Example risk check list based on a risk breakdown structure

M
Example risk check list (based on a Risk Breakdown Structure)
RBS LEVEL 0 RBS LEVEL 1 RBS LEVEL 2 EXAMPLE RISKS
Could this risk
affect our project?
Yes
No
Don’t know
Not applicable
1.1 Scope definition Scope changes may arise during project.
Redundant scope may be discovered.
1.2 Requirements
definition
Client may introduce significant change during project (positive or negative).
Internal inconsistencies may exist within requirements.
Key requirements may be missing from formal requirement specification.
1.3 Estimates,
assumptions and
constraints
Basis of estimating may be wrong.
Planning assumptions may be invalidated during project.
Imposed constraints may be relieved or removed.
1.4 Technical processes Standard processes may not meet requirements of specific solution.
New processes may be required.
Processes may be improved and made more effective.
1.5 Technology New technology may be developed during project lifetime.
Technology changes may invalidate design.
1.6 Technical interfaces Unexpected interactions may occur at key interfaces.
Data inconsistencies across interfaces may require rework.
Key interfaces may be reduced.
1.7 Design It may prove impossible to meet some requirements within design limitations.
Reuse of existing design elements may be possible.
1.8 Performance Final solution may not meet performance requirements.
Some performance requirements may be mutually exclusive.
1.9 Reliability &
maintainability
Target reliability criteria may be unattainable with chosen solution.
The use of innovative technology may improve reliability.
Maintainability requirements may impose unacceptable design constraints.
1.10 Safety ALARP solution may impose additional cost.
Changes in safety regulations may require significant redesign.
1.11 Security Security implications may be overlooked during design.
Government regulations may change during project.
0. PROJECT RISK
1. TECHNICAL RISK
1.12 Test & acceptance Test protocols may reveal significant design error requiring rework.
Client may withhold final acceptance for reasons outside contract.
© David Hillson and Peter Simon - 2007.
RBS LEVEL 0 RBS LEVEL 1 RBS LEVEL 2 EXAMPLE RISKS
Could this risk
affect our project?
Yes
No
Don’t know
Not applicable
2.1 Project management Project management systems may not be adequate to support project
requirements.
Poor decision-making may result in inappropriate task allocation.
Adoption of best practice risk process may improve project performance.
2.2 Programme/portfolio
management
Project may be given inappropriate priority within the programme.
Other projects may divert key resources.
Other projects may be cancelled and release resources.
2.3 Operations
management
Design may expose weaknesses in existing products or processes.
Business-as-usual demands may reduce project funding or contingency.
2.4 Organisation Reorganisation may impact project organisation (negatively or positively).
Changes in corporate structure may affect project (negatively or positively).
2.5 Resourcing Key resources may be unavailable when required.
Specific skills may not be available when required.
It may be possible to recruit existing subcontract staff permanently.
2.6 Communication The client’s requirement may be misunderstood.
Project reporting needs may change during project.
Key stakeholder interests may change (positively or negatively).
2.7 Information Client may fail to provide required information on time.
Client-supplied information may be inadequate to support project.
2.8 HS&E Health & safety legislation may change during the project.
An accident or incident may occur delaying the project.
2.9 Quality The number of defects found during integration may not match expectations
(higher or lower).
Quality circles may result in significant effort reduction.
Effective quality management may reduce rework.
2. MANAGEMENT RISK
2.10 Reputation Corporate reputation incident may damage support for the project.
Senior management may lose confidence in project team.
Improved reputation may increase availability of funds and resources.
3. COMMERCIAL RISK
3.1 Contractual terms &
conditions
Client standard terms may prove unacceptably onerous.
Contractual terms may contain internal inconsistencies.
Harmonised client/subcontractor terms may reduce risk exposure.
© David Hillson and Peter Simon - 2007.
RBS LEVEL 0 RBS LEVEL 1 RBS LEVEL 2 EXAMPLE RISKS
Could this risk
affect our project?
Yes
No
Don’t know
Not applicable
3.2 Internal procurement Other departments may not deliver as expected.
Required skills may not be available from other departments.
Internal support may increase as the project progresses.
3.3 Suppliers & vendors A key supplier may go out of business.
Mergers between suppliers may erode competitiveness.
Vendors may be able to deliver ahead of schedule.
3.4 Subcontracts Key subcontractors may refuse to work together.
Subcontract staff may take industrial action (strike).
Partnering with selected subcontractors may improve working relationships.
3.5 Client/customer
stability
Client may change business focus and withdraw support for project.
Changes in client personnel may require additional project management
effort.
Client may be bought out or merge with a more supportive company.
3.6 Partnerships & joint
ventures
Our partner may have competing commercial interests.
The joint venture may break up.
4.1 Legislation Changes in legislation may impose changes in the solution (positive or
negative).
Legal requirements may add unforeseen design requirements.
4.2 Exchange rates Exchange rates may change during the project (favourably or unfavourably).
Key suppliers may invoice in foreign currency.
4.3 Site/facilities Site access may prove more difficult than expected.
Required facilities may not be available on site.
New transport arrangements may ease project logistics.
4.4 Environmental/
weather
Weather may be unseasonable (better or worse than expected).
Unexpected environmental conditions may affect progress (positively or
negatively).
4.5 Competition A key competitor may launch a competing product and invalidate the project.
Key staff may be poached by competitors.
Key competitor may withdraw from the market.
4. EXTERNAL RISK
4.6 Regulatory Regulatory requirements may impose unexpected design constraints.
Significant changes in regulation may occur during the project (positive or
negative).
© David Hillson and Peter Simon - 2007.
RBS LEVEL 0 RBS LEVEL 1 RBS LEVEL 2 EXAMPLE RISKS
Could this risk
affect our project?
Yes
No
Don’t know
Not applicable
4.7 Political Political factors may influence senior management support for the project.
A change in government may result in changed priorities or legislation
(positively or negatively).
4.8 Country Local resources may lack the required skills.
Currency instability may undermine the business case for the project.
Local government interest in the project may change (positively or negatively).
4.9 Social/demographic Changing social imperatives may impose additional requirements.
Public perception of the project may change (positively or negatively).
4.10 Pressure groups Extremists may disrupt project progress.
Lobby groups may promote the cause of the project.
4.11 Force majeure Force majeure event may occur, disrupting the project.
Occurrence of force majeure may create an opportunity to address underlying
issues.
© David Hillson and Peter Simon - 2007.
1 of 4

Recommended

3 Dart Risk Management Case Study by
3 Dart Risk Management Case Study 3 Dart Risk Management Case Study
3 Dart Risk Management Case Study pmb25
2.1K views23 slides
Project Charter Summery by
Project Charter SummeryProject Charter Summery
Project Charter SummeryDerek Cooksey
1.4K views34 slides
PMP Lecture 4: Project Integration Management by
PMP Lecture 4: Project Integration ManagementPMP Lecture 4: Project Integration Management
PMP Lecture 4: Project Integration ManagementBenha University
6.1K views82 slides
Mitigation Plan In Risk Management PowerPoint Presentation Slides by
Mitigation Plan In Risk Management PowerPoint Presentation SlidesMitigation Plan In Risk Management PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Mitigation Plan In Risk Management PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
1.7K views39 slides
7 Steps Project Execution Process by
7 Steps Project Execution Process7 Steps Project Execution Process
7 Steps Project Execution ProcessC K Vishwakarma
26.5K views24 slides
Project Quality Management | Project Quality Control | Edureka by
Project Quality Management | Project Quality Control | EdurekaProject Quality Management | Project Quality Control | Edureka
Project Quality Management | Project Quality Control | EdurekaEdureka!
1.5K views25 slides

More Related Content

What's hot

Project Charter Template by
Project Charter TemplateProject Charter Template
Project Charter TemplateNaseer Muhammud
5.6K views5 slides
Project Resource Management by
Project Resource ManagementProject Resource Management
Project Resource ManagementCrysanthus Raharjo, PMP
12.6K views37 slides
Early contractor involvement (eci) procurement approach spm talk 2016 by
Early contractor involvement (eci) procurement approach   spm talk 2016Early contractor involvement (eci) procurement approach   spm talk 2016
Early contractor involvement (eci) procurement approach spm talk 2016teohwooisin
4.3K views86 slides
Project scope and requirements management by
Project scope and requirements managementProject scope and requirements management
Project scope and requirements managementtictactoe123
26.9K views39 slides
Pm final by
Pm finalPm final
Pm finalChong Yi Hui
442 views47 slides
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec... by
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...HIMADRI BANERJI
3.4K views47 slides

What's hot(20)

Early contractor involvement (eci) procurement approach spm talk 2016 by teohwooisin
Early contractor involvement (eci) procurement approach   spm talk 2016Early contractor involvement (eci) procurement approach   spm talk 2016
Early contractor involvement (eci) procurement approach spm talk 2016
teohwooisin4.3K views
Project scope and requirements management by tictactoe123
Project scope and requirements managementProject scope and requirements management
Project scope and requirements management
tictactoe12326.9K views
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec... by HIMADRI BANERJI
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...
Assessment of Risks in International EPC Projects Reference Current Global Ec...
HIMADRI BANERJI3.4K views
Project Management, Planning And Analysis Tools by ahmad bassiouny
Project Management, Planning And Analysis ToolsProject Management, Planning And Analysis Tools
Project Management, Planning And Analysis Tools
ahmad bassiouny12.7K views
Project execution and implementation by Dr. Saima Baig
Project execution and implementationProject execution and implementation
Project execution and implementation
Dr. Saima Baig1.2K views
13.2 Plan Stakeholder Engagement by DavidMcLachlan1
13.2 Plan Stakeholder Engagement13.2 Plan Stakeholder Engagement
13.2 Plan Stakeholder Engagement
DavidMcLachlan1771 views
Conveyor Belt Project Report by RISHABHSIINGH
Conveyor Belt Project ReportConveyor Belt Project Report
Conveyor Belt Project Report
RISHABHSIINGH3K views
How to set up initiatives portfolio management by Juha-Matti Saario
How to set up initiatives portfolio managementHow to set up initiatives portfolio management
How to set up initiatives portfolio management
Juha-Matti Saario932 views
Project Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation Slides by SlideTeam
Project Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation SlidesProject Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation Slides
SlideTeam3.7K views
Project Management PowerPoint Presentation Slides by SlideTeam
Project Management PowerPoint Presentation SlidesProject Management PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Management PowerPoint Presentation Slides
SlideTeam13.3K views

Similar to Example risk check list based on a risk breakdown structure

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE by
PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE
PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE S. Sathishkumar
61 views49 slides
challenges of highway projects in India by
challenges of highway projects in Indiachallenges of highway projects in India
challenges of highway projects in IndiaSanjay Kedia
135 views7 slides
An admittedly incomplete list of business components and possible risks by
An admittedly incomplete list of business components and possible risksAn admittedly incomplete list of business components and possible risks
An admittedly incomplete list of business components and possible risksSalt Marsh Solutions, Inc.
231 views4 slides
Pre-opening interior snagging services for luxury hotels by
Pre-opening interior snagging services for luxury hotelsPre-opening interior snagging services for luxury hotels
Pre-opening interior snagging services for luxury hotelsSamir Khosla
6K views23 slides
Oscpa webinar sox change readiness by
Oscpa webinar sox change readinessOscpa webinar sox change readiness
Oscpa webinar sox change readinessTiffany Crosby, Coach
423 views18 slides
Project management unit 5(1) by
Project management unit 5(1)Project management unit 5(1)
Project management unit 5(1)Rintu Das
5.1K views26 slides

Similar to Example risk check list based on a risk breakdown structure(20)

challenges of highway projects in India by Sanjay Kedia
challenges of highway projects in Indiachallenges of highway projects in India
challenges of highway projects in India
Sanjay Kedia135 views
Pre-opening interior snagging services for luxury hotels by Samir Khosla
Pre-opening interior snagging services for luxury hotelsPre-opening interior snagging services for luxury hotels
Pre-opening interior snagging services for luxury hotels
Samir Khosla6K views
Project management unit 5(1) by Rintu Das
Project management unit 5(1)Project management unit 5(1)
Project management unit 5(1)
Rintu Das5.1K views
GER_Project_Management_Ch22_summary.pdf by Tigabu Yaya
GER_Project_Management_Ch22_summary.pdfGER_Project_Management_Ch22_summary.pdf
GER_Project_Management_Ch22_summary.pdf
Tigabu Yaya1 view
How to Avoid Project Train Wrecks by Pete Luan
How to Avoid Project Train WrecksHow to Avoid Project Train Wrecks
How to Avoid Project Train Wrecks
Pete Luan246 views
Top 5 Pitfalls to Avoid Implemeting COSO 2013 by Aviva Spectrum™
Top 5 Pitfalls to Avoid Implemeting COSO 2013Top 5 Pitfalls to Avoid Implemeting COSO 2013
Top 5 Pitfalls to Avoid Implemeting COSO 2013
Aviva Spectrum™3.4K views
Scope cerrp vs golden plating by mohamed fawzy
Scope cerrp vs golden platingScope cerrp vs golden plating
Scope cerrp vs golden plating
mohamed fawzy317 views
Top 10 project mgt. problems by Maksudul Munna
Top 10 project mgt. problemsTop 10 project mgt. problems
Top 10 project mgt. problems
Maksudul Munna142 views
Project management (A Basic Approach) by Jed Concepcion
Project management (A Basic Approach)Project management (A Basic Approach)
Project management (A Basic Approach)
Jed Concepcion25 views
Implementation and Deployment - Best Practices for Managing Change by Peter Quintana
Implementation and Deployment - Best Practices for Managing ChangeImplementation and Deployment - Best Practices for Managing Change
Implementation and Deployment - Best Practices for Managing Change
Peter Quintana1K views
Managing the Construction Claims Effectively by SHAZEBALIKHAN1
Managing the Construction Claims EffectivelyManaging the Construction Claims Effectively
Managing the Construction Claims Effectively
SHAZEBALIKHAN157 views
SE_Lec 11_ Project Management by Amr E. Mohamed
SE_Lec 11_ Project ManagementSE_Lec 11_ Project Management
SE_Lec 11_ Project Management
Amr E. Mohamed609 views
Serhii Podlevskyi: PMO implementation - benefits and constraints (UA) by Lviv Startup Club
Serhii Podlevskyi: PMO implementation - benefits and constraints (UA)Serhii Podlevskyi: PMO implementation - benefits and constraints (UA)
Serhii Podlevskyi: PMO implementation - benefits and constraints (UA)

Recently uploaded

802.11 Computer Networks by
802.11 Computer Networks802.11 Computer Networks
802.11 Computer NetworksTusharChoudhary72015
9 views33 slides
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,... by
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...AakashShakya12
57 views115 slides
String.pptx by
String.pptxString.pptx
String.pptxAnanthi Palanisamy
47 views24 slides
A multi-microcontroller-based hardware for deploying Tiny machine learning mo... by
A multi-microcontroller-based hardware for deploying Tiny machine learning mo...A multi-microcontroller-based hardware for deploying Tiny machine learning mo...
A multi-microcontroller-based hardware for deploying Tiny machine learning mo...IJECEIAES
12 views10 slides
Multi-objective distributed generation integration in radial distribution sy... by
Multi-objective distributed generation integration in radial  distribution sy...Multi-objective distributed generation integration in radial  distribution sy...
Multi-objective distributed generation integration in radial distribution sy...IJECEIAES
15 views14 slides
Wire Rope by
Wire RopeWire Rope
Wire RopeIwiss Tools Co.,Ltd
9 views5 slides

Recently uploaded(20)

Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,... by AakashShakya12
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...
AakashShakya1257 views
A multi-microcontroller-based hardware for deploying Tiny machine learning mo... by IJECEIAES
A multi-microcontroller-based hardware for deploying Tiny machine learning mo...A multi-microcontroller-based hardware for deploying Tiny machine learning mo...
A multi-microcontroller-based hardware for deploying Tiny machine learning mo...
IJECEIAES12 views
Multi-objective distributed generation integration in radial distribution sy... by IJECEIAES
Multi-objective distributed generation integration in radial  distribution sy...Multi-objective distributed generation integration in radial  distribution sy...
Multi-objective distributed generation integration in radial distribution sy...
IJECEIAES15 views
Thermal aware task assignment for multicore processors using genetic algorithm by IJECEIAES
Thermal aware task assignment for multicore processors using genetic algorithm Thermal aware task assignment for multicore processors using genetic algorithm
Thermal aware task assignment for multicore processors using genetic algorithm
IJECEIAES30 views
An approach of ontology and knowledge base for railway maintenance by IJECEIAES
An approach of ontology and knowledge base for railway maintenanceAn approach of ontology and knowledge base for railway maintenance
An approach of ontology and knowledge base for railway maintenance
IJECEIAES12 views
2_DVD_ASIC_Design_FLow.pdf by Usha Mehta
2_DVD_ASIC_Design_FLow.pdf2_DVD_ASIC_Design_FLow.pdf
2_DVD_ASIC_Design_FLow.pdf
Usha Mehta19 views

Example risk check list based on a risk breakdown structure

  • 1. Example risk check list (based on a Risk Breakdown Structure) RBS LEVEL 0 RBS LEVEL 1 RBS LEVEL 2 EXAMPLE RISKS Could this risk affect our project? Yes No Don’t know Not applicable 1.1 Scope definition Scope changes may arise during project. Redundant scope may be discovered. 1.2 Requirements definition Client may introduce significant change during project (positive or negative). Internal inconsistencies may exist within requirements. Key requirements may be missing from formal requirement specification. 1.3 Estimates, assumptions and constraints Basis of estimating may be wrong. Planning assumptions may be invalidated during project. Imposed constraints may be relieved or removed. 1.4 Technical processes Standard processes may not meet requirements of specific solution. New processes may be required. Processes may be improved and made more effective. 1.5 Technology New technology may be developed during project lifetime. Technology changes may invalidate design. 1.6 Technical interfaces Unexpected interactions may occur at key interfaces. Data inconsistencies across interfaces may require rework. Key interfaces may be reduced. 1.7 Design It may prove impossible to meet some requirements within design limitations. Reuse of existing design elements may be possible. 1.8 Performance Final solution may not meet performance requirements. Some performance requirements may be mutually exclusive. 1.9 Reliability & maintainability Target reliability criteria may be unattainable with chosen solution. The use of innovative technology may improve reliability. Maintainability requirements may impose unacceptable design constraints. 1.10 Safety ALARP solution may impose additional cost. Changes in safety regulations may require significant redesign. 1.11 Security Security implications may be overlooked during design. Government regulations may change during project. 0. PROJECT RISK 1. TECHNICAL RISK 1.12 Test & acceptance Test protocols may reveal significant design error requiring rework. Client may withhold final acceptance for reasons outside contract. © David Hillson and Peter Simon - 2007.
  • 2. RBS LEVEL 0 RBS LEVEL 1 RBS LEVEL 2 EXAMPLE RISKS Could this risk affect our project? Yes No Don’t know Not applicable 2.1 Project management Project management systems may not be adequate to support project requirements. Poor decision-making may result in inappropriate task allocation. Adoption of best practice risk process may improve project performance. 2.2 Programme/portfolio management Project may be given inappropriate priority within the programme. Other projects may divert key resources. Other projects may be cancelled and release resources. 2.3 Operations management Design may expose weaknesses in existing products or processes. Business-as-usual demands may reduce project funding or contingency. 2.4 Organisation Reorganisation may impact project organisation (negatively or positively). Changes in corporate structure may affect project (negatively or positively). 2.5 Resourcing Key resources may be unavailable when required. Specific skills may not be available when required. It may be possible to recruit existing subcontract staff permanently. 2.6 Communication The client’s requirement may be misunderstood. Project reporting needs may change during project. Key stakeholder interests may change (positively or negatively). 2.7 Information Client may fail to provide required information on time. Client-supplied information may be inadequate to support project. 2.8 HS&E Health & safety legislation may change during the project. An accident or incident may occur delaying the project. 2.9 Quality The number of defects found during integration may not match expectations (higher or lower). Quality circles may result in significant effort reduction. Effective quality management may reduce rework. 2. MANAGEMENT RISK 2.10 Reputation Corporate reputation incident may damage support for the project. Senior management may lose confidence in project team. Improved reputation may increase availability of funds and resources. 3. COMMERCIAL RISK 3.1 Contractual terms & conditions Client standard terms may prove unacceptably onerous. Contractual terms may contain internal inconsistencies. Harmonised client/subcontractor terms may reduce risk exposure. © David Hillson and Peter Simon - 2007.
  • 3. RBS LEVEL 0 RBS LEVEL 1 RBS LEVEL 2 EXAMPLE RISKS Could this risk affect our project? Yes No Don’t know Not applicable 3.2 Internal procurement Other departments may not deliver as expected. Required skills may not be available from other departments. Internal support may increase as the project progresses. 3.3 Suppliers & vendors A key supplier may go out of business. Mergers between suppliers may erode competitiveness. Vendors may be able to deliver ahead of schedule. 3.4 Subcontracts Key subcontractors may refuse to work together. Subcontract staff may take industrial action (strike). Partnering with selected subcontractors may improve working relationships. 3.5 Client/customer stability Client may change business focus and withdraw support for project. Changes in client personnel may require additional project management effort. Client may be bought out or merge with a more supportive company. 3.6 Partnerships & joint ventures Our partner may have competing commercial interests. The joint venture may break up. 4.1 Legislation Changes in legislation may impose changes in the solution (positive or negative). Legal requirements may add unforeseen design requirements. 4.2 Exchange rates Exchange rates may change during the project (favourably or unfavourably). Key suppliers may invoice in foreign currency. 4.3 Site/facilities Site access may prove more difficult than expected. Required facilities may not be available on site. New transport arrangements may ease project logistics. 4.4 Environmental/ weather Weather may be unseasonable (better or worse than expected). Unexpected environmental conditions may affect progress (positively or negatively). 4.5 Competition A key competitor may launch a competing product and invalidate the project. Key staff may be poached by competitors. Key competitor may withdraw from the market. 4. EXTERNAL RISK 4.6 Regulatory Regulatory requirements may impose unexpected design constraints. Significant changes in regulation may occur during the project (positive or negative). © David Hillson and Peter Simon - 2007.
  • 4. RBS LEVEL 0 RBS LEVEL 1 RBS LEVEL 2 EXAMPLE RISKS Could this risk affect our project? Yes No Don’t know Not applicable 4.7 Political Political factors may influence senior management support for the project. A change in government may result in changed priorities or legislation (positively or negatively). 4.8 Country Local resources may lack the required skills. Currency instability may undermine the business case for the project. Local government interest in the project may change (positively or negatively). 4.9 Social/demographic Changing social imperatives may impose additional requirements. Public perception of the project may change (positively or negatively). 4.10 Pressure groups Extremists may disrupt project progress. Lobby groups may promote the cause of the project. 4.11 Force majeure Force majeure event may occur, disrupting the project. Occurrence of force majeure may create an opportunity to address underlying issues. © David Hillson and Peter Simon - 2007.