How Does Total War Affect Society

How Does Total War Affect Society
Evidently, total war has explicitly affected all aspects of society and has even influenced the way people lived their lives. Firstly, total war was
embedded into the education system, as "The Canada War Book" was given to students in New Brunswick. The book itself teaches children to save
because there isn't an abundance of money in Canada and additionally, the book includes more propaganda, as it portrays going to war as a soldier or
nurse to be very desirable. Secondly, there were books published to specifically feed one hundred soldiers, thus impacting the food aspect of society.
The recipes found in the book are economical and precise, as the recipes avoid the use of seasonings to make the meals cheaper and specific weights are
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

World War I: A Total War
It has often been argued that the First World War was an example of a total war. In order to understand whether World War I was a total war for the
British Empire it is necessary to first define what a total war is. According to the Oxford Dictionary total war can be defined as, "A war that is
unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are
disregarded." From this definition two important characteristics of total war can be seen. First, a total war will be fought without restrictions on the
weapons used. This utilization of weapons will ignore previous laws and agreements concerning the use of weapons. Second, a total war will ignore the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This characteristic of total war is best exemplified by the British use of chemical weapons throughout the First World War, particularly the use of
poison gases. The use of poison gases was deemed ethically troubling on the battlefield even before they were first weaponized. This can be seen
in the Hague Convention of 1899 which banned the use of "projectiles with the sole object to spread asphyxiating poisonous gases." The main
cause of this distaste likely relates to the terrifying nature of chemical gas attacks. In the words of Palazzo, "war gases kill by denying their victims
the ability to breathe, a violation of man's most essential and instinctive functions." This distaste for the weapons did not last long in the face of the
First World War however. The German's were the first nation to engage in chemical warfare, but the other nations quickly joined in on the use of
chemical weapons. The British first attempted to utilize gas weapons at the Battle of Loos in 1915, but the result was an abysmal failure for the
British forces. Despite this failure the British continued to develop their chemical weapons capabilities. These weapons became an important
component of artillery barrages on all sides of the battlefield. The utilization of these weapons, which had been banned in the Hague Convention of
1899 is a clear example of the British willingness to utilize any weapon system available to them that would maximize their chances at winning the
war. This is a clear indication that the First World War was a total War for the

A New Type Of Warfare Total War
Arguably the bloodiest war in American history, the Civil War introduced a new type of warfare
–total war. In total war, all resources are poured into
military power, and any beneficial facilities are used by the military, including transportation and communication. This new type of warfare would prove
to be very effective and unforgiving in the battles to come. With the invention of new types of troop and supply transports, as well as the invention of
the telegraph, the war faced a new era of modern combat. Prior to the Civil War, the antebellum period of America brought forth a miniature
technological revolution. Starting with canals, private American companies began investing in building new ways to connect the country. After the
construction of the Erie Canal, America experienced a boom of canal–building that lasted into the 1840s when railroads surpassed them in efficiency.
Railroads proved to be faster, more direct, and more reliable than their canal or turnpike cousins. The rail system grew so quickly that in the 1830s
there was more milage of railroad tracks than there were canals. Soon, the eastern coast was connected to the western side of the Mississippi River,
Chicago, and the Great Lakes. Since most of the railroad milage was located in the North, this would provide the Union with a strategical advantage
when the battles began. Realizing their potential, Abraham Lincoln ordered the Union to utilize the railroads to their full extent, moving valuable

Ww1 Total War
Total war is a military conflict in which each of the participating nations mobilize all available resources in order to completely extinguish another
nation's ability to engage in warfare. The utilization of the governments, economies and populations of the participating nations in WW1 reached an
extent never seen before in history. Awar economy was adopted throughout Britain, France and Germany. The mass manufacturing of weapons,
munitions and other war material was prioritized, and with the mass leap of technology, it indeed affected the outcome and the nature of WW1.
As in the wars prior to WW1, artillery was a key component and a prerequisite for battlefield success. Artillery proved to be a crucial aspect and the
number one threat to infantry and tanks alike. Artillery came in several light, medium and heavy forms. Furthermore, field guns served in the direct
line of sight role whilst mortars and howitzers allowed for indirect fire support. Howitzers were established in order to be used under cover or against
hidden targets. They fired shells on a high trajectory through a short barrel and were considered the best gun to employ against fortifications. The
mortar was also similar in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Germany was the first to make large scale use of poison gas as a weapon. On 31 January 1915 18,000 artillery shells containing liquid xylyl bromide
tear gas (known as T–Stoff) were fired on Russian positions on the Rawka River, west of Warsaw during the Battle of Bolimov. Instead of vaporizing
the chemical froze, completely failing to have an impact. Unlike most weapons of the time it was possible to develop countermeasures to the various
gas agents and hence in the latter stages of warfare and with the increased utilization of gas, the effectiveness was

Editha Character Analysis
Sometimes the consequences of war are overlooked because of the circumstances. In this story, William Dean Howells uses his characters to convey
his own views on war. One can easily tell that he was in no way a supporter. He does an outstanding job demonstrating the many reasons war is
harmful. Through the main character of his story "Editha", William Dean Howells reveals that war is not glorious, but is instead destructive.
Editha's character conveys the ignorance of the common people by highlighting the impractical ideas she has about the war. Her beliefs gave a false
hope and an unrealistic expectation as to what the ramifications of war actually are. From evidence in the story, one would infer that the story was set
during the Spanish–American ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Not only does war impact American families, but also America's "enemies" families. War is heartbreaking, so it is unsettling that Editha chose to
ignore the consequences of war just because George is fighting under the American flag. When the two were discussing the war, Editha states that
"there are no two sides anymore" and "there is nothing now but our country" (Howells). As long as America is first, she has no regards for anyone
else in the world. She is justifying the murder of people in the name of American patriotism. This almost makes the lives taken during war seem
less valuable, which is unacceptable. Through a letter that Editha wrote to George, she affirms her unawareness regarding war. In the letter, she
states that if George does not enlist, she will break off the engagement because "the man she would marry must be devoted to his country first"
(Free). Editha lives in Northern New York, where it is difficult to see the repercussions of war. Because of this, Editha does not seem to care that war
affects every country involved, not just America. At the end of the story when Editha visits the Gearson family, Mrs. Gearson remarks "you thought it
would be all right for my George, your George, to kill the sons of those miserable mothers and the husbands of those girls that you would never see
the faces of" (Howells). Her sarcasm emphasizes her strong

Medieval Total War
Creating a video game genre entirely of its own, the popular and successful Total War series offers six titles to date with a seventh near completion
due for release in the fall of 2008. The first game Shogun Total War was a cut above the rest for its time where players chose one of the main
feudal Japanese factions and vied for a unified ancient Japan. There was a strategic phase where players ruled their lands and a battle mode where
players controlled their units like chess pieces from a 'god mode' like view. Then came Medieval Total War with some improvements to the concept.
'Medieval Total War (1)' took the game to feudal Europe, Northern Africa, and part of the Middle East. Improvements included more manageable armies
in the combat... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Ratings: Graphics & Audio: 24/25, Gameplay: 23/25, Creativity 22/25, Fun 21/25 Total: 90/100 Creative Assembly brings the next strategy game
in the Total War and Shogun series that combines the day to day management of your clan in turn based strategy along with real time battles. Total
War: Shogun 2 brings the best of both worlds of real time war and turn based strategy management for an interesting and dynamic gaming
experience. Total War: Shogun 2 starts you out as clan Overlord of one of the provinces of Japan in the 16th century where you do some basic
management of resources, education and religion along with diplomatic relations. During your course of steering your province through the
events of the 16th century you will encounter in battle other clans which you need to prepare for. You build your province both in the public order
and maintaining the affairs of your clan but also with the protection needed of the day. Warriors and armies will include the sword swinging
popular Japanese soldiers as well as bow and arrows or spear carrying soldiers of the time. You get to control each group of warriors you build in
battle but you first need to recruit each set of soldiers during the turn based gaming. Each part of the game, turn based management and real time
strategy, is separate and distinct for a good break from time to time in each area of gaming. You start the campaign of Shogun 2 by choosing one
nine clans and several time frames to battle your way to Kyoto in using both diplomacy and war. The main goal of the campaigns is to seize control
of Kyoto and you have a variety of time frames to choose from do accomplish this. Each clan you can choose from has a specialty like woods for
bowmen and you get a bonus for recruiting

The Pros And Cons Of Total War
Almost 70 years has being passed since the last world war was declared its end. These days, it is said that if the third world war is occurred in the
current world, it should be a total warfare with nuclear weapons (Gunn, 2004:70). In general the World War II (WWII) is often considered as a case
of total war; now, there can be a question about the existence of total war in the world history. The essay is going to discuss the statement, the WWII
is a complete example of total war, with referring to definitions of total war and a comparison between the WWI and WWII. Basically according to the
oxford dictionary, there are several elements which link to total war, which are unrestricted weapons used, territory or combatants involved, objective...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On these two points, Gunn (2004) strongly suggested that the WWII was surely a total war without any pieces of morality human beings should
have. This is a reason that civilians without any means of fights are considered as acceptable armies' target due to the efforts by citizens for their
national ability to wage war (Gunn, 2004:66). What can be the most important tip here is a distinction from the sentence, involving all of the people
to encourage their national ability to wage the war. This is because that the idea is not able to define the WWII only as a total war; in other word, it
also fits for the situation of the WWI. Especially at the time of WWI in the Britain, tons of women was sent to factories that manufactured military
planes and atomic bombs instead of male labours sent to battlefields (Marwick, 1968). Furthermore, even in other countries during both WWI and II,
young children and women were actively encouraged to support their nation as not only manufactory workers but also nursing staffs who would be
dispatched toward actual battle–ground. Even there is an exceptional example, Japanese law of total war in 1925. The difference between WWI and II,
which should be focused on, is that non–resisting citizens, towns or cities not defended were not basically considered as targets of

World War 1 Total War Essay
2. Other than the fact that WW1 involved so many different nations, what else qualifies it as a "total war?" Do you think this was the world's first
"total war?" why or why not? Total war is defined as "conflict in which the contenders are willing to make any sacrifice in lives and other resources to
obtain a complete victory (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2018)." In August 01, 1914, Austria–Hungary declared war on Serbia after the heir to the throne,
Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and his wife Sophie of Austria were assassinated by Gavrilo Princip, of Serbian decent. This atrocious and inhuman act of
violence was the one to fuel "both imperialism and nationalism coming together and fueling nations into war (Pavlac 322)." Shortly after war began,
nations around the world began to align themselves with one–another as means to protect themselves. In one end you had the Triple alliance created by
Chancellor Bismarck that aimed "to preserve the newly united Germany from French revenge". On the other Triple Entente: France, Great Britain, and
Russia united.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He believed that he could influence and change the world by remaining "neutral". The idea of neutrality was then obscured by actions committed by the
German military when one of their torpedoes sank and killed passengers aboard the Lusitania. The British liner en–route to Liverpool, England carried
more than 1900 passengers and crew members on board, killing 120 Americans (1915, 2018). Although the US could supply nations with food and
artillery because it remained neutral this event brought the war closer to home. The oceans could no longer be used to transport goods and people
without safety. And nearly two years after war broke, President Wilson formally entered WWI. It is argued that the sinking of Lusitania played a
significant role in

Total War In Britain
Source E is a secondary interpretation on the idea of 'Total War' in Britain from the book 'The Making of Modern Britain' written and published by
Andrew Marr in 2009. Marr talks about how civilians were impacted throughout both wars, but argues that WW2 was more of a total war than
WW1 was as "the entire economy was mobilized". This source is secondary. Andrew Marr was born in 1959, meaning that he was not alive during
any of these World Wars. This would mean that he would not have been there and so he cannot truly know what it was like. However, due to the
advancement of technology, he had a larger access to a number of resources that were not available at the time. This source does not directly link to
any civilian impacts, but Marr briefly comments on several impacts that did occur... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
a daily ration of meat and bread). Marr is a political broadcaster and journalist, suggesting that this source may be somewhat biased. Whilst discussing
WW2, he says that the war became the 'People's war' and that the entire economy was mobilized which led to new rules, taxes and restrictions being
put in place on British citizens. This source does not it does say how civilians were impacted, it does not directly comment on how theses factors
impacted civilian life, therefore meaning that this source is not representative. After looking at many reviews on the book, I have found that many
historians perceive the book to be historically

Transition To Total War
Total war breaks down the line separating combatants and non–combatants through a series of ideological and social justifications that allowed for
barbaric acts to be committed. A war becomes total when the nation itself must dedicate every facet of its existence as a state to the war effort. The
general population being brought into the war effort brings to question their innocence, thus making them targets for the enemy. The transition from a
small scale war into a total war is a gradual process, as adjusting a nation's economy and society to feed the war is a long and difficult process.
The transition to total war depends mainly on the length of the war and the number of casualties. A short war would not require the kind of resources
and civilian support that an expansive war would require. The Great War is often cited as being the first total war, and that is clear through the
population's view of the war as well as the soldier's. A total war can only happen if nationalism and patriotism are high and on nearly all fronts
nationalism is what rooted the soldiers in the trenches and gave them the determination. Nationalism also gave the non–combatants on the home front a
reason to support the war in other ways.
From the start this war was a different type than the cabinet style wars that were fought in the past ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Clemenceau's call for nothing but war stood in stark contrast to the church's pacifism, if France were to succeed in the war, there would be no room
for peace demonstrations. Detrimental opinions to the morale of the war were a matter of life and death when it came to France's existence and ability
to fight. His bellicose language was both inspiring and damaging to the war effort, destroying the Union Sacree that had held the political groups
together up until this

Evil nationalism in total war
During 1914, the entire Europe was a powder keg filled not with gunpowder, but pride. Finally, it blew up with the assassination of the Austrian
archduke Franz Ferdinand in the 28th of June. While Franz Ferdinand was on his way to examine Serbia, he was assassinated by the Serbian nationalist
(Sowards). In response to this action, Austrian angrily announced an ultimatum to Serbia, which strictly demanded Serbia to end all anti–Austrian
agitation and punish any Serbian official whoever involved in the murder plot. However, the refusal of the demand gives many extreme nations like
Germany an opportunity to show and test their army. Meanwhile, nations like Germany has a very strong nationalism thinking in their mind, which
helped them to... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Overall, although nationalism improves Britain's navy and industrialization, it also damaged Britain's economy, which after the war Britain was
suffering for restoring economy and repair war damaged.
Although nationalism is the major causes for the beginning of the World War I, some people think that nationalism has no connection to it. Many
people think that the start of World War I is causes by Austria wanting to take revenge on the Serbian and therefore send massive troops to the front
line a fought Serbian. However, without nationalism in Serbia, the Austrian archduke would never be assassinated and as a result Austria has no
reason to declared war on Serbia. In the process of World War I turning into total war, many people think that it turn into a total war is the war stuck
in the stalemate for many years and both sides of the alliance wants to end the war as soon as possible, as a result, put all their effort into the war.
However, if nationalism in Russia never felt having responsibilities on helping Serbia, the war won't even turn into a global war that evolved many
power in Europe. Also, without nationalism in Russia, she won't mobilized that much of forces to the front line and therefore other nations don't need
to mobilized the same amount of the troops to either defend or defeat them. As a result, without nationalism, the war will not stuck in a stalemate that

Cold War Total War
The French Revolution and Napoleonic warfare introduced a new way to wage war, a type of total warfare which encompassed the country as a
whole. "Universal conscription referred to as levee en masse made the French army the largest in Europe and also the easiest to keep up to strength."
("Napoleon and the Revolution in war" Peter Paret. Makers of Modern Strategy from Machiavelli to the nuclear age (1986) page 126). In the century
that followed, statesman and military leaders were of the mindset that total war was the way to achieve decisive victories.
This total war way of thinking led to many conflicts which included World War I and World War II, as well as many other high intensity conflicts,
prior to and in between the world wars. After ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Super powers, as well as most of the developed world, believed the planet was continually on the verge of nuclear Armageddon, but theCold War ended
with the collapse of the Soviet Union. This collapse left the United States as the sole super power and in the role of the world police. Since the United
States was left as the most powerful country in the world, it assumed the responsibility of de–escalating conflicts and promoting global peace and
security: a role the United States continues to play in order to maintain access and to protect its global interests. As the world was learning the rules of
post–Cold War warfare, events took a sharp turn into asymmetric warfare, a type of warfare we have been engaged in since the mid–2000s, and a type
of warfare that continues to challenge the free world today. With adversaries closing the gap in technology and engaging non–state actors, these
parameters are definitely contributing towards limited war. Also, in this age of information and technology, it would be difficult to gain public
support for a total war since it would constitute unnecessary destruction and needless loss of life. Instead, adversaries engage in cyber war with the
aim of crippling and delaying technological advances as well as disrupting services for the

Total War Dbq Essay
Throughout history, there have been a multitude of examples of wars brought too close to home. At times, there comes a point in war where
consideration of innocent lives becomes thin, and all energy is put towards war efforts, rather than any other aspect of human life. These points in
history are referred to as total war. Examples of total war can be seen as far back as in the ancient civilizations of Rome and Persia, however, the
paragon of total war can be found in World War Two. Based on the overall involvement of a vast multitude of civilians, economies and countries
targeted and impacted throughout the war, World War Two is the strongest example of total war in American history. To begin with, World War Two
shows the most instances ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An example of this is the extremely well–known poster of Rosie the Riveter created by J. Howard Miller. The poster reads, "We can do it!"
(Document B), and was meant to encourage women to join the workforce while men were fighting, specifically in the weapon production field
(History.com). This is an instance in which the United States tried to devote all resources to the war. Rather than staying at home and practicing
the life of a stereotypical woman during the time, women were motivated to take on new responsibility in order to provide for the war effort,
putting the war above all things. Another American example would be that of food rations during the war time period. Assigned by the Office of
Price Administration, "The ration books contained removable stamps good for certain rationed items, like sugar, meat, cooking oil, and canned
goods" (Document C). The rations were put into place so that these types of resources could be contributed to the war effort (National Park Service),
which is a clear example of a country devoting all of its resources to the war. The civilians were forced to make sacrifices for the ultimate goal of
keeping the war a priority. Another more blatant example of this during the war can be found in the Soviet

Democracies are more likely to win вЂњTotal WarsвЂќ than...
The term 'total war' has been attributed to a small number of conflicts. The term was originally coined by the German military officer Erich Ludendorff
in his book 'The Total War'. Previous to this the renowned military theorists Carl von Clausewitz and Antoine
–Henri Jomini both touched on the raw
principles of 'total war', but failing to ever recognise the term Ludendorff went on to fashion. It was not until the 1950s that the term re–emerged to
describe the nature of the conflict during the First and Second World Wars, whilst a number of wars previous to this have characteristics of 'total wars',
the primitive state of national economies and refusal to fully mobilise the economy purely for war can explain why these conflicts were more... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The use of violence to repress and monitor was a common theme used by dictators to 'control' their peoples. This was uncommon in democracies, for
example the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill did not have his own personal guard, answerable only to himself; it was Churchill who was
scrutinized by the people, the reverse of the situation pertaining in both Germany and the Soviet Union. Totalitarianism endangers the stability of a
nation as there will be "growing internal unrest due to the excesses of terrorism, the denial of rights and the inability of large segments of the
population to participate in public affairs ". It was these basic democratic principles which were absent throughout the totalitarian regimes of the 20th
Century; as a single man's ideology was allowed to develop unrestricted, with little input from either a strong government or the general public.
In the autocratic governments of wartime Europe the chain of command was rigidly maintained from the top down, unlike democracies where the
chain was more susceptible to variation. The effects of the totalitarian administrative structure manifest themselves in subordinates' inability to question
orders and policies which leads to further disregard for the negative consequences of such commands. A fine example of this would be German high
command's inability to make intuitive judgements without the Fuhrer's expressed permission, on the day of

Total War Is A Good Prime Example Of World War Two
Definition: Resources are devoted. This was the main concept of Total War. There are many examples of to why Total war is a good prime example
of World War 2. World War 2 is known as the "quintessential" of total war. Because of the levels of national mobilization and the resources for both
sides of conflicts its being contested. Also the scale for armies, air forces and more raised through conscription, which is known for an active target.
This would be of non combatants. The general would/will disregard for the damage and with the unrestricted aims would mark on total war.
Mass Production Welfare: The allied powers during world war 2 were USA, britain and USSR. The axis during world war 2 where Germany, italy,
and japan. When it came to

What Caused The French Revolution?
What caused the French Revolution to radicalize? Historians such as Timothy Tackett and David A. Bell explore that question implicitly in When the
King Took Flight and The First Total War respectively. Although they are two profoundly different books, both point to fear as a causal force in the
radicalization of the Revolution. However, Tackett suggests that the flight of the King created fears of counterrevolutionary conspiracies and
suspicion as a result of France's regime changes and polarization and thus radicalized Paris. While Bell argues that increased military modification
and war caused fear and radicalization in France. The authors do not explicitly explain what they mean by "radical," but from the evidence and events
that they describe, one can deduce their definitions. After the king's flee from the Tuileries, Tackett describes radical as certain political groups acting
on and demanding for extreme measures such as violent demonstrations of deposing the king in favor of a republic. Bell, on the other hand, defines
radical differently. Radical according to Bell is people's paranoia and fears to the extreme of killing hundreds of people who did not agree with the
revolutionary ideal.
Although The First Total Wardoes not center on one event like When the King Took Flight does, Bell, like Tackett, describes how fear was a prime
factor in radicalizing the revolution. Bell explores numerous events following the fall of the Bastille, and despite, the

The Pros And Cons Of A Total War
A total war is a conflict which involves bringing together resources; this includes both industrial and military resources aiming at having an output
that the enemy will not overcome at all (Castellano, 2016). The biggest difference that exists between a total war and a normal war is that there is
really zero difference between those fighting in the same war and the civilians in this period; all these people are considered an enemy. In that case,
the World War I should be taken as a total war since it was a complete contrast to the sort of limited wars that were experienced in the 18th century that
were always small, where people did try to avoid battle; they made sure that they did not touch the society nor continue with the trading systems... Show
There were over ten million deaths that were reported during this period hence making this war the most lethal war that was ever experienced in this
world as at that time. There was also a significant amount of government interference experienced at this time leading to extreme measures and
directives that came directly from national governments (Coffman, 2014). This was brought about by one of the most lethal differences ever in the
20th century; sparked by rage and a desire to revenge by all the countries. This war brought in a lot of losses including some agricultural losses in the
period as such. The governments in this case completely misjudged the war and invested a lot of machinery in it and finances at the time. This was as
a result of the desire to try and win this war

The Age Of The Robot Warrior Machine
The age of the robot warrior machine is looming, and it will represent monumental changes in the future conduct of war. Increased precision and
decreased risk make the automation of warriors politically and militarily attractive. Government and military leaders will have to address the numerous
moral and ethical questions about when, where and how to utilize these lifeless soldiers. To answer similar questions in the past, many leaders relied on
the military theory from the Prussian theorist Carl Von Clausewitz' book "On War". Even though his theories have proven helpful in the past, can the
ideas written in the 1800's, truly be useful when applied to such drastic changes in the future conduct of war?
Clausewitz military genius is immutable. Even though his writings are almost two hundred years old, the application of Carl Von Clausewitz' theories
on war are relevant for today and in the future. Technological advancements will present unique challenges, but as long as the true nature of war
remains unaffected, his paradoxical trinity will continue to provide visionary insight and value to future leaders attempting to address wars' most
difficult questions. The distinction between absolute vs. real war and his theories on the relationship between war and politics, and the concept of
friction remain timeless. What we are really dealing with is another change in the character of war which Clausewitz has helped leaders deal with in
the past and will again in the future.

World War One: A Total War
Nationalism started a small war between Serbia and Austria–Hungary. Through alliances, imperialism, and militarism more countries joined creating a
bigger war called World War One. A total war is a war which mobilizes the whole population and all available resources, while also covering a wide
geographic area. World War One had a wide geographic area, the whole population was mobilized, and the government controlled all aspects of
daily life/economy, therefore, World War One was a total war. World war One was a total war because it was fought over wide geographic area
because it included the Battle of Gallipoli (Mitchell 2004). The battle of Gallipoli was over who controlled the sea route from Europe to Russia during
World War One. The allied... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Serbia the government controlled their life, for example Serbia want to declare a general mobilization on the Austrians(Mihajlovic 2004) .
People rushed to get newspapers that were forced carry the Proclamation to the Nation (Mihajlovic 2004). The government started to make the
German women work in the factories all day while all the men were fighting, while at the end of the day still expecting them to come home and
care for their children (Kuhr 2004). The girls also to end up selling their hair for fatherland and military purposes. The government did not care
how the women were treat. The families were low on bread and had to save it for the soldiers while the children went hungry (Kuhr 2004). In
conclusion, World War One was a total war. It mobilized all of the population for example everyone was involved. WW1 was fought over a wide
geographic area for example the German Zeppelin finally was able to reach Britain. The government started to control all daily aspects of life for
example women were forced to work in factories and come home and take care of their

Total War During World War II
Definition:
What is meant by the concept of Total War? Total war is best described as a country's 100% effort. All means of production and accomplishment are
geared towards what is the best way to win a war.
How was WWII the maximum example of Total War? Most Allies and Axis countries, namely Germany, had geared their economy towards pouring all
their resources into the attempt of winning the war. In no other war was this done as much as it was during World War II.
Mass Produced Warfare:
Compare the military production of the various major Allied and Axis powers during WWII. What observations can you make about the outcome of the
war based on this information? There are many ways of defining military production, but in the broadest way, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
By not taking in other factors, and by looking at production amounts only, it is obvious that the Allies would win. There was no means of resources
that the Axis powers excelled in, and had few people who fought in the war. Both sides of the war had at this time undergone industrial revolutions, had
at least somewhat equal caliber machinery. This means that it would be almost physically impossible for the Axis to defeat the Allies.
Strategic Bombing:
What do the websites say about the effectiveness of bombing campaigns in disrupting the war effort of the Axis during WWII? According to the
majority of the information on the websites, the bombing campaigns put in place by the Allies were not very effective. The main goal of the
bombing campaigns were to break the morale of the Axis citizens, specifically Germany. This was done by instead of fully wiping out cities, leaving
them only half damaged to show the power of the armies. However, these bombings did little to no damage to the will of Germans. People still were
willing to support the Nazi cause. The German economy was very much destroyed, thanks to the bombing efforts, but military production was still
proceeding, as the Germans were prepared for the Total War involved. It is also stated that as a result of the bombings, Germany's mobility was
shrunken, as they could not move as fast as they wanted.
What about the collateral damage involved? The amount of collateral damage that the

WWII: A Total War
WWII is said to be the last total war of the modern era and there is clear evidence as to why. Many countries, including the United States, were
solely focused on winning the war. Roughly 17 million new jobs became available to civilians in the United States to help the war effort, from
ordinary factories changing their production to start producing military vehicles to making ammunition. Every country involved in WWII had their
resources going directly toward the war efforts. Civilians were also targeted on both sides to obtain power in the war, leading to civilian casualties
ranging from 50 to 55 million. There were no restrictions on what weapons could be used or who/what could be targeted. Both the Axis powers and
the Allied powers did what they deemed necessary to win the war.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
atomic bombs, Little Boy and Fat Boy, on Hiroshima and Nagasaki; leading to an estimated 200,000

econ Essay
Microeconomics Homework
Problem 1: C(Q) = 100 + 20Q + 15Q^2 + 10Q^3
a) Fixed Cost (doesn't change depending on output produced) = 100
b) Variable Cost of producing Q = 10 units: 20*10 + 15*10^2 + 10*10^3 = 200 + 1,500 + 10,000 = 11,700
c) Total Cost of producing Q = 10 units: C(10) = 100 + 20*10 + 15*10^2 + 10*10^3 = 11,800 Alternatively, we have TotalCosts of Producing Q=10
units = Fixed Costs + Variable Costs of producing Q = 10 units = 100 + 11,700 = 11,800
d) Average Fixed Cost = Total Fixed Costs / Output = 100/10 = 10
e) Average Variable Cost = Total Variable Costs of producing Q= 10 units / Output = 11,700/10 = 1,170
f) AverageTotal Cost = Total Costs of producing Q=10 units / ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(c) The inverse demand function will give us the equilibrium price by inputting the equilibrium output
P* = 200 – 3(Q1* + Q2*)
P* = 200 – 3(18 + 20) = 86
P* = 86
(d) Profit = Revenue – Cost = P x Q – C(Q)
Firm 1's Profit = 86*20 – 26*20 = $1200
Firm 2's Profit = 86*18 – 54*18 = $972
Hence, according to the Cournot model, firm 1 will produce more than firm 2 resulting in a profit greater than that earned by firm 2.
Problem 8:–
Cournot Model:–
The Inverse Demand function is as follows:
P = 600 – 3Q1 – 3Q2 c1 = c2 = 300 = marginal cost of both firms
Comparing the inverse demand function to the P = a – b(Q1 + Q2) form we get, a = 600 ; b = 3

We arrive at the equilibrium output using the reaction functions for both firms which we get by equating the firm's Marginal Revenue to Marginal Cost
to maximise profits:–
Firm 1's Reaction Function: Q1 = (a – c1)/2b – Q2/2
Q1 = 300/6 – Q2/2 = 50 – Q2/2
Also,
Firm 2's Reaction Function: Q2 = (a – c2)/2b – Q1/2
в†’ Q2 = 50 – Q1/2
Solving both equations, Q1 = Q2 = 100/3 = 33.33
Price = 600 – 100 – 100 = 400
Firm 1's profit – P*Q1 – C*Q1 = 400*100/3 – 300*100/3 = 10,000/3 = $3,333.33
Firm 2's profit – P*Q2 – C*Q2 = 400*100/3 – 300*100/3 = 10,000/3 = $3,333.33
Stackelberg Model:–
In the

Ryanair's Pricing Strategy Of Ryan Air
Ryanair positioned itself as a low cost airline, which delivered services equivalent to that of British Airways and Aer Lingus. In terms of service
quality, they positioned themselves in the same category as the aforementioned airlines, but at the same time, charging a relatively low price when
compared to British Airways and Aer Lingus. Their strategy was to deliver first rate/ good quality customer services and offer meals and amenities
comparable to that of British Airways and Aer Lingus. The second strategy was to charge a single fare ticket of IВЈ98 on it Dublin–London service,
which was very low when compared to British Airways and Aer Lingus's rate of IВЈ208 or IВЈ99 if booked in advance.
Ryanair used the penetration pricing strategy, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This reaction of Ryanair's competitors will be discussed more lately in this paper. Given that Ryanair is a new airline, chances of survival will be slim
if they engage in a price war.
If all is in favor of Ryanair, they will be able to acquire a sizeable portion of its competitor's market share for that route, as well as acquire new
customers from other transport options such as trains and ferries, by offering a faster commute. To compare the price with competitors and consider
this opportunity for Ryanair's service between Dublin and London, Ryanair should estimate the cost and the possibility of seats sold by using British
Airways revenue and cost in exhibit 4 of the case study.
From the exhibit 4, Ryanair can calculate the possibility of seats sold by finding the ratio of customers who do not book the seat of British Airways in
advance and compare to its own seats available annually. The British Airways average revenue per passenger equals to IВЈ166.5. Also, British Airways
is selling its ticket at the price of IВЈ208, and IВЈ99 for early advance booking. Therefore, only around 38.07% of British Airways' customers bought
the seat in advance, while the rest, 61.93%, paid for full amount of IВЈ208. That means the round–trip passengers around 309,633 persons out of a half
million paid at the price of IВЈ208. On the other hand, Ryanair would run only four

Glitzz: Devising a Pricing Strategy
08
Fall
Marketing Individual Assignment 5
08
Fall
Marketing Individual Assignment 5
Glitzz: Devising a Pricing Strategy
1. What factors influence the pricing decisions for a product such as Glitzz? Analyze these factors and comment on the range of prices that can be set
for Glitzz.
Price is the amount of money given in exchange for the ownership or use of a good or service. Firms, like Glitzz need to consider the amount of
money that consumers are willing to give up in exchange for their products.
In making pricing decisions, firms, like Glitzz must first consider a few factors:
Company Factors
Pricing Objectives
Pricing Objectives involve specifying the role of price in an organization's marketing and strategic plans. These ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
* Competitors' Prices
Considering only the direct substitute products (i.e. Brilliant Restorer and Connoisseurs) in the market, the price of Brilliant Restorer was not stated.
Hence, the only price that can be compared with would be the price range of Connoisseurs, between $14.00 and $16.90.
Consumer Factors

Demand
* Availability of Substitutes
Glitzz faces direct competition of similar products from a few sellers, namely Brilliant Restorer and Connoisseurs.
Brilliant Restorer bears the most similarities to Glitzz and both cleansers come in the form of sprays. Connoisseurs differ in the method of application,
as it comes in the form of a brush and tray.
Powervescent is not considered as a direct existing competitor in the market as its shop is yet to be set up. In addition, it intends to sell via its future e
shop, which targets a different consumer group as Glitzz.
At the current stage, the jewelry cleaning machines also target a different consumer group, as compared to Glitzz.
Hence, Glitzz should focus on capturing customers from Brilliant Restorer and Connoisseurs, using them as a benchmark for price and product features.
Price Elasticity of Demand (Ep)
Price Elasticity of Demand is the percentage change in quantity demanded relative to a percentage change in price.
Ep = Percentage change in quantity demanded / Percentage change in price
However, as Glitzz is still a new

Free Radical Research Paper
We hear the term all the time, but what exactly is a free radical? Let's answer that by taking a look at the following scenario: You wake up one
morning, after hitting the snooze button a few times, and scramble around getting ready for work. You CAN'T be late today because you have an
important presentation and you have to go in early to set up. You grab your wallet and keys and head out to the driveway only to discover...
Someone has stolen your front left tire! You can't possibly drive to work on three tires, you need to full sets. Desperate, you steal your neighbors'
front left tire, throw it on and off your go. In a half hour when your neighbor comes out and discovers her tire gone, she steals a tire from the
neighbor's car across the street,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When unstable atoms steal electrons, the steal from the first "thing" they bump into. So if they bump into something important like a protein or
enzyme, it turns something good and necessary into something not so good. Over time this process causes major damage throughout the body.
Now here's where it gets complicated, a majority of the free radicals currently swimming around in your body right now are created by your own
metabolism, which means as harmful as they are, they are a completely unavoidable byproduct of life. Our bodies actually create free radicals just
by breathing and digesting food. As we age, the creation of free radicals accelerates as the basic mechanics of our metabolism are themselves
damaged by the free radicals they have created. Talk about a vicious cycle! And all of this free radical activity is what causes our bodies to age and
become diseased. When we're young, our cells have a very strong defense system known as superoxide dismutase (SOD) that kicks free radical
butt. But as we get older, SOD doesn't work as well. Without SOD keeping the peace, the free radicals have a field day and wreak as much damage
as they possibly can causing our cells, and eventually us, to die. Free radicals have also been linked to a number of diseases such as cancer, dementia
and heart disease. Why Antioxidants are

The Great War As Total War
The Great War as Total War
Week 1 Assignment
By: John Moore
When World War I was initially called "The Great War" by the people of those times, great did not mean good. Great was the word used to show the
magnitude of the war. The war was massive. It was gigantic in terms of the impact it had on literally the entire world. Only later in time would the
event become known as World War I.
Tensions between countries had been building across Europe. Many people thought war was inevitable. There was propaganda all over European
countries that helped to instigate the rise of tensions. Some nations were just looking for a reason to attack other countries. People were happy
when the war first began. It was predicted to be a quick war. Things did not go according to plan as the war lasted five years. When peace was finally
reached in November of 1918, the war had gone on a lot longer than originally anticipated.
There are many reasons why it was so absorbing and could be classified as a "total war". Countries and nations all across the world would become
involved before it end. There were countries fighting from Europe, Asia, Africa, North and South America. Thirty five nations in all would send troops
to fight. No other war before this time had involved this many different continents.
Another reason why it was total war was that millions of men and women died fighting for their country. More lives were lost than all of the previous
wars combined. Estimates show that around 10

Total War Dbq
Was World War I a total war?i think it was.A total war is when a nation dumps all resources and moresome into the war effort.During World War I most
nations was doing this and ignoring other things.This war was a total war because all focus was on the war creating or stunting military,economic,and
social/cultural growth.
World War Icaused growth in the military. In DBQ source 7 it shows a military airplane.This was a advancement, and if they wasn't focusing on the war
they wouldn't have to create this plane. In DBQ source 8 it show a Canadian tank and soldiers at the eastern front. I saw how they needed soldiers to
fight causing the influx of new recruitments.this also contributed to the growth of the military.DBQ source 3 caused the same thing.in DBQ source 6 it
tells how bad a soldier's life is.this stunted the military growth because they was fighting less efficience. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In DBQ source 4 its shows Village of Esnes before and after the war.After the war it was completely destroyed. This stunted economic growth it
going to cost to repair the village. In DBQ source 1 it shows the personal thoughts of a canadian expeditionist on the western front. he tells us how
many soldiers died and more has been wounded.this stunted economic growth because the wounded was using more supplies. In DBQ source 5 it
shows the daily life of people in belgium.it tells us how people barely have clothes and how people was guarding their food. This shows they had food
shortages and no stores meaning that their economic structure was

Should Civilians Be Killed In Total War Essay
Civilians, by name, should not have to suffer the effects of total war and should not be targeted in total war. This, however, is a fanciful myth. If this
myth was true, then nearly one half of the deaths in WWI should have been avoided. Millions more people should be alive. Just because people are
civilians doesn't mean that they are immune to the effects of total war. If anything, civilians are legitimate targets in total war, to be killed to cripple
nations and end bloodshed. Civilians can be targeted because they are a resource, they are on and actively supporting a hostile country, and, quite
frankly, civilians don't exist any more
One of the major reasons that civilians can be targeted in total war, is that they are resources, and resources are targeted and destroyed in total ... Show
Civilians are no longer safe in their homes as their soldiers get killed. With weapons of mass destruction available for use by almost any country,
anyone is vulnerable at any time. Many weapons are uncontrollable and the reason to have them is to kill civilians. If the world didn't want these
weapons of mass destruction around, if they didn't view civilians as a legitimate target, then why do we still have nuclear bombs, bioweapons, and
chemical weapon?
All civilians are a part of the "opposite team." Like sports fans, civilians support their countries with money, new players or soldiers, goods, and
workers. Like fans of the opposite team, they can be jeered at and mocked. However, as this would be war, you can add killed to that list.
This "right" to be killed stems from the fact that all civilians are possible militants. Even the great warriors of the ancient world, the Romans, realized
this. The Romans demonstrated this because, "When the Romans finally won the Punic wars, they put Carthage to the sword and killed everyone in
the city" (USS Clueless). The Romans and Carthaginians were bitter

The Term ' Total War '
The comprehension of the term 'total war' has had great significance towards the understanding as to how wars are fought, affect society and differ
from other conflicts. The main issue that arises is conclusively defining total war and is continually differing between both historians and military
combatants alike. Roger Chickering defines states "total war is distinguished by its intensity and extent. Theatres of operation span the globe; the
scale of the battle is practically limitless" all the while adding "total war requires the mobilisation not only of armed forced but also of whole
populations" This definition, while not quintessential is a good starting point for a definition due to its broadness and acceptance of the idea of the
incapability to fully mobilise a society's entire resource. David A. Bell states that it is often defined as 'a war involving the complete mobilization of a
society's resources to achieve the absolute destruction of an enemy, with all distinction erased between combatants and non–combatants' . However, he
notes the limitations of such an idea including the inability for societies to meet such criterion, in particular, the ability for a society to completely
utilise its resources towards the war effort. Ultimately, Jeremey black, while not giving a conclusive definition for the term, total war, does
acknowledge different definitions by various individuals distilling many of their arguments and consequently outlining main characteristics of

Signing Contracts With Labors Before Expelling Illegal...
Signing contracts with labors before expelling illegal immigrants to save the labor costs. Purchasing forward contract to lock the price of materials in
case of imposing tariff on importation. Taking loan in foreign countries with lower interest rate and purchasing currency future to avoid the exchange
rate fluctuation.
Introduction
As a quickly growing global manufacturing company, we are facing various and potential opportunities and challenges within the global market.
Manufacturing remains a crucial position of accelerating economics in both developing and developed counties. The 2007 financial recession choked
off the demand and numerous workers transferred to service industry. Due to the variable costs and capital loss, the majority of the business are
occupied by the first tier of manufacturing nations. Recently, Donald Trump was elected as the president of the United States. Our society will
encounter some turbulence from different aspects when he executes his proposals. The decisions he made on both financial field and manufacturing
industry will impact our future strategy, so we need to prepare ahead of time to hedge some possible risk.
Employment
Even though accelerating the development of manufacturing plays a significant role in Donald Trump's plan called "make American great again". His
judgements are not wise enough which would drive the situation worse. He proclaimed to expel illegal immigrants because he insisted that decision
will bring jobs back to

Was World War I a Total War? Essay
Was World War One a total war? Why? Why not?
The First World War of 1914–1918, also known as the Great War, was the first total war in history. What began as a European struggle over the
balance of power between the triple alliance of France, Britain and Russia on one side and the central powers of Germany and Austria–Hungary on the
other, soon became a global conflict that involved the imperial powers of Europe, their colonies and lands such as the Ottoman Empire, Japan and the
United States. Although the sheer number of countries involved in the conflict is enough to describe the First World War as a mass war, what makes it
total is the fact that it was waged not only against the enemy's armies, but also against the civilian ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The use of propaganda and the war of words between belligerents played a big part in making the First World War total, as "the orgy of killing on
the battlefield took place against the backdrop of an orgy of loaded words." The government and press were able to manipulate public opinion during
the war using words as tools to inspire national spirit, breed hatred, sacrifice, courage and endurance. Such propaganda included posters asking people
to "Wake up America! Civilisation calls every man, woman and child!" A British poster that emphasises the involvement of the total population in the
war effort shows different kinds of people engaging in war responsibilities В– men at battle, women in the workforce making uniforms, men making
weapons В– and it asks "Are YOU in this?" This kind of all–embracing propaganda had the aim to brainwash whole nations. The combination of the
public's thirst for information about the war and various governments' urgent need to mobilise entire civilian populations for the war effort led to a
moulding of the public's thinking through the printed word. In Germany, for example, the military had the right to censor the press and any
information that could distress the people was suppressed, while unfavourable news about a situation on the front was passed over silence, delayed or
toned down. This was the same in Britain and France. The First World War was total because propaganda and censored news were

Paradoxical Trinity Analysis
The age of the robot warrior machine is looming, and it represents monumental changes in the future conduct of war. Increased precision and decreased
risk make the automation of warriors both politically and militarily attractive. In the future, government and military leaders will have to address the
numerous moral and ethical questions concerning when, where and how to utilize these lifeless soldiers. In the past, many leaders relied on the
military theory from the Prussian theorist Carl Von Clausewitz' book "On War" to answer similar questions. Even though his theories have formerly
provided guidance, can the ideas written in the 1800's, truly be useful when applied to such drastic changes in the future conduct of war.
Clausewitz military ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Measuring, comparing, or correlating the ever–changing interaction between them is impossible. The only constant is that all three are always in
existence, pulling and pushing for an assemblance of equilibrium. Any attempt to ignore one of them or limit another would render them useless . The
trinity and the absolute existence of the three elements represent the unique unchanging nature of war. The enduring nature and profoundness suggests
that the Holy Trinity (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) may have influenced Clausewitz, which is undoubtedly also a bias of this author. Many scholars have
argued over its interpretation, especially with regard to the secondary trinity referenced by Clausewitz as the people, the commander with his army, and
the government . One notion that is agreeable to this author is that the secondary trinity of the people, army, and government was Clausewitz' attempt
at the application of the theory. The application in this way also discards the argument that the term 'war' can only apply a state. Because of this, the
elements of his paradoxical trinity can be applied not only to state actors, but to non–state, warlords, gangs, fanatical groups or even individuals. The
only requirement is humans. Other Students of Clausewitz have developed their own simplified interpretations of the

Why We Called Total War
The assassination brought many countries involved. WW I thus erupted in 1914. Every people of Europe got involved, helping their country to win
the war. Many new advanced weapons were created during WWI. Air plans, poison gas, throwers, machine guns, armored tanks, and submarines were
used in war. WWI also had created political chaos, leading to the society in many changes. The Great War, it is so
–called total war. The reason why it
called total war is because the war involved many nations, and also, every civilian were involved, too. Due to the eruption of the Great War is the first
war, it impacted many European countries, immediately (prewar and postwar), and especially the two opposing alliances: Austria–Hungary, Germany,
and the Ottoman Empire... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Working in factories, driving big trunks or ambulances, and others joins the front lines to help injured soldiers. Since this war engulfed many nations,
they confronted the impact of food shortages. Most soldiers had endured with starvation. Meanwhile other workers and peasants endured low wages
that could barely buy food because of the black market. The deterioration kept rising, and soldiers were starting to be embittered and so the civilians,
too. Eventually, the oppressive of resentful led to rebellions that Europe falls into turmoil. In 1919–1920, the Peace of Paris, the series of treaties was
assigned. Despite this war ends quite baffling, the impact was tremendous. The war had changed the social order, the treaties separated countries and
created new countries, and because of the First War, "war furthered the development of mass society" meaning that "it leveled social
classes...standardized political thinking through wartime propaganda, and extended many political rights to women" (textbook 4th Ed, pg 869).
Regarding WWI brought new techniques, not only things such as, radio transmission, cinema, and air transport, but also artificial arms and weapons
were introduced. However, besides all

Economics : Economics Of Business
HND Accounting
Economics
FINAL REPORT:
The Economics of Business
DUE DATE: 20 May 2015
Catherine Macintosh
11006620
For the attention of Sarah Sutherland
Word count: 1,243 (Excluding Acknowledgements, Abstract/Executive Summary, Terms of Reference, References & Appendices
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
1.0 Costs3
1.1 Total costs3
1.2 Average costs3
1.3 Marginal costs4
2.0 Games Console Market4
2.1 Oligopoly4
2.2 Oligopoly market structure4
2.3 Companies behaviour under oligopoly conditions5

3.0 An Alternative Market... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
CostsATC
AVC
AFC
Minimum level Productivity
In the short run, the average total cost will decrease initially as Sony begins manufacturing their new controller, due to the modification in the amount of
total product increasing for each following unit of variable input. This will continue until reaching the minimum level and will then start to increase.
This is due to the modification in the amount of total product decreasing for each following unit of variable input and as the number of employee's
increase the amount of total product for each additional employee will decrease more than the amount of total product for the previous employee. This
begins altering the marginal cost so consequently the average variable and total cost.
1.3Marginal Costs
Marginal costs are the amount that the total cost will alter for Sony by manufacturing one additional unit of productivity. Marginal costs are generated
by variable costs only. The law of diminishing infers that Sony's marginal cost will increase as productivity increases. Sony's increasing

total war Essay
"[B]oth sides had seen, in a sad scrawl of broken earth and murdered men, the answer to the question....Neither race had won, nor could win, the War.
The War had won, and would go on winning."1 These are the words of Edmund Blunden, a British soldier who survived the Battle of the Somme, who
came to the realization that nobody could claim victory in the twentieth–century mass warfare, because both winners and losers paid a high price. The
new type of warfare launched in the twentieth–century had a great impact on the modern world that went beyond the immediate cost of casualties.2
The psychological, social, economic and technological effect these wars had on those who survived earned this type of conflict a new name: total war,
which... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They did not have the strength or will to believe in themselves anymore. They also doubted that life would ever return to normal, as it had been
before the war. The Western society entered an age of darkness and pessimism. Many intellectuals even began to doubt the future of civilization.
Increasing numbers of thinkers and writers expressed their somber views about the new reality of life. Paul ValГ©ry argued that "the best of life
is behind us, that fullness is behind us, but disarray and doubt are in us and with us."8 People didn't know what to expect anymore. Great numbers
of men and women were anxious about what the future held for them. Many feared that another war would break out. ValГ©ry states that "The
storm has just ended, and yet we are as disquieted, as anxious, as if the storm were still to break upon us.... We do not know what will come forth:
still we can reasonably fear it."9 The storm in this case was the war which left people in such a shock that they looked upon the future with great
apprehension and uneasiness. The soldiers that served in the war were hit especially hard by the horror of war. Erich Maria Remarque, a German
soldier vividly portrays the carnage of World War II: "We have become wild beasts.... [and] crouching like cats we run on, overwhelmed by this wave
that bears us along, that fills us with ferocity, turning us into thugs, into

Total War Research Paper
Total war is a government's mobilisation of all its resources to support the efforts of its own troops and undermine those of its opponents. The
British empire was in a state of total war after the euphoric atmosphere of going to war to fight for King and Country had died down. This resulted in
the Defence of the Realm Act, known as DORA where all civilians were expected to contribute to the war effort. A historians studying the impact of
the war on the homefront, would find sources 12.10 and 12.14 of use, because these sources demonstrate how Britain was in a state of total war, how
desperate the government was to keep the soldiers at the front lines and how WWI ultimately altered the lives of many civilians. Source 12.10
demonstrates total

The Battle Of The Se Sherman's Total War Strategy
The March to the Sea: Sherman's Total War Strategy to Save the Union Depending on geography, William T Sherman has gone down in the annuals of
history as either one of the most hated or most respected generals of the Civil War. Through his March to the Sea, he became the first general in the
nineteenth century to use total war against an opponent. He knew civilian anger was inescapable in wars and decided to not only use the outrage for
the best military outcome, but also for the psychological and emotional effect. Therefore, the March to the Sea not only left behind in its wake a
demoralized and defeated people, but also introduced a new war strategy, which would save the nation. After his assignment to the southern states as a
young military officer Sherman's exposure to the secessionist movement helped him to understand the Southerner's will to fight against the North. This
assignment also provided Sherman with the complete knowledge of major Southern strongholds. Sherman even warned President Lincoln not to
underestimate the will of the South and to his disappointment; Sherman felt the administration failed to take the threat Southern secession seriously and
did not make the proper preparations to deal with it. When devising his plan for The March to the Sea, Sherman knew that he not only must capture
military targets, but also hurt the South psychologically as to break the will of the Southern people. Sherman's plan involved less combat and
concentrated more on the

Accounting Managerial Solution Chapter 2A
Appendix 2A
Least–Squares Regression Computations
Exercise 2A–1 (20 minutes) 1.
Month
Rental
Returns
(X)
Car Wash Costs (Y)
January
2,310
$10,113
February
2,453
$12,691
March
2,641
$10,905
April
2,874
$12,949
May
3,540

$15,334
June
4,861
$21,455
July
5,432
$21,270
August
5,268
$19,930
September
4,628
$21,860
October
3,720
$18,383
November
2,106
$9,830
December
2,495
$11,081
The least–squares regression results are as follows:
Intercept (fixed cost)
$2,296

Slope (variable cost per unit)
$3.74
R2
0.92
Therefore, the cost formula is $2,296 per month plus $3.74 per rental return or:
Y = $2,296 + $3.74X
Note that the R2 is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
a.
Quarter
DLHs
(X)
Utilities Cost (Y)
Year 1:
1st
5,000
$50,000
2nd
3,000
$45,000
3rd
4,000
$60,000
4th
6,000
$75,000
Year 2:

1st
10,000
$100,000
2nd
9,000
$105,000
3rd
8,000
$85,000
4th
11,000
$120,000
The least–squares regression results are as follows:
Intercept (fixed cost)
$17,000
Slope (variable cost per unit)
$9.00
R2
0.93
Therefore, the cost formula using direct labor–hours as the activity base is $17,000 per quarter plus $9.00 per direct labor–hour, or
Y = $17,000 + $9.00X.
Note that the R2 is 0.93, which means that 93% of the variation in utility costs is explained by the number of direct labor–hours. This is a very high R2
and is an indication of a good fit.
Problem 2A–4 (continued) b.The scattergraph plot of utility costs versus direct labor–hours appears below:

3.The company should probably use direct labor–hours as the activity base, since the fit of the regression line to the data is much tighter than it is with
tons mined. The R2 for the regression using direct labor–hours as the activity base is twice as large as for the regression using tons mined as the
activity base. However, managers should look more closely at the costs and try to determine why utilities costs are more closely tied to direct
labor–hours than to the number of tons mined.
CASE

How Does Total War Affect Society

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Karen Nelson

More from Karen Nelson (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How Does Total War Affect Society