Equal Rights Amendment Pros And Cons

Equal Rights Amendment Pros And Cons
The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) states "that the rights guaranteed by the Constitution apply equally to all persons regardless of their sex." The
ERA should not only protect rights of the opposite sex but also races, sexualitys and religious beliefs. The Equal Rights Amendment was first passed
by Congress in 1972 and sent to the states for ratification. Unfortunately, the ERA was only ratified by 35 states, needing three more for it to be
inserted into the constitution. If the ERA was changed to protect all peoples rights, not only the opposite sex, I believe over the required 38 states
would have agreed to ratify it. The Equal Rights Amendment's main focus previously was civil rights being denied based off of their sex. SInce the late
1900's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Equal Rights Amendment will advance the standing of the United States globally. It will reduce violence because people will learn to treat
everyone equally regardless of the persons sex, race, sexuality, or religious beliefs. Once passed and changed, the Equal Rights Amendment will
abolish all laws that enable discrimination. It will protect all people, especially minorities. There will be no uncertainty in a court proceeding on what
exactly is discriminatory or not. The ERA will clearly describe situations where discrimination is present. This reduces the controversy in the legal
system regarding discrimination. Since the United States Constitution does not assure us that our rights are protected and equal, the ERA will be a
positive addition to the constitution because it gives everyone comparable rights. The Equal Rights amendment should be altered because the
Constitution does not state much about protection of race and religion. Although the 13th Amendment does not allow slavery, it does not protect the
rights of races. The first amendment allows freedom of religion. This is the only amendment regarding religion in the Constitution. There is no
amendment protecting sexuality's of citizens. All of these issues should be added to and protected by the Equal Rights Amendment. As citizens our
freedom is very well limited. The ERA will grant us more equal
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

2nd Amendment Rights
"All men are created equal," a true statement or false hope? Liberty, Democracy, Rights, Equality, and Opportunity. are all outlined in the Declaration
of Independence as goals set for America. However, it is debated today if America has lived up to the Ideals. It is more evident that America has not
lived up to the Ideals expressed, especially those of Rights, Equality, and Opportunity. As the government increases gun control laws, Americans feel as
if their 2nd Amendment Right is being compromised. Some American citizens believe they are being denied things because they are considered
un–Equal. Lastly, gay couples believe they deserve the same opportunities given to straight couples. "We hold these truths to be self–evident, that all
men... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, in Colorado, a bakery refused to sell a gay couple a wedding cake. The gay couple, who felt discriminated against, also felt as if they
were not being given the same opportunities as a straight couple, who the bakery would have happily made a cake for. This also relates to placard
M, The Civil Rights Movement, because African Americans were being segregated from others. They felt as if they had no way of doing what they
wanted to do or say. Many other examples of include students trying to attend colleges. College can be expensive, so families and students must deal
with the hardships of trying to pay. It is believed that all schools should teach students, no matter if they can pay tuition or not. This relates to placard
L, The Fifties, because will the $100 billion saved by Americans, they were able to build new homes and upgrade schools. This allowed more
opportunities for students to become

Pros and Cons of the Equal Rights Amendment Essay
Pros and Cons of the Equal Rights Amendment
The Equal Rights Amendment began its earliest discussions in 1920. These discussions took place immediately after two–thirds of the states approved
women's suffrage. The nineteenth century was intertwined with several feminist movements such as abortion, temperance, birth control and equality.
Many lobbyists and political education groups formed in these times. One such organization is the Eagle Forum, who claims to lead the pro–family
movement. On the opposite side of the coin is The National Organization for Women, or NOW, which takes action to better the position of women in
society. Feminism is the most powerful force for change in our time. The Equal Rights Amendment has been a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Some supporters say that because women's salaries still lag behind men, we need an Equal Rights Amendment more than ever (Hennessey 3). The real
issue, claim some supporters, is the "right to bodily integrity, and without this basic right, women can have no true freedom" (NOW 2). Legal sex
discrimination is not a thing of the past, and the progress of the last forty years is not irreversible without the protection of an amendment (Francis
1).Feminist claim that "The ERA's most valuable effect would be the psychological victory it would provide women" (Steiner 35). Women are
underpaid in the workforce, required to pay higher insurance premiums and are half as likely as men to get pensions (NOW 4). Supporter of the Equal
Rights Amendment remind us of a traditional assumption, В‘Men hold rights and women must prove that they hold them" (Francis 2). Supporter claim
amazement that, "Even in the twenty first century, the United States Constitution does not explicitly guarantee that all the rights it protects are held
equally by all citizens" (Francis 4). Supporters of the Equal Rights Amendment believe that "unless we put into the Constitution the bedrock principle
that equality of rights cannot be denied or abridged on account of sex, the political and judicial victories women have achieved with their blood, sweat
and tears for the past two

The Equal Rights Amendment Proposition
The Equal Rights Amendment proposition to the United States Constitution was sent down to the state level in 1972, but was met by an organized
opposition of religious conservative women trying to save the country and the family home from the secularizing transition to modernity. The ERA
embodied all the fears of the conservative woman.
Since statehood there has been a strong cultural division based on gender in Oklahoma. A comprehensive Legislative Council study, in 1972 and
revised in 1976, covering gender – specific laws (Reese and Loughlin 221). A few of the findings in the study showed the divisions in genders by the
following: barred wives from voting and holding offices, limitations of workable hours for women, and other biased ordinances (Reese and Loughlin,
222). The Tulsa World editorial attacked the joint report published by the Oklahoma Human Rights Commission and the Governor's Advisory
Commission on the Status of Women; The report drew light to the under representation of the three minority groups, which are the following: women,
racial, and ethnic (Reese and Loughlin, 222). Support grew for the editorial stances that opposed the changing roles of women, but supported equal pay
(Reese and Loughlin, 222). The gender biased culture was reinforced by the biased regulations on women within Oklahoma throughout the 1970s
(Reese and Loughlin, 222).
Conservative values influenced the development of Oklahoma grew more support during the battle against the ERA in the

Fourth Amendment Rights
Upon doing a little research about dogs and how they are used within the law legally can be controversial, but dogs using their noses is actually a very
key tool. In the case 543 U.S. 405 (2005) ILLINOIS V. CABALLES No. 03–923. A routine traffic stop by a State Trooper , stopped Roy Caballes,
while this stop occurred the Trooper Daniel Gillette walked is narcotic dog around the respondents vehicle. The dog detected an odor of marijuana
which was located in the trunk and the respondent was arrested. Caballes's Fourth Amendment Rights were not violated, which most would
probably argue that State Trooper Gillette violated Caballes. In fact the Fourth Amendment allows a dog to "sniff" around the outside of a vehicle
without a warrant and considers this not invading any personal space or a citizens privacy. The only time this would be a violation would be if an
officer of the law held the stop longer than it needed to be, or stalled the stop improperly just to make an excuse for the dog to "sniff", for example in
the case of 575 (2015) RODRIGUEZ V. UNITED STATES No. 13
–9972. As far as the law enforcement or a law enforcement dog the use of a dog is
not considered a search even when in a airport for example sniffing luggage, bags, purses, briefcases, garbage(in a bag outside of a can ) example:
United States Supreme Court CALIFORNIA v. GREENWOOD, (1988) No. 86–684, envelopes, because what the dog is doing, is "alerting" that
something may be illegal... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Amendment. As for a person's home privacy is much more a right according to the Forth Amendment, in order for a police dog to "sniff" and search
your home a warrant needs to be in effect or probable cause is in order. This also applies to the outside of your home, an officer can not use a dog
on the outside of your home this is invading a persons private space. Although we do have to take notice an officer of the law can not search your
home even with a dog unless they obtain a

The Equal Right Amendments Of The Equal Rights Amendment
The Equal Right Amendment The Equal rights Amendment was proposed to set equality for every citizen no matter the sex. The amendment has three
sections. The first one states "equality of rights under the law should not be denied by the U.S on the account of one's sex." Section two says that
"congress has the power to enforce this law." Last but not least, section three says the amendment will take effect two years after ratification. The ERA
is a proposed amendment made to guarantee equal rights to all U.S. citizens no matter the sex. In 1872 when the issue was introduced to congress it
was quickly sent out to the states to get the opinion of the amendment. Many states ratified the amendment shortly after it was sent out. The United...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Paul dedicated her life to equal rights for all women. She has impacted many people in this world from the struggles and hardships she went through to
try to make things right for women. Paul was a very intelligent women, she graduated at the top of her class. Congress gave the amendment seven years
for ratification when it was submitted in 1972. Many states ratified the amendment quickly, other states refused the ratification. A big debate in the time
of the amendment ratification was that women were just different then men. Women would never hold the same powers and fulfill the same things as
men. Women began to form many organizations to support the amendment. Women tried everything in their power to get the law passed. The
constitution's 14th amendment is to protect the right of all citizens, but that does not guarantee the discrimination of the sex. The equal rights
movement would make a better standard for deciding on cases of sex discrimination. The 14th amendment does not protect anyone from sex
discrimination. The ERA would provide legal defense to women's rights. This amendment would help all humanity, not just women. Still today, sex
discrimination is still an ongoing event. We still need the passing of the ERA. Although, since then women's rights have improved. Women are still not
equal to men. If it came down to it men would still be chosen over a women. We, as women should still fight for the ratification of the Equal

Pros And Cons Of The Equal Rights Amendment
Should women be treated equal to any other person under the law? Should the United States of America abolish all legal differences of men and
women? This is a very controversial topic and the discussion of this goes all the way back to the early feminist movement of the ninteenhundreds.
Equality for women could be accomplished if the equal rights amendment is ratified by the states. The Equal Rights Amendment states, "Equality of
rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." The campaign to pass the ERA has long
been a war of feminist versus feminist. One faction focused on the similarities of the sexes and women's humanity to demand equality and the other
feminists focused ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Representative Bella Abzug of New York and feminists Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, it won the requisite two
–thirds vote from the U.S. House of
Representatives in October 1971. In March 1972, it was approved by the U.S. Senate and sent to the state.
Once it was sent to the states for ratification in March 1972 it had seven years to become ratified by three–fourths of the states. By 1973 the ERA had
become ratified by 30 of the required 38 states. The ERA only was ratified in five more states before the 1979 deadline was reached, then Congress
extended the deadline to 1982. The supporters organized boycotts and demonstrations in numerous states that hadn't ratified the amendment yet in
hopes of gaining support. However, after the extension of the deadline, some of the states, due to growing opposition, wished to rescind their
ratification of the amendment and no more ratified it. Despite public opinion polls showed the majority in favor of the ERA, the amendment fell short
of being ratified by three states.
Society of the past was a major opponent of the Equal Rights Amendment. They believed men were better than the women and therefore could work
better while women were more suited to work inside the home. The culture of domesticity often referred to as the Cult of Domesticity was the
prevailing ideals throughout most of the 19th century that held by society about upper and middle class women. As pointed out by John Green in his
video "Women in the 19th

The First Amendment Rights
Our world is changing and so are our rights. The First Amendment, freedom of speech, is taking the world by storm. Whether it be at sporting events or
on college campuses, our First Amendment rights must be upheld. College is meant to provide each student with knowledge; ensuring they experience
viewpoints from thousands of people, and taking away our First Amendment rights is taking away our opportunity to learn and further our education.
2017 isn't the first time the First Amendment has been brought up for debate on college campuses. Kent State is one of the most violent and
unconstitutional violations of First Amendment rights on a college campus. The spirited young adults protesting the war at Kent State were not
rebelling, they were only sharing the knowledge they valued deeply. "Students were killed and nine injured when members of the Ohio National Guard
opened fire during a demonstration protesting the Vietnam War." (Rosenberg). The students protesting the Vietnam war were giving others the
opportunity to see something from a different perspective; this is the goal for liberal education. These student's ideas were suppressed and limited
because they were not popular ideas. The goal of getting a higher education is to expand your thoughts and experience different beliefs. Not only were
lives taken this day, but opportunities to learn and change the world. The Kent State students were only trying to help others understand their antiwar
convictions. Taking away these

Equal Rights Amendment Analysis
The Equal Rights Amendment, or ERA for short, was an amendment that was in place from 1923 to 2014. This amendment gave equal rights and
protection to women. This amendment would help end discrimination based on the gender of a person. In 1923, it was first introduced to Congress.
Prior to this, women had already been given the right to vote. However, there was still discrimination toward women, limiting their opportunities to
be accepted into a good job. Most of these jobs were only open to men, as stated by the text "Still a Tough Road" The text states "Many jobs,
particularly in management and other positions of power, were only open to men". This piece of evidence shows that only men were given the jobs
that got paid more money and were usually jobs that you had power in. Men believed that women had no competence in order to take on these jobs,
and therefore, not giving them the opportunity to be employed for the job seemed to be the only solution. Many people have different views on the
ERA. Some people support the amendment, saying that... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many people thought that this was a good thing, saying that this would give equality to all women. However, some disagreed, saying that this would
change the way of life and how everything is done. If the ERA has been ratified, many views and opinions would be changed about women, and they
would be able to have more jobs than men and get more money in order to support their children. The Pew Study would not have been the same either.
It would have been the opposite of what they said about men working more than women. Women would have more jobs because of their intellect, and
they have more degrees than men. Therefore, the Equal Rights Amendment was brought up because of women complaining about their rights and
opportunities, and people have different views on this topic, that is still being debated on

Equal Rights Amendment Failure
The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was defeated because of its popularity throughout its ratification and women opposing the Amendment itself. The
ERA was an Amendment introduced to the United States that gave equal rights to every gender. This meant that there would be no differences
between a male and a female in terms of divorce, work, etc. This Amendment was seen as the only way to eliminate gender discrimination. In 1923 the
idea was first brought to Congress by a group called the National Women's Party. However, amending the Constitution is a very difficult process. First,
Congress present the Amendment and get a majority vote of two–thirds from the House and the Senate. After the Amendment is passed by Congress
then it must be ratified by three–fourths of the states. Even though Congress passed the ERA and the future seemed bright. The states did not ratify the
Amendment. Therefore, the Amendment died off by 1982. The ERA failed for multiple reasons however one of the main reasons that it failed was due
to its popularity in every population. According to Document A, Thomas J. Reese felt that is was very hard to get a majority of a population's votes
and pass an Amendment. He believed that the tactics present were enough to destroy the ERA. This is because the tactics prevented the movement
from getting the support it needed to become ratified. What is ironic is that the tactics of the pro–ERA groups that basically hurt themselves. Their
protests included bra burning,

The Equal Rights Amendment Essay
The Equal Rights Amendment Essay
What could be more important than the equality of rights for all American citizens? Women have tried without success for 80 years to be acknowledged
as equals in our Constitution through an Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). Currently there is nothing in the United States Constitution that guarantees a
woman the same rights as a man. The only equality women have with men is the right to vote. In order to protect women's rights on the same level as
men, I am in favor of an Equal Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution today.
There have been many determined women and organizations such as the NASWA and the NWP that have fought long and hard to gain the right to
vote. Although it's been a long battle to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Equal Rights Amendment was reintroduced in Congress in July of 1982 and has been before every session of Congress since then, and there still
has not been a majority ratification to add this Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
After more than 200 years of living under the United States Constitution and despite all of the progress women have made, they still to this day
continue to suffer discrimination in employment, insurance, health care, education, the criminal justice system, social security and pensions, and just
about any other area you can name.
Current laws to prevent sex discrimination just aren't enough. The federal laws and regulations contain many loopholes and they are inconsistently
interpreted, or even ignored. Women who seek enforcement of these laws must not only convince the courts that discrimination has occurred, but that it
even matters. An Equal Rights Amendment would not only guarantee equality, it would take the burden off women fighting discrimination and hold
those who discriminate accountable.
Another area where the current laws are inadequate deals with employment and salaries for women. Women are underpaid and undervalued in the
workforce. In 2008, women were paid a median weekly salary of $654, where men were earning $825 weekly for doing the same job. (1) Jobs
traditionally held by women remain at the lower end of the pay scale, while traditional men's jobs, even those having similar

Women 's Equal Rights Amendment
Campaigning for the Equal Rights Amendment in the early twentieth century, women found it particularly difficult to have their efforts opposed by
other women. One of the hovering questions that went along with the proposal of the amendment was whether those supporting equality for women,
advocating the equality of opportunity, would also support the enablement of women to be freely different from men without consequence. There were
passionate feelings on both sides of the arguments and this debate brought into focus many questions about equality. Despite the magnificent
accomplishments of all the movements and efforts of women, complete gender equality had yet to be achieved.
The Equal Rights Amendment had been a major cause controversy after its initial proposal in the early nineteenth century. Feminists of that time found
it especially painful when some of their fellow women opposed the amendment. The conflict focused on whether the proposal would completely fulfill
the needs of women, give them more opportunities, and allow women to flourish not just in the workplace but also in all aspects of society. Despite a
heavy opposition by both women and men, the National Women's Party introduced the amendment to the Constitution in 1923. The main intentions of
this movement included a resolution to the paradox of an oppressed minority. The amendment was not created to change the public's values but to
modify its behavior, much like the Fourteenth Amendment. Its purpose was to

Equal Rights Amendment Summary
Xiaomeng, I really enjoyed reading your post and completely agree with your point of view on the matter of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA).
The 1920's opened the door to the idea of the ERA and individuals such as Alice Paul and the National Women's Party paved the way to secure
constitutional rights for women. The members of the Women's Party focused their time and energy on the ERA to help in guaranteeing women
constitutional protection from discrimination. Paul spent all her life advocating for these rights and well as other issues affecting women during the
20s. Paul considered herself a conservative but her vision for women had always gone beyond her own conservatism. Shortly before her death, she
was quoted as saying, "I think if

The Bill Of Rights : The Amendment Rights
In 1791, the Bill of Rights was created to specify the individual rights of every human being. Madison James is the creator of the 10 Amendments, he
believed it was necessary to create the document to further explain what the Constitution will provide for each person. The Bill of Rights gives every
citizen the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, as well as the freedom of the press, and lastly the due process rights. This document was
formed when the Constitution in 1789 was drafted. Federalist viewed the Bill of Rights as an unnecessary document that the Anti–federalist wanted in
order to feel safe in knowing what the Constitution was really about and what was entitled to them. The 9th Amendment assures you cannot be denied
certain rights, even if you 're not told your rights you still have them. The 9th amendment stated the following, " the enumeration in the Constitution of
certain rights, shall not be constructed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." This amendment grants you the rights that were not
specified in the first 8 Amendments. For example, you have the right to have an abortion and you won 't get in trouble because it 's not illegal. This
amendment was created to limit the power of the government over every individual. This is important for everyone so they aren 't taken advantage. In
1965, "Griswold v. Connecticut," a supreme court case about the use of birth control. Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut, was given

The Equal Rights Amendment : The Consequences Of The Equal...
Ellen DeGeneres states, "I'm not an activist; I don't look for controversy. I'm not a political person, but I'm a person with compassion. I care
passionately about equal rights. I care about human rights. I care about animal rights."("Ellen DeGeneres Quotes."). Ellen is a popular television host
that isn't afraid to express her opinion to the public. She knows that people do not need to have a high education in equality to understand the every
person deserves to be seen and treated equally. People can still take a stand and make a difference simply by supporting a cause. Imagine being
discriminated against for something one cannot control, such as their sex. Many people had faced this, until someone decided to take charge. The Equal
rights Amendment was supposed to protect oneself from this type of discrimination. A lot has had to happen just to get this amendment up and running
to be introduced. The equal rights Amendment has a long history and can be linked to many famous writings, which makes it easily relatable to almost
everyone. The Equal Rights Amendment was formed to combat legal sex discrimination. The act seeks to end discrimination between women and men
in terms of property, divorce, and employment rates along with many other matters. Many supporters of the ERA marched, rallied, and committed acts
of civil disobedience just to show awareness, but little did many know they were part taking in a historical continuum in the fight for equality (Francis,
Roberta W.).

Equal Rights Amendment
The Equal Rights Amendment, which was introduced in 1923, was a movement for women's rights that ultimately lasted until 1982. The Equal Rights
Amendment is discussed in our textbook, America, A Concise Theory, on page 898. This particular site was chosen because it comes directly from the
website dedicated to the history of the Equal Rights Amendment. The amount of informative content and photos was also a factor in choosing this
website. Although there were several interesting facts in the articles, three stuck out to me the most. The first interesting piece of information was the
amount of effort it took to allowing equal voting rights. In 1848, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and another woman, Lucretia Motts, gathered over 300
people for a two day meeting to bring attention to the lack of equality. After several resolutions were passed fairly easily, equality in voting still
proved to be a problem. Twenty four years later in 1972, Susan B. Anthony was arrested, convicted and fined for trying to cast a ballot in the election.
Stanton, Motts and Anthony all pioneered the way for women to work towards equality in voting, but all died before they ever had a chance to cast
their own votes. The second interesting fact of the articles was how the 19th Amendment passed. At the start of the 20th century, the 19th Amendment,
which is women's rights to vote, seemed to be making major progress. More than half of the required states ratified the amendment within the first year,

Equal Rights Amendment 1920
Recollection of popular memory, the decade that followed soon after World War I was referred to as the Jazz Age or the Roaring Twenties (Foner
769). With its flappers; which were young, sexually liberated women (Foner 760–770), speakeasies (nightclubs known for selling liquor in violation of
Prohibition), and a rising stock market that was stimulated by easy credit and a get–rich–quick outlook, it was a time of revolt against many of the
ethical rules handed–down from the nineteenth century (Foner 770). In addition to this, similar to that of the labor movement, feminists were fighting
to adapt to the new political situation. The 1920 suffrage achievement eradicated the bond of unity between numerous activists, each "struggling for her
own ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
No longer an element in any ties to a program of broad social reform, sexual freedom now was defined as individual rebellion (Foner 777). Equally
important, with bobbed hair, short skirts, public drinking and smoking, and unapologetic birth control methods, the singe, young "flapper" embodied
the change in standards of sexual behavior, at least in the case of large cities (Foner 777). She visited dance halls and music clubs where white
people engaged in "wild" dances like the Charleston which had been popular early on in black communities. She also frequented sexually charged
Hollywood films that featured stars like Clara Bow, the provocative "It' Girl," and Rudolph Valentino, the original on
–screen "Latin Lover." (Foner
777). Furthermore, what was once scandalous a generation earlier had become a device to market goods from automobiles to cigarettes (Foner 778).
Finally, having found a husband, women were expected to look for freedom within the confinements of their own home, finding "liberation," according
to the advertisements, in the used of new labor–saving appliances (Fonner 778). Many professional opportunities for women continued to be limited
due to the assumptions about what jobs were suitable for females. The "new professional woman" was clear and widely publicized image. However, the
reality was that most women who were married did not

Equal Rights Amendment Research Paper
BACKGROUND INFO ABOUT WHAT THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT IS:
In recent discussions of equal rights, a controversial issue is whether it means the equal treatment between women or men or equity. On one hand,
according to the Equal Rights Amendment article found in Issues by John R, Vile most Equal Rights Amendments also known as ERA propose three
parts to it. Section one which states "equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the US or any state on account of sex".
Section two which instructs "gives congress enforcement power and finally section three which calls for a transitional period of two years after its
ratification.
EQUAL TREATMENT:
On the other hand, the only thing that the amendment calls for is no discrimination ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, there are approximately 2.1 million Americans held in prisons and local jails (infographic). According to Darryl Paulson a professor of
government states that "3.9 million Americans (1 in 50) can't vote". At least 13 states ban ex–felons from voting. States have such long processes for
prisoners to obtain their right to vote again. For example, in Florida, according to Darryl, felons must wait seven years after serving their sentences
before seeking restoration of their voting rights. It currently takes nine more years to complete the review afterwards. People such as Congressmen
Thomas Feeney of Florida say that "choosing lawmakers is a privilege, one that society has a right to bestow selectively". However, Studies have
shown that felons who earn the right to vote are far less likely to return to prison. If people want equal rights, why can't prisoners have them

Gender Equality : The Ratification Of The Equal Rights...
In the year of 1923, the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) became a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would ensure gender
equality for both men and women that was drafted by Alice Paul who was a suffragist. But sadly, the required two–thirds majority in both the House
and Senate opposed the Equal Rights Amendment. In March 1972, the Equal Rights Amendment passed both houses of Congress and was sent to the
states for ratification. In 1982, the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment was passed and unfortunately the ratification goal was
short of three states so the Equal Rights Amendment expired and still to this day, we don't have an Equal Rights Amendment that will enshrinegender
equality once and for all. Women in the United States have passed through great milestones like in the year of 1920 when the 19th Amendment in the
Constitution gave the women the right to vote, the Equal Pay Act that was passed in 1964 which ensured that women get paid the same amount as
men for the same type of work, gender discrimination laws towards women in the workforce became enacted in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the
support of women running for public office by the help of Friedan who was a huge part of the National Women's Political Caucus in the year of 1966.
So if the women gained so much of these type of freedoms through these great milestones, then why do we still not have an Equal Rights Amendment to
this present day? This question remains

The History Of The Equal Rights Amendment
The history of the Equal Rights Amendment can be closely related to women's rights advocacy, that started toward the very beginning of the history of
the United States dating back to the days of Abigail Adams. The United States constitution had been first interpreted as rights granted to certain white
males, leaving other majority groups suppressed and working for equal rights.
In 1923, the Equal Rights Amendment was introduced to congress. Since then, the amendment was introduced to every session of congress until it
passed and reworded in 1972. The proposed 27th Amendment now reads: Section I. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by
the United States by any state on account of sex. Section II. The Congress shall

Alice Paul Reintroduces The Equal Rights Amendment
After the Women's Suffrage Movement, Alice Paul introduces the Equal Rights Amendment in 1923 to Congress, but is pushed aside as it was not
seen as great importance at the time, hence why it was not urgent for it to be reviewed and passed for an awaited ratification. A new movement rolls in
to improve the conditions women faced in the late 1900s, also known as the second–wave feminist movement. Martha Griffiths, a woman who served
on the House Committee on Ways and Means, reintroduces the Equal Rights Amendment, after revising it, in the 92nd Congress. The amendment was
given seven years to be ratified by thirty eight states and unfortunately, only twenty two had ratified it in their states, resulting in the amendment not
being passed. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
n the years to follow, after women are granted the right to vote, Congress and Alice Paul introduce the amendment. As stated previously, it has been
ignored for decades, until Griffiths created a joint resolution and reintroduces the improved amendment. During the time in which the ERA had not
been brought up by the congress, the National Women's Organization, otherwise known as NOW, had been advocating for it, being created in
1967 and lead by Paul. NOW repeatedly asks and protests for the amendment to be passed so it could be ratified by the states. Even after the ERA
is passed, NOW does not stop in spreading the word about the amendment, not now, not ever (now.org). Betty Friedan's book, titled The Feminine
Mystique had waken up the many minds of those who felt like they were missing something from their lives; women who were not content with their
lives in which they only served their family and were only looked down upon (Friedan 1963). Moreover, this unexplained misery the women in the
1900s felt, all had one thing in common, they were all housewives. Similarly, in The Americans textbook (2006), it is shown that a significant portion
of the women in college share the same idea, in the end. In an interview with women from Stanford University, it is shown that, "Of graduates in 1965,
70 percent planned not to work at all when their children were of preschool

The 1st Amendment : The Rights Of The First Amendment
In the United States Constitution, the First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances" (Gold). Historically, as demonstrated in cases such as Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the U.S. Supreme
Court, as well as the government in general, has well–upheld this amendment, but starting sometime in the second half of the 20th century, they are
slowly embracing it less and less, as demonstrated in cases such as Texas v. Johnson. The recent hostility towards the First Amendment demonstrates
that its rights... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The ruling of Tinker. V. Des Moines is a good example of how well the Supreme Court used to highly value First Amendment rights. In the early
Supreme Court case, which happened in the 1960s, seven out of nine justices, the vast majority of the Supreme Court (Gold), voted in the students'
favor. This fits in with other early Supreme Court rulings, such as the 1940 court ruling in Thornhill v. Alabama where they stated that First
Amendment rights applied to picketers as long as they did not cause property destruction or harm others (Gold), or the ruling in West Virginia v.
Barnette later in the 1940s in which the court stated that "students also had a right to express themselves symbolically" (Gold). Early U.S. Supreme
Court opinions supported Americans' right to symbolic speech as long as it did not cause a "clear and present danger" to others (Gold), and the fact that
the aforementioned early rulings were in favor of this right supports this. How often the Supreme Court voted in favor of the First Amendment in the
era Tinker v. Des Moines took place shows that they used to highly value First Amendment rights. In addition to demonstrating that the Supreme Court
used to be highly in favor of the First Amendment, Tinker v. Des Moines demonstrates that the First Amendment does not harm anyone. According to
the Supreme Court, there was "no evidence whatever of petitioners' interference, actual or nascent, with the schools' work or of collision with the rights
of other

The Amendment Of The Bill Of Rights
An important provision of the Bill of Rights is the protection of freedom to publish, as provided by the First Amendment. This protection applies to
all kinds of publications, even those that print unpopular opinions. In most censorship cases, every attempt is made to suppress the written word
after publication, not before. Minnesota passed a law in 1925 that sought to prevent newspapers, magazines, and other publications from printing
obscene, malicious, scandalous and defamatory material. This law was called the Minnesota Gag Law . This law allowed private citizens and/or
public prosecutors to request a court injunction to shut down any publication that was known as a public nuisance. Publishers of newspapers had to
show that they had good motives for anything they were going to print before they printed it. Jay M. Near owned a newspaper called The Saturday
Press which was located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He sought to report on corruption in city politics. The articles he published stated that
Minneapolis was being controlled by a Jewish gangster. Near frequently criticized officials and accused them of being dishonest. He argued that
Jews were ruling the city and that the governor was incompetent. He also alleged that the chief of police was taking bribes. Near was arrested. Based
on the Minnesota law, Near was stopped from publishing his newspaper in 1925 . The county attorney sued Near on behalf of the state of Minnesota.
According to Cornell University Law

Ratification Of The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)
The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)
"I never doubted that equal rights was the right direction.... to me there is nothing complicated about ordinary equality" (Alice Paul). Alice Paul, a very
prominent figure in our history, was the one who said this quote. Born on January 11, 1885, she was part of many political achievements towards
equality, but one of the most long lasting things she did was write the Equal Rights Amendment, also known as ERA. The Equal Rights Amendment
was proposed in 1923 and the amendment still has been brought up in every congressional meeting to be discussed. The ERA was finally passed by
congress in 1972 and was sent to be ratified by the states. Here we are 45 years later and the ERA still has not yet been ratified. If ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Most other countries already have some kind of legal document that in some way states that men and women should have equal rights. If we want
to improve our ranking among these countries, then passing the ERA is a big step in that direction. The divide is clear to see in some of the other
countries that were not able to get as close as we have to having equal rights. In the countries that do have equal rights for men and women, such as
Iceland, we are just catching up. This amendment is needed to ensure that our country doesn't slip to the ways of some other countries such as
Pakistan. In Pakistan only 25% of women are in the workforce while 86% of men are, not only are there less women in the workforce, but they also
earn less since the male to female income ratio is 18%. That means that for every dollar a man makes a woman would only make 18 cents. The United
States only has a income ratio of 80%, but there should not be a gap at all (Hess, 2014). The work is equal but women's pay is less than men's.
According to the World Economic Forum as of 2016 the United States was 45th in the Global Gender Gap Index. If we were to ratify the ERA then
we could easily improve our ranking. Improving our rank is only one of the many benefits that we would receive if we were to finally ratify the

Bill Of Rights Amendment Analysis
The Constitution establishes the basic rights of all Americans, provides directions on how the government should function and the basics of law and
order. Additionally, the Bill of Rights protects the liberties of individuals. When injustices occur, laws are wrongly enforced, or individual rights are
violated, it is the obligation of citizens to take a stand against these transgressions. Civil disobedience and peaceful resistance to these infractions are a
forceful means to cause change and have a positive impact on a free society.
Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to injustice everywhere." These words remind us to take a stand when we witness
violations of the Constitution. He recommended that we collect facts ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Not only was the lengthy military action very unpopular, the young men being drafted were not of age to vote. They were conscripted and sent to war
without having any say in the matter. As a sign of protest, many burned their draft cards, sought exclusion through disabilities, or filed as conscientious
objectors. Thousands of young men escaped the draft by fleeing to Canada unable to return to the United States. The anti–war protests and high number
of resistors to the draft resulted in too high a number of people to punish or send to prison. As a result, President Carter later granted general amnesty to
those who had fled to other countries and allowed them to return to the United States. An additional positive outcome of the continued efforts was the
lowering of the voting age from twenty–one to eighteen.
Overall, civil disobedience is a concentrated effort to affect change in society. It is enormously important when others infringe upon thehuman rights of
the individual guaranteed by the Constitution. Without the possibility to freely speak and express our discontent with unjust and unfair treatment, we
would be subject to the ideals of government officials with no check on their power. The opportunity for the populous to openly disagree positively
impacts a free

Animal Rights Amendment
There should not be an amendment to the constitution granting animals rights. The reason I feel there should not be any amendment is because they
provide us with food, give us resources that we use daily and we also get long lasting clothes from using their fur or flesh. But I do believe there should
be laws on how to properly kill animals we consume or use for their fur, flesh or meat.
According to the article A Change of Heart about Animals says "What these researchers are finding is that many of our fellow creatures are more
like us then what we had ever imagined. They feel pain, suffer and experience stress,affection, excitement and even love..." But if the amendment
were to be passed how would we be allowed to hunt and kill to get meat. Animals such as pigs, cows, deer, and chickens provide us with meat to
feed our families and consume. We would not be able to continue doing this because in a lot of places they believe and feel this is cruel. How would
we be able to survive without being able to consume meat? Not everyone in the world is a fan of having to becoming vegetarians and have to cut meat
out ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They should not be abused or treated in a cruel way before being killed. Being killed in cruel ways now that I am against. They should have laws and
procedures on how to do it right and not put the animals through so much pain and suffering. It should be as fast as possible so the animal being
sacrificed for us does not feel as much pain. Animals feel everything we do!! Animals feel love, happiness, sadness and everything we do for example
in the article A Change of Heart about Animals explains about Koko "Equally impressive is Koko, the 300–pound Gorilla Foundation in Northern
California, who was taught sign language and has mastered more than 1,000 signs and understand several thousands English words.On a human IQ
tests,she scores between 70 and

Essay On Equal Rights Amendment
The Equal Rights Amendment was passed by the both house of congress in 1972, then it was sent to all fifty states legislatures for Ratification. Only
35 out of 38 states ratified the bill. The reason behind this amendment was that many felt that women weren't protected by the 14th amendment, since it
was written for males. Equality is equal right among people and it fairness for all, something that was already said in the constitution as part of the 14th
amendment. So the reopening isn't necessary. The content might be directed towards males but things have changed and women too are protected.
Also, because anytime males are drafted into the army the females will also be drafted. It, also didn't work out even with what they went though, which
was protest, marches, rally, etc. this are some reason why the ERA shouldn't be open again.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Which it clearly does state that "Granted Citizenship to ALL persons born or naturalized in the U.S." Also, now a days things have change over
time and people have think differently about womens working and they get to veto. This is just some evidence based that women's are protected and
have equal right, which the 14th amendment states. The second reason, it shouldn't reopen is because, on the LATimes it states that if males are
drafted into the army and also the females will be drafted as well as the males. If that happens it would be a waist of time because equality is given
on the 14th amendment, which if women began to get drafted it would work against us. Also if this movement reopens, men and women will have to
fight in wars therefore, children with parents won't have either parents to watch over them and will be left alone. So if the amendment gets open this
will cause problem and destroy

Equal Rights Amendment Argument
The Boundless Push for the Equal Rights Amendment
The progress that lead to the ratification process of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), in 1972, began over a century earlier. The advocates for
women's rights began their efforts in 1848 at the first Women's Rights Convention in Seneca Falls, New York , where a meeting of 300 men and
women was held which called for justice for women in a society that limited their privileges. By 1900, women had gained the right to keep their
earnings and own property. By 1920, they had gained the right to vote. By 1963, women were paid equally to men for completing the same work. In
1964, the Civil Rights Amendment was passed and outlawed discrimination based on gender, religion, and race. In 1972, Title IX... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The Equal Rights Amendment stated, "Equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."
Schlafly, and her Stop ERA movement, were strongly opposed to this societal change. In Schlafly's speech, What's Wrong with 'Equal Rights' for
Women?, in 1972, she vocalized that, "Of all the classes of people who ever lived, the American woman is the most privileged. We have the most rights
and rewards, and the fewest duties. Our unique status is the result of a fortunate combination of circumstances." The anti–equal rights group believed
that the ERA would lead women away from the support of their husbands, overturn privacy rights, send women into combat, uphold abortion rights and
same–sex marriages, and ultimately leave women with less rights than before. Phyllis Schlafly and Stop ERA supporters believed that the ERA was
morally impractical because it would eliminate the traditional role of a female in society. Despite Schlafly's speeches, feminists and pro–ERA
supporters continued to push for equal rights and finally, on March 22, 1972, the Equal Rights Amendment passed the U.S. Senate and then the House
of Representatives and continued to the states in order to be ratified. In order for the ERA to be added to the Constitution, it needed approval from
thirty–eight of the fifty states within the span of seven–years. After the seven years, only thirty–five states had approved the amendment, falling three
states short of ratification. This lack in support was influenced by Schlafly's anti abortion and gay rights opinions after delegates and female protesters
began to support taxpayer funding of abortions and a new gay rights agenda. People who supported equality of

The Failed Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment in...
The ERA was introduced in every Congress since 1923, and yet it still failed to gain ratification. The ERA was the Equal Rights Amendment,
which means that equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. I believe
it was never passed because of many reasons. One reason was because some ERA supports got offended by other supports who were very
obnoxious, which was a backlash on feminist tactics. (Doc. E & F) Another is that men and women might switch places, and it would be a threat to
traditional roles.(Doc. J &M) My last reason for why the ERA was defeated is because since men and women would have equal rights, the women
could also be drafted and serve the country.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
E) Another group of supporters in 1982 put their hands in a triangle shape (which is the symbol for the ERA), chained their selves to each other and
kneeled on the ground in front of a public entrance. (Doc. F) This was so extreme that many people cropped the photo because of the men laughing in
the background, meaning they didn't take this seriously at all. This could have been a possibility of the ERA was defeated because some conservative
women got offended as well as other ERA supporters that didn't feel the need to participate in some of these unbearable tactics. They might have gone
to the other side, the anti–ERA, not wanting to be thought as a member of these obnoxious supporters.
Men back then thought they needed to be working, and when they came home a nice meal should be already prepared and waiting for them. They
thought if the ERA was passed, that the men and women would switch roles having the men spend more time in the kitchen and with the children. In
1974, a man had his photo taken who had plenty of signs on him saying things like "No meals prepared", "Child Abandonment", and "Sour Wife?"
(Doc. M) A consensus of men voted against the ERA thinking that they might become the wife and the wife become the husband. This could be a
possibility of why the ERA wasn't passed because almost all of men voted against the ERA, hoping that this would keep them from doing a few of
their wives' jobs and continue being the leader of the house.
My last reason is

The Amendment And The Rights Amendment
Possibly the most conversational amendment to every make it's way through the Senate and the House was the Equal Rights Amendment in 1972. The
Equal Rights Amendment was, "introduced through the twenties, thirties, forties, fifties, and sixties without success" (Schneir, 369). Various
organizations such as the National Woman's Party (those who proposed it),National Organization for Women, the Women's Department of the United
Auto Workers, and many other feminists worked most if not all of their lives to pass this specific amendment. In the early 1970's, the House approved
the amendment by a large ratio of 354 to 23. Additionally, in 1972, the Senate also passed the amendment by another shocking ratio of 84 to 8.
Unfortunately, the amendment did not pass by its deadline of June 30th, 1982 by only thirty–five states approving it for ratification by at least
thirty–eight states (Schneir, 370). There were various reasons why the amendment did not pass, and Miriam Schneir discussed several of these in the
section Equal Rights Amendment in the book Feminism in Our Time. Though the Equal Rights Amendment had various dedicated supporters working
to pass it, it also had several Anti–Equal Rights Amendment working to make sure it DID NOT pass. One key figure in this Anti–Equal Rights
Amendment was Phyllis Schlafly. Schlafly argued that the passing of the Equal Rights Amendment would cause there to be a boom in the creation of
unisex bathrooms. She argued that bathrooms

Women's Rights : Alice Paul And The Equal Rights Amendment
Throughout history, women have not been treated the same as men. This was not only limited to gender roles without in the home, they did not have
the same rights in society as their male counterparts. In the 1900s, women and men fought to guarantee equal rights for both genders by adding an
amendment to the U.S constitution. This process would prevent discrimination against both men and women, and would give women certain rights for
the first time in American history. There were several people who played important roles in the passing of theEqual Rights Amendment (ERA), but
Alice Paul had the most influential impact. Paul and the ERA are lesser known products of the Civil Rights Movement, but without their contributions,
women today would not be treated the same as men. For these important people and many more is way women have the right to vote and the same
rights as men.
Alice Paul, and many other brave women, suffered through not having equal rights and eventually became fed up with being treated as lesser
humans. This push for equal rights began in Seneca Falls, NY in 1923. The amendment was written to guarantee equal rights to women and men, and
was presented to Congress for approval. In 1972 congress approved the equal rights of men and women sending the text to states for approval. In
1983 the ratification expired and only 35 states had voted for all women and men having equal rights. The Era fell of 38 states for the requirement of
the amendments to be added

The Civil Rights Movement And The Equal Rights Amendment
During the 20th century, male and females were not being treated equally a lot of women started getting mad because they weren't getting jobs or the
right to vote as men, so it led to the Civil Rights Movement, the Equal Rights Amendment was involved, because women weren't treated equally or
given the same rights as males. The Civil RIghts Movement was when there was a lot of racism and black and white people weren't given the same
rights, it was unfair to the black because they couldn't do so many things like vote and also there was sex discrimination. In 1923, Alice Paul, leader
and founder of the National Woman's Party, considered that ERA should be the next step in the 19th Amendment in granting equal justice under the
law to both sexes, male and female, in the U.S. Alice Paul said " We women of America tell you that America is not a democracy. Twenty million
women are denied the right to vote." A text from the amendment said "Equal of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by theUnited States
or by any state on account of sex." The Equal Rights Amendment was created to give equal rights to both female and male because they weren't getting
treated equally. Women didn't have the same rights as males, one of them was voting and during that time it was a really big problem in the U.S. Also,
because there was so much sex discrimination like females weren't getting the respect they should and they would treat them so bad, because women
couldn't vote, own

The Timeline Of The Equal Rights Amendment
In 1921, women were granted suffrage, but suffragists were still hungry for more. Knowing that the right to vote would not eliminate sex
discrimination in America, Alice Paul wrote the Equal Rights Amendment to step closer to equality. After half a century of struggle, women in
America are still fighting for rights that men were given to when they were born. Even though women are just as intelligent, capable and hardworking
as men, if not more, they are not considered an equal under the U.S. Constitution. Can you believe that today, in the 21st century, we still degrade
women and treat them as inferiors to men? Can you believe that just because you are a woman, you are less than equal to the male population? Look
around you, all those boys and girls are not equal to each other under our "just" country's laws. As it is long overdue, the Equal Rights Amendment
should be ratified because there is no other amendment that talks about sex discrimination, it would eliminate any inequality in regards to sex, and it
would make the judicial stance on sex discrimination cases much clearer.
Timeline of ERA
The Equal Rights Amendment is a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that declares the "Equality of rights under the law shall not be
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." To propose an amendment, в…” of both the Houses need to vote. To ratify an
amendment, Вѕ of state legislatures need to agree. In 1972, Congress passed the ERA and approved it for

Rights Of The First Amendment
Rights of the First Amendment
Countless Americans today don't appreciate our nations bill of rights that our founding fathers included into our nation's constitution protects our own
rights. Of all the 10 amendments in the bill of rights the 1st amendment protects our personal rights the most. The first amendment established the right
for all Americans to have the freedom of religion, speech, and the press. This amendment essentially forbids the government from restricting an citizen
from its own free exercise of religion, impeding one's right of freedom of speech, and to restrict the freedoms of the press. In this essay I will talk about
why this amendment is so important to American citizens rights.
The first amendment is important in many

The Bill Of Rights : The Amendment Rights
1 . Introduction In 1791, the Bill of Rights was created to specify the individual rights of every human being. Madison James is the creator of the 10
Amendments, he believed it was necessary to create the document to further explain what the Constitution will provide for each person. The Bill of
Rights gives every citizen the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, as well as the freedom of the press, and lastly the due process rights.
This document was formed when the Constitution in 1789 was drafted. Federalist viewed the Bill of Rights as an unnecessary document that the
Anti–federalist wanted in order to feel safe in knowing what the Constitution was really about and what was entitled to them. The 9th Amendment
assures you cannot be denied certain rights, even if you 're not told your rights you still have them. The 9th amendment stated the following, " the
enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be constructed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." This amendment grants
you the rights that were not specified in the first 8 Amendments. For example, you have the right to have an abortion and you won 't get in trouble
because it 's not illegal. This amendment was created to limit the power of the government over every individual. This is important for everyone so
they aren 't taken advantage. In 1965, "Griswold v. Connecticut," a supreme court case about the use of birth control. Planned Parenthood League of

Essay On The Equal Rights Amendment
Alice Paul and Crystal Eastman wrote the Equal Rights Amendment. The ERA is an amendment to the United States Constitution created to guarantee
equal rights amongst all citizens disregarding the sex. It specifically states "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the
United States or by any state on account of sex". The ERAs purpose was to end the legal distinctions between men and women in terms of divorce,
property, employment, and other matters. In 1923, the amendment was introduced for the first time in Congress by the National Women's Party and
since then has brought up many conversations about men and women's equality.
During the process of trying to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment there were certain people who were huge supporters of the amendment and others
who were eager to prevent it from happening. During the 1970's and 1980's, there were many different feminist groups in New Orleans, such as the
National Organization for Womenor NOW, the Independent Women's Organization or IWO, and the Women's Liberation Coalition or WLC. NOW
and IWO were categorized to be more of the liberal groups, whereas the WLC was the more radical collective group. In 1966, feminist Betty Friedan
co–founded NOW. This organization was an aspire for women, to bring them "into the mainstream of American society now [in] fully equal partnership
with men." Friedan was also homophobic. She referred to lesbians as the "lavender menace", and warned NOW chapters not

Equal Rights Amendment Pros And Cons
The influential Phyllis Schlafly used her platform against the Equal Rights Amendment to emphasize that the possibility of having equal rights between
men and women would be "destructive and antifamily". Schlafly found the amendment to be disturbing when the ERA gained a strong support system
for its adoption; nevertheless, she started the STOP ERA movement in order to stress the importance of having a traditional family in America. The
primary purpose of the amendment was to prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender in the United States (S&L 103). The support of this amendment
was because women felt that they were being institutionally discriminated by the patriarchal dominance. The idea that women who were wives and
mothers had to be supported by their husbands and work exclusively in their home was played out. Many women wanted to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In Schlafly's interview with Washington Star, she stated that the ERA would take away our laws that are entitled to reflect the natural differences and
the role assigned by God (S&L 105). These "laws" that she is referring to is the sanctity of the husband supporting his wife and family, praising God,
and husbands paying alimony to wives. If the ERA was passed, the woman would have to support the family and pay for the same things men would
pay, which should not happen; it is deemed unconstitutional and disorderly in terms of tradition and the country's original conservative principles that
the man is the provider. It would also challenge the Christian heritage if Americans themselves are losing their faith in God. Christianity is not
prohibited in many public places, but it would be against the First Amendment to pass a law that could potentially prohibit the exercise of the Christian
faith in households and in America, which would be

Pupil Rights Amendment
In our new world of technology, substance abuse, mental health, and sexual practices are being discussed in the news, television, radio, social media
and even in school. Parents cannot control what their children are learning outside their home as well as what is being taught in school. Hence, the law
provides the rights of parents and student that governs sensitive topics that are being conducted in school. The "Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment
(PPRA) (20 U>S>C $ 1232h; 34 CFR Part 98) was enacted in 1978, and applies to student surveys, instructional materials or evaluations funded by the
federal government that deal with highly sensitive issues." Under the (PPRA), "Parents have the right of written consent... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
They are giving their trust to all the teachers and faculties with the hopes and beliefs that these individuals will help in the upbringing of their children.
Hence, the parent's rights and trusts have been put in questioned and violated once again in some school districts in the U.S. For instance, there was
another incident happened at Memorial Middle School (MMS) in Fitchburg, MA. that students were required to complete the Youth Risk Behavior
Survey (YRBS) which asks explicit questions about sexual practices, substance abuse, and mental health without their parents' knowledge. As
mentioned in this article, the U.S Supreme Court has ruled that, "the child is not the mere creature of the state and that the right of parents to make
decisions concerning the care, custody and control of their children are a fundamental liberty interest protected by the U.S Constitution." This incident
that was happened in Memorial Middle School (MMS), Fitchburg MA. was conducted against the Supreme Court as well as the Protection of Pupils
Right Amendment law. Generally, those parents who send their children to school believed that school teaches many things as well

Equal Rights Amendment Pros And Cons

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Ioulia King

More from Ioulia King (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Equal Rights Amendment Pros And Cons