The Helms-Burton Act

The Helms-Burton Act
Comparatively, the issue of unilateral trade with Cuba has sparked major attention over the past two
decades. From Cuban cigars to sugar, few of the many exports from Cuba the United States does not
allow into the country. So does the United States import to Cuba? Surprisingly, yes and in fact the
United States has been, in the last decade, the number one country that imports goods to Cuba. The
Helms–Burton Act was enacted in the year 1996, which extended territorial application of the
Embargo to apply to foreign companies trading with Cuba; the act also penalized foreign companies
who were reportedly trafficking in the property of the United States citizens, but confiscated in Cuba
(Helms–Burton Act: Resurrecting the Iron Curtain). So yes,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Cuba Essay
Firstly, US changed its policy towards normalization with Cuba in order to make up for its economic
loss. As US has been putting economic sanctions on Cuba including bank restrictions, export
restriction and tourism for approximately sixty years (Harrell 2016, pp. 6–7), the development of
Cuba is entirely limited. However, US also suffers from not only a loss of the trade gain but also a
loss of commercial reputation which makes it unreliable in the world, said by US International Trade
Commission (2011). Therefore, Cuba is essential to the economic development of US. Beside, refer
to Nerurkar and Sullivan (2011), the United States Geological Survey estimates that there are 4.6
billion barrels of undiscovered technically recoverable crude ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As Harrell put it, "The United States has an interest in fostering inclusive economic growth in Cuba
and enabling US companies to take advantage of market opportunities in the country." If they can
carry out economic activities normally, there is no doubt that it is beneficial to US in various
aspects. Consequently, it is worthwhile for US to normalize the economic relationship with Cuba.
Secondly, US normalize the relationship with Cuba because of domestic political reason. Since there
is an increasing number of Cubans in US, as well as decreasing anti–Castroism of the young Cuban–
American generation, how to gain the political support of the immigrations become a noticeable
problem for US government. Refer to Pew Hispanic Center (2006), Florida is home to about
990,000 Cubans, which occupies two–thirds of Cubans (68%), and other states of large amount of
Cubans are New Jersey (81,000), New York (78,000), California (74,000) and Texas (34,000).
Besides, the huge population of Cuba–Americans have great enthusiasm and play an essential role
in the political stage of US, especially the young generation. As Pew Hispanic Center put it, over
half (52%) of them consider the US as their true motherland, thus they are willing to be involved in
the elections (2006 p. 12). As Lambrecht said, "Despite being a largely first–generation community,
they have one of the highest naturalization, voter registration and political participation rates of any
group arriving in the latter half

Cuban Embargo Analysis
It is after fifty five years of U.S. embargo that Presidents Barack Obama and Raul Castro announced
the reestablishment of diplomatic relationship between the United–States and Cuba. The embargo
had heavy consequences on the development of Cuba. According to Press (2011), the origin of this
stagnation is due to the U.S. embargo, the Cuban economy and the government's fear of freedom of
information. This situation particularly affected the development of the Internet in Cuba. In fact,
Cuba was leading the pre–Internet networking during the 1990's in the Caribbean and was even
ahead of the Soviet Union (Dye, Anton and Bruckman, 2016). However, they are nowadays behind
most countries in the world because of slow network speed and government's ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
International actors are nowadays on the Cuban scene to improve their accessibility to the world,
such as China which "pledge to provide assistance to Cuba to help its social economic development"
(as stated in Press,

Effects of U.S. Foreign Policy on Cuba
Britt Pendergrast
Dr. Cassell
AP Lang
4th period
Effects of U.S. Foreign Policy on Cuba
The foreign policy of the United States toward Cuba over the past fifty years has caused many
problems for the Cuban society and its people, and relations between the two nations have been at
odds for decades due to the harsh foreign policy stance of the United States toward Cuba. The
United States has considered Cuba as its enemy ever since July 1960 when Fidel Castro's new
revolutionary government changed everything. Castro seized privately owned land in Cuba,
nationalized several privately owned companies (most of which were subsidiaries of U.S.
businesses), and heavily taxed American products which led to U.S. exports being reduced greatly,
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, the U.S. banned trade with and travels to Cuba and considered all countries who do
engage in Cuban trade and travel to be an enemy to the U.S." (Arcelaschi 1). When the United
States learned of Cuba's communist affiliations they did not take time to analyze the situation and
quickly cut off all relations and access to the nation, which sent a message but did nothing to destroy
communism. Even after a course of several decades with the harsh isolationist policy in place,
Castro's communist regime is still firmly in power. The U.S. was too quick in its decision and
attempt to take out the communist government and took drastic measures by imposing a full
embargo to try to solve a problem that could have been solved in a much more effective and ethical
way.
The relatively short distance between Cuba and the U.S. naturally led to a long and involved history
of relations between the two nations, but relations between the two nations over the past fifty years
have been unhealthy and harmful to both nations. The embargo imposed by the U.S. has only been
damaging and unhelpful to the situation. "As a result of the new government's nationalization policy,
American investors suffered major losses and the U.S. retaliated in July 1960 by canceling planned
purchases of Cuban sugar" (Crouch 70). This was the first act of neglect toward Cuba that would
only quickly progress until all trade and relations were cut off with Cuba.

Fidel Castro Led The Cuban Revolution
Nearly fifty–five years ago, an embargo was placed on Cuba, halting all trade between the two
countries. Fidel Castro led the Cuban Revolution, which began in July of 1953, leading to their
victory and the previous leader, Fulgencio Batista, being driven out of his position. Castro had
gained a lot of support from Cuban citizens with his promises to restore political and civil liberties.
Castro later began to stray from these promises, starting by nationalizing American businesses
within Cuba and by presenting anti–American actions. In 1960, he began talks with the Soviet
Union and moved toward communism leading to America creating the embargo in 1961. The
embargo was put mainly put in place to contain the spread of communism to other South American
countries. The terms to lift the embargo included, the revocation of their communist ways and move
toward democracy, and to improve the freedom of the individuals whom live on the island. These
have both yet to have happened, yet fifty–four years later, the embargo is still firmly in place.
Lifting the embargo can fix issues related to the Cuban people, it can bring countless trade
opportunities, and it can push for positive changes in Cuba. Therefore, the United States should lift
the embargo on Cuba.
In light of the Cuban embargo, it is easy to see that it is hurting the citizens of Cuba. Cubans are
denied access to things we, in the United States, couldn't imagine living without. They don't have
access to modern technology,

Essay about The US Embargo on Cuba
The U.S. imposed an Embargo against Cuba on Oct. 19, 1960. Has the time come to the United
States to lift the five–decade embargo? The Embargo was a part of America's Cold War strategy
against the Soviet Union, imposed on the belief that Cuba was a threat to the U.S. since the Soviet
Union was a danger to the National Security because of its alliance with the Soviet Union. Although
Cuba would like the U.S to terminate the embargo against their country, the U.S. wants Cuba to
make their situation a better living environment and to promote human rights for its citizens before
any sanctions are removed. The Cuban Embargo, also known as "el bloqueo" to Cuban citizens, was
declared by the United States in 1960 to eliminate imports of Cuban ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Eisenhower instituted a ban on nearly all exports to Cuba, and then President Kennedy expanded
into a full economic embargo that included stringent travel restrictions. In 2000, President Bill
Clinton signed the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act, which allowed the U.S. to
send medicine and humanitarian supplies to the Cuban people. Independent Non–Governmental
Organizations (NGO), Catholic Churches around the nation, and an international organization
Pastors of Peace distributed the aid. According to IFCO/Pastors for Peace in 2011, a caravan cargo
of nearly 100 tons of humanitarian aid arrived in Cuba at the 20 anniversary (Caravan).
U.S. wanted Cuba to meet special requirements in order for the embargo to go into effect, including
rules such as: transition to a democracy, demand Havana support small businesses in exchange for
sheathing restrictions on remittances, denounce presence of either Fidel or Raul Castro in Cuban
government, better living conditions for all Cuban citizens, absolutely no travel to Cuba, and
promote human rights. Cuba has not yet met all requirements, but is currently working on them.
Obama reversed some of these polices, such as, allowing U.S. citizens to send remittances to non–
family members in Cuba and travel under license of religious or educational purposes. As of today
United States citizens may travel to Cuba with only special reasons like religious or

A Cold War Relic Essay
A Cold War Relic
Should the United States seek to tighten the economic grip on Cuba? If so, why?
In looking at the situation with common sense and practicality, a continued economic grip on Cuba,
and more importantly the Cuban people, is relatively useless without the cooperation from a large
number of other countries. It makes even less sense when you consider that the United States trades
with countries with similar political ideologies such as China and Vietnam, China now a part of the
World Trade Organization (WTO), gives continued proof that trade restrictions against Cuba are
antiquated. (Daniels, Radebaugh & Sullivan, 2015).
While U.S. trade restrictions can be argued as appropriate given Cuba's history of human rights
violations, many other countries that the U.S. are not without fault in that arena. According to
Lamrani (2012), "if the United States applied these same criteria across the board (with regards to
human rights), they would not maintain relations with quite a number of other countries" (para. 28).
Ironically, when viewing at this embargo in reverse from a human rights perspective, the U.S. can be
viewed in the same negative light with this relationship, as the trade embargo is having a negative
effect on the overall well–being of the Cuban people, particularly with regards to health and
nutritional deficiencies, which have contributed to a rise in the incidence of disease in the country
(Hardcastle, n.d.). These economic sanctions continue to

Should the U.S. Government Drop Its Sanctions against Cuba?
After the Second World War sanctions emerge as a major foreign policy instruments of the powerful
nations. Globalization engendered the denunciation of the brute use of force as a primary method of
international coercion. Cuba is one of the countries considered as a rogue state by the United States
and its allies. The emergence of Cuba as a communist country in the western hemisphere in 1960,
and the nationalization of a huge amount of US assets in Cuba by the then new regime led to the
sanctions against Cuba. However, starting from the end of the 1980's the Communist block begin
falling apart. Cuba lost its international allies and became helpless both economically and politically
in the international seen, and it is no longer a threat ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The objectives of the sanctions transformed from containing communism to bringing freedom and
democracy to the people of Cuba.
Inconsistency underlies the logic of the United States sanctions against Cuba. The relevance of the
pre–1990 objectives of the embargo became obsolete with the end of the cold war. However, the so
called "Cuban Democracy Act" came up with a new objective of bringing freedom and democracy
to the people of Cuba. The act demands Cuba to establish electoral democracy. Put it in other words,
the act asks Cuba to permit the establishment of multi–party system, conduct periodic elections,
permit freedom of press, and build democratic institutions which guarantee the protection of the
human and democratic rights of the people. These objectives by themselves are noble ideas worth
fighting for and promoting all over the world. Yet, the problem with the "Cuban Democracy Act" is
it proposes to strengthen the economic sanctions against Cuba to bring about these ends. This
requirement levied upon Cuba contradicts the basis of the United States relations with other
countries around the world. Countries like China and Saudi Arabia don't have electoral democracy
whatsoever, moreover they are more brutal than the Castro regime in Cuba. However, they enjoy the
status of most favored nation in their relation with the United States (Griffin 171). Thus, the
question is what is the logical foundation for the

Policies On Cuba Essay
Policies on Cuba
In Juan Rulfo's novel, Pedro Paramo, the reader follows a dusty road to a town of death, where the
following is said ÓUp and down the hill we went, but always descending . We had left the hot wind
behind and were sinking into pure, airless heat. The stillness seem to be waiting for someone. ÔIt's
hot here Ô I said ÔYou might say, but this is nothing'. My companion relied. ÔTry to take it easy.
You'll feel it even more when we get to Comala. That town sits on the coals of the Earth, at the very
mouth of Hell. They say that when people from there die and go to Hell, they come back for
blankets.'Ó
This was the view many Americans had of Cuba in the late fifties and sixties. Cuba was seen as ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Cuba and the Soviet Union started a relationship in which Cuba benefited the most.
Like many relationships, Cuba's and the Soviet Union's ended after thirty years of Cold War with the
collapse of the Soviet Union, and the economic stability of Cuba. In 1991 as the Soviet Union
disappeared and the former
Eastern Bloc countries struggled for their own existence the future of Cuba once again was
questioned. Subsidies, favorable trade agreements, economic and military aid from these countries
disappeared.
In the early 90's Cuba lost their only major economic connection to the outside world. By 1992 the
total value of trade turnover (imports plus exports) with Eastern Bloc countries had been reduced to
7% of what it had been just 3 years previously. The price of its two major exports, sugar and nickel
had dropped 20 and 28 per cent, respectively, on the world market. At this time the
United States instead of offering Castro a dignified way out of Cuba's massive problems by
loosening the 30 year old trade embargo instead insisted on furthering tightening it with the 1992
Cuba Democracy Act. This act not only made it more difficult for American companies to deal with
Cuba but also set out to punish foreign companies that had dealings with the island nation.
As Communism fell in Europe and Asian Communist countries started to become a little more open
once again the death of Fidel Castro's Cuba was being predicted as the United States led another
attack on it's economic

The US Embargo on Cuba Essay
The US Embargo on Cuba
I. Introduction
In 1959, Cubareceived 74 percent of its imports from the US, and the US received 65 percentof
Cuba's exports. On February 3, 1962, the United States imposed a fulltrade embargo on Cuba,
completely ending any type of trade between the twocountries. This embargo remains in effect
today, more than four decades later,and has grown ! to be a huge center of debate and controversy
(DeVarona 8).Opponents to the embargo argue that the embargo does nothing more than hurt
theCuban people, while proponents argue that the embargo places pressure on Castroto repair Cuba's
mismanaged and corrupt government. Both the supportersand the opponents of this embargo have
strong arguments and evidence to supportthese ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Also, there isevidence that access to medical care by prisone! rs is intentionally withheldfrom
prisoners of conscience, and other prisoners that criticized the Cubangovernment. Amnesty
International reports that suspected critics of thegovernment are being harassed with threats,
eviction, loss of employment, andeven short–term incarceration. Even more disturbing is that these
violationsare merely a fraction of the true number of human rights breaches that theCuban
government is guilty of committing ("Amnesty International 2002Report"). But the human rights
violations are not the only reason actionneeded to be taken towards Cuba.
Another reason forimplementing the embargo on Cuba concerns the corrupt communist government
andUS hopes of promoting a transition to a democratic system. On February 3, 1962,President
Kennedy was confident that "Castro was moving toward theestablishment of a to! talitarian regime
in alliance with the Soviet Union"(DeVarona 7). This raised a huge national defense issue since
Cuba is only 90miles from US soil. The US government claims that the transition from
communismto democracy will help Cuba flourish, as other democratic countries in thewestern
hemisphere have. ("Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of1996").
Secondly, Cubaneeds to repair its corrupt, failing state–run economy. The reality of thisstruggling
economy is that Cuba's resources are plenty, and its

Cuban Embargo Research Paper
The Cuban embargo is a commercial, economic, and financial sanction placed by the United States
over fifty years ago due to multiple tensions between the U.S. and Cuba. Known locally as "el
bloqueo", the embargo ultimately restricts Cuba's access to medical information and supplies and
places their free health care system in a difficult position financially. Cuba also still has the same
repressive government it did years ago, in regards to the government are still abusing the civil and
political rights of its citizens. It is the moral obligation of the United States to promote political
change on the island and to attempt to undo the pain and suffering caused by the States. Thus it is
proposed that the Cuban embargo be lifted because it is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This outcome is a direct result of the Helms–Burton Act as it restricts other foreign countries to
assist Cuba with its medical situation. Cuban healthcare has been seriously undermined as the
"embargo has caused Cuba a loss of more than 200 million dollars in the medical sector alone"
(Xinhua). However, counter arguments to lifting the embargo for medical aid focus around the
phenomenon of medical tourism, " the facility would be overwhelmed by its foreign patients"
(Garrett). Yet, placement of the embargo is comparatively worse than engagement as Cuban citizens
currently have very little chance of experiencing the new generation of health care with the trading
sanction in place, the Cuban people and actors trying to help are being penalized due to the embargo
and the powerlessness the people have when facing the government. Any private donations made to
the public health cause must first go through the government where where its true amount and value
will be grossly reduced by taxes and fees on U.S. dollars, only then will it trickle down to its
originally intended owners. Much like failed U.S. embargos in the past, the embargo on the
undemocratized Cuban government only negatively affects the people as the government gains more
power and influences the only

Essay On Cuban Embargo
The Cuban Embargo The key to understanding the foreign policy of a nation state is understanding
that state's national interest. The key to successful foreign policy is, as Henry Kissinger stated in
1998, defining "an achievable objective". Thus United States policy towards
Cuba fails because it neglects these two key ingredients of foreign policy. The US embargo of Cuba
is four decades old and no longer serves the country's national interest, rather it has proven to be a
economic and political hindrance for the US. The embargo also falls short in terms of having an
achievable goal, since many of the requests that embargo legislation calls for are simply not within
the ability of the Cuban state. By examining the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Three years later when the economic sanctions of the Cuban
Democracy Act had failed to oust Castro from power, the US Congress once again increased the
standards Cuba most adhere to for the embargo to be lifted. It accomplished this by passing the
Helms–Burton Law. Three of the stated purposes of the helms–Burton Law focus on the
democratization of the Cuban government, two deal with protecting the US, and the last one is
concerned with global sanctions. The law also increases the amount of compensation Cuba most pay
before the US will drop the sanctions. The Helms–Burton law, by insisting that Cuba pay
compensation to over
400,000 Cuban Americans, makes it literally impossible for the Cuban state to reach the
US's terms. Embargo supporters claim that sanctions against Cuba must be maintained because
Cuba is still a national security threat to the US, however current facts about security reveal this to
simply be untrue. Initially, Castro's socialist platform and alliance with the Soviet Union did indeed
pose a threat to American security. The reason for this is that the state of international politics in that
era was one of bipolarism between liberalism and communism. This meant that the US felt that its
balance of power in its own hemisphere was being threatened by the Soviet's presence in Cuba. Also
the
Soviet's armament of Cuba posed a severe threat to US security, as was seen during the
Cuban missile crisis. However, with the fall of the

Fidel Castro Relationship
The first thing that comes to mind when you think of cigars, radical politics, social strife and Fidel
Castro is Cuba. Officially known as the Republic of Cuba, it is also known as the Pearl of the
Caribbean, a country isolated from the capitalist world. For the last 40 years Cuba has been under
the rule of the Castro regimen, a government who brought advances in education and healthcare,
brought electricity to the country side however, ruled with an iron fist when it came to dealing with
it's opposition. Castro jailed many of his political opponents, closed down opposition newspapers
and made no moves towards elections. Under his rule, the amount of land a person could own was
limited, he ended private businesses and controlled consumer goods. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Despite doubts about Castro's communist political ideology, the United States recognized his
government. However, as Castro's command increased trade with the Soviet Union, nationalized
U.S.– owned properties, and hiked taxes on American imports, the United States responded with
economic retaliation. After slashing Cuban sugar imports, imposing a ban on nearly all exports to
Cuba, and placing a full economic embargo that included strict travel

International Political Economy : Cuba 's Economic Sanction
Damilet Cepero INR3703 International Political Economy Professor Opsal Cuba's Economic
Sanction Final Paper Economic Sanctions are the interruption by one state imposed to another for
the purpose to command a specific demands by the state, such as political changes. The originator
states views the sanctions and the economic relationships it has with that country and the number of
states that will initiate the sanction. Different sanctions are placed on states due to the effectiveness
of the tool. Economic sanctions are a viewed as a political tool utilized as an alternative to armed
conflict or military interventions. Sanctions have been placed on states in order to change a political
or military behavior as a more peaceful measure to prevent war. These instruments are considered to
be controversial policy as they can damage the economy of another states. Historically states placed
under embargoes have suffered major economic downfalls and weakened the economic environment
to a atrocious manner that hurts the trade, citizens and businesses established in the state. Embargoes
are a way to impede the state from having any trade with the initiating state and placing a
commercial blockage on their economy. Embargoes are considered to be a strong diplomatic
measure to impose a effort in part from another country. They are seen as the enforcement of peace
to a state while other diplomatic efforts have failed by the initiating state. In order for

Negative Effects Of The Cuban Embargo
Throughout history sovereignty has been known to be at the mercy of a nation's ruler, king, or
dictator. As we have come to recognize, especially in the United States, sovereignty should
unconditionally belong to the people to freely determine their own destiny. For 58 years Cuba's
sovereignty has been firm, yet respected. A diverse nation and people, yet divided, where equal
rights and responsibilities are at odds due to their political views. (Peterson, 1991) A nation where
the government grants its people limited rights rather than the people granting their government
limited powers. For 55 years, it has been a nation that is granted limited opportunities due to an
imposed embargo; therefore, limiting opportunities to its people. (Leogrande, 2015) ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Economic rights are an integral component of human rights and the Cuban embargo in many ways
violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. "It bears mentioning that even economic
sanctions imposed multilaterally for "security" reasons must comply with legal standards that limit
the degree to which they may harm the human rights of innocent people." (Coli, 2007, p. 267)
Human rights are essential to humanity and the role to guarantee these rights is a fundamental role
of Cuba. However, because the embargo remains in place for 55 years for the sake of promoting
human rights, Coli (2007) argues the United States has a "special legal and moral obligation" (Coli,
2007, p. 199) to ensure the human rights of Cubans on the island are protected and the embargo does
not cause any further

Introduction The U.S. embargo against the exporting or importing of goods to Cuba is a complicated
governmental issue that has been in place for over 50 years. The Cold War began when hostile
relations existed between the U.S. and Russia; and began when Russia funneled money into Cuba in
which the U.S. reacted by dropping the purchase of sugar and Cuba retaliated by claiming oil
refineries (Daniels, Radebaugh, & Sullivan, 2015, p.252–253). Recently the U.S. administration has
begun lifting parts of the embargo in part as to develop better relations with Cuba and increase
Cuba's weakened economy. The ability for Cuba and entrepreneurs to import and export goods in
and out of Cuba will increase their economy and the resident's standard of living.
6–3 Should the United States seek to tighten the economic grip on Cuba? Is so, why? The U.S.
embargo is not being supported by the rest of the world and therefore the U.S. has very little
economic grip on Cuba. The members of World Trade Organizations (WTO) are not supporting ...
political system has influenced all of the trade embargo sanctions and alleviations over the last 50
years. The WTO is requesting the U.S. ease up on the trade embargo because it is hurting the Cuban
economy and people. There are supporters in the U.S House of Representatives and Senate that are
calling for the embargo to stay resilient, while others want the trade restrictions removed.
Corporations are wanting to trade with Cuba for increased profits. The United Nations voted against
the U.S. embargo with a vote of 188 to 3 against (Daniels, Radebaugh, & Sullivan, 2015, p.253). By
repealing the embargo the U.S. would benefit from the trade and Cuba would be able to stabilize
their economy which would result in more trade and less humanitarian relief. However to lift the
embargo I am afraid that the Cuban government would not change and the profits and import of
goods would benefit the government regime only and not the

Embargo on Cuba
Embargo on Cuba The U.S. imposed an Embargo on Cuba on Oct. 19, 1960. Has the time come for
the United States to lift the 5–decade embargo? The Embargo on Cuba was a part of America's Cold
War strategy against the Soviet Union, imposed on the basis that Cuba was a threat to the U.S.
National Security because of their alliance with the Soviet Union. Although Cuba would like the
U.S to terminate the embargo against their country, the U.S. wants Cuba to make their situation a
better living environment and to promote human rights for its citizens. The Cuban Embargo, also
known as "el bloqueo" to Cuban citizens, was declared by the United States in 1960 to eliminate
imports of Cuban goods. When the embargo was first set, it was only to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Raul Castro has gradually implanted major economic reforms and lifted travel restrictions, which
will help the country strengthen its international position. Because of Raul making huge changes for
Cuba, the island has let in allowing Cubans to buy or sell property, expand consumer goods such as,
DVD players, microwaves, cell phones and internet service. These small but large changes for Cuba,
that Raul changed, is making a huge impact on the isolated island. Now, because of Raul's changes,
the U.S. talks with Cuban officials every 6 months to see how everything is playing out (Frank).
Many people in the U.S. do not agree with the Embargo on Cuba because they seem to agree with
the fact that the embargo hurts the Cuban citizens more than the government. Cuba's relationship
with the Soviet Union during the Cold War rose concerns about U.S. National Security, but the era is
long over. The USSR dissolved in 1991, and American policy has adapted to change in most aspects
apart from Embargo. If 50 years of sanctions have not toppled the Castro regime, there is no reason
to think the embargo will ever work. U.S. has economic relations with countries like China and
Saudi Arabia that have similarly been called out for repressing dissent. Iran, for example, stands as
the greatest threat to United States National Security interests in 2014 much like Cuba

Cuba And Embargo Essay example
Cuba and the Affects of the Embargo The island nation of Cuba, located just ninety miles off the
coast of Florida, is home to 11 million people and has one of the few remaining communist regimes
in the world. Cuba's leader, Fidel Castro, came to power in 1959 and immediately instituted a
communist program of sweeping economic and social changes. Castro allied his government with
the Soviet Union and seized and nationalized billions of dollars of American property. U.S. relations
with Cuba have been strained ever since. A trade embargo against Cuba that was imposed in 1960 is
still in place today. Despite severe economic suffering and increasing isolation from the world
community, Castro remains committed to communism. (Close Up ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Supporters of the legislation believe that prohibiting foreign investment will quicken Castro's
downfall. (Close Up Foundation) Many debate on the issue of why the U.S. should or shouldn't keep
the ebargo against Cuba. These debates deal with the effects of the Embargo on Cuba's economy,
humanitarian rights and health of the people of Cuba. The embargo today places a ban on subsidiary
trade, Licensing, shipping and humanitarian aid. (Close Up Foundation) In 1992, the Cuban
Democracy act imposed a ban on subsidiary trade with Cuba. This ban restricted Cuba's ability to
import medicines and medical supplies from third country sources. There have also been corporate
buy–outs and mergers between U.S. and European pharmaceutical companies thus adding to the
number of companies permitted to do business with Cuba. Under the Cuban Democracy Act, The
U.S. Treasury and Commerce Departments are allowed to license individual sales of medicines and
medical supplies, supposedly for humanitarian reasons to make up for the embargo's impact on
health care delivery. According to the U.S. corporate executives, the licensing provisions are so
tough as to have had the opposite effect. With this statement, it is assumed that there are fewer
licenses given out for humanitarian reason therefore favoring the embargo and aiding in the
downfall of health in Cuba. Since 1992, the embargo has prohibited ships from loading or unloading
cargo in U.S. ports for 180 days after

Research Paper On Cuban Embargo
It is said that President John F. Kennedy secured nearly 1,200 Cuban cigars just hours before
enacting the Cuban trade embargo in 1962. Many Americans probably wished they could have done
this before all trade between the United States and Cuba ceased as the United States now marks the
55th year of an ongoing embargo against Cuba. On February 3, 1962 President Kennedy signed
Proclamation 3447 to declare an embargo against all trade between the United States and Cuba. This
embargo consists of trade, travel, and commerce restrictions for all people and companies under
United States jurisdiction. The United States cut off all ties with this neighboring nation just ninety
miles off the coast of Florida. This was Kennedy's defense against communism, ... Show more
What do these countries have to do with Cuba? While despite these countries records of human
rights violations and differing governments, the United States continues trade, travel and commerce
with all of these nations. Wayne Smith explains how former President George W. Bush lifted trade
sanctions on North Korea in 2008 even amidst concerns about the nations desire to develop nuclear
weapons (Smith, Wayne). Cuba has tried to meet the high standards of the United States with no
avail. After the CDA was passed in 1992, Havana initiated a number of reform measures in 1993,
permitting farmers markets and small private enterprises, including private restaurants and repair
shops, use of the U.S. dollar as legal daily tender, and more favorable terms for foreign investment.
Americans are allowed to travel to other communist countries, nations known for human rights
violations, and even places on the list of State Sponsors of Terrorism but cannot travel to Cuba. The
United States even trade with countries of differing governments and policies such as China,
Venezuela, and Vietnam regardless of their opposing governments and Cuba should be no

The Impacts Of The Cuban Embargo On Cuba
What is the Cuba embargo? Is a commercial, economic, and financial embargo imposed by the
United States on Cuba. The United States first imposed a trade embargo on Cuba on February 3,
1962, in order to make things right with Castro's confiscation of privately owned properties and
other productive assets. The Cuban embargo was stablished with the purpose of establishing the
embargo against Cuba to reduce the threat imposed by Fidel Castro with the communist powers.
While the embargo was leading on, Castro remains strong and defiant. Castro refuses to allow true
free–market reforms and rejects democratic political reforms no matter what. Besides, Castro is
leading an aggressive international campaign to get the embargo lifted brutally without ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gasoline in Cuba is very scarce, and automobile transportation is not common, people go in bike or
walking either way than in an automobile. Animals are used for heavy agricultural activities. Over
half of Cuba's work force is now unemployed, although unemployment is officially a crime and is
punished with imprisonment.
Although the United States today stands firmly alone in maintaining the embargo, it must stand firm
no matter what, and more this days that Fidel Castro had died. Maintaining the embargo because
Cuba has not accomplished the conditions required to lift it until irreversible economic and political
reforms leading to democratic capitalism had taken place. The Cuban people must understand and
act that it is up only to them to solve the social, economic, and political crisis caused by the Castro
regime. U.S. taxpayers should no longer be engaging in to finance the costs of Castro's ceaseless
tyranny.
The United States must not abandon by nothing the Cuban people by relaxing or lifting the trade
embargo against the communist regime because they have done nothing for why the United States
should lift it. Instead, the U.S. government must neglect all pressures to abandon the embargo until
all of the objectives for which it was imposed are achieved! Anything less would create a sad faith
with the Cuban people, who nowadays are among the very few people left in the world who still
suffer brutality of a communist

Cuba And The United States
Cuba and the United States are two very different countries. Although they are only nearly 90 miles
away from each other it has been over 50 years since both countries have had any real relationship
towards each other, other than the hatred that seems to shown by the two countries' politicians. In
October 1960 the United States began to impose its first round of embargoes towards the small
island when Cuba decided to nationalize all of the American Oil on its county after the United States
without properly compensating the United States. The embargo that was put in place October 1960
limited the on exports to Cuba except for food and medicine. Then in February of 1962 the United
States expanded on its embargo from 1960 to include imports as well, but not before John F
Kennedy could get his hands on some more of the finest Cigars that Cuba had to offer. There are
many reasons for why the United States has placed embargos on the island of Cuba. Some will
argue that they should have never placed any embargo against Cuba and some will argue that the
embargo should have been lifted a long time ago, but as long as the country remains communist and
the Cuban people don't get an equal opportunity to prosper then lifting or not lifting the embargoes
on Cuba will have no real impact on Cuba and its people. Many people believe that the United
States is the reason behind why Cuba is so poor and why the people of Cuba are so poor. That's
partially correct. But before the Cuban

Fidel Castro Led The Cuban Revolution
"For centuries, Cuba 's greatest resource has been its people." – Pico Iyer
Nearly fifty–five years ago, an embargo was placed on Cuba, halting all trade between the two
countries. Fidel Castro led the Cuban Revolution, which began in July of 1953, leading to their
victory and the previous leader, Fulgencio Batista, surrendering from his position. Castro was an
American friend and had gained a great deal of support from Cuban citizens with his promises to
restore basic, essential liberties. Castro later began to stray from these promises, starting by
nationalizing American businesses within Cuba following by presenting anti–American behavior. In
1960, he initiated talks with the Soviet Union and began to progress toward communism, leading to
America creating the embargo in 1961. The embargo was mainly put in place to contain the spread
of communism to other South American countries. The terms to lift the embargo included, the
discontinuation of their communist ways and move toward democracy, and to improve the freedom
of the individuals whom live on the island. These have both yet to have happened, yet fifty–four
years later, the embargo is still firmly in place. Lifting the embargo can fix issues related to the
Cuban people, it can bring countless trade opportunities, and it can push for positive changes in
Cuba. Therefore, the United States should lift the embargo on Cuba.
In light of the Cuban embargo, it is easy to see that it is hurting the citizens of Cuba. Cubans

The Embargo In Cuba
In 1960 the United States, under President Eisenhower, established a partial embargo on the tiny
island nation of Cuba (Rampersand, 402). That partial embargo became a complete embargo under
President Kennedy in 1962. The United States established the embargo on Cuba to alter Cuba's
political clime. Looking back through the last 55 years, that goal has not been achieved. It is time to
end the embargo on the island nation of Cuba re–establishing economic, scientific and cultural
exchanges.
While Cuba has endured the embargo by the United States, it has not had the access to the rapid
development of medical progress. Therefore, Cuba has had to rely on internal development
programs to ensure the overall health to its people. Not only could Cuba benefit from access to
medical research and trade, the United States could benefit as well. William Keck wrote the
following in the New England Journal of Medicine: ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
...The answers are disarmingly simple. It remains illegal for Americans to travel to Cuba for non–
emergency medical treatment, and the embargo prevents products developed in Cuba from entering
the regulatory process of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration... (1507).
It is plain to see that the embargo has impacted citizens on both sides of the line for medical care.
Cubans have lost out on access to American medical research and the United States is clearly
missing access to Cuba's medical research. It begs the question of who the embargo is really hurting.
Both sides would benefit on removing the prohibition on exchange of technology and medical

Essay on Cuba and the United States
Cuba and the United States
The island of Cuba has been a focal point of American foreign policy since the acquisition of
Florida in the late 1800's. Cuba continues to capture America's attention as it is the only existing
communist state in the Western Hemisphere. U.S. policy has attempted to topple the communist
regime in Cuba since its outset in 1961. Policies designed to incite revolution, destroy the Cuban
economy, and starve the Cuban people seem to be at odds with American ideals of democracy and
sovereignty. It is, in fact, the very policies that the United States has implemented that have
strengthened and prolonged Fidel Castro's reign in Cuba. The relationship between the United States
and Cuba is paradoxical in that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This crisis escalated the importance of Cuban policy and created an awareness of its potential threat
among the American public.
It is not only Cuba's strategic location that places it at odds with the United States. Cuba's
ideological communist base creates even greater distance between the two nations politically. Since
its turn to communism in the early 1960's, Cuba has frightened the American public and been at the
heart of policy concerns. The defeat of communism during the Cold War, has been an objective with
the power override rational and logical policy measures. The threat of communism in Europe drew a
response from Americans that led to an era of foreign policy unlike that of any other period. As that
same threat spread into their own hemisphere, response to it became even more radical. Cuba
became more than a foreign policy concern as the public began to perceive it as a legitimate threat to
life and the security of the nation. These fears were proven to be justified in wake of the Cuban
Missile Crisis. Since those days of bomb shelters and predictions of nuclear war, Cuba has not been
able to shake its image as a time bomb on the verge of explosion. Cuba has been internalized as an
enemy. This has led to a state of emotionalism that overrides objectivity in policy making. The end
of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union has done little to change American perceptions
about the threat of

The Relations Between The United States And Cuba
The turbulent relations between the United States and Cuba became more controversial since the
Cold War. They reached their apex on 15th October 1962, when after realizing that the Soviet Union
was developing missile bases in Cuba, President Kennedy started taking strong procedures against
Cuba. Indeed in February 1962 he signed the Embargo, which has not yet been lifted but reached
improvements after more than 50 years, in April 2015 during Barack Obama and Raul Castro
presidency (Renwick and Lee, August 4, 2015).
This report will look at the difficult relations between U.S and Cuba, giving an outline of the
historical background, along with the explanation of the processes that guided the decision to
normalise these relations.
Moreover ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even though the United States had objections on Castro's Communist philosophy, they accepted his
regime (Suddath, April 15th, 2009).
Nonetheless Castro's government intensified commerce with the Soviet Union, nationalized U.S
properties, and hiked up taxes on American importations; the United States answered by rising
economic retaliation (Renwick and Lee, August 4, 2015).
Another fundamental event on the relations between Cuba and The U.S was on January 3rd 1961
when The United States closed its embassy in Havana coming to an end with diplomatic ties with
Cuba (Hudson, August 3rd, 2015).
The worst period in their relations occurred when in October 1962, President Kennedy imposed the
embargo on Cuba (Hudson, August 3rd, 2015).
The slow process of normalising U.S and Cuban ties began secretly in 2013, but it became official
only in December 2014, after 50 years of no diplomatic relations between the two countries.
On December U.S President Barack Obama and Cuba's President Raul Castro declared that they had
exchanged prisoners to start the re–establishment of their diplomatic relations. This normalization of
relations is a process that will continue for a long time, due to Cuba's Human Rights matters and
Havana's request to maintain restraints on Cuba's society and economy (Daily Mail, July 1st, 2015).
On July 2015, President Obama released a statement on the

The United States and Cuba: An Embargo for the Ages Essay
The United States and Cuba: An Embargo for the Ages
Cuba's colorful history can be documented to before the days of the American Revolution in 1776,
but today, American policy directly affects many Cubans' lifestyles because of a nearly 45–year–old
trade embargo that has been placed on the island nation. It is crucial to analyze the development of
Cuba and its neighboring island nations in order to discern the reasons for Cuba's current political
situation with the United States. The following paper will discuss the events that shaped Cuba and
larger Caribbean nations like Haiti, the Dominican Republic and Jamaica; next, a detailed
description of Cuba's turbulent history will help in explaining the Cuban transformation into a ...
Another similarity is the struggles each country faced after gaining its independence. This will be a
quick, but thorough overview of the manner in which each of these countries came into existence
today.
Christopher Columbus discovered Haiti in 1492 during his inaugural foray into the New World. The
island that Haiti now shares with the Dominican Republic was dubbed 'La Isla Espanola,' shortened
to Hispaniola. Despite this Spanish moniker, the western side of the island soon became an enclave
for French Huguenots that had migrated to Hispaniola from the northwest side, via the island of
Tortuga. The French took advantage of the Spanish capital, Santo Domingo, being all the way on the
other side of the island, and they managed to established a vital trading post in their new territory
they called Saint–Domingue, after the Spanish capital. By 1697, a treaty had been signed and the
western portion of Hispaniola officially belonged to the French, who made the territory flourish. The
French made Hispaniola thrive, producing sixty percent of the world's coffee supply by the mid–
18th century, utilizing land that the Spanish had neglected until the French took over
(http://www.haiti.org). As was the norm in colonial Caribbean island territories, slavery was the
main source of labor in Haiti, and slavery practices were especially brutal here, as the majority of
black slaves did not survive past the age of reproduction, as

Should the United States Lift the Embargo on Cuba? Essay
American international relations with Cuba have almost always been tense. The cold war solidified
the growing negative relations, and the embargo embodied it. But now that the cold war is over, as is
the Cuban missile crisis, we're left to wonder if the embargo is really necessary. Should the United
States lift the embargo of Cuba? All of the evidence, be it economic, diplomatic, or social, points to
yes. We should lift the embargo. The United States embargo of Cuba has its roots planted in 1960,
53 years ago, when "the United States Congress authorized President Eisenhower to cut off the
yearly quota of sugar to be imported from Cuba under the Sugar act of 1948... by 95 percent" (Hass
1998, 37). This was done in response to a growing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Goods or services of Cuban origin may not be imported into the United States either directly or
through third countries" (2001) . According to the Cuba Policy Foundation, the United States loses
up to $4.84 billion annually in trade and exports alone (Pepper 2009) . The amount of money being
disregarded because of now defunct reasons is radically lacking in logic. A simple repealing of the
embargo would bring both the United States and Cuba great economic success. The obvious
question presented by this information is, why is such an old idea, which severely limits the
necessary functions of international society, currently being continued? It's not like it's helping
anything. In fact, according to Joy Gordon, Professor of Political Philosophy at Fairfield University,
"the embargo is the single greatest barrier to Cuban economic development" (2010, 64). Gordon
continues by saying that "the United States measures against Cuba are far more extensive [than any
other embargo we have had], affecting every aspect of commerce, travel, economic development,
and even humanitarian contributions" (2010, 65). The embargo not only detracts from Cuba's access
to U.S. markets, but interferes in its trade with other countries. The embargo prohibits monetary
transactions with the United

The Cuban Revolution And The Haitian Revolution
Until sugar production made Cuba the wealthiest agricultural region on earth in the nineteenth
century, the island was considered relatively diverse, compared to others in the Caribbean. The
quality of soil was universally unparalleled, and gained countries interest. Although the French and
Spanish were in feud over the island, merchants from Portugal, England, and Holland participated in
trade, which brought diversity to Cuba. At the end of the eighteenth century, the Haitian Revolution
changed the racial, social, and economical demographics on Cuba. Seeing that the Haitian
revolution was a triumph of colossus proportions, the individuals who started it, embodied the spirit
that initiated the great uprising. From the late eighteenth century, into the nineteenth century,
formally freed slaved from Haiti migrated to Cuba in astonishing numbers. This not only altered the
demographics on the island, it brought in a new workforce that proliferated local sugar production.
Within a short period of time, Cuba became the biggest sugar cane producer in the world. The
United States gained interest in capitalizing from the islands newfound wealth, and being close in
proximity made the temptation of interfere with France and Spain irresistible. In the late nineteenth
century, the United States interfered with Cuba's fight for independence and increased their
investments tenfold. By the beginning of the twentieth century, the US gained control of the island
through ownership,

The Embargo On Cuba And The United States
In December 2014, President Obama started restoring diplomatic relations with Cuba. Cuba and the
United States have been hostile since the Cuban Revolution of 1959, when Fidel Castro overthrew
the US–supportedbacked dictator, Fulgencio Batista, and established a Communist regime. The US
rejected Castro's bid for equal economic partnership because they wanted to maintain economic
dominance. As such, Castro began seizing US assets, causing back–and–forth actions that
culminated in Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy placing an embargo in 1960–61. The embargo
was intensified in the 1990s, and attempts to relax sanctions cannot succeed without Congress
repealing the laws responsible for the embargo. Despite arguments that it would help fight human
rights violations, the US embargo on Cuba should be lifted because of its historic ineffectiveness,
the potential economic advantages of a repeal, and the democratic values shown by the popularity of
a repeal.
Historically, the embargo has been caused by errant foreign policy, and has failed to achieve its
goals for 55 years. As President Obama said, "'These 50 years have shown that isolation has not
worked . . . We will end an outdated approach that for decades has failed to advance our interests'"
(Baker). Cuba aligned with the USSR partly because of initial US hostility, and such policy is called
"an egregious foreign policy error, . . . in effect pushing Castro to become more inflexible" (Walke
and Bourassa). Cuba lost Soviet aid

Cub A Long History With Cuba
The United States has had a long history with Cuba. Within that long history came many arguments
and accusations, such as the demand that Castro request that the U.S. embassy staff be reduced.
Following that request came an outrageous accusation stating that the embassy was being used as a
foundation for spies. This made U.S. officials think that Castro's government was too anti–American
to be trusted. Castro started nationalizing foreign property and companies as a response to the U.S.,
so the United States decided to cutback trades with Cuba. America tried to resolve the differences
with Castro's government through diplomacy. Seeing that they could not come to an agreement the
united states decide to embargo trade with Cuba. Two months later, President John F. Kennedy
unleashed the Cuban exile force which caused Castro's military to kill or capture the exile troops.
During that time of banned trade with the U.S the Cuban's made "a secret agreement allowing the
Soviet Union to build a missile base on the island" ("Council on Foreign Relations") In October of
1962 the United States found out about the deal that the Cubans had made with the Soviet Union.
The U.S. set off a fourteen–day standoff, and urged that the U.S. ships quarantine around the island.
Kennedy demanded that the missiles be destroyed, so they came into an agreement with Cuba that
stated that the U.S. will not invade Cuba and that the U.S. will remove their nuclear missiles from
Turkey. After that was solved

The Cuban Embargo: An Economic Sanction that Never...
The Cuban Embargo: An Economic Sanction that Never Achieved its Goals. Close, But No Cigar.
History of Events
Before beginning my paper, I will give a very brief summary of the actions which caused the
original embargo against Cuba in 1960 and the actions the US has taken since then. Reviewing this
brief timeline will help to examine and critique the reasoning behind the embargo.
In the early 20th century, Cuba was a nation in constant political turmoil ruled by militant dictators.
Prior to the elections of 1952, Fulgencio Batista took power of Cuba in a bloodless coup. His rule
left the island in discontent and led to many movements to return the country to its constitutional
rule of 1940. On January 1st, 1959 Batista and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, Kennedy banned the import of all Cuban goods. While still planning Operation
Mongoose, on August 29, 1962, aerial photography captured picture of Soviets building medium
range nuclear missiles in Cuba. This would mark the start of the Cuban Missile Crisis. By the end of
October of 1962, the Soviets were viewed as a very real and persistent threat from Cuba.
Throughout the Cold War, the embargo remained tight and anti– Castro Semitism grew with the
perceived growing threat he imposed. Knowing the embargo alone could not defeat Castro, and "the
Castro government could only be overthrown militarily, Americans came to accept the permanence
of the Castro regime. The basic U.S. policy became one of containment. The economic embargo was
maintained to reduce the resources available to the Castro government to promote guerrillas in Latin
America and to advance communism elsewhere." During the Ford Administration in 1974, the State
Department ruled that Cuba did not represent a security threat to the United States, and therefore,
relations should be normalized. In 1975, the United States was ready to lift economic sanctions on
Cuba through the Organization of American States resolution. However, later that year, Castro sent
30,000 troops to Angola, effectively ending U.S. efforts to normalize relations. Later, Castro
withdrew the troops and tensions began to settle until 1980. It was then that

Foreign Policy: The US Embargo On Cuba
As the clock struck midnight on July 20th, 2015, a tremendous step was taken involving foreign
policy: the United States restored diplomatic relations with Cuba. This translated into embassies
being reopened in both of the countries. This was a huge move by President Obama and poses the
question: should the United States' embargo on cuba be lifted or should it be upheld? For decades
the United States has maintained an embargo on Cuba, this has sparked anger with the Cubans and
created a rift with the U.S. Despite the controversy, the U.S. should cease to continue the embargo
on Cuba for trade purposes, military ally opportunities, and human rights restoration..
Before diverging into why the embargo should be put to rest, the background and ... Show more
should lift the embargo is that Cuba is a prime candidate for a military ally. In order to understand
this reasoning, one must look back to the Cuban missile crisis. During this time, Cuba and the Soviet
Union strengthened ties by Cuba allowing the Soviets to store arms and build military bases, while
the Soviets promised to protect Cuba from invasion. These actions came off as threatening to the
United States due to being in an arms race with the SU at the time. The U.S. was angry at Cuba for
aiding the Soviets in the fight against them and subsequently cut ties with the island country. One
question to be asked is why did the Soviets use Cuba as a means to intimidate the U.S.? The answer
is proximity. Cuba is roughly 100 off the coast of Florida depending on location. So what does this
mean? Cuba is dangerously close to the U.S. and if Cuba joins or is invaded by one of the United
State's enemies, then they become alarmingly close to U.S. borders, which makes it easier to attack
and invade. It has been shown throughout history that weak or paranoid countries tend to make
allies with their surrounding neighbors. Perhaps the old saying should be like this: "keep your
enemies close, and your friends closer". Although, the United States did quite the opposite and let
Cuba fall into the hands of the Soviet Union due to the influence of Communism during that time
period. In a statement issued by the White House Press Secretary, it admits "At times, longstanding
U.S. policy towards Cuba has isolated the United States from regional and international partners,
constrained our ability to influence outcomes throughout the Western Hemisphere, and impaired the
use of the full range of tools available to the United States to promote positive change in Cuba"
("FACT SHEET: Charting a New Course on Cuba", 2014). By admitting wrongdoing to the nation
of Cuba, the United States is trying to reestablish ties with the island country in order to make them

The Embargo Act Of Cuba Essay
G'Jasmaree Rodriguez
Ms. Wade
Economics
December 5, 2016
Cuba Position
I think that the Embargo act of Cuba should not be uplifted simply because they do not meet the
requirements of business in the trade industry. The embargo also known as the blockade signed by
President Kennedy Feb. 3, 1962, consist of economic sanctions against Cuba and restrictions on
Cuba travel and commerce for all people and business under the U.S jurisdiction (Cuba–
embargo.procon.org) and acts of communist powers. It will only benefit the Government of Cuba
and not be beneficial to the citizens within the Island meaning that the money of financial gain only
supports the Government and overall not the biggest satisfaction of the society in the Cuban Island.
The political viewpoint of the perspective is that the United States having more than 75 countries
they do trade with around the world, Cuba that only has done trade with just about 7 countries such
as companies of Canada, Europe, and Latin America, those countries have not enjoyed economic
relationship. I personally think that their will be no difference if the president was to uplift the act
against Cuba they have failed to meet the expectations of deliberately honoring their commitment as
a friend or business to relay on. In 2012 Cuba was deeply in debt and owed $13.6 billion although
few countries still remain to import and export goods with them. For over 55 years the Unites States
has had restrictions hold against Cuba since 1982 the

Fidel Castro, the Cuban people’s Leader Essay
Fidel Castro, the Cuban people's Leader
Fidel Castro and the United States of America have a very tense relationship. The current president
of Cuba has helped the less fortunate people of Cuba in many ways, but in doing created conflict
between the wealthier Cubans who in turn have chosen to seek homes on US soil in Florida. Castro
is a very powerful leader who speaks for the people, in general, of Cuba. Since the 1960's when
Castro took power US relations with Cuba have decreased and instead of indifference to each other,
hostility has arisen main from the US towards Cuba.
Fidel Alexander I Castrate Ruz was born August 13, 1926 in Birán. He attended Catholic schools
before attending the University of Havana graduating with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Economic antagonism from the United States caused Castro to nationalize all American property.
The U.S. has tried various schemes to assassinate Fidel Castro and continues to economically isolate
Cuba. The CIA tried to invade Cuba at the Bay of Pigs to remove him from power but the Cubans
fought off the US. After the Bay of Pigs, Cuba because closely aligned with the Soviet Union. The
Soviets provide Cuba with large amounts of sugar and supplies. They also assisted in supplying
Cuba with economic and military aid. The money from the Soviet Union allowed Castro to create
many of his social programs such as his war on illiteracy and free universal health care.
Unfortunetly the alliance between Cuba and the USSR created even more friction between Cuba and
the US.
Castro has also successfully assisted foreign revolutions in Angola and Ethiopia. He was elected the
head of Nonaligned Nations Movement and has remained a strong critic of US imperialism (Team
1). The destruction of the Soviet Union has left Cuba in a poor economic state and lost Castro his
recognition as an international figure. Since the Cuban Missile Crisis, Castro has remained in power,
outlasting seven American presidents. His guidance of the Cuban people has sought to improve
education, housing, and health for all Cubans despite the struggles from a troubled economy.
During Castro's trial he represented himself because

Hubert Humphrey once said "National isolation breeds national neurosis". The island country of
Cuba has been under an embargo banning trade to and from the U.S. for over 54 years.
Subsequently the country of Cuba has faced debt and poverty. The embargo on Cuba is controversial
because the U.N. has called to end the embargo, but the U.S has rejected their advice.
The embargo was first put into effect in 1962. Prior to that in 1959, Fidel Castro successfully
overthrew President General Fulgencio Batista. The U.S originally supported Fidel and his new
regime even though Castro had communist tendencies. In 1960 the Cuban government implemented
heavy taxes on U.S goods. Then He seized U.S land and many companies. In response The
Eisenhower lead Government ratified tariffs¹ on Cuba. Decreeing "Yankee imperialism" Castro
turned to the U.S.S.R for support. The U.S then cut all diplomatic ties with Cuba. in 1962 president
Kennedy enacted a permanent embargo on Cuba. for the next three years there were many covert
operations to assassinate Fidel Castro or to topple his oppressive regime. in 1992, cuba shot down
two U.S airplanes; in retaliation the U.S introduced ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Richard Dawson" According to US law, Cuba must legalize all political activity,
release all political prisoners, commit to free and fair elections in the transition to representative
democracy, grant freedom to the press, respect internationally recognized human rights, and allow
labor unions. Since Cuba has not met these conditions, the embargo should not be lifted." (Dawson,
13) another reason is that the U.S uses the embargo to apply pressure to the Cuban Government to
improve human rights. According to the United Nations charter All countries have the "Moral
obligation" to uphold and enforce the universal declaration of rights. There is a duty to withhold the
rights of our fellow humans who can't defend

The Cuban Embargo: A Double Edged Sword
In five decades, the Cuban embargo has failed to achieve its purpose, damaged U.S interest, and
affected the Cuban people. Since the year 1959 when Fidel Castro took over Cuba, the country has
been under communist rule. It's been over 50 years since the United States placed and embargo
against Cuba. The embargo also known as "the blockade" places travel restrictions and trade of
commerce on any one who is under the US jurisdiction. One of the purposes of the embargo was to
turn Cuba into a democratic country and to fight for human rights. Nothing has changed and now
Cuba is blaming the U.S. for its chronic starvation and economic devastation. The U.S has had
relations with Cuba since the Spanish–American war in 1898. Since Spain was ... Show more
He had harsh words for the U.S during his first trip out of Cuba. "Just like her, many others have
died attempting to go to the United States. But it's the U.S. Government fault. Their unjust embargo
provokes and internal and critical situation in Cuba" Gonzalez Said.
Gonzalez was in Ecuador and was asked to speak at a conference for the World Festival and Youth
of Students he said he wasn't too sure what his topic would be." My topic could range anywhere
from lifting of the unjust blockade on Cuba the freedom of the 'Cuban Five'. The main reason we're
here is because we want a revolutionary progressive movement that leads to socialism," he said. He
is now a cadet in a military school and studying engineering. He is now and outspoken Castro
supporter blaming the U.S. for Cuba's economic crisis. Like Elian's mother many people have died
trying to come into the U.S. for a better life.
There have been situation in which the Unites States government has tried to soften the embargo and
the Cuban government has responded aggressively. Which makes us wonder was will happen if it
was completely lifted. When President Jimmy Carter tried to normalize relations with Cuba, Castro
responded by orchestrating the Mariel Boat lift in which 125,000 emigrants migrated to the U.S.
which included prisoner and people who were mentally ill. Growing up I

The Reasons Of The Cuba Embargo Against Cuba
Cuba embargo has failed. During the last 50 years, the United States government has maintained the
trade embargo against Cuba. The Cuba embargo was put in place as executive order by Kennedy in
1962 because Fidel Castro confiscated many America businesses in Cuba. The Embargo did not get
the result for it was indented. Furthermore, the embargo has been failed policy and it should be lifted
immediately for three strong reasons. First, the embargo helps Castro to stay the power. Second it is
bad for American economy. Finally it is political incorrect.
The first reason to lift the America embargo against Cuba is because the embargo helps Fidel Castro
to preserve the power. According to Griswold (2005) the embargo actually enhances Castro's
standing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to US Today News (2012) every fall, like clockwork, the vast majority of nations agrees,
and overwhelmingly backs a resolution condemning the embargo. In November, 186 countries
supported the measure, with only Israel joining the U.S. in opposition. In foreign politic relating to
the embargo issue The United States is great loser because every year many countries condemn the
embargo .However, The US government persists in to sustain the embargo, so the US engage a
political conflict with many friendly countries as Canada, France, Spain or Great British. Not only in
foreign politic the embargo affect to The US Government but also in domestic politics. According to
Brown (2008) in a dramatic shift, a new poll shows most Cuban–Americans in Florida favor lifting
the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba. The new generations the Cuban exiles have different point of
in how bring the democracy .The want reconciliation; in word start over again without revenge or
violence. The young generation of The Cuban –American want the transition same as Spain with
Franco or South Africa with The apartheid. Because, The Cuban America community has very
strong political influence, so The United States government will have many political benefits when
the embargo will be lifted. In conclusion, the US government will have many political benefits if the
embargo is

Impact On The Cuban Embargo
The Cuban Embargo Every world power has at least one means of communication with each other
and that is made through trade. Furthermore, trade is an essential part of a thriving economy and is
pertinent for a country to grow and prosper. It would even be argued that the concept of trade is
established at a young age, and is exhibited in the school yard through many medias. One of the
most common forms that trade takes place is through baseball cards. Moreover, each individual
experiences trade during their lifetime, and it is vital for a growing country to participate in trade.
Whilst trade can be an incredible assets towards a nation, it can also be one of the strongest foes.
The nation of Cuba can speak very clearly on this argument, specifically in regards to the Cuban
Embargo issued by the United States of America. The concept of trade and its effect on an economy
can be examined through the Cuban Embargo due to the United States' history with Cuba, the effect
on Cuba, and the effect on the United States of America if it were to be ended. Almost all enemies
and foes, at one time, would have considered themselves to be good friends, this situation
exemplifies the relationship between the United States and Cuba. For instance, in January of 1959
Fidel Castro overtook the Cuban government and President General Fulgencio Batista (U.S.–Cuba
Reltions, Suddath). Furthermore, Castro was able to do this with the help of the United States
imposing a 1958 embargo on

Embargoes are restrictions on trade between countries used to achieve some kind of goal. The
United States has imposed an embargo on Cuba to encourage the Cuban government to change the
way they run themselves because the United States does not agree with the system of government
they have in place. This embargo enacts total restrictions on trade and travel between the United
States and Cuba. The United States' embargo against Cuba should be lifted because it is doing more
harm than good to both countries involved.
To start, embargoes in the United States started with Jefferson's Embargo of 1807 ("The Embargo of
1807"). Embargoes are put in place by countries in hopes to maintain or restore peace between
countries ("Sanctions, Embargoes and Restrictions"). They can be enacted for a number of different
reasons including moral, political, or environmental objections or concerns (Berkheimer).
Embargoes seek to encourage a country to change the regimes or groups that have allowed the
behavior from which the concerns arise. They do this by way of bans on certain things like travel,
arms, or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both of these problems created by the embargo leave ordinary citizens to suffer, not their
government. Because of the wholesale ban on trade, American food and related supplies cannot be
exported to Cuba. Many of the Cuban citizens are malnourished which leads to medical problems
Cubans' do not have the resources to handle. Malnourishment also means pregnant women cannot
receive what their bodies need during pregnancies, leading to a high infant mortality rate for a
developed country. Due to trade restrictions Cuba cannot get any significant number of water
treatment chemicals to purify water for drinking. This has led to a decrease in the amount of safe
drinking water that is available to Cuban citizens ("Denial of

The Helms-Burton Act

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jennifer Perry

More from Jennifer Perry (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Helms-Burton Act