Value-Based Purchasing Presentation - Rubric Value-Based Care 16 points Criteria Description Value-Based Care 5. Target 16 points The presentation explains value-based care in a substantial and thought-provoking manner. 4. Acceptable 14.72 points The presentation explains value-based care in a substantial manner. 3. Approaching 14.08 points The presentation clearly explains value-based care. 2. Insufficient 12.8 points The presentation vaguely explains value-based care. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The presentation does not sufficiently explain value-based care. Di�erences in Value-Based Care 16 points Criteria Description Differences in Value-Based Care 5. Target 16 points The presentation explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach in a substantial and thought-provoking manner. 4. Acceptable 14.72 points The presentation explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service or a capitated approach in a substantial manner. 3. Approaching 14.08 points Collapse All The presentation clearly explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for- service or a capitated approach. 2. Insufficient 12.8 points The presentation vaguely explains how value-based care differs from a fee-for- service or a capitated approach. Financial Advantages to Value-Based Purchasing 16 points Criteria Description Financial Advantages to Value-Based Purchasing 5. Target 16 points The presentation thoroughly and substantially describes why adopting a value- based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan. 4. Acceptable 14.72 points The presentation thoroughly describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan. 3. Approaching 14.08 points The presentation clearly describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan. 2. Insufficient 12.8 points The presentation vaguely describes why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and to the health plan. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Presentation of Content 8 points Criteria Description Presentation of Content 5. Target 8 points The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. 4. Acceptable 7.36 points The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. 3. Approaching 7.04 points The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships t.

1. Value-Based Purchasing Presentation - Rubric
Value-Based Care 16 points
Criteria Description
Value-Based Care
5. Target 16 points
The presentation explains value-based care in a substantial and
thought-provoking
manner.
4. Acceptable 14.72 points
The presentation explains value-based care in a substantial
manner.
3. Approaching 14.08 points
The presentation clearly explains value-based care.
2. Insufficient 12.8 points
The presentation vaguely explains value-based care.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The presentation does not sufficiently explain value-based care.

2. Di�erences in Value-Based Care 16 points
Criteria Description
Differences in Value-Based Care
5. Target 16 points
The presentation explains how value-based care differs from a
fee-for-service or a
capitated approach in a substantial and thought-provoking
manner.
4. Acceptable 14.72 points
The presentation explains how value-based care differs from a
fee-for-service or a
capitated approach in a substantial manner.
3. Approaching 14.08 points
Collapse All
The presentation clearly explains how value-based care differs
from a fee-for-
service or a capitated approach.
2. Insufficient 12.8 points
The presentation vaguely explains how value-based care differs
from a fee-for-

3. service or a capitated approach.
Financial Advantages to Value-Based Purchasing 16 points
Criteria Description
Financial Advantages to Value-Based Purchasing
5. Target 16 points
The presentation thoroughly and substantially describes why
adopting a value-
based purchasing arrangement would be financially
advantageous for the physician
groups and to the health plan.
4. Acceptable 14.72 points
The presentation thoroughly describes why adopting a value-
based purchasing
arrangement would be financially advantageous for the
physician groups and to the
health plan.
3. Approaching 14.08 points
The presentation clearly describes why adopting a value-based
purchasing
arrangement would be financially advantageous for the
physician groups and to the

4. health plan.
2. Insufficient 12.8 points
The presentation vaguely describes why adopting a value-based
purchasing
arrangement would be financially advantageous for the
physician groups and to the
health plan.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Presentation of Content 8 points
Criteria Description
Presentation of Content
5. Target 8 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally
progress and relate to
each other. The project includes motivating questions and
advanced organizers.
The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable 7.36 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and

5. supporting
information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.
Includes persuasive
information from reliable sources.
3. Approaching 7.04 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may
show some
inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each
other.
2. Insufficient 6.4 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not
create a strong
sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of
information Includes
Layout 8 points
Criteria Description
Layout
5. Target 8 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall

6. message with
appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text
is appropriate in
length for the target audience and to the point. The background
and colors enhance
the readability of the text.
4. Acceptable 7.36 points
The layout background and text complement each other and
enable the content to
be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies
appropriately for
headings and text.
3. Approaching 7.04 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the
fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts,
italics, bold, long
paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not
enhance readability.
2. Insufficient 6.4 points
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy

7. or distracting
with large gaps of white space or a distracting background.
Overall readability is
difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts,
dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations
of text.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Language Use and Audience Awareness 8 points
Criteria Description
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence
construction, word choice,
etc.)
5. Target 8 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word
choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to
purpose, discipline,
and scope.
4. Acceptable 7.36 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for

8. the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to
communicate clearly.
3. Approaching 7.04 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most
part.
2. Insufficient 6.4 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
or word choice are
present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using
figures of speech
appropriately.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Mechanics of Writing 4 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
language use)
5. Target 4 points
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic
English.
4. Acceptable 3.68 points

9. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present.
3. Approaching 3.52 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not
overly distracting to
the reader.
2. Insufficient 3.2 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Documentation of Sources 4 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references,
bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Target 4 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. Acceptable 3.68 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,

10. and format is
mostly correct.
3. Approaching 3.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. Insufficient 3.2 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Total 80 points
Week 6 Assignment Template
Client Presentation on Globalization
Part 2: Economic Effects of Globalization
[Your Name Here]
Walden University
International Trade: 1 of […]
[How does international trade affect Fourevr, both domestically
and in international markets? 2–3 slides]

11. [Insert speaker's notes (approximately 1 paragraph per slide for
this question). Delete all information in brackets.]
International Trade: 2 of […]
[Continue from the previous slide.]
[Update the Title with the total number of slides for this
question.]
[Add an additional slide if necessary. If a third slide is added,
update its title to reflect “3 of 3.”]
[Insert speaker's notes (approximately 1 paragraph per slide for
this question). Delete all information in brackets.]
Trade Policies
[How can existing or potential changes in trade policies affect
Fourevr’s operations? (1–2 slides)]
[Add an additional slide if necessary. If a second slide is added,
update the titles in both to reflect “1 of 2” and “2 of 2.”]

12. [Insert speaker's notes (approximately 1 paragraph per slide for
this question). Delete all information in brackets.]
Outsourcing: 1 of 2
[Does it make sense for Fourevr to outsource or offshore the
production of any of its inputs or any of its operations? Why or
why not? (2 slides)]
[Insert speaker’s notes (approximately 1 paragraph per slide for
this question). Delete all information in brackets.]
Outsourcing: 2 of 2
[Continue from the previous slide.]
[Insert speaker's notes (approximately 1 paragraph per slide for
this question). Delete all information in brackets.]
The Effects of Globalization: 1 of […]
[In what other ways might globalization affect Fourevr, both
positively and negatively? In your response, consider the effects
on Fourevr’s prices, output, and profits. (2–3 slides)]

13. [Insert speaker's notes (approximately 1 paragraph per slide for
this question). Delete all information in brackets.]
The Effects of Globalization: 2 of […]
[Continue from the previous slide.]
[Update the Title with the total number of slides for this
question.]
[Add an additional third slide if necessary. If a third slide is
added, update its title to reflect “3 of 3.”]
[Insert speaker's notes (approximately 1 paragraph per slide for
this question). Delete all information in brackets.]
Globalization Strategies
[What can Fourevr do to better position itself to benefit, or
protect itself, from globalization? (1–2 slides)]
[Add an additional slide if necessary. If a second slide is added,
update the titles in both to reflect “1 of 2” and “2 of 2.”]

14. [Insert speaker's notes (approximately 1 paragraph per slide for
this question). Delete all information in brackets.]
References
[Include a reference list at the end of your presentation, just as
you would in a paper. Reference list entries take the same
format they would in a paper:
Jones, P. (2004). This great book. New York, NY: Publisher.
Smith, W., & Cat, D. (2010). How to make a good presentation
great. Presentations Quarterly, 45(4), 56–59.
doi:10.123.45/abc]
[Speaker's notes are not needed on this page. Delete all
information in brackets.]
image1.png
image3.png
image2.png
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Scenario: You work for the contracting department for a
national payer that is working to convert its provider contracts
to value-based arrangements. Your team is approaching large
physician groups for recontracting. Develop a 12-15-slide
presentation with speaker notes to show the value of converting

15. to a value-based arrangement:
1. Explain value-based care.
2. Explain how value-based care differs from a fee-for-service
or a capitated approach.
3. Describe why adopting a value-based purchasing arrangement
would be financially advantageous for the physician groups and
to the health plan.
Include at least three references, including your textbook.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A
link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in
Class Resources if you need assistance.