Crisis

Crisis
Crisis
"Crisis!" Anytime we, as a society, hear this word our ears perk up and the speaker has our attention. Usually when we hear crisis we think that it is
something with "the distinct possibility of a highly undesirable outcome" (Merriam Webster) that calls for immediate response. President George W.
Bush says that we are in a national "energy crisis" (Is Yucca Mountain inNevada a safe disposal site?). Bush has proposed a solution, storing all of our
nation's nuclear waste in Nevada's Yucca Mountain, but has been met with much resistance from Nevada residents and politicians and environmental
groups.
The proposal is that Yucca Mountain will be a "permanent disposal facility" for two types ofnuclear energy. Spent energy is from ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Lisa Gue, a policy analyst with Public Citizen says, "Yucca Mountain is an unsuitable site for an unsuitable project."
Many of the environmentalists oppose Yucca Mountain because they believe that the waste could contaminate our water supply. They believe that
water could corrode the canisters and then the United States would be confronting a catastrophe. However, a study, conducted by the DOE, found that
even if water would erode the canisters of waste, the waste would still have to pass through one thousand feet of rock to contaminate an underground
water supply. Obviously, this fifteen year study, completed in 1998, greatly encouraged progression towards completion of Yucca Mountain. Despite
these findings, skeptics still believe that water could be contaminated and claim that because the study was conducted by the DOE–which is pro–Yucca
Mountain–that it should be disregarded as biased.
The largest problem confronting Yucca Mountain is transporting the radioactive waste from temporary storage sites. The waste would be transported
by truck and train. Inevitably, accidents would occur during this process. The DOE says that special shipping casks should prevent any major impacts
from any accidents. Critics, who have dubbed the Yucca Mountain plan "Mobile Chernobyl," say that the combination of diesel fuel fires and
radioactive waste could seriously pollute our nation's
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Road By Cormac Mccarthy
"The Road" depicts a solemn and deteriorating environment that can no longer provide the fundamentals to a society due to the nuclear disaster. The
sudden depletion of the resources within their environment made it difficult for the father and the son to find sustenance. They were constantly
traveling towards the South looking for safe places to situate themselves because the father knew that they would not be able to survive the nuclear
winter. The genre of the novel is post–apocalyptic science fiction because it revolves around a dismantling society. Cormac McCarthy's "The Road"
depicts how environmental destruction finally gave sense for people to value the world and what it had to offer.
Environmental destruction irrevocably comes as a shock to human society, since people are so dependent upon all the resources that nature provides
them. "Ecosystem services are essential for human life... They include provisions of clean water, and flood control, creation of soil, pollination of
crops, providing habitats for fisheries, and other benefits that underpin human well–being"(Daily xviii). These assets provided by the environment help
the world run with ease giving the father and the son and their society the resources they needed until their terrain was contaminated by the
radioactivity due to the nuclear explosion. "The clock stopped at 1:17. A long shear of light and then a series of low concussions... He went into the
bathroom and threw the light switch but the power was

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plant
It is no doubt that Nuclear is very powerful and that it can cause some good things to happen but we can not ignore the horrible things that it has
done to our planet and ecosystem. There are two sides to this argument if we should close nuclear power plants or we shouldn't in my personal
opinion I think that we should close these plants. But before I had to make my decision I had to do some research on both sides so here is what I found.
One of the pros of Nuclear power is that, if we use Nuclear Power then we will use Fossil Fuels a lot less than we normally use them, and this would
help stop the greenhouse gases from going into the air. (CO2 and others.) Also, another good thing about Nuclear power is that it is low operation
costs, nuclear power produces very inexpensive electricity. Also, even though the expense of setting up nuclear power plants is moderately high, the
expense of running them is quite low. These Nuclear plants can be shut down if other resources are to be very high and when they are not in high
demand then the Nuclear plant can be up and running again. But then again, Nuclear power gives us new ways to defend ourselves for wars for the
future since we have used it in the past. However, the normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40–60 years, depending on how often it is used
and how it is being used. Even if we run out of Nuclear power then we might be able to still use the fission reaction to make more reliable resources in
the future

The Chernobyl Meltdown
History of Nuclear Power plants has shown human society that it is unreliable and unpredictable. Behrens and Rosen show the devastation that
Chernobyl had on the human population after the large scale meltdown. "Fukushima was the worst nuclear disaster since 1986, when the Chernobyl
nuclear power reactor in the Ukraine suffered a meltdown, eventually exposing over half a million cleanup workers to toxic levels of radioactivity
and releasing lesser levels of contamination over much of the western USSR and Europe" (Behrens, Rosen 292). Chernobyl is a prime example of
nuclear power plant reactions when they have meltdowns and fail. Chernobyl was a severe case but it gives the public a good idea of what happens
when these power plants are not properly ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Now think about Japan, It suffered its worst earth quake in perhaps 1,100 years, followed by a direct–hit tsunami on two nuclear plants" (Holman
294). Holman's belittlement of these events is not some thing that should be shoved off like Holman wants the public to do. Even after many years
of clean up and careful watching, Chernobyl is still considered inhabitable by humans. "Hundreds of miles around Chernobyl remain uninhabitable
today" (Behrens, Rosen 292). This is one of the largest draw backs to using Nuclear Power plants, is the long term effects it causes in the areas that
human society had thrived in. Learning from these large scale nuclear melt downs can help scientist to try and create a nuclear power plant that will
be able to avoid these meltdowns. Robinsons explains in his article how there's always going to be that chance of a melt down. "We can engineer
nuclear power plants so that the chance of a Chernobyl–style disaster is almost nil. But we can't eliminate it completely–nor can we envision every
other kind of potential disaster" (Robinson

The Nature Of Nuclear Politics And The 21st Century : A...
Introduction – The Nature of Nuclear Politics in the 21st Century: A New Paradigm or Overblown Hysteria? From the onset of its creation, nuclear
weapons have dominated the headlines and more importantly occupied the minds of policymakers. Cold warriors likely remember drills in school, to
shelter in place in the event of a nuclear attack or accident. Moreover they likely remember the general uneasiness and uncertainty that a nuclear attack
was imminent. Thankfully, thecold war has ended, but the world's fascination with nuclear weapons has not. The post 9/11 era has brought non–state
actors, namely organized terrorist groups, to the fold. Because these groups do not exercise sovereign in any given territory, the worry is that the idea
of mutually assured destruction does not apply to these groups. Furthermore some actors on the international stage are worried that rogue or criminal
states will aid terrorist groups in their search for nuclear weapons and that the US would be powerless to stop them. In fairness, there is a chance,
however small, that such an event could happen, but should the US and other international actors be so worried about the idea of nuclear terrorism?
John Mueller and Michael Levi aim to answer this important question and many others in their books, Atomic Obsession and On Nuclear Terrorism
respectively. The purpose of this piece is to summarize the author's main arguments, compare them and explore gaps in policy that these arguments may
fill.

Nuclear Technology And Its Impact On The Atomic Age
On August 6th and 9th, 1945 the first atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Japan. With the use of these new weapons a door was
opened that could never be closed, a new and uncertain era was now upon the world, and the use of atomic power could mean the betterment or
destruction of a nation at a moment's notice. Whether you like it or not, you live in the atomic age and it can have many implications that you may or
may not know about. The Manhattan Project is well known to have developed the first two atomic bombs, fat man, and little boy, but nuclear
technology was being researched many years before this. Uranium was first found in 1789 by Martin Klaproth, and was discovered to have ionizing
radiation in 1895 by Wilhelm Rontgen (Outline History of Nuclear Energy). More and more information on uranium and other materials were being
discovered, such as: radioactive materials emitting alpha particles in 1896 by Henri Becquerel, in 1902 the discovery of radiation being a spontaneous
event by Ernest Rutherford, Niels Bohr and his increased understanding of the atom, in 1932 when James Chadwick discovered the neutron, etc. Other
nations also spent resources on developing nuclear technology such as in Russia with their Radium Institute of Leningrad FTI, but was hampered with
Stalin's purges that eliminated prominent scientists working there; British scientists developed the concept of the atomic bomb with the MAUD
committee in 1940 and continued research on the

Do You Know The Repercussions For Using Nuclear Energy?
Do you know the repercussions for using nuclear energy? Do you know how much it costs to fund nuclear energy? Do you know what a nuclear
accident could do to thousands of people? Nuclear energy was first used in a peaceful manner, but in August 6, 1946, a tragic event called Hiroshima
happened. (The History of Nuclear Energy 1985) Nuclear energy should not be used because it can cause a negative impact on all living beings, it is
an expensive way to produce energy, and nuclear energy can cause great tragedies.
First, nuclear energy can cause negative impacts to people's lives. For instance, in the environment and health, when using cooling water systems to
keep nuclear power plants from overheating, many harmful outcomes can occur to our wildlife that impact the community. As mentioned by Rose
Kivi, "First, the cooling system pulls water from an ocean or river source. Fish are inadvertently captured in the cooling system intake and killed.
Second, after the water is used to cool the power plant, it is returned to the ocean or river. The water that is returned is approximately 25 degrees
warmer than the water was originally. The warmer water kills some species of fish and plant life" (Kivi 2017). This will not only decrease the
population of marine animal species, but it will also create an imbalance in the ecosystem. It will pollute the nearby water sources available to humans.
Furthermore, nuclear energy can negatively affect human bodies. For example, it can cause cancer.

Switching To Nuclear Energy
People who support nuclear energy argue that it is an efficient source of energy. This means that energy can be produced quickly and people can use
it when they need it. It makes enough energy to provide people with their desired needs. These people also believe that it is easy to make the switch to
nuclear power. That it is easy to add power plants and switch to nuclear energy. People who agree with nuclear energy believe that even though it takes
carbon dioxide to create these power plants, once they are running, they will cut down on CO2 emissions (1). It is very deceiving because at first it
appears like we would be eliminating the majority of fossil fuels that are being burned. However, people don't realise that even though the factories ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Building enough power plants to provide the world with energy would mean increasing our CO2 production in the process of making them. Once the
power plants are built, although they don't use CO2 to produce energy, to keep the factories running and transport all of the waste releases more CO2
(1). Switching to renewable energy would progress us further into stopping climate change. We would be cutting down on CO2 emissions by a much
greater amount. This would make a more significant difference on the climate change (1). This shows that using renewables would make a larger
impact on the world and how to help save it. The Industry already has technology to switch to 100% renewables, they just don't want to let go of their
nuclear technology (4). Another danger of nuclear power is the risk of terrorism and violence. People are worried that if violent protesters advance on
nuclear technology, the amount of violences will increase. This is another reason to end our nuclear technology knowledge while we can (1).
Furthermore, not only do nuclear plants harm the industry and economy, they also harm the people and the environment. The evidence is showing that
being around nuclear radioactivity causes people to have cancer. Not only does the radiation cause people to have cancer, but it also damages their
DNA. Additionally, it harms the environment, not just humans. Animal's are affected in several different forms. Some examples are, Diarrhea,
vomiting, internal bleeding, anemia, exhaustion, permanent sterilization and death

Essay on The Atomic Cafe
The Atomic Cafe The Atomic Cafe is a 1982 documentary film compiled of clips from government propaganda, training films, news stories,
advertisements and other media from the 1940's through the 1950's. Many films were prepared by the U.S. government either for the military or for
its citizens to view. The form of Atomic Cafe was unique for documentaries. It was produced entirely of different film sources edited together, without
narration. The film made its points solely through the selection and order of the clips included in the documentary. The purpose of the film was to
show the American people of the 1980's exactly how the government distributed propaganda and deceived the American citizens of the 1950's. Atomic
Cafe is a... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The government knew that such actions and the "Duck and Cover" methods recommended in schools would, in fact, provide absolutely no
protection against exposure to fallout. The government also promoted building a fallout shelter, stocked with supplies of canned goods, as a way to
survive atomic war. This was only a partial truth, since a shelter could protect from radiation, but not from fire storms. The filmmakers' main ideas are
that the government misled and lied to the people of the U.S. so that they would believe that the atomic bomb would have no effect on their health and
security, that we should question if the government should have lied to the American people, and to make us question whether or not the citizens of
the U.S. would continue to be as naive as the people of the 1950's. I do mostly agree with the filmmakers' thesis. It is obvious that the government was
lying and misleading the people of the U.S. regarding the ability to survive nuclear war. I don't think that it was entirely right that the government lied
to the U.S. people. I don't believe it was the government's place or choice to withhold such important information. Citizens have a right to know, but in
cases, it's better for them to not know to prevent riots and episodes of mass hysteria. If the citizens had known all the facts about the horrible
consequences of a nuclear war, there might have been more opposition to the continuing

Eng 102 Project Research Paper
My favorite ENG 102 project was how radioactive elements released into the Atlantic Ocean affected marine life due to the Fukushima nuclear
reactors. As much as I struggled with writing and formatting my paper it was very rewarding none the less. Interesting enough I found who I was
when I was looking for research articles about the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. It was privy to me that I was fascinated about the bazar
techniques used to harness energy through nuclear fusion and fission. When I began my voyage I believed that these technical details about nuclear
reactors was not something I was going to enjoy, but necessary for my report. I was wrong. I was fascinated; I completely submerged myself in
nuclear chemistry. I read papers

Persuasive Essay On Grand Canyons
The world is full of wonderful and amazing natural scenery, many of them located in the United States. One of these is the Grand Canyon. Just
imagine an amazing view, with a gorgeous desert and mountainous landscape in the background. When you look down, there is an amazing canyon
with a river on the bottom and so breathtaking that it makes people feel like they could become an eagle and just soar around this beautiful place.
There are animals, birds, trees and so much beauty that it could inspire anyone to do anything. It is one of the most awe–inspiring places I've ever been
in and would recommend it to all. But now imagine looking at this with a radioactive suit on, and looking more like a wasteland. There are many
dangers, mostly human produced, surrounding beautiful places like this, and in the Grand Canyons case, one of these dangers is uranium mining. This
activity produces many health and environment hazards that could destroy one ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, there was a dam break in 1979 In New Mexico that released radioactive waste water in to the Little Colorado River. There are four
streams in the Grand Canyon park that are currently suffering from contamination by the mining activity. In Utah, they are still trying to clean up one
of the nation's first mines in Moab and in Colorado, neighbors of a small community of Lincoln Park have had to stop drinking well water because of
contamination (Anna Aurilio et all 2).
Many groups and environmentalists have been fighting these mines and have had success and draw backs. In a story provided by Warren Day and
Jennifer Lavista, from the USGS, they state that the Secretary of State in 2012 withdrew all federal lands from any uranium mining petitions to be
able to better study the effects for at least 20 years. While this was somewhat a victory, the setback was that current opened mines could stay

Nuclear Engineering Research Paper
One of the world's most reliable and clean resource for energy is nuclear energy. There is a lot of information about how to become, and what
nuclear engineers do. Nuclear energy will be one of the best sources of energy to use in the future, once nuclear scientist find out how to harness the
power of fusion it will be a big game changer in energy. Once they do, it will be a cheaper, safer, and a more reliable alternative to other energy
sources. As of this moment nuclear scientist are making breakthroughs on how to harness the power of fusion. Once nuclear scientist figure out how to
harness the energy of fusion, they will build more nuclear power plants and those plants will need engineers. In the future a reliable job to pursue would
be nuclear engineering.
The duties of this occupation, both general and specific, are important to know for becoming a nuclear engineer. The duties for this job include
designing or develop equipment, such as reactor cores, radiation shielding, and other instrument that are needed to run a nuclear plant. Some engineers
tell the workers what needs to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The majority of nuclear engineers work full time, but one in three engineers work more than forty hours a week. Their schedules may vary
depending on company they work for.The majority of nuclear engineers work full time, and some work overtime. These schedules may vary
according to the industries in which they work ("Nuclear"). The hazards or disadvantages of being a nuclear engineer are high. Nuclear Engineers
work in teams to see caution and risk easly are standard for the industry appropriately so, given the dangers of nuclear radiation. The work done in
nuclear power stations is usually indoors, often on a seven–day shift system, and conditions can be both hot and cramped. The advantages of being a
nuclear engineer is that it has a higher pay than most engineering jobs

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plant
The way a nuclear power plant produces energy is by a process called nuclear fission which is splitting the nucleus of an atom. Fission turns water into
steam and the steam makes pressure. Then the steam that is made turns a turbine that is connected to a generator and the turning of the turbine forces
the generator to produce electricity ("Nuclear Fission"). The energy source for a nuclear power plant is Uranium and it is a very rare resource. Once it's
gone then it's gone forever and when that happens then we cannot produce anymore nuclear energy. Depending on the demand of Uranium, it is
estimated that this element will only last another thirty to sixty years. I am not for nuclear energy because I think that the cons out weigh the pros.
There are tons of issues with nuclear energy. Some bad stuff that happens are the high cost to build a nuclear power plant, it's not a renewable source
of energy, the nuclear waste it produces, and nuclear accidents. The question to ask is do the pros outweigh the cons? France is concerned about all
those problems so they are looking to close up to seventeen nuclear power plants by 2025. They want a renewable energy source but if they do this
then they run into a problem which is seventy–five percent of their electricity comes from nuclear energy which is the highest percentage in the world.
Frances plants are also getting old. The average life span of a plant is built to last only forty years. Fifteen out of fifty–eight of them are over

Atomic And Nuclear Bomb : Atomic Bomb
Atomic/Nuclear bomb The atomic bomb ended WWII when the United States dropped Fat Man and Little Boy on the japanese cities of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. This is what started the arms race known as the Cold War between the United States and Russia, the two major world superpowers left
after WWII. The effects of the massive arms race between the two countries still to this day affect every citizen in the world due to the fact so many
weapons of mass destruction were made some were even lost. Along with this, come many groups such as ISIS and Al–Qaeda and even the country of
North Korea that seek to possess these bombs and or make their own to use for their own evil intentions against the free world.The world has rested
on the policy of M.A.D (mutual assured destruction) for too long but with threat of suicidal extremists, this policy won't work any longer so we must
discard of our Metal Horsemen of the apocalypse and use nuclear energy for life instead of death. In the twenty–first century the threat of nuclear war
is still prominent but instead of the U.S.S.R the threat is now centralized in the Middle East and North Korea. So instead of building more bombs, as
we did in the age of the red scare, we are now disarming them according to Sharon Squassoni the Director and Senior Fellow of the Proliferation
Prevention Program . But problems in the middle east and with North Korea have caused us to keep a larger quantity on stand by. The United States is
taking preventative

Nuclear Facility in the Canterbury Council
Today I am writing to you today to inform you that building a nuclear facility in the Canterbury Council would be nothing but harmful and damaging
towards our community. In order to explain and elaborate on this topic defining what an atom means is extremely valid. Atoms are composed of three
type of particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons are heavier than electrons and lay in the center of the atom, which is called the
nucleus. Electrons are extremely lightweight and exist in a cloud orbiting the nucleus. The electron cloud has a radius 10,000 times greater than the
nucleus.
This is a great example of an atom:
пїј
A nuclear reaction is considered to be the process in which two nuclei of an atom and a subatomic particle (such as a proton or neutron) collide to
produce one or more nuclides that are different from the original nucleus that began the process. Thus, a nuclear reaction must cause a transformation
of at least one nuclide to another. Nuclear reaction" is a term implying an induced (forced/man made) change in a nuclide.
пїј
In this is a symbolic representation of a nuclear reaction, they react from the intermediate nucleus. Then decays immediately into two alpha particles.
The protons are symbolically represented by the red spheres, and the neutrons by the blue spheres.
Radioactive isotopes are used for numerous basic science and engineering, mainly for things such as, medical imaging procedures and environmental
and industrial tracers.

How Does Nuclear Power Negatively Affected The World
Ever since the discovery of the nucleus of the atom in 1911, the world has been influenced
negatively by the atom ("May"). In every atom, in the center, in the nucleus, a certain number of
protons and neutrons make up the base, with electrons whizzing around it. If the nucleus of
certain atoms is split, a devastating explosion, incinerating everything within the vicinity, a blast
basically causing mass destruction will follow ("Nuclear Weapons Work").Nuclear power, a
seemingly harmless way of making power, is another way nuclear energy is harming and has
harmed the world. It is expensive, hazardous, inconsistent, and bad for the environment (Buzz).
Two major disasters have occurred because of nuclear power plant malfunctions. The Chernobyl ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to a New York Times article published on June 30th a year after the attack, 4.7 square
miles of Hiroshima were destroyed, and 70,000 to 80,000 people were killed or missing. About
70,000 were injured as well ("Figures"). This is a very good example of how nuclear bombs have
negatively affected the world, as the city of Hiroshima is still recovering nearly 80 years later.
Three days after Little Boy was dropped on Hiroshima, Fat Man, (the name of the other atomic
bomb) was dropped over the city of Nagasaki, Japan. On an ordinary midsummer's day, at about

10:02, Fat Man was dropped. The city was very unsuspecting, and only about seven minutes
after the bomb was dropped, the alarm sounded, so just 400 people made it safely into the bomb
shelters underground. In Nagasaki, hills border the city, so the destruction radius of the bomb
was not as bad as the bomb dropped in Hiroshima, but the results were still terrifying ("Effects").
One and eight tenths of square miles were destroyed, 35,000 to 40,000 were killed or missing,
and another 40,000 were injured ("Figures"). Although the numbers in Hiroshima were a little

How Did The Three Mile Island Meltdown
Because of a malfunction in a nuclear generating plant near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, the effects were devastating. Although no one's health was
seriously affected, the public's fear of any other disaster happening in cause of what is dubbed as the Three Mile Island Incident closed down many of
the surrounding plants in the area.
In 1979, at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, a cooling malfunction caused part of the core to melt in the #2 reactor. The TMI–2 was destroyed.
Some radioactive gas was released a couple of days after the accident, but not enough to cause any dose above background levels to the local residents.
Responding to the loss of cooling water, high–pressure injection pumps pushed replacement water into the reactor system. As water and steam escaped
through the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Investigation showed that minimum amounts of radiation leaked, not enough to cause any abnormal disruptions in the immune system.
After the major earthquake and tsunami that took place in Japan, Japanese officials tried to sort out whether jolted nuclear reactors could slip into full
meltdown.
Some experts compared the events unfolding to partial meltdown that occurred at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant.
"Three Mile Island #2 was a pressurized water reactor," Corradini said. "This one is a boiling water reactor. But in terms of approximate behavior and
how the plant runs, they are similar.
Although the Three Mile Island nuclear plant is similar to the one in Japan, it is quite different from it and the Ukrainian disaster at Chernobyl.
At both the Three Mile Island plant and the one in Japan were both mechanical, the devastating one in Chernobyl was caused by a human error.
After the cleanup of #2 at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant, safety and reliability were increased and training was improved.
The accident fostered better understanding of fuel melting and the containment

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power Plants
It is no doubt that Nuclear is very powerful and that it can cause some good things to happen but we can not ignore the horrible things that it has
done to our planet and ecosystem. There are two sides to this argument if we should close nuclear power plants or we shouldn't in my personal
opinion I think that we should close these plants. But before I had to make my decision I had to do some research on both sides so here is what I found,
One of the pros of Nuclear power is that, if we use Nuclear Power then we will use Fossil Fuels a lot less than we normally use them, and this would
help stop the greenhouse gases from going into the air. (CO2 and others.) Also another good thing about Nuclear power is that it is low operation
costs, nuclear power produces very inexpensive electricity. Also, even though the expense of setting up nuclear power plants is moderately high, the
expense of running them is quite low. These Nuclear plants can be shut down if other resources are to be very high and when they are not in high
demand then the Nuclear plant can be up and running again. But then agian, Nuclear power gives us new ways to defend ourselves for wars for the
future since we have used it in the past. However the normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40–60 years, depending on how often it is used
and how it is being used. Even if we run out of Nuclear power then we might be able to still use the fission reaction to make more reliable resources in
the

The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster
Sarah Byrnside
PhySci 111
Research Paper
24 April 2015
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster was a nuclear accident that occurred in 2011 at the Fukushima I Nuclear
Power Plant following an underwater earthquake that produced tsunamis, eventually resulting in a full nuclear meltdown and toxic amounts of
radiation being dumped into the atmosphere. This particular nuclear disaster is infamous because, despite the earthquake and tsunami, it is still
considered a man–made disaster. Had Fukushima plant workers been properly trained regarding what to do in the event of a nuclear disaster and had
the Japanese government reacted more swiftly and efficiently, the damage to the reactors would have been less extensive and a full nuclear meltdown
could have been prevented altogether. The factors that led to the meltdown, however, can be learned from and used to develop better safety procedures
and educate people so that hopefully the next nuclear accident can be avoided in the future. Simply put, the nuclear reactors at the Fukushima plant use
chemical reactions to boil water, producing electricity. They achieve this through the process ofnuclear fission, which is the splitting of an atom in two
and gives off energy in the form of heat. If one of the pieces of the split atom collides with another atom, that atom will then undergo fission and hit
other atoms which will undergo the same process. This chain reaction of splitting atoms continues on

Waste Management : The Problem With Nuclear Waste
Nuclear waste The problem with nuclear waste is getting worse everyday while we try and find a solution to dispose of the waste properly,
however there are some people who think that the nuclear waste project for waste disposal is not that serious and it does not have an affect on the
environment, but they are wrong because our lack of care for proper disposal of nuclear waste is having a tole on the environment where the waste
is buried and the life forms around these waste sites. Nuclear waste needs a proper and safe place to be put in, because if you don't, you could put
others lives in danger and contaminate certain things, such as the water supplies or the plants that the wildlife would have to eat for example,
storing nuclear waste in the Yucca Mountain would be a bad idea because the containers that they store nuclear waste in are known for corroding and
leaking and eventually getting into the water supply in the ground. The Yucca Mountain would not be a safe place to store high level nuclear waste
because the Yucca Mountain is an active volcano right now and if an earthquake should happen, the toxins from the nuclear waste would contaminate
the water line in the ground. Nuclear waste is also bad because of the cost to keep it in safe and contained areas. The nuclear business let's waste cool
for a considerable length of time before blending it with glass and putting away it in enormous cooled, solid structures. This waste must be kept up,
observed and

When It Comes To Power, There Are A Lot Of Ways To Produce
When it comes to power, there are a lot of ways to produce it. Inventors are constantly looking for new and more efficient ways to create power.
Unfortunately, scientists found a powerful new way to create energy but not intentionally for electrical fuel. In 1945, J. Robert Oppenheimer was part
of the team that created the very first atomic bomb made from Plutonium. The first nuclear power plant was not created until 1954. Despite incidents
such as Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three Mile Island accident, and the SL–1 accident, the government claims that nuclear power plants cannot possibly
have a core meltdown. For years, groups of scientists, doctors, and nuclear specialists have been trying to combat the growth and use of nuclear power
plants ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Once weapons of such power have been introduced, it is impossible to be completely sure that there are absolutely no nuclear weapons being built
in preparation for an attack by a radical group. Therefore, countries adopted nuclear power reactors in order to allow nuclear production in secret
to put the citizens of the world at ease. Regardless of their purpose, buildings with such dangerous material should not be used because people who
cannot control their situation get exposed against their will. When it comes to radiation, there is not a safe level of exposure. Dr. Ira Helfand
(2012) includes part of a report from National Research Council BEIR VII that reads, "Any exposure, including exposure to naturally occurring
background radiation, creates an increased risk of cancer," (Helfand, 2012. Para. 2). There is no escaping radiation as there is always a naturally
occurring level of radiation but there is a way to limit how much radiation that people are exposed to. Radiation adds up quickly and the adverse
effects from it are horrendous. Dr. Ira Helfand explains his concern for nuclear energy though his text, "If one person receives 1 rem of exposure... If
the whole US population is exposed to that dose, there will be 300,000 cases of cancer...the cumulative impact on the whole community may be very
significant," (Helfand, 2012. Para. 3). With the dangerous effects of radiation being so widely spread, why

Of The Movie 'Uranium: Twisting The Dragon's Tail'
Uranium: Twisting the Dragon's Tail
Uranium was formed from an exploding star. It all started when Henri Becquerel put a chunk of uranium and a film in a dark drawer, and when he
took it out there was a print of the rock on the film.
Radiation is used for many things. Before they knew it was dangerous, people used radiation for almost everything. They used it for its ability to
glow in the dark, put it in paint to make the colors vibrant, and even went so far as to take a bath in it to cleanse their body. Today, many types of
cancer treatments use a form of radiation to target and kill the cancer cells. It is also used in hospitals to sterilize needles and other things used in
procedures.
Uranium is still used as a form of energy. There have been, and still are, quite a fewnuclear power plants, the most famous of which is Chernobyl. A
meltdown occurred ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During World War II, Robert Oppenheimer discovered a way to force the uranium to split apart and release energy. The United States dropped the
bomb on Hiroshima, Japan and wiped out the entire city. It ended the feud between the U.S. and Japan.
I believe that uranium is a very dangerous thing. It can be used to help many people and keep them alive, but it also has to power to kill a lot of
people. Exposure to too much radiation can cause acute radiation syndrome. That thought genuinely frightens me. One little malfunction in a plant
somewhere and a whole lot of people will die. And for what? A bit of energy?
I am not totally against the use of uranium to obtain power, but I do believe that we need to keep thinking of a way to protect the people from the
harmful effects exposure can cause. If something goes wrong in one of those plants and cities have to be evacuated, everyone is affected. Not a single
person will come out with no harm. Even if it is something as simple as losing their home, it can still have negative psychological

Nuclear Warfare And Its Effects On The World
In early August 1945, President Harry Truman approved for two nuclear bombs, uranium–235 and plutonium–239, made by the United States of
America and the United Kingdom, to be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki bringing the Second World War to an abrupt end. On the first day of the
bombing, each city lost an estimate of at least one half of their population. During the following months, between 150,000 and more than 246,000
deaths occurred from the effect of burns, radiation sickness, and other injuries, compounded by illness brought on by the nuclear effects. This is act is
otherwise known as nuclear warfare and with the advancements of modern technology, the extent of damage is increased while the amount of time it
takes for these effects ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is just one example of the many nuclear weapons in the world. Nuclear warfare is caused by a military conflict or a political strategy in which
one uses nuclear weaponry to inflict damage upon the opponent. Some believe that politicians and military personnel only want to possess nuclear
weapons because of the heightened sense of power and feeling of security. It's scary to think that the human race is in the hands of the people who own
these weapons. The effects of nuclear use can be divided into four categories: instantaneous, near–immediate, short term, and long term. The heart of a
nuclear explosion reaches temperatures over a several million degree centigrade resulting in a heat flash over a wide area that vaporizes all human
tissue. At Hiroshima, within a radius of half a mile, the only remains of most of the people caught in the open were their shadows burnt into stone. The
near–immediate effects are the people inside buildings or otherwise shielded, will be indirectly killed by the blast and heat effects as buildings
collapse and all inflammable materials burst into flames. The immediate death rate will be over 90%. Outside the area of total destruction will be
survivors. However, these survivors will be blinded, suffering from fatal burns, bleeding from glass splinters, or have suffered massive internal
injuries. The death rate will continue to climb since emergency services would be incapable of responding due to destroyed equipment

Argumentative Essay On Stockpiles
When the topic of nuclear weapons, stockpiles, or power plants comes to the forefront, many people automatically associate nuclear materials to
terrorist. Because of that association, people automatically think the only dangers faced are when nuclear materials are in the hands of the terrorist.
However, that has been proved to be a false assumption as accidents at nuclear stockpiles and power plants pose a far greater danger to American
security than the deliberate use of nuclear weapons by terrorist. Throughout the paper, arguments will be constructed backing up the previous
statement. The paper will start with a basic understanding of fission and radiation to set the foundation of the basic knowledge of the science behind
the subject. Then... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is a well–known fact that terrorist has had committed a substantial amount of devastating terrorist attacks, but it is known that terrorist had actually
never used nuclear weapons in a terrorist attack (Lecture 12/01). With that said, these upcoming paragraphs are going to serve as the reasoning as to
why terrorist have not and will most likely not use nuclear weapons in terrorist attacks. First off, Ferguson explains relatively few terrorist groups are
likely to use nuclear weapons in a terrorist attack (Ferguson 176). This is due to a few different reasons, such as political, priority and environmental
reasons. As far as the political reasons go, terrorist groups may have feared that a nuclear attack would deter and scare off their supporters and allies.
For the priorities reason, terrorist generally like to commit attacks that cause instantaneous devastation to people and often results in many deaths.
Because the deaths from a nuclear attack would not be immediate, and instead a more long–term impact, this causes terrorist to move the nuclear attack
motives down on their priority list (Ferguson 178). This is related to the text in the "four faces of terrorism" as it said terrorist are more likely to steer
away from weapons that may not cause a significant amount of casualties'

Nuclear Power: Chernobyl, Fukushima And Three Mile Island
Why Nuclear Power should be banned
Chernobyl, Fukushima and Three Mile Island – all known as major nuclear power disasters. Nuclear power might be a good source of power, but in
the long run it can be a real hazard and should be banned. If we rely on nuclear power to be our primary power source, it will cause major problems to
humans and the environment. Nuclear power is hard to dispose of, expensive to run, and the reactors can easily be disrupted and cause the release of
massive amounts of radiation.
Firstly, nuclear waste is hard to dispose of. Unlike other power sources, nuclear waste is still not known about how to dispose of. This is a problem
because the waste emits radiation, which can leak into the environment. Chernobyl is

Nuclear Power Is Too Dangerous and Should Be Phased Out Essay
Just a few years ago there was a significant catastrophic nuclear failure. This failure caused huge amounts of radioactive materials to be released into
the environment. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster quickly became the largest nuclear incident since the 1986 Chernobyl accident while both
have affected the environment immensely with radiation. Due to the potential safety issues, the risk to the environment, and the dangers of nuclear
power, the use of nuclear facilities must be called off to prevent meltdowns and irreparable damage to the surrounding area.
One reason why nuclear power must be eliminated is due to the fact that it does not justify the danger it creates. According to Malik Imran's blog
entitled "Nuclear Power Not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
. . .Despite [that advantage,] nuclear power generation has some disadvantages in [the] post producing process. Radioactive waste can not be recycled
and has to be kept under strict repository until its half–life ends its radioactivity.
Even though nuclear energy makes more electricity, the cost of storing dangerous radioactive waste for the number of years it takes for it to reach its
half–life is preposterous. In short it is clear that nuclear energy produces more energy, but more does not mean that it is an efficient energy
production process or delivery system. Another reason why nuclear power needs to be eliminated is because it is too dangerous considering the
threat of short term potential for meltdowns. According to "Chernobyl Accident 1986" as published on the World Nuclear Association website, "The
April 1986 disaster at the Chernobyl power plant in Ukraine was the product of a flawed Soviet reactor design coupled with serious mistakes made
by the plant operators [and] was a direct consequence of Cold War isolation and the resulting lack of any safety. . . .[Though] it led to major changes in
safety culture and in industry cooperation[s]." Even though the Chernobyl accident has inspired safety changes, the risk of meltdowns are still too high
to continue the use of nuclear energy. More evidence shows the dangers created by nuclear power plants due to meltdowns caused by accidents.
"Chernobyl Accident 1986"

Nuclear Power Provides Materials For Dirty Bombs
Nuclear Power provides materials for "dirty bombs" which are nuclear weapons which have been made from nuclear waste material. This is bad
because it will make nuclear war not only terrifying but inevitable. Since our planet is filled with countries that have governments whom are
unreliable, and corrupt nuclear weapons can and will be pushed into the hands of unreliable people. Terrorist groups will have better access to nuclear
weapons, and will be able to use them against whomever they choose. Governments may also use these nuclear weapons to serve some kind of twisted
political agenda.
It seems plausible to imagine the government of Iran handing over nuclear warheads to terrorist groups that they have influence over like Hezbollah or
Hamas. Similar concepts are present in North Korea, except if the world were to switch completely to nuclear power Kim Jong Un may not have to use
Photoshop to demonstrate that he has nuclear weapons. During the cold war only a few countries had access to nuclear weapons, now imagine that
everyone has nuclear weapons. Every country in the world, and every terrorist group has the power to blow up cities, countries, and together the entire
world. [BOP]
Before Chernobyl, the catastrophic accident which occurred at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, nuclear power was viewed as a greater green
energy which would save us all. But this has been proved to be false because of all the different nuclear disasters. Nuclear Power plants are often built

Nuclear Waste Disposal Essay example
Nuclear Waste Disposal
As the millenium approaches, we are faced with the problems created by our technological advances. Everyday we are forced to see the results, from
acid rain to polluted beaches. But there is one problem in particular that will probably out–live our generation and the generation which has created it.
If properly contained and monitored, it has little affect on us and our environment. However, once it is free of it's containment, it is a destructive and
deadly force. This problem is nuclear waste.
Thirty thousand metric tons of spent fuel rods from power reactors and another 380,000 cubic meters of high level radioactive waste, have been
produced in the United States since the beginning of the nuclear age. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In a nuclear reactor of a nuclear power plant, the fission process is contained within the zirconium or magnesium cladding that surrounds the fuel rods.
The fuel rods are "spent" after the fission takes place. They are highly radioactive and give off dangerous gamma radiation, which is similar to X–ray
and can therefore penetrate through a human body. It is necessary to shield the spent fuel rods with water and thick lead walls (Bertell, 1985). These
fuel rods and their contents, are essentially what comprises nuclear waste and is what needs to be kept secure for hundreds of thousands of years.
Two types of radiation
There are two types of radiation; particle and penetrating. Penetrating radiation or gamma radiation, can pass through human tissue and damages cell
functions. After about 500 years, gamma radiation in nuclear fuel waste drops to low enough levels that it poses no real threat to humans (AECB,
1992). Particle radiation includes alphan and beta radiation. This type of radiation is given off by the longer lived radioactive substances. This means
that the substances remain hazardous for many thousands of years. Neither these types can penetrate human tissue. However, they can affect cell
function and therefore cause cancer if the radioactive substance has been ingested or inhaled

Synthesis Essay: How To Survive A Nuclear Winter
Synthesis Essay – With the Cold Extremely frigid temperatures sweep through the air, carrying fear alongside it. One might wonder what the
peculiar occurrence is. It is a nuclear winter. From both the story "Portable Phonograph" and the article "How to Survive a Nuclear Winter", it is
explained how one lives amidst a nuclear winter. During a nuclear winter, day to day life becomes a battle; it becomes a matter of survival. To
maintain any level of normality, one must delight themselves in a form of art, for art is what brings people together, no matter the form. Life vanishes
before their eyes; everything dwindles into nothingness. The only evidence of life remaining are bewildered faces. During a nuclear winter, there is an
extreme drop... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The dangerous UV radiation forces you to wear sunglasses and thick layers of clothing. Wearing thick clothing is also important, to prevent the
stinging cold from making an entrance. For one to stay safe from the dangerous surroundings, they must find a secluded place to make a home (a
bomb shelter is a good option).In this temporary home, one must be able to provide all the necessities needed to survive. Food and water is one of
the most essential items, along with matches/candles, and blankets. One must prepare for the worst and ready themselves for any length of time.
Along with the bare necessities, one must carry a weapon of some kind. With any kind of disaster, comes"widespread social disorder and chaos"
(Roberts, 2007, p. 4). With all of the abnormal behaviour, it is important to keep a level of sanity. People need human interaction, and one may go
crazy with a lack of socializing. A little bit of music or art will ensure that "[one] will have a little soul left until [death]" (Clark, 1941, p. 179). In
any form of disaster, the world shuts down and goes into a panic, like a bee trapped under a glass. Art is a significant role in what brings people
together and conserves normality. In the midst of nuclear war, it is a difficult time for all, so keeping oneself safe, while not hurting others, would be
hoped for. It is important for human life to continue to its best ability so everyone

Essay on Terrorism: Its Forms and Effects
In recent years, terrorism has been on the rise. The most famous attack in recent years was that of the destruction of the twin towers in 2001. It
caused a massive public outcry at the atrocity of the actions. What most people don't realize, however is that the people who make these attacks,
called terrorists, have a goal in mind. People also don't realize that there are many types of terrorism, and are not just limited to the attacker flying
planes into famous buildings. The types of terrorism are quite varied, the reasons for each just as much, and the public reaction is never the same for
any of them. Terrorism as it is defined is the use of violent acts in order to intimidate or coerce a population into a particular type of... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some examples of agents used in this type of terrorism are anthrax, botulism, and smallpox. Obviously, these diseases, and others that fall into this
category would be devastating if released upon a population of people. Therefore this would make these the prime thing for bio–terrorists to use
against their targets. Category B is the next most severe level, which are somewhat easily transmitted, but not quite as easily. They also have a
moderate mortality rate, and would take some preparation on medical personal's part (CDC, Bioterrorism Agents/Diseases). Some examples of
Category B agents would be E. Coli, Salmonella, and Typhus Fever. These diseases would be moderately devastating to a nation, and terrorists
would want them for being easier to obtain then Category A agents. Category C is the lowest level of pathogens. This tier consists of pathogens that
are in development, and are not really a threat to the public at large at the current time (CDC, Bioterrorism Agents/Diseases). These are pathogens
with high potential for mass chaos. These pathogens will have high availability, production and transmission rates, and potential for high mortality
rates. These are diseases that are being genetically engineered, and, because they are not yet fully developed, they are not very high on priority lists.
If they were to come into full use then they would most often be considered as Category A diseases. The second type of terrorism is

Nuclear Deterrence is the Best Defense Against Nuclear...
Nuclear Deterrence is the Best Defense Against Nuclear War
In 1945, a great technological innovation was dropped over Japan, the atomic bomb. Ever since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world
has faced the threat of nuclear attack. In reaction to this, world governments have been forced to find a defense against nuclear attack. One solution to
the danger of nuclear attack is the use of nuclear deterrence. Nuclear deterrence is the possession and launching of nuclear weapons for the sole purpose
of defense and retaliation against a nuclear attack from another country. Nuclear deterrence is the best answer to the danger of nuclear war, resulting in
world security and the prevention of nuclear war. However, some people believe ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is a huge expense in maintaining and building the nuclear arms that we use for deterrence. Nuclear information is secret, taking great amounts of
money and time, to research and keep it confidential. Power is gained from the research and development, which is definitely worth the expense. The
great amounts of money spent on nuclear technology help ensure the security of the people of the United States. It takes huge amounts of money to
have the edge in nuclear technology. However, nuclear deterrence is even cheaper than war. The cost of building, operating, and maintaining nuclear
weapons is only $26.7 billion per year (Hellman). "This is significantly less than the cost of the 1991 [Persian Gulf] war, which came to nearly $80
billion" (Dobbs). Deterrence is economically and politically intelligent.
The Cold War is over and some people believe that we do not need nuclear deterrence anymore. The U.S.S.R has fallen and Russia poses little threat to
launch a nuclear attack on the United States. Because of this, Russia and the United States have begun disarming their nuclear weapons. The United
States has reduced its nuclear stockpile of warheads from 31,265 in 1965 to about 10,455 in 2002, enough to use for deterrence ("Table of . . . "). This
disarming agreement is only between these two countries and they will continue to keep a minimum number of these nuclear warheads to deter other
countries. They realize that they are not a threat to each other,

The Debate Over Nuclear Waste
It is established that energy cannot be created nor destroyed and it could not be made out of nothing according the law of conservation of energy.
The way that science explains the phenomenon of energy conservation is by portraying the conservation of energy as a physical transfer of energy
between mediums through various forms such as heat, sound, and light. Since the discovery of fire in the early days of humanity, it can be
understood that heat is the most versatile form of energy. On the expense of sacrificial physical matter, heat is produced particularly natural resource
such as fossil fuels. While time progresses, the anticipated rate of decrease in fossil fuels has lead to the exploration of prospectively innovative
long–term energy supplies. Nevertheless, like fossil fuels, injurious resources have professed many questions regarding the discarding of nuclear
waste. This controversy paper will be mainly focusing on the question of whether nuclear waste can be disposed of safely.
Contrasting on the issues with fossil fuels, the depletion of nuclear resources cannot tangibly be consumed. Relatively when creating heat by utilizing
fossil fuels, nuclear resources do not breakdown into individual byproducts for example, carbon dioxide and water. In contrast, electrical power plants
use nuclear resources such as uranium and plutonium pellets. When these nuclear resources are used, they remain undamaged and become considered
as consumed fuel once it reaches an industrial

The Nuclear Proliferation Treaty ( Npt )
Uranium is the fuel most by and large used to make nuclear imperativeness. That is by virtue of uranium particles split isolated by and large easily. It
's also a particularly standard segment, found in shakes all over the place all through the world. Regardless, the specific kind of uranium used to
convey nuclear imperativeness, called U–235, is remarkable. U–235 makes up under one percent of the uranium on the planet.
Though a segment of the uranium the United States uses is mined in this country, most is outside. The U.S. gets uranium from Australia, Canada,
Kazakhstan, Russia, and Uzbekistan. At the point when uranium is mined, it must be removed from distinctive minerals. It ought to moreover be
arranged before it can be used.
Since nuclear fuel can be used to make nuclear weapons and what 's more nuclear reactors, just nations that are a bit of the Nuclear Non–Proliferation
Treaty (NPT) are allowed to import uranium or plutonium, another nuclear fuel. The settlement propels the tranquil use of nuclear fuel, furthermore
limiting the spread of nuclear weapons.
A normal nuclear reactor uses around 59,000 metric tons (65,000 tons) of uranium reliably. Complex methods allow some uranium and plutonium to be
re–enhanced or reused. This reduces the measure of mining, isolating, and taking care of that ought to be done.
Nuclear essentialness produces control that can be used to power homes, schools, associations, and facilities. The principle nuclear reactor to convey

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Systems
Topic 1 – Nuclear Power Plant Safety Systems IAEA Synopsis: In 1956, 81 member nations unanimously approved The International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) Statute, the guiding document for the creation of this committee. The objective of the statue stated that "the Agency shall seek to
accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world. It shall ensure, so far as it is able,
that assistance provided by it or at its request or under its supervision or control is not used in such a way as to further any military purpose." As
such, the IAEA was established in 1957 to respond to global fears about the potential dangers of nuclear energy. Since its creation, the IAEA has
responded to a wide variety of issues related to atomic energy. At the time of its creation, the primary fear was thatnuclear power could be an avenue to
create and use nuclear weapons. Indeed, this is still a concern today. Of late, the IAEA has focused on ensuring the safety of nuclear power plants.
Various safety–system failures in nuclear power plants calls for the revision of the current safety standards and approaches for maintain the safety of
nuclear power sources. One such event that caused this shift in focus was the Fukushima accident in 2011.
March 11, 2011–Fukushima Accident At 2:46pm Japan tremored under the Great East Japan Earthquake, magnitude 9.0. Although the earthquake was
offshore, the damage was catastrophic. The

Nuclear Power Shutdown: Is Nuclear Energy Safe?
Nuclear Power Shutdown
Nuclear power plants are one of the main ways to gather energy, but is it the best and safest way and cleanest way to get energy? Abe gilbert says,
"For now I will simply state that Nuclear Energy can never be clean or safe. Look at the hundreds of thousands of cubic tons of nuclear waste that we
have no safe place to store."(Abe Gilbert 4).Nuclear power plants are not, despite of what other people say, the cleanest and safest way to get energy.
Nuclear plants are harmful to the environment, are not as durable (long lasting) as other ways of getting energy, and they become potential targets for
terrorist who want to destroy the United States. People may argue that nuclear power plants are clean and are safe, but are ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In an article called Nuclear Power states, "Unfortunately nuclear power is not renewable as it uses radioactive 'heavy' metals such as uranium as its fuel
which is not very abundant. . ." (William Parker 1). Unlike other alternative ways to gather energy, nuclear energy is a way to gather energy that
doesn't last for very long. Lisa Zyga says in her article "Why nuclear power will never supply the world's energy needs" that "at the current rate of
uranium consumption with conventional reactors, the world supply of viable uranium, which is the most common nuclear fuel, will last for 80
years. Scaling consumption up to 15 TW, the viable uranium supply will last for less than 5 years. (Viable uranium is the uranium that exists in a
high enough ore concentration so that extracting the ore is economically justified.)". Most nuclear power plants can create energy for about five
years, maybe less, until the plant is no longer a use to gather nuclear energy. This in terms makes nuclear energy practically a lost cause. Nuclear
power is not efficient and it is a very unstable element to use. After most nuclear power plants are all used up, in a sense, the area around the plant can
no longer be used. Due to all the pollution a plant causes, the area surrounding the plant just becomes a useless piece of land that is no longer benefiting

Human Migration : How Globalization Can Be Described? Essay
This process of human migration depicts how globalization can be described in many different facets. Social and cultural globalism involves the
spread of ideas, information, and images (Nye and Donahue, 5). The individuals who carry these ideas, information, and images carry them to
different areas of the globe and thus spread new thoughts and creations. Technology can easily be involved with social and cultural globalism, as
many different areas create new technology and other locations replicate them. Some sociologists know this process of essentially copying another
cultures ideas as "isomorphism" (Nye and Donahue, 5). Isomorphism is used in multiple aspects of globalization but none more than technology.
When different areas create new advanced technology, there is no time wasted but other nations in trying to recreate said technology. Technological
globalization can be understood with more ease when the other facets of globalization are known, and how they interact. Technology as one
globalism does not act alone in shaping the growing globalized world, it is partnered with each aspect mentioned before to create a world that is
much smaller than we know, even if not in a literal sense. Of course, while there are multiple different forms of globalism that contribute to the
globalization of the world, technology has its own components that make it so unique. Literature Review: Technology and Globalization Social media
has shown to play a large role in the affect of

The Big Bertha Project
The Big Bertha Project The City of Seattle enlisted the world's largest tunnel boring machine called "Big Bertha" back in 2013. Since then, the boring
machine has faced numerous challenges. Since it's arrival to Seattle in 20113, Big Bertha has traveled only 1,280 feet out of the 9,210 foot destination.
At this point, the tunnel was expected to be almost done by now. But, due to the errors occurring with the machine and unexpected geographical
problems it has set Seattle back by two years of drilling. With so much time lost, many are questioning whether the city should continue to support the
project. The reason why Seattle is undertaking the drilling of this underground highway is to have an alternative to the 99 Viaduct in case of a major
earthquake. The current highway system starts at the bank of downtown Seattle's Waterfront. Engineers have determined that the Viaduct will not be
safe at all if a major earthquake strikes Seattle. One major issue today with Big Bertha is that the contract is not being met. The Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is trying to hold contractors accountable to meet the requirements originally agreed upon. This project is
taking up nearly 1.34 billion dollars of taxpayers money. The State of... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some are proposing that the state should cut the program entirely and cut our losses as there have been too many obstacles so far. Others
supporting the continued drilling of Big Bertha say that we are too far into it to back out now. It has been one of those things that have caused
people to wonder if it ever will get finished. This project is a major concern for every taxpayer in Washington as it accounts for more than $100
dollars for every person in the state who pays taxes per year. The drilling project presented a huge bill when the State originally approved it and it is
now costing way more than anyone anticipated. This is a huge financial burden for the

Nuclear Energy Disaster Waiting For Happen?
Nuclear Energy...Disaster Waiting to Happen?
On March 11, 2011, Japan was rattled by a powerful earthquake and tsunami. Thousands of lives were changed forever. As a result, there were countless
deaths. Notwithstanding, the earthquake and the tsunami destroyed homes, businesses, and roads. An excessive amount of debris was left behind. The
impact of the tsunami, as well as the earthquake, caused a major power outage which, in turn, caused a nuclear meltdown and/or explosion at the
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. In the wake of the earthquake and the tsunami that followed, there were long–term effects on the environment
as well as on the quality of life of the Japanese people. As there is always a chance of a nuclear meltdown and/or ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
One year following the nuclear meltdown and/or explosion, much of the area surrounding Fukushima has remained closed (Fecht). The land is riddled
with radioactive contamination. The timeline for clean–up will span is at least forty years (Ridley). Many evacuated residents remain in temporary
housing with little hope of returning home (Ridley). Still another issue affecting the quality of life is Japan's foodstuff. Following the nuclear disaster,
the government has had to ban provisions that were likely contaminated; they, also, have had to commence a massive food testing program (Gibney).
This not only affected the farmers of Japan, but small hometown gardeners as well. Of course, the region most affected by radioactive fallout is the
zone in the immediate vicinity of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Even with negative long–term effects, the Japanese government, yet
believes nuclear power to be a viable source for energy.
As of 2015, there were sixteen nuclear power plants in use in Japan, seven others were closed, and nine more were under construction (Gibney). Even
with the possibility of another nuclear disaster, the government has included nuclear power as a prerequisite for meeting and maintaining Japan's
energy needs. In June of the same year, Japan announced a proposal to "maintain [their] nuclear power [usage] at 20–22 percent until the year 2030"
(Gibney). Although the government

Nuclear Energy Is Not the Answer
In our modern world of today, we use increasingly more energy every day. According to the most recent study done by the US Energy Information
Administration in 2008, the world uses 493 quadrillion BTUs or energy a year, and 82% of the energy is generated from fossil fuels. This source
makes clear, that fossil fuels are a big part of life, and as they run out, it is more and more important to find a solution. In the midst of a polluted
world, what we need is a powerful, sustainable, and clean energy source. Solar power, wind power, geothermal heating/cooling, biomass burning, and
hydro–electric turbines all seem like good solutions. At first glance, nuclear power does too. Its powerful, sustainable, and will last a long time right?
However, if you take a closer look, and you can see that nuclear energy is not the answer. Nuclear power is not safe. An accident is likely to occur
every 10–20 years. For example, a European study from Science Daily stated that, "Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the
number of nuclear meltdowns that have occurred, scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz have calculated that such events may
occur once every 10 to 20 years." This evidence demonstrates that, nuclear accidents happen more often than we think they do. The dangerous aspect of
a nuclear accident is the amount of radiation that is spewed into the atmosphere and the surrounding environment. Radiation causes sickness, cancer,
mutations,

Crisis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Jamie Akers

More from Jamie Akers (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Crisis