IRJET- A Review Paper on Insurance Telematics for Vehicle Insurance

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 07 | July 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3593
A Review Paper on Insurance Telematics for Vehicle Insurance
J.C. Hadoltikar 1, J.S. Hatte2
1M. Tech. Student, Department of Electronics Engineering, M.S. Bidve Engineering College, Dr Bat University,
Lonere, India
2Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics Engineering, M.S. Bidve Engineering College, Dr Bat University,
Lonere, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Vehicle insurance is mainly used to provide
economic security against physical harm or physical injury as
a result of traffic collisions and liability that could also result
from car accidents. Additionally, vehicle insurance may
provide economic security against vehicle theft and harm to
the car caused by occurrences other than traffic collisions.
Vehicle insurance particular conditions differ with each
region's legal provisions This paper presentanproperstudyof
previous existing approaches and based on that we got some
previous the issues which needs to be solved in future.
Key Words: Telematics, GPS, PHUD, UBI, PAUD
1. INTRODUCTION
Vehicle insurance is mainly used to provide economic
security against physical harm or physical injury as a result
of traffic collisions and liability that could also result from
car accidents. Additionally, vehicle insurance may provide
economic security against vehicle theft and harm to the car
caused by occurrences other than traffic collisions. Vehicle
insurance particular conditions differ with each region's
legal provisions. Smartphone-based insurance telematics or
use based protection is a troublesome innovation which
depends on protection premiums that mirror the hazard
profile of the driver; estimated by meansofadvanced mobile
phones with suitable introduced programming. Majority of
figure of benefits are portrayed, broke down and ordered,
including occasions and properties like cruel braking,
speeding, and area. The arrangement of the FoMs regarding
Observability, Driver impact, and Actuarial pertinence are
apparatuses for powerful hazard profiling of the driver and
the trek. Legitimate driver criticismisquicklyexamined,and
rule-of-thumbs for input configuration are incorporated.
Vehicle digital physical frameworks by and large and
protection telematics specifically incorporate a huge
treatment of sensor information. The measure of sensors
accessible and their quick testing rate, infers huge
information when the driver's conduct is observed over a
time of months. Then again, toward theday'send,protection
telematics focuses on a precise estimating of the protection
premium, which ordinarily is an expense covering a year
strategy period, i.e., a scalar amount. The potential for
information and data pressure is therefore significant.
Information handling and data extraction can be performed
at the sensor hubs or halfway, contingent upon nearby
preparing force, limit of the remote correspondence
connection, andissueslikeend-clientprotection.Specifically,
purchaser protection can be guaranteed bya neighbourhood
preparing of information bringing about a restricted
measure of data moved to the focal hub. In its outrageous,
just the score depicting the hazard profileofthepurchaseris
moved. Current valuing arrangement of engine insurance
agencies around the globe whichistochargea singleamount
for each client is out of line and wasteful (Butler et al. 1988).
Drivers with comparative attributes, for example, age, sex,
area, mishap record and so on pay around the equivalent
premiums regardless of on the off chance thattheydrivefive
or fifty thousand kilometres a year. Bordoff and Noel (2008)
compared it to an eatery with a boundless sustenance
strategy for a fixed charge for every individual which
empowers individuals eating more. Separately, current
protection evaluating arrangement supports driving more
kilometers yearly, does not rebuff forceful driving conduct
and then again, it doesn't support reasonable driving
conduct. In any case, most importantly, this suggests
expanded number of mishaps, clog conditions, carbon
emanations, neighbourhood contamination and oil reliance.
Momentum evaluating framework is out of line since it
actually powers drivers with low mileage every year and
more secure driving conduct to finance the protection costs
for drivers who drive more every year and all the more
perilously. It must be noticed that exploration so far shows
that individuals with lower salary drive less kilometers. By
and large, every driver could be doled out a likelihood of
mishap contribution dependent on his driving conduct.
Charging all driversa singularamount,theoreticallyprompts
accept that the mishap likelihood is equivalent over the
whole populace of drivers. Clearly,thisdoesnotfroma client
ideal and socially fair methodology, as drivers with lower
mishap hazard arecompelledto"sponsor"thosewithhigher.
As such, more secure drivers are compelled to "purchase"
higher likelihood of mishap hazard than really exists, not at
all like perilous drivers who "purchase" less. An inventive
protection strategy could significantly affectsecurityrelying
upon its structure (Zantema et al. 2008). This can be
cultivated by separating premiums to reflect security,all the
more explicitly charging higher charges for risky street
classifications and evening driving, most successfully and
apply it to all drivers. The protectionapproachdependenton
vehicle use (Usage Based Insurance or generally UBI)
incorporates Pay-As-You-Drive Systems (PAUD) and Pay-
How-You-Drive (PHUD). PAUD framework is charging
premiums dependent on all out presentation attributes, for
example, mileage and street system utilized while PHUD

depends on individual driving conduct estimating
parameters, for example, speed, cruel increasingspeed,hard
braking and so on. The principle information hotspot for the
previously mentioned parameters are the car indicative
frameworks, OBD (On-Board Diagnostics), introducedinthe
vehicle as well as the Smartphone held by drivers, sending
all vital data in a focal database by means of portable
organize.
1.1 Literature Review
Insurance agencies have begun givingprotectionapproaches
which include anincentivetoclientsbaseduse.Thesepolicies
are characterized in to three classes dependent on the
parameter being considered for deciding the use. Mile-based
protection is the least difficult structure and considers just
miles driven. Pay how you drive (PAYHD) and Pay as you
drive(PAYD)protectionapproachesmeasuredrivingconduct
not withstanding separation voyaged [1]. The thoroughness
as far as kind of utilization is more in PAYHD contrastedwith
PAYD. Investigation identified with driving conduct can be
gotten from telematics. PAYD may utilize accumulated GPS
information to quantify intemperate speed, travel time
without break, speed and time-of-day data, use of mobile
while driving, separationandtimetravelled.Itmightlikewise
incorporate factual data with respect to the memorable
hazard of the street. Telematics give a bit of leeway to the
client by giving quick input circle to thedriverwithrespectto
the hazard included and the dynamic expense of the
protection. So it goes about as an impediment to the driverto
limit from heedless driving quickly for security of self, co-
travellers and people on foot. In the end approach holder
increase money related advantage by lower premiums or
extra augmentations. PAYHD approaches incorporate extra
sensors like accelerometer. PAYD has two plans in particular
essential plan and additional hazard premium. In essential
plan justkilometersvoyagedisconsidered.Additionalhazard
premium plan is pertinent on the off chance that somebody
drives excessively long without a break or goes at an
overabundance speed. Annual risk can be calculated as the
product of per mile risk and annualmileage.Itwasfoundthat
a relationship exist between reduction in VMT (vehicle miles
travelled) and reduction in risk. Mileage is not the only
important risk factor. However, it hasasubstantialimpacton
risk. It has an influential factor on risk prediction along with
other factors and not alone [5]. Poison and Linear models
were used to predict insurance risk using annual mileage. It
showed that mileage 978-1-5386-0569-1$31.00c 2017 IEEE
195 contributed explanatory power when used along with
other risk factors [6]. Premium cost model based on mileage,
location, timeand driving behaviour was built.Premiumwas
based on fixed cost plus additional cost based on the linear
combination of above mentioned riskfactorsandcoefficients
[7]. We may encounter insufficient exact knowledge of risk
factors and a large combination of these factors are needed
for the prediction risk. In this case fuzzy-linguistic
approximation apparatus is suitable for projection of the
evaluation of the ridewhich is usedtocalculatetheinsurance
premium [8]. A comparison of the performance of three
models namely, logistic regression, random forests and
artificial neural networks model was performed. Three
months of data was sufficient to obtain best risk estimations
[2]. The PAYD insurance model may likewise consider other
information not withstandingnumberofkilometersvoyaged,
for example, when, where and how the vehicle is driven. For
instance, it might be proposed that vehicle use is probably
going to include more serious hazard around evening time
and on occasion of the day or year at the point when traffic is
heaviest. The geographic area of ongoing vehicle use may
likewise influence the degree of hazard expected. Another
factor liable to impact the hazard level is the way the vehicle
is driven,as driving styleandpropensities,whichhavegotten
little consideration regardingdate, affect mishap rates.Afew
examinations demonstrate that human elements are in
charge of 90% of street mishaps and that 30% of these are
brought about by diversions (utilizing a cell phone, changing
radio station, putting out a cigarette, and so on.) [10,11].
Speeding is one of the foremost human elements influencing
driving danger and different examinations demonstrate the
preferences of utilizing speed the board frameworks to
improve street security. In the White Paper "European
Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide", the European
Commission attracts thoughtfulness regarding the way that
street transport is the most risky and expensive mode as far
as loss of human life ("one individual in three will be harmed
in a mishap sooner or later in their lives") [12]. In the event
that vehicle clients know that speeding will bring about
financial punishments implemented by means of their
protection premiums, they might be more liable to diminish
their speed, in this manner adding to lessening the potential
impacts of a mishap [13]. The inconvenience of this model is
that it just evaluates systematized driving danger, not
genuine driving danger. For instance, a driver who
consistently breaks as far as possible would be more
intensely punished thanonewhoconsistentlydrivesinsideit.
Be that as it may, this does not consider setting and a driver
who routinely breaks as faras possibleyetgenerallydrivesin
a protected way would be charged not exactly a client who
consistently drives inside as far as possible yet drives
sporadically or thoughtlessly.
1.2 Research Gap
In this paper basically we did the proper study about the
previous existing research and based on that study here we
got some of the issues which need to be solved and those
issue are:
1. There is lack of system which will automatically
take all records.
2. There is lack of system which will continuously
monitor driver regarding the safety precaution,
whether they are followed by him or not.

3. There is lack of system which will take full proof
action against drivers. After final profile monitoring
it will make a great help to the insurance company.
4. There is no any better system available which will
give the proper information so it will make a great
help to the insurance company to differentiate
between safe driver and unsafe driver.
5. As per the safe driving there is no any alert system
which will force drivers to drive safely.
6. There is lack of observing whether the driver has
drunk alcohol while driving or not.
7. The most critical part for insurance companies is to
recognize the importanceof environmental factorin
aligning the individual risk and price.
So these are previous research issues which need to be
solved
2. FUTURE OBJECTIVE
As per the previous research there is lots of problems are
there which needs to be solved so based on this all previous
issue these are the following points where future research
can go on:
1. Implementation of system which is able to track
all records automatically.
2. Implementation of the system which will
continuously monitor whether the safety
precaution are followed by the driver or not.
3. Implementation of system which makes the
differentiation between safe driver and unsafe
driver with the help of vehicle telematics data.
4. Implement a system with continuous alcohol
intake testing while driving the vehicle.
5. Implementation of system whichwill giveproper
information of car & driver.
6. Implementation of system which will motivate
the driver to drive safely on the account of
insurance.
These are the things which are still can be future
objectives.
3. CONCLUSION
Youthful and amateur drivers have a high mishap hazard
ascribed to chance going for broke presentation,forexample,
driving around evening time and with youthful travellers.
Telematics-based protection items can possibly lessen these
dangers. The upsidesofUsage-BasedInsuranceforcarcovers
over regular rating techniques have been talked about in
writing for more than four decades. Despite their
appropriation in protection markets has been moderate. In
this paper basically we did the study about the previous
existingapproaches andbasedonthoseapproachesthereare
lots of issue which needs to be solved. In future there is need
of a system which is able to track the driver safety and also
give the complete profile of the driver while driving which
will be helpful to the issuance company.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I want to thank a number of people for their moment and
their remarks. I want to give a special thanks to my guide
Prof. J. S. Hatte for her valuable guidance and opinions. I am
really grateful to her for her kind support. Her valuable
suggestions were very helpful.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Kantor, T. Stárek, Design of Algorithms for Payment
Telematics Systems Evaluating Driver's Driving Style,
Transactions on Transport Sciences, 7(1), 9–16
[2] J. C. Herrera, D. B. Work, R. Herring, X. J. Ban, Q.
Jacobson, and A. M. Bayen, “Evaluation of traffic data
obtained via GPS-enabled mobile phones: The mobile
century field experiment,”TransportationResearchPart
C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 568 – 583,
2010
[3] P. H¨andel, J. Ohlsson, M. Ohlsson, I. Skog, and E. Nygren,
“Smartphone-based measurement systems for road
vehicle traffic monitoring and usage-based insurance,”
Systems Journal, IEEE, vol. 8, pp. 1238–1248, Dec. 2014
[4] L. Vincent, “Taking online maps down to street level,”
Computer, vol. 40, pp. 118–120, Dec 2007.
[5] “Usage based insurance, Global study – Free abstract.”
2013 Edition, Oct 2013. Ptolemus Consulting Group.
[6] D. Work, O.-P. Tossavainen, Q. Jacobson, and A. Bayen,
“Lagrangian sensing: traffic estimation with mobile
devices,” in American Control Conference, 2009. ACC
’09., pp. 1536–1543, 2009.
[7] P. Mohan, V. N. Padmanabhan, and R. Ramjee, “Nericell:
rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using
mobile smartphones,” in Proceedings of the 6th ACM
conference on Embedded network sensor systems,
SenSys ’08, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 323–336, ACM,
2008.
[8] L. Vincent, “Taking online maps down to street level,”
Computer, vol. 40, pp. 118–120, Dec 2007.
[9] B. Hull, V. Bychkovsky, Y. Zhang, K. Chen, M.Goraczko,A.
Miu, E. Shih, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Madden, “Cartel: A

distributed mobile sensor computing system,” in
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on
Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys ’06,
(New York, NY, USA), pp. 125–138, ACM, 2006
[10] P. Händel, J. Ohlsson, M. Ohlsson, I. Skog, and E. Nygren,
“Smartphone-based measurement systems for road
vehicle traffic monitoring and usage-based insurance,”
Systems Journal, IEEE, vol. 8, pp. 1238–1248, Dec. 2014.
[11] P. Händel, I. Skog, J. Wahlström, F. Bonawiede, R.
Welch, J. Ohlsson, and M.Ohlsson,“Insurancetelematics:
Opportunities and challenges with the smartphone
solution,” Intelligent Transportation SystemsMagazine,
IEEE, vol. 6, pp. 57–70, winter 2014.
[12] Lin, C.E.; Shiao, Y.S.; Li, C.C.; Yang, S.H.; Lin, S.H.; Lin, C.Y.
Real-time remote onboard diagnostics using embedded
GPRS surveillance technology. IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech.
2007, 56, 1108–1118.
[13] Sa, J.S.; Chung, N.H.; Sunwokk, M.H. Experimental
analysis of driving patterns and fuel economy for
passenger cars in Seoul. Int. J. Automot.Technol. 2003,4,
101–108.
[14] Conci, N.; De Natalea, F.G.B.; Bustamante, J.; Zangherati,
S. A wireless multimedia framework for the
management of emergency situations in automotive
applications: The AIDER system. Signal Process. Image
Commun. 2005, 20, 907–926.
[15] Angkititrakul, P.; Petracca, M.; Sathyanarayana, A.;
Hansen, J.H.L. UTDrive: Driver behaviour and speech
interactive systems for in-vehicle environments. In
Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium,
Istanbul, Turkey, June 13–15, 2007.
[16] Edlin, A.S. Per-Mile Premiums for Auto Insurance.
Economics for an Imperfect World: Essays in Honor of
Joseph Stiglitz, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003.
Available online:
http://works.bepress.com/aaron_edlin/28/ (accessed
on 10 May 2010).
[17] Litman, T. Distance-Based Vehicle InsuranceFeasibility,
Benefits and Costs: Comprehensive Technical Report,
VTPI 2008. Available online:
www.vtpi.org/dbvi_com.pdf/(accessedon9May2010).
[18] Parry, I.W.H. Comparing alternative policies to reduce
traffic accidents. J. Urb. Econ. 2004, 54, 346–368.
[19] Greenberg, A. Designing pay-per-mile auto insurance
regulatory incentives. Transp. Res. D. 2009, 14, 437–
445.
BIOGRAPHIES
Mrs. J.C. Hadoltikar is Pursuing
Master o TechnologyinElectronics
and Communication from Dr.
Babasaheb Ambedkar
Technological University, Lonere
since 2017. She pursued Bachelor
of Engineering from University of
Aurangabad in 2008 and pursued
Diploma in Electronics and
Communication Engineering from
Govt. Residential Women’s
Polytechnic Latur in 2005. She is
working as a Lecturer since 2010
in Electronics Engineering
Department of P. L. Govt.
Polytechnic, Latur. Her area of
interest is Communication,
Microwave and RADAR
communication, Fiber optic
Communication She has 9 years of
teaching experience.
Prof. J. S. Hatte is working as an
assistant professor in the
Department of Electronics
engineering at M. S. Bidve
Engineering College Latur
(Maharashtra). Her area ofinterest
is Communication, Embedded
system, Network analysis and
synthesis, optical communication.
She has 18 years of teaching
experience.

IRJET- A Review Paper on Insurance Telematics for Vehicle Insurance

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (16)

Similar to IRJET- A Review Paper on Insurance Telematics for Vehicle Insurance

Similar to IRJET- A Review Paper on Insurance Telematics for Vehicle Insurance (20)

More from IRJET Journal

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET- A Review Paper on Insurance Telematics for Vehicle Insurance