbey–– Faith at the Heart of a
Nation). There were also two other contributors named John of Gloucester and Robert of Beverly.
King Henry III wanted to have it built for Edward the Confessor. Henry III was close to Edward and
knew that he was a good person and wanted it built for him. Henry also wanted it built for his own
burial so he would have a perfect resting place where he could be honored. They were both indeed
buried there along with several other important people to English history. Even though the body of
Edward the Confessor was moved there later, the initial intent of Henry III still happened his death.
There is also many pieces of artwork in Westminster Abbey that show various important occasions
in English history. One of the oldest pieces of artwork in the Abbey is the retable, it was most likely
used for

King Louis Ix And Richard Lionheart
The Medieval period was perhaps one of the most interesting and unique time periods in history.
This time is usually viewed as a lull in progress or lacking productivity, when in reality this was one
of the most pivotal points in history. Two people who played outstanding roles in this time period
were those of King Saint Louis IX of France and Richard Lionheart I of England. Both King Louis
IX and Richard Lionheart made significant social, political, and cultural advancements to society by
contributing leadership techniques and government systems that were pivotal in the Medieval times,
yet very contrasting of each other in their execution.
King Louis IX of France was born April 25, 1214 in Poissy, France to the parents of Louis VIII of
France and Blanche of Castille. King Louis, commonly known as Saint Louis, ruled from the age of
twelve after his father's death in 1226 until his death in 1270. He was the fourth born child, but the
three before him died at young ages, and seven were born after him. As a child, Louis had temper
fits which lead to questioning of his decision making as king of France. He married Margaret of
Provence at age twenty in 1234. Margaret was the sister–in–law to King Henry III of England,
sisters with Eleanor of Provence.
Richard "The Lionheart" I of England was born September 8, 1157 in Beaumont Palace, Oxford,
England to the parents of Henry II, and Eleanor of Aquitaine. He was given the nickname
"Lionheart" because of his immense strength and

Magna Carta Sealing
C. Sealing of the Magna Carta
In May 1215, a group of leading nobles renounced their homage to King John, and this large–scale
defection to the rebel cause following the capitulation of London aroused a sentiment of negotiation
in the king, who agreed to meet the rebels at Runnymede to negotiate peace. Until this point, many
of the rebels just wanted John I to be dethroned outright, but King John handing out the
metaphorical olive branch allowed more moderate thought to gain momentum. Some began to hope
that the king was being genuine in his repentance and thusly, a group of moderates anxious to end
the rebellion, argued for compromise and their terms of settlements were the Magna Carta. It is
likely that the terms were hurriedly assembled ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On August 24th, Pope Innocent III declared the charter a "shameful and demeaning agreement
forced upon a king by violence and fear" and "under the threat of excommunication that the king not
dare to observe it nor the barons required it to be observed. The charter, we hereby declare to be a
nullity, void of all validity forever". After this, the Magna Carta lost the support of the English
clergymen, who had originally been on the side of the rebels. In late 1215, the charter disappeared,
and civil war broke out. Louis of France was proclaimed king by the barons and they aided him in
his invasion of England. John I died on the 12th of November ending the ongoing civil war, and his
nine–year–old King Henry III (1207–1272) son was proclaimed

The Magna Cart The Great Charter
The Magna Carta is one of the most popular documents of all time. Magna Carta means "The Great
Charter." It is a document given by King John of England as an answer to the problems he had in
1215. The document state that everyone, even the upper class had to follow the law. About ten years
after it was changed but it still remains a part of the British constitution. It contains 63 clauses in the
document. Inside the document were hidden life lessons and teachings. Many other national
documents used the Magna Carta as a basis like the US Bill of Rights.
It matters because many US documents used it as a basis like the Bill of Rights. It was used as a
peace treaty for the King and his subjects originally that did not work but it set up the new

The Magna Carta
Nathanael Sterner
Mr. Whitaker
HIST 102
November 22, 2017
The Signing of the Magna Carta Those in our country that teach about the United States government
will at one point bring up the signing of the Magna Carta as a pivotal point in the establishing the
principle of the government is accountable to the laws of the common man. Before this point the
king sat on high and dictated how people were to live there lives alongside the church while not
being held accountable to the laws that he made. This lead to great resentment when a king was seen
as tyrannical. So the Magna Carta or 'the Great Charter' was created to help curb the King John II of
England when he wanted to continue the war with France, set boundaries on what the king could do
without the consent of the 'council', and bind the ruler of the land to his subjects in such a way that
he had to obey his own rules. In the time leading up to the signing of the 'Great Charter' King John
had lost his holdings in France after several unsuccessful military endeavors. To help reclaim these
holdings King John demanded that his barons provide him with more men and money to take the
land back. However he did this without forewarning his barons about the increasing demand that he
was placing on taxes and levies. The barons then thought that they were being wronged by the
feudal system and that the king was not upholding his end of the deal. In addition to this when King
John could not get his money he cracked down on

Why Was The Magna Carta A Demand For Freedom?
The Magna Carta was a demand for freedom by the nobles. It was vital to the nobleman of England
because it was how they eliminated the absolute power of King John. Before King John was in
power, his brother King Richard, was in power. King Richard had practically left no money for King
John when he became the king because he had used it to fund many expensive wars in the Crusades.
King John had to make money quickly, so he got his money by taxing the nobles. The nobles hated
this, especially because England kept losing wars, so they essentially were funding wars that
England didn't even win. It also didn't help that King John wasn't very popular with the nobles, this
was because he lost Normandy to France, which made John look weak. He also kept collecting
money from them to fund more wars, that they kept losing. Also, because John tried to take back
Normandy and was brutally defeated at the Battle of Bouvines in 1214. The nobles were also tired
of King John taking their sons and using them for the military. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It was a demand for freedom. The Magna Carta included 63 rules. To summarize, it included that
you can't be imprisoned without a fair trial, mercenaries have to leave the country, and if you lost
your land unlawfully you get it back, and same with fines. There is some controversy over whether
the Magna Carta was a demand for freedom or just a greedy wish list. Nowadays, only 3 out of the
63 rules of the Magna Carta are still in force.These are respect the rights and freedoms of the city of
London, don't lock up people without a fair trial, and to keep the English Church free. But either the
Magna Carta was very important in the English

What Is Magna Carta Essay
Ranya Al Naser
Mrs. Harris
History–9L
Oct. 30th, 2015 Magna Carta
"Magna Carta (the great charter) is not primarily significant for what is was, but rather for what it
was made to be" Erwin Griswold, Dean of the Harvard Law School stated. The Magna Carta is the
most important document in the English–speaking world. It was made because, in the 1200's in
England, there was a king called king john who was greedy and bad to his people. The barons
(lords) had enough of king john's acts and wrote the Magna Carta. They made the king agree and to
it and sign the document(he had no choice.) He didn't meet any on the noble expectations of a king,
and he took people's money for war, he sent people to jail for the pointless reasons and he killed his
relatives. I will be writing about the basic concepts and historical background of the Magna Carta in
this essay.
So the Magna Carta is fundamentally about the freedom and liberty of the people. It was made ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
My opinion on the Magna Carta is it's a great thing that happened in history, it also changed the type
of government in England which is a quiet revolutionary thing. This document is still relevant today
because the world still struggles with equality, freedom of speech, human rights and horrible rulers
of countries/people in politics.The human race is probably getting worst by the year's, even with all
these historical revolutions and upsides, because humans are greedy cruel beings that no matter how
many wars or death they won't learn from their mistake. Can't you see the many time where history
repeats itself and all the wars that are happening now because of ignorance and greed. all am really
saying it be more peaceful and mindful of your life and what you do in this planet we call home.

The War between Scotland and England in the Reign of...
Why did War break out between Scotland and England in the Reign of Edward I?
On the 14th of May 1264, the forces of Simon de Montfort, Gloucester and the Londoners were set
arrayed against the loyalist forces of King Henry III, Richard of Cornwall and Prince Edward (later
to become King Edward I). The loyalists suffered a massive defeat at this Battle of Lewes and
among those captured, aside from Richard of Cornwall and perhaps the King (Prestwich indicates
the unsure nature of the King's capture 46), were the northern barons (Scottish lords) of Balliol,
Bruce and Comyn. (Jenks 132) Prince Edward also became a hostage as part of an exchange after
the battle. These same men who fought together and were held captive by the de Montforts ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One of these four advisors was John Balliol, father of the future King of Scotland. (Prestwich 26) It
is quite clear that, "[families] notable in Scottish history were also notable in England... The
Bruces... were a Yorkshire family, and the Robert Bruce who was Balliol's rival for the Scottish
crown in 1292 had served Henry III for twenty years and ended... as chief justice of the English
court of king's bench." (Miller 4) Given that such relationships so closely tied the English and the
Scottish leaderships war was far from anyone's agenda. However, during this time it was not
uncommon even for close relationships to digress towards war. Family lines were built with
strategic marriages to link families together, but they could just as easily lead to arguments and even
war, specifically resulting from such strategic partnerships (or lack there of).
Alexander II King of Scotland had been married to Joan, younger sister to Henry III, but later
married Mary of Coucy (daughter of a great French house) after Joan's death. This new marriage
offended Henry III, not least of all because he was trying to recover French land (Poitou) and gain
respect in continental Europe. (Powicke 586–7) To prevent war a new treaty was made giving the
King of Scots more power, but at the same time asking him not to enter into any alliances hostile to
England. This treaty was cemented by the marriage of Alexander (son of Mary and King Alexander
II, who died before the

The Pros And Cons Of The Magna Carta
One might have hoped that the 800th anniversary of the sealing of Magna Carta would have
provided at least some oxygen to the argument that 'Bad King John' was perhaps not too 'Bad' after
all; and – whisper it – that in some ways this traditionally most maligned of monarchs was perhaps
really rather Good.
Instead, the anticipated tsunami of popular and learned articles collectively assert, inter alia, that
John was at once cruel and coercive, treacherous and tyrannical, pusillanimous and pitiful, lazy and
lackluster. For the large part it seems that, 800 years later, opinion has broadly backed Matthew
Paris, the 13th–century chronicler who alleged that John's greatest achievement was, by dying, to
make yet more foul the existing foulness of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Magna Carta of 1215 (it is important to realise that there were many reissues of Magna Carta
after the reign of John, each different to the one presented to John) is better understood as a set of
flawed peace terms designed to heal the incipient civil war between John and an element of
rebellious barons.
In order to try and bind John to their terms, the barons insisted that John accept a committee of 25 of
their number empowered to police and enforce Magna Carta by seizing John's castles and assets
when he was judged – by them, and against criteria put forth by them – to have transgressed.
No medieval monarch could have accepted for any length of time the Magna Carta of 1215, for it
clearly rendered the king a phantom of a monarch. Indeed, so extreme was this impact that it is not
beyond sensible contemplation that the ambition of the rebel barons was not to obtain a lasting
peace, but instead absolutely to provoke John to break the newly agreed terms so that they could
seize his largesse. John did indeed overturn Magna Carta, but arguably any medieval monarch
would have done the same. The Magna Carta of 1215 is not the Magna Carta of popular

Henry II And The 19Th Century

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Marisela Stone

More from Marisela Stone (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Henry II And The 19Th Century