1. Technical Qualities
Similarities
• Both speak in an informal manner.
• Both speak politely and doesn’t
contain swearing.
• Both insert informative content
towards their audience.
Differences
• On the left can be seen and watched while
on the right only can be accessed by audio.
• On the left used props and costume to
make it more appealing while on the right
didn’t.
• On the right focuses on a different theme
than the one on the left.
2. Aesthetic Qualities
My overall work looks good, and it was
creative. It’s unique and different from others.
I would improve my work by making it can be
watched and more informative. I will use a
camera for my next project and prepared
more trivia questions and insights about the
film.
Strengths
• Creative
• Informative
• Unique
Weaknesses
• Can’t see the speakers faces
• Lack of information
• Lack of insights and opinions
from the speakers.
3. Audience Appeal
I have inserted information and
my own opinions about the
movie to make in appealing to
my audience.
I have inserted trivia
questions about the movie
and rate the movie out of
ten so that it will be
informative towards my
audience
5. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
• The movie that they were talking about is my favourite movie. I
like it when they talk about their opinions and information about
the movie.
• What improvements could have been made to the product?
• Talk a bit slower so the podcast will be longer.
6. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
• The talkers gave me their opinions and insights regarding the
movie and I value that the most.
• What improvements could have been made to the product?
• They should’ve added more trivia questions to make it more
appealing.
7. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
• The movie that they were talking about was very interesting and it
interests me more when they talked about their genuine opinions.
• What improvements could have been made to the product?
• They should’ve used a camera so I can see their expression.
8. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer feedback?
• I agreed that we should’ve used a camera to record our faces so
that the audience can see our facial expression.
• What do you disagree with from your peer feedback?
• I disagree that the podcast should’ve been longer. This is because
podcast shouldn’t last longer than 20 minutes because podcasts
suppose to be short and interesting.
9. Peer Feedback Summary
I would added a camera to record and capture our facial
expression during the recording. This is because, with
showing our facial expression the audience can relate and
feel comfortable looking at a human face during an
interaction. Moreover, it will also make our audience can
relate to the statement that were given in the podcast by
judging our facial expression such as smiling expression and
confused faces.
Editor's Notes
Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page alongside an existing product
Use text boxes and arrows
Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it?
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them
Use text boxes and arrows
How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience.
Refer to your findings from your questionnaire.
Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them
Use text boxes and arrows
What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?
