The document discusses an evaluation of a documentary, asking questions about various technical elements like the mise-en-scene, choice of music, editing, use of archive footage, handheld camerawork, title, lighting, dialogue and areas for potential improvement. Respondents answered yes or no questions and provided short comments on elements like the suitability of the setting, how the mise-en-scene could have been more suitable, and suggestions for improved camera angles, more interviews and clearer sound.

1. Evaluation of documentary

2. What did you like about the mise-en-
scene?
• “I think the setting was relevant”
• “It was suitable that they were
students”

3. Did the choice of music interest
you?
yes no

4. How could the mise-en-scene have been
more suitable to the documentary?
• “by making a clearer message to the
viewer and do more than just one
interview”
• “could've had people on their phone in the
background”

5. Did the editing appear smooth and
seemless?
yes no

6. Did you feel that the archive footage
used was suitable to the documentary?
yes no

7. Did the utility of the handheld camera at the
beginning of the documentary encourage a
realistic feel?
yes no

8. Did you think the title was
relevant and informative?
yes no

9. Was the lighting appropriate?
yes no

10. Was the dialogue clear and coherent?
yes no

11. What do you think could have been
improved in the documentary?
• “Alternative camera angles, more cutaways,
more content as there is only one interview.
Sound needs to be more audible and clearer”
• “Improved editing techniques, for example
cutaways, zoom etc”