3. MANA333543464346
Path-GoalTheory
3
• Leaders adapt their
behavior based on their
followers’ characteristics
and the characteristics of
the task
• Perceptions that leaders are
treating each follower
differently
5. MANA333543464346
Instructions
• Pat Howard is the supervisor with 4
different employees who each have
unique characteristics. Pat’s job is to
meet with 3 of those employees to
motivate them toward better/higher
performance
• Pat – take 5 minutes to plan your
approach with each employee
• Employees – think about what you hope
to get out of this meeting & how to give
feedback
5
6. MANA333543464346
Instructions
• First round
• 5 minutes to meet with each employee
• 1 minute for self-evaluation (Pat) or
leader evaluation (employee)
• Employees will switch to new Pat
• Second Round
• 3 minutes for employees to provide
feedback to each Pat they met with
6
9. MANA333543464346
ClassDiscussion
What were the different employee characteristics?
Employees:
• What made some supervisors more or
less effective than others?
• What differences did you observe in the
behavior of the different supervisors?
• What was effective? What was
ineffective?
Pats:
• Did you vary your behavior with
different subordinates?
• Did some behaviors appear to be more
effective with one person than with
another?
9
What leadership style(s) should be most effective for each of the subordinates? Why?
10. MANA333543464346
Prompt
10
In class, we saw that it can be effective for leaders
to behave differently with subordinates based on
their ability and motivation as well as other
situational constraints. The result of using an
adaptable leadership style is that you will treat
subordinates differently.
• Have you experienced a leader that treats
subordinates differently?
• What were your perceptions of that leader, and
why?
• How would you ensure that subordinates
perceive you as fair and not playing favorites,
disingenuous, or “wishy-washy”?
Use this opportunity to talk to the “employees” about what good feedback looks like
Often the feedback we provide is too general. Imagine give feedback to a member of your team – “her meeting agendas looked great, but she needed to improve her presentation skills”
This kinds of feedback tends to result in more questions than answers – and rarely actually leads to behavior change.
She was left thinking "What's good about my agendas that I can transfer to other documents?" and "What's wrong with my presentation skills?"
Instead try this formula for feedback, developed by the Center for Creative Leadership,
1. Situation
First define the where and when of the situation you're referring to. This puts the feedback into context and gives the other person a specific setting as a reference.
For example: "During yesterday morning's team meeting, when you gave your presentation..."
2. Behavior
Then describe the specific behaviors that you want to address. This is the most challenging part, because you must communicate only the behaviors that you observed directly.
Avoid making subjective judgments about those behaviors or why they occurred. You could be wrong, and this will undermine your feedback.
"During yesterday morning's team meeting, when you gave your presentation, you were uncertain about two of the slides and your sales calculations were incorrect."
Don’t say - "During yesterday morning's team meeting, you made mistakes because you did prepare thoroughly.”
3. Impact
Use "I" statements to describe how the other person's action has affected you or others.
"During yesterday morning's team meeting, when you gave your presentation, you were uncertain about two of the slides and your sales calculations were incorrect. I felt embarrassed because the entire board was there. I'm worried that this has affected the reputation of our team."
When you structure feedback in this way, your people will understand precisely what you are commenting on and why. And when you outline the impact of their behavior on others, you're giving them the chance to reflect on their actions and think about what they need to change.